INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE ROLE OF INTERPRETATION IN SOCIAL CHANGE: DECRIMINALISATION OF SECTION 377 IPC BY - VIDHI SANTOSH RANE

Authors: VIDHI SANTOSH RANE

Registration ID: 105822 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5822

Year : July -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vidhi8870@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

ARTICLE 103, UN CHARTER: ITS MANDATE AND OPERATION BY: VIDHI SANTOSH RANE

Authors: VIDHI SANTOSH RANE

Registration ID: 105821 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5821

Year : July -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vidhi8870@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

RIGHT AND REALITY BEHIND THE BAR: A LEGAL ANALYSIS BY - VRINDA JOSHI & PRAYAG SANGWAN

Authors: VRINDA JOSHI & PRAYAG SANGWAN

Registration ID: 105819 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5819 & IJLRA5820

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vrinda.joshi@law.christuniversity.in & prayag.sangwan@law.christuniversity.in

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

“ANALYSIS OF THE INTRICATE INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SACROSANCT REALM OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ESTEEMED DOMAIN OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS” BY - BAHITRA BASU & SHRI DHARSHAN R.V

Authors: BAHITRA BASU & SHRI DHARSHAN R.V

Registration ID: 105817 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5817 & IJLRA5818

Year : July -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: basubahitra@gmail.com & venkateshdharshan3839@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

DILEMMA OF OWNERSHIP OVER AI GENERATED ARTWORKS: AN IP OVERVIEW BY – ATUL BHATT, TUSHMI UDYALAK & SUHASINI

Authors: ATUL BHATT, TUSHMI UDYALAK & SUHASINI

Registration ID: 105814 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5814, IJLRA5815 & IJLRA5816

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: manasvitaprasad@gmail.com & priyanshu2219raj@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

COMMERCIAL AND CORPORATE LAW CONSIDERATIONS IN THE AGE OF FINTECH: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS BY - ANJALY ANN JOSEPH, PARVATI & ANNA MARIA JOSEPH

Authors: ANJALY ANN JOSEPH, PARVATI & ANNA MARIA JOSEPH

Registration ID: 105811 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5811, IJLRA5812 & IJLRA5813

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: karunroy11@gmail.com

Page No :12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

ABORTION AND ITS DIMENSIONS BY - MANASVITA PRASAD AND PRIYANSHU RAJ

Authors: MANASVITA PRASAD AND PRIYANSHU RAJ

Registration ID: 105809 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5809 & IJLRA5810

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: manasvitaprasad@gmail.com & priyanshu2219raj@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

LEGAL CHALLENGES AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN FANTASY LEAGUE GAMES BY - VANSH DUA

Authors: VANSH DUA

Registration ID: 105808 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5808

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: 19jgls-vansh.d@jgu.edu.in

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF WHISTLE BLOWER BY - DR. VAISHALI THAKUR & MS. SUMANPREET KAUR

Authors: VAISHALI THAKUR & MS. SUMANPREET KAUR

Registration ID: 105806 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5806 & IJLRA5807

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sumanpreetlaw@gmail.com & vaishali.shalloo@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

AN EXTENSIVE STUDY OF RAPE LAWS IN INDIA AND SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BY- ANISHA BHAGAT & OM RAJ ANKIT

Authors: ANISHA BHAGAT & OM RAJ ANKIT

Registration ID: 105804 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5804 & IJLRA5805

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: anishabhagat7740@gmail.com & omrajankit@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-15798239/AN EXTENSIVE STUDY

^[1] Article 377- Indian Kanoon. (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1836974/

^[2] Journal of the Indian Law Institute - JSTOR. (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43950868

^[3]Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1

^[4] Suresh Kumar Koushal and Anr. v. Naz Foundation and Ors., (2014) 1 SCC 1

^[5] Reference- The quality of mercy, strained: Compassion, empathy and other ... (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2023, from http://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/8E21EC86-94D8-436A-8EBE-3BE1A56D261C.pdf

^[6] Angels, Bhardwaj, A., Pattnaik, P., & Shamsuddin. (2019, March 16). Suresh Kumar Kaushal vs. Naz Foundation: A critical analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/suresh-kumar-koushal-vs-naz-foundation-critical-analysis/

^[9] Malpas, J. (2022, August 22). Hans-Georg Gadamer. Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gadamer/

^[10] Able to identify as Comparative Constitutional analysis through Choudhry, S. (2010, June 14). Globalization in search of justification: Toward a theory of comparative constitutional interpretation. Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1624070

^[11]The analysis of the judgement was done through the official documents of the case andLearning from Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation through Introspection, Inclusion, and Intersectionality: Suggestions from within Indian Queer Justice Movements. (n.d.). Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Welcome

^[12] Galanter, M., & Ram, V. (n.d.). Suo motu intervention and the Indian Judiciary (Chapter 4) - A qualified hope. Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/qualified-hope/suo-motu-intervention-and-the-indian-judiciary/F1B7C8F9D4293703D56B061560C630D0

^[14] Saxena, N. (2013, December 15). Demystifying the naz verdict: Where did the courts go wrong? Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://lawlex.org/lex-pedia/demystifying-the-naz-verdict-where-did-the-courts-go-wrong/8833

^[15] Analysis of the judgement was made through the official case documents and Koushal v. Naz Foundation. (2021, July 06). Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/koushal-v-naz-foundation/

^[16] Maxwell, P., & Langan, P. (1969, January 01). Maxwell on the interpretation of statutes. /: Sir Peter Benson Maxwell. Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/57688

^[17] Importance of Statutorty Interpretation was skulled out through a joint reading of various articles in the course manual including Statutory interpretation as practical reasoning - Yale university. (n.d.). Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3829/

^[18] Reference- Saxena, N. (2013, December 15). Demystifying the naz verdict: Where did the courts go wrong? Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://lawlex.org/lex-pedia/demystifying-the-naz-verdict-where-did-the-courts-go-wrong/8833

^[19] Analysis of the judgement was made through the official case documents and Koushal v. Naz Foundation. (2021, July 06). Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/koushal-v-naz-foundation /

^[20] Content by author. (n.d.). Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/author/rishika-sahgal/

^[21] Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India - International Journal of Law ... (n.d.). Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://www.ijlmh.com/paper/navtej-singh-johar-v-union-of-india/

^[25] Choudhry, S. (2010, June 14). Globalization in search of justification: Toward a theory of comparative constitutional interpretation. Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1624070

^[26] The entire judgement analysis is done through looking at the official case documents and from Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India. (2018, November 27). Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/navtej-singh-johar-v-union-india/ and Ambade, A. (2020, July 23). Case summary: Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India Thr. secretary ministry of law and justice. Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://lawlex.org/lex-bulletin/case-summary-navtej-singh-johar-v-union-of-india-thr-secretary-ministry-of-law-and-justice/25100

^[28] Wendell Phillips quote. (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://www.azquotes.com/quote/1237224?ref=statutes

^[29] Justice Indu Malhotra in Navtej Singh Johar vs. UOI

^[31] Morrison, A. (2012, October 06). The law is a fractal: The attempt to anticipate everything. Retrieved April 6, 2023, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2157804

^{^[1]} “The United Nations Charter- Article 103” (United Nations) accessed October 10, 2022

^[2] Fassbender B, “The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community” (BrillApril 7, 2009) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[3]} “Westphalian Sovereignty” (WikipediaAugust 25, 2022) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[4]} Reference- “The United Nations and State Sovereignty: Mechanism for Managing International Security” (Taylor & Francis) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[5]} Kelsen H, “Conflicts between Obligations under the Charter of the United Nations and Obligations under Other International Agreements - An Analysis of Article 103 of the Charter (Page- 284-285)” (Redirecting...) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[6]} Kelsen H, “Conflicts between Obligations under the Charter of the United Nations and Obligations under Other International Agreements - An Analysis of Article 103 of the Charter (Page- 284-285)” (Redirecting...) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[7]} “The Scope of the Supremacy Clause of the United Nations Charter - JSTOR” accessed October 10, 2022

^[8] United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, “R (On the Application of Al-Jedda) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Defence (Respondent) [2007] UKHL 58” (Refworld) accessed October 10, 2022

^[9] “UNSCR Search Engine for the United Nations Security Council Resolutions” (UNSCR) accessed October 10, 2022

^[10] “European Convention on Human Rights - European Court of Human Rights” accessed October 10, 2022

^[11] Echr, “Al Jeeda vs UK” (HUDOC) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[12]} Gaja G, “The Protection of General Interests in the International Community General Course on Public International Law (2011) (Volume 364)” (BrillAugust 1, 2013) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[13]} Gaja G, “The Protection of General Interests in the International Community General Course on Public International Law (2011) (Volume 364)” (BrillAugust 1, 2013) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[14]} (Academic.oup.com) accessed October 10, 2022

^[15] Wallace RMM, “International Law” (Google Books) accessed October 10, 2022

^[16] Ejil, “Articles” (EJIL) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[17]} Perez AF, “The Perils of Pinochet: Problems for Transnational Justice and a Supranational Governance Solution” (Catholic Law Scholarship Repository) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[18]} Watson GR, “Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and the World Court” (Catholic Law Scholarship Repository) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[19]} Paust JJ, “Peace-Making and Security Council Powers: Bosnia-Herzegovina Raises International and Constitutional Questions” (SSRNJune 20, 2014) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[20]} “The Scope of the Supremacy Clause of the United Nations Charter - JSTOR” accessed October 10, 2022

^[21] Dupuy P-M, “The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited” (BrillJanuary 1, 1997) accessed October 10, 2022

^[22]Abi-Saab G, “Ordre Juridique International” (Google BooksMarch 16, 2001) accessed October 10, 2022

^[23] “NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects” (Academic.oup.com) accessed October 10, 2022

^[24] Wessendorf N, “The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary” (Google BooksNovember 22, 2012) accessed October 10, 2022

^[25] Leiæ JR and Paulus A, “Ch.XVI Miscellaneous Provisions, Article 103” (Oxford Public International Law) accessed October 10, 2022

^{^[1]} Narender Kumar, Constitutional Law of India (Allahabad Law Agency 2015).

^{^[2]} Durga Das Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur 2020).

^{^[3]} I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1999) 7 SCC 580

^{^[4]}Asia Human, Introducing Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2006).

^{^[5]} S. Gopalan, India and the Human Rights, 3, Lok Sabha Secretariat, 1998.

^{^[6]} Yadav A, ‘PRISONERS’ RIGHTS in INDIA: AN ANALYSIS of LEGAL FRAMEWORK Some of the Authors of This Publication Are Also Working on These Related Projects: PRISONERS’ RIGHTS in INDIA: AN ANALYSIS of LEGAL FRAMEWORK View Project’

^{^[7]} Aslam M, ‘Legal Dimensions of Prisoner’s Right in the Light of Article 21 of the Constitution of India’

^{^[8]} M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra, (1978) 3 SCC 544

^{^[11]} Dr. B.N. Tripathi, Jurisprudence-Legal Theory, 271 (Allahabad Law Agency, Haryana, 18th ed., Reprinted 2010)

^{^[13]} Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of India, (1981) 2 SCR 516.

^{^[14]} Re-Inhuman Conditions In 1382 .v. State Of Assam, (2013) 5 GLT 602

^{^[15]} Smt. Shakila Abdul Gafar Khan v. V.R. Dhoble, JT (2003) 7 SCC 749

^{^[18]} Smt. A.V. Janaki Amma v. Union of India, (2004) 1 ALD 19

^{^[20]} Amrit P and others, ‘Prisoner’s Rights and Prison Reform in India’ [2022] International journal of health sciences 10933

^{^[22]} State of Maharashtra v. Prabhakar, (1966)1 SCR 702

[1] Laurence R. Helfer, Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Conflict or Co-Existence?, 5 Minn. Intell. Prop.Rev. 47 (2003)

[2] International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted Dec. 16, 1966, arts. 15(1)(b) & 15(1)(c),

[3] International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted Dec. 16, 1966, arts. 15(1)(b) & 15(1)(c),

[4] Audrey R. Chapman, A Human Rights Perspective on Intellectual Property, Scientific Progress, and Access to the Benefits of Science, Panel Discussion on Intellectual Property and Human Rights at ³ (Nov. 9, 1998)

[5] ⁵ Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, LEGAL INSTRUMENTS–RESULTS OF THE URUGUAY ROUND, vol. 31, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994) [hereinafter TRIPS Agreement]; Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, Mar. 20, 1883, last revised at Stockholm, July 14, 1967, 21 U.S.T. 1583, 828 U.N.T.S. 305 [hereinafter Paris Convention]; Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, Sept. 9, 1886, last revised at Paris, July 24, 1971, 1161 U.N.T.S. 31 [hereinafter Berne Convention].

[6] Theodor Meron, Norm Making and Supervision in International Human Rights: Reflections on Institutional Order, 76 AM. J. INT’L L. 754 (1982)

[7] Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A(III), U.N. GAOR, 3d Sess., pt. 1, art. 27, U.N. Doc.A/810 (1948).

[8] American Declaration of The Rights and Duties of the Man, 1948.

[9] European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, opened for signature, 4 Nov. 1950, 213 U.N.T.S. 221, Europ. T.S. No. 5 (entered into force 3 Sept. 1953);

[10] Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, art. 17(2), 2000 J.O. (C 364)

[11] Laurence R. Helfer, Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Conflict or Coexisence?, 5 Minnesota Intellectual Property Rev. 47,48 (2003).

[12] ECOSOC,, Sub Commission on Promotion & Protection of Human Rights, Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights, Res. 2000/7, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/RES/2000/7 (Aug, 17,2000).

[15] Commissioner on Human Rights, Report of the High Commissioner on the impact of the Agreement on Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on Human Rights, para 10-15, U.N Doc.E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/13 (June, 27,2001)

[16] Convention against Discrimination in Education, Dec.. 14, 1960, 429 U.N.T.S 93.

[17] UNESCO, A Human Rights Based Approach to Education for all, 56 (2007).

[18] James Thuo Gathii, Rights, Patents, Markets and the Global AIDS Pandemic, 14 Fla. J. Int’l L. 261 (2002).

[19] International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted Dec. 16, 1966

[20] World Health Organization, Primary Health Care: Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care 2, 4 (1978)

[21] Joint Report of the WHO, UNICEF, the UNAIDS Secretariat and Médecins Sans Frontières: Sources and Prices of Selected Drugs and Diag nostics for People Living with HIV/ AIDS (2002)

[1] Jair Ribeiro, ‘Introduction to Inductive Learning in Artificial Intelligence’ (Medium, April 28, 2021)

accessed December 26, 2022.

[2] AI Data, ‘How do you train artificial intelligence’ (TELUSInternational, May 19, 2021) accessed December 26, 2022.

[3] James Manyika and Jake Silberg, ‘Tackling Bias in Artificial Intelligence (and in Humans)’ accessed November 9, 2022.

[4] Aditya Ramesh, ‘DALL·E: Creating Images from Text’ accessed October 13, 2022.

[5]https://ersj.eu/journal/1245/download/Legal+Status+of+Artificial+Intelligence+Across+Countries%3A+Legislation+on+the+Move.pdf

[6] Boyden B, “Emergent Works”, (2016) 39 COLUM. J.L. & ARTS 377, 384-88.

[7] OpenAI, “Sharing and Publication Policy” accessed November 16, 2022.

[8] OpenAI, “Terms of Use” < https://openai.com/terms/> accessed December 4, 2022.

[9] Guadamuz A, “DALL-E goes commercial, but what about copyright?” < https://www.technollama.co.uk/dall%C2%B7e-goes-commercial-but-what-about-copyright> accessed December 4, 2022.

[10] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).

[12] Jorawer Singh Mundy v Union of India and Ors (2021) Del 2306 (SCC Online).

[13] S.M. Dyechem Ltd. v Cadbury (India) Ltd (2000) AIR SCW 2172.

[14] Blog, ‘A Deep Look at Digital Art and Social Media’ (Artwork Archive) accessed December 20, 2022.

[15] A popular online service provider of photographs, videos and related media on subscription or pay-per-click model.

[16] Benj Edwards, ‘Shutterstock partners with OpenAI to sell AI-generated artwork, compensates artists’ (arsTECHNICA, October 25, 2022) accessed December 19, 2022.

[18] Naruto v Slater 888 F.3d 418 (9th Cir. 2018).

[20] Toliver Z, ‘Settlement Reached: ‘Monkey Selfie’ case broke new grounds for animal rights’

> accessed December 5, 2022.

[21] CoStar Grp Inc. v LoopNet Inc 373 F.3d 544, 546-47 (4th Cir. 2004).

[22] Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (2009) ECLI:EU:C:2009:465 Case C-5/08.

[23] Edward Elgar (ed), The governance of IP in EU and China (Edward Elgar Publishing: 2016).

[24] Janne Ihalainen, ‘Computer creativity: Artificial Intelligence and Copyright’ (2018) Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Vol 13 Issue 9.

[26] J.C. Ginsburg, ‘The concept of authorship in comparative copyright law’ (2002) DePaul L. Rev., 52, p.1063.

[27] Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights.

[28] WIPO Copyright Treaty, Article 1; TRIPs, art 2(2).

[29] Rehan, ‘Who Owns Computer Generated Works’ (Learn and Digest Blog, June 2014) accessed December 2, 2022.

[30] Edmond De Belamy (Obvious Art) <https://obvious-art.com/edmond-de-belamy.html> accessed December 23, 2022.

[31] A J Dellinger, ‘AI-generated painting sells for $432,000 at auction’ (End Gadget, October 25, 2018) < https://www.engadget.com/2018-10-25-ai-generated-painting-sells-for-432-000-at-auction.html#:~:text=It%20was%20expected%20to%20fetch,based%20art%20collective%20called%20Obvious> accessed December 20, 2022.

[32] Blog (Deep Mind) < https://www.deepmind.com/blog> accessed December 24, 2022.

[33] D. Kehoe, ‘Designing Artificial Intelligence for Games’ (2009) Intel Developer Zone Papers, accessed December 20, 2022.

[34] Publications (Deep Mind) accessed December 20, 2022.

[35] Ryan Abbott, ‘I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law’, 57 B.C. L. Rev. 1079 (2016).

[36] P Kapoor, ‘Approaches to measuring the intelligence of machines by quantifying them’ (2015) International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 10(4), pp. 81-83.

[37] EC Council: Ethical Hackers accessed December 18, 2022.

[1] Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Admn., (2009) 9 SCC 1

[8] Government of India, Report of the Committee to Study the Question of Legalisation of Abortion 36 (Ministry of Health and Family, 1966)

[9] Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1972 (Act of 1971), s. 3

[10] V Krishnan v G. Rajan & others HCHP 1450 of 19993.

[11] Government of India. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules and Regulations.VideGSR2543, New Delhi7 Gazette of India, 1975.

[1] MLA Thiyagarajan, Normative values of Right To Information act 2005 a critical study (2015), available at http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/76718/09_chapter2.pdf

[2] Anshul Agnihotri and Sankul Kabra, “Whistleblower Legislation in India: Comparison with International Standards”, Vol. 1, Indian Journal of Law and Policy Review, (2016).

[3]“Concept and Genesis of Right to Information” available at file:///C:/Users/gg/Downloads/09_chapter%202.pdf

[5] Chandi Ram, Right to information law and its implementation (2013), available at http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/32397/7/07_chapter%201.pdf.

[8] “History of Right to Information in India: Evolution and Challenges” available at http://rtiact2005.com/history-of-rti-act-2005-in-india-evolution-and-challenges/

[9] Dr. S.S.Srivastava, Right to Information (Central Law Agency, Allahabad, First Edition, 2012)

[11]Dr. Jyoti Rattan, Right to Information Act, 2005 (Bharat Law Publishers, New Delhi, 6th Edition, 2022)

[15]N.K. Jain, Right to Information: Concept, Law and Practice, (Regal Publications, New Delhi, 2007).

[16] Nikita Pasan and Surbhi Jain, “Critical Analysis Of The Whistle Blowers Protection Mechanism In Indian Law”

[17] Bok, S., “Whistleblowing and professional responsibilities”, Ethics teaching in higher education 277-295 Springer, Boston, MA, 1980.

[19] John A Grey, The Scope of Whistleblower Protection in the State of Maryland: A Comprehensive Statute is needed, 33U BALT.L.REV.225, (2004).

[20] Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S.E., Slocum, J., Staude, G. & Associates, Management 4^th South African Edition, Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 2001

[21] Peter B Jubb, "Whistle Blowing: a restrictive definition and interpretation”, Vol. 21, Journal of Business ethics, Issue 1, 1999.

[22] A. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, and W. Vandekerckhove, International Handbook on Whistle-blowing, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2014.

[24] Judy Nadler and Miriam Schulman, “Whistle Blowing in the Public Sector”, available at http://www.scu.edu

[25] “Whistleblower Protection”, Lawyers Update, Vol. XVIII, Part 5, May 2012.

[32] “Crusaders against Corruption: List of Whistleblowers in India”, available at https://knowledgeofindia.com/list-of-whistleblowers-in-india/

[1] https://ijalr.in/volume-3/issue-2/the-significance-of-judiciary-during-rape-case-verdicts-tisha-pattnaik/

[6] https://www.latestlaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Critical-Analysis-of-Rape-Laws-in-India-and-Judicial-Opinion-By-Sakshi-Rewaria.pdf

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE ROLE OF INTERPRETATION IN SOCIAL CHANGE: DECRIMINALISATION OF SECTION 377 IPC BY - VIDHI SANTOSH RANE

ARTICLE 103, UN CHARTER: ITS MANDATE AND OPERATION BY: VIDHI SANTOSH RANE

RIGHT AND REALITY BEHIND THE BAR: A LEGAL ANALYSIS BY - VRINDA JOSHI & PRAYAG SANGWAN

“ANALYSIS OF THE INTRICATE INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SACROSANCT REALM OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ESTEEMED DOMAIN OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS” BY - BAHITRA BASU & SHRI DHARSHAN R.V

DILEMMA OF OWNERSHIP OVER AI GENERATED ARTWORKS: AN IP OVERVIEW BY – ATUL BHATT, TUSHMI UDYALAK & SUHASINI

COMMERCIAL AND CORPORATE LAW CONSIDERATIONS IN THE AGE OF FINTECH: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS BY - ANJALY ANN JOSEPH, PARVATI & ANNA MARIA JOSEPH

ABORTION AND ITS DIMENSIONS BY - MANASVITA PRASAD AND PRIYANSHU RAJ

LEGAL CHALLENGES AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN FANTASY LEAGUE GAMES BY - VANSH DUA

RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF WHISTLE BLOWER BY - DR. VAISHALI THAKUR & MS. SUMANPREET KAUR

AN EXTENSIVE STUDY OF RAPE LAWS IN INDIA AND SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BY- ANISHA BHAGAT & OM RAJ ANKIT

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

THE ROLE OF INTERPRETATION IN SOCIAL CHANGE: DECRIMINALISATION OF SECTION 377 IPC BY - VIDHI SANTOSH RANE

ARTICLE 103, UN CHARTER: ITS MANDATE AND OPERATION BY: VIDHI SANTOSH RANE

RIGHT AND REALITY BEHIND THE BAR: A LEGAL ANALYSIS BY - VRINDA JOSHI & PRAYAG SANGWAN

“ANALYSIS OF THE INTRICATE INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SACROSANCT REALM OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ESTEEMED DOMAIN OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS” BY - BAHITRA BASU & SHRI DHARSHAN R.V

DILEMMA OF OWNERSHIP OVER AI GENERATED ARTWORKS: AN IP OVERVIEW BY – ATUL BHATT, TUSHMI UDYALAK & SUHASINI

COMMERCIAL AND CORPORATE LAW CONSIDERATIONS IN THE AGE OF FINTECH: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS BY - ANJALY ANN JOSEPH, PARVATI & ANNA MARIA JOSEPH

ABORTION AND ITS DIMENSIONS BY - MANASVITA PRASAD AND PRIYANSHU RAJ

LEGAL CHALLENGES AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN FANTASY LEAGUE GAMES BY - VANSH DUA

RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF WHISTLE BLOWER BY - DR. VAISHALI THAKUR & MS. SUMANPREET KAUR

AN EXTENSIVE STUDY OF RAPE LAWS IN INDIA AND SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BY- ANISHA BHAGAT & OM RAJ ANKIT

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2