INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

BALANCING TRADITION AND ANIMAL WELFARE: A CRITICAL ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD OF INDIA V. NAGARAJA & ORS (2014) 7 SCC 547 BY: AMANDA JESSICA FERNANDES & GAURAV SHAKTINATH MISHRA

Authors : AMANDA JESSICA FERNANDES & GAURAV SHAKTINATH MISHRA

Registration ID : 108062 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8062 & IJLRA8063

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : amandajferns11@gmail.com & gmishra061@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-24988126/BALANCING TRADITION AND ANIMAL WELFARE: A CRITICAL

THE IMPACT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LEGALIZATION: EXAMINING THE BROADER ISSUE OF LGBTQ+ RIGHTS AND EQUALITY BY - KHUSHI DIXIT

Authors : KHUSHI DIXIT

Registration ID : 108061 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8061

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : dixitkhushi9295@gmai.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-99779877/THE IMPACT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LEGALIZATION: EXAM

A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTORAL POLITICS IN INDIA BY- SAKSHI, TUSHAR SHARMA, SANJANA PRAJAPATI & ASHUTOSH NAYAK

Authors : SAKSHI, TUSHAR SHARMA, SANJANA PRAJAPATI & ASHUTOSH NAYAK

Registration ID : 108057 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8057, IJLRA8058, IJLRA8059 & IJLRA8060

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : sakshidadwal011@gmail.com, tushar615sharma@gmail.com, sanjanaprajapatibharat@gmail.com & ashutosh9937058124@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-46177918/A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTORAL POLITICS IN IN

SEX OR RAPE? THE DIFFERENCE IS CONSENT BY - JAI RANI.S.M & JAYASRI JAGANATHAN

Authors : JAI RANI.S.M & JAYASRI JAGANATHAN

Registration ID : 108055 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8055 & IJLRA8056

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : smjairani@gmail.com & jaysrijaganathan12@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-57158859/SEX OR RAPE? THE DIFFERENCE IS CONSENT

DIGITAL ETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY - SUNANDA DAS

Authors : SUNANDA DAS

Registration ID : 108054 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8054

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : hp2020ss008@stud.tiss.edu

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-27969539/DIGITAL ETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS

MISUSE OF WOMEN CENTRIC LAWS IN INDIA BY - AANCHAL GUPTA

Authors : AANCHAL GUPTA

Registration ID : 108053 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8053

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : 2003aanchalgupta@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-91448513/MISUSE OF WOMEN CENTRIC LAWS IN INDIA

GLOBAL METAMORPHOSIS IN THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS PANOPTIC IMPLICATION IN REALM OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - ADEEB BAKHTAVAR & ARSHIKA SHEORAN

Authors : ADEEB BAKHTAVAR & ARSHIKA SHEORAN

Registration ID : 108052 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8051 & IJLRA8052

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : adeebbakhtavar31@gmail.com & arshikasheoran12@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-73867927/GLOBAL METAMORPHOSIS IN THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK O

AI IN TAXATION: REDEFINING ADMINISTRATION AND COMPLIANCE BY - NIYATI SRIVASTAVA

Authors : NIYATI SRIVASTAVA

Registration ID : 108050 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8050

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : niyati.srivastava@symlaw.edu.in

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-55666667/AI IN TAXATION: REDEFINING ADMINISTRATION AND COMP

THE IMPACT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES ON ARBITRATION BY: - SATYA VRAT PANDEY

Authors : SATYA VRAT PANDEY

Registration ID : 108049 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8049

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : pandeysatyavrat63@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-21312349/THE IMPACT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES ON ARBITRATION

“Revolutionizing Crime Scene Investigations”: Drone Forensics by - Vanshita Srivastava

Authors : Vanshita Srivastava

Registration ID : 108048 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8048

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id :srivastavavanshita04@gmail.com

Page No :17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1]Challenge to the Practice of Jallikattu, Supreme Court Observer, https://www.scobserver.in/cases/challenge-to-the-practice-of-jallikattu/ (visited May 1, 2024).

[2]Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, No. 59 of 1960, India Code (1960)

[3]Animal Welfare Board of India v. Nagaraja, (2014) 7 SCC 547 (India).

[4]Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, No. 59 of 1960, § 11(m)

[6]Jallikattu, Traditional Practice in Tamil Nadu, India

[7]Jallikattu" Movement and Cultural Identity: The Mobilising Structure of Media Paradigm and its Dimensions, 25 Int'l J. Commun. 123 (2023).

[8]T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 8 SCC 481 (India)

[9]Ajay Marathe v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2022 SCC Online Bom 1234 (India).

[10] People for Ethical Treatment of Animals, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), https://www.peta.org (visited May 6^th, 2024).

[2] "53% of Adults in India Support Legalisation of Same-Sex Marriages, Finds Pew Research Center," The Wire (Publication Date not available), https://thewire.in/lgbtqia/53-of-adults-in-india-support-legalisation-of-same-sex-marriages-finds-pew-research-center.

[3] "Analysis: Same-Sex Marriage in India," Legal Service India (Publication Date not available), https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-8025-analysis-same-sex-marriage-in-india.html.

[4] "Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India: Constitutionality of Section 377 IPC - Background," Supreme Court Observer (Publication Date not available), https://www.scobserver.in/cases/navtej-singh-johar-v-union-of-india-constitutionality-of-section-377-ipc-background.

[4] (Sharma R. , n.d.), (Pathak Sikha, 2015), (Herald D. , 2024), (Ace, n.d.).

[1]J. E. Hasday, Contest and Consent: A Legal History of Marital Rape, California Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 5 (Oct., 2000)

[2]D. E. H. Russel, Rape in Marriage, New York 1982

[3] Aneta Michalska-Warias, Marital Rape in Poland from the Legal and Criminological Perspectives, Prawo W DZia?aniu, Sprawy Karne, 26/2016

[4] See, Judgements of Justice Hale, recorded in “History of the Pleas of the Crown”, D. E. H. Russel, Rape in Marriage, New York 1982, Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against Wives: A Case against the Patriarchy. New York, NY: Free Press

[6] Raquel Kennedy Bergen, Wife Rape, Understanding the Response of Survivors and Service Providers, Sage Publications, 1996.

[9]Harsh Mahaseth, Nepal’s Parliament raises punishment for marital rape – but differentiates,South Asia Journal, https://southasiajournal.net/nepals-parliament-raises-punishment-for-marital-rape-but-differentiates/ (23-02-2024, 21.03 P.M.)

[11] Report on Nepal: Contribution for the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women to the Human Rights Council, 2020.

[14]Forced rape – where the husband forces himself upon his wife

[15]Battering Rape – where the husband beats his wife while raping her

[16]Combined Force-Battery Rape – where the husband uses both force and battery on his wife.

[17]Sadistic Rape – where the husband does all kind of perverse, strange and torturous act towards his wife

[18]Suchita Srivastava & Anr. vs. Chandigarh Administration, 2009 (9) SCC 1

[19] Section 63 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, No. 45 of 2023.

[20]Nimeshbhai Bharatbhai Desai vs State Of Gujarat, 2018 SCC OnLine Guj. 73227

[1] Bhajan Lal v. State of Haryana, 1992 AIR 604, 1990 SCR Supply (3) 259

[2] Manav Adhikar v. Union of India Social Action Forum (2018) Lrs.: (1989). 2 SCC 754

[3] State of Bihar v. Arnesh Kumar (2014) AIR 2014 SC 2756

[4] Union of India v. Independent Thought (2017) 10 SCC 800

[5] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, § 125, Acts of Parliament, 1973 (India)

[6] Special Marriage Act, 1954, § 37, Acts of Parliament, 1954 (India)

[7] Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, § 18, Act No. 78 of 1956

[8] Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, § 3, Act No. 25 of 1986 Divorce Act, 1869, § 37, Act No. 4 of 1869

[9] AIR 1975 SC 1534, (1975) 2 SCC 326, 1975 3 SCR 967

^{^[2]} Frank Zhou, Summer Sun, Summer Sun, "China Regulates AI in Life Science," International Bar Association

^{^[3]} Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, White House, October 2022, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Blueprint-for-an-AI-Bill-of-Rights.pdf

^{^[4]} https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence

^{^[5]} Scharre, Paul, et al. “What Is Artificial Intelligence?” ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: What Every Policymaker Needs to Know, Center for a New American Security, 2018, pp. 4–9. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20447.5.

^{^[6]} Shavell, Steven. “Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Economic Analysis.” vol. 24, The Journal of Legal Studies, no. 1, 1995, pp. 1–28. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/724588.

^{^[7]} Medeiros, Maya, and Centre for International Governance Innovation. “Public and Private Dimensions of AI Technology and Security.” MODERN CONFLICT AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, Centre for International Governance Innovation, 2020, pp. 20–25. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep27510.6.

^{^[8]} Arno R. Lodder and John Zeleznikow, ‘Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Systems in a Three Step Mode’ (2005) 10 Harvard Negotiation Law Review

^{^[9]} Tara Vasdani, ‘From Estonian AI judges to robot mediators in Canada, U.K.’ (Law 360 Canada, 13 June 2019) <https://www.law360.ca/articles/12997/ from-estonian-ai-judges-to-robot-mediators-in-canada-u-k->

^{^[10]} Mansi Jain Garg, AI and Mediation: A Threat or Helpful Tool for Mediators - An Indian Perspective, 3.4 JCLJ (2023) 175

^{^[11]} Azael Socorro Marquez, ‘Can Artificial Intelligence be used to appoint arbitrators?’ (2020) Anuario Venezolano de Arbitraje Nacional e Internacional <https://avarbitraje.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ ANAVI-No1-A12-pp-249-272.pdf>

^{^[12]} State v. Loomis, 881 N.W. 2d 749, 66, 68 (Wis. 2016).

^{^[13]} Joe Forward, The Loomis Case : The Use of Proprietary Algorithms at Sentencing, State Bar Of Wisconsin, Oct. 14, 2018,, https : //www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/InsideTrack/Pages/Article.aspx?Volume=9&Issue=14&ArticleID=25730.

^{^[14]} “Why Smart Contracts are Valid under Existing Law and do not Require Additional Authorization to be Enforceable”, Chamber of Digital Commerce, January 2018, <https://digitalchamber.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Smart-Contracts-Legal-Primer-02.01.2018.pdf>

^{^[15]} Supreme Court of India (2017), “Court News : January to March 2017”, Supreme Court of India, vol. 12 : 1.

^{^[16]} B.D. Agarwal, “Judiciary and Underinvestigation Prisoners (UIPS)”, (2014) 3 SCC J-1

^{^[18]} Mediation Act 2023, No. 32 of 2023, 2023, https://www.arbitrationindia.com/pdf/medact.pdf

^{^[20]} Press Information Bureau, Government of India, https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1776202 ( Feb. 13, 2024)

[1] Cristina Garcia-Herrera Blanco, The use of Artificial Intelligence by tax administrations, a matter of principles, CIAT (INTER AMERICAN CENTER OF TAX ADMINISTRATIONS), ( June 19, 2024, 7:23 PM), https://www.ciat.org/the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-by-tax-administrations-a-matter-of-principles/?lang=en

[2]Artificial Intelligence in taxation. Available at: https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/assets/documents/ai-case-study-taxation.pdf (Accessed: 19 June 2024).

[3] Alessia Fidelangeli, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Law: Perspectives and Challenges, Issue 4, Dec 2021

[4] Andrew Ifesinachi Daraojimba, The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Tax Compliance and Financial Regulation, Vol 6, Issue 2, P. No. 241-251, (2024)

[1] Sudeep Srivastava, “Integration of AI and Blockchain: All You Need to Know” Appinventiv, 2019 available at: https://appinventiv.com/blog/ai-in-blockchain/#:~:text=AI%20and%20Blockchain%20 (last visited July 5, 2024).

[2] ODR, “What is ODR?” www.ncsc.org, 2020available at: https://www.ncsc.org/odr/guidance-and-tools.

[3] NU Cepal, Digital Technologies for a New Future, 2022.

[4] Wayne F Cascio and Ramiro Montealegre, “How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations” ResearchGate, 2016available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299400943_How_Technology_Is_Changing_Work_and_Organizations.

[5] “The Role of Lawyers in the Face of Increasingly Capable Technology | Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC),” www.acc.comavailable at: https://www.acc.com/role-lawyers-face-increasingly-capable-technology.

[6] Sachin Kumar, Prayag Tiwari and Mikhail Zymbler, “Internet of Things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: a review,” 6 Journal of Big Data (2019).

[7] Deeksha Somani , “Protecting Your Privacy: Safeguarding Your Webcam from Hacking Threats” The Times of India, 1 February 2024.

[8] Office of the Victorian Information Commissioner, “Internet of Things and Privacy - Issues and Challenges” Office of the Victorian Information Commissioner, 2021available at: https://ovic.vic.gov.au/privacy/resources-for-organisations/internet-of-things-and-privacy-issues-and-challenges/.

[10] Adam Bohr and Kaveh Memarzadeh, “The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications,” 1 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare 25–60 (2020).

[11] Liability for Artificial Intelligence Report from the Expert Group on Liability and New Technologies -New Technologies Formation.

[12] On Artificial Intelligence -A European Approach to Excellence and Trust White Paper on Artificial Intelligence a European Approach to Excellence and Trust, 19 February 2020.

[13] Philipp Hacker, “The European AI Liability Directives – Critique of a Half-Hearted Approach and Lessons for the Future” SSRN Electronic Journal (2022).

[14] The Economic Times, “AI and Privacy: The privacy concerns surrounding AI, its potential impact on personal data” The Economic Times, 25 April 2023.

[15] Zibusiso Dewa, “The Relationship between Biometric Technology and Privacy: A Systematic Review,” 739 Sai Conference (2017).

[16] Kavous Salehzadeh Niksirat et al., “Wearable Activity Trackers: A Survey on Utility, Privacy, and Security” ACM Computing Surveys (2024).

[19] NCES, “Chapter 6 -- Information Security, from Safeguarding Your Technology, NCES Publication 98-297 (National Centre for Education Statistics)” nces.ed.gov, 2023available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/safetech/chapter6.asp.

[20] Foonkie Monkey, “The Role Of Big Data In FinTech” Code X, 2023 available at: https://medium.com/codex/the-role-of-big-data-in-fintech-b125342b9123.

[21] TokenEx, “What is 3-D Secure Authentication, and Why Do I Need It?” tokenex, 2020available at: https://www.tokenex.com/blog/what-is-3-d-secure-authentication-and-why-do-i-need-it/ (last visited July 5, 2024).

[22] “Scope for Reformative Dispute Resolution in India: Abolition of The Intellectual Property Appellate Board to Arbitration of Intellectual Property Disputes | Economic and Political Weekly,” www.epw.in, 2024available at: https://www.epw.in/engage/article/scope-reformative-dispute-resolution-india (last visited July 5, 2024).

[24] Lieven Hermans et al., “Decrypting financial stability risks in crypto-asset markets” www.ecb.europa.eu (2022).

[25] Rakesh Sharma, “Non-Fungible Token Definition: Understanding NFTs” Investopedia, 2023 available at: https://www.investopedia.com/non-fungible-tokens-nft-5115211.

[26] N Srikrishna, Report of the High Level Committee to Review the Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India, 30 July 2017.

[27] “2016 An insight into resolving Technology, Media and Telecoms Disputes - School of International Arbitration,” arbitration. qmul.ac .uk available at: https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2016/ (last visited July 5, 2024).

[29] David Mcllwaine, “Study launched into efficiency of international arbitration in resolving technology disputes” Pinsent Masons, 2024available at: https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/study-launched-into-efficiency-of-international-arbitration-in-resolving-technology-disputes (last visited July 5, 2024).

[30] World Intellectual Property Organization, “ADR Advantages” Wipo.int, 2019 available at: https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/advantages.html.

[31] “What Is International Arbitration? • Arbitration,” International Arbitration available at: https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/what-is-international-arbitration/.

[33] Sam (Ronghui) Li et al., “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in China Between 2012-2022: Review and Remarks (Part II)” Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2023 available at: https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2023/09/12/recognition-and-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral-awards-in-china-between-2012-2022-review-and-remarks-part-ii-2/.

[35] Gousia Habib et al., “Blockchain Technology: Benefits, Challenges, Applications, and Integration of Blockchain Technology with Cloud Computing,” 14 Future Internet (2022).

[36] Catherine Rogers, The Ethics of International Arbitrators the ETHICS of INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATORS.

[37] Robert W Wachter, Grace Yoon and Minjae Yoo, “Confidentiality in International IP Arbitration” globalarbitrationreview.com, 2022available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-ip-arbitration/second-edition/article/confidentiality-in-international-ip-arbitration.

[38] “Resolving IP Disputes through Mediation and Arbitration,” www.wipo.int, 2006 available at: https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2006/02/article_0008.html.

[39] Nicole Iannarone, A MODEL for POST-PANDEMIC REMOTE ARBITRATION?

[41] sylvie, “ICC Arbitration and ADR Commission Report on Emergency Arbitrator Proceedings” ICC - International Chamber of Commerce, 2019available at: https://iccwbo.org/news-publications/arbitration-adr-rules-and-tools/emergency-arbitrator-proceedings-icc-arbitration-and-adr-commission-report/ (last visited July 5, 2024).

[43] Bhumika Indulia, “A Requiem for Costs” SCC Times, 2023available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/02/06/a-requiem-for-costs/ (last visited July 5, 2024).

[44] WIPO, “WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization” Wipo.int, 2019available at: https://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html.

[46] “WIPO Schedule of Fees and Costs,” www.wipo.intavailable at: https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/fees/#:~:text=A%2025%25%20reduction%20on%20the (last visited July 5, 2024).

[48] Sanjeev K Kapoor and Saman Ahsan , “Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards: India - Global Arbitration Review” globalarbitrationreview.com, 2024available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/insight/know-how/challenging-and-enforcing-arbitration-awards/report/india.

[49] Stefan Calimanu, “How technology is changing the landscape of economic development” ResearchFDI, 2023available at: https://researchfdi.com/resources/articles/how-technology-is-changing-the-landscape-of-economic-development/.

[1] Tukaram S. Dighole v. Manikrao Shivaji Kokate, (2010) 4 SCC 329

[2] Hardam Singh v. State of Punjab, 2019 SCC OnLine P&H 6373

[3] Janice Castelino, Drones and Future Feasibility of Drones in India, 4 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 1062 (2021).

[6] Stephenson, P., & Gilbert, K. (2013). Investigating Computer-Related Crime (2nd ed.). Routledge.

[7] G.M. Jones & S.G. Winster, ‘Forensics Analysis on Smart Phones Using Mobile Forensics Tools.,’ International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research 8(13) , 1859-1869 (2017)

[8] J. Kävrestad, ‘Fundamentals of Digital Forensics Theory Methods and Real Life Applications’, Springer International Publishing AG (2018).

[9] Da-Yu Kao et al., Drone Forensic Investigation: DJI Spark Drone as A Case Study, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 159,1890-1899 (2019)

[10] You, Il Sun, et al., ‘Method for verifying drone included in industrial internet of things system, by using petri-net modeling’ U.S. Patent No. 11,914,720. (2024), US11914720B2 - Method for verifying drone included in industrial internet of things system, by using petri-net modeling - Google Patents

[11] Andrew M. Lemieux, Geotagged Photos: A Useful Tool for Criminological Research? 4 CRIME SCI. 1 (2015).

[12] Adam Smith, Drones as Techno-Legal Assemblages, 4 LAW, TECH. & HUM. 152 (2022).

[13] Claude Roux, et al., ‘The End of the (Forensic Science) World as We Know It? The Example of Trace Evidence, Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, vol. 370(1674), 2 (2015), JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24505153

[14] Jutta Weber, ‘Keep Adding. On Kill Lists, Drone Warfare, and the Politics of Databases,’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34, 1 107-125 (2016)

[15] Lisa Portmess & Bassam Romaya, ‘Digital Peacekeepers, Drone Surveillance and Information Fusion: A Philosophical Analysis of New Peacekeeping,’ Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, vol. 62(145), 15-16 (2015), http://www.jstor.org/stable/24719928.

[16] Timothy M. Ravich, Courts in the Drone Age, 42 N. KY. L. REV. 164 (2015).

