INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN CORPORATE LAW: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSING PATENT AND TRADEMARK ISSUES. BY - REETAMBHAR KUMAR DAS

Authors : REETAMBHAR KUMAR DAS

Registration ID : 107825 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7825

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : reetambharkrdas1999@gmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-95437647/INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN CORPORATE LAW: RESEARCH M

ADVANCEMENTS IN TECHNOLOGY AND THE DIGITAL AGE: INFLUENCES ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN CYBER CRIMES AND DIGITAL EVIDENCE CASES BY - TANYA ELIZABETH MATHEW

Authors : TANYA ELIZABETH MATHEW

Registration ID : 107824 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7824

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : tanyamt119@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-31343883/ADVANCEMENTS IN TECHNOLOGY AND THE DIGITAL AGE: IN

THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO LEGAL AID IN INDIA: AN ASSESSMENT BY - MIRZA ADEEB JIAN

Authors : MIRZA ADEEB JIAN

Registration ID : 107823 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7823

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : mirza23@nluassam.ac.in

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-92587264/THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO LEGAL AID IN

“FREEDOM TO DO BUSINESS AND TRADE IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL PREROGATIVES AND JUDICIAL DYNAMISM” BY - DHILAN SARMA

Authors : DHILAN SARMA

Registration ID : 107822 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7822

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : dhilan23@nluassam.ac.in

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-25277477/“FREEDOM TO DO BUSINESS AND TRADE IN INDIA: CONS

HORIZONTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN INDIA – NEED AND CHALLENGES BY - ADARSH GOGOI

Authors : ADARSH GOGOI

Registration ID : 107821 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7821

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : adarshgogoi90@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-25773833/HORIZONTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN IN

ONE PERSON COMPANY IN INDIA & ITS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM (U.K) BY: TAMANNA BANSAL

Authors : TAMANNA BANSAL

Registration ID : 107820 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7820

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : tamannabansal07@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-49667969/ONE PERSON COMPANY IN INDIA & ITS COMPARATIVE ANAL

RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATION IN INDIA: EXPLAINED HORIZONTALLY BY - PRIYANSH KANAWAT

Authors : PRIYANSH KANAWAT

Registration ID : 107819 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7819

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : priyansh23@nluassam.ac.in

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-42286814/RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATION IN INDIA: EXPLAINED HOR

SETTING THE BLOCKS FOR ASEAN: HOW IP INJECTION CAN INCREASE THE FRUITFULNESS OF AEC AND ITS GOAL OF 2025 BY - ABHISHEK SHARMA, ANNANY MAMGAIN & ARYAN GARG

Authors : ABHISHEK SHARMA, ANNANY MAMGAIN & ARYAN GARG

Registration ID : 107817 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7817 & IJLRA7818

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : abhisheksharma6820000@gmail.com & mamgainannany@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-64869658/SETTING THE BLOCKS FOR ASEAN: HOW IP INJECTION CAN

UNDERSTANDING CYBER ESPIONAGE AND STATE-SPONSORED ATTACKS BY - DEEPANSHI SRIVASTAVA

Authors : DEEPANSHI SRIVASTAVA

Registration ID : 107816 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7816

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : deepanshisrivastava462@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-32156566/UNDERSTANDING CYBER ESPIONAGE AND STATE-SPONSORED

AN OVERVIEW OF DIRECT TAXES CODE BILL BY- AYUSH PATIDAR & SNEHA SHARMA

Authors : AYUSH PATIDAR & SNEHA SHARMA

Registration ID : 107814 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7814 & IJLRA7815

Year : May-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ayushpatidar99933@gmail.com & sharmasneha00123@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2024-13997372/AN OVERVIEW OF DIRECT TAXES CODE BILL

[1] Lalit Jajpura, Bhupinder Singha and Rajkishore Nayak, ‘An Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights and their Importance in Indian Context’, Vol 22 2017 https://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/41C26FED-7AFE-40EA-8736-4E6C516917AE.pdf

[3] Máté, D., Kun, A.I. and Fenyves ‘’ The Impacts of Trademarks and Patents on Labour Productivity in the Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Sectors’ https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/168990/1/aej-v18-i41-p104.pdf

[5] V. K. Unni,’ Indian Patent Law and TRIPS: Redrawing the Flexibility Framework in the Context of Public Policy and Health’, Vol 25 Issue 1 https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/303865429.pdf

[6] Mohammad Amin Naser, “Rethinking the Foundations of Trademarks”, Vol 5 Issue 1, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236347735.pdf

[7] Danai Christopoulou · Nikolaos Papageorgiadis · Chengang Wang & Georgios Magkonis, (2021) “IPR law protection and enforcement”https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11575-021-00443-0

^{^[8]} Supreet Kaur ‘Interface between Intellectual Property and Competition Law: Essential Facilities Doctrine’ (2011) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1802450

^{^[9]}Santanu Mukherjee, ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Patents: Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights’, (2023) https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004542815_003

[10] Mimansha Patel & Nitin Patel “Exploring Research Methodology: Review Article”, Vol 6 issue 3, (2019) https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.6_Issue.3_March2019/IJRR0011.pdf

^{^[11]}Diamond v. Chakraborty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980)

[12] “THE BAYH–DOLE ACT (P.L. 96–517, AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK ACT OF 1980)— THE NEXT 25 YEARS” (June 2007)https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg36592/pdf/CHRG-110hhrg36592.pdf

^{^[13]}Chandra Nath Saha and Sanjib Bhattacharya, “Intellectual property rights: An overview and implications in pharmaceutical industry” Vol 2(2) (2011) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217699/

[16] Roche v. Bolar 733 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1984)

[17] Zakir Thomas, “Patenting of Research Tools - Issues and Some Pointers”, Vol 20 Issue 2, (2008) https://repository.nls.ac.in/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=nlsir

[18] Richa Kumar, “RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADEMARK LAWS IN INDIA”, Vol 2 Issue 1, https://jlrjs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1.-Richa-Kumar.pdf

[19] TANDON & CO ADVOCATES AND SOLICITORS “Overview of trademark laws in India”

^{^[1]} Marina Mati? Boškovi?, Cybercrime Money Laundering Cases And Digital Evidence, Vol. 66, Iss: 4, pp 451-167, 26 Jan 2023.

^{^[2]} Gerhard Wagner, Liability Rules for the Digital Age, Journal of European Tort Law-Vol. 13, Iss: 3, pp 191-243, 01 Dec 2022.

^{^[3]} Digital Criminal Evidence in Traditional Crime, Vol. 2021, Iss: 1, 30 July 2022.

^{^[4]} Lindsay Freeman, Raquel Vazquez Llorente, Finding the Signal in the Noise seInternational Criminal Evidence and Procedure in the Digital Age, Journal of International Criminal Justice (Oxford Academic)-Vol. 19, Iss: 1, pp 163-188, 13 Sep 2021.

^{^[5]} Fixing Liabilities for Technology in Cyber Crimes – A Critical Analysis, Vol. 09, Iss: 01, pp 51-64, 01 Jan 2023.

^{^[6]} The New York Times, 'Global Ransomware Attack: What We Know and Don't Know,' The New York Times.

^{^[7]} David E. Sanger et al., 'How Russian Hackers Infiltrated the U.S. Government,' The New York Times.

^{^[8]} United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2017).

^{^[9]} Verizon, 2020 Data Breach Investigations Report (Verizon 2020).

^{^[10]} Verizon, 2020 Data Breach Investigations Report (Verizon 2020).

^{^[11]} Symantec, Internet Security Threat Report 2021 (Symantec 2021).

^{^[12]} Symantec, Internet Security Threat Report 2021 (Symantec 2021).

^{^[13]} International Data Corporation (IDC), Worldwide Global DataSphere Forecast, 2020-2024 (IDC #US46262620, Nov. 2020).

^{^[15]} Apple Inc. v. FBI, 256 F. Supp. 3d 142 (D.D.C. 2017).

^{^[17]} Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance) OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88.

^{^[18]} Case C-177/20, Google LLC v. Commission, [2022] 1 C.M.L.R. 1.

[1] S. Muralidhar, Law, poverty and legal aid: Access to criminal justice 32 (LexisNexis Butterworths) (2004)

[2] Noorani Abdul Gafoor Abdul Majeed, Indian political trials 1775-1947 (Oxford Univ. Press) (2008)

[3] S. Muralidhar, Law, poverty and legal aid: Access to criminal justice 36-37 (LexisNexis Butterworths) (2004)

[5] Austin, Granville, Working a Democratic Constitution(Oxford India Paperbacks, New Delhi) (1999).

[6] S. Muralidhar, Law, poverty and legal aid: Access to criminal justice 45 (LexisNexis Butterworths) (2004)

[9] Legal Services Authorities Act, No. 39, Acts of Parliament, 1987 (India).

[10] Volume 51, Dubin John, “Clinical Design for Social Justice Imperatives”, 1463-1466, Southern Methodist University Law Review 1998. 1461

[11] Volume 13, Bloch, Frank and M.R.K. Prasad, “Institutionalizing a Social Justice Mission for Clinical Legal Education: Cross-national Currents from India and the United States”, 165, Clinical Law Review 2006.

[12] Rule 31, Chapter III, Bar Council of India Rules on Legal Education, 2008.

[13]India Const. art. 39A, amended by The Constitution (Forty-Second Amendment) Act, 1976.

[16]Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra, (1983) 2 SCC 96 (India).

[17]Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 98 (India).

[18]Khatri and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors, (1981) 1 SCC 627 (India).

[19] National Legal Services Authority, https://nalsa.gov.in/ (last visited May 13, 2024)

[20] Lok Adalat National Legal Services Authority, https://nalsa.gov.in/lok-adalat (last visited May 13, 2024)

[21] National Legal Services Authority, https://nalsa.gov.in/ (last visited May 13, 2024)

[22]Government of Assam Legislative Assam State Legal Services Authority Para-Legal Volunteers | Assam State Legal Services Authority | Government Of Assam, India, https://aslsa.assam.gov.in/portlets/para-legal-volunteers#:~:text=During%20the%20year%202009%2C%20National,process%20of%20Para%2DLegal%20Volunteers (last visited May 13, 2024

[1] Mariya Paliwala, Freedom of Trade, Commerce and Intercourse: Articles 301 - 307 of the Indian Constitution, iPleaders (Jan. 17, 2020), https://blog.ipleaders.in/freedom-trade-commerce-intercourse-articles-301-307-indian-constitution/ (last visited May 2, 2024).

[2] constitution pdf - Google Search, https://www.google.com/search?q=constitution+pdf&sca_esv=0f51fc7f84b82f2c&sxsrf=ADLYWILF6oCEUgJupyxIZN_hu5DHtBaqiA%3A1715543307849&ei=Cx1BZpbBM5_Avr0P_tKV2A4&ved=0ahUKEwjW8tfr8IiGAxUfoK8BHX5pBesQ4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=constitution+pdf&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiEGNvbnN0aXR1dGlvbiBwZGYyChAjGIAEGCcYigUyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgARI_yNQ5QdYsiJwAXgBkAEAmAGZAqABuBmqAQYwLjEwLja4AQPIAQD4AQGYAhGgAqsaqAIUwgIHECMYJxjqAsICFBAAGIAEGJECGLQCGIoFGOoC2AEBwgIWEAAYAxi0AhjlAhjqAhiMAxiPAdgBAsICBBAjGCfCAgoQABiABBhDGIoFwgINEAAYgAQYsQMYQxiKBcICCxAAGIAEGLEDGIMBwgIOEAAYgAQYsQMYgwEYigXCAgsQABiABBiRAhiKBcICDhAAGIAEGJECGLEDGIoFwgIKEAAYgAQYFBiHAsICCBAAGIAEGLEDmAMRugYGCAEQARgBugYGCAIQARgLkgcGMS4xMC42oAfJkQE&sclient=gws-wiz-serp (last visited May 3, 2024).

[5] Freedom of Trade, Commerce and Intercourse under the Indian Constitution, 1950, Century Law Firm Blog (Aug. 24, 2023), https://www.centurylawfirm.in/blog/freedom-of-trade-commerce-and-intercourse-under-the-indian-constitution-1950/ (last visited May 3, 2024).

[6] Mariya Paliwala, Freedom of Trade, Commerce and Intercourse: Articles 301 - 307 of the Indian Constitution, iPleaders (Jan. 17, 2020), https://blog.ipleaders.in/freedom-trade-commerce-intercourse-articles-301-307-indian-constitution/ (last visited May 13, 2024).

[7] Freedom of Trade, Commerce and Intercourse under the Indian Constitution, 1950, https://www.centurylawfirm.in/blog/freedom-of-trade-commerce-and-intercourse-under-the-indian-constitution-1950/ (last visited May 3, 2024).

[8] M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, (1997) 1 SCC 388.

[9] State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala, 1957 AIR 699 1957 SCR 874.

[10] Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka, 1995 (1) SCC 574.

[11] Manupatra, Freedom of Trade, Commerce and Intercourse in India, https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details?id=undefined&ifile=undefined (last visited May 3, 2024).

[12] [Solved] The concept of the Freedom of trade in India’s Constitut, Testbook, https://testbook.com/question-answer/the-concept-of-the-freedom-of-trade-in-indias--5fc09fbb4a4b427af7cfb2f0 (last visited May 3, 2024).

[13] Alagaapuram R. Mohanraj v. Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, AIR 2016 SC 867.

[15] State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab, (2005) 8 SCC 534.

[16] Kailash Nath v. State of U.P, AIR 1957 SC 790.

[18] Atiabari Tea Co., Ltd. vs The State of Assam And Ors, AIR 1961 SC 232 : 1961 1 SCR 809

[19] Automobile Transport Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan, 1962 AIR 1406.

[20] State of Mysore vs Sanjeeviah, 1967 SCR (2) 361.

[21] G.K. Krishna vs State of Tamil Nadu, 1975 AIR 583.

[22] Relationship between Corporate and Commercial Laws, https://www.ezylegal.in/blogs/what-is-the-relationship-and-difference-between-corporate-and-commercial-law (last visited May 3, 2024).

[23] Mridula Sharma, Commercial Laws, Meanings, Areas, Legal Issues, PHYSICS WALLAH (Apr. 13, 2024), https://www.pw.live/exams/ca/commercial-laws/ (last visited May 3, 2024).

[24] Commercial laws in India a Bird’s-eye view | Lawsisto Article News, https://lawsisto.com/artcileread/Mzg0/Commercial-laws-in-India-a-Birds-eye-view (last visited May 3, 2024).

[1] M.P Jain, Indian Constitutional Law, LexisNexis, (2018).

[2] Carmen Martinez-Capdevila, Fundamental Rights Challenges: Horizontal Effectiveness, Rule of Law and Margin of National Appreciation, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, (2022).

[3] Dr.Gautam Bhatia, Horizontal Rights: An Institutional Approach, Hart Publishing, (2023).

[4] Sanu R. Paul, The Need for Horizontal Application of Fundamental Rights in India with Reference to State Action Doctrine in the Context of Globalisation, 2, Christ University, 90, (2013).

[5] Robert H. Walker. The Modern Corporate State: Private Governments and the American Constitution. Praeger Publishers Inc (1976).

[6] M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, A.I.R. 1987 S.C. 1086.

[7] Bharat Kumar K. Palicha and Anr. v. State of Kerala and Ors, A.I.R. 1997 Ker. 291.

[9] Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Engineering, [1970]3 SCR 363.

[10] Horizontality under the Indian Constitution: A Schema – Constitutional Law and Philosophy, https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/ (last visited May 12, 2024).

[11] Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC. 3011.

[12] Medha Kotwal Lele v. Union of India, AIR ONLINE 2012 SC 632.

[13] New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).

[14] R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1995 AIR 264 1994 SCC (6) 632 JT 1994 (6) 514.

[16] Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[17] MSI RECKONER, Gender ready reckoner report.

[18] M.C.Mehta v State of Tamil nadu, AIR (1997) SC 699.

[19] Akshit Rajpal, Enforceability of Fundamental Rights on Private Individuals, LEX INSIGHT JOURNAL, ISSUE 1 VOL.1, (2019).

[20] Horizontal application of Fundamental Rights: Issues and Concerns, https://redescreation.in/horizontal-application.html (last visited May 13, 2024).

[3] Committee Report. [online] Available at: http://www.primedirectors.com/pdf/JJ%20Irani%20Report-MCA.pdf [Accessed 1 Oct. 2018]

[5] One Person Company- A Concept For New Age Business Ownership - Corporate/Commercial Law - India. [online] Available at: http://www.mondaq.com/india/x/278154/Corporate%2BCommercial%2BLaw/One%2BPerson%2BCompany%2BA%2BConcept%2BFor%2BNew%2BAge%2BBusiness%2BOwnership [Accessed 1 Oct. 2018].

[8] Legalservicesindia.com. (2018). One Person Company under Companies Act 2013. [online] Available at: http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1758/One-Person-Company-under-Companies-Act-2013.html [Accessed 1 Oct. 2018].

[9] Rule 3 of Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014.

[10] Rule 4 of Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014.

[11] Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013. (2018). At Chapter Xi.

[16] Corporate Law Reporter. (2018). An Analysis of One Person Company under Companies Act 2013 – by Karandeep Makkar. [online] Available at: http://corporatelawreporter.com/2013/10/17/analysis-one-person-company-companies-act-2013-karandeep-makkar/?s=one%20person%20company [Accessed 1 Oct. 2018].

[17] Delep Goswami and Anirrud Goswami, “One Person Company – Boon In Pursuit Of Professional Excellence”, Chartered Secretary, August 2014, pp. 32-35, at p. 33.

[22] Ierj.in. (2018). [online] Available at: http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/viewFile/43/36 [Accessed 1 Oct. 2018].

[27] Section 9 – 13 of the UK Companies Act, 2006.

[1] People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235: 1982 SCC (L&S) 275 at page 252

[2] Vishal Jeet vs Union of India and Ors, 1990 SCR (2) 861

[3] Doe, John. "Legal Framework for Combating Human Trafficking in India." (2018)

[4] "Victim Protection Mechanisms in Indian Anti-Trafficking Laws." International Law Journal of Judicial Sciences 32 (2017): 189-215.

[5] State Of U.P. And Anr vs Pramod Kumar Shukla and Anr, 2008 (12) SCC 267

[6] Vishal Jeet vs Union Of India And Ors, 1990 SCR (2) 861

[7] Public Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, (2004) 12 SCC 381

[8] Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India & Others, 1984 SCR (2) 67

[9] Budhadev Karmaskar vs State of West Bengal, 2011 (11) SCC 538

[10] Budhadev Karmaskar vs State of West Bengal, 2011 (11) SCC 538

[11] Gupta, Priya. "Socioeconomic Determinants of Prostitution: A Case Study of Red-Light Districts in India”, (2018)

[12] Smith, Jane. "Legal Regulation of Prostitution in India." (2019)

[13] Das, Arun. "Beyond Legislation: Addressing the Root Causes of Child Labor in India." Internationl Joural of Law and Human Rights, 32, (2019): 345-378

[14] M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1996 (6) SCC 756

[2] Rodolfo C. Severino, ASEAN and the World, in Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community 256–341 (2006).

[3] Keith E. Maskus, Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development, 32 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 471 (2000

[4] Edmund W. Sim, The Outsourcing of Legal Norms and Institutions by the ASEAN Economic Community, 1 Indon. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 314 (2014).

[5] Rodolfo C. Severino & Moe Thuzar, ASEAN Economic Cooperation and Its Political Realities, in Moving the AEC Beyond 2015: Managing Domestic Consensus for Community-Building 24–43 (Siew Yean Tham & Sanchita Basu Das eds., 2017)

[6] Chien-Huei Wu, ASEAN at the Crossroads: Trap and Track between CPTPP and RCEP, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 23, Issue 1, March 2020, Pages 97–117,

[7] Muhammad Rifky Wicaksono , Kusuma Raditya , Laurensia Andrini , Muhammad Hawin , Paripurna Sugarda, Herliana & Hariyanto, Implementing the Extraterritoriality Principle to Strengthen Competition Law Enforcement in Indonesia in the AEC Era: A Comparative Study, 9 Indon. L. Rev. 27 (2019)

[8] Mark McGillivray et al., Understanding the ASEAN Development Gap, in The 3rd ASEAN Reader 95–98 (2015).

[9] Paul Belleflamme, Martin Peitz, Intellectual Property, in Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies , 531–572

[10] Digital technologies, intellectual property and development, in Trade Governance in the Digital Age: World Trade Forum 365–454 (Mira Burri & Thomas Cottier eds., 2012).

[11] Keith E. Maskus, Teaching the economics of intellectual property rights in the global economy, in Teaching of Intellectual Property: Principles and Methods 166–184 (Yo Takagi, Larry Allman, & Mpazi A. Sinjela eds., 2008).

[12] Ching-Fu Lin, The Emergence of ASEAN Regional Food Safety Governance: Structure, Substance, and Context, 74 Food & Drug L.J. 80 (2019)

[13] Nguyen Khanh Doanh & Yoon Heo, Impacts of Intellectual Property Rights on Trade Flows in ASEAN Countries, 14 Journal of International and Area Studies 1–15 (2007).

[14] Steven D. Anderman, Intellectual property rights and competition law in smaller and medium sized open economies, in The Interface Between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy 313–314 (Steven D. Anderman ed., 2007).

[15] Ivan Morales, Balancing Intellectual Property Rights and Clean Technology Development: Encouraging Cooperation, 17 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol'y 405 (2017).

[16] David P. Schmidt, Intellectual Property Battles in a Technological Global Economy: A Just War Analysis, 14 Business Ethics Quarterly 679–693 (2004).

[18] Asean: e-ASEAN Framework Agreement, 40 International Legal Materials 515–521 (2001).

[19] Stefano Inama & Edmund W. Sim, Overview of ASEAN, in The Foundation of the ASEAN Economic Community: An Institutional and Legal Profile 19–35 (2015).

[20] Irene Calboli, The ASEAN Way or No Way: A Closer Look at the Absence of a Common Rule on Intellectual Property Exhaustion in ASEAN and the Impact on the ASEAN Market, 14 U. Pa. Asian L. Rev. 363 (2019).

[21] Pushpa Thambipillai, The ASEAN-10, in Regional Outlook: Southeast Asia 2011–2012 30–78 (2011).

[22] Sungjoon Cho & Jurgen Kurtz, Legalizing the ASEAN Way: Adapting and Reimagining the ASEAN Investment Regime, 66 Am. J. Comp. L. 233 (2018).

[23] Peter Cornelius, Corporate Practices and National Governance Systems: what Do Country Rankings Tell Us, 6 German L.J. 583 (2005).

[24] 2019 International Property Rights Index, Property Rights Alliance, https://www.internationalpropertyrightsindex.org/country/singapore.

