INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IMPACT ON CHINA AND GOOGLE DUE TO GOOGLE’S EXIT- BASED ON GOVERNANCE, POWER STRUCTURE AND GLOBAL ECONOMY BY - DR.S.UMA MAHESWARI

Authors: DR.S.UMA MAHESWARI

Registration ID: 108648 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8648

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: s.umamaheswari.advocate@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-45684552/IMPACT ON CHINA AND GOOGLE DUE TO GOOGLE’S EXIT-

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND SEPARATION OF POWERS BY - SAKSHI SHARMA & YATI YADAV

Authors: SAKSHI SHARMA & YATI YADAV

Registration ID: 108646 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8646 & IJLRA8647

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: yatu.yadav77@gmail.com & sakshisharma11112001@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-61842754/COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND SEPARATIO

A CRITICAL NOTE ON CONCEPT OF TIME LIMIT ON RESERVATION POLICIES BY - RISHABH GUPTA

Authors: RISHABH GUPTA

Registration ID: 108645 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8645

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: rishabhguptadnlu@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-49588273/A CRITICAL NOTE ON CONCEPT OF TIME LIMIT ON RESERV

EVERY CHILD IS DIFFERENT – AN EXAMINATION OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND THE LAW IN INDIA (POCSO) BY - YATI YADAV

Authors: YATI YADAV

Registration ID: 108644 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8644

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: yatu.yadav77@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-15196157/EVERY CHILD IS DIFFERENT – AN EXAMINATION OF CHI

BENJAMIN CARDOZO’S PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE ON JUDICIAL REFORMS AND CASE PENDENCY IN INDIA. BY: VISHWAS VINOD AWARI

Authors: VISHWAS VINOD AWARI

Registration ID: 108643 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8643

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vishwasawari@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-59147767/BENJAMIN CARDOZO’S PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE ON JUDI

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTS AND SUSTAINABILITY BY - N NITHYA SHREE

Authors: N NITHYA SHREE

Registration ID: 108642 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8642

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: nithyashree1315@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-13855582/ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTS AND SUSTAINABILITY

THE ROLE OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION IN ENSURING SOCIAL JUSTICE: THE CASE OF RESERVATION POLICY BY - PRIYANSHU KUMAR

Authors: PRIYANSHU KUMAR

Registration ID: 108641 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8641

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: Kumarpriyanshu68906@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-18116195/THE ROLE OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION IN ENSURING SO

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN: AN EVOLVING RIGHT BY - DR. TANVEER KAUR

Authors: DR. TANVEER KAUR

Registration ID: 108640 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8640

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: tanveersethi31@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-13576445/THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN: AN EVOLVING RIGHT

NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LABYRINTH: INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS’ LIABILITY ON COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASES BY - SRI PRAGNYA A, OISHANI DEB & ARYAN ROY

Authors: SRI PRAGNYA A, OISHANI DEB & ARYAN ROY

Registration ID: 108635 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8637, IJLRA8638 & IJLRA8639

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: pragnyaaisola1423@gmail.com, oishanideb@gmail.com & aryan.roy1330@gmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-97713883/NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LABYRINTH: INTERNET SERVICE P

MAPPING LAND ACQUISITION JURISPRUDENCE OF INDIA AND THE JUDICIAL INTERVENTIONS RELATING TO IT BY: MR. PRANAV SRI KRISHNA B & MR. MAHALINGAM V

Authors: MR. PRANAV SRI KRISHNA B & MR. MAHALINGAM V

Registration ID: 108635 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8635 & IJLRA8636

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: pranavsrikrishna@gmail.com & mahalinv@srmist.edu.in

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-96671486/MAPPING LAND ACQUISITION JURISPRUDENCE OF INDIA AN

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[2] Randall L.Schweller ,”Bandwagoning for profit :Bringing the Revisionist State Back In “,International security 19(1) (Summer 1994):72-107.

[3] Lanteigne, M. (2010). Chinese Foreign Policy-Introduction (2010 ed.). New York: Routledge.p-10

[4] ((eds)) D.Putnam, H. K. (1993). Double -Edged Diplomacy:International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University Of California

[5] A.Cossa, R. ((Summer/Fall1999)US-Japan-China Relations :Can Three -Part Harmony be Sustained? (Vol. 6(2)). The Brown Journal of International affairs.

[6] (2007). Document of the 17th Congress of the Communist Party of China. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.

^{^[1]}The author is a graduate LL.M, B.A.LL.B(Hons.) graduate,from National Law University Jabalpur and practicing advocate at Hon’ble High court of Madhya Pradesh.

^{^[2]}[Reservation of seats and special representation to cease after a certain period]. —Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, the provisions of this Constitution relating to—(a) the reservation of seats for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the House of the People and in the Legislative Assemblies of the States; and(b) the representation of the Anglo-Indian community in the House of the People and in the Legislative Assemblies of the States by nomination, shall cease to have effect on the expiration of a period of definite number of years.

^{^[3]} Ashok kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008) 6 SCC 1.

^{^[4]} Anirudh Pratap, Reservation: Policy, practice and its Impact on Society, Vol.1, 2016

^{^[9]} Indra Sawhney v. Union of India 1992 SCC (L&S) Supp.1. P.286 (para 564)

^{^[15]} S. Ranganathan, Constitution of India- Five Decades, Bharat Law House, 1999 at p.312.

^{^[16]} K.C. Vasanth Kumar v. State of Karnataka AIR 1985 S.C. 1495 at p.1499.

^{^[18]} M. R. Balaji and Others vs State of Mysore 1962 SCR Supl. (1) 439

^{^[19]} T. Devadasan v. The Union of India and another 1964 SCR (4) 680

^{^[23]} M. Nagaraj v. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 212.

^{^[26]} No. 36012/2/96-Estt. (Res.), Government of India, Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training)

^{^[27]} Indra Sawhney v. Union of India 1992 SCC (L&S) Supp.1 at p.70

^{^[28]} Constituent Assembly of India Debates (Proceedings) - VOLUME IX Thursday, 25^th August, 1949

^{^[29]} The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, Article 14 of Indian Constitution.

^{^[32]} Indira Hirway Rethinking Reservations and Development’ The Hindu, 31.8.2015, p.10

^{^[34]} Ashok kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008) 6 SCC 1 at p.684 (para 558).

[1] LLM Student – Manav Rachna University, Faridabad

[2] The Children’s Assessment Center, “Child Sexual Abuse Facts & Resources”, fact no. 2, https://cachouston.org/prevention/child-sexual-abuse-facts/

[3] United Nations, “Convention on the Rights of the Child” https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

[4] The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012

[5] National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India Year Wise 2022, volume 1, no. 317, https://ncrb.gov.in/crime-in-india-year-wise.html?year=2022&keyword=

[6] Setting Up POCSO Fast Track Courts Will Be Futile Unless More Judges Are Appointed: Justice BV Nagarathna” Published by: Deepankar Malviya, published on: 11 Dec 2022, last accessed 17 Jun 2024. https://www-livelaw-in

[7] Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana (01.07.2013 - SC) : MANU/SC/0626/2013

[8] Nipun Saxena and Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. (11.12.2018 - SC) : MANU/SC/1459/2018

[9] Attorney General for India and Ors. vs. Satish and Ors. (18.11.2021 - SC) : MANU/SC/1086/

[1] National Judicial Data Grid. (2021), Summary Report of India (NJDG, 2021) https://njdg.ecourts.gov.in/njdgnew/index.php accessed 15 October 2024.

[2] Benjamin N Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press 1921).

[4] National Judicial Data Grid. (2021). Summary Report of India (n 1).

[6] Law Commission of India. (2014). Report No. 245: Arrears and Backlog: Creating Additional (wo)manpower (Law Com No. 245, 2014).

[7] Benjamin N Cardozo, The Growth of the Law (Yale University Press 1924).

[8] Richard A Posner, Cardozo: A Study in Reputaion (University of Chicago Press 1990).

[9] Hussain and Anr vs. Union of India, (2017) 5 SCC 702

[10] Swapnil Tripathi vs. Supreme Court of India, (2018) 10 SCC 639.

^{^[1]} Mathilde Hautereau-Boutonnet, The Effectiveness of Environmental Law Through Contracts, in The Effectiveness of Environmental Law 67 (Sandrine Maljean-Dubois ed., Intersentia 2017), https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780687384.005.

^{^[2]} International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), A Framework for Assessing and Improving Law for Sustainability (2022), https://iucn.org/resources/publication/framework-assessing-and-improving-law-sustainability.

^{^[3]} International Institute for Sustainable Development, Contracts for Sustainable Infrastructure: Ensuring the Economic, Social, and Environmental Co-Benefits of Infrastructure Investment Projects, Dec. 1, 2017, at 5-14.

^{^[5]} National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management, Spice (Mar. 2003), https://www.manage.gov.in/pgdmabm/spice/March2k3.pdf.

^{^[6]} Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Public Private Partnerships for Affordable Housing in India (2023), https://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/PPP%20Models%20for%20Affordable%20Housing.pdf.

^{^[7]} Shailesh, How We Failed to Implement Environmental Laws in India, Green Clean Guide (2017), http://greencleanguide.com/how-we-failed-to-implement-environmental-laws-in-india/.

^{^[11]} ITC, Sustainability as a Driving Force for ITC, ITC Portal (2024), https://www.itcportal.com/sustainability/index.aspx.

[1] Indra Sawhney Etc. Etc vs Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc AIR1993SC477

[2] Bakshi, P.M. (2018). The Constitution of India. Universal Law Publishing

[3] Sukhadeo Thorat, Social Justice and reservation in India, in Social Exclusion and Justice in India 125, 134-38 (C. K. Chandramohan ed., 2018).

[4] V.N. Shukla, The Constitution of India (M.P. Singh ed., 13th ed. 2017)

[5] Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992 1992 AIR SCW 3682

[7] Justice and constitution in India by Sukhadeo Thorat – Offer an in-depth analysis of social justice and affirma ve ac on in India.

[8] The Constitution of India by P.M. Bakshi – Provides detailed explanations of constitutional amendments and landmark judgments on reservation on policies

[9] Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (2020). Annual Report. Government of India.

[1] Bennett, C. J., &Raab, C. D. (2017). The governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective. Ashgate Publishing.

[2] European Commission. (2018). Data protection and privacy in the EU: Your rights.

[4] Cohen, J. E. (2019). What privacy is for. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1904-1936.

[5] Margarit, A. (2018). The right to be forgotten: An analysis of its legal and practical implications. European Journal of Law and Technology, 9(1), 1-24.

[6] Kuczynski, J. (2020). Censorship vs. privacy: The dilemma of the right to be forgotten. Digital Privacy Journal, 5(1), 45-67.

[7] Purtova, N. (2018). The right to be forgotten: A European perspective. In The Oxford handbook of data protection law (pp. 345-367). Oxford University Press.

[8] Bennett, C. J. (1992). Regulating privacy: Data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. Cornell University Press.

[9] European Commission. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation.

[10] Bennett, C. J. (2017). The right to be forgotten: A comparative perspective. In Privacy and data protection in the age of big data (pp. 45-62). Palgrave Macmillan.

[11] California Legislative Information. (2018). California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

[12]Regan, P. M. (2017). Privacy, technology, and the right to be forgotten. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(1), 123-150.

[13] González Fuster, G., et al. (2020). The right to be forgotten in the European Union: The current status and future perspectives. Journal of Law and Cyber Warfare, 9(1), 45-68.

[14] Kawashima, K. (2021). Data privacy in Japan: Recent developments and future directions. Privacy Law & Business International Report, (164), 10-12.

[15]Bygrave, L. A. (2018). Data protection law: Approaching its rationale, logic and limits. Kluwer Law International.

[16] UK Government. (2021). Data protection and privacy after Brexit.

[17] Writ Petition (Civil) No 494 of 2012; (2017) 10 SCC 1; AIR 2017 SC 4161

[20] Sullivan, M. (2017). Public interest and the right to be forgotten: Balancing privacy and freedom of expression. Media Law Review, 25(2), 45-65.

[21] Binns, R. (2018). Data privacy and the right to be forgotten: The social media challenge. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(6), 1247-1260.

[22] Morrison, D. (2016). The challenges of implementing the right to be forgotten: A search engine perspective. Internet Policy Review, 5(2), 1-18.

[23] Jung, J., &Ahn, J. (2020). The right to be forgotten on social media: A case study of user privacy and content removal. Journal of Information Policy, 10, 80-99.

[24] Shadbolt, N., et al. (2016). Big data and privacy: The challenge of the right to be forgotten. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 723-730.

[25] González Fuster, G., et al. (2017). The emergence of privacy in social media: A study of Facebook and Twitter users. In Privacy and identity management (pp. 123-140). Springer.

[26] De Hert, P., &Papakonstantinou, V. (2016). The right to be forgotten: A comparative study of the legal frameworks in the EU and the US. In Data protection and privacy: The age of the GDPR (pp. 3-24). Hart Publishing.

[27] Google LLC v. NT1 & NT2. (2018). High Court of Justice.

[28] Wright, D. (2019). The right to be forgotten: Balancing privacy and public interest in the UK. European Data Protection Law Review, 5(1), 17-29.

[29] González, M. C. (2020). Privacy in Brazil: The impact of data protection laws on freedom of expression. Journal of Comparative Law, 15(2), 123-145.

[30] Margarit, A. (2018). The right to be forgotten: An analysis of its legal and practical implications. European Journal of Law and Technology, 9(1), 1-24.

[31] Pfitzmann, A., & Hansen, M. (2010). Anonymity, unlinkability, undetectability, and unobservability: A consolidated proposal for terminology. In Privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 1-19). Springer.

[32] Sweeney, L. (2019). Privacy, technology, and the global right to be forgotten: Challenges and opportunities. Internet Policy Review, 8(2), 1-19.

[33] Rosen, J. (2012). The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Review, 64(1), 88-137.

[34] Culnan, M. J., &Bies, R. J. (2003). Managing privacy: The challenge of information technology. California Management Review, 45(3), 24-46.

[1] Students of BA LLB (Intellectual Property Hons.), KIIT School of Law, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha

[2] Viswanath, A. (2020, March 3). Intermediary liability for intellectual property infringement.Tradeamrk- India. https://www.mondaq.com/india/trademark/899230/intermediary-liablity-for-intellectual-property-infringement

[3] Alex Comninos, ‘The liability of internet intermediaries in Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa and Uganda: An uncertain terrain’ (2012) at p6

[5] 2017 Report of the UNSR on Freedom of Expression at para 50

[6] Dalvi, M. (2019, July 26). Intermediary liability and copyright. Copyright - India. https://www.mondaq.com/india/copyright/829986/intermediary-liability-and-copyright

[7] Viswanath, A. (2020, March 3). Intermediary liability for intellectual property infringement. Trademark - India. https://www.mondaq.com/india/trademark/899230/intermediary-liability-for-intellectual-property-infringement

[11] Litman, J. (2020). "The Impact of Cyberspace on Intellectual Property Law: A Comprehensive Analysis." Journal of Copyright Law, 24(3), 15-30.

[12] Boyle, J. (2022). "Copyright Protection in the Digital Age: Challenges and Opportunities." International Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26(1), 45-62.

[13] Gibson, L. (2021). "The Transient Nature of Digital Content: Challenges and Legal Considerations." Journal of Digital Law, 18(2), 78-93

[14] Hugenholtz, P. (2021). "Jurisdictional Complexities in Enforcing Copyright Laws in Cyberspace." International Journal of Cyber Law, 15(4), 102-115.

[15] Bently, T. (2017). "Digital Reproduction Challenges in Copyright Enforcement." Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 30(2), 35-48.

[16] Samuelson, P. (2018). "Global Accessibility and Copyright Enforcement: Bridging Jurisdictional Gaps." Copyright Law Review, 12(4), 55-68.

[17] Litman, J. (2019). "Ephemeral Nature of Digital Content: Tracking and Monitoring Challenges." International Journal of Copyright Law, 23(2), 20-35.

[18] Hugenholtz, P. (2020). "Agile Enforcement Mechanisms for Digital Content Protection." Journal of Digital Rights Management, 15(2), 78-93.

[19] Boyle, J. (2021). "Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): Legal Framework for Addressing Copyright Infringement." Journal of Cyber Law, 17(1), 45-62.

[20] Samuelson, P. (2019). "AI and Copyright Enforcement: Enhancing Detection and Mitigation." Journal of Digital Law, 18(1), 102-115.

[21] Bently, T. (2018). "Technological Protection Measures (TPMs): Balancing Copyright Protection and User Rights." Journal of Digital Rights Protection, 10(1), 35-48.

[22] Litman, J. (2019). "Fair Use and Fair Dealing: Flexibility in Copyright Law." Journal of Copyright Law, 23(3), 55-68.

[23] Samuelson, P. (2018). "Global Accessibility and Copyright Enforcement: Bridging Jurisdictional Gaps." Copyright Law Review, 12(4), 55-68.

[24] Boyle, J. (2021). "Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): Legal Framework for Addressing Copyright Infringement." Journal of Cyber Law, 17(1), 45-62.

[25] Litman, J. (2019). "Ephemeral Nature of Digital Content: Tracking and Monitoring Challenges." International Journal of Copyright Law, 23(2), 20-35.

[26] Hugenholtz, P. (2020). "Agile Enforcement Mechanisms for Digital Content Protection." Journal of Digital Rights Management, 15(2), 78-93

[27] Boyle, J. (2022). "Evolving DRM Strategies: Enhancing Digital Content Protection." Journal of Digital Rights Management, 20(1), 78-93.

[28] Samuelson, P. (2018). "Global Accessibility and Copyright Enforcement: Bridging Jurisdictional Gaps." Copyright Law Review, 12(4), 55-68.

[30] Duggal P, Unsured liability of ISPs under the proposed amended IT Bill 99, http:/cyberlaws.net/cyberindia/ liablity htm (15 May 2007).

[32] MySpace Inc. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd (2017) 236 DLT 478 (50, 51, 53–63, 67, 68, 77).

[33] Joshi, Divij. 2018. “Indian Intermediary Liability Regime: Compliance with the Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability.” Centre for Internet and Society. https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/files/indian-intermediary-liability-regime.

[34] Padmanabhan, Ananth. 2014. “Can Judges Order ISPs to Block Websites for Copyright Infringement.” Centre for Internet and Society. https://cis-india.org/a2k/blogs/john-doe-orders-isp-blocking-websites-copyright-1.

[37] Schuerman E, Internet Service Providers and copyright liability-don’t touch! . . .or at least not too much: Costar v Loopnet, 373 F 3D 544 (4th CIR 2004), Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 30 (2006) 573.

[38] Barger Jt B W, Costar v Loopnet: Protection of the Internet at the expense of copyright protection?, http://jip kentlaw.edw/ art/volume206/6%20Chi-Kent%620J%20Intell%20Prop% 201.doc. Mukherjee S, Liability

[39] Wei W, The liability of Intemet Service Providers for copyright infringement and defamation actions in the United Kingdom and China: A comparative study, European Intellectual Property Review, 28 (10) (2006)

[40] Feist Publications Inc v Rural Tel Serv Co, 499 US 340, 361 (1991). Barger Jt B W, Costar v Loopnet: Protection of the Internet at the expense of copyright protection?, hittp://jip Jeentlaw.edu/art/volume%206/6%20Chi- Kent%20J%20Intell%20Prop%201.doc.

[41] Costar v Loopnet, 373 F 3D 544 (4th CIR 2004).

[42] 17 USC Section 512(K)(1)(A). http:/www4.law.cornell.edw/ uscode/htmliuscodel7/usc_sec_17_00000512----000-html.

[43] 17 USC Section 512(k)(1)(B). http:/www4.law.comell.edw/ uscode/htmliuscodel7/usc_sec_17_00000512----000-html.

[44] Joseph B G & Wasylik D P, Copyright issues on the Internet and the DMCA, Practicing Law Institute-Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series, 2003, 451.

[45] Section 512(d) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

[46] CDA Section 230, Immunity covers state intellectual property-related, tight of publicity claims, http://brownraysman.typepad.conv'technology_law_update/2 007/04/cda_section_230.html#more

b Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under The Law Inc v Craigslist Inc, Case No. 06 C 0657 (N D IIL, 14 November ~ 2006) in Online Defamation/Libel/ Communications Decency Act-Intemet library of law and court decisions, http:/wwiw.internetlibrary.comy/topics/ online_defamation.cfn

[48] Playboy Enterprises Inc v Frena, 839 F Supp 1552 (MD Fla 1993).

[49] Religious Technology Center v Netcom, 907 F Supp 1361 (N D Cal 1995), http:/www.tomwbell.com/NetLaw/Ch07/ Religious-C.html (17 May 2007).

[50] Mukherjee S, Liability of Intemet Service Providers for copyright infringement on the Internet: US vis-vis Indian position, http://www.legalservicesindia.comvarticles/ isp_in_us.htm

[53] 17 USC § 512(1)(1)(B). http://wwwi.law.comell.edwuscode/ html/uscode] 7/use_sec_17_00000512--000-html (27 August 2007). Mercurio B, Internet Service Provider Liability for copyright infringements of subscribers: A comparison of the American and Australian efforts to combat the uncertainty, http://www.murdoch.edu.awelaw/ issues/vond/mercuriods. html (9 May 2007). Francisco Castro, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Provisions on circumventing protection systems and limiting liability of service providers, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 3 (2004) 3.

[54] 17 USC § 512(g). http://www4.law.cornell edw/uscode/html/ uscodel7/use_sec_17_00000512--000-html

^{^[1]} Y.P. Bhagat, Kumar Keshav & Ranjeeta Singh, Commentary on The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Vinod Publications (P.) Ltd. 2022).

^{^[2]} Henry Maine, Ancient Law (J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., London, introduced by Prof. J.H. Morgan), available at http://www.loyalbooks.com/download/text/Ancient-Law-by-Sir-Henry-Sumner-Maine.txt.

^{^[4]} Tharanath & Vinaya V.S., Land Ownership and Land Acquisition Regime in India, 11 Int'l J. Humanities & Soc. Sci. Invention 101 (2022), available at https://doi.org/10.35629/7722-1112101107.

^{^[6]} Dr. Md. Hamid Husain & Firoj High Sarwar, A Comparative Study of Zamindari, Raiyatwari and Mahalwari Land Revenue Settlements: The Colonial Mechanisms of Surplus Extraction in 19th Century British India, 2 IOSR J. Humanities & Soc. Sci. (2012).

^{^[7]} Simran Arora, Land Acquisition in India, SSRN (Jan. 27, 2017), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906856.

^{^[8]} Janhavi S S, An Overview of Land Acquisition Act and Human Rights Issues, 2 Int'l J. Humanities & Soc. Sci. Invention (Sept. 2013).

^{^[10]} P.K. Sarkar, Law Of Acquisition Of Land In India 1 (Eastern Law House 3d Ed. 2012).

^{^[11]} I.C. Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab 1967 AIR 1643

^{^[12]} Sankari Prasad Vs. Union of India 1951 AIR 458

^{^[13]} Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar Vs. State of Gujarat AIR 1995 SUPREME COURT 142

^{^[14]} Hari Krishna Mandir Trust vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3969

^{^[15]} Chanchal Kumbhkar, Land Acquisition in India: A Critical Study Concerning Legal Rights, Academike, available at https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/land-acquisition-in-india-a-critical-study-concerning-legal-rights/.

^{^[16]} Keshavananda Bharati vs. Union of India AIR 1973 SUPREME COURT 1461

^{^[17]} Miverva Mills Vs. Union of India 1980 AIR 1789

^{^[18]} Nakshatra Gujrati, Land Acquisition Act: History & The Need to Strike Down Right to Property, Manupatra Articles (Sept. 20, 2022), available at https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Land-Acquisition-Act-History-The-Need-to-Strike-Down-Right-to-Property.

^{^[19]} Prof. Kahkashan Y. Danyal, Land Acquisition in India - Past and Present, 2016 Jamia L.J., available at Manupatra Articles.

^{^[20]} Property Owners Association Vs. State of Maharashtra 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 855

^{^[21]} State of Karnataka Vs Shri Ranganatha Reddy 1978 AIR 215

^{^[22]} Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Co. vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. 1983 AIR 239

^{^[23]} Mafatal Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India AIRONLINE 1996 SC 1268

IMPACT ON CHINA AND GOOGLE DUE TO GOOGLE’S EXIT- BASED ON GOVERNANCE, POWER STRUCTURE AND GLOBAL ECONOMY BY - DR.S.UMA MAHESWARI

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND SEPARATION OF POWERS BY - SAKSHI SHARMA & YATI YADAV

A CRITICAL NOTE ON CONCEPT OF TIME LIMIT ON RESERVATION POLICIES BY - RISHABH GUPTA

EVERY CHILD IS DIFFERENT – AN EXAMINATION OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND THE LAW IN INDIA (POCSO) BY - YATI YADAV

BENJAMIN CARDOZO’S PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE ON JUDICIAL REFORMS AND CASE PENDENCY IN INDIA. BY: VISHWAS VINOD AWARI

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTS AND SUSTAINABILITY BY - N NITHYA SHREE

THE ROLE OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION IN ENSURING SOCIAL JUSTICE: THE CASE OF RESERVATION POLICY BY - PRIYANSHU KUMAR

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN: AN EVOLVING RIGHT BY - DR. TANVEER KAUR

NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LABYRINTH: INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS’ LIABILITY ON COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASES BY - SRI PRAGNYA A, OISHANI DEB & ARYAN ROY

MAPPING LAND ACQUISITION JURISPRUDENCE OF INDIA AND THE JUDICIAL INTERVENTIONS RELATING TO IT BY: MR. PRANAV SRI KRISHNA B & MR. MAHALINGAM V

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation