INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1] Choudhary, S. (2015). Surrogacy: Policy & Legal Framework in India. SSRN Electronic Journal.doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2612347.

[2] Timms, O. (2018). Ending commercial surrogacy in India: significance of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016. Indian Journal Of Medical Ethics. doi: 10.20529/ijme.2018.019.

[3] Bhaumik, S. (2012).The Legal Standpoint of Surrogacy in India. SSRN Electronic Journal.doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2036499.

[4] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597

[5] Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration, CIVIL APPEAL NO.5845 OF 2009

[6] K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, AIR 2017 SC 4161

[7] Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 4321

[8] Baby Manji Yamada v. Union of India, WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 369 OF 2008.

[9] Baby Manji Yamada v. Union of India, WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 369 OF 2008.

[10] Baby Manji Yamada v. Union of India, WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 369 OF 2008

[11] Jan Balaz v. Union of India, CA No. 8714/2010

[12] Joan Becker v. State and Others, CIVIL APPEAL No.1053 of 2013

[13] D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, WITH WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 592 OF 1987

[14] Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011

a) [1]directly or indirectly determines purchase or sale prices;

b) limits or controls production, supply, markets, technical development, investment or provision of services;

c) shares the market or source of production or provision of services by way of allocation of geographical area of market, or type of goods or services, or number of customers in the market or any other similar way;

d) directly or indirectly results in bid rigging or collusive bidding, shall be presumed to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition:

[2] “agreement” includes any arrangement or understanding or action in concert,

(i) whether or not, such arrangement, understanding or action is formal or in writing; or

(ii) whether or not such arrangement, understanding or action is intended to be enforceable by legal proceedings;

a) [3] creation of barriers to new entrants in the market;

b) driving existing competitors out of the market;

c) foreclosure of competition by hindering entry into the market;

d) accrual of benefits to consumers;

e) improvements in production or distribution of goods or provision of services;

f) promotion of technical, scientific and economic development by means of production or distribution of goods or provision of services.

[4] FICCI Multiplex Association of India v United Producers/Distributors Forum and Ors , 25^th May, 2011

[5] Orders by Commission after inquiry into agreements or abuse of dominant position., Where after inquiry the Commission finds that any agreement referred to in section 3 or action of an enterprise in a dominant position, is in contravention of section 3 or section 4, as the case may be, it may pass all or any of the following orders, namely-

(a) direct to discontinue and not to re-enter such agreement or discontinue such abuse of dominant position, as the case may be;

(b) impose such penalty, as it may deem fit

(d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be specified in the order

(e) direct the enterprises to abide by such other orders as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions

(f) recommend to the Central Government for the division of an enterprise enjoying dominant position;

(g) pass such other order as it may deem fit.

[1] Available at http://streetlaw.org/en/case/1%22 (last visited on 30 December, 2021).

[2] Prashant Gupta, “Doctrine of Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis Between India, U.K. and U.S.A” IJLDAI 49

[9] M.Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited, New Delhi, 2010)

[10] H.C.L. Meillat, University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 15, 1963-64, pp. 489-492, quoted by P. Ravi Jashuva

[11] Justice CK Thakkar and Justice Arijit Pasayat, Dr. CD Jha Judicial Review of Legislative Acts 116 (2nd, Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wadhwa, Nagpur 2009)

[12] Ram Jawaya Kapoor v. State of Punjab, AIR 1955 SC 549 at 556.

[13] Encyclopedia of the American Constitution 1054 (1986), quoted by V. Nageswara Rao and G.B.Reddy, Doctrine of Judicial Review and Tribunals: Speed Breakers Ahead, ”(1997) 39 JILI. 415.

[16] P. Sambhamurthy v. State of A.P. AIR 1987 SC 663; Kihota v. Zachillu (1992) Supp. (2) SCC 651; L. Chandra Kumar v. U.O.I. AIR 1997 SC 1125.

[17] D.D. Basu, Commentary on the constitution of India, 5th Ed., Vol. 1, p. 170.

[21] Hon’ble Mr. K.G. Balakrishnan, Judicial Activism under the Indian Constitution available at http://www.sci.nic.in/speeches/speeches_2009/judicial_activism_tcd_dublin_14-10-09.pdf , Visited on 31.11.2021

[22] Evolution & Growth Of Judicial Activism In India’, Shodhganga at 79, available at http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/32340/8/09_chapter%203.pdf (Last accessed on 10.12.2021).

[26] Flathman Richard (1994). ‘Liberalism and the suspect Enterprise of political Institutionalism: the case of the Rule of Law’, The Rule of Law: Nomos XXXVI, New York: New York University Press

[27] Church of Scientology v Woodward, (1983) 57 ALJR 42

[31] Seervai H M (1993). Constitutional Law of India, Bombay: Tripathi Publishers.

[32] Khanna H R (1987). Neither Roses nor Thorns, Lucknow: Eastern Book Company

[1] Dr.Yogender, Juvenile Delinquency system in india: an Appraisal, Academic views & reviews, vol.no.6 (No. ii & iii) July – December, 2016

[3] Section 13 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015

[4] Section 14 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015

[5] Article 1 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Child, 1989.

[6] Section 7(2) 0f the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015

[7] Galting, F.P., Aggression among delinquents and non-delinquency: A review. Britisli Journal of Criminology, 12 (2), 1972.

[8] Sec A.M. vs Jeery Ruttier, 360 F.3d 787 (7th Cir. 2004)

[9] For a discussion of social tension during this era, see. Fink.L. (Edn.) 2001. Major Problems in the Gilded Age and the Progressive Era: Documents and essays (2nd Ed.) Boston: Houthon Miffin.

[10] Kaldate, S.V., Juvenile delinquency in developing countries, Indian Journal of Criminology, 6 (2), 1978, 100.

[11] International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies (IJIMS), 2014, Vol 1, No.6, 64- 70.

[13] [Criminal Appeal No. 1403 of 2012 Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 7271 of 2011]

[27] First Published 2004. Ved Kumari, The Juvenile Justice System in India from Welfare to Rights, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

[28] Yogesh Snehi, ?State and Child Justice: Stories of Delinquent Juveniles in Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 39, No. 41, 9 October 2004, pp. 4512?4515

[29] (3rd ed., 2012) R. N. Choudhary, Law relating to Juvenile Justice in India

[30] The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Amendment Bill, 2021. (n.d.). PRS LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH. Retrieved December 4, 2022, from https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-juvenile-justice-care-and- protection-of-children-amendment-bill-2021

[31] Prof. Najmi, Mohd. Juvenile Delinquency ? Its Causes and Remedies, 25 CBI Bulletin, 1991.

[1] “Global Women’s issues: Women in the world today, extended version chapter 11 :women and environment”, available on https://opentextbc.ca/womenintheworld/chapter/11

[2] Shiva,Vandana and Maria Mies, “Ecofeminism.London”, 2014, Zed Books

[3] “Women and life on Earth: what is ecofeminism”, available on www.Wloe.org/what-is-ecofeminism.76.0.html

SURROGACY ACT: A VIOLATION OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS BY - ANJALI NAIN & DHAKA VIRENDAR KUMAR

INVESTIGATION BY POLICE: SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON RE-INVESTIGATION AND FURTHER INVESTIGATION BY - RIYA TRIVEDI & AAROHI SANKLAN

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA BY - SHRUTI SINGH

COMPETITION LAW AND ECONOMIC THEORY BY - SHUBHANGI SHARMA

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND JUDICIAL INTERVENTION IN INDIA IN TERMS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW- A CRITICAL ANALYSIS BY – ANANYA KUMARI MEHTA

JUVENILE JIUTICE IN INDIA: JUDICIAL TRENDS BY – ABHISHEK BENJWAL

SMALL SHAREHOLDERS DIRECTOR UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 BY - ANISH RAJ SINGH, AYUSH KRISHN DIXIT & HIMANSHI SINGH

BAN ON COMMERCIAL SURROGACY IN INDIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW BY: ADHITI SHARMA

CAN CURRENT NATURE OF DEVELOPMENT SUSTAIN WOMEN EMPOWERMENT BY - SNEHA SOLANKI

UNCOVERING THE DECEPTIVE TACTICS OF CRYPTOCURRENCY SCAMMERS: A DEEP DIVE INTO THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF SCAMS TARGETING INVESTORS BY - MR. ANSH PARIKH

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation