INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

Author Name: Dr.S.Krishnan Associate Professor Seedling School Of Law And Governance, Jaipur National University, Jaipur & Ms. Priya Rathore 6^th Sem Of Bballb (Hons) Seedling School Of Law And Governance, Jaipur National Niversity, Jaipur

Email Id :s.krishnan22@gmail.com

Title : Death Sentence And Criminal Justice In Human Rights Perspective

Gender Pay Parity - A distant dream (By Mausam Parikh)

Author Name: Mausam Parikh

Title: Gender Pay Parity - A distant dream

Email Id: 17bbl029@nirmauni.ac.in

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[2] Association of Students for Equitable Access to Knowledge (ASEAK) and Society for Promoting Educational Access and Knowledge (SPEAK)

[3] Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. 721 F.3d 132

[4] Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

[5] Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Paris Text 1971)

[7] Article 9: (1) Authors of literary and artistic works protected by this Convention shall have the exclusive right of authorizing the reproduction of these works, in any manner or form. (2) It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit the reproduction of such works in certain special cases, provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author. (3) Any sound or visual recording shall be considered as a reproduction for the purposes of this Convention.

[8] Cambridge University Press v. Becker, 863 F.Supp.2d 1190 (N.D.Ga., 2012)

[9] CCH Canadian Ltd. v Law Society of Upper Canada, [2004] 1 SCR 339

^{^[10]} Sec 29 of Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright.

[11] Case Comment: Delhi University Photocopy Case from Nigerian and South African Contexts Desmond Oriakhogba Journal of Intellectual Property Laws (2018) Issue III, 21 -30.

[1] Assistant Professor, School of Legal Studies, Himachal Pradesh University Regional Centre, Dharamshala, H.P.

[2] Divya Raisharma, What is social justice, https://blog.ipleaders.in/what-is-social-justice/

[3] S.P. Gupta v President of India and Ors. [1982] AIR 149 (SC) 26

[4] Sadhuram Bansal v. Pulin Behari Sarkar [1984] AIR 1471 (SC)

[6] Crown Aluminum Works v Workmen [1958] AIR 30 (SC); R.S. Swamiji v State of Mysore [1966] AIR 1171 (SC)

[7] J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Co. Limited v Labour Aellate Tribunal of India [1964] AIR 737 (SC) 743

[9] Workmen v. Reptakos Brett [1992] AIR 504 (SC)

[10] Municipal Corporation of Delhi v Female Workers (Muster Roll) [2000] 3 SCC 224, 32, 33

[11] Supranote 9; N.S. Giri v Corporation of City of Mangalore [1999] AIR 1958 (SC)

[12] Consumer Education and Research center and others v Union of India and others [1995] AIR 922 (SC)

[13] G.M., O.N.G.C. Ltd. v Sendhabhai Vastram Patel and Ors. [2005] Su (2) SCR 448

[14] Vishrut Kansal, Supreme Court of India Social Justice Bench: Maiden Dichotomy Between Equity and

Law in Indian Jurisprudential History, Law, Social Justice & Global Development, October 2015, Issue 1, p. 6, https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2015-1/kansal/lgd_2015_1_kansal_pdf.pdf; also see; Supreme Court Bar Association v Union of India [1998] 4 SCC 409

[15] Prakash Cotton Mills (Private) v The State of Bombay [1957] 59 BOMLR 836 (Bombay High Court)

[16] Crown Aluminum Works v Workmen [1958] AIR 30 (SC); Muir Mills Company Limited v Suti Mills Mazdoor Union [1995]

1 SCR 991; Consumer Education and Research center and others v Union of India and others [1995] AIR 922 (SC); Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. and Anr. v Union of India (UOI) and Ors. and Suresh Kumar and Ors. v Union of India (UOI) and Ors. [1996] 10 SCC 104; Air India Statutory Corporation, etc. v United Labour Union and others [1997] AIR 645 (SC); Gajaji Gopalji Jadeja v State of Gujarat [2005] 2 GLR 1142 (Gujarat High Court)

[18] SJB, being a specially constituted bench for securing social justice, will readily grant remedies sought by the petitioner even in borderline cases.

[19] Notification issued by Supreme Court of India 2

17_1418816381.pdf> accessed 01 February 2015.

[1] Gregory A. Caldeira, Constitutional Change in America: Dynamics of Ratification under Article V, 15 Publius 29 (1985).

[2]“D. D. Basu, Commentary on the Constitution of India (2012).”

[3]“Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).”

[4] Hugh Evander, The Doctrine of Amendability of the United States Constitution, 7 Indiana L. Rev. 457 (1932),

[5] William Marbury, The Limitations upon the Amending Power, 33 Harvard L. Rev. 225 (1919).

[6]“Shankari Prasad v. Union of India, AIR 1951 SC 458.”

[7]“Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, (1967) SCR 762.”

[8]“Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461.”

[10]“Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SCC 2299.”

[11]“George D. Skinner, Intrinsic Limitations on the Power of Constitutional Amendment, 18 Michigan L. Rev. 213 (1920).”

[12]“National Prohibition Cases, (1920) 253 US 350.”

[14] Erwin Chemerinsky, Amending the Constitution, 96 Michigan L. Rev. 1564 (1998).

[1]http://delhi.gov.in/wps/wcm/connect/doit_ddrs/DELHI+DISPUTES+RESOLUTION+SOCIETY/Home/About+Mediation last accessed on 11.8.18

[2] http://mediationcentrephhc.gov.in/ last accessed on 24.08.2018

[3] “Mediation for resolving family disputes” SHS Web of Conferences 30, 00018 (2016) https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/.../shsconf_shw2016_00018.pdf last accessed on 12.8.18

[4] https://www.familylawyers.in/mediation-and-counselling-at-family-courts-kerala-india...last accessed on 14.8.18

[6] “Promote Alternative Dispute Resolution in family Discords” available at http://www.Apcpkerela. org/Purpose.Php?Id=3 last accessed on 12.8.18

[7] https://www.divorcelawinfo.com/Divorce%20Mediation.htm last accessed on 11.8.18

[14] The said provision provides for court to record compromise decrees where parties have entered into a written agreement and adjusted their claims

[15] http://mediationcentrephhc.gov.in/?trs=ref_pro last accessed on14.8.18

[19] For details see http://mediationcentrephhc.gov.in/?trs=ref_pro last accessed on 14.8.18

[1] * Kashni, Student of LL.M. programme (3 years), University of Delhi, Faculty of Law.

[2] Justice K.S.Puttaswamy (Retired) v. Union of India, 2017 10 S.C.C.

[3] “The Indian Supreme Court Declares the Constitutional Right to Privacy” by Jayna Kothari, (OxHRH Blog, 4 October 2017) available at: https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/the-indian-supreme-court-declares-the-constitutional-right-to-privacy/ [accessed on April 10, 2021]

[4] Supra note 2.

[5] Supra note 2.

[6] Supra note 4 .

[7] Here, ‘informal’ means ‘not formally established by law’.

[8] Independent Thought v. Union of India, W.P. (Civil) No. 382 of 2013, decided on October 11, 2017 (Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, J.J.)

[9] The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women , 1979. It was signed by India in 1980 and ratified in 1993.

[10] The Convention on the Rights of Child, 1989. It was ratified by India in 1992.

[11] Such as- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDVA),

[12] Socio-Legal Review, “Independent Thought v. Union of India and the Unconstitutionality of Marital Rape”, Nov 6, 2017, available at: https://www.sociolegalreview.com/post/independent-thought-v-union-of-india-and-the-unconstitutionality-of-marital-0is%20not%20rape%E2%80%9D [accessed on April 7, 2021]

[13] AIR 1983 AP 356

[14] AIR 1984 SC 1562, (1984) 4 SCC 90

[15] Supra note 2.

[16] Air India v. Nargesh Meerza (1981)

[17] Shakti Vahini v. Union of India on 27 March ( 2018)

[18] CB Muthamma v. Union of India (1979)

[19] State of Maharashtra & Anr. v. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar (1990)

[20] Vishaka & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (1997), Delhi Domestic Working Women's' Forum v, Union of India & Ors. (1994)

[21] V. Tulasamma & Ors v. Sesha Reddi (Dead) By L. Rs (1977), Daniel Latifi v. Union of India (2001).

[22]International Women’s Day: 30 SC Judgments on Women’s Empowerment, available at: https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/landmark-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-that-changed-the-course-for-women-in-india-153592?infinitescroll=1 [accessed on April 13, 2021]

[23] Supra note 2.

[24] Anuj Garg & Ors v. Hotel Association Of India & Ors on 6 December, 2007

[25] Suchita Srivastava & Anr v. Chandigarh Administration on 28 August, 2009

[26] State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar on 23 October, 1990

[27] Abc v. State(Nct Of Delhi) on 6 July, 2015

^{^[28]}Supra note 4.

[29] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225; AIR 1973 SC 1461

[1] For details see 13^th protocol to the European convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

[1] A. Felicitla, Human Rights and Capital Punishment, in Human Rights and the Law: National and Global Perspectives, (Snow white) 1997, 207.

[1] AIR 1973 SC 947, 1973 Cr. L.J. 330, 1973 SCC (Original) 162.

[1] AIR 1980 SC 898. See also (1980) 2 SCC 684, 715 para 88.

[1] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597.

PATRIARCHY- Journey of an Ignoble Gap between Men and Women By - Priya Rathi

CASE COMMENT: THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS & SCHOLARS OF UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD & ORS v/s RAMESHWARI PHOTOCOPY SERVICES & ORS (2016) 160 DRJ (SN) 678 BY - SOUMI LAHIRI

TOWARDS JUSTICE: FOSTERING SOCIAL EQUITY IN INDIAS DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY BY - DR. BHAVANA SHARMA

REVISITING THE PROCEDURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIA AND USA (AUTHORED BY – ANMOL TANWAR)

USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE REDRESSAL MECHANISM VIS-A-VIS FAMILY DISPUTES IN INDIA: AN ANALYSIS BY - DR. KARAN JAWANDA & APARNA SINGLA

“WOMEN AND THE RIGHT TO INDIVIDUAL AUTONOMY” BY: - KASHNI

Analytic Examination On Right To Fair Trial Under Indian laws By – Tanveer Sethi & Sarthak Pant

Grounds of challenging a settlement under mediation (By Annu khanna & Pulkit Aggarwal)

Death Sentence And Criminal Justice In Human Rights Perspective (By Dr.S.Krishnan & Ms. Priya Rathore)

Gender Pay Parity - A distant dream (By Mausam Parikh)

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[12]“National Prohibition Cases, (1920) 253 US 350.”

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation