INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN: AN EVOLVING RIGHT BY - DR. TANVEER KAUR

Authors: DR. TANVEER KAUR

Registration ID: 108640 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8640

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: tanveersethi31@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-13576445/THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN: AN EVOLVING RIGHT

NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LABYRINTH: INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS’ LIABILITY ON COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASES BY - SRI PRAGNYA A, OISHANI DEB & ARYAN ROY

Authors: SRI PRAGNYA A, OISHANI DEB & ARYAN ROY

Registration ID: 108635 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8637, IJLRA8638 & IJLRA8639

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: pragnyaaisola1423@gmail.com, oishanideb@gmail.com & aryan.roy1330@gmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-97713883/NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LABYRINTH: INTERNET SERVICE P

MAPPING LAND ACQUISITION JURISPRUDENCE OF INDIA AND THE JUDICIAL INTERVENTIONS RELATING TO IT BY: MR. PRANAV SRI KRISHNA B & MR. MAHALINGAM V

Authors: MR. PRANAV SRI KRISHNA B & MR. MAHALINGAM V

Registration ID: 108635 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8635 & IJLRA8636

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: pranavsrikrishna@gmail.com & mahalinv@srmist.edu.in

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-96671486/MAPPING LAND ACQUISITION JURISPRUDENCE OF INDIA AN

GENDER NEUTRAL RAPE LAWS IN INDIA: A STEP TOWARDS EGALITARIANISM BY - VINAYAN SINGH

Authors: VINAYAN SINGH

Registration ID: 108634 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8634

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: singhvinayan54@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-55716854/GENDER NEUTRAL RAPE LAWS IN INDIA: A STEP TOWARDS

FINAL THOUGHTS BY - ADV. AJAY SINGH RATHORE

Authors: ADV. AJAY SINGH RATHORE

Registration ID: 108633 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8633

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: ad.ajaysinghrathore777@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-48642971/FINAL THOUGHTS

A STUDY ON MODERN CHALLENGES ON TRADITIONAL CONCEPT OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP BY - MANISHA G. & R. PREETHI

Authors: MANISHA G. & R. PREETHI

Registration ID: 108631 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8631 & IJLRA8632

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: manishaadvocate610@gmail.com & preethilaw48@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-79677837/A STUDY ON MODERN CHALLENGES ON TRADITIONAL CONCEP

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF INTERSECTION OF TAXATION LAWS AND FIN-TECH STARTUPS IN INDIA BY: KASHISH KHANNA

Authors: KASHISH KHANNA

Registration ID: 108630 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8630

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: kashishkhanna4442@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-33189938/LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ASSES

E-BANKING FRAUDS: UNVEILING THE THREAT OF INSIDER RISKS BY - KRISHANGEE BHATTACHARYYA

Authors: KRISHANGEE BHATTACHARYYA

Registration ID: 108629 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8629

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: krishangeebhatta@gmail.com

Page No : 41 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-99875317/E-BANKING FRAUDS: UNVEILING THE THREAT OF INSIDER

PLEA BARGAINING: A TOOL TO NEGOTIATE JUSTICE AND AID THE OVERBURDENED COURTS. BY - RUUHANI THUKRAL

Authors: RUUHANI THUKRAL

Registration ID: 108628 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8628

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: ruuhithukral8899@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-33137976/PLEA BARGAINING: A TOOL TO NEGOTIATE JUSTICE AND A

DISCONNECT TO RECONNECT: INDIA’S QUEST FOR BETTER TELECOM LAWS BY - BANSHIKA GUPTA & PRIYANSHI CHAKRABORTY

Authors: BANSHIKA GUPTA & PRIYANSHI CHAKRABORTY

Registration ID: 108626 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8626 & IJLRA8627

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: arushi.r209@gmail.com & arushi.r209@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-72134447/DISCONNECT TO RECONNECT: INDIA’S QUEST FOR BETTE

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1] Bennett, C. J., &Raab, C. D. (2017). The governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective. Ashgate Publishing.

[2] European Commission. (2018). Data protection and privacy in the EU: Your rights.

[4] Cohen, J. E. (2019). What privacy is for. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1904-1936.

[5] Margarit, A. (2018). The right to be forgotten: An analysis of its legal and practical implications. European Journal of Law and Technology, 9(1), 1-24.

[6] Kuczynski, J. (2020). Censorship vs. privacy: The dilemma of the right to be forgotten. Digital Privacy Journal, 5(1), 45-67.

[7] Purtova, N. (2018). The right to be forgotten: A European perspective. In The Oxford handbook of data protection law (pp. 345-367). Oxford University Press.

[8] Bennett, C. J. (1992). Regulating privacy: Data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. Cornell University Press.

[9] European Commission. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation.

[10] Bennett, C. J. (2017). The right to be forgotten: A comparative perspective. In Privacy and data protection in the age of big data (pp. 45-62). Palgrave Macmillan.

[11] California Legislative Information. (2018). California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

[12]Regan, P. M. (2017). Privacy, technology, and the right to be forgotten. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(1), 123-150.

[13] González Fuster, G., et al. (2020). The right to be forgotten in the European Union: The current status and future perspectives. Journal of Law and Cyber Warfare, 9(1), 45-68.

[14] Kawashima, K. (2021). Data privacy in Japan: Recent developments and future directions. Privacy Law & Business International Report, (164), 10-12.

[15]Bygrave, L. A. (2018). Data protection law: Approaching its rationale, logic and limits. Kluwer Law International.

[16] UK Government. (2021). Data protection and privacy after Brexit.

[17] Writ Petition (Civil) No 494 of 2012; (2017) 10 SCC 1; AIR 2017 SC 4161

[20] Sullivan, M. (2017). Public interest and the right to be forgotten: Balancing privacy and freedom of expression. Media Law Review, 25(2), 45-65.

[21] Binns, R. (2018). Data privacy and the right to be forgotten: The social media challenge. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(6), 1247-1260.

[22] Morrison, D. (2016). The challenges of implementing the right to be forgotten: A search engine perspective. Internet Policy Review, 5(2), 1-18.

[23] Jung, J., &Ahn, J. (2020). The right to be forgotten on social media: A case study of user privacy and content removal. Journal of Information Policy, 10, 80-99.

[24] Shadbolt, N., et al. (2016). Big data and privacy: The challenge of the right to be forgotten. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 723-730.

[25] González Fuster, G., et al. (2017). The emergence of privacy in social media: A study of Facebook and Twitter users. In Privacy and identity management (pp. 123-140). Springer.

[26] De Hert, P., &Papakonstantinou, V. (2016). The right to be forgotten: A comparative study of the legal frameworks in the EU and the US. In Data protection and privacy: The age of the GDPR (pp. 3-24). Hart Publishing.

[27] Google LLC v. NT1 & NT2. (2018). High Court of Justice.

[28] Wright, D. (2019). The right to be forgotten: Balancing privacy and public interest in the UK. European Data Protection Law Review, 5(1), 17-29.

[29] González, M. C. (2020). Privacy in Brazil: The impact of data protection laws on freedom of expression. Journal of Comparative Law, 15(2), 123-145.

[30] Margarit, A. (2018). The right to be forgotten: An analysis of its legal and practical implications. European Journal of Law and Technology, 9(1), 1-24.

[31] Pfitzmann, A., & Hansen, M. (2010). Anonymity, unlinkability, undetectability, and unobservability: A consolidated proposal for terminology. In Privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 1-19). Springer.

[32] Sweeney, L. (2019). Privacy, technology, and the global right to be forgotten: Challenges and opportunities. Internet Policy Review, 8(2), 1-19.

[33] Rosen, J. (2012). The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Review, 64(1), 88-137.

[34] Culnan, M. J., &Bies, R. J. (2003). Managing privacy: The challenge of information technology. California Management Review, 45(3), 24-46.

[1] Students of BA LLB (Intellectual Property Hons.), KIIT School of Law, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha

[2] Viswanath, A. (2020, March 3). Intermediary liability for intellectual property infringement.Tradeamrk- India. https://www.mondaq.com/india/trademark/899230/intermediary-liablity-for-intellectual-property-infringement

[3] Alex Comninos, ‘The liability of internet intermediaries in Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa and Uganda: An uncertain terrain’ (2012) at p6

[5] 2017 Report of the UNSR on Freedom of Expression at para 50

[6] Dalvi, M. (2019, July 26). Intermediary liability and copyright. Copyright - India. https://www.mondaq.com/india/copyright/829986/intermediary-liability-and-copyright

[7] Viswanath, A. (2020, March 3). Intermediary liability for intellectual property infringement. Trademark - India. https://www.mondaq.com/india/trademark/899230/intermediary-liability-for-intellectual-property-infringement

[11] Litman, J. (2020). "The Impact of Cyberspace on Intellectual Property Law: A Comprehensive Analysis." Journal of Copyright Law, 24(3), 15-30.

[12] Boyle, J. (2022). "Copyright Protection in the Digital Age: Challenges and Opportunities." International Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26(1), 45-62.

[13] Gibson, L. (2021). "The Transient Nature of Digital Content: Challenges and Legal Considerations." Journal of Digital Law, 18(2), 78-93

[14] Hugenholtz, P. (2021). "Jurisdictional Complexities in Enforcing Copyright Laws in Cyberspace." International Journal of Cyber Law, 15(4), 102-115.

[15] Bently, T. (2017). "Digital Reproduction Challenges in Copyright Enforcement." Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 30(2), 35-48.

[16] Samuelson, P. (2018). "Global Accessibility and Copyright Enforcement: Bridging Jurisdictional Gaps." Copyright Law Review, 12(4), 55-68.

[17] Litman, J. (2019). "Ephemeral Nature of Digital Content: Tracking and Monitoring Challenges." International Journal of Copyright Law, 23(2), 20-35.

[18] Hugenholtz, P. (2020). "Agile Enforcement Mechanisms for Digital Content Protection." Journal of Digital Rights Management, 15(2), 78-93.

[19] Boyle, J. (2021). "Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): Legal Framework for Addressing Copyright Infringement." Journal of Cyber Law, 17(1), 45-62.

[20] Samuelson, P. (2019). "AI and Copyright Enforcement: Enhancing Detection and Mitigation." Journal of Digital Law, 18(1), 102-115.

[21] Bently, T. (2018). "Technological Protection Measures (TPMs): Balancing Copyright Protection and User Rights." Journal of Digital Rights Protection, 10(1), 35-48.

[22] Litman, J. (2019). "Fair Use and Fair Dealing: Flexibility in Copyright Law." Journal of Copyright Law, 23(3), 55-68.

[23] Samuelson, P. (2018). "Global Accessibility and Copyright Enforcement: Bridging Jurisdictional Gaps." Copyright Law Review, 12(4), 55-68.

[24] Boyle, J. (2021). "Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): Legal Framework for Addressing Copyright Infringement." Journal of Cyber Law, 17(1), 45-62.

[25] Litman, J. (2019). "Ephemeral Nature of Digital Content: Tracking and Monitoring Challenges." International Journal of Copyright Law, 23(2), 20-35.

[26] Hugenholtz, P. (2020). "Agile Enforcement Mechanisms for Digital Content Protection." Journal of Digital Rights Management, 15(2), 78-93

[27] Boyle, J. (2022). "Evolving DRM Strategies: Enhancing Digital Content Protection." Journal of Digital Rights Management, 20(1), 78-93.

[28] Samuelson, P. (2018). "Global Accessibility and Copyright Enforcement: Bridging Jurisdictional Gaps." Copyright Law Review, 12(4), 55-68.

[30] Duggal P, Unsured liability of ISPs under the proposed amended IT Bill 99, http:/cyberlaws.net/cyberindia/ liablity htm (15 May 2007).

[32] MySpace Inc. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd (2017) 236 DLT 478 (50, 51, 53–63, 67, 68, 77).

[33] Joshi, Divij. 2018. “Indian Intermediary Liability Regime: Compliance with the Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability.” Centre for Internet and Society. https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/files/indian-intermediary-liability-regime.

[34] Padmanabhan, Ananth. 2014. “Can Judges Order ISPs to Block Websites for Copyright Infringement.” Centre for Internet and Society. https://cis-india.org/a2k/blogs/john-doe-orders-isp-blocking-websites-copyright-1.

[37] Schuerman E, Internet Service Providers and copyright liability-don’t touch! . . .or at least not too much: Costar v Loopnet, 373 F 3D 544 (4th CIR 2004), Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 30 (2006) 573.

[38] Barger Jt B W, Costar v Loopnet: Protection of the Internet at the expense of copyright protection?, http://jip kentlaw.edw/ art/volume206/6%20Chi-Kent%620J%20Intell%20Prop% 201.doc. Mukherjee S, Liability

[39] Wei W, The liability of Intemet Service Providers for copyright infringement and defamation actions in the United Kingdom and China: A comparative study, European Intellectual Property Review, 28 (10) (2006)

[40] Feist Publications Inc v Rural Tel Serv Co, 499 US 340, 361 (1991). Barger Jt B W, Costar v Loopnet: Protection of the Internet at the expense of copyright protection?, hittp://jip Jeentlaw.edu/art/volume%206/6%20Chi- Kent%20J%20Intell%20Prop%201.doc.

[41] Costar v Loopnet, 373 F 3D 544 (4th CIR 2004).

[42] 17 USC Section 512(K)(1)(A). http:/www4.law.cornell.edw/ uscode/htmliuscodel7/usc_sec_17_00000512----000-html.

[43] 17 USC Section 512(k)(1)(B). http:/www4.law.comell.edw/ uscode/htmliuscodel7/usc_sec_17_00000512----000-html.

[44] Joseph B G & Wasylik D P, Copyright issues on the Internet and the DMCA, Practicing Law Institute-Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series, 2003, 451.

[45] Section 512(d) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

[46] CDA Section 230, Immunity covers state intellectual property-related, tight of publicity claims, http://brownraysman.typepad.conv'technology_law_update/2 007/04/cda_section_230.html#more

b Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under The Law Inc v Craigslist Inc, Case No. 06 C 0657 (N D IIL, 14 November ~ 2006) in Online Defamation/Libel/ Communications Decency Act-Intemet library of law and court decisions, http:/wwiw.internetlibrary.comy/topics/ online_defamation.cfn

[48] Playboy Enterprises Inc v Frena, 839 F Supp 1552 (MD Fla 1993).

[49] Religious Technology Center v Netcom, 907 F Supp 1361 (N D Cal 1995), http:/www.tomwbell.com/NetLaw/Ch07/ Religious-C.html (17 May 2007).

[50] Mukherjee S, Liability of Intemet Service Providers for copyright infringement on the Internet: US vis-vis Indian position, http://www.legalservicesindia.comvarticles/ isp_in_us.htm

[53] 17 USC § 512(1)(1)(B). http://wwwi.law.comell.edwuscode/ html/uscode] 7/use_sec_17_00000512--000-html (27 August 2007). Mercurio B, Internet Service Provider Liability for copyright infringements of subscribers: A comparison of the American and Australian efforts to combat the uncertainty, http://www.murdoch.edu.awelaw/ issues/vond/mercuriods. html (9 May 2007). Francisco Castro, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Provisions on circumventing protection systems and limiting liability of service providers, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 3 (2004) 3.

[54] 17 USC § 512(g). http://www4.law.cornell edw/uscode/html/ uscodel7/use_sec_17_00000512--000-html

^{^[1]} Y.P. Bhagat, Kumar Keshav & Ranjeeta Singh, Commentary on The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Vinod Publications (P.) Ltd. 2022).

^{^[2]} Henry Maine, Ancient Law (J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., London, introduced by Prof. J.H. Morgan), available at http://www.loyalbooks.com/download/text/Ancient-Law-by-Sir-Henry-Sumner-Maine.txt.

^{^[4]} Tharanath & Vinaya V.S., Land Ownership and Land Acquisition Regime in India, 11 Int'l J. Humanities & Soc. Sci. Invention 101 (2022), available at https://doi.org/10.35629/7722-1112101107.

^{^[6]} Dr. Md. Hamid Husain & Firoj High Sarwar, A Comparative Study of Zamindari, Raiyatwari and Mahalwari Land Revenue Settlements: The Colonial Mechanisms of Surplus Extraction in 19th Century British India, 2 IOSR J. Humanities & Soc. Sci. (2012).

^{^[7]} Simran Arora, Land Acquisition in India, SSRN (Jan. 27, 2017), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906856.

^{^[8]} Janhavi S S, An Overview of Land Acquisition Act and Human Rights Issues, 2 Int'l J. Humanities & Soc. Sci. Invention (Sept. 2013).

^{^[10]} P.K. Sarkar, Law Of Acquisition Of Land In India 1 (Eastern Law House 3d Ed. 2012).

^{^[11]} I.C. Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab 1967 AIR 1643

^{^[12]} Sankari Prasad Vs. Union of India 1951 AIR 458

^{^[13]} Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar Vs. State of Gujarat AIR 1995 SUPREME COURT 142

^{^[14]} Hari Krishna Mandir Trust vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3969

^{^[15]} Chanchal Kumbhkar, Land Acquisition in India: A Critical Study Concerning Legal Rights, Academike, available at https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/land-acquisition-in-india-a-critical-study-concerning-legal-rights/.

^{^[16]} Keshavananda Bharati vs. Union of India AIR 1973 SUPREME COURT 1461

^{^[17]} Miverva Mills Vs. Union of India 1980 AIR 1789

^{^[18]} Nakshatra Gujrati, Land Acquisition Act: History & The Need to Strike Down Right to Property, Manupatra Articles (Sept. 20, 2022), available at https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Land-Acquisition-Act-History-The-Need-to-Strike-Down-Right-to-Property.

^{^[19]} Prof. Kahkashan Y. Danyal, Land Acquisition in India - Past and Present, 2016 Jamia L.J., available at Manupatra Articles.

^{^[20]} Property Owners Association Vs. State of Maharashtra 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 855

^{^[21]} State of Karnataka Vs Shri Ranganatha Reddy 1978 AIR 215

^{^[22]} Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Co. vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. 1983 AIR 239

^{^[23]} Mafatal Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India AIRONLINE 1996 SC 1268

[1] Author, Vinayan Singh is an Assistant Professor of Law at Chanderprabhu Jain College of Higher Studies & School of Law.

[2] Sarah Thrust & Josh Estey, DRC's male and female rape survivors share their stories, Aljazeera, (Apr. 15, 2020), https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/drc-male-female-rape-survivors-share-stories-200412123610 314.html

[3] KELLY, John, “I’m a Survivor of Rape and Intimate Partner Violence–And I’m a Man” TIME (2 July 2014),

[4] “Four Women 'Rape' a Man in Jalandhar: Gender-Neutral Laws Are Crying Need of Hour” (FirstpostDecember 4, 2022) accessed March 15, 2023

[6] NALSA V. UNION OF INDIA, Writ Petition (civil) No. 604 of 2013

[10] Sarrel PM, Masters WH. Sexual molestation of men by women. Arch Sex Behav. 1982 Apr;11(2):117-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01541979. PMID: 7125884.

[11] Levin RJ. Sexual arousal--its physiological roles in human reproduction. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2005; 16:154-89. PMID: 16913291

[12] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/cabinet-nod-to-make-rape-gender-neutral-riles-womens-groups/articleshow/15049606.cms

[13] Author links open overlay panel Pamela A Ratner a and others, “Non-Consensual Sex Experienced by Men Who Have Sex with Men: Prevalence and Association with Mental Health” (Patient Education and Counselling April 30, 2002) accessed March 15, 2023

[14] Walker J, Archer J, Davies M. Effects of rape on men: a descriptive analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2005 Feb;34(1):69-80. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-1001-0. PMID: 15772770.

[15] “Apa PsycNet” (American Psychological Association) accessed March 15, 2023

[16] National Legal Services Authority v Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438.

[17] Criminal Justice Society v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 1262/2018 vide its Order dated Nov. 12, 2018.

[18] “Crime in the U.S. 2013” (FBI May 14, 2014) accessed March 15, 2023

[19] Revised Code of Washington, Section 9A.44.010

[20] Branch LS, “Consolidated Federal Laws of Canada, Criminal Code” (Criminal Code March 6, 2023) accessed March 15, 2023

[21] Participation E, “Sexual Offences Act 2003” (Legislation.gov.uk) accessed March 15, 2023

[1] R.k.sinha, transfer of property, 2021 edition, law house publication.

[2] R.k.sinha, transfer of property, 2021 edition, law house publication.

[3] R.k.sinha, transfer of property, 2021 edition, law house publication.

[4] R.k.sinha, transfer of property, 2021 edition, law house publication.

[11] R.k.sinha, transfer of property, 2021 edition, law house publication.

[14] R.k.sinha, transfer of property, 2021 edition, law house publication.

[15] R.k.sinha, transfer of property, 2021 edition, law house publication.

[1] Key Challenges of Fin-Tech, Score Me, https://scoreme.in/challenges-of-fintech, Last Accessed on 6^th October 2024.

[2] Tax Incentives, Tax Guru, https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-incentives-fintech-sector.html, Last Accessed on 7^th October 2024.

[3] Changing Face of Fianancial Services, PWC, https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/consulting/financial-services/fintech/publications/the-changing-face-of-financial-services-growth-of-fintech-in-india-v2.pdf, Last Accessed on 8^th October, 2024.

[5] Digital Banking Units, Indian Express, https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/everyday-explainers/what-are-digital-banking-units-7878178/, Last Visited on 8^th October 2024.

[6] Fintech India, KPMG, https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/FinTech-new.pdf, Last Accessed on 9^th October 2024.

[7] Simplified Tax Structure, Business Standard, https://www.business-standard.com/economy/news/fintech-budget-wishlist-simplified-tax-structures-regulatory-clarity-124071700630_1.html, Last Accessed on 9^th October 2024.

[1] Bryan Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary (8t edn, Thomson &West 2004) 1190

[5] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 289, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India).

[6] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 290, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[7] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 291,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[8] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 292,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[9] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 293, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[10] Ibid Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 293, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[11] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 294, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[12] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 295,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[13] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 296,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[14] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 297,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[15] Ibid, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 297, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[16] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 298, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[17] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 299, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[18] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 300, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[19] Murlidhar Meghraj Loya v. State of Maharashtra 1976 AIR 1929, 1977 SCR (1)

[21] Kasambhai Ardul Rehmanbhai Shaikh v. State of Gujarat & Anr AIR 854 (1980)

[23] Kripal Singh v. State of Haryana (two thousand) (1) ALD(CRI)613

[25] State of Gujrat v. Harchandji Thakor (2005) CRILJ2957

[1] Cybersecurity Crucial for Modern-day Wars: Scindia, Rediff (July 19, 2024), https://money.rediff.com/news/market/cybersecurity-crucial-for-modern-day-wars-scindia/12907320240718.

[2] Madhusudan Sahoo, Technology Bridges Divides, Cyber Security Vital, Says Scindia, (July 19, 2024), https://www.deccanchronicle.com/amp/nation/current-affairs/technology-bridges-divides-cyber-security-vital-says-scindia-1811192.

[3] Mahesh, Proposal_A4, (Nov. 12, 2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/tax/in-tax-decoding-ndcp-noexp.pdf.

[5] Aashish Aryan, OTT not under ambit of Telecom Bill: Ashwini Vaishnaw, The Economic Times (Dec. 23, 2023), https://m.economictimes.com/industry/telecom/telecom-news/ott-not-under-ambit-of-telecom-bill-ashwini-vaishnaw/amp_articleshow/106224226.cms.

[8] Akanksha Nagar, TRAI releases consultation paper on framework for providing telecom service through authorisation, (July 12, 2024), https://www.storyboard18.com/how-it-works/trai-releases-consultation-paper-on-framework-for-providing-telecom-service-through-authorisation-36856.htm.

[9] Mathanki Narayanan, Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India: An Examination of the Supreme Court’s Application of the Doctrine of Proportionality, (May 12, 2024), https://www.calj.in/post/anuradha-bhasin-v-union-of-india-an-examination-of-the-supreme-court-s-application-of-the-doctrine.

[12] Right to internet fundamental for right to education: Faheema Shirin R.K. v. State of Kerala & Ors., Lawsisto Legal News (Oct. 7, 2020), https://lawsisto.com/legalnewsread/ODU5OA==/Right-to-internet-fundamental-for-right-to-education-Faheema-Shirin-RK-v-State-of-Kerala-Ors.

[14] Indiankanoon.Org, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/223504/.

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN: AN EVOLVING RIGHT BY - DR. TANVEER KAUR

NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LABYRINTH: INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS’ LIABILITY ON COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASES BY - SRI PRAGNYA A, OISHANI DEB & ARYAN ROY

MAPPING LAND ACQUISITION JURISPRUDENCE OF INDIA AND THE JUDICIAL INTERVENTIONS RELATING TO IT BY: MR. PRANAV SRI KRISHNA B & MR. MAHALINGAM V

GENDER NEUTRAL RAPE LAWS IN INDIA: A STEP TOWARDS EGALITARIANISM BY - VINAYAN SINGH

FINAL THOUGHTS BY - ADV. AJAY SINGH RATHORE

A STUDY ON MODERN CHALLENGES ON TRADITIONAL CONCEPT OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP BY - MANISHA G. & R. PREETHI

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF INTERSECTION OF TAXATION LAWS AND FIN-TECH STARTUPS IN INDIA BY: KASHISH KHANNA

E-BANKING FRAUDS: UNVEILING THE THREAT OF INSIDER RISKS BY - KRISHANGEE BHATTACHARYYA

PLEA BARGAINING: A TOOL TO NEGOTIATE JUSTICE AND AID THE OVERBURDENED COURTS. BY - RUUHANI THUKRAL

DISCONNECT TO RECONNECT: INDIA’S QUEST FOR BETTER TELECOM LAWS BY - BANSHIKA GUPTA & PRIYANSHI CHAKRABORTY

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[19] Murlidhar Meghraj Loya v. State of Maharashtra 1976 AIR 1929, 1977 SCR (1)

Citation