INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND USA BY: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

Authors: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

Registration ID: 107280 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7280

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

PROTECTION OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE BY: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

Authors: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

Registration ID: 107278 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7278 & IJLRA7283

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

A SOCIOLOGICAL INPUT - WOMEN IN PRISON BY - AYAN A. HAQ

Authors: AYAN A. HAQ

Registration ID: 107277 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7277

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: ayanhaq34@nalsar.ac.in

Page No: 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

BANK NATIONAZATION AND SOCIAL CONTROL OVER BANKING BY - NISHA MARUTI BHALEKAR

Authors: NISHA MARUTI BHALEKAR

Registration ID: 107276 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7276

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: nishabhalekar2@gmail.com

Page No: 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

RIGHT TO ACCESS THE INTERNET IN INDIA AS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BY - SHAURYA PRATAP SINGH, DIVYANSH SARATHE, VIKRANT AHLAWAT & DR. VIVEK KUMAR

Authors: SHAURYA PRATAP SINGH, DIVYANSH SARATHE, VIKRANT AHLAWAT & DR. VIVEK KUMAR

Registration ID: 107272 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7272, IJLRA7273, IJLRA7274 & IJLRA7275

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: singhshauryapratap2002@gmail.com, Divyansh0418@gmail.com, vikrantahlawat2307@gmail.com & dr.vivek@iudehradun.edu.in

Page No: 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

CASE REVIEW: TUKARAM V. STATE OF MAHARASTRA BY - SHROTAPANNA MISHRA

Authors: SHROTAPANNA MISHRA

Registration ID: 107271 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7271

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: shrotamisra@gmail.com

Page No: 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

CONCURRENT POWERS OF LEGISLATION UNDER LIST III OF THE CONSTITUTION BY: VAISHNAVI PRASHANT YADAV

Authors: VAISHNAVI PRASHANT YADAV

Registration ID: 107270 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7270

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: vaishnaviyadav6009@gmail.com

Page No: 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

REGINA V. AHLUWALIA CASE (1992): THE MOVIE ‘PROVOKED’ BY: ADITI SINGH

Authors: ADITI SINGH

Registration ID: 107269 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7269

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: aditisinght02@gmail.com

Page No: 09 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

BREAKING THE SILENCE: WHISTLE-BLOWING PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES IN INDIAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE BY- SONALI KHANDELWAL & DR. VALARMATHI R

Authors: SONALI KHANDELWAL & DR. VALARMATHI R

Registration ID: 107267 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7267 & IJLRA7268

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: sonali.khandelwal@law.christuniversity.in & valarmathi.r@christuniversity.in

Page No: 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

MATRIMONIAL CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN: A STUDY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE PROVISIONS UNDER BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA ACT, 2023. BY - SUMEDHA SINGH

Authors: SUMEDHA SINGH

Registration ID: 107266 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7266

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: sumedhasingh2609@gmail.com

Page No: 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Raman, R. (n.d.). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA, THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM. In LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (Vol. 3, Issue 10). https://journal.lawmantra.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/18.pdf

[2] S.P.Sathe, Judicial Activism in India, 2nd. Edition-,Oxford India Paper Backs, P.1.

³ Arthur T. von Mehran ,Peter L. Murray, Law in the United States, Cambridge University Press, 2 nd Edition, p.134.

[4] A comparative study on judicial review in India and USA. (n.d.). https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article 7332-a-comparative-study-on-judicial-review-in-india-and-usa.html

[5] (1952) SCR 597 (1952) SCJ 253, AIR 1952 SC196

[7] http://www.preservearticles.com/2011100314414/essay-on-the-indian-supreme-court-unlike-the-us-supreme-court.html

[8] http://archives.dawn.com/archives/67335,%2021.10.13

[9] http://vishwabhushan.blogspot.in/2011/09/judicial-review-concept-origin-and.html,%2021.10.13

[10] About the Supreme Court. (n.d.). United States Courts. https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about#:~:text=The%20best%2Dknown%20power%20of,Madison%20(1803).

[11] Judicial review in the United States | Office of Justice Programs. (n.d.). https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/judicial-review-united-states

[12] Marbury v. Madison. (n.d.). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Marbury-v-Madison/additional-info

[14]. Prof. Wade, Sir Edward Coke, Judge Spencer Roane, Samuel Chase, Marshall CJ, & Prof. Edwin Corwin. (n.d.). Judicial Review- scope, ambit and dimensions. https://nja.gov.in/Concluded_Programmes/2018-19/P-1110_PPTs/13.Sunday%20Club%20talk%20(Judicial%20Review).pdf

^{^[15]} International Journal of Law Management & Humanities. (2021, June 27). A Comparative Analysis of the Doctrine of Judicial Review in India and the U.S.A - International Journal of Law Management & Humanities. https://ijlmh.com/paper/a-comparative-analysis-of-the-doctrine-of-judicial-review-in-india-and-the-u-s-a/

[16] Shankari Prasad v. Union of India, MANU/SC/0013/1951

[17] Judicial review in the United States | Office of Justice Programs. (n.d.-b). https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/judicial-review-united-states

[18] Wikipedia contributors. (2023, September 13). Weeks v. United States. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeks_v._United_States#:~:text=United%20States%2C%20232%20U.S.%20383,Amendment%20to%20the%20U.S.%20Constitution.

[19] McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) | National Archives. (n.d.). https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/mcculloch-v-maryland

[20] Free Speech Center. (2024, February 19). Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015) - The Free Speech Center. The Free Speech Center. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/reed-v-town-of-gilbert/

[21] Testbook. (2024, January 18). Golaknath Case - History, Summary, Arguments & Judgement | UPSC. Testbook. https://testbook.com/ias-preparation/golaknath-case

^{^[23]} Wikipedia contributors. (2023b, December 23). Vishakha and others v State of Rajasthan. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishakha_and_others_v_State_of_Rajasthan

[24] Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record- Association and Another v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13 of 2015 (October 16, 2015).

^[1] Tolley V. Fry (1931) AC 333; (1931) 1 All ER Rep 131.

^[2] Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1.

^[3] Titan Industries Ltd. vs Ramkumar Jewellers, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382.

^[4] Souvanik Mullick and Swati Narnaulia, "Protecting Celebrity Rights Through Intellectual Property Conceptions", Volume 1 Issue 4 NUJS Law Review 615 (2008), available at: https://nujslawreview.org/2016/12/03/protecting-celebrity-rights-through-intellectual-property-conceptions/ (last visited March 15, 2024).

^[5] Titan Industries Ltd. vs Ramkumar Jewellers, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382.

^[6] R Raja Gopal v State of Tamil Nadu, 1995 AIR 264

^[7] R Raja Gopal v State of Tamil Nadu, 1995 AIR 264, para 9

^[8] Vikrant Rana, Nihit Nagpal and Akif Abidi, "Personality rights from Amitabh Bachchan to Sushant Singh to Anil Kapoor: Indian and Global View Point", Bar and Bench, November 03, 2023, available at: https://www.barandbench.com/law-firms/view-point/personality-rights-amitabh-bachchan-sushant-singh-anil-kapoor-indian-and-global-view-point (last visited on March 16, 2024).

^[9] The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act No. 47 of 1999).

^[10] The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act No. 47 of 1999), s.2(1)(m).

^[11] The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957).

^[12] The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act No. 21 of 2000).

^[13] The Indian Penal Code 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860).

^[14] The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Act No. 45 of 2023).

^[15] The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act 21 of 2000).

^[16] Ranjan Narula, "AI in conflict with personality rights in India", ManagingIP, October 06, 2023, available at: https://www.managingip.com/article/2ca8psx7p9fyiwd4h2ps0/expert-analysis/local-insights/ai-in-conflict-with-personality-rights-in-india (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[18] Nandini Yadav, "India moves to regulate AI tools, experts say too much: Story in 5 points", India Today, March 4, 2024, available at: https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/features/story/india-moves-to-regulate-ai-tools-experts-say-too-much-story-in-5-points-2510337-2024-03-04 (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[19] Nupur Thapliyal, "Delhi High Court Protects Actor Anil Kapoor’s Personality Rights, Restrains Use Of His Name, Image Or Voice Without Consent", Live Law, September 20, 2023, available at: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/delhi-high-court-anil-kapoor-voice-image-misuse-personality-rights-238217 (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[21] Shivaji Rao Gaikwad vs Varsha Production, 2015 (62) PTC 351 (Madras)

[1] Kruttschnitt, C. (no date) Women’s imprisonment, Jstor. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1147696.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3A6022a8cc57da7f3778c9575877bc118b&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1 (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

[2] IN 1940 CLEMMER DEFINED PRISONIZATION AS THE ASSIMILATION OF DEVIANT NORMS, VALUES, AND MORE OF THE INMATE CULTURE INTO AN INMATE'S PERSONALITY. HE CONSIDERED THIS TO BE A NATURAL ADAPTATION BASED ON AN ATTEMPT TO ESTABLISH AN IDENTITY WITHIN THE PRISON SOCIAL ORGANIZATION.

[3] WOMEN'S PRISON: SEX AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE. By David A. Ward and Gene G. Kassebaum. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1965. 269 pp.

[4] Women in prisons India. Available at: https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/Prison%20Report%20Compiled.pdf (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

[5] Kruttschnitt, C. (no date) Women’s imprisonment, Jstor. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1147696.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3A6022a8cc57da7f3778c9575877bc118b&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1 (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

[6] From the Women's Prison: Third World Women's Narratives of Prison, Barbara Harlow, Feminist Studies , Autumn, 1986, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Autumn, 1986), pp. 501-524

[7] Recidivism is one of the most fundamental concepts in criminal justice. It refers to a person's relapse into criminal behavior, often after the person receives sanctions or undergoes intervention for a previous crime.

[8] Women in prisons India. Available at: https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/Prison%20Report%20Compiled.pdf (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

[9] Sexual Revictimization and Retraumatization of Women in Prison, Danielle Dirks, Women's Studies Quarterly , Fall - Winter, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 3/4, Women, Crime, and the Criminal Justice System (Fall - Winter, 2004), pp. 102-115

[10] Women’s rights behind walls, Mechthild Nagel, Criminal justice in Nigeria, Colonial systems of control, University of Ottawa press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ckph37.18

[11] Our Prisons Punitive or Rehabilitative? An Analysis of Theory and Practice, Pluto Journals, Rais GulSource: Policy Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2018), pp. 67-83

^{^[12]} Feinman, C. (no date) Women in the criminal justice system. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/women-criminal-justice-system-1 (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

^{^[1]} Indian Penal Code, 1860 | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/203036/

^{^[2]} Indian Penal Code, 1860 | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/623254/

^{^[3]} Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1505766/

^{^[4]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 10]

^{^[5]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 9]

^{^[6]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 5] (reference for argument A) and B))

^{^[7]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 6]

^{^[8]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 9]

^{^[9]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 10]

^{^[10]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 10]

^{^[11]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 11]

^{^[13]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 12]

^{^[14]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 14]

^{^[15]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 19]

^{^[16]} Chintan Chandrachud, The Cases that India Forgot [Page 70]

[1] R v Ahluwalia [1992] 4 All ER 889

He died after 6 days and she was indicted for murder. In her first trial, she pleaded manslaughter because she had no intention to kill him and she just wanted him to feel the pain. But having bought caustic soda and the petrol before had was enough evidence to consider it malicious. She also pleaded provocation as a ground for defense but the jury rejected it as the danger was not immediate and according to them the Kiranjit had a reasonable amount of cooling down period.

[3] LawTeacher. November 2013. R v Ahluwalia - 1992. [online]. Available from: https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/r-v-ahluwalia.php?vref=1 [Accessed 4 October 2018].

[4] Deepak had threatened Kiranjit two hours before the incident that he would make her suffer if she did not give him the money by the next day.

[5] House of Lords in Director of Public Prosecutions v. Camplin (1978) 67 Cr. App. R. 14. Section 3 of the Homicide Act

[6] She wrote this in a letter which was read aloud in the movie ‘Provoked’ 2006

[7] According to section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), marital rape is a crime only when the wife is below 16 years of age. But for the protection of such women, we do have Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005) but we still need a strong defence for such tortured wives.

[1] Goel, S., 2014. Protection of whistle-blowers in India: a corporate perspective. Available at SSRN 2530397.

[3] Shikha Patheja, System of Whistle Blowing in India, Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 4, issue 7, July 2015, ISSN No. 2277- 8179.

[4] http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1693/Whistleblowers-and-their-Protection-in-India.html.

[5] Pradeep Kumar Gautam, Saurabh Mishra, et.al. (eds.), Indigenous Historical Knowledge Vol-I.pdf

[6] Where the law stands on whistleblowers in India - infosys episode (no date) The Economic Times. Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/where-the-law-stands-on-whistleblowers- in-india/sebi-mandates-provisions-for-whistleblowers/slideshow/71770786.cms.

[7] Aditi Pareek, Calling For Attention: Efficacy of Whistleblowing Laws in India, Vol.4, issue 2, IJLMH, 1947-1953 (2021).

[8] Agrawal, P., 2023. A Study on the Laws regarding Protection of Whistle-Blowers in India. Issue 2 Int’l JL Mgmt. & Human., 6, p.945.

[10] Kritika Sharma, Analysis of Real Consequences Faced by Whistle-Blower, in Indian Corporations, AKLegal. https://aklegal.in/consequences-faced-by-whistle-blower-in-indian-corporations/.

[11] Karthik Shiva. B, Whistle Blowers Protection Law in India - Safeguarding The Guardians of Good Governance, Vol. 4, Issue1, M S R Journal of Law, 116-131(2018).

[16] SEBI (Listing obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

[17] The Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2014, No. 7, Acts of Parliament, 2014 (India).

[18] Christian, J., 2006. Whistleblower Protection Under Sarbanes-Oxley: Key Provisions and Recent Case Developments. Okla. City UL Rev., 31, p.331.

[19] Rapp, G.C., 2007. Beyond protection: invigorating incentives for Sarbanes-Oxley corporate and securities fraud whistleblowers. BUL Rev., 87, p.91.

[20] Lui, A., 2014. Protecting whistle-blowers in the UK financial industry. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 11, pp.195-210.

[21] Kunal Gupta and Shruthi Rajan, Who can hear the whistle blow? Whistleblowing and its impact on corporate governance in India, available at: Who Can Hear The Whistle Blow? Whistleblowing And Its Impact On Corporate Governance In India India Corporate Law (cyrilamarchandblogs.com).

[22] The Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2014, No. 17, Acts of Parliament, 2014 (India).

[1] Lalitha Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2013), W.P. (Crl.) 68 of 2008 SCC

[2] Aditya Goswami, Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P., Legal Services India, (last visited on 28.02.2024), available at https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-2870-lalita-kumari-v-s-state-of up.html#:~:text=Gogoi%2C%20S.A.%20Bobde,Lalita%20Kumari%20v.,Article%2032%20of%20the%20Constitution

[4] Vagesrshwari Deshwal, BNS: A Critical Analysis, The Times of India, (last visited on 01.03.2024), available at https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/legally-speaking/bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-a-critical-analysis-of-the-proposed-law/

[9] “Manzoor Ahmed Bhat, Position of Women in the Indian Society, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE),Vol.2 Issue 5, May 2017”

[15] Shibra Siddiqui, Nearly Third of Crimes Against Women are by Husband or his Relatives, NewsClick, (last visited 02-03-2024) available at https://www.newsclick.in/nearly-third-crimes-against-women-are-husband-or-his-relatives

[18] Akshat Tiwari, Section 493 IPC, Legal Services India, (last visited on 04.03.2024), available at https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-8115-cohabitation-caused-by-a-man-deceitfully-inducing-a-belief-of-lawful-marriage-section-493-ipc.html

[19] Arun Singh v. State of U.P. AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 1758

[20] Rachit Garg, Punishment under Section 494 IPC, ipleaders, (last visited on 04.03.2024), available at https://blog.ipleaders.in/section-494-ipc-punishment/

[23] Shivani Panda, Sarla Mudgal v. UOI, iPleaders, (last visited on 05.03.2024), available at https://blog.ipleaders.in/bigamy-in-india-sarla-mudgal-case/#:~:text=Section%20495%20of%20IPC%20makes,whom%20subsequent%20marriage%20is%20contracted.

[25] Samridhi M, Dowry Death in India, Lawctopus, (last visited on 05.03.2024), available at 2011 (7) SCC 616

[32] Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

[33] Shrishti Kausal, Protection of women from domestic violence act, ipleaders,(last visited on 09.03.2024), available at https://blog.ipleaders.in/protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act/

[35] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, PRS INDIA, Ministry of Home Affairs, available at https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-2023

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND USA BY: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

PROTECTION OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE BY: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

A SOCIOLOGICAL INPUT - WOMEN IN PRISON BY - AYAN A. HAQ

BANK NATIONAZATION AND SOCIAL CONTROL OVER BANKING BY - NISHA MARUTI BHALEKAR

RIGHT TO ACCESS THE INTERNET IN INDIA AS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BY - SHAURYA PRATAP SINGH, DIVYANSH SARATHE, VIKRANT AHLAWAT & DR. VIVEK KUMAR

CASE REVIEW: TUKARAM V. STATE OF MAHARASTRA BY - SHROTAPANNA MISHRA

CONCURRENT POWERS OF LEGISLATION UNDER LIST III OF THE CONSTITUTION BY: VAISHNAVI PRASHANT YADAV

REGINA V. AHLUWALIA CASE (1992): THE MOVIE ‘PROVOKED’ BY: ADITI SINGH

BREAKING THE SILENCE: WHISTLE-BLOWING PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES IN INDIAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE BY- SONALI KHANDELWAL & DR. VALARMATHI R

MATRIMONIAL CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN: A STUDY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE PROVISIONS UNDER BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA ACT, 2023. BY - SUMEDHA SINGH

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2