• +91 7042148991
  • editor@ijlra.com
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
  • Home
  • Ethics & Policy
    • Duties of Authors
    • Editors Responsibilities
    • Reviewers Responsibilities
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright Policy
  • For Authors
    • About IJLRA
    • Call for Papers
    • Verify Certificate
    • Track Paper
    • Copyright Form
    • How to Publish
  • Issues
    • Past Issues
    • VOLUME 1
      • ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 5
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 6
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 7
    • VOLUME 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 10
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 5
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 6
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 8
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUIE 1
      • VOLUME II ISSUE 7
    • VOLUME 3
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 2
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 3
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 4
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 5
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 6
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 7
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 8
  • Editorial Board
  • Verify
  • Submit Paper
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
  • Home
    • Duties of Authors
    • Editors Responsibilities
    • Reviewers Responsibilities
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright Policy
    • About IJLRA
    • Call for Papers
    • Verify Certificate
    • Track Paper
    • Copyright Form
    • How to Publish
    • Past Issues
      • View VOLUME 1
      • ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 5
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 6
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 7
      • View VOLUME 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 10
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 5
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 6
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 8
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUIE 1
      • VOLUME II ISSUE 7
      • View VOLUME 3
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 2
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 3
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 4
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 5
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 6
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 7
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 8
  • Editorial Board
  • Verify Certificate Submit Paper

"The Amnesias of International Law in Kashmir Conflict: Perspectives & Narratives" (By Jeezan Riyaz)

Author Name: Jeezan Riyaz
Title: The Amnesias of International Law in Kashmir Conflict: Perspectives &
Narratives
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-25786215/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: rjeezan@gmail.com
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

Reforms In The Indian Banking System (By Sruthi. S & Theertha.K)

Author Name: Sruthi. S & Theertha.K
Title: Reforms In The Indian Banking System
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-34868556/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: sruthiabi882@yahoo.in
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

“Relevancy of Judge made Laws in Legal Research” (By Miss. Gopa Chandra Mandal)

Author Name: Miss. Gopa Chandra Mandal
Title: “Relevancy of Judge made Laws in Legal Research”
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-85139622/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: gcmandalcu@gmail.com
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

Character Evidence and its Evidentiary Value and Moral Implications in Rape Cases. (By Abhishek.A & Srijita.C)

Author Name:  Abhishek.A & Srijita.C
Title: Character Evidence and its Evidentiary Value and Moral Implications in Rape Cases.
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-45145797/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: abhishek.arul@slsh.edu.in & srijita.chattopadhyay@slsh.edu.in
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

Media Before Courts: Social Media Trials (By Khushboo Abrol)

Author Name: Khushboo Abrol
Title: Media Before Courts: Social Media Trials
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-53826391/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: khushbooabrol2012@gmail.com
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

Smell as a Trademark: Its Registrability And Challenges in India and Other Countries (By Pooja Kulkarni)

Author Name: Pooja Kulkarni
Title: Smell as a Trademark: Its Registrability And Challenges in India and Other Countries
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-58964397/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: pkulkarni563@gmail.com
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

Comparision of Anglo Hindu Law and Modern Hindu Law? (By Gaura Agarwal)

Author Name: Gaura Agarwal
Title: Comparision of Anglo Hindu Law and Modern Hindu Law?
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-98992978/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: agarwalgaura19@gmail.com
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

Detailed Analysis On The Provisions Of Anti Competitive Agreement Under The Competition Act 2002 (By S.R.Jaya salini)

Author Name: S.R.Jaya salini
Title: Detailed Analysis On The Provisions Of Anti Competitive Agreement Under The Competition Act 2002
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-58798362/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: jayasalinisr@gmail.com


  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

Issues Relating To Enforcement Of Foreign Seated Arbitration Awards In India (By Kamya Sharma)

Author Name: Kamya Sharma
Title: Issues Relating To Enforcement Of Foreign Seated Arbitration Awards In India
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-77552924/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: kamyasharma.law@gmail.com
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

Minerva Mills and ors. vs. Union of India and Ors. (1980) (By Pratibha Kumari)

Author Name: Pratibha Kumari
Title: Minerva Mills and ors. vs. Union of India and Ors. (1980)
DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-89732374/ ijlra/v2i6/April/2022
Email Id: pratibhakumari482@gmail.com
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google
« Previous Next »

Citation

[1] Michael Brecher, The Struggle for Kashmir, (New York 1953).
[1] Douglas C. Makeig, War, No- War, and the India-Pakistan Negotiating Process, 60 PAC. AFF. 271, 278 (1987).
[1] Damodar R. SarDesai, The Origins of Kashmir's International and Legal Status, in PERSPECTIVES ON KASHMIR: THE ROOTS OF CONFLICT IN SOUTH ASIA 81 (Raju G.C. Thomas, ed. 1992).
[1] Sisir Gupta, Kashmir, A Study in Indo-Pakistan Relations, (Bombay 1966).
[1] The Indian Independence, Act, 1947.
[1] V. P. Menon, The Story of the Integration: of the Indian Princely States, (Calcutta 1956).
[1] Alan Campbell Johnson, Mission with Mountbatten, (London 1951).
[1] James Howley, Alive and Kicking: The Kashmir Dispute Forty Years Later, 9 DICK. J. INT'L L.88 (1991).
[1] Letter from Lord Mountbatten to Maharaja Hari Singh (Oct. 27, 1947), in CHRISTOPHER B. BIRDWOOD, Two NATIONS AND KASHMIR 207 (1956).
[1] Nafisur Rahaman Sufi, Kashmir's Bid for Freedom, (Muzaffarabad 1956, Publication of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government, 1956).
[1] JAMMU AND KASHMIR CONST. § 3. No amendments to this section are permitted under the constitution.
[1] INDIA CONST. art. 370.
[1] Meher Chand Mahajan., Accession of Kashmir to India: The Inside Story, (Sholapur 1950).
[1] M. Zafrulla Khan, The Kashmir Dispute, (Karachi 1950).
[1] Reeta Chowdhari Tremblay, Nation Identity and the Intervening Role of the State: A Study of the Secessionist Movement in Kashmir, 69 PAC. AFF. 471, 483 (1996).
[1] Das Gupta, Jyoti Bhushan, (1968), Jammu & Kahmir, Springer, p. 187.
[1] Das Gupta, Jyoti Bhushan, (1968), Jammu & Kahmir, Springer, p. 200.
[1] Chowdhary, rekha, (2015), Jammu & Kahmir: Politics of Identity & Separatism, Roultedge, p. 48.
[1] Gowher Rizvi, India, Pakistan, and the Kashmir Problem, 1947 - 1972, in Perspectives on Kashmir,  supra note 4, at 58.
[1] Id. at 59.
[1] This pact was reinforced by Pakistan's subsequent entry into the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO) and the South East Asian Treaty Organization (SEATO).
[1] Chen, Self-Determination as a Human Right, in TOWARD WORLD ORDER AND HUMAN DIGNITY 198 (W.M. Reisman & B. Weston eds. 1976);
[1] Article 1(2), 1 UNTS, 1945.
[1] Josef Korbel, The Kashmir Dispute and the United Nations, 3 INT'L ORG. 278.
[1] Letter from the Representative of India to the President of the Security Council (Jan 1, 1948), U.N. Doc. S/628 (1948). In its complaint, India indicated that it would resolve the accession issue once conditions in Kashmir allowed.
[1] Letter from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan to the Secretary General (Jan. 15, 1948), U.N. Doc. S/646/Corr. 1 (1948).
[1] Resolution for a Cease-Fire Order and Truce Agreement Adopted by the United Nations Commission on Indian and Pakistan, U.N. SCOR, 3d Sess., at 3, U.N. Doc. S/995 (1948).
[1] Id. at 5.
[1] M.S. Rajan, The Tashkent Declaration: Retrospect & Prospect, 01st Jan, 1966.
[1] S.C. Res. 210, U.N. SCOR, 20th Sess., 1238th Mtg., U.N. Doc. S/6662 (1965).
[1] S.C. Res. 211, U.N. SCOR, 20th Sess., 1242nd Mtg., U.N. Doc. S/6694 (1965).
[1] Bratersky, Alexander (12 January 2016), At Tashkent, Soviet peace over India and Paksitan, Russia Beyond website. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
[1] A leaf from history : Simla Agreement, at last. Dawn (newspaper). 23 September 2012.
[1] Simla Agreement, supra note 83, at art. VI.
[1] Agreement between the Government of India and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on Bilateral Relations (Simla Agreement), United Nations Peacemaker.
[1] Article 103, 1 UNTS, 1945.
[1] Shamshad Ahmad, “Reversing the tide of history: Kashmir policy - an overview-II” The Dawn. August 6, 2004.
[1] Thomas P. Thornton, “A Long Way to Lahore: India and Pakistan Negotiate” in Craig Baxter, Charles H. Kennedy, (eds), Pakistan 2000, (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2001), P.67.
[1] Lahore Declaration February, 1999 A Major Initiative for Peace in South Asia Amjad Abbas Maggsi.
[1] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Update of the Situation of Human Rights in Indian-Administered Kashmir and Pakistan-Administered Kashmir  from June 2016 to April 2018, and General Human Rights Concerns in Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan.
[1] Section 11(c), Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials.
[1] LOSING SIGHT IN KASHMIR – THE IMPACT OF PELLET-FIRING SHOTGUNS, Amnesty International, INDIA.
[1] ICCPR/C/GC/37, General comment no. 37 of 2020. Human Rights Committee.
[1] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171, Artcile 4, No 47, [ICCPR].
[1] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171, Artcile 7, No 47, [ICCPR].
[1] India : Stop using Pellet – firing shot guns in Kashmir, Human Rights Watch, Sep 4, 2020.
[1] Id at 10.
[1] John Cherian, International reaction to abrogation of Article 370: Muted response, FRONTLINE, Sep 27, 2019.   
[1] IAN BROWNLIE, PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 1-31 (4th ed. 1990).
[1] Id at 49, supra note 97, at 1 I-15.
[1] JOSHUA CASTELLINO, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SELF-DETERMINATION 149 (2000).
[1] BROWNLIE, supra note 97, at 129 (discussing application of the doctrine of inter temporal law).

