·Refer to Order XXI, Rules 35-57 of the CPC for detailed provisions on attachment of property and the procedure for securing the decree amount through attachment.
·See Order XXI, Rules 64-100 of the CPC for the process of sale of attached property by public auction and the distribution of sale proceeds to satisfy the decree.
·Consult Order XXI, Rules 37-46 of the CPC for the circumstances under which a judgment debtor may be arrested and detained for non-compliance with the decree.
·See Order XXI, Rules 32-34 of the CPC for provisions regarding the court's power to order the delivery of specific movable property to the decree holder.
·Consult other relevant provisions of the CPC for additional miscellaneous provisions related to execution proceedings, such as interest on the decretal amount during execution.
Citation
Citation
[1]Dr.S.R.Myneni’s Contract-I General Principles, 115 (1st ed., 2010-11)
[2]Avtar Singh’s , Contract and Specific Relief, 69 (12th ed.,2017)
[3] Robert Whitman, Incorporation by Reference in Commercial Contracts, 21 Md. L. Rev. 1 (1961)
[4]Avtar Singh’s , Contract and Specific Relief, 70-78 (12th ed.,2017)
[5]AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011)
[1] Dr.Durga Das Basu’s Comparative Constitutional Law ,309,(Justice G B Patnaik,Yasobant Das,Rita das,3 rd
ed.2014)
[2]Navisha Uzaira Khan, Kohelica Nag, Comparative Study Of The Amendment Procedure In India, Switzerland, Canada, Usa, France And Germany,International Journal of Research and analytical review,260,276(2023),available at https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRARTH00136.pdf,last seen on 26/04/2024
[3] Ullman v. United States, 350 U.S. 422, 428 (1956)
[4]Navisha Uzaira Khan, Kohelica Nag, Comparative Study Of The Amendment Procedure In India, Switzerland, Canada, Usa, France And Germany,International Journal of Research and analytical review,260,276(2023),available at https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRARTH00136.pdf,last seen on 26/04/2024
[5] Mathias Reimann, Takeover: German Reunification Under A Magnifying Glass the Imperfect Union:
Constitutional Structures of German Unification. by Peter E. Quint. Princeton: Princeton University Press.1997. Pp. Xi, 482. $75., 96 Mich. L. Rev. 1988, 1995-96 (1998)
[7] Section 79 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany
[8]Navisha Uzaira Khan, Kohelica Nag, Comparative Study Of The Amendment Procedure In India, Switzerland, Canada, Usa, France And Germany,International Journal of Research and analytical review,260,276(2023),available at https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRARTH00136.pdf,last seen on 26/04/2024
[9]Shankari Prasad v.union of India AIR1951SC458 (followed by the majority in sajjan singh vs state of Rajasthan AIR1965 SC 845)
[10]Golakh Nath v.state of Punjab ,AIR 1967 SC 1643
[11] Keshvanand Bharti v.state of Kerala,AIR 1973 SC 1461
[13] Keshvanand Bharti v.state of Kerala,AIR 1973 SC 1461
[14]Uddin, Mohammad Moin, and Rakiba Nabi. “JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS IN LIGHT OF THE ‘POLITICAL QUESTION’ DOCTRINE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF SUPREME COURTS OF BANGLADESH, INDIA AND THE UNITED STATES.” Journal of the Indian Law Institute, vol. 58, no. 3, 2016, pp. 313–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/45163394. Last seen on 26/04/2024
[15] Dr.Durga Das Basu’s Comparative Constitutional Law ,315,(Justice G B Patnaik,Yasobant Das,Rita das,3 rd
ed.2014)
[16]Malek, Md. A. (2017). Vice and virtue of the Basic Structure Doctrine: a comparative analytic reconsideration of the Indian sub-continent’s constitutional practices. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 43(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2017.1358648, Last seen on 26/04/2024
[17] Dr.Durga Das Basu’s Comparative Constitutional Law ,316(Justice G B Patnaik,Yasobant Das,Rita das,3 rd
[3] Jaro Jasmin, A Comparative Study of Fundamental Rights in India and Canada, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v6i6/24061710.pdf, Last seen on 25/04/2024
[4] Vivek Krishnamurthy, Colonial Cousins: Explaining India and Canada’s Unwritten Constitutional Principles, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/72839538.pdf, Last seen on 25/04/2024
[5]Jaro Jasmin, A Comparative Study of Fundamental Rights in India and Canada, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v6i6/24061710.pdf, Last seen on 25/04/2024
[6] Dr. Durga Das Basu, Comparative Constitutional Law, 136-152 (3rd Edition)
[7] Vivek Krishnamurthy, Colonial Cousins: Explaining India and Canada’s Unwritten Constitutional Principles, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/72839538.pdf, Last seen on 25/04/2024
[8] Lalai Singh Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1987
[9]Satwant Singh Sawhney v. Ramarathnam, Assistant Passpost Officer, AIR 1967
[10] Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, AIR 1985
[11] Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v. M.N.R., AIR 1999
Citation
[1]Trimex International FZE Ltd. v. Vedanata Aluminium Ltd, (2010) 3 SCC 1
[2]Trimex International FZE Ltd. v. Vedanata Aluminium Ltd, (2010) 3 SCC 1