All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1]https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/types-of-advertising

[2] https://medium.com/@BrandBerryMarcom/how-advertising-imapcts-consumer-purchase-decision-making-62415d283d53

[5] https://blog.forumias.com/regulation-of-advertisements-in-india/

[1] Burhan, “Indian Law of Indemnity and English Law of Indemnity: An Analysis” (Legal Service India - Law, Lawyers and Legal Resources)

[2] ADAMSON V. JARVIS (1827) 4 BING.66:29 R.R 503

[4] Wayne Courtney, 'Indemnities and the Indian Contract Act 1872' (2015) 27 Nat'l L Sch

India Rev 66

[6] Criswell v. Seaman Body Corp., 233 Wis. 606 (1940)

[7] - DR and others, “Contract of Indemnity and Loopholes” (iPleadersAugust 16, 2021)

[8] Wayne Courtney, Indemnities and the Indian Contract Act 1872, 27 NAT'l L. Sch. INDIA REV. 66 (2015).

[10] Top A and Tiwari S, "Contract of Indemnity Case Laws - IJSER” (International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER)

[11] “Burnished –Burnished ISSN-2582-5534 ISSN-2582-5534” (BURNISHED LAW JOURNAL – ISSN-2582-5534August 11, 2022

[12] Wayne Courtney, Indemnities and the Indian Contract Act 1872, 27 NAT'l L. Sch. INDIA REV. 66 (2015).

[19] “Law of Contract- When Is the Contract of Indemnity Enforceable” (Legal Service India - Law, Lawyers and Legal Resources)

[22] LawBhoomi, “Contract of Indemnity: Meaning, Concept and Nature” (LawBhoomiAugust 19, 2021)

[2] Sherrilyn A. Ifill, “Creating a Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Lynching” published in the Minnesota Journal of law and Inequality Volume 21 Issue 2, December 2003 Pg 291.

[4] McCaslin, Richard B. Tainted Breeze: The Great Hanging at Gainesville, Texas 1862, Louisiana State University Press, 1994, p. 81

[5] Williams, Phillip "Mary Turner and the Lynching Rampage of 1918 Reexamined" Wiregrass Region Digital History Project, (18 May 2018), https://sites.google.com/view/wiregrassrdhp/mary-turner accessed on dated January 15, 2023 at 11: 20PM

[6] White, Walter F "Burning of Jim Mclherron: An N.A.A.C.P. Investigation". The Crisis: A Record of the Darker Races Penguin. pp. 127–128. ISBN 978-0-593-18300-7.

[7]James M (2007) "The "Waco Horror": The Lynching of Jesse Washington". In Bruce A. Glasrud; James Smallwood (eds.). The African American Experience in Texas: An Anthology. Texas Tech University Press. ISBN 978-0-89672-609-3.

[8] Wright Thompson, “His Name was Emmett Till” The Atlantic, September 2021 https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/09/barn-emmett-till-murder/619493/ accessed on dated January 17, 2022 at 11:52 PM

[9] King, Joyce. Hate Crime: “The Story of a Dragging in Jasper, Texas” Random House, Inc., 2002 ISBN 0-375-42132-7 .

[11] Evan Hills, Drew Jordan, “ How George Floyd was Killed in the Police Custody”, New York Times published on 31^st May 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/george-floyd-investigation.html accessed on dated 23rd January 2023 at 10:50 PM.

[12] National Human Rights Commission of India, “Killing of Five Dalits at Jhajjar Haryana”, 19^th November 2003 https://nhrc.nic.in/press-release/killing-five-dalits-jhajjar-haryana-0 accessed on dated 6th January 2023 at 12:30PM

[13] S. Viswanathan, “Khairlanji: The crime and punishment”, The Hindu, 10^th November 2016 https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/Readers-Editor/Khairlanji-the-crime-and-punishment/article16149798.ece accessed on dated 7th January 2023 at 12:30PM

[14] PTI, “Jai Shri Ram: The Hindu Chant that became a murder cry” BBC Hindi (10^th July 2019) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48882053 accessed on dated 25th January 2023 at 01:00 PM).

[16] Zeeshan Sheikh, “Palghar Lynching: A Recap of What Happened” The Indian Express April 24, 2020 https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/palghar-mob-lynching-mahant-kalpavruksha-giri-6370528/ accessed on dated 29^th January 2023 at 09:00 AM.

[2] Shakti Vahini v. Union of India, (2018) 7 SCC 192.

[3]Naz Foundation v. Govt. (NCT of Delhi), 2009 SCC Online Del 1762,94:

[4] Dipak Misra C.J., Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1,144.

[5] MARTHA NUSSBAUM, POLITICAL EMOTIONS: WHY LOVE MATTERS FOR JUSTICE 382 (2013).

[6] Indu Malhotra J., Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1,20.

[7] See generally DAVID A.J. RICHARDS, WHY LOVE LEADS TO JUSTICE: LOVE ACROSS THE BOUNDARIES (2015).

[8] See generally BELL HOOKS, THE WILL TO CHANGE: MEN, MASCULINITY AND LOVE (2004).

[9] Arunkumar v. The Inspector General of Registration, 2019 SCC OnLine Mad 8779.

[10] PLATO, THE SYMPOSIUM (translated by Alexander Nehamas & Paul Woodruff, 1989).

[13] Shafin Jahan v. Asokan, (2018) 16 SCC 368,19.

[14] International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), Yogyakarta Principles - Principles on the application of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity, Introduction to the Yogakarta Principles (March 2007).

[15] Chandrachud J., Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶ 67.

[18] Arunkumar v. The Inspector General of Registration, 2019 SCC OnLine Mad 8779, ¶ 16.

[19] Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1.

[21] Shakti Vahini v. Union of India, (2018) 7 SCC 192.

[1] (“Prostitution | Definition, History, and Facts”)

[2] Girja Bai v Sadashiv Dhundiraj AIR 1916 PC 104 (Privy Council).

[3] Kamepalli Avilam v. Mannem Venkataswamy, 1917 (13) MLJ 746

[4] Syed Kasam v. Jorawar Singh [(1922) ILR 50 Cal 84 (PC)]

[5] Adiyalath Katheesumma v. Adiyalath Beechu [ILR 1930 Mad 502] ...

1] Article 12(3) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and USA.

[2] Section 9(1)(vi)(b) Explanation 4, The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[3] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[13] The Copyright Act, 1957, No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 1957 (India).

[14] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[16] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[17] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[18] Transmission Corpn. of A.P. Ltd. v. CIT, (1999) 7 SCC 266.

[19] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[21] The Copyright Act, 1957, No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 1957 (India).

[22] The Copyright Act, 1957, No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 1957 (India).

[26] PILCOM v. Commissioner of Income Tax, (2020) SCC OnLine SC 426.

[27] Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, (2020) 7 SCC.

[1] Takeovers in India – An overview, by Vijay Sambamurthi & Siddharth Shah

[2] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[4] Takeovers in India – An overview, by Vijay Sambamurthi & Siddharth Shah

[5] Takeovers in India – An overview, by Vijay Sambamurthi & Siddharth Shah

[6] Kenton, Will. “Vertical Merger.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 22 July 2022, www.investopedia.com/terms/v/verticalmerger.asp.

[7] Kenton, Will. “Conglomerate Merger.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 19 May 2021, www.investopedia.com/terms/c/conlgomeratemerger.asp.

[8] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[9] Takeovers in India – An overview, by Vijay Sambamurthi & Siddharth Shah

[10] Report of The Committee On Unemployment, May 1973, Govt. Of India Min.Of Labour & Rehabilitation (Deptt. Of Labour & Employment)

[12] SEBI. “Report of the Takeover Regulations Advisory Committee.” SEBI, n.d.

[13] Corporate Governance Structure, Mergers and Takeovers in India in the Post Liberalization Regime-Proposals and Policies, by Nandita Das Gupta

[14] SEBI. “Discussion Paper on ‘Brightline Tests for Acquisition of ‘Control ...” Accessed November 2, 2022. Https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/attachdocs/1457945258522.pdf.

[17] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[18] Corporate Governance Structure, Mergers and Takeovers in India in the Post Liberalization Regime-Proposals and Policies, by Nandita Das Gupta

[19] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[22] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[1] Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu And Others 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651

[2] Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu And Others 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651

[4] Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu And Others 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651

[7] Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu And Others 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651

[8] Gupta, Ruchi. “Ruchi Gupta Writes: The Crisis In Maharashtra Shows The Anti-Defection Law To Be Ineffective, Even Counterproductive.” The Indian Express, June 27, 2022. Https://Indianexpress.Com/Article/Opinion/Columns/Maharashtra-Political-Crisis-Anti-Defection-Law-Ineffective-7992778/.

[1] Stephen R. Arnott, Family Law: Autonomy, Standing, and Children’s Rights, 33 William Mitchell Law Review 809 (2007). Arnott notes that “the very term ‘children’s rights’ is both broad and loose,” id. at 808

[2] The U.N. Declaration of the Rights of the Child comprises a Preamble and ten principles; G.A. Res. 1386 (XIV) 14 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 19, U.N. Doc. A/4354

[3] Geraldine Van Bueren, The International Law on the Rights of the Child 10-11 (Dordrecht/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995)

[4] The 1924 Declaration stated children “must be the first to receive relief”; the DRC specifies more pragmatically that they are to be “among the first” to receive protection and relief (principle 8).

[5] The Convention on the Rights of the Child, with a Preamble and 54 articles, was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly on November 20, 1989, and entered into force on September 2, 1990. G.A. Res. 44/25, annex, 44 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 167, U.N. Doc. A/44/49 (1989); 28 I.L.M. 1448 (1989)

[6] Jean Koh Peters, How Children Are Heard in Child Protective Proceedings, in the United States and Around the World in 2005: Survey Findings, Initial Observations, and Areas for Further Study [Special Issue on Legal Representation of Children], 6 Nevada Law Journal 971 (Spring 2006)

[7] Article 1

[8] Articles 7 and 8

[9] Articles 20 and 22

[10] Articles 8 and 30

[11] Article 13

[12] Article 40

[13] Article 12

[14] Articles 21 and 23

[15] Articles 28(3) and 39

[16] Ursula Kilkelly, The Best of Both Worlds for Children’s Rights? Interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights in the Light of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Human Rights Quarterly 311 (2001)

[17] The Sex Trafficking Protocol comprises a preamble and 17 articles. G.A. Res. A/RES/54/263 of 25 May 2000. It entered into force on January 18, 2002

[18] Article 9(4)

[19] Article 12

[20] The Child Soldiers Protocol, comprising a Preamble and 13 articles, entered into force on February 12, 2002. G.A. Res. A/RES/54/263 of 25 May 2000.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Articles 1 and 2

[23] Article 4

[24] Article 3(1-3)

[25] Article 6(1) and (3)

[26] Organization of African Unity (OAU), Declaration on the Rights and Welfare of the African Child, AHG/St. 4 (XVI) Rev. 1 1979, Declaration and Resolutions Adopted by the Sixteenth Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government (July 17-20, 1979)

[27] Article 2

[28] Articles 3-5

[29] Articles 6-12

[30] Articles 13-14

[31] Article 15

[32] Article 16

[33] Article 21

[34]Article 27

[35] Article 28

[36] Article 29

[37] Article 13(1)

[38] Article 13(2a)

[39] Article 14(4)

[40] Article 10(3)

[41] Article 23(1)

[42] Article 18(4)

[43] Article 23(4)

[44] Article 1

[45] Article 5

[46] Article 6

[47] Article 5, paragraph 1

[48] Article 13

[49] Article 3

[50] Article 16

[51] Article 7

[52] Article 8(1)

[53] Article 9

[54] Article 10 (3) and (5)

[55] Article 15

[56] Article 20(1)

[57] Article 20(2)

[58] Article 1

[59] Article 12

[60] Article 2

[61] Article 12

[62] Article 3

[63] Article 7

[64] Article 11

[65] Article 13, paragraph 2

[66] Article 14

[67] Article 19

[68] Article 18

[69] Article 1

[70] Article 4(d)

[71] Article 30

[72] Article 31

[73] Article 1

[74] Article 3, paragraph 1

[75] Article 1(a)

[76] Article 1(d)

[77] Article 11

Influence Of Advertisement On Consumer Behaviour By- Aishwarya Pradeep Bhakta

Loopholes in Section 124 and Section 125 of the Indian Contracts Act By-Siya Sharma

MOB LYNCHING: THE VITRIOLIC SOCIAL EVIL By- Ms. Rashi Sood (Assistant Professor) & Mr. Pranav Kumar Kaushal

LOVE IN LEGAL REASONING: THE RIGHT TO LOVE AS AN ASPECT OF INDIVIDUAL AUTONOMY By- Ms. Shraddha Sataywan Choudhary

Legalization of Prostitution By- Siya Sharma

CASE COMMENTARY: ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR. (AIR 1964 SC 136; 1964 (2) S.C.R 933) By- Shruti Verma

CASE ANALYSIS: ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANOTHER By- Mrudhu Bashni Rajendran

The Takeover Code-A comparison with the Past By- Saahen Sharma

Case Commentary Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu And Others Supreme Court of India by- Saahen Sharma

UNDER DIFFERENT HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS By- Dr.Adv.V.V.Ratheeshkumar

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

[5] CA 1902

[6] Criswell v. Seaman Body Corp., 233 Wis. 606 (1940)

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation