DEFRAUDING SHAREHOLDERS LIMITATIONS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN INDIA (By-Muskan Kuchhal, Ranvita Rao Juvvadi, Rishika Pandey & Sivani Lakshmi Madugula)

Authors: Muskan Kuchhal, Ranvita Rao Juvvadi, Rishika Pandey & Sivani Lakshmi Madugula

Registration ID: 100922 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA922 ,IJLRA923, IJLRA924, IJLRA925
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link:https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-86558732/Muskan Kuchhal, Ranvita Rao Juvvadi, Rishika Pande
Page No : 383-399 | No of times Downloads: 0041

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6953978712530792448

Email Id: Muskan Kuchhal-18jgls-muskan.k@jgu.edu.in, Ranvita Rao Juvvadi-18jgls-ranvita.rj@jgu.edu.in, Rishika Pandey-18jgls-rishika.p@jgu.edu.in & Sivani Lakshmi Madugula-18jgls-sivani.lm@jgu.edu.in

Marital Rape — Myth, Reality and Need for Criminalization (By-Chaya Gaur & Mr. Shaharyar Khan)

Authors: Chaya Gaur & Mr. Shaharyar Khan

Registration ID: 100926 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA926, IJLRA927
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-35485964/Chaya Gaur
Page No : 369-383 | No of times Downloads: 0049

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6953979200634511360

Email Id: chayagaur62@gmail.com

Cyber Jurisprudence At Indian And International Level (By- Sonia Balhara)

Authors: Sonia Balhara

Registration ID: 100921 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA921
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-34736593/Sonia Balhara
Page No : 357-369 | No of times Downloads: 0044

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6953258013503737856

Email Id: balharasonia01@gmail.com

FUTURE OF FEDERALISM: ANALYSIS OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION (By-Ms. Khushbu Prasad)

Authors: Ms. Khushbu Prasad

Registration ID: 100920 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA920
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-55742574/Ms. Khushbu Prasad
Page No : 346-357 | No of times Downloads: 0068

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6953257733907255296

Email Id: prasadkhushbu09@gmail.com

SECONDARY TRAUMATIC STRESS, BURNOUTS AND LACK OF SAFETY - MAJOR HURDLES IN JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING (By-Avinash Gaikwad)

Authors: Avinash Gaikwad

Registration ID: 100919 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA919
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-33275864/Avinash Gaikwad
Page No : 323-346 | No of times Downloads: 0059

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6953257485000470528

Email Id: gaikwadavinash346@gmail.com

Need For Capital Punishment And Challenges (By: Navdeep Kaur & Amit Nagar)

Authors: Navdeep Kaur & Amit Nagar

Registration ID: 100917 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA917, IJLRA918
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-77455789/Navdeep Kaur & Amit Nagar
Page No : 309-323 | No of times Downloads: 0073

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6953257165591650306

Email Id: Navdeep Kaur-jandialnavdeep@gmail.com & Amit Nagar-amitnagarr@gmail.com

Analyzing Issues, Gaps And Flaws In Sections 124 And 125 Of The Indian Contract Act, 1872, And Providing Solutions (By- Akshat Anand)

Authors: Akshat Anand

Registration ID: 100916 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA916
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-26819314/ Akshat Anand
Page No : 295-309 | No of times Downloads: 0073

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6953256918601666560

Email Id: akshatanand0812@gmail.com

INDIAN ROAD CULTURE (By- Sanika Javdekar)

Authors: Sanika Javdekar

Registration ID: 100915 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA915
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-83514423/Sanika Javdekar
Page No : 288-295 | No of times Downloads: 0073

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6953256653366448128

Email Id: javdekarsanika007@gmail.com

A LEGAL STUDY ON AIR POLLUTION AND ITS FALL IN COVID-19 LOCKDOWN (By- M. Mano)

Authors: M. Mano

Registration ID: 100914 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA914
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-67355563/M. Mano
Page No : 277-288 | No of times Downloads: 0073

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6952904980756316160

Email Id: manomahendaran045@gmail.com

The Evolution And Revolution Of Copyright Law:An Indian Perspective (By-Anisha Arya)

Authors: Anisha Arya

Registration ID: 100913 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA913
Year : July-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2022-64858297/Anisha Arya
Page No : 262-277 | No of times Downloads: 0073

Paper Linkedin Url : https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6952878963278897152

Email Id: anishaarya08@gmail.com

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

^{^[1]}Aniket Singh, “CASE ANALYSIS: SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE LIMITED & ORS. V. SECURITIES EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS.” (December 2, 2016) accessed November 28, 2020.

^{^[2]} DLF Limited v SEBI [SAT Order in Appeal No. 331 of 2014].

^{^[3]} Paramvir Singh,“Sahara India Corporate Governance: Failure of Two Sahara Companies” (Academia.edu) accessed November 28, 2020.

^{^[4]} James McRitchie, “Corporate Governance In India” (Corporate Governance May 12, 2015) accessed November 28, 2020.

^{^[5]} Navita Mahajan, “Strategies That Led to Failure - Case Study of Corporate Governance” (2016) 16 Global Journal of Management and Business.

^{^[6]} Uma Shashikant, “Sahara: A Landmark Case That Brought Focus on Investor Protection” (The Economic Times) accessed November 28, 2020.

^{^[7]} Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd v SEBI, [2013] 1 SCC.

^{^[8]} Aditya Jaiswal, “How Shady Corporate Governance Has Given India Inc. a Bad Name” (Capitalmind, May 23, 2019) accessed November 28, 2020.

^{^[9]} Tamal Bandyopadhyay, “Regulators vs Sahara: the Untold Story” (Mint, September 30, 2012) accessed November 28, 2020.

^{^[10]} Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992.

^{^[12]} Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd v SEBI, [2013] 1 SCC.

^{^[14]} The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act 1956.

^{^[15]} Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992.

^{^[16]} Securities and Exchange Board Of India, Order 2011, WTM/KMA/CFD/392/06/2011. accessed 28 November 2020.

^{^[20]} Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992, s 11A-B.

^{^[24]} DLF Limited v SEBI [SAT Order in Appeal No. 331 of 2014].

^{^[25]} TC Prince, 'Indian Corporate Governance and The Need for An Overarching Focus Shift of Policies; A Review Based on Sahara Group Scam' [2014] 3(7) Global Journal for Research Analysis accessed 28 November 2020.

^{^[26]} Micheal K Bedner , 'The Role of the Media in Corporate Governance' (Oxford Research Encyclopedias -Business and Management, 2012) <https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-87> accessed 28 November 2020.

^{^[27]}Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd v SEBI, [2013] 1 SCC.

^{^[28]} Anurag K Agarwal, 'Corporate Governance: Confidentiality and Role of Media in Changing Times' (IIM Ahmedabad, 2012) accessed 28 November 2020.

^{^[29]} Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd v SEBI, [2013] 1 SCC.

^{^[30]} Shirish Mishra and Gurbir Singh, ‘Forensic Accounting: An Emerging Approach to Deal with Corporate Frauds in India’ (2017) 9(2) Global Journal of Enterprise Information System. pg 105 <221-View Point (VP)-443-1-10-20200314.pdf> accessed 27^th November 2020.

^{^[33]} Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd v SEBI, [2013] 1 SCC.

^{^[34]} Tamal Bandyopadhyay, ‘Regulators vs Sahara: The untold story’ (Live Mint, 1^st October 2012) accessed 28^th November 2020.

^{^[35]} Gyanendra Kumar Sahu and Madhu Sudan Dash, ‘Corporate Crimes: The Need for a Corporate Penal Code’ (2015) 9(2A) Journal of Arts, Humanities & Management. pg 7 < https://ddceutkal.ac.in/Journal/Search-Journal-July-15.pdf#page=7 > accessed 27^th November 2020.

^{^[36]} Narendrjeet Singh Sahni v Union of India, [2001] Supp (4) SCR 114.

^{^[37]} Gyanendra Kumar Sahu and Madhu Sudan Dash, ‘Corporate Crimes: The Need for a Corporate Penal Code’ (2015) 9(2A) Journal of Arts, Humanities & Management. pg 8 < https://ddceutkal.ac.in/Journal/Search-Journal-July-15.pdf#page=7 > accessed 27^th November 2020.

^{^[38]} Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd v SEBI, [2013] 1 SCC.

^{^[39]} Samanwaya Rautray, ‘Supreme Court directs Sahara chief Subrata Roy to appear before it on February 28’ (The Economic Times, 31st January 2019) accessed 28th November 2020.

[40] Alexander Dyck and Luigi Zingales, 'The Corporate Governance Role of the Media' accessed 28 November 2020

^{^[42]} Bajrang Lal, “A ‘CASE STUDIES’ ON Corporate Fraud in India – Sahara and Saradha” accessed November 28, 2020.

[1] Fundamental Duties, Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 11 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977)

[2] Proclamation of Emergency, Art. 352 of Constitution of India

[3] Effect of Proclamation of Emergency, Art. 353 of Constitution of India

[7] State of West Bengal v. Union of India, 1963 AIR 1241.

[8] State of Rajasthan v. Union of India, 1977 AIR 1361

[9] State of Karnataka v. Union of India, 1978 AIR 68.

[10] Kesvananda Bharti v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[11] S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, 1994 AIR 1918, 1994 SCC (3).

[1] https://blog.ipleaders.in/capital-punishment-in-india/

[2] http://www.britannica.com/topic/capital-punishment

[3] Capital Punishment in India by Dr. Subhash C. Gupta, 2000, p. 1.

[4] Op.cit. Capital Punishment in India by Dr. Subhash C. Gupta, 2000, p. 1.

[6] https://blog.ipleaders.in/capital-punishment-in-india/

[11] India. Law Commission of India, Report no.262 on Death Penalty, August 2015, pp.217-218.

[4] The Indian Contract Act, Section 125, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

[6] The Indian Contract Act 1872, Section 145, Acts of Parliament (India).

[10]Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar v. Moreshwar Madan Mantri (1942) 44 BOMLR 703

[11] Sambhav Purohit and Aayushi Bhatti, Contract of indemnity and loopholes, Ipleaders, (Apr. 14, 2022, 6:00 PM), https://blog.ipleaders.in/contract-of-indemnity-and-loopholes/

[13] Law Commission of India, Thirteenth Report, 1872

[16] Wayne Courtney, Indemnities And The Indian Contract Act 1872, Vol.27, NLSIR, 2, (2015) http://www.jstor.org/stable/44283647 Satish Padhi, Ruchir Sinha & Vyapak Desai

[1] 13. Works in which copyright subsists —

(1) Subject to the provisions of this section and the other provisions of this Act, copyright shall subsist throughout India in the following classes of works, that is to say,—

(a) original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works;

(b) cinematograph films; and

[4] Khushi Agrawal, R.G Anand Vs M/S. Delux Films & Ors, 1978 Air 1613: Applicability In The Present Time, 2 IJLLR, (2021).

win-for-hindi-medium-as-bengali-film-ramdhanu-withdraws-plagiarism-charge.

[9] 13. Works in which copyright subsists —

(3) Copyright shall not subsist—

(a) in any cinematograph film if a substantial part of the film is an infringement of the copyright in any other work;

(b) in any 1[sound recording] made in respect of a literary, dramatic or musical work, if in making the 1[sound recording], copyright in such work has been infringed. 1[sound recording] made in respect of a literary, dramatic or musical work, if in making the 1[sound recording], copyright in such work has been infringed.

[10] Yash Raj Films Pvt Ltd v. Sri Sai Ganesh Productions, CS(COMM) 1329/2016.

[11] Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. Leo Burnett (India) Pvt., 2003 (2) BomCR 655; Zee Entertainment Enterprises v. Gajendra Singh & Ors., 2007 (6) BomCR 700.

[12] Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Eastern Indian Motion Pictures Association, AIR 1977 SC 1443.

[13] Aparthiba Debray, Physical Copy Doctrine versus the “Substantiality” Dictum, KHURANA & KHURANA, (Feb 12, 2020, 3:40 PM), https://www.khuranaandkhurana.com/2020/02/12/physical-copy-doctrine-versus-the-substantiality-dictum/#_ftn8.

[14] 51(a) (ii) permits for profit any place to be used for the communication of the work to the public where such communication constitutes an infringement of the copyright in the work, unless he was not aware and had no reasonable ground for believing that such communication to the public would be an infringement of copyright; or] 1[(ii) permits for profit any place to be used for the communication of the work to the public where such communication constitutes an infringement of the copyright in the work, unless he was not aware and had no reasonable ground for believing that such communication to the public would be an infringement of copyright; or].

[15] My Space Inc. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd., (2017) 236 DLT 478 (DB).

[24] Ned Snow, The Forgotten Right of Fair Use, 62 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 135 (2011).

[26] 39. Acts not infringing broadcast reproduction right or performer’s right —No broadcast reproduction right or performer’s right shall be deemed to be infringed by—

(a) the making of any sound recording or visual recording for the private use of the person making such recording, or solely for purposes of bona fide teaching or research; or

(b) the use, consistent with fair dealing, of excerpts of a performance or of a broadcast in the reporting of current events or for bona fide review, teaching or research; or

(c) such other acts, with any necessary adaptations and modifications, which do not constitute infringement of copyright under section 52.

[28] 40. Power to extend copyright to foreign works —The Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, direct that all or any provisions of this Act shall apply—

(a) to work first published in any territory outside India to which the order relates in like manner as if they were first published within India;

(b) to unpublished works, or any class thereof, the authors whereof were at the time of the making of the work, subjects or citizens of a foreign country to which the order relates, in like manner as if the authors were citizens of India;

(c) in respect of domicile in any territory outside India to which the order relates in like manner as if such domicile were in India;

(d) to any work of which the author was at the date of the first publication thereof, or, in a case where the author was dead at that date, was at the time of his death, a subject or citizen of a foreign country to which the order relates in like manner as if the author was a citizen of India at that date or time.

[30] Suryansh Broadcasting Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd & Anr., 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 179.

DEFRAUDING SHAREHOLDERS LIMITATIONS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN INDIA (By-Muskan Kuchhal, Ranvita Rao Juvvadi, Rishika Pandey & Sivani Lakshmi Madugula)

Marital Rape — Myth, Reality and Need for Criminalization (By-Chaya Gaur & Mr. Shaharyar Khan)

Cyber Jurisprudence At Indian And International Level (By- Sonia Balhara)

FUTURE OF FEDERALISM: ANALYSIS OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION (By-Ms. Khushbu Prasad)

SECONDARY TRAUMATIC STRESS, BURNOUTS AND LACK OF SAFETY - MAJOR HURDLES IN JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING (By-Avinash Gaikwad)

Need For Capital Punishment And Challenges (By: Navdeep Kaur & Amit Nagar)

Analyzing Issues, Gaps And Flaws In Sections 124 And 125 Of The Indian Contract Act, 1872, And Providing Solutions (By- Akshat Anand)

INDIAN ROAD CULTURE (By- Sanika Javdekar)

A LEGAL STUDY ON AIR POLLUTION AND ITS FALL IN COVID-19 LOCKDOWN (By- M. Mano)

The Evolution And Revolution Of Copyright Law:An Indian Perspective (By-Anisha Arya)

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[7] Win for ‘Hindi Medium’ as Bengali film ‘Ramdhanu’ withdraws plagiarism charge, SCROLL (June 15, 2022, 7:18 PM), https://scroll.in/reel/844880/win-for-hindi-medium-as-bengali-film-ramdhanu-withdraws-plagiarism-charge.