[25] Singapore keeps top spot in Asia for IP protection, The Strait Times, (Oct. 19, 2019), https://www.straitstimes.com/business/economy/singapore-keeps-top-spot-in-asia-for-ip-protection.

[27] R.C. Dreyfuss and J. Pila, Oxford Handbook of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 1 No. 1, 362 (2018).

[28] Malaysian Intellectual Property Office, http://www.myipo.gov.my/en/about/#:~:text=ABOUT%20MyIPO&text=The%20Division%20was%20tasked%20to,Act%202000%20came%20into%20force.

[29] N.A. Mohamed Yusof, The State of Social Progress in Islamic Societies, Establishing Patent Standard: the Case of Biotechnology Invention in Malaysia, (Apr. 2016).

[30] C. Antons, Intellectual Property in ASEAN countries, European IP Review, Vol. 13 No. 3 (1991)

[31] M. Barthos and Rineke Sara, Dysfunctional IP Infringements and Ineffectiveness of Enforcement Mechanisms under Indonesian Laws, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, Vol. 22 No.1 (2019).

[33] N. Barizah, The Development of ASEAN’s Intellectual Property Rights Law; From Trips Compliance to Harmonization, Indonesia Law Review (2017), https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/62955-EN-the-development-of-aseans-intellectual-p.pdf.

[37] D. Sharma, Myanmar Passed Legislation to Protect Intellectual Property, Mondaq (Feb. 20, 2019), https://www.mondaq.com/trademark/782500/myanmar-passed-legislation-to-protect-intellectual-property.

[39] A. Sitkoff, IPR Protection and Enforcement in Vietnam is Not as Strong as it Should Be, Vietnam Law Magazine (May 2018), https://vietnamlawmagazine.vn/ipr-protection-and-enforcement-in-vietnam-is-not-as-strong-as-it-should-be-6217.html.

[41]Evan Garcia, Intellectual Property for Development: The ASEAN Story (Aug. 2017), https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/04/article_0006.html

[42]ASEAN Framework Agreement on Intellectual Property Cooperation, Bangkok, Thailand (Dec. 15, 1995), https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-framework-agreement-on-intellectual-property-cooperation-bangkok-thailand-15-december-1995.

[44] P. Fowler, T. Charoenpot and C. Chernkwamna, ASEAN and Intellectual Property: Will a Complicated History Lead to a Certain Future?, 40 Loy. L.A. Int’I &Comp. L. Rev. 167 (2017) http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol40/iss2/2

[45] C. Antons, Intellectual Property in ASEAN countries, European IP Review, Vol. 13 No. 3 (1991)

[46] IPR Enforcement in South-East Asia, South-East Asia IPR SME Helpdesk (2017), https://www.southeastasia-iprhelpdesk.eu/sites/default/files/publications/EN_Enforcement.pdf.

[52] Anthony De Andrade and V. Vishwanath, Patenting Costs in ASEAN: Upcoming Global Economic Powerhouse, IP Watchdog, (Apr. 17, 2017), https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/04/07/patenting-costs-asean-upcoming-global-economic-powerhouse/id=81695/; See also, Anthony De Andrade and V. Vishwanath, The Cost of Registering a Trademark in Southeast Asia, IP Watchdog, (Jan. 18, 2018), https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2018/01/18/cost-register-trademark-southeast-asia/id=92311/.

[53] N. Barizah, The Development of ASEAN’s Intellectual Property Rights Law; From Trips Compliance to Harmonization, Indonesia Law Review (2017), https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/62955-EN-the-development-of-aseans-intellectual-p.pdf.

[54] Steve Morrish, counterfeiting in Asia – You Make It, They Fake It, SCMS, (May 17, 2016), https://www.smcs-risk.com/counterfeiting-in-asia/

[56] A. Debray, Myanmar: Myanmar’s new Trademark Law, Mondaq, (Feb. 11, 2020), https://www.mondaq.com/trademark/892264/myanmar39s-new-trademark-law#:~:text=Myanmar%3A%20Myanmar's%20New%20Trademark%20Law&text=Myanmar%20already%20bears%20the%20brunt,ASEAN%20countries%20and%20international%20standards.

[58] ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, (1967)

[59] Intellectual Property Interoperability and the ASEAN Way, in International Intellectual Property and the ASEAN Way: Pathways to Interoperability 1–78 (Elizabeth Siew-Kuan Ng & Graeme W. Austin eds., 2017).

[60] International Intellectual Property and the ASEAN Way: Pathways to Interoperability, (Elizabeth Siew-Kuan Ng & Graeme W. Austin eds., 2017).

[61] Patent Cooperation Treaty, 9 International Legal Materials 978–1025 (1970).

[62] Kristina Jönsson, Authoritarian States in Southeast Asia in Times of Globalization: Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar, in Globalization and its Counter-Forces in Southeast Asia 21–50 (2008).

[63] Michael A. Witt, Corporate governance and initial public offerings in Singapore*, in Corporate Governance and Initial Public Offerings: An International Perspective 378–396 (Alessandro Zattoni & William Judge eds., 2012).

[64] Technology Transfer and Development in Asean: Machinery and Electronics Industries, in Technology and Skills in ASEAN: An Overview 97–118 (1988).

[65] Ashish Arora, Andrea Fosfuri & Alfonso Gambardella, Markets for Technology, Intellectual Property Rights, and Development, in International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime 321–336 (Keith E. Maskus & Jerome H. Reichman eds., 2005).

[66] Rodolfo C. Severino, Institutional Development in ASEAN, in ASEAN-Canada Forum 2008 55–62 (2010).

[67] Mahani Zainal Abidin & Firdaos Rosli, Infrastructure Development in ASEAN, in ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard: Performance and Perception 136–162 (2013).

[68] Bryan Mercurio, Intellectual Property Rights, Trade, and Economic Development, in Law and Development Perspective on International Trade Law 49–80 (Yong-Shik Lee et al. eds., 2011).

[69] Elizabeth Siew-Kuan Ng, ASEAN IP Harmonization: Striking the Delicate Balance, 25 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 129 (2013

[70] Sungjoon Cho & Jurgen Kurtz, Legalizing the ASEAN Way: Adapting and Reimagining the ASEAN Investment Regime, 66 Am. J. Comp. L. 233 (2018

[1] Galati, L. (2023, September 27). What Is Cyber Espionage? Understanding State Sponsored Cyber Attacks. Cyberteam. https://www.cyberteam.us/blog/what-is-cyber-espionage-understanding-state-sponsored-cyber-attacks

[2] Alvarez, J. (2015, February 3). Stuxnet: The world's first cyber weapon. Stanford.edu. https://cisac.fsi.stanford.edu/news/stuxnet

[3] Wolter, D. (n.d.). The UN Takes a Big Step Forward on Cybersecurity. Arms Control Association. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2013-09/un-takes-big-step-forward-cybersecurity

[4] (n.d.). The Budapest Convention (ETS No. 185) and its Protocols. Www.coe.int. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/the-budapest-convention

[5] (n.d.). 2015 United States–China Cybersecurity Agreement. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States%E2%80%93China_Cybersecurity_Agreement

[6] Rollins, J. W. (2015, October 16). U.S.–China Cyber Agreement. CRS INSIGHT. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/IN10376.pdf

[7] (2020, May 28). Understanding the EU's approach to cyber diplomacy and cyber defence. Think Tank. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI%282020%29651937

[8] Miadzvetskaya, Yuliya and Wessel, Ramses A., The Externalisation of the EU’s Cybersecurity Regime: The Cyber Diplomacy Toolbox (July 21, 2022). 7(1) European Papers 2022, University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 27/2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4199627

[9] (n.d.). Defending the networks The NATO Policy on Cyber Defence. NATO OTAN. https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2018/10/NATO-110608-CyberdefencePolicyExecSummary.pdf

[11] (n.d.). TALLINN Manual on the international law applicable to cyber warfare. Www.Penncerl.org. https://www.penncerl.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/6481-tallinn-manual-on-the-international-law-applicable.pdf

[12] Williams, J. (2020, December 15). What You Need to Know About the SolarWinds Supply-Chain Attack. Sans.org. https://www.sans.org/blog/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-solarwinds-supply-chain-attack/

[13] (n.d.). The SolarWinds Cyber-Attack: What You Need to Know. Centre for Internet Security. https://www.cisecurity.org/solarwinds

[14] V. (2023, November 27). Email breach chronicles: The NotPetya catastrophe - global havoc in 2017. Zoho.com. https://www.zoho.com/workplace/articles/workplace/articles/notpetya-cyberattack.html

[1] Lok Sabha, F. (2012). STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (2011-12) THE DIRECT TAXES CODE BILL, 2010 FORTY-NINTH REPORT LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI (Saka) 2 FORTY-NINTH REPORT STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (2011-2012) (FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA) THE DIRECT TAXES CODE BILL.

[6] Dr. Justice A.R. Lakshmanan, D.D. Basu, Shorter Constitution of India, 1683 (14^th Ed. 2009).

[7] Dr. Justice A.R. Lakshmanan, D.D. Basu, Shorter Constitution of India, 1683 (14^th Ed. 2009).

[8] Lok Sabha, F. (2012). STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (2011-12) THE DIRECT TAXES CODE BILL, 2010 FORTY-NINTH REPORT LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI (Saka) 2 FORTY-NINTH REPORT STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (2011-2012) (FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA) THE DIRECT TAXES CODE BILL.

[10] Vol. III, (New Delhi, India, 1953-54), 181-330.

[15] McDowell and Co. Ltd. v. CTO, (1985) 3 SCC 230 : AIR 1986 SC 649.

[16] See Nani Palkhivala et al., The Law and Practice of Income Tax 66 (9th Edn., Dinesh Vyas Ed., 2004)(hereinafter “Palkhivala”).

[17] Vodafone International Holdings v. Union of India, 2008 SCC OnLine Bom 1152 : (2009) 311 ITR 46.

[18] Rao, K. R. and Chakraborty, P. 2010. Goods and services tax in India : An Assessment

of the Base, Economic & Political Weekly, XLV (1), January 2.

[19] Rao, M., Rao, G. and Rao, K. R. 2009. Direct taxes code : Need for greater reflection,

Economic & Political Weekly, XLIV( 37), September

[20] Shetty, S.L. 2010. Mare tax concessions for more inequality, Economic & Political

Weekly, 2010 XLV (11).,March 1

[21] Shetty, S.L. 2010. Mare tax concessions for more inequality, Economic & Political

Weekly, 2010 XLV (11).,March 1

[22] Rao, M., Rao, G. and Rao, K. R. 2009. Direct taxes code : Need for greater reflection,

Economic & Political Weekly, XLIV( 37), September.

[23] The Indian Journal of Commerce Vol. 64, No. 2, April-June 2011.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN CORPORATE LAW: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSING PATENT AND TRADEMARK ISSUES. BY - REETAMBHAR KUMAR DAS

ADVANCEMENTS IN TECHNOLOGY AND THE DIGITAL AGE: INFLUENCES ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN CYBER CRIMES AND DIGITAL EVIDENCE CASES BY - TANYA ELIZABETH MATHEW

THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO LEGAL AID IN INDIA: AN ASSESSMENT BY - MIRZA ADEEB JIAN

“FREEDOM TO DO BUSINESS AND TRADE IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL PREROGATIVES AND JUDICIAL DYNAMISM” BY - DHILAN SARMA

HORIZONTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN INDIA – NEED AND CHALLENGES BY - ADARSH GOGOI

ONE PERSON COMPANY IN INDIA & ITS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM (U.K) BY: TAMANNA BANSAL

RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATION IN INDIA: EXPLAINED HORIZONTALLY BY - PRIYANSH KANAWAT

SETTING THE BLOCKS FOR ASEAN: HOW IP INJECTION CAN INCREASE THE FRUITFULNESS OF AEC AND ITS GOAL OF 2025 BY - ABHISHEK SHARMA, ANNANY MAMGAIN & ARYAN GARG

UNDERSTANDING CYBER ESPIONAGE AND STATE-SPONSORED ATTACKS BY - DEEPANSHI SRIVASTAVA

AN OVERVIEW OF DIRECT TAXES CODE BILL BY- AYUSH PATIDAR & SNEHA SHARMA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN CORPORATE LAW: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSING PATENT AND TRADEMARK ISSUES. BY - REETAMBHAR KUMAR DAS

ADVANCEMENTS IN TECHNOLOGY AND THE DIGITAL AGE: INFLUENCES ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN CYBER CRIMES AND DIGITAL EVIDENCE CASES BY - TANYA ELIZABETH MATHEW

THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO LEGAL AID IN INDIA: AN ASSESSMENT BY - MIRZA ADEEB JIAN

“FREEDOM TO DO BUSINESS AND TRADE IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL PREROGATIVES AND JUDICIAL DYNAMISM” BY - DHILAN SARMA

HORIZONTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN INDIA – NEED AND CHALLENGES BY - ADARSH GOGOI

ONE PERSON COMPANY IN INDIA & ITS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM (U.K) BY: TAMANNA BANSAL

RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATION IN INDIA: EXPLAINED HORIZONTALLY BY - PRIYANSH KANAWAT

SETTING THE BLOCKS FOR ASEAN: HOW IP INJECTION CAN INCREASE THE FRUITFULNESS OF AEC AND ITS GOAL OF 2025 BY - ABHISHEK SHARMA, ANNANY MAMGAIN & ARYAN GARG

UNDERSTANDING CYBER ESPIONAGE AND STATE-SPONSORED ATTACKS BY - DEEPANSHI SRIVASTAVA

AN OVERVIEW OF DIRECT TAXES CODE BILL BY- AYUSH PATIDAR & SNEHA SHARMA

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2