INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[3] Greg Allen, Chief of Strategy and Communications, Understanding AI Technology, JAIC Director Lt Gen Jack Shanahan, April 2020.

[6] Igor Shnurenko, Tatiana Murovana, Ibrahim Kushchu, 2020.

[8] Top 10 American AI Companies, India Berry, Nov 15, 2021.

[10] Artificial Intelligence Startups.org, Russia.

[11] Artificial Intelligence Startups.org, Japan, 2021.

[12] Inventive, 10 best AI Companies of India 2022.

[13] Opinio Juris, AI & Machine learning in Armed Conflict, 2020.

[14] National Centre for School Leadership, 2022.

[15] Baker Mckenzie, New Draft Rules on the use of Artificial Intelligence, May 2021.

[16] Scott Neuman, NPR, UN warns that AI can pose a threat to Human Right, Sept 16, 2021.

[17] IRRC No. 913, Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning in Armed Conflict, March 2021.

[18] International committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).

[1] Sexual and Reproductive health and rights of women, United Nations Human Rights, https://bit.ly/3k9FVYp.

[2] Tanvi Mathur, Reproductive right of women in India, Legal Service India, https://bit.ly/2YOuTiV.

[3] Srivastava and Another v Chandigarh Administration, CIVIL APPEAL NO.5845 OF 2009.

[5] Prateek Goyal, Slaughter house for wombs, Newslaundry, https://bit.ly/3z6IQVR.

[7] Sher Verick, Women’s labour force participation in India: Why is it so low, International Labour Organization, https://bit.ly/3A9oXyN.

[1] BOGART, W. A, (2002), Consequences: The Impact of Law and Its Complexity, University of Toronto Press, https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442673267

[2] Austin Sarat, Thomas R. Kearns,(1993), Law In Everyday Life, University of Michigan Press, https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Law_in_Everyday_Life/X3nuAAAAMAAJ?hl=en

[4] Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, I SCR 143, [1989]

[13] Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection ) Act, Section 2, [1994], http://www.scconline.com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/DocumentLink/UU9f3RiO

[14] Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection ) Act, Section 6, [1994], http://www.scconline.com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/DocumentLink/wm00H9Qj

[15] Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection ) Act, Section 25, [1994], http://www.scconline.com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/DocumentLink/Opl3v91C

[1] Author is a 4th Year Law Student of Faculty of Law, Jagran Lakecity University

[2]Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 124.

[4] Brahma Prakash Sharma and Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1954 AIR 10

[6] Samuel Roth v. United States of America L. Ed. 2d 1489

[7] C. Ravichandran Iyer v. Justice A.M. Bhattacharjee, (1995) 5 SCC 457.

[8] Radha Mohan Lal v. Rajasthan High Court, AIR 2003 SC 1467.

[9] D.C Saxena v. Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, (1996) 5 SCC 216

[10] E. M. Sankaran Namboodiripad vs T. Narayanan Nambiar, AIR 1970 SC 2015.

[11] Baradakanta v. Registrar, High Court of Orissa, AIR 1974 SC 710.

[12] Bathina Ramakrishna Reddy v. State of Madras, AIR 1952 SC 149

[13] Dr. Subramaniam Swamy v. Rama Krishna Hedge, (2000) 10 SCC 331.

[14]L.D. Jaikwal vs State of U.P., AIR 1984 SC 1374.

[15] K.A. Mohammed Ali v. C.N. Prasanaan, 1991 CriLJ 2194

[16] Twitter, https://twitter.com/pbhushan1/status/1276710603214610432?lang=en

[17] Twitter, https://twitter.com/pbhushan1/status/1277483749739917318?lang=en

[1] V.Poojasree, M.L.,(Ph.D), Assistant Professor, School of Law, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology

[2] Shylashree, IV B.B.A.LL.B(Hons), School of Law, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology

[2] Rule of Law Education Centre Australia: ruleoflaw.org.au

[3] Kesavananda Bharati vs Union of India; Secretary, State of Kerala & Ors. vs Umadevi; Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India

ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN ARMED CONFLICT (By-Gaurav Kumar Arya & Arti Chauhan)

Vishaka & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (By-Sonia Balhara)

Human Right Violation Of Women Sugarcane Workers In Maharashtra (By-AKSHAT UNIYAL)

Social Change and the Law: How the Law Affects Society (By- Swarna Mullick)

The Writ Of Continuing Mandamus – A Step Towards Development Of Constitutional Jurisprudence (By- Anwita Maheshwari)

Unaware Consumers and Consumer Rights: A Brief About Consumer Protection and Challenges of a Consumer in the Marketplace (By-Taru Singhal)

Contempt Law: Court Scandal Prevention or Court Scandal to Limit Free Speech? (By– Prakalp Shrivastava, Anam Zafar & Dishi Shivpuriya)

RIGHTS OF NATURE HISTORY OF EVOLUTION OF RIGHTS OF NATURE AND ITS STATUS IN THE 21ST CENTURY (By- Ms.V.Poojasree & Ms.Shylasree)

WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTON ACT: A REFLECTON OF PROGRESS AND PANDERING (By-Paras)

A NOTE ON THE RULE OF LAW (By- Shalini)

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation