INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

ARBITRABILITY OF COPYRIGHT DISPUTES: BALANCING RIGHT IN REM AND RIGHT IN PERSONAM BY - AKHILA M S

Authors : AKHILA M S

Registration ID : 107027 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7027

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : akhila.ms@law.christuniversity.in

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

REVISITING THE PROCEDURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIA AND USA BY - ANMOL TANWAR

Authors : ANMOL TANWAR

Registration ID : 107026 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7026

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : anmolt0107@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

A STUDY ON CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF PRISON VIOLENCE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TAMILNADU BY - S ASWATH & MS. M. MANONMANI

Authors : S ASWATH & MS. M. MANONMANI

Registration ID : 107024 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7024 & IJLRA7025

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : aswathssl17@gmail.com & manonmanim.ssl@saveetha.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

THE SUFFOCATION OF ACID ATTACKS: THE TALE OF SCAR BY - TUSHAR ARYAN

Authors : TUSHAR ARYAN

Registration ID : 107023 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7023

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : harshllba.786@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

AN ANALYSIS ON PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER VARIOUS CONVENTIONS BY *PROF. DR. ANJINA REDDY K.R.

Authors : PROF. DR. ANJINA REDDY K.R.

Registration ID : 107022 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7022

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : dr.anjinareddykr@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

ANALYSIS OF INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY BY - ANISHA KUMARI

Authors : ANISHA KUMARI

Registration ID : 107021 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7021

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : advoanisha.kumari@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

SOCIAL MEDIA TRIALS: A THREAT TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM BY - ANISHA KUMARI

Authors : ANISHA KUMARI

Registration ID : 107020 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7020

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : advoanisha.kumari@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: BETWEEN THE RELATION OF INTERNATIONAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW. BY - ANISHA KUMARI

Authors : ANISHA KUMARI

Registration ID : 107019 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7019

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : advoanisha.kumari@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 BY - ANISHA KUMARI

Authors : ANISHA KUMARI

Registration ID : 107018 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7018

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : advoanisha.kumari@gmail.com

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

CHANGING PARADIGM OF COAL BLOCK ALLOCATION: A STEP TOWARDS COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM BY - SHIVAM AGRAWAL

Authors : SHIVAM AGRAWAL

Registration ID : 107017 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7017

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : 22shivamagrawal@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

[1] Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 1884 (signed 20 March 1983 and came into effect 7 July 1884) Art. 1 (2); Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1994 (concluded 15 April 1994, came into effect 1 January 1995) Art. 1 (2) and Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization, 1967 (signed 14 July 1967, came into effect 16 April 1970) Art. 2 (viii).

[2] Upendra Baxi, ‘Copyright Law and Justice in India’ (1986) 28 (4) JILI, 497, 505.

[5] Jatindra Kumar Das, Law of Copyright (2 PHI Learning Private Limited, Delhi, 2015) 1-15.

[6] Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1971 (came into effect on 9 September 1886).

[7] Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1995 (concluded 15 April 1994, came into effect 1 January 1995).

[8] P J Fitzgerald, Salmond on Jurisprudence, (12 Sweet & Maxwell, South Asian, 2021) 421-424.

[13]The Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act, 2004, 17 U.S.C ss. 801-803.

[14] Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, LLC, 139 S. Ct. 881.

[16] Italian Code of Civil Procedure, 1940, Art. 806.

[18] French Code of Civil Procedure, 1804, Art 2060.

[19] DELOS, Guide to arbitration places, available at: https://delosdr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Delos-GAP-2nd-edn-France.pdf (accessed 18 on October 2023).

[20] Pertaining to the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights, 2002.

[22] Promulgating the Law Concerning Arbitration in Civil and Commercial Matters, Law No. 27/1994.

[23]Islam Mohamed, Arbitrating Copyright Disputes in Egypt, available at: www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1105&context=etd (accessed 20 October 2023).

[24] Francois Dessemontet, “Dispute Resolution Proceedings in World Trade Organisation and International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparision” (2017) IJAL 174, 187.

[25] United States — s. 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, Recourse to Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU, WT/DS160/ARB25/1, §§ 2.1 - 2.7 (9-11-2001).

[26] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s. 2(3).

[27] Ajar Rab, ‘Defining the Contours of the public policy exception – a new test for arbitrability in India’, (2019) IJAL 161, 162.

[28] Kushagra Sharma, Shivangi Sinha, et.al, ‘Arbitrability of Intellectual Property Disputes in Indian Context’, (2023) (8) IJERT 12, 14.

[32] Vidhi K Tiwari and Suman Shetty, Eros International Media Limited v. Telemax Links India Private Limited – A step ahead, (2016) RSRR 65.

[34] Vidya Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation, (2021) 2 SCC 1.

[35] Tandav Films Entertainment Private Limited v. Four Frame Pictures and another, 2009 SCC OnLine Del 3930; Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums, (2003) 6 SCC 503; Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited v. Verma Transport Company, (2006) 7 SCC 275.

[36] Yashraj Samant & Chirag Balyan, Specialized Arbitration, (Thomson Reuters, Legal, India, 2021) 359-360.

[1] Gregory A. Caldeira, Constitutional Change in America: Dynamics of Ratification under Article V, 15 Publius 29 (1985).

[2]“D. D. Basu, Commentary on the Constitution of India (2012).”

[3]“Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).”

[4] Hugh Evander, The Doctrine of Amendability of the United States Constitution, 7 Indiana L. Rev. 457 (1932),

[5] William Marbury, The Limitations upon the Amending Power, 33 Harvard L. Rev. 225 (1919).

[6]“Shankari Prasad v. Union of India, AIR 1951 SC 458.”

[7]“Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, (1967) SCR 762.”

[8]“Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461.”

[10]“Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SCC 2299.”

[11]“George D. Skinner, Intrinsic Limitations on the Power of Constitutional Amendment, 18 Michigan L. Rev. 213 (1920).”

[12]“National Prohibition Cases, (1920) 253 US 350.”

[14] Erwin Chemerinsky, Amending the Constitution, 96 Michigan L. Rev. 1564 (1998).

[1]Human Rights Commission, https://www.humanrightscommission.ky/human-rights-treaties (last visited on: October 15, 2023)

[2] OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-and-mechanisms/international-human-rights-law (last visited on: October 15, 2023)

[3] NHRC, https://nhrc.nic.in/sites/default/files/A_Handbook_on_International_HR_Conventions.pdf (last visited on: October 15, 2023)

[4] It reads: "The Government of India declares that for reference of any dispute to the International Court of Justice for decision in terms of Article 22 of the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination, the consent of all parties to the dispute is necessary in each individual case."

[5] India’s Declarations/Reservations on the CEDAW

Declarations: "i) With regard to articles 5 (a) and 16 (1) of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Government of the Republic of India declares that it shall abide by and ensure these provisions in conformity with its policy of non-interference in the personal affairs of any Community without its initiative and consent.

ii) With regard to article 16 (2) of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Government of the Republic of India declares that though in principle it fully supports the principle of compulsory registration of marriages, it is not practical in a vast country like India with its variety of customs, religions and level of literacy."

Reservation: "With regard to article 29 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Government of the Republic of India declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of this article."

[7] Section 12(f) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (PHRA).

[9] NHRC, https://nhrc.nic.in/faqs/what-functions-have-been-assigned-commission-under-act-0 (last visited on: October 15, 2023)

[1] By – Shivam Agrawal, B.A.LL.B. (Hons.), Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur; LL.M., The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata.

[2] COAL – INDIAN ENERGY CHOICE, available at https://coal.nic.in/en/major-statistics/coal-indian-energy-choice (Last visited on October 25, 2022).

[3] Chengappa, M. M. (2017). The Move from Preferential License/Lease Regime to Competitive Bidding through Auction: An Examination of Law Relating to Coal Block Allocation in India. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 8(2), 46-58, 46.

[4] Ministry of Coal, Office Memorandum, No. 13011/3/92-CA (July 14, 1992).

[5] The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), Report No. 7 of 2012-13 – Performance Audit of Allocation of Coal Blocks and Augmentation of Coal Production, Ministry of Coal, 22, available at https://cag.gov.in/en/audit-report/details/1837 (Last visited on October 25, 2022).

[6] Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary, (2014) 9 SCC 516.

[7] The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Schedule I, Part A, Item 1.

[8] Arpita Asha Khanna, Governance in Coal Mining: Issues and Challenges, August 2013, 8-9, available at https://www.teriin.org/projects/nfa/2008-2013/pdf/nfa-WkP9-coal-governance.pdf (Last visited on October 25, 2022).

[9] See The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; and The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

[10] The Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, The Long Title.

[11] Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 [Repealed], available at https://www.scconline.com/Members/BrowseResult.aspx (Last visited on October 25, 2022).

[12] Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary, (2014) 9 SCC 516.

[13] The Auction by Competitive Bidding of Coal Mines Rules, 2012.

[14] The Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015, The Long Title.

[15] The Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015, Schedule IV, Part B, Item 1.

[16] See The Mineral Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020; and The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation)

Amendment Act, 2021.

[17] The Coal Blocks Allocation Rules, 2017, The Long Title.

[18] The Coal Blocks Allocation Rules, 2017, Rule 2(1) (k).

[19] See The Coal Blocks Allocation (Amendment) Rules, 2020.

[20] Baijnath Kadio v. State of Bihar, (1969) 3 SCC 838. See also Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orrissa, (1961) 2 SCR 537; State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch and Co., (1964) 4 SCR 461.

[21] Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd. v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 13 SCC 1.

[22] Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. v. Union of India, (2012) 11 SCC 1.

[23] Orissa Cement Ltd. v. State of Orissa, 1991 Supp. (1) SCC 430.

[24] Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. State of Bihar, (1990) 4 SCC 557.

[25] Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. v. Union of India, (2012) 11 SCC 1.

[26] Amritlal Nathubhai Shah v. Union of India, (1976) 4 SCC 108.

[29] Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India, (2012) 3 SCC 1.

[30] In Re: Special Reference No. 1 of 2012, (2012) 10 SCC 1.

[31] E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1974) 4 SCC 3.

[32] State of Tamil Nadu v. L. Abu Kavur Bai, (1984) 1 SCC 515.

[33] See M/s Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State of Jammu and Kashmir, (1980) 4 SCC 1; M.P. Oil Extraction v. State of M.P., (1997) 7 SCC 592 inter alia.

[34] The Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, §3(ae). It reads: “mineral concession” means either a reconnaissance permit, prospecting licence, mining lease, composite licence or a combination of any of these and the expression “concession” shall be construed accordingly.

[35] The Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, §3(a). It reads: “composite licence” means the prospecting licence-cum-mining lease which is a two stage concession granted for the purpose of undertaking prospecting operations followed by mining operations in a seamless manner.

[36] The Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, §11A.

[37] The Coal Blocks Allocation Rules, 2017, Rule 2(1) (c).

[38] Goa Foundation v. Union of India, (2014) 6 SCC 590.

[39] State of Orrisa v. Union of India, (2001) 1 SCC 429. See also Amritlal Nathubhai Shah v. Union of India, (1976) 4 SCC 108.

[40] Srikrishna, B. N. (2011). Beyond Federalism. India International Centre Quarterly, 38(3/4), 386–407, 407.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

ARBITRABILITY OF COPYRIGHT DISPUTES: BALANCING RIGHT IN REM AND RIGHT IN PERSONAM BY - AKHILA M S

REVISITING THE PROCEDURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIA AND USA BY - ANMOL TANWAR

A STUDY ON CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF PRISON VIOLENCE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TAMILNADU BY - S ASWATH & MS. M. MANONMANI

THE SUFFOCATION OF ACID ATTACKS: THE TALE OF SCAR BY - TUSHAR ARYAN

AN ANALYSIS ON PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER VARIOUS CONVENTIONS BY *PROF. DR. ANJINA REDDY K.R.

ANALYSIS OF INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY BY - ANISHA KUMARI

SOCIAL MEDIA TRIALS: A THREAT TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM BY - ANISHA KUMARI

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: BETWEEN THE RELATION OF INTERNATIONAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW. BY - ANISHA KUMARI

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 BY - ANISHA KUMARI

CHANGING PARADIGM OF COAL BLOCK ALLOCATION: A STEP TOWARDS COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM BY - SHIVAM AGRAWAL

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

ARBITRABILITY OF COPYRIGHT DISPUTES: BALANCING RIGHT IN REM AND RIGHT IN PERSONAM BY - AKHILA M S

REVISITING THE PROCEDURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIA AND USA BY - ANMOL TANWAR

A STUDY ON CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF PRISON VIOLENCE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TAMILNADU BY - S ASWATH & MS. M. MANONMANI

THE SUFFOCATION OF ACID ATTACKS: THE TALE OF SCAR BY - TUSHAR ARYAN

AN ANALYSIS ON PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER VARIOUS CONVENTIONS BY *PROF. DR. ANJINA REDDY K.R.

ANALYSIS OF INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY BY - ANISHA KUMARI

SOCIAL MEDIA TRIALS: A THREAT TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM BY - ANISHA KUMARI

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: BETWEEN THE RELATION OF INTERNATIONAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW. BY - ANISHA KUMARI

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 BY - ANISHA KUMARI

CHANGING PARADIGM OF COAL BLOCK ALLOCATION: A STEP TOWARDS COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM BY - SHIVAM AGRAWAL

Citation

Citation

[12]“National Prohibition Cases, (1920) 253 US 350.”

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2