INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

CHILDHOOD, LIFE’S BEST PART BUT NOT FOR ALL: JUVENILE CRIME AND DELINQUENTS BY: AKANSHA SHRIVASTAVA

Authors : AKANSHA SHRIVASTAVA

Registration ID : 107056 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7056

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : kukkuakansha.91@gmail.com

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-52399591/CHILDHOOD, LIFE’S BEST PART BUT NOT FOR ALL: JUV

STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: A STUDY BY - SATENDRA RAJPUT

Authors : SATENDRA RAJPUT

Registration ID : 107055 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7055

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : srajputlaw@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-11748577/STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACT

ELECTRICITY THEFT IN INDIA- LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES BY - DR. DEEPTI SINGLA

Authors : DR. DEEPTI SINGLA

Registration ID : 107054 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7054

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : dsingla@pb.amity.edu

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-33396479/ELECTRICITY THEFT IN INDIA- LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND PR

NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR V. UNION OF INDIA: A MILESTONE FOR LGBTQ+ 6 SEPTEMBER 2018 AIR 2018 BY - PRABHJOT SINGH CHAHAL

Authors : PRABHJOT SINGH CHAHAL

Registration ID : 107053 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7053

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : danialchahal@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-98428182/NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR V. UNION OF INDIA: A MILESTONE

JUVENILLE JUSTICE AND REHABILATION SYSTEM IN INDIA BY - KHUSHI OLA

Authors : KHUSHI OLA

Registration ID : 107052 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7052

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : khushiola15@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-22756252/JUVENILLE JUSTICE AND REHABILATION SYSTEM IN INDIA

VISHAKA & ORS. V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. AND PROCESS OF EXAMINATION OF WITNESS BY - SHETA JANVI VINOD

Authors : SHETA JANVI VINOD

Registration ID : 107051 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7051

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : janvisheta99@gmail.com

Page No : 25 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-39696335/VISHAKA & ORS. V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. AND PROCESS

DIGITAL SIGNATURE UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000, WITHIN THE SPHERE OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW - AN APPRAISAL OF ITS LEGALITIES BY - STUTI SHARMA

Authors : STUTI SHARMA

Registration ID : 107050 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7050

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : stutisharma.work@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-79626688/DIGITAL SIGNATURE UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

DESTITUTE WOMEN AND WIDOWS – ARE THEY BETTER POSITIONED IN OUR COUNTRY? BY - NAGASWETHA S

Authors : NAGASWETHA S

Registration ID : 107049 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7049

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : nagaswethas09@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-77356742/DESTITUTE WOMEN AND WIDOWS – ARE THEY BETTER POS

ENRICA LEXIE – JUSTICE DELIVERED OR NOT? BY - B. APARNA SUNDAR

Authors : B. APARNA SUNDAR

Registration ID : 107048 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7048

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : baparnasundar@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-56922255/ENRICA LEXIE – JUSTICE DELIVERED OR NOT?

FROM PERSECUTION TO PROTECTION: THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR LGBTQ+ MIGRANTS WORLDWIDE. BY - NIRALI NAYAK & DEBASMITA SAHA

Authors : NIRALI NAYAK & DEBASMITA SAHA

Registration ID : 1070458 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7046 & IJLRA7047

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : niralinayak26@gmail.com & debasmitasaha801@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2024-61654566/FROM PERSECUTION TO PROTECTION: THE LEGAL LANDSCAP

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] E F Albertsworth, Judicial Review of Administrative Action by the Federal Supreme Court, 35(2) Harvard Law Review, 127–53 (1921).

[2] State of Bihar v. Subhash Singh, AIR 1997 SC 1390.

[3] Minerva Mills v. Union of India, (1980) 3 SCC 625.

[4] R v. Hidl University, visitor [1993] AC 682 at 701.

[5] Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Company Ltd v. Riche, (1875) L.R. 7 H.L.653.

[6] P B Ajoy, Administrative Action and the Doctrine of Proportionality in India, 1(6) IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 16-23 (2012).

[7] David Stott & Alexandra Felix, Principles of Administrative Law, (1997) 81.

[8] State of U.P. v. Modi Distillery, (1995) 5 S.C.C.753.

[9] Associated Provincial Picture Houses v. Wednesbury Corporation, (1948) 1 K.B.223.

[10] Council for Civil Services Union v. Minister of Civil Services, (1983) 1 AC 768.

[11] Ajoy P.B., “Administrative Action and the Doctrine of Proportionality in India”, 16-23 [IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (JHSS) Volume 1, Issue 6) (Sep-Oct. 2012].

[12] Stynn in R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Daly, (.2001) 3 All ER 433 (HL)

[13] De Freitas v. Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture, (1999) 1 A.C. 69.

[14] Margit Cohn, Legal Transplant Chronicles: The Evolution of Unreasonableness and Proportionality Review of the Administration in the United Kingdom, 58(3) The American Journal of Comparative Law 583-629 (2010).

[15] R v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Federation Europeenne de la Sante Animale, (1991) 1 C.M.L.R. 50.

[16] Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 2386.

[20] Union of India v. Ganayutham, [1997] 7 SCC 463.

[23] Omkumar v. Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 3689.

[1] This anonymous quote highlights the detrimental effects of electricity theft on society, the economy, and the environment.

[2] Punishments for Electricity Theft In India, available at Electricity Theft Offences Punishments for In India- iPleaders (last visited March 15, 2024)

[3] “Whosoever commits the theft of electricity by tapping the wires, damaging the meter, tampering the meter or makes unauthorised use of the electricity, his/her actions shall amount to theft”.

[4] "State Commission" means the State Electricity Regulatory Commission constituted under sub-section (1) of section 82 and includes a Joint Commission constituted under sub-section (1) of section 83 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

[5] The use of block chain technology for secure and transparent recording of electricity transactions also reduces the risk of tampering or fraud. However, the implementation of such technological solutions may vary across different regions and utility companies due to factors such as cost, infrastructure, and technological readiness.

[7] This anonymous quote highlights the detrimental effects of electricity theft on society, the economy, and the environment, emphasizing the importance of addressing this issue through legal, technological, and socio-economic interventions.

· [1] Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 377, No. 45 of 1860, India.

· [2] Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 377, No. 45 of 1860, India.

· [3] Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 377, No. 45 of 1860, India.

· [4] Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 76 of 2016, Supreme Court of India (2018).

[1] Ins. by the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971, s. 2

[2] Added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, s. 2.

³ Ins. by the Constitution (Ninety-third Amendment) Act, 2005, s. 2 (w.e.f. 20-1-2006).

[4] Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 2 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

^{^[5]} (No date) Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Available at: https://judicateme.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Vishaka-v.-State-of-Rajasthan-Ors..pdf (Accessed: 12 March 2024).

[6] A .I. R 1997 S. C. 3011, 1997 6 SSC 241, JT 1997 (7) SC 384

^{^[7]} Lakhe, A. (2020) Case summary: Vishaka & others vs. state of Rajasthan, LawLex.Org. Available at: https://lawlex.org/lex-bulletin/case-summary-vishaka-others-vs-state-of-rajasthan/19202 (Accessed: 12 March 2024).

[8] Admin (2023) Examination of witness and cross examination - legal vidhiya, Legal Vidhiya -. Available at: https://legalvidhiya.com/examination-of-witness-and-cross-examination/ (Accessed: 12 March 2024).

[1] Hanscom B, Digital Signature Impact , INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW NETWORK, (September 15, 2010, 9:05 AM) https://www.academia.edu/37640493/A_Study_on_Importance_of_Digital_Signature.

[2] Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Constitutionality and Evidentiary value of digital signature, 55 INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 259, (2013).

[3] Abhudaya A, Prithwajit G., Use of digital signature in public interest, 26 SINGLE PROCESSING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 125, (2015).

[4] Payal Saha, Digital Signature Analysis, 29 DIGITAL SYSTEM AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW

JOURNAL 135, (2013).

[15] Mridul Kumar, An analysis of electronic signature in information technology, 16 STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE JOURNAL 2453, (2010).

[16] Vinayak Singh, Use of cryptography system in public interest, 25 DIGITAL SYSTEM AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 125, (2015).

[17] Prashant Singh, Digital and Evidentiary value of digital signature, 45 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 259, (2013).

[18] Dhruv Mukerjee , Digital Signature and electronic signature legal Impact , ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE AND TECHNOLOGY, (July 10, 2009, 8:10 AM) https://www.ijcsmc.com.

[19] Prashant Singh, Digital and Evidentiary value of digital signature, 45 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 259, (2013).

[20] Prasanna Kumar, An analysis of digital signature in information technology, 13 STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL SIGNATURE JOURNAL 2245, (2001).

[21] Sawant Jain , Brief of electronic signature in information technology, 10 STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE JOURNAL 2353, (2009).

[22] Prasanna Kumar, An analysis of digital signature in information technology, 13 STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL SIGNATURE JOURNAL 2245, (2001).

[23] Piyush Rai, An analysis of digital certificate in information technology, 20 STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE JOURNAL 2453, (2013).

[24] Rakesh Bhagat, Brief of Section 67A and the evidentiary value of digital signature, 45 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 295, (2015).

[25] Yogesh Goel, Information on the certifying authority system, 29 DIGITAL SYSTEM AND INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 135, (2013).

[1] Vishal Jeet V Union of India, (1990) 3 S.C.C 318 (India).

[2] Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, No. 78, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).

[4] Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987, No. 3, Acts of Parliament, 1987 (India).

[5] Widow Remarriage Act, 1856, No. XV, Acts of Parliament, 1856 (India).

[6] Hindu Succession Act, 1956, No. 30, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).

[7] Mt. Anarajia vs Tengari Kabar And Anr, A.I.R 1962 Pat 65 (India).

[8] D.F. Mulla, Mulla’s Hindu Law 796 (13^th ed. 1966).

[9] Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, No. 78, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).

[10] Raj Kishore Mishra v Meena Mishra, A.I.R 1995 All 70 (India).

[11] Pramila And Ors. vs Sarvar Khan And Ors, A.I.R 2003 ACJ 542 (India).

[12] Hindu Succession Act, 1956, No. 30, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).

[13] Chinnappa Goundar And Anr v Valliammal, A.I.R 1969 Mad 187 (India).

[14] Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, No. 43, Acts of Parliaments, 2006 (India).

[15] The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, No. 2, Acts of Parliament, 1974 (India).

[16] Shamima Farooqui V Shahid Khan, A.I.R 2015 SC 2025 (India).

[17] Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1937 (India).

[18] Indian Succession Act, 1925, No 39, Acts of Parliament, 1925(India).

[19] ANI, International Widows’ Day: What it’s like to be ‘vidhava’ in India, India.com (Jun. 23, 2016 9:43 AM), https://www.india.com/news/india/international-widows-day-what-its-like-to-be-vidhava-in-india-1280901

[1] The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v. India), Provisional Measures, https://www.itlos.org/en/main/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-24/ (last visited October 16, 2022).

[2] The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v. India), https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/117/ (last visited October 15, 2022).

[3] The Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 (India)

[4] The Notification of the Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of India, No. S.O. 671(E), dated 27 August 1981 (India)

[5] Republic of Italy v Union of India (2013) 4 SCC 721

[7] R. Krishnakumar, Enrica Lexie case: Justice denied, Frontline, (November 24, 2022, 12:32 PM), https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/article31987157.ece

[1] UN Women uses both “LGBTIQ+” and “diverse SOGIESC” where appropriate in global contexts.

[3]Paper from Los Angeles Pierce College, and University of Salford

[6] Lorinda Venter, LGBTQIA+ rights in South Africa, International Bar Association

[7] 11 October 2018, A Double Challenge: LGBTI Refugees and Asylum Seekers in South Africa

[8]This ensures non-discrimination for those of all sexual orientations and gender identities under “other status” of Article 2 in General Comment

[9] International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC). (2013). United Nations Treaty-Based Bodies – CEDAW, Paper on London School of Economics and Political Science

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

CHILDHOOD, LIFE’S BEST PART BUT NOT FOR ALL: JUVENILE CRIME AND DELINQUENTS BY: AKANSHA SHRIVASTAVA

STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: A STUDY BY - SATENDRA RAJPUT

ELECTRICITY THEFT IN INDIA- LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES BY - DR. DEEPTI SINGLA

NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR V. UNION OF INDIA: A MILESTONE FOR LGBTQ+ 6 SEPTEMBER 2018 AIR 2018 BY - PRABHJOT SINGH CHAHAL

JUVENILLE JUSTICE AND REHABILATION SYSTEM IN INDIA BY - KHUSHI OLA

VISHAKA & ORS. V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. AND PROCESS OF EXAMINATION OF WITNESS BY - SHETA JANVI VINOD

DIGITAL SIGNATURE UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000, WITHIN THE SPHERE OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW - AN APPRAISAL OF ITS LEGALITIES BY - STUTI SHARMA

DESTITUTE WOMEN AND WIDOWS – ARE THEY BETTER POSITIONED IN OUR COUNTRY? BY - NAGASWETHA S

ENRICA LEXIE – JUSTICE DELIVERED OR NOT? BY - B. APARNA SUNDAR

FROM PERSECUTION TO PROTECTION: THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR LGBTQ+ MIGRANTS WORLDWIDE. BY - NIRALI NAYAK & DEBASMITA SAHA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2