Citation

[1]ArunJaitley, Minister of Finance, Corporate Affairs and Information & Broadcasting, India,
Statement at the Thirty Third Meeting of International Monetary and Financial Committee
[1]"India Development Update", World Bank Report 151554
[1]  Under the Chairmanship of Shri S.S.Tarapore (former Deputy Governor)
[1] (1999) 4 SCC 69
[1] (2000) 100 Compo Cases 257 (Mad) (HC)
[1]AIR 1997 Guj. 75
[1] AIR 2000 SC 1535
[1]Saurav Harsh Son Of Shri Harish vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 November, 2018
[1]Given in Third Schedule of the B. R. Act.
[1] Agreed upon by the members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in 2010-11
[1] Introduced in Lok Sabha by the Minister of Finance, Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman, on March 3, 2020
[1]https://www.livemint.com/news/india
[1] 1970 3 SCR 530
[1] (1989) 4 SCC 90
[1] AIR 1986 SC 1370
[1] AIR 1961 Mad 8
[1] 143 ER 441
[1] (2001)3 SCC 726
[1] AIR 2016
[1] Ibid.
[1] W.P. No. 21814 (W) of 2017

Citation

[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process 19 (Yale University, 1961).
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Growth of the Law xii - xiv (Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1924).
[1] Cf. Pound, “Courts and Legislation” 226, 9 Modern Legal Philosophy Series.
[1] Ibid.
[1] Act 43 of 1954.
[1] Act 2 of 1974.
[1] Prof. (Mrs.) Nomita Agarwal, Jurisprudence -(Legal Theory) 63 (Central Law Publications, Allahabad, 4th Ed. 2003).
[1] Part III, The Constitution of India.
[1] Right to free and compulsory education under Article 21A is a new addition under the right to life in the year 2002. The society felt the need to educate its children in order to make them more aware of the social change taking place around him or her. The way it was carried out was by law so as to make education a compulsory necessity for all children up to 14 years of age.
[1] A. Lakshmi Nath, Precedent in The Indian Legal System 16 (Eastern Book Company, Lucknow, 1990).
[1] A V Dicey, Lectures on the relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century 362 (1905).
[1] Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v. West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 All ER 98; Rainy Sky SA v. Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 W.L.R. 2900; Arnold v. Britton [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] A.C. 1619; Wood v. Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, [2017] A.C. 1173.
[1] Marks & Spencer Plc v. BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, [2016] A.C. 742.
[1] Marley v. Rawlings [2015] AC 129.
[1] Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, [2017] A.C. 467.
[1] Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562, 1932 SC (HL) 31.
[1] Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v. Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] A.C. 465
[1] Hedley Byrne (Supra); Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605; Customs and Excise Commissioners v. Barclays Bank [2007] 1 AC 181.
[1] McLoughlin v. O’Brian [1983] 1 AC 410; Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310
[1] Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v. Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd [1967] 1 A.C. 617.
[1] OBG v. Allan [2008] 1 AC 1.
[1] The Sale of Goods Act 1893 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland which regulated contracts in which goods are sold and bought. The whole of this Act, except for Section 26 was repealed on January 1, 1980, subject to a number of savings. Section 26 was repealed on January 1, 1982. The 1893 Act is still operative in Ireland, although it has been amended on a number of occasions since it came into force.
[1] Nichol v. Godts (1854) 10 Ex. 191, Jones v. Just (1867-68) L.R. 3 Q.B. 197, Mody v. Gregson (1868-69) L.R. 4 Ex. 49 and Drummond & Sons v. Van Ingen & Co (1887) 12 App. Cas 284.
[1] [1932] AC 562, 1932 SC (HL) 31.
[1] Fons et origo is a Latin term meaning the ‘source and origin’.
[1] Anns v. Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728, 751 per Lord Wilberforce.
[1] Murphy v. Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 AC 398.
[1] Caparo Industries Plc v. Dickman [1990] 2 A.C. 605, Michael v. Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2, [2015] A.C. 1732; Robinson v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4; [2018] A.C. 736
[1] See, Lewis N Klar, Judicial Activism in Private law (2001) 80 Canadian Bar Review 251-240.
[1] Cox v. Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10, [2016] A.C. 660.
[1] Lister v. Hesley Hall Ltd. [2002] 1 AC 215 (sexual abuse); Mohamud v. WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc [2016] UKSC 11, [2016] A.C. 677 (assault); Catholic Child Welfare Society v. Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools [2012] UKSC 56, [2013] 2 A.C. 1 (the concept of enterprise risk).
[1] Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11, [2015] A.C. 1430.
[1] Douglas and others v. Hello! Ltd and others (No 3) [2008] 1 A.C. 1; Campbell v. Mirror Group Newspapers [2004] 2 AC 457.
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Growth of the Law 2 (Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1924).
[1] AIR 1975 SC 907: (1975) 2 SCC 324.
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Growth of the Law 96 - 97 (Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1924).
[1] Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning ‘to stand by decided cases.’
[1] Sakshi v. Union of India, AIR 2004 SCW 3449; Shanker Raju v. Union of India (2011) 2 SCC 132.
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo.
[1] Union of India v. Raghubir Singh (1989) 2 SCC 754; Purbanchal Cables v. Assam Electricity Board (2012) 7 SCC 462.
[1] Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar (2019) 4 SCC 197.

