INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

APPLICATION OF ALIEN TORT STATUTE: IN NESTLÉ USA, INC. V. DOE BY - ANANYA RAKHEJA

Authors: ANANYA RAKHEJA

Registration ID: 108338 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8338

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: ananyarakheja@gmail.com

Page No : 09 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-49243542/APPLICATION OF ALIEN TORT STATUTE: IN NESTLÉ USA,

e

MARITAL RAPE IN INDIA BY - ROZY BAIDYA & PRITHWISH GANGULI

Authors: ROZY BAIDYA & PRITHWISH GANGULI

Registration ID: 108335 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8335 & IJLRA8336

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: rozybaidya2002@gmail.com & prithwishganguli@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-98775128/MARITAL RAPE IN INDIA

IMPACT OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY IN INSTITUTIONALIZING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN GOVERNANCE BY - DINESH KUMAR MISHRA

Authors: DINESH KUMAR MISHRA

Registration ID: 108334 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8334

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: mdineshmishra023@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-29827655/IMPACT OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY IN INSTITUTIONALIZ

DEATH PENALTY AND ITS EVOLUTION IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM: A CRITICAL STUDY BY - DR. SATYA BRAT

Authors: DR. SATYA BRAT

Registration ID: 108333 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8333

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: satya007brat@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-84127913/DEATH PENALTY AND ITS EVOLUTION IN THE INDIAN LEGA

ANIMAL WELFARE LAWS AND CRUELTY PREVENTION BY - ABHIJIT GORAKH ANANTKAR & KAUSTUBH MARUTI MURKUTE

Authors: ABHIJIT GORAKH ANANTKAR & KAUSTUBH MARUTI MURKUTE

Registration ID: 108331 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8331 & IJLRA8332

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: abhijitanantkar7@gmail.com & kaustubhmurkute558@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-56346514/ANIMAL WELFARE LAWS AND CRUELTY PREVENTION

THE VALUE OF DISSENTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH THE AMERICAN JURIST ANTONIN SCALIA’S LENSES BY: AASHKA VYAS

Authors: AASHKA VYAS

Registration ID: 108330 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8330

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: 20jgls-avyas@jgu.edu.in

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-93856139/THE VALUE OF DISSENTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDI

PRIVACY IN THE DIGITAL ERA: LEGAL RESPONSES TO TECHNOLOGICAL DISRUPTIONS BY - NAMRATA N WAGHMARE & PRAJAKTA PIMPALSHINDE

Authors: NAMRATA N WAGHMARE & PRAJAKTA PIMPALSHINDE

Registration ID: 108327 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8328 & IJLRA8329

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: namratawaghmare2498@gmail.com

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-62811418/PRIVACY IN THE DIGITAL ERA: LEGAL RESPONSES TO TEC

AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF INHERITANCE LAWS IN ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE: TRADITION, INTERPRETATION, AND CONTEMPORARY APPLICATION BY - TUSHAR KAUSHIK

Authors: TUSHAR KAUSHIK

Registration ID: 108327 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8327

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: tusharkaushik22008@rgnul.ac.in

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-68681116/AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF INHERITANCE LAWS IN ISLAMIC

CASE COMMENTARY ON VISHAKA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN BY - VAISHNAVI SINGH

Authors: VAISHNAVI SINGH

Registration ID: 108326 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8326

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vaishnavisinghs2601@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-87342176/CASE COMMENTARY ON VISHAKA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1] Mehta, M. and Vogt, J. (2022) ‘Nestle v. Doe: Supreme Court deals setback to forced child laborers, but US corporations lose bid for alien tort statute immunity’, International Labor Rights Case Law, 8(1), pp. 63–67.

[2] Hlr (2023) Doe I V. Nestle, S.A., Harvard Law Review. Available at: https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-133/doe-i-v-nestle-s-a/#footnote-ref-2 (Accessed: 20 January 2024).

[8] Stephen P. Mulligan, Cong. Research Serv., R44947, The Alien Tort Statute (ATS): A Primer 6–7 (2018)

[11] Hlr (2023) Doe I V. Nestle, S.A., Harvard Law Review. Available at: https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-133/doe-i-v-nestle-s-a/#footnote-ref-2 (Accessed: 20 January 2024).

[12] Short, A.K. (no date) Is the alien tort statute sacrosanct--retaining forum non conveniens in Human Rights Litigation, Texas A&M Law Scholarship. Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/193/

[1] TRIPATHI P, ‘The Growing Role of Blockchain in Indian Governance’ (orfonline.org, 27 November 2023) www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/the-growing-role-of-blockchain-in-indian-governance> accessed 16 March 2024

[3] Srivastava H, ‘Blockchain Technology: Transforming Transparency, Security and Accountability in Law’ Reader’s Blog (Delhi, 23 June 2023) 3

[7] ‘Exploring Blockchain Technology for Government Transparency: Blockchain-Based Public Procurement to Reduce Corruption’ (2020) <www.weforum.org>.

[8] ‘ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY IN GOVERNANCE’ (2022) <www.dmeo.gov.in>.

[9] Jiaying Christine Jiang, ‘Regulating Blockchain? An Ex-Post Regulatory Impact Assessment of the U.S. Blockchain Regulatory Regime’ (2022) 8 Source: Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare 5

[10] Raffi Teperdjian, ‘THE PUZZLE OF SQUARING BLOCKCHAIN WITH THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION’ (2020) 60 253.

[12] Rafael Miranda’s vision for transparent and accountable governance (no date) FasterCapital. Available at: https://fastercapital.com/content/Rafael-Miranda-s-Vision-for-Transparent-and-Accountable-Governance.html (Accessed: 16 March 2024).

[13] Kevin Werbach, ‘Trust, but Verify’ (2018) 33 Technology Law Journal 487.

[14] Pelin Zorlu, ‘Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Transforming the Financial System for Delivering Sustainable Development: A High-Level Overview’.

[16] A Balan and others, ‘Transparency and Accountability in Urban Public Procurement: Design of a Self- Sovereign Blockchain App’, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives (International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2020).

[19] Muhammad Ibrahim Khan, ‘Impact of Blockchain Technology on Transparency and Trust in Programmatic Advertising Supply Chain’ (2024).

[21] A Balan and others, ‘Transparency and Accountability in Urban Public Procurement: Design of a Self- Sovereign Blockchain App’, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives (International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2020).

[22] Sergi Nin Sánchez, ‘The Implementation of Decentralised Ledger Technologies for Public Procurement’ (2019) 14 180.

[1]J. P. S. Siiohi, Criminology and Criminal Administration. 4^th ed., (1992), p.109

[2]K .D . Gaur, Commentary on the Indian Penal Code, p.l61

[1]Available at http://in.rediff.com/movies/2008/jun/25look.htm last seen on 16/8/2024

[2]Available at https://www.petaindia.com/blog/dia-mirza-urges-fans-shed-skins/ last seen on 16/8/2024.

[3]Sharma, R. (2018). Animal welfare activism in India: A critical analysis. Society & Animals, 26(2), 123-145.

[4] Kavuri, A. (2020). India's Legal Framework for Animal Protection: A Comprehensive Analysis. Oxford University Press.

[6] Animal Welfare Board of India vs A. Nagaraja & Or’s on 7 May, 2014

[8] S. 2, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

[9] S. 3, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

[10]S.11, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

[11]S.14, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

[12] S. 28, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

[1] Antonin Scalia, The Dissenting Opinion, 1994 J. Sup. CT. Hist. 33 (1994).

[7] In re: Delhi Laws Act, 1912, (1951) SCR 747 (Mukherjea, J., & Bose, J., dissenting).

[8] Rajnarain Singh v. Chairman, Patna Administration Committee, (1955) 1 SCR 290.

[10] S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, (1994) 3 SCC 1.

[15] Young Indian Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (Sabrimala Case), (2019) 11 SCC 1 (Indu Malhotra, J., dissenting).

[17] K.S. Puttuswamy v. Union of India (Aadhaar Case), (2019) 1 SCC 1 (D.Y. Chandrachud, J., dissenting).

[18] Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).

[20] The National Identification and Registration Act, Acts of Parliament, 2017 (Jamaica).

[21] A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak & Anr., (1988) 2 SCC 602 (Venkatachalaiah, J., dissenting).

[26] Shayara Bano v. Union of India (Triple Talaq Case), (2017) 9 SCC 1 (Khehar, J., & Nazeer, J., dissenting).

[28] Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, Acts of Parliament, 2019 (India).

[30] Kharak Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors., (1964) 1 SCR 332 (Subba Rao, J., dissenting).

[31] Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla (ADM Jabalpur Case), (1976) 2 SCC 521 (Khanna, J., dissenting).

[33] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Ors., (1978) 1 SCC 248.

[34] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (Right to Privacy Case), (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[35] Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA), Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India).

[39] Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India (Same-Sex Marriage Case), 2023 INSC 920 (D.Y. Chandrachud, J., & S.K. Kaul, J., dissenting).

[45] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[46] I.C. Golaknath & Ors. v. State of Punjab, (1967) 2 SCR 762 (Bachawat, J., dissenting).

[47] A.K. Gopalan v. The State of Madras, (1950) 1 SCR 88 (Fazl Ali, J., dissenting), Justice Fazl Ali incorporated the understanding that Article 21 is inclusive of basic principles of natural justice and human rights.

[48] R.C. Cooper v. Union of India, (1970) 3 SCR 530, the Supreme Court held that the word ‘personal liberty’ would not only include Article but also will come under the ambit of the six fundamental freedoms given under Article 19 (1).

[49] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Ors., (1978) 1 SCC 248.

[50] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (Right to Privacy Case), (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[2] Digital Privacy and Data Protection Laws in India, The Amikus Quriae, available at https://theamikusqriae.com/digital-privacy-and-data-protection-laws-in-india/, last seen on 21/08/2024

[3] What is Digital Privacy and its Importance, IEEE Digital Privacy, available at

https://digitalprivacy.ieee.org/publications/topics/what-is-digital-privacy-and-its-importance, last seen on 24/8/2024

[4] Palmer, D.E., 2005, “Pop-ups, cookies, and spam: toward a deeper analysis of the ethical significance of internet marketing practices”, Journal of business ethics, 58(1–3): 271–280(2005).

[5] Steven Bellman, Eric J. Johnson, Gerald L. Lohse, Communications of the ACM, Volume 44, Number 2, The ACM Digital Library, Pages 25-27(2001)

[6] Privacy and Information Technology, Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/it-privacy/#DevInfTec, last seen on 23/08/2024

[7] Dechesne, F., M. Warnier, & J. van den Hoven, Ethics and Information Technology, available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-013-9326-1, last seen on 26/08/2024

[8] St´ephanie Delaune, Steve Kremer, Mark Ryan, Coercion-Resistance and Receipt-Freeness in Electronic Voting, 5,6(2008)

[10] Gobind vs State of MP, 1975 AIR 1378, 1975 SCR (3) 946

[11] PUCL vs Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 568 / (1997) 1 SSC

[12] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

[13] Prabhash K Dutta, Right to Privacy: 5 bills yet no law, how Parliament has dealt with personal data protection, India Today, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/right-to-privacy-fundamental-right-parliament/1/1032794.html last seen on 29/08/2024

[14] Privacy and The Supreme Court, The Times of India, August 25, 2017

[15] Cyber Law and Data Governance, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, available at https://www.meity.gov.in/cyber-security, last seen on 27/08/2024

^[1] The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act, 1937, No. 26 of 1937, s2.

^[2] The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act, 1937, No. 26 of 1937.

^[3] Kimber, Richard. “The Qur?anic Law of Inheritance.” Islamic Law and Society, vol. 5, no. 3, 1998, pp. 291–325.

^[4] Rashid, K. (1979) Muslim law. Lucknow: Eastern Book.

^[5] Russell, A.D. and Suhrawardy, A. al-Mamun (2008) Muslim law: An historical introduction to the law of inheritance. London: Routledge.

^[6] The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act, 1937, No. 26 of 1937.

^[8] Anderson, J. N. D. “Recent Reforms in the Islamic Law of Inheritance.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 2, 1965, pp. 349–65.

^[9] Subramanian, Narendra. “Legal Change and Gender Inequality: Changes in Muslim Family Law in India.” Law & Social Inquiry, vol. 33, no. 3, 2008, pp. 631–72.

^[10] The Special Marriage Act, 1954, No.43 of 1954.

^[11] Indian Succession Act, 1925, No. 39 of 1925.

^[12] Abdul Majid Khan Sahib v. Krishnamachariar AIR 1918 MADRAS 1049.

^[13] Imambandi v. Sheikh Haji Mutsaddi AIR 1918 PC 11.

^[14] Illyas and Ors. v. Badshah alias Kamala 1989 SCC OnLine MP 175.

^[15] Mohammed Gani v. Parthamuthu Sowra 2008 SCC OnLine 134.

^[16] Rijia Bibi and Ors. v. Abdul Kachem and Anr. AIR. 2013 Gau 34.

[1] Vishaka v State of Rajasthan [ 1997 ] 6 SCC 241

[2] Article 14, Constitution Of India , (Right to Equality)

[3] Article 19(1)(G) Constitution of India , (Right to Practice Ones Profession)

[5] The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.

[7] UN General Assembly, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, 18 December 1979, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1249, p. 13

APPLICATION OF ALIEN TORT STATUTE: IN NESTLÉ USA, INC. V. DOE BY - ANANYA RAKHEJA

e

MARITAL RAPE IN INDIA BY - ROZY BAIDYA & PRITHWISH GANGULI

IMPACT OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY IN INSTITUTIONALIZING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN GOVERNANCE BY - DINESH KUMAR MISHRA

DEATH PENALTY AND ITS EVOLUTION IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM: A CRITICAL STUDY BY - DR. SATYA BRAT

ANIMAL WELFARE LAWS AND CRUELTY PREVENTION BY - ABHIJIT GORAKH ANANTKAR & KAUSTUBH MARUTI MURKUTE

THE VALUE OF DISSENTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH THE AMERICAN JURIST ANTONIN SCALIA’S LENSES BY: AASHKA VYAS

PRIVACY IN THE DIGITAL ERA: LEGAL RESPONSES TO TECHNOLOGICAL DISRUPTIONS BY - NAMRATA N WAGHMARE & PRAJAKTA PIMPALSHINDE

AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF INHERITANCE LAWS IN ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE: TRADITION, INTERPRETATION, AND CONTEMPORARY APPLICATION BY - TUSHAR KAUSHIK

CASE COMMENTARY ON VISHAKA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN BY - VAISHNAVI SINGH

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation