• +91 7042148991
  • editor@ijlra.com
IJLRA Logo
  • Home
  • Ethics & Policy
    • Duties Of Authors
    • Editors Responsibilities
    • Reviewers Responsibilities
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright Policy
  • For Authors
    • About Us
    • Call for Paper
    • Verify Certificate
    • Track Paper
    • Copyright Form
    • How to Publish Paper
  • Issue
    • Past Issue
    • VOLUME 1
      • ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 7
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 5
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 6
    • VOLUME 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 5
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 6
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME II ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUIE 1
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 8
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 10
    • VOLUME 3
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 2
  • Editorial Board
  • Verify Certificate
  • Submit Paper
IJLRA Logo
  • Home
  • Ethics & Policy
    • Duties Of Authors
    • Editors Responsibilities
    • Reviewers Responsibilities
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright Policy
  • For Authors
    • About Us
    • Call for Paper
    • Verify Certificate
    • Track Paper
    • Copyright Form
    • How to Publish Paper
  • Issue
    • Past Issue
    • VOLUME 1
      • ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 7
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 5
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 6
    • VOLUME 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 5
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 6
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME II ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUIE 1
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 8
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 10
    • VOLUME 3
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 2
  • Editorial Board
  • Verify Certificate
  • Submit Paper

CONSERVATION OF RIVERS IN INDIA BY: SARAHNA EKKA

Authors: SARAHNA EKKA
Registration ID: 101921 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1921
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: sarahnaekka27@gmail.com
Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

DIVORCE MADE EASIER: STRIKING DOWN SECTION 10A BY - HARISHRI S

Authors: HARISHRI S
Registration ID: 101920 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1920
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: iamharishri@gmail.com
Page No :10 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

FACTORS DRIVING GLOBAL MIGRATION PATTERNS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BY - ARYA MISHRA

Authors: ARYA MISHRA
Registration ID: 101919 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1919
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: aryamishra@nlunagpur.ac.in
Page No :19 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

FORCED SEPARATION, DEMENTIA & FINANCIAL DECISION IN FAMILY LAW: AN INDIAN ANALYSIS BY - ARATRIKA MANHAS

Authors: ARATRIKA MANHAS
Registration ID: 101918 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1918
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: aratrikamanhas@gmail.com
Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

LEGALISATION OF SAME SEX MARRIAGE: A WAY TOWARDS REMOVING HOMOPHOBIA FROM THE SOCIETY BY - AAYUSHI SAXENA

Authors: AAYUSHI SAXENA
Registration ID: 101917 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1917
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: aayushi.saxena@lloydlawcollege.edu.in
Page No :21 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

MERGERS & ACQUISITION IN INDIA BY – TALAT FATIMA & MS. SARITA YADAV

Authors: TALAT FATIMA & MS. SARITA YADAV
Registration ID: 101915 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1915 & IJRLA1916
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: talatfatima0786@gmail.com
Page No :11 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

RIGHT TO LIVE WITH DIGNITY CRITICAL ANALYSIS BY - SHREYANSH SINGH

Authors: SHREYANSH SINGH
Registration ID: 101914 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1914
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: shivansh1911@gmail.com
Page No :17 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

THE IMPCT OF E-BANKING ON USE OF BANKING SERVICES AND CUSTOMERS SATISFACTION BY - DHANASHRI RAMDAS SHEGAR

Authors: DHANASHRI RAMDAS SHEGAR
Registration ID: 101913 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1913
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: dhanashrishegar2310@gmail.com
Page No :14 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

THE RELATION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW BY - HARSHITA JAIN

Authors: HARSHITA JAIN 
Registration ID: 101912 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1912
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: harshita1993jain@gmail.com
Page No :16 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

WINDING UP OF BANKING COMPANY: INDIAN SCENARIO BY - KEDAR PRADEEP PIMPUTKAR

Authors: KEDAR PRADEEP PIMPUTKAR
Registration ID: 101911 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1911
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: kedarpimputkar96@gmail.com
Page No :17 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google
« Previous Next »

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

Ethics and Policy

  • Duties of Authors
  • Editors Responsibilities
  • Reviewrs Responsibilities
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Copyright Policy

For Authors

  • About us
  • Call for paper
  • Verify Certificate
  • Copyright Form
  • How to Publish Paper
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact us

Citation


[1] Kenneth Strong, Ox Against the Storm: A Biography of Tanaka Shozo – Japan’s Conservationist Pioneer (2005).
[2] Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States of America, Address to the Deep Waterway Convention at Memphis, Tennessee (October 4, 1907).
[3] National Geographic Society, River, July 30, 2019, available at https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/river/ (Last visited on May 4, 2021).
[4] Lawrence K. Lustig, Stanley A. Schumm et al, River, November 11, 2020, available at https://www.britannica.com/science/river (Last visited on May 4, 2021).
[5] Kim Rutledge, Tara Ramroop et al, Understanding Rivers, March 14, 2011, available at https://www.nationalgeographic.org/article/understanding-rivers/?utm_source=BibblioRCM_Row (Last visited on May 4, 2021).
[6] Jayanta Bandyopadhyay, Why we need a new perspective on rivers, July 25, 2018, available at https://www.orfonline.org/research/why-we-need-a-new-perspective-on-rivers/#:~:text=However%2C%20rivers%20play%20many%20important,spectrum%20of%20all%20human%20societies.&text=This%20is%20called%20the%20WEBS,Sediment)%20perspective%20on%20river%20basins. (Last visited on May 7, 2021).
[7] Ibid.
[8] Shubham Bahuguna, River Conservation in India, RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, Vol. 4, (April 2019).
[9] Salman M. A. Salman, Groundwater: Legal and Policy Perspectives: Proceedings of a World Bank Seminar (1999).
[10] The Convention on the Law of Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, Art. 5.
[11] Ibid.
[12] The Convention on the Law of Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, Art. 6.
[13] The Convention on the Law of Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, Art. 8.
[14] Ibid.
[15] Supra at 11.
[16] Ibid.
[17] United Nations, Summaries of Judgements, Advisory Opinions and Orders of the International Court of Justice 1997-2002, ST/LEG/SER.F/1.Add.2 (2003).
[18] The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, §2(a).
[19] The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, §29 and 35(6).
[20] The Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 39(b).
[21] The Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 51A(g).
[22] The Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 262(1).
[23] The Constitution of India, 1950, Schedule VII, List II, State List, Item 17 (Water).
[24] The Constitution of India, 1950, Schedule XI, Item 3 (Minor irrigation, water management and watershed development).
[25] The Constitution of India, 1950, Schedule XII, Item 5 (Water supply for domestic, industrial and commercial purposes).
[26] Taniya Malik, Inter-State River Water Disputes: A study in the light of the federal principle in India, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, Vol. 4, (October 2015).
[27] S. N. Jain, Alice Jacob & Subhash C. Jain, Inter-State Water Disputes in India (1971).
[28] The River Boards Act, 1956, §16(d).
[29] The River Boards Act, 1956, 5(2).
[30] Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar & Ors., AIR 1991 SC 420.
[31] Narmada Bachao Andolan, etc. v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2000 SC 3751.
[32] Lalit Miglani v. State of Uttarakhand and Ors., Writ Petition (PIL) No.140 of 2015.
[33] M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, [1987] 4 SCC 463.
[34] V. K. Srivastava, River Ecology in India: Present Status and Future Research Strategy For Management and Conservation, Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, Vol. 74, (December 2007).
[35] Hemant Pathak, Rivers Conservation Challenges and Opportunities: A Case Study of BundelKhand, Madhya Pradesh, India, International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Vol. 7, (December 2017).

Citation

Citation

[1] Deniz S. Sert & Tansu Ceyla Erenler, “Theories of Migration: Reasons for Mobility”, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS, 2020, available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6_8-1 (Visited April 3, 2023).
[2] “Migration”, available at https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/migration#:~:text=Some%20people%20move%20in%20search,disasters%2C%20or%20other%20environmental%20factors (Visited April 3, 2023).
[3] Kyaing Kyaing Thet, “Pull and Push Factors of Migration: A Case Study in the Urban Area of Monywa Township, Myanmar”, available at https://www.worldofstatistics.org/files/2014/03/Pull-and-Push-Factors-of-Migration-Thet.pdf (Visited April 3, 2023).
[4] Kainth, G.S., “Push and Pull Factors of Migration: A Case of Brick Kiln Industry of Punjah State”, ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2009, pp. 82-116.
[5] Ibid.
[6] H. Crow, “Factors Influencing Rural Migration Decisions in Scotland: An Analysis of the Evidence”, SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT SOCIAL RESEARCH, 2010.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Douglas S. Masse et al., “Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal”, POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1993, pp. 431-466, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938462?origin=JSTOR-pdf (Visited April 3, 2023).
[10] Ibid.
[11] Ibid.
[12] Corrado Bonifazi, INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION IN EUROPE, available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46mv64.9 (Visited April 3, 2023).
[13] Dr. Anwar-ul-Haq And Saif-ur-Rehman, “Socio-Economic and Psychological Factors in Rural-Urban Migration: A Case Study in Migration Selectivity”, PAKISTAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REVIEW, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1975, pp. 12-27, available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/25824826 (Visited April 3, 2023).
[14] Eytan Meyers, “Theories of International Immigration Policy-A Comparative Analysis”, THE INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION REVIEW, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1245-1282, available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/2675981 (Visited April 3, 2023).
[15] Supra, note 9.
[16] Ibid.
[17] Ibid.
[18] Ibid.
[19] “A Brief Overview of Theories of International Migration”, available at http://www.glopp.ch/C1/en/multimedia/C1_pdf1.pdf (Visited April 3, 2023).
[20] Philipp Engler et al., “Migration to Advanced Economies Can Raise Growth”, https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2020/06/19/blog-weo-chapter4-migration-to-advanced-economies-can-raise-growth (Visited April 3, 2023).
[21] Ibid.
[22] “Is migration good for the economy?”, available at https://www.oecd.org/migration/OECD%20Migration%20Policy%20Debates%20Numero%202.pdf (Visited April 3, 2023).
[23] Ibid.
[24] Rachel M. Friedberg and Jennifer Hunt, “The Impact of Immigrants on Host Country Wages, Employment and Growth”, available at https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/abs/10.1257/jep.9.2.23 (Visited April 3, 2023).
[25] “The Pros And Cons Of Migration”, available at https://www.embraceni.org/migration/the-pros-and-cons-of-migration/ (Visited April 3, 2023).
[26] Supra, note 19.
[27] Hania Zlotnick, “Measuring International Migration: Theory and Practice”, THE INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION REVIEW, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1987, pp. v-xii, available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/2546497 (Visited April 3, 2023).
[28] Ibid.

Citation

[1] Morris JC. The clinical dementia rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993 November 1; 43(11): 2412-2412-a.
 
[2] Folstein MF, Folstein SE, and McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 November; 12(3): 189–198.
[3] Kim SYH and Caine ED. Utility and limits of the mini-mental state examination in evaluating consent capacity in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatr Serv 2002 October 1; 53(10): 1322–1324.
 
[4] Begali VL. Neuropsychology and the dementia spectrum: Differential diagnosis, clinical management, and forensic utility. NeuroRehabilitation 2020; 46(2): 181–194.
 
[5] Ganguli M, Ratcliff G, Chandra V, et al. A Hindi version of the MMSE: The development of a cognitive screening instrument for a largely illiterate rural elderly population in India. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1995; 10(5): 367–377.
 
[6] International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) Version: 2016. Available from: http://apps.who. int/ classifications/icd10/browse/2016/ en#!/X (accessed 20 June 2021).
[7] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) 2013. Available from https://doi.org/10.1176/appi. books.9780890425596. (Last accessed 20 June 2021)

Citation


[1] Student, B.A.LL.B (IV Semester), Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida.
[2] Naz Foundation v Government of NCT of Delhi, (2009) 111 DRJ 1.
[3] Law Reports of the Commonwealth, 2009, pp.838 at 883.
[4] Sachit Bhogle. “The Momentum of History- Realising Marriage Equality in India.” 12 NUJS L. Rev. 3-4, 2019.
[5] Robert Wintemute. “Same-Sex Love and Indian Penal Code Sec. 377: An Important Human Rights Issue for India.” 4 NUJS L. REV. 31, 2011.
[6] Weisbrod. “Family, Church, and State: An Essay on Constitutionalism and Religious Authority.” 26 Journal of Family Law 754 (1988), http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/ law_papers/146); K. Hossain, “In Search of Equality: Marriage Related Laws for Muslim Women in Bangladesh” 5(1) Journal of International Women’s Studies, 2003, pp. 97.
[7] Stellina Jolly, Ritika Vohra. “Recognition of Foreign Same- Sex Marriage in India: A Legal Exploratory Analysis, Journal of the Indian Law Institute” July – September 2017, Vol. 59.3, pp. 302-326.
[8] P. D. Young. “Religion Sex and Politics: Christian Churches and Same-Sex Marriage in Canada” Fernwood Publishing, 2012, pp. 60.; L. D. Wardle. “Marriage and Religious Liberty: Comparative Law Problems and Conflict of Laws Solutions” 12 Journal of Law & Family Studies, 2010, pp.333.
[9] Sachit Bhogle. “The Momentum of History- Realising Marriage Equality In India”, 12 NUJS L. Rev. 3-4 2019.
[10] Ibid.
[11] Decriminalisation of Same Sex Sexual Activity.
[12] Williamn, Eskidge. “Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America.” 2008, pp. 118-127.
[13] National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Another v Ministry of Justice and Others, 1999 (1) SA 6.
[14] Edwin Cameron. “Sexual Orientation and the Constitution.” South African Law Journal, vol.450, 1993, pp. 468-69.
[15] Constitution Amendment Act 1997, § 38(2)(a).
[16] Constitution, 1998, Article 23(3), replaced by Constitution, 2008, Articles 11(2), 66(9), 83(14).
[17] Constitution, 2004 (amendment), Article 13(2)
[18] Constitution (approved by referendum on 25 Jan. 2009), Article 14. II.
[19] Mato Grosso, Constitution, 1989, Art. 10. III; Sergipe, Constitution, 1989, Art. 3.11 Federal District, Organic Law, 1993, Article 2; Alagoas, Constitution, 2001 (amendment), Art. 2-I; Santa Catarina, Constitution, 2002 (amendment), Art. 4-IV; Par, Constitution, 2007 (amendment), Art. 3-IV.
[20] Berlin, Constitution, 1995, Article 10(2), Brandenburg, Constitution, 1992, Article 12(2), Bremen, Constitution, 1947 (as amended on 4 Sept. 2001), Article 2; Saarland, Constitution, 1947 (as amended in Feb. 2011), Article 12; Thuringia, Constitution, 1993, Article 2(3).
[21] Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Constitution, I October 1996, Article 11.
[22] See http://vvAwwwr.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text en.pdf.
[23] All cited judgments of the Court are available at http: vXww.echr.coe.int.
[24] Smith & Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493.
[25] Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v Portugal (no. 33290/96), 1999.
[26] S.L. v Austria (Application no. 45330/99), 2003.
[27] §49-51 and §144(4)
[28] §42-47 and §53-54.
[29] Ferguson & Others v. United Kingdom, Application No. 8254/11.
[30] Ruth Vanita. “Democratising Marriage: Consent, Custom and the Law in Law Like Love: Queer Perspectives on Law”, 338, 347, 352 (Arvind Narrain & Alok Gupta), 2011, pp. 338,347,352.
[31] Aditya Menon, “Delhi Landlords Will Not Rent Homes To Muslims, Live-In Couples, India Today”, October 1, 2012, available at https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/delhi-landlords-will-not-rent-homes-to-muslimslive-in-couples-117469-2012-10-01; Monalisa Das, “No Law Prohibits Unmarried Couples From Staying Together, Still Hotels Refuse, The News Minute”, May 19, 2015, available at https://www.thenewsminute.com/lives/507, Ananya Bhattacharya, “Married Couples Only: Conservative India’s Moral Policing Extends To Airbnb, Quartz India”, July 18, 2017, available at https://qz.com/india/1030463/married-couples-only-conservative-indias-moral-policing-extends-to-airbnb.
[32] Sachit Bhogle. “The Momentum of History- Realising Marriage Equality In India”, 12 NUJS L. Rev. 3-4 2019.
[33] Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v Shri Lakshmindra Thritha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt, (1954) SCR 1005; Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v State of Bombay, AIR 1954 SC 388.
[34] M.P. Singh. Outlines of Indian Legal & Constitutional History. 118 (Universal Law Publishing Co., 8th ed., 2006; Nandini Bhattacharya-Panda. “Appropriation and Invention of Tradition: The East India Company and Hindu Law in Early Colonial Bengal” 2007.
[35] Saptarshi Mandal. “Do Personal Laws Get their Authority from Religion or the State: Revisiting Constitutional Status” 51(50) Eco. & Pol. Weekly, 2016.
[36]  State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali, AIR 1952 Bom 84.
[37] ibid.
[38]  Id., 90 (per Gajendragadkar, J.).
[39]  Id., 94 (per Gajendragadkar, J.).
[40]  Id., 94.
[41] Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments v Shri Lakshmindar Tirtha Swamiyar of Shri Shirur Mutt, 1954 AIR 282.
[42] Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb v State of Bombay, AIR 1962 SC 853.
[43] Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb v State of Bombay, AIR 1962 SC 853.
[44] Commissioner of Police v Acharya Jagdishwarananda Avadhuta, (2004) 12 SCC 770.
[45] Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v State of Bihar, AIR 1958 SC 731.
[46] Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Assn., 2019 SCCOnline SC 1461, ¶¶ 5, 7.
[47] ibid.
[48] Gautam Bhatia, supra note 42, 65. See also Gautam Bhatia, supra note 42, 91-92 (commenting on the holding in State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas, (1976) 2 SCC 310 that Article 16(4) permitting the State to make special provisions for the reservation of appointments or posts for underrepresented groups is a facet of, and not an exception to, the rule in Article 16(1) prohibiting discrimination on specified grounds).
[49]  Id., 48.
[50] National Legal Services Authority of India v Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438.
[51] Id., ¶82.
[52] National Legal Services Authority of India v Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438, ¶¶82-82.
[53] Andrew Koppelman. “Why Discrimination Against Gay Men and Lesbians is Sex Discrimination.” 69(2) NYU L. REV. 197 (1994).
[54] Categories like “men” and “women” are used for simplicity’s sake. Sexual orientation, like gender identity, exists on a spectrum and defies neat categorisation as “attracted to men” and “attracted to women” in the same manner in which gender identity is not limited to “identifies as a man” and “identifies as a woman”.
[55] Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶478 (per Chandrachud, J.).
[56] Id., ¶418 (per Chandrachud, J.).
[57] The Yogyakarta Principles, Principle 1.
[58] The Yogyakarta Principles, Principle 2.
[59] The Yogyakarta Principles, Principle 6
[60] The Yogyakarta Principles, Principle 24.
[61] Govt. of NCT of Delhi v Union of India, (2018) 8 SCC 501, ¶ 63.
[62] Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶ 459 (per Chandrachud, J.).
[63] Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶¶ 128 (per Misra, C.J.), 349, 351-352 (per Nariman, J.), 459 (per Chandrachud, J.). Malhotra, J. did not refer to constitutional morality. Instead, she relied on S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal, (2010) 5 SCC 600, ¶ 46, which states that social morality, being inherently subjective, cannot be the basis for criminal law that unduly interferes with personal autonomy (Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶641.3).
[64] John Vallamattom v Union of India, (2003) 6 SCC 611, ¶¶33, 36.
[65] S. Khushboo v Kanniammal, (2010) 5 SCC 600, ¶46.
[66] Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶136 (per Misra, C.J.).
[67] Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶474 (per Chandrachud, J.).
[68]  Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶¶93-99, 106, 190, 201-203 (per Misra, C.J.).
[69]  K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
[70]  Anuj Garg v Hotel Association of India, (2008) 3 SCC 1, ¶¶34-35.
[71]  K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1, ¶¶144-145, 298 (per Chandrachud, J., speaking for himself, Khehar C.J.., Agrawal J., and Nazeer J.), ¶645, 647 (per Kaul J.).
[72] An explicit statement to the effect that same-sex marriage was legalised, with the consequent and necessary changes to the various statutes governing marriage, would be obiter dictum, given that Navtej Johar was restricted to the question of §377 IPC.
[73] Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶479 (per Chandrachud, J.).
[74] Id., ¶482 (per Chandrachud, J.).
[75] Shayara Bano v Union of India (2017) 9 SCC 1.
[76] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, §§7(2), 9, 13(2), 24.
[77] Thomas John, Liberating Marriage: Same-Sex Unions and the Law in India in LAW LIKE LOVE: QUEER PERSPECTIVES ON LAW 355, 361 (Arvind Narrain & Alok Gupta ed., 2011). Arunkumar v. Inspector General of Registration, AIR 2019 Mad 265.
[78] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, §7.
[79] S. Nagalingam v Sigagami, (2001) 7 SCC 487.
[80] Ruth Vanita. “Democratising Marriage: Consent, Custom and the Law in Law Like Love: Queer Perspectives on Law”, 338, 347, 352 (Arvind Narrain & Alok Gupta), 2011, pp. 338,347,352.
[81] Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, §4.
[82] Junaid Jahangir. “Same-Sex Unions in Islam.” 24(3) Journal of Theology and Sexuality 157, 2018.
[83]  “The Quran.” Chapter 23, Verse 5-7.
[84]  Bible Gateway, Leviticus 18:22, available at https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus+18%3A22&version=NIV (Last visited on May 5, 2023).
[85] “Debating Bible Verses on Homosexuality.” New York Times, June 8, 2015, available at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/05/us/samesex-scriptures.html (Last visited on May 6, 2023).
[86] The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872, §4.
[87]  The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872, §60.
[88] See Special Marriage Act, 1954, §§ 4(c), 15(a).
[89] Nayantara Ravichandran. “Legal Recognition of Same-sex Relationships in India.” 5 J. IND. L. & SOC. 95, 105, 2014.
[90] Danial Latifi and Another v Union of India (2001) 7 SCC 740.
[91] Sachit Bhogle. “The Momentum of History- Realising Marriage Equality in India”, 12 NUJS L. Rev. 3-4 2019.
[92] The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the inability to procreate alone is not a sufficient ground for nullifying a marriage, and must be accompanied by a mental disorder that would make it unreasonable for the petitioner spouse to live with the spouse having the mental disorder. Alka Sharma v. Abhinesh Chandra Sharma, AIR 1991 MP 205.
[93]  The Domestic Violence Act, 2005, §§2(a).
[94]  The Domestic Violence Act, 2005, §2(f). See also Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma, (2013) 15 SCC 755, ¶¶38.5 (observing, obiter, that a domestic relationship between same-sex partners does not amount to a “relationship in the nature of marriage” under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005).

Citation

Citation

[1] Smt. Gian Kaur vs The State of Punjab on 21 March 1996
 
[2] Article 21 of the Indian Constitution 
[3] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
[4] Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi
[5] K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India.
[6] Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013
[7] Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996),
[8] State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Sripati Dubal (1987) 2 SCC 684

Citation

Citation


[1] Author is an Assistant Professor, IILM Law School, IILM University, Gurugram, India.
[2]  Mark W. Janis, “The New Oppenheim and its theory of International Law” 16 (2) Oxf J. Leg Stud 329 (1996).
[3] Understanding Core Differences between Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict, available at: http://www.hpcrresearch.org/blog/dustin-lewis/2012-04-17/understanding-core-differences-between-human-rights-and-international-h (last visited on April 28, 2023).
[4] On the relationship between IHL and IHRL ‘where it matters’ once more: Assessing the position of the European Court of Human Rights after Hassan and Jaloud, available at: http://www.qil-qdi.org/on-the-relationship-between-ihl-and-ihrl-where-it-matters-once-more-assessing-the-position-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-after-hassan-and-jaloud/  (last visited on April 28, 2023).
 
[5] Development of modern international humanitarian law, available at:  https://www.icrc.org/eng/who-we-are/history/since-1945/history-ihl/overview-development-modern-international-humanitarian-law.htm (last visited on April 29, 2023).
[6] The Foundation of International Human Rights Law, available at: http://www.un.org/en/sections/universal-declaration/foundation-international-human-rights-law/index.html (last visited on April 29, 2023).).
[7] International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights: Similarities and Differences, available at: http://www.gsdrc.org/document-library/international-humanitarian-law-and-human-rights-similarities-and-differences/ (last visited on April 29, 2023).
[8] Ibid.
[9] Implementing International Humanitarian Law: from Law to Action available at: https://www.icrc.org/en/download/file/5450/implementing_ihl.pdf (last visited on May 01, 2023).

[10] Effective implementation of international human rights instruments, available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/DocumentsSystem.aspx, (last visited on April 28, 2023).

[11] What is the difference between IHL and human rights law, available at: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-difference-between-ihl-and-human-rights-law (last visited on April 15, 2023).
[12] Louise Doswald-Beck and Sylvain Vite, “International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law” 33 IRCC 94 (1993).
[13] Ibid.
[14] Jacques Meurant, “Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law — Alike yet Distinct” 33 IRCC 89 (1993).
[15] Fourth Geneva Convention, Art 27: “All protected persons shall be treated with the same consideration by the Party to the conflict in whose power they are, without any adverse distinction based, in particular, on race, religion or political opinion". 
[16] Additional Protocol II to four Geneva Conventions, Art 4 (2) (f).
[17] Denise Plattner, “Protection of Children in International Humanitarian Law” 24 IRRC 140, (1984).
[18] Marco Sasso`li* and Laura M. Olson,“The relationship between international humanitarian and human rights law where it matters: admissible killing and internment of fighters in non-international armed conflicts” 90 IRRC 599 (2008).
[19] Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 38 (1) States Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for rules of international humanitarian law applicable to them in armed conflicts which are relevant to the child.
(2) States Parties shall take all feasible measures to ensure that persons who have not attained the age of fifteen years do not take a direct part in hostilities.
(3) States Parties shall refrain from recruiting any person who has not attained the age of fifteen years into their armed forces. In recruiting among those persons who have attained the age of fifteen years but who have not attained the age of eighteen years, States Parties shall endeavour to give priority to those who are oldest.
(4) In accordance with their obligations under international humanitarian law to protect the civilian population in armed conflicts, States Parties shall take all feasible measures to ensure protection and care of children who are affected by an armed conflict.
[20] The International Criminal Court and the United Nations Security Council: Perceptions and Politics, available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tiina-intelmann/icc-un-security-council_b_3334006.html (last visited on April 17, 2023).
[21] Isayeva v. Russia, 57950/00, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 24 February 2005.
[22] Isayeva v. Russia, 57950/00, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 24 February 2005, Para 175.
[23] Advisory Opinion Concerning Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 9 July 2004.
[24] Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic (Appeal Judgment), IT-96-23 & IT-96-23/1-A, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 12 June 2002. 
[25] Ibid at para 467.
[26] Coard et Al. v. United States, Report N. 109/99 - Case 10.951, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), 29 September 1999.
[27] Ibid at para 39. 

Citation


[1] https://www.vlaoffice.com/section-37-of-the-banking-regulation-act-1949-suspension-of-business/
[2] https://www.nabard.org/auth/writereaddata/tender/1409164208India_Banking_BankingRegulationAct1949.pdf
[3] https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/notice_circulars/section-42-1-of-the-reserve-bank-of-india-act-1934-maintenance-of-crr-2494.asp
[4] https://lawgist.in/banking-regulation-act/38A
[5] https://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1346/Winding-Up-of-Banking-Company.html
[6] https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/bankingregulation/43.php?Title=Banking&STitle=Booked%20depositors%27%20credits%20to%20be%20deemed%20proved
[7] https://blog.ipleaders.in/winding-up-of-banking-companies-under-banking-regulation-act-1949/
[8] https://blog.ipleaders.in/winding-up-of-banking-companies-under-banking-regulation-act-1949/
[9] https://indiankanoon.org/doc/91478007/
[10] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/7-international-banks-made-india-exit-last-2-decades-kanishka-gupta-?trk=pulse-article_more-articles_related-content-card
[11] https://www.moneylife.in/article/liquidator-appointed-for-winding-up-rupee-co-operative-bank-rbi/68797.html
[12] Ibid

Citation 2

65876451 adaskdjlkh lkhlkhasd

IJLRA N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)
  • +91-7042148991
  • editor@ijlra.com

LAW JOURNAL

  • About Us
  • Verify certificate
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us

IMPORTANT LINKS

  • Call for paper
  • How to Publish Paper
  • Submit Paper
  • Track your Paper Status
  • Search Issue

ETHICS & POLICY

  • Duties Of Authors
  • Editors Responsibilities
  • Reviewrs Responsibilities

© 2022 International Journal For Legal Research and Analysis

Designed by 1Web Experts