Citation

[1] Ronald J. Hof, Character Evidence, 21 Loy. L. Rev. 405 (1975).
[1] Vol 2, Woodroffe and Amir Ali, Law of Evidence Lexis Nexis 2396 ( 21st ed Shakil Ahmed Khan, 2020).
[1] Vol 2, Batuk Lal, The Law of Evidence (In India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Malaysia) 1598 (6th ed. 2015).
[1] Id.
[1] Batuk Lal, Law of Evidence 411 (22nd ed.,Dr. Surendra Sahai Srivastava 2018).
[1] Woodroffe & Amir Ali, supra, 2399.
[1] Vol 2, Woodroffe and Amir Ali, Law of Evidence Lexis Nexis 2397 ( 21st ed Shakil Ahmed Khan, 2020
[1] Batuk Lal, Law of Evidence 411 (22nd ed.,Dr. Surendra Sahai Srivastava 2018).
[1] Avilash Kumbhar, Bad Character of the Accused, Academia (4/3/20, 17:13) https://www.academia.edu/8132651/Evidence_of_Bad_Character_of_the_Accused
[1] Bhagwan Swarup v. State of Maharashta AIR 1965 SC 982.
[1] Raja v. State of Karnataka (2016) 10 SCC 506.
[1] Raju v. State of M.P (2008) 15 SCC 133.
[1] Avilash Kumbhar, Bad Character of the Accused, Academia (4/3/20, 17:13) https://www.academia.edu/8132651/Evidence_of_Bad_Character_of_the_Accused
[1] Indian Evidence Act 1872, Act 1 of 1872, Section 53A.
[1] State of U.P v. Pappu (2005) 3 SCC 594.
[1] Raja v. State of Karnataka (2016) 10 SCC 506.
[1] Lillu v. State of Haryana (2013) 14 SCC 643.
[1] State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996) 2 SCC 384.
[1] State of U.P v. Munshi ((2008) 9 SCC 390.

Citation

[1] Are Fair Trials Possible In Today’s World Of Social Media, availale at: https://www.iarani.com/blogs/are-fair-trials-possible-in-todays-world-of-social-media Are fair trials possible in today’s world of social media? (last visited on 16th October 2020)

[1] Ibid
[1] Robert Grant, Joseph Katz, The Great Trials of the Twenties: The Watershed decade in America’s Courtrooms, Sarpedon, 1998. 
[1] How the O.J. Simpson murder trial 20 years ago changed the media landscape, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/how-the-oj-simpson-murder-trial-20-years-ago-changed-the-media-landscape/2014/06/09/a6e21df8-eccf-11e3-93d2-edd4be1f5d9e_story.html (last visited on 14th October 2020)
[1] 200th Report of the Law Commission on “Trial by Media: Free Speech v Fair Trial Under Criminal Procedure (Amen dmentstotheContemptofCourtAct,1971)”
[1] Tata Press Ltd. v. Mahanagar Telecom Nigam Ltd., AIR 19955SCC 139
[1] State of Kerala and Anr. v. N.M. Thomas and Ors., AIR 1976SC 490.
[1] Justice R.S. Chauhan Trial by Media: An International Perspective, available at: http://www.supremecourtcases.com/index2.php.,last visited on 14th October 2020.
[1] Abolish Rather & Konica Satan, Judicial Intervention in the Sub-judice-The emerging issues of Trial by Media, Bharati Law Review, (2015).
[1](1992) 2 SCC 105 

[1] What is the Jessica Lall murder case?, available at: https://www.google.com/amp/s/indianexpress.com/article/what-is/what-is-the-jessica-lal-murder-case/lite/ (last visited on 17th October 2020)

[1] Ibid

[1] (2010) 9 SCC 747
[1] Nupur Talwar v Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (AIR 2012 SC 1921)
[1]Arpan Banerjee, judicial Safeguards Against “Trial By Media” : Should Blasi’s “Checking Value” Theory Apply In India? Vol.2,p. 28,Journal of Media Law& Ethics, (2010).
[1] Article 129- “The Supreme court shall be a court of record and shall have all powers of such a court
including the power to punish for contempt of itself”
 Article 215- “Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court
including power to punish for contempt of itself”
[1] ibid
[1] Commissioner, Agra v Rohtas Singh, AIR 1998 SC 685
[1] (2007) 98 DRJ 41.

Citation

[1] Section 2(m) of Indian Trademarks Act, 1999
[1] Article 15(1) of TRIPS Agreement
[1] Trade Marks Rules,2017 Rule 26
[1] P. Narayanan, Intellectual Property Law, Third Edition, page no.147.
[1] P.Narayanan, Intellectual Property Law, Third Edition,page no.147.
[1] Lakmikant V.Patel v. Chetanbhat Shah, AIR 002 SC 275.
[1] Section 2(1)(m) of Trade Marks Act, 1999
[1] Section 2(1)(zb) of Trade Marks Act, 1999
[1] Mohit Joshi, Smell Mark-New Era, International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 3, issue 3, 2020, ISSN 2581-5569
[1] Xavier Morales, Can I Trademark an Odor or Smell?, available at https://secureyourtrademark.com/blog/ (last visited on 15/03/2022)
[1]Non-Conventional Trademark-Smell Marks, available at  https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/non-conventional-trademark-smell-marks/ (last visited on 15/03/2022)
[1] Supra 7 and 8
[1]Javvadshaikh, Olfactory Marks(Smell Marks, available at  https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-2928-olfactory-marks-smell-marks-.html, (last visited on 18/03/2022)
[1] Ralf Sieckman vs Deutsches Patent, European Court of Justice Case
[1] Ellis, Can smell be a trademark, August 24, 2016, available at https://trademarkroom.com/blog/item/can-a-smell-be-a-trade-mark/ , (last visited on 18/03/2022)
[1] Raja Selvam, What is Smell Mark or Scent Mark?, March 11, 2013, available at https://selvams.com/blog/smell-trademark/ (last visited on 19/03/2022)
[1]Section 2(f) United States Trademark Act,(The Lanham Act),1946
[1] IN RE CELIA CLARKE, DBA CLARKE’S OSEWEZ, September 19, 1990, available at https://ipmall.law.unh.edu/content/ttab-trademark-trial-and-appeal-board-1-re-celia-clarke-dba-clarkes-osewez-serial-no-758429 (last visited on 21/03/2022)
[1] Ayatalla Lewih, How to Trade Mark Colours, Scents, Sounds and Shapes, available at https://legalvision.com.au/4-types-of-trade-marks-explained/ (last visited on 22/03/2022)
[1] supra 8 and 9
[1] livemint, available at https://www.livemint.com/Home-Page/5z2B1NQUy3YyPkpRDp789M/Yahoo-awarded-India8217s-first-sound-mark-Nokia-in-queue.html , (last visited on 23/02/2022)
[1]The contemporary issue of the non-conventional trademarks, june 2, 2021, available at,  https://www.legal500.com/developments/thought-leadership/the-contemporary-issue-of-the-non-conventional-trademarks/ , June 2, 2021 (last visited on 23/02/2022)
[1] The Trademark Act, supra note 9
[1] supra note 15
[1] Government of India, Manual of Trademark, available at , https://ipindia.gov.in/writereaddata/Portal/IPOGuidelinesManuals/1_32_1_tmr-draft-manual.pdf
?       Mohit Joshi, SMELL MARK: A NEW ERA, International Journal on Law Management and Humanities, 2020,Vol 3,Issue 3, ISSN 2581-5369.
?       Tanushree Roy, “REGISTRABILITY OF SMELL MARK AS TRADEMARK: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS”, Journal on Contemporary issue of Law, Vol 4, Issue 3, ISSN 2455-4782.
?       WIPO Magazine, Smell, Sound and taste- Getting a sense of Non-Traditional Marks.
?       Aakrishiti Kumar, SMELL MARKS: SHOULD INDIA START SNIFFING, India Legal, December 12, 2020
Cases:
?       Lakmikant V.Patel v. Chetanbhat Shah, AIR 002 SC 275.
?        Ralf Sieckman vs Deutsches Patent, European Court of Justice Case 

Citation

·         Bannigan, John (1952, December 3). The Hindu Code Bill. Far Eastern Survey: American Institute of Pacific Relations, XX1.
·         Kishwar, Madhu (1990, May, 30). Codified Hindu Law: Myth and Reality.
·         Menski, Werner. Comparative Law in a Global Context : The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. New York: Cambridge UP, 2006.
·         Nagpal, Ramesh C. Modern Hindu Law. Allahabad: Manav Law House, 1983.
[1]
1.      Ludo Rocher (1972), Indian response to Anglo-Hindu law, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 92(3),
2.     ^ Rosane Rocher, "The creation of Anglo-Hindu law" in Lubin, Davis & Krishnan, Hinduism and Law (2010),
3.     ^ Jump up to:a b c d Donald R. Davis, Jr., "A historical overview of Hindu law" in Lubin, Davis & Krishnan, Hinduism and Law (2010),
4.     ^ Jump up to:a b c d Michael Anderson in Arnold, David; Robb, Peter; Robb, Peter G. (1993), Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader, Psychology Press,
5.     ^ Cohn, Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge (1996)
        6.^ Jump up to:a b Washbrook, D. A. (1981). "Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial                   India". Modern Asian Studies. 15 (3): 649–721. . JSTOR 312295.
7.^ Kugle, Scott Alan (May 2001). "Framed, Blamed and Renamed: The Recasting of Islamic Jurisprudence in Colonial South Asia". [2]
8.J. D. M. Derrett, Religion, Law, and the State in India (London: Faber, 1968), 96; For a related distinction between religious and secular law in Dharma??stra, see Lubin, Timothy (2007). "Punishment and Expiation: Overlapping Domains in Brahmanical Law". Indologica Taurinensia. 33: 93–122. SSRN 1084716.
9.^ K Ewing (1988), Sharia and ambiguity in South Asian Islam, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0520055759
10.^ A digest of Moohummudan law on the subjects to which it is usually applied by British courts of justice in India Neil Baillie, Smith, Elder & Co. London
11.^ Jump up to:a b c Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber; Rudolph, Lloyd I. (August 2000). "Living with Difference in India". The Political Quarterly. Wiley. 71 (s1): 20–38. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.71.s1.4.
12.^ Jump up to:a b c AK Giri in Costa, Pietro; Zolo, Danilo (2007), The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism, Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 596–597, ISBN 978-1-4020-5745-8
13.^ Llewellyn-Jones, Rosie (2007), The Great Uprising in India, 1857-58: Untold Stories, Indian and British, Boydell & Brewer, pp. 111–112, ISBN 978-1-84383-304-8
14.^ Cook, David (23 May 2005), Understanding Jihad, University of California Press, pp. 80–83, ISBN 978-0-520-93187-9
15.^ Kunal Parker in Larson, Gerald James, ed. (2001), Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment, Indiana University Press, 
 

[1] Modern Hindu Law
[2] Anglo Hindu Law

Citation

[1] Avtar Singh book on “Competition Law” by EBC edition 2021
[1] Section 3 of the competition act 2002
[1] Avtar Singh book on “Competition Law” by EBC edition 2021
[1] Versha Vahini Textbook on “Indian Competition Law” by Lexis Nexis edition 2021
Bare act – The competition act 2002
[1] 255 U.S. 81 (1921)
[1] Case No. 29 of 2010
[1] Versha Vahini Textbook on “Indian Competition Law” by Lexis Nexis edition 2021
[1] https://www.cci.gov.in
\[1] Case No. 24 of 2011
[1] Case No. 29 of 2018
[1] Case No. 61 of 2014
[1] Avtar Singh book on “Competition Law” by EBC edition 2021
[1] Section 19(3) of the competition act 2002
[1] Section 32 of the competition act 2002
[1] Case No. 33 of 2011
[1] Section 26 of the competition act 2002
[1] Section 19 of the competition act 2002
[1] Section 27 of the competition act 2002
[1] Section 33 of the competition act 2002

Citation

1 S K Dholakia, Analytical Appraisal of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2003, 39 ICA?S ARB. QUAT. 3 (2005). 2 (1992) 2 Arb LR 154: AIR 1993 SC 998: (1992) 3 SCC 511. 3 See para 19 of National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd v. Singer Co 4 1998 AIR 825, 1997( 6 )Suppl.SCR 186, 1998( 1 )SCC 305, 1997( 7 ) SCALE338 , 1997( 9 )JT 666
6 Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Sec. Irrigation Dept., MANU/SC/7460/2008 : (2008) 7 SCC 169 : (AIR 2009 SC (Supp) 396) and Union of India v. Popular Construction Co., MANU/SC/0613/2001 : (2001) 8 SCC 470 : (AIR 2001 SC 4010) 7 State of West Bengal v. Associated Contractors, AIR 2015 SC 260.
8 1994 (4) SCC 541. 9 (Civil Appeal No 1650 of 2018) 10 Commercial Courts Act, s 2(1)(i), “Specified Value”, in relation to a commercial dispute, shall mean the value of the subject-matter in respect of a suit as determined in accordance with section 12 which shall not be less than one crore rupees or such higher value, as may be notified by the Central Government 11 1995 Supp (2) SCC 280.
12 Noy Vallesina v Jindal Drugs Limited 2006 (5) BomCR 155 13 The Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, section- 49 14 2007 (1) RAJ 339 (Bom), AIR 1986 Gujarat 62. 15 2001 (6) SCC 356. 16 M/s. Fuerst Day Lawson Pvt. Ltd v. Jindal Exports Pvt. Ltd. 2001 (6) SCC 356.
17 BALCO v. Kaiser Aluminum, (2012) 9 SCC 552.
 18 Ibid 19 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5085 OF 2013
 20 Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa, (2014) 2 SCC 433.
21 Law Commission of India, 176TH REPORT ON ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2001, at 68.
22 Frances Van Eupen, Reach of Judicial Review of arbitral award, INT. A.L.R., N-75 (2008).

Citation

[1] https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/
·         http://lawtimesjournal.in/
·         https://www.barandbench.com/
·         https://www.legitquest.com/

Citation 2

65876451 adaskdjlkh lkhlkhasd

IJLRA N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

Ready to Publish Your Legal Research?

Submit your manuscript to IJLRA or track the status of an already submitted paper.

Submit Paper Track Paper
IJLRA

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis (IJLRA) is an open-access, peer-reviewed academic legal journal providing a platform for contemporary legal research and interdisciplinary scholarship.

Open Access Peer Reviewed ISSN 2582-6433
  • +91-7042148991
  • editor@ijlra.com

LAW JOURNAL

  • About Us
  • Verify Certificate
  • Editorial Board
  • Past Issues
  • Contact Us

IMPORTANT LINKS

  • Call for Papers
  • How to Publish Paper
  • Submit Paper
  • Track Paper Status
  • Search Articles & Issues

ETHICS & POLICY

  • Duties of Authors
  • Editors Responsibilities
  • Reviewers Responsibilities
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Copyright Policy

© 2026 International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

All Rights Reserved