CORPORATE TAX DISPARITIES IN INDIA: CAUSES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TAX POLICY BY: SHIVAM GUPTA

Authors : SHIVAM GUPTA

Registration ID : 106422 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6422

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : sg02122002@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

SEPARATION OF POWER – STRESS AND STRAIN BY - KRITIK ROSHAN RV & SABARI RAJAN

Authors : KRITIK ROSHAN RV & SABARI RAJAN

Registration ID : 106420 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6420 & IJLRA6421

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : kritikroshan369@gmail.com & kritik_8773@outlook.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

THE JOURNEY OF ELECTION COMMISSION, FROM 1950 TO 2023, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CASE OF TN SHESHAN. BY - RISHAB. D. GOLANI & PUJITA AGARWAL

Authors : RISHAB. D. GOLANI & PUJITA AGARWAL

Registration ID : 106418 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6418 & IJLRA6419

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : rishabgolani05@gmail.com & pujita2005@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

ISSUES AND CHALLENGES OF GENDER EQUALITY IN TRIBAL SOCIETY BY - KAILAS P. VASAVE

Authors : KAILAS P. VASAVE

Registration ID : 106417 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6417

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : kailasvasavep@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

‘DISPARITY IN SENTENCING PROCESS’ BY – GHANISHTHA SHRIVASTAVA

Authors : GHANISHTHA SHRIVASTAVA

Registration ID : 106416 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6416

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ghanishthashri133@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

THE THEORY OF CRIMES IN THE LIGHT OF RETRIBUTIVE THEORY AND SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY OF CRIMES CONCERNING VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF CHILDREN BY - KAJAL PRIYA

Authors : KAJAL PRIYA

Registration ID : 106415 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6415

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : rrskajal@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

DIFFERENTIAL VOTING RIGHTS: THE UNDERLYING LINK BETWEEN ACQUISITIONS AND TAKEOVERS, MANAGERIAL CONTROL, AND OPPRESSION OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS BY - BHAKTI MAKHIJA

Authors : BHAKTI MAKHIJA

Registration ID : 106414 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6414

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : bhaktimakhija18@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

IS THERE A BALANCE BETWEEN MINORITY RIGHTS AND MAJORITY GOVERNANCE UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT OF 2013? BY - DIYA KULARNI, DIMPLE ASWANI & SRIKARA BADARI YS

Authors : DIYA KULARNI, DIMPLE ASWANI & SRIKARA BADARI YS

Registration ID : 106411 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6411, IJLRA6412 & IJLRA6413

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : diyakulkarny@gmail.com, dimpleaswani04@gmail.com & srikara30@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

CHINA’S INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT: A FLAWED SYSTEM FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - RIJUL SETH

Authors : RIJUL SETH

Registration ID : 106410 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6410

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : 20jgls-rseth@jgu.edu.in

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF SECTION 65B: ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE BY - SAMRUDDHI VARMA

Authors : SAMRUDDHI VARMA

Registration ID : 106409 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6409

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : varmasam02@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

[1] India Stat, http://www.indiastat.com (last visited May 23, 2023)

[2] The Navhind Times (2011), “DTC to come into force from April 2012”, The Navhind Times, 9 December.

[3] International Monetary Fund, https://www.imf.org/Publications/fandd/issues/2020/12/what-is-the-informal-economy-basics (Last Visited May 23, 2023).

[4] GST officers detect Rs 7,421 crore tax evasion in April-June; recover Rs 1,920 crore, The Economic Times, (May 23, 2023, 05:56 PM), https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/gst-officers-detect-rs-7421-crore-tax-evasion-in-april-june-recover-rs-1920-crore/articleshow/85004716.cms?from=mdr.

[5] Revenue foregone to corporates estimated at Rs 99,842.06 cr in 2019-20, The Economic Times, (May 22, 2023, 02:55 PM), https://m.economictimes.com/markets/stocks/news/revenue-foregone-to-corporates-estimated-at-rs-99842-06-cr-in-2019-20/articleshow/80634746.cms.

[6] Comptroller & Auditor General of India’s Performance Report, Government of India (2005/2006).

[7] Business Standard (2013), “India’s tax-GDP ratio one of the lowest”, Business Standard, 26 March.

[3] De l'esprit des lois (The Spirit of Law), January 1, 1748, Montesquieu.

[6] Constituent Assembly Debates Book No.2, Vol. No. VII Second Print 1989, p. 959.

[16] The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By ... vs K. Balu & Anr CIVIL APPEAL Nos .12164-12166.

[19] Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr. (Writ Petition (Civil) 135 of 1970).

[20] https://www.britannica.com/topic/judicial-review.

[21]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kesavananda_Bharati_v._State_of_Kerala#:~:text=Kesavananda%20Bharati%20Sripadagalvaru%20%26%20Ors.,doctrine%20of%20the%20Indian%20Constitution.

[22] https://www.desikanoon.co.in/2021/10/the-curious-case-of-casus-omissus.html.

[23] Article 142. Enforcement of decrees and orders of Supreme Court and orders as to discovery, etc.

[24]Meaning:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kritarchy#:~:text=Kritarchy%2C%20also%20called%20kritocracy%2C%20was,a%20united%20monarchy%20under%20Saul.

[25] Article (2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal 2 [on the recommendation of the National Judicial Appointments Commission referred to in article 124A] and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years: 3 [* * * * *] 4 [Provided that]— (a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office; (b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4).

[26] https://vajiramandravi.com/quest-upsc-notes/judicial-activism-and-overreach/.

[28]Article 142. Enforcement of decrees and orders of Supreme Court and orders as to discovery, etc.

[2] S.S. Dhanoa v Union of India, [1991], Supreme Court of India, 1991 AIR 1745, 1991 SCR (3) 159.

[3] Mr. Ashwini Chawla, A Critical Study of the Position of the CEC in the Light of Cases Such as SS Dhanoa V. Union Of India and TN Seshan V. Union Of India, Sept 6, 2004, A Critical Study of the Position of the CEC in the Light of Cases Such as SS Dhanoa V. Union Of India and TN Seshan V. Union Of India (manupatra.com) accessed 1^st November 2023.

[4] The Constitution (Sixty-First Amendment) Act, 1989.

[5] Report of the Committee on Electoral Reforms (Tarkunde Committee), Citizens for Democracy, (1975)

[6] Ministry of Law and Justice, Committee on Electoral Reforms, Report of the Committee on Electoral Reforms, May 1990.

[7] The Constitution (Seventy-Third Amendment) Act, 1992.

[8] The Constitution (Seventy- Fourth Amendment) Act, 1992.

[9] Constitutional Assembly Debates Vol. VIII (1949).

article66485421.ece, accessed 31^st October 2023.

[12] Janhit Abhiyan v Union of India, [2022], Supreme Court of India, (2023) 5 SCC 1; 2022 SCC Online SC 1540, (India).

[13] The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019.

[14] Anoop Baranwal v Union of India, [2023], Supreme Court of India, (2023) 6 SCC 161, (India).

[15] Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee: Motion of Confidence 28^th May 1996, Parliament of India, Digital Library, https://eparlib.nic.in/handle/123456789/809245?view_type=browse, accessed 1^st November 2023.

[1] Veena Bhasin, “Status of Tribal Women in India”, STUDIES ON HOME AND COMMUNITY SCIENCE, 1:1, 1-16, DOI: 10.1080/09737189.2007.11885234 (Visited on October 9, 2022)

[2] Kamal Misra and Jenet Lowry (eds.), RECENT STUDIES ON INDIAN WOMEN, 1st ed. 2007, p. 64

[3] J.J. Roy Burman, “Status of Tribal Women in India”, MAINSTREAM, Vol. No 12, 13 March 2012 https://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article3314.(Visited on October 9, 2022)

[5] Bala SM, Thiruselvakumar D. Overcoming problems in the practice of public health among tribals of India. INDIAN J COMMUNITY MED. 2009 Oct;34(4):283-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.58383. PMID: 20165618; PMCID: PMC2822185. (Visited on October 9, 2022)

[2] Damayanti Bhattacharjee, ‘Disparity in sentencing policy in India’ Vol 3 Issue 4 INTERNATION JOURNAL OF LAW MANAGEMENT AND HUMANITIES, pg. 1108 – 1110 (2020).

[3] Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of W.B., (2004) 9 SCC 751.

[4] Santosh Kumar Singh vs. State Through CBI, 2007 CriLJ 964, 133 (2006) DLT 393.

[8] Hussainara Khatoon (I) v. Home Secy., State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 81.

[9] Tuka Ram vs. State of Maharashtra, 979 AIR 185 1979 SCR (1) 810 1979 SCC (2) 143 ACT.

[12] Julian C. Jr. D’Esposito, ‘Sentencing Disparity Causes and cures’ vol. 60 issue 2, JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (1969).

[15] S.P. Sathe, Economic and Political Weekly Jayalalitha and crisis management, Vol. 36, JSTOR, pp. 3659-3662 (Sep 2001).

[17] P. Chidambaram v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 13340.

[19] Sidharth Vashisht v. State NCT of Delhi. AIR 2010 SC 2352.

[1] HENRY CAMPBELL, BLACK LAW’S DICTIONARY, 4th Ed.-29, 1968.

[3] Thomas B.Marvell, Carlisle E. Moddy, 7,Age Structure and crime rates: The conflicting Evidence, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY (1991).

[4] THOM BROOKS, PUNISHMENT 20 (1st, Taylor & Francis, 2012).

[6] Karl Thompson, Labelling Theory of Crime, REVISE SOCILOGY, November 17, 2021. https://revisesociology.com/2016/08/20/labelling-theory-crime-deviance/

[7] HOWARD BECKER, OUTSIDERS: STUDIES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF DEVIANCE, (New York free Press, 1963).

[9] (592/1994), ICCPR, A/54/40 vol. II (20 October 1998).

[10] 90/1997/874/1086, Judgment of 28 October 1998.

[11] No. 60958/00, Judgment of 30 September 2003.

[12] Judgment of Sept. 18, 2003, (Ser. C) No. 100 (2008)

[13] Judgment of September 2, 2012, (Ser. C) No. 112.

[19] Charles A. Ellwood, Classification of Criminals, 1, JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL AND CRIMINOLOGY, 536-548 (1911).

[21] HALSBURY LAW OF ENGLAND, 482 (4^th Edition: Vol.II, 2013).

^{^[1]} ‘The New York Times Company’ (The New York Times, 30 April 2012) https://archive.nytimes.com/dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/04/ accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[2]}(Harvard Business Law Review (HBLR)) https://journals.law.harvard.edu/hblr/ accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[3]}(Corporate control, dual class, and the limits of judicial review - jstor) https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915804 accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[4]} (Corporate control, dual class, and the limits of judicial review - jstor) https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915804 accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[6]}(Corporate control, dual class, and the limits of judicial review - jstor) https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915804 accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[7]}(Corporate control, dual class, and the limits of judicial review - jstor) https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915804 accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[8]}(Corporate control, dual class, and the limits of judicial review - jstor) https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915804 accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[9]} (Corporate control, dual class, and the limits of judicial review - jstor) https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915804 accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[13]} (Jenkins Committee on company law - JSTOR) https://www.jstor.org/stable/41139654 accessed 31 October 2023

[15] Elder v. Elder & Watson Ltd.,1952 S.C. 49,57

[16] Rubner A, The Ensnared Shareholder: Directors and the Modern Corporation (Penguin 1966)

^{^[20]} ‘In Facebook Deal for Instagram, Board Was All but out of Picture’ (The Wall Street Journal, 29 October 2012) https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304818404577350191931921290\> accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[21]} ‘In Facebook Deal for Instagram, Board Was All but out of Picture’ (The Wall Street Journal, 29 October 2012) https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304818404577350191931921290 accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[22]} ‘In Facebook Deal for Instagram, Board Was All but out of Picture’ (The Wall Street Journal, 29 October 2012) https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304818404577350191931921290\ accessed 31 October 2023

^{^[3]} MacDougall v. Gardiner (1875) 1 CHD 13 CA. See also Burland v. Earle (1902) AC 83, P.C

[5] Mike Oluwaseyi Bamigboye, The True Exception to the Rule in Foss v. Harbottle: Statutory Derivative Action Revisited, Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2863851 (Visited on 30 Jan 2020)

^{^[6]}Menier v. Hooper’s Telegraph Words (1874) LR 9 CH APP 350.

^{^[8]} Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.v Tata Sons Ltd. & Ors MANU/NL/0640/2019 (India).

^{^[9]} Bailly v. oriented telephone Company Ltd. (1915) 1 CH 503 CA.

[10] Sh. Kanhiya Lal vs Sh. Bharat Bhushan on 16 May, 2015

[11] Sandvik Asia Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, ... on 27 January, 2006

[1] Michael Stash, 'The New Silk Road: The Chinese Supreme People's Court's "International Commercial Court" and Opportunities for Alternative Dispute Resolution' (2019) 35 Ohio St J on Disp Resol 109.

[3] Chaisse J and Qian X, “Conservative Innovation: The Ambiguities of the China International Commercial Court” (2021) 115 AJIL Unbound 17.

[4] A Brief Introduction of China International Commercial Court, China International Commercial Court (June 28, 2018) http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/193/195/index.html.

[6] 4 Matthew S. Erie, The China International Commercial Court. Prospects for Dispute Resolution for the "Belt and Road Initiative," 22 AM. SOC'Y INT'L L. INSIGHTS 11 (2018), https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/22/issue/11.

[7] Michael Stash, 'The New Silk Road: The Chinese Supreme People's Court's "International Commercial Court" and Opportunities for Alternative Dispute Resolution' (2019) 35 Ohio St J on Disp Resol 109

[8] WEI LUO, THE CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW AND COURT RULES OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA 41 (2006).

[9] WEI LUO, THE CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW AND COURT RULES OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA 41 (2006).

[10] Civil Procedure Law (2017 Amendment) (adopted by the Standing Committee of National People’s Congress, 27 June 2017; effective on 1 July 2013) arts 17–20 http://lawinfochina.com/display.aspx?id=23601&lib=law&SearchKeyword=Civil%20Procedure%20Law&SearchCKeyword=.

[12] Huo Z and Yip M, “COMPARING THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURTS OF CHINA WITH THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT” (2019) 68 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 903

[13] Chaisse J and Qian X, “Conservative Innovation: The Ambiguities of the China International Commercial Court” (2021) 115 AJIL Unbound 17

[14] Chaisse J and Qian X, “Conservative Innovation: The Ambiguities of the China International Commercial Court” (2021) 115 AJIL Unbound 17

[16]. Luo Dongchuan, Consultation, Cooperation and Common Development- keynote speech at the First Seminar of the International Commercial Expert Committee. http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/199/203/1063.html.

[17] Chaisse J and Qian X, “Conservative Innovation: The Ambiguities of the China International Commercial Court” (2021) 115 AJIL Unbound 17

[21] Huo Z and Yip M, “COMPARING THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURTS OF CHINA WITH THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT” (2019) 68 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 903.

[22] Zhengxin Huo & Man Yip, 'Comparing the International Commercial Courts of China with the Singapore International Commercial Court' (2019) 68 Int'l & Comp LQ 903

[23] The State Council Information Office held a press conference on the Opinion on the Establishment of “The Belt and Road” International Commercial Dispute Settlement Mechanism and Institutions’ (China International Commercial Court, 28 June 2018) <http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/208/210/769.html>.

[26] Article 10, Civil Procedure Law (2017 Amendment) (adopted by the Standing Committee of National People’s Congress, 27 June 2017; effective on 1 July 2013) arts 17–20.; Article 11, Law of the People's Republic of China on the Organization of the People's Courts (2006 Amendment) (promulgated by the Standing Committee of National People's Congress, 31 October 2006)

[1] A.VENKATESWARA RAO, ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE, (2020), https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/sites/default/files/Webinar%20on%20Admissibility%20of%20Electronic%20Evidence%20By%20Sri%20A%20Venkateshwara%20Rao.pdf (last visited Oct 4, 2022).

[6] The Court overruled the Madras High Court’s decision in K. Ramajyam v. Inspector of Police (2016) Crl. LJ 1542, in this regard.

[8] Order XVI Rules 6, 7 and 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

[9] Ravinder Singh Kaku vs State of Punjab (2022) 5 SCC 461

[10] Prerita Aggarwal & Kamal Taneja, Relevancy and admissibility of evidence, 10 VIDHIGYA: The Journal of Legal Awareness 40 (2015).

[12] G. V. Nath, Evidence relating to electronic record - challenges in admissibility, SSRN Electronic Journal (2017).

[13] D. Yadav, M. Mishra and S. Prakash, "Mobile Forensics Challenges and Admissibility of Electronic Evidences in India," (2013) 5th International Conference and Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, 2013, pp. 237-242, doi: 10.1109/CICN.2013.57.

[14] Soni Lavin Valecha & Sonika Bharadwaj, 4 Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 15–20 (2020).

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

CORPORATE TAX DISPARITIES IN INDIA: CAUSES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TAX POLICY BY: SHIVAM GUPTA

SEPARATION OF POWER – STRESS AND STRAIN BY - KRITIK ROSHAN RV & SABARI RAJAN

THE JOURNEY OF ELECTION COMMISSION, FROM 1950 TO 2023, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CASE OF TN SHESHAN. BY - RISHAB. D. GOLANI & PUJITA AGARWAL

ISSUES AND CHALLENGES OF GENDER EQUALITY IN TRIBAL SOCIETY BY - KAILAS P. VASAVE

‘DISPARITY IN SENTENCING PROCESS’ BY – GHANISHTHA SHRIVASTAVA

THE THEORY OF CRIMES IN THE LIGHT OF RETRIBUTIVE THEORY AND SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY OF CRIMES CONCERNING VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF CHILDREN BY - KAJAL PRIYA

DIFFERENTIAL VOTING RIGHTS: THE UNDERLYING LINK BETWEEN ACQUISITIONS AND TAKEOVERS, MANAGERIAL CONTROL, AND OPPRESSION OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS BY - BHAKTI MAKHIJA

IS THERE A BALANCE BETWEEN MINORITY RIGHTS AND MAJORITY GOVERNANCE UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT OF 2013? BY - DIYA KULARNI, DIMPLE ASWANI & SRIKARA BADARI YS

CHINA’S INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT: A FLAWED SYSTEM FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - RIJUL SETH

A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF SECTION 65B: ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE BY - SAMRUDDHI VARMA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

CORPORATE TAX DISPARITIES IN INDIA: CAUSES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TAX POLICY BY: SHIVAM GUPTA

SEPARATION OF POWER – STRESS AND STRAIN BY - KRITIK ROSHAN RV & SABARI RAJAN

THE JOURNEY OF ELECTION COMMISSION, FROM 1950 TO 2023, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CASE OF TN SHESHAN. BY - RISHAB. D. GOLANI & PUJITA AGARWAL

ISSUES AND CHALLENGES OF GENDER EQUALITY IN TRIBAL SOCIETY BY - KAILAS P. VASAVE

‘DISPARITY IN SENTENCING PROCESS’ BY – GHANISHTHA SHRIVASTAVA

THE THEORY OF CRIMES IN THE LIGHT OF RETRIBUTIVE THEORY AND SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY OF CRIMES CONCERNING VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF CHILDREN BY - KAJAL PRIYA

DIFFERENTIAL VOTING RIGHTS: THE UNDERLYING LINK BETWEEN ACQUISITIONS AND TAKEOVERS, MANAGERIAL CONTROL, AND OPPRESSION OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS BY - BHAKTI MAKHIJA

IS THERE A BALANCE BETWEEN MINORITY RIGHTS AND MAJORITY GOVERNANCE UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT OF 2013? BY - DIYA KULARNI, DIMPLE ASWANI & SRIKARA BADARI YS

CHINA’S INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT: A FLAWED SYSTEM FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - RIJUL SETH

A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF SECTION 65B: ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE BY - SAMRUDDHI VARMA

Citation

Citation

Citation

[10]The Hindu, DATA-30 crore missing voters in India: Mostly young, urban or migrants, February 11, 2023, https://www.thehindu.com/data/data-30-crore-missing-voters-in-india-mostly-young-urban-or-migrants/article66485421.ece, accessed 31st October 2023.

[11] DATA-30 crore missing voters in India: Mostly young, urban or migrants, February 11, 2023, https://www.thehindu.com/data/data-30-crore-missing-voters-in-india-mostly-young-urban-or-migrants/article66485421.ece, accessed 31st October 2023.

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2

[10]The Hindu, DATA-30 crore missing voters in India: Mostly young, urban or migrants, February 11, 2023, https://www.thehindu.com/data/data-30-crore-missing-voters-in-india-mostly-young-urban-or-migrants/article66485421.ece, accessed 31^st October 2023.

[11] DATA-30 crore missing voters in India: Mostly young, urban or migrants, February 11, 2023, https://www.thehindu.com/data/data-30-crore-missing-voters-in-india-mostly-young-urban-or-migrants/article66485421.ece, accessed 31^st October 2023.