[17] P. R. Stephenson, Digital Forensic Science: An Oxymoron, 6 LEGAL ISSUES J. 95 (2018).

[18] H. Bouafif et. al., ‘Drone forensics: Challenges and new insights,’ In Proceedings of the 2018 9^th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), Paris, France, 26–28 February 2018; IEEE:Piscataway, NJ, USA. 1–6. (2018)

[19] Jennifer Mnookin, Excerpt from Transcript of Proceedings: Experts and Forensic Evidence, 37 SW. U. L. REV. 1009 (2008); Brandon L. Garrett & Peter J. Neufeld, “Invalid forensic science testimony and wrongful convictions” Virginia Law Review 1-97, (2009)

[20] Graeme Horsman, Unmanned aerial vehicles: A preliminary analysis of forensic challenges, Digital Investigation, Vol. 16, 1-11 (2016)

[21] Cyber Forensics and Admissibility of Digital Evidence, (2012) PL January S-23

[22] Ram Singh v. Col. Ram Singh, AIR 1986 SC 3

[23] A.Y. Javaid et. al., ‘Cyber security threat analysis and modelling of an unmanned aerial vehicle system,’ In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), Waltham, MA, USA, 13–15 585–590 (2012).

[24] Timothy M. Ravich, Courts in the Drone Age, 42 N. KY. L. REV. 161 (2015).

[25] K. Iqbal et. al., ‘Drone forensics: A case study of digitalforensic investigations conducted on common drone models’, Int. J. Digit. Crime Forensics (IJDCF) 13, 1–25 (2021)
(PDF) Drone Forensics: An Innovative Approach to the Forensic Investigation of Drone Accidents Based on Digital Twin Technology. Available from:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377553617_Drone_Forensics_An_Innovative_Approach_to_the_Forensic_Investigation_of_Drone_Accidents_Based_on_Digital_Twin_Technology.

[26] Guille v. Swan, 19 Johns. 381 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1822).

[30] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 43 F 3d 1311 (9th Cir 1995)

[31] Matyszozyk, C. (2016, October 26). Judge rules man had right to shoot down drone over his house. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from CNET: 2017. https://www.cnet.com/news/judge-rules-man-had-right-to-shootdown-drone-over-his-house4

[32] Al-Room Khalifa et. al, ‘Drone Forensics : A Case Study of Digital Forensic Investigations Conducted on Common Drone Models’, International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics, 13(1), (2021).

[33] The Regulatory Framework for Aerial Imaging by Recreational Users of “Drones” in Singapore, (2017) 29 SAcLJ 126

[34] Evangelos Mantas & Constantinos Patsakis, ‘Who watches the new watchmen? The challenges for drone digital forensics investigations,’ Array, Vol. 14 (2022), 100135, ISSN 2590-0056,

BALANCING TRADITION AND ANIMAL WELFARE: A CRITICAL ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD OF INDIA V. NAGARAJA & ORS (2014) 7 SCC 547 BY: AMANDA JESSICA FERNANDES & GAURAV SHAKTINATH MISHRA

THE IMPACT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LEGALIZATION: EXAMINING THE BROADER ISSUE OF LGBTQ+ RIGHTS AND EQUALITY BY - KHUSHI DIXIT

A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTORAL POLITICS IN INDIA BY- SAKSHI, TUSHAR SHARMA, SANJANA PRAJAPATI & ASHUTOSH NAYAK

SEX OR RAPE? THE DIFFERENCE IS CONSENT BY - JAI RANI.S.M & JAYASRI JAGANATHAN

DIGITAL ETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY - SUNANDA DAS

MISUSE OF WOMEN CENTRIC LAWS IN INDIA BY - AANCHAL GUPTA

GLOBAL METAMORPHOSIS IN THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS PANOPTIC IMPLICATION IN REALM OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - ADEEB BAKHTAVAR & ARSHIKA SHEORAN

AI IN TAXATION: REDEFINING ADMINISTRATION AND COMPLIANCE BY - NIYATI SRIVASTAVA

THE IMPACT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES ON ARBITRATION BY: - SATYA VRAT PANDEY

“Revolutionizing Crime Scene Investigations”: Drone Forensics by - Vanshita Srivastava

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation