INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

ANALYSIS OF PROMOTERS IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD BY - NAVEEN.M

Authors: NAVEEN.M

Registration ID: 108542 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8542

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: naveen_ug20@tnnlu.ac.in

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-27523839/ANALYSIS OF PROMOTERS IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD

SYNCHRONIC ELECTIONS: A JURISPRUDENTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE BY - SANIGHDHA

Authors: SANIGHDHA

Registration ID: 108541 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8541

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sn201918@gmail.com

Page No : 09 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-71481783/SYNCHRONIC ELECTIONS: A JURISPRUDENTIAL CONSTITUTI

UNVEILING BID RIGGING: LEGAL PERSPECTIVES AND ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS BY - ANSHU GUPTA & KARTHIKEY SUYAL

Authors: ANSHU GUPTA & KARTHIKEY SUYAL

Registration ID: 108539 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8539 & IJLRA8540

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: Karthikey672@gmail.com & anshug165@gmail.com

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-42624995/UNVEILING BID RIGGING: LEGAL PERSPECTIVES AND ECON

NEED FOR UNIFORM LEGISLATION ON MEDIA ADVERTISEMENTS: AN OVERVIEW OF MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS. (FOCUSSING ON PATANJALI AYURVEDA PRODUCT’S BANNED) BY - JAYANT KUMAR

Authors: JAYANT KUMAR

Registration ID: 108538 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8538

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: jayant_kumar20@hotmail.co.in

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-24746354/NEED FOR UNIFORM LEGISLATION ON MEDIA ADVERTISEMEN

CENSORSHIP VS. FREEDOM: THE BALANCING ACT IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATION BY - AURODEEP NAYAK & UDBHAV KAPLISH

Authors: AURODEEP NAYAK & UDBHAV KAPLISH,

Registration ID: 108536 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8536 & IJLRA8537

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: 2382031@kls.ac.in & 2482090@kls.ac.in

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-39663249/CENSORSHIP VS. FREEDOM: THE BALANCING ACT IN DIGIT

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF MATRIMONIAL REMEDIES UNDER HINDU AND MUSLIM LAWS BY: NAINA SINGH & DOLA GOKUL SAI REDDY

Authors: NAINA SINGH & DOLA GOKUL SAI REDDY

Registration ID: 108534 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8534 & IJLRA8535

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: naina.singh@law.christuniversity.in & dola.sai@law.christuniversity.in

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-89325744/CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF MATRIMONIAL REMEDIES UNDER HI

LEGAL ASPECT OF ONLINE BANKING TRENDS IN INDIA BY - DISHA KALRA

Authors: DISHA KALRA

Registration ID: 108533 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8533

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: dishakalra2000@gmail.com

Page No : 48 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-65379144/LEGAL ASPECT OF ONLINE BANKING TRENDS IN INDIA

SUSCEPTIBLE OUTSIDE THE WOMB: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ON SURROGACY BY - VIDYA M.N

Authors: VIDYA M.N

Registration ID: 108532 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8532

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vidya.mes@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-61383485/SUSCEPTIBLE OUTSIDE THE WOMB: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS

LEGAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON RAPE VICTIMS BY - JYOTHI SHARMA

Authors: JYOTHI SHARMA

Registration ID: 108531 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8531

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: jyothisharma@klelawcollege.org

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-87443489/LEGAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON RAPE VI

CHALLENGING DIVINE PATRIARCHY: IMPACT OF RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM ON CEDAW IMPLEMENTATION AND THE FEMINIST RESPONSE TO GENDER INEQUALITY BY - LIDA LALRAMMAWII

Authors: LIDA LALRAMMAWII

Registration ID: 108530 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8530

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: lidalrm12@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-18428783/CHALLENGING DIVINE PATRIARCHY: IMPACT OF RELIGIOUS

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1] Lagunas Nitrate Company v. Lagunas Syndicate [1899] 2Ch. 392, P. 68

[3] Sarah Worthington, Text Cases & Materials in Company Law 498 (11th ed 2013)

[4] G.K. Kapoor & Sanjay Dhamija, Company Law and Practice, Pg.113.

[7] Lagunas Nitrate Co. v. Lagunas Syndicate (1899) 2 Ch. 392

[8] (1878) 3 App Cas 1218, 48 LJ Ch 73, 27 WR 65, [1874-80]

[9] Harpreet Kaur, “Promoters and Corporate Governance Under the Companies Act, 2013 And Allied Acts In India”, 53-70, 2017

[1] Sanighdha; Junior Research Fellow, Department of Laws, Panjab University, Chandigarh; sn201918@gmail.com.

[2] “Quotes By Founding Fathers and Others on Citizens’ Duties.” Government of India, https://dpe.gov.in/sites/default/files/Quotes_by_founding_fathers.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct.2024.

[3] “India is one the few vibrant democracies in the World, says White House.” Business Standard, https://www.business-standard.com/elections/lok-sabha-election/india-among-the-few-vibrant-democracies-across-world-says-white-house-124051800030_1.html. Accessed 3 Oct.2024.; Mahajan, Kuber. Election Laws in India. Whitesmann Publications, 2020; Chaudhari, Anurag. Elections in India: Issues and Challenges. Whitesmann Publications, 2021; Mahajan, Kuber. Election Laws and Practices in India. Whitesmann Publications, 2024; Malhotra, Manav. Laws of Elections in India. Singhal Law Agency, 2022; Mendiratta SK & Devi Rama. How India Votes: Elections Laws, Procedure and Practice in India. Lexis Nexis, 2017; Quraishi, S.Y. India’s Experiments with Democracy: The life of Nation Through Its Elections. Harper Collins India, 2023; Jaishri Jethawany & Kapur, Samir. When India Votes: The Dynamics of Successful Election Campaigning.

[4] The Constitution of India. The Government of India, 1950.

[5] The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United Nations, 1948; The Constitution of India. The Government of India, 1950.

[6] The Constitution of India. The Government of India, 1950.

[7] “One Nation, One Election.” Government of India, https://onoe.gov.in/. Accessed 3 Oct.2024.

[8] “One Nation, One Election.” Government of India, https://onoe.gov.in/ . Accessed 3 Oct..2024.

[9] The Constitution of India. The Government of India, 1950.

[10] The Constitution of India. The Government of India, 1950.

[11] The Constitution of India. The Government of India, 1950.

[12]“India can Reap its Democratic Dividends by Investing in the Care and Gig Economies.” International Labour Organisation, https://www.ilo.org/node/649796#:~:text=India%20has%20the%20demographic%20dividend,the%20labour%20force%20each%20year. Accessed 3 Oct. 2024; “Cashing in On India’s Demographic Dividend.” Down to Earth, https://www.downtoearth.org.in/governance/cashing-in-on-india-s-demographic-dividend-95568 Accessed 3 Oct. 2024; “India’s High Youth Dividend: High Hopes for Today and Tomorrow.” Gallup News, https://news.gallup.com/poll/509756/india-youth-dividend-high-hopes-today-tomorrow.aspx. Accessed 3 Oct. 2024; “India’s Demographic Dividend: The Key to Unlocking its Global Ambitions.” S&P Global, https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/special-reports/look-forward/india-s-demographic-dividend-the-key-to-unlocking-its-global-ambitions. Accessed 3 Oct. 2024; “Demographic Dividends for India: Evidence and Implications Based on National Transfer Accounts. “Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/demographic-dividends-india-evidence-and-implications-based-national-transfer-accounts. Accessed 3 Oct. 2024.

[15] Das, Pushpita. India’s Internal Security: Role of State Governments. Pentagon Press, 2024.

[1] Safeway Plc and Asda Group Limited (owned by Wal-Mart Stores Inc); Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc; J.Sainsbury Plc; and Tesco Plc, A Report on the Mergers in Contemplation, para 2.88

[2] Dr. Versha Vahini, Textbook on Indian Competition Law 54 (Lexis Nexis 2020)

[3] Northern Pacific Railway Co. v United States, 356 U.S. 1(1958)

[4] The Competition Act, 2002, § 27(b), No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[5] Union of India v Hindustan Development Corporation, 6(1994) CTJ 270 (SC) (MRTP)

[6] The Competition Act, 2002, § 3(3), No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[7] 1 Y V Chandrachud, P. Ramanatha Aiyer’s Advanced Law Lexicon 525 (Wadhwa and Company 2007)

[8] Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 1238 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 11^th Edition., 2004)

[9] Guidelines for Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement, https://www.oecd.org/competition/guidelinesforfightingbidrigginginpublicprocurement.htm (last visited on May 15, 2024)

[11] John M. Connor, Studies in Industrial Organization Global Price Fixing (2^nded. 2008)

[12] United States v Misle Bus & Equipment Co., 967 F.2d 1227

[13] 1 George J. Stigler, “A Theory of Oligopoly”, in Margaret C. Levenstein and Stephen W. Salant (eds.), Cartels 80

(Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2007)

[14] Carl Davidson and Raymond Deneckere, “Excess Capacity and Collusion”, 31(3) IER 521, 525 (1990), https://www.jstor.org/stable/2527159?read-now=1&seq=5#page_scan_tab_contents

[16] US Department of Justice, http://www.usdoj.gov (last visited on May 22, 2024)

[17] The World Bank Group, Annual Report on Investigations and Sanctions of Staff Misconduct and Fraud and Corruption

in Bank-Financed Projects, 2004, https://documents.worldbank.org/en (last visited on May 22,2024)

[18] Kramer Michael, Combating Corruption and Fraud in International Projects, 2000, www.wmkramer.com/3combat.html (last visited on May 22,2024)

[19] Ravindran Pratap, Projecting Corruption in Multilateral Banks, The Hindu Business Line, Internet Edition, January 22,

2004, http://www.blonnet.com (last visited on May 23, 2024)

[20] The Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, Regulation 49, No. 2, 2009 (India)

[21] The Competition Act, 2002, § 19(1), No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[22] The Competition Act, 2002, § 26(1), No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[23] The Competition Act, 2002, § 26(3), No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[24] The Competition Act, 2002, § 27(b), No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[25] The Competition Act, 2002, § 27(b) Proviso, No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[26] The Competition Act, 2002, § 43, No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[27] The Competition Act, 2002, § 33, No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[28] The Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, Regulation 31, No. 2, 2009 (India)

[29] Competition Commission of India v Steel Authority of India Ltd., (2010)10 SCC 744

[30] The Competition Act, 2002, § 53A, No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[31] The Competition Act, 2002, § 53B (2), No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2003 (India)

[32] Brushless DC Fans, Suo Moto Case No. 03 of 2014

[33]Competition Commission of India v. Coordination Committee of Artistes and Technicians of West Bengal Film and Television & Ors., (2017) 5 SCC 17

[34] Rajasthan Cylinders v Union of India, 2020 16 SCC 615

[35] Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. v Commission of European Communities, 1972 ECR 619 (ECJ)

[36] Monsanto Company v Spray-Rite Service Corpn., 1984 SCC OnLine US SC 56

[37] Xyz v Hindalco Industries Ltd. and Anr., 2020 SCC OnLine CCI 39

[38] Chief Material Manager, Northern India Railways v Bic Auto Pvt. Ltd., 2020 SCC OnLine CCI 28

[39] Excel Crop Care Ltd. v Competition Commission of India and Ors, (2017) 8 SCC 47

[40] Western Coal Fields Ltd. v SSV Coal Carriers Pvt. Ltd., 2017 CCI 0795

[19] Smith, J. (2022). The Impact of Geographical Constraints on Research in Censorship. Journal of Media Studies.

[20] Johnson, A., & Lee, R. (2023). Confidentiality and Censorship: Challenges in Data Collection. International Journal of Communication.

[21] Anderson, T. (2024). Emerging Technologies and Their Role in Censorship Practices.

Technology and Society Review.

Brown, L., & Patel, S. (2023). Longitudinal Studies on Public Perception of Censorship. Journal of Social Change.

[2] Sushila Bai v. Prem Narayana, A.I.R. 1985 M.P. 123.

[3] Subbarama Reddiar v. Sakaswathi Ammal, A.I.R. 1967 Mad. 85.

[4] Rohini Kumari v. Narendra Singh, A.I.R. 1972 S.C. 459.

[5] Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav v. Anantrao Shivram Adhav, A.I.R. 1988 S.C. 644.

[7] Abdulaziz Sachedina, ed., Islamic Family Law: Theory and Practice 123 (Oxford Univ. Press 2013).

[9] Junichiro Ishida, The Role of Social Norms in a Model of Marriage and Divorce, 45 J. Econ. Behav. & Org.227 (2001).

[10] Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, AIR 1985 SC 945.

[1] Uppal RK and Jha NK, Online Banking in India (Anmol Publications 2008)

[3] Cashless India, (Oct 21, 2023) cashlessindia.gov.in

[4] Innovation in Banking sector- Challenges&Opportunities, research gate.net,(Oct 21 23.) www.researchgate.net

[10] Anwar, Saleem.,?Maharaja Sayajirao (2021), An Empirical Analysis of Agricultural Finance Provided by Scheduled Public and Private Sector Banks in India in the Post Reform Era (1991-2014)

[11] Evolution of e-banking in India,(Oct 21, 2023) https://geniemoney.co.in/evolution-of-e-banking-in-india/

[14] Immediate Payment Service (IMPS) – What is IMPS Transfer, Timings, and Limit?, (Oct 21, 2023)cleartax.in

¹⁴Ibid note 1.

[15] UPI Product Statistics, npci,org (Oct 20 2023) , www.npci.org.in

[18] Dhruba Kumar Gautam, Online Banking Service Practices and Its Impact on E-Customer Satisfaction and E-Customer Loyalty in Developing Country of South Asia-Nepal (Oct 21, 2023) journals.sagepub.com

[19]Priya Pandey, CYBER CRIME AND ITS CLASSIFICATION, (Oct 21, 2023) https://www.scribd.com/document/380890531/08-chapter-2-1

[20] The Council of Europe’s Cyber Crime treaty

[21] Tenth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of crime and treatment of offenders

[22] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Act of Parliament,2000 (India)

[26] The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Act 45, Act of Parliament

[28] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Act of Parliament,2000 (India)

[29] Mrs. Sucheta Charudutta Dhekane vs Bank of Maharashtra on 9 November 2011

[30] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Act of Parliament,2000 (India)

[31] The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Act 45, Act of Parliament

[32] The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, No. 45, Act of Parliament, 2023

[36] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Act of Parliament,2000 (India)

[38] Volume 2, Bhagtan Gunjan & Pandya Jhanvi, Contemporary Legal Issues in Indian E Banking System, ,2019 ⁴¹Ibid.

[39] The Banking Regulation Act,1949, No.10., Act of Parliament, 1949(India).

[40] The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Act 45, Act of Parliament

[41] The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, No. 45, Act of Parliament, 2023.

[43] The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, No. 45, Act of Parliament, 2023.

[44] The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Act 45, Act of Parliament.

[45] The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, No. 45, Act of Parliament, 2023.

[46] The Negotiable Instruments Act,1881, No. 26, Act of Parliament,1881(India).

[47] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Act of Parliament,2000 (India

[48] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Act of Parliament,2000 (India)

[50] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Act of Parliament,2000 (India)

[51] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Act of Parliament,2000 (India)

[57] Guidelines on Internet Banking facility to Customers of Cooperative banks, rbi.org, Oct 21 2023 https://www.rbi.org.in/hindi1/Upload/content/PDFs/C229260416_1.pdf

[58] The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, No 35, Act of Parliament 2019(India),

^{^[1]} Kristin Lozanski, Transnational surrogacy: Canada's contradictions., 124 SOC. SCI. MED. 383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.003.

^{^[2]} Rozée et. al., The social paradoxes of commercial surrogacy in developing countries: India before the new law of 2018, 20:234 BMC WOMEN'S HEALTH, 9-14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01087-2.

^{^[3]} H. Gottfried, and J. J. Chun, Care Work in Transition: Transnational Circuits of Gender, Migration, and Care, 44(7–8) CRIT. SOCIOL., 997–1012 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920518765931.

^{^[4]} Brianne Richards, "Can I take the Normal One?" Unrelated Commercial Surrogacy and Child Abandonment, 44:1(7) HOFSTRA LAW REV. 203, 212 (2015). (Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2809&context=hlr).

^{^[5]} Kristiana Brugger, International Law in the Gestational Surrogacy Debate, 35(3) FORDHAM INT. LAW J. 672 (2012). (Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2438&context=ilj).

^{^[6]} See Mehpara Haq, Ethical and Moral Issues Concerning Surrogacy, THE RMLNLU LAW REVIEW BLOG (July 31, 2015) https://rmlnlulawreview.com/2015/07/31/ethical-and-moral-issues-concerning-surrogacy/.

^{^[8]} Seema Mohapatra, Adopting an International Convention on Surrogacy- A Lesson from Intercountry Adoption, 13 (1) LOY. U. CHI. INT’L L. REV. 47 (2015). (Available at: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=facultyscholarship).

^{^[9]} International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), art. 24, U.N. Doc. A/6316.

^{^[10]} European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Rome, 4.XI.1950, art. 8.

^{^[11]} UN General Assembly, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the sale and sexual exploitation of children, including child prostitution, child pornography and other child sexual abuse material, 24 January 2017, A/74/162, available at: https://undocs.org/A/74/162 [accessed 09^th November, 2021].

^{^[12]} Act on Children and Parents Code 1949, (SFS 1949:381) Ch. 1-3.

^{^[13]} See Indian Council of Medical Research, National Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision & Regulation of ART Clinics in India, 2005 (Guideline No. 3.5.5.) https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/guidelines/b.pdf. But cf. MoHFW, Instructions regarding Commissioning of Surrogacy, (Notification dated November 4, 2015) at https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/art/Document.pdf. (Whereby transnational surrogacy by foreign nationals in India has been wholly prohibited). See also Baby Manji Yamada vs. Union of India and Another, (2008) 13 SCC 518 (wherein the Apex Court had iterated the absence of adequate framework governing surrogacy in India).

^{^[14]} Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985, (c. 49, §2).

^{^[15]} Embryo Protection Act 1990, (Part I, No. 69).

^{^[16]} Mennesson v. France, No. 65192/11 ECHR 2014. See also PJS v. News Group Newspapers [2016] UKSC 26.

^{^[18]} Docket No. XII ZB 530/17, rev’d, 15 W 413/16.

^{^[1]} Candace Kruttschnitt et al., Legal Definitions and Context, in Estimating the Incidence of Rape and Sexual Assault (2014), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK202259/ (last visited Oct 12, 2024).

^{^[2]} Busra Yalcinoz-Ucan & Hande Eslen-Ziya, Disclosing Gender-Based Violence Online: Strengthening Feminist Collective Agency or Creating Further Vulnerabilities?, 24 Feminist Media Studies 1186 (2024), https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14680777.2023.2229060 (last visited Oct 12, 2024).

^{^[3]} Pavel, #MeToo: A Political Issue in India’s Digital Presence, Research Outreach (Aug. 25, 2023), https://researchoutreach.org/articles/metoo-political-issue-indias-digital-presence/ (last visited Oct 12, 2024).

^{^[4]} Nicole Henry & Anastasia Powell, Sexual Violence in the Digital Age: The Scope and Limits of Criminal Law, 25 Soc. & Legal Stud. 397 (2016).

^{^[5]} Michael Salter, Justice and Revenge in Online Counter-Publics: Emerging Responses to Sexual Violence in the Age of Social Media, 9 Crime, Media & Culture 225 (2013).

^{^[6]} Kaitlynn Mendes, Jessica Ringrose & Jessalyn Keller, #MeToo and the Promise and Pitfalls of Challenging Rape Culture through Digital Feminist Activism, 26 Eur. J. Women’s Stud. 419 (2019).

^{^[7]} Kaaren Lumsden & Heather Morgan, Media, Victimisation, and Social Harm, 12 Victims & Offenders 302 (2017).

^{^[8]} Samuel Adams & Teresa Brunton, Social Media, Privacy, and the Courts: Navigating Legal and Ethical Boundaries, 15 J. Soc. Media L. 201 (2020).

^{^[9]} Rachel Gillingham, Public Shaming in the Digital Age: Legal Protections for Rape Victims, 40 Law & Soc. Inquiry 299 (2015).

^{^[10]} Tanya King, When #MeToo Becomes #NotYou: Analyzing the Negative Social Impacts of Social Media on Sexual Assault Survivors, 115 Feminist Rev. 149 (2017).

^{^[11]} Robin Kowalski, Susan Limber & Patricia Agatston, Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age (Wiley-Blackwell 2012).

^{^[12]} Rebecca Williams, Sexual Violence and the Internet: Legal Challenges and Solutions, 15 Int'l J. Cyber L. 207 (2018).

^{^[13]} Kathleen Richardson, Digital Justice: Social Media and the Legal Framework for Rape Survivors, 26 Women & Crim. Just. 312 (2016).

^{^[14]} Anastasia Powell & Nicole Henry, The Digital Abuse of Sexual Violence Survivors, 1 J. Gender, Tech. & Violence 5 (2016).

^{^[15]} Lauren Marshall, Social Media and Sexual Assault: The Legal Fallout, 104 Cornell L. Rev. 233 (2019).

^{^[16]} Alyssa Burrows, Privacy and Public Shaming: The Legal Consequences for Rape Survivors, 9 J. Soc. Media Ethics 99 (2018).

^{^[17]} Heather Hlavka, Normalizing Sexual Violence: Young Women Account for Harassment and Abuse, 28 Gender & Soc’y 337 (2014).

^{^[18]} Pavel, #MeToo: A Political Issue in India’s Digital Presence, Research Outreach (Aug. 25, 2023), https://researchoutreach.org/articles/metoo-political-issue-indias-digital-presence/ (last visited Oct 12, 2024).

^{^[19]} Pavel, #MeToo: A Political Issue in India’s Digital Presence, Research Outreach (Aug. 25, 2023), https://researchoutreach.org/articles/metoo-political-issue-indias-digital-presence/ (last visited Oct 12, 2024).

^{^[20]} Pavel, #MeToo: A Political Issue in India’s Digital Presence, Research Outreach (Aug. 25, 2023), https://researchoutreach.org/articles/metoo-political-issue-indias-digital-presence/ (last visited Oct 12, 2024).

ANALYSIS OF PROMOTERS IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD BY - NAVEEN.M

SYNCHRONIC ELECTIONS: A JURISPRUDENTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE BY - SANIGHDHA

UNVEILING BID RIGGING: LEGAL PERSPECTIVES AND ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS BY - ANSHU GUPTA & KARTHIKEY SUYAL

NEED FOR UNIFORM LEGISLATION ON MEDIA ADVERTISEMENTS: AN OVERVIEW OF MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS. (FOCUSSING ON PATANJALI AYURVEDA PRODUCT’S BANNED) BY - JAYANT KUMAR

CENSORSHIP VS. FREEDOM: THE BALANCING ACT IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATION BY - AURODEEP NAYAK & UDBHAV KAPLISH

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF MATRIMONIAL REMEDIES UNDER HINDU AND MUSLIM LAWS BY: NAINA SINGH & DOLA GOKUL SAI REDDY

LEGAL ASPECT OF ONLINE BANKING TRENDS IN INDIA BY - DISHA KALRA

SUSCEPTIBLE OUTSIDE THE WOMB: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ON SURROGACY BY - VIDYA M.N

LEGAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON RAPE VICTIMS BY - JYOTHI SHARMA

CHALLENGING DIVINE PATRIARCHY: IMPACT OF RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM ON CEDAW IMPLEMENTATION AND THE FEMINIST RESPONSE TO GENDER INEQUALITY BY - LIDA LALRAMMAWII

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation