Open Access Research Article
THE INHERENT POWER OF THE COURT: A DISCUSSION UNDER CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
Published Paper
Article Details
THE INHERENT POWER OF THE COURT: A
DISCUSSION UNDER CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
AUTHORED BY
- ABHIRAJ VAIDYA &
SUHANI SHARMA
Inherent powers within the
jurisdiction of the court are basic and serve as defining traits, existing as a
permanent and indivisible quality. These inherent powers of a court are the
means at its disposal to guarantee that the parties concerned in a case get
complete and impartial justice. The courts have a moral duty to uphold justice
in all circumstances, whether explicitly stated in legal laws or not. This
obligation gives them great ability to administer justice even when specific
regulations are missing. This jurisdiction is sometimes seen as an inherent
prerogative of the court, even if it has not been officially conferred. Section
151 of the Civil Procedure Code examines and delineates the court's inherent
powers. The authority that accompanies this responsibility is significant and
far-reaching. It grants the courts the capability to dispense justice even in
the absence of a predefined legal provision. This aspect of their authority is
commonly referred to as their inherent authority, as it inherently resides
within the court's role in the justice system. This intrinsic authority is
considered vital for the courts to adapt to evolving societal needs and
unforeseen circumstances.
INTRODUCTION:
The
rule of law has always been a crucial component of civilization. It was present
before humanity were civilized, and
it is still there now that we live in a much more advanced environment. The existence of courts
greatly increases our awareness of the existence of law. The essential idea to do justice and to resolve
disputes amicably was upheld by the Courts
even when there was no
written law to support it. They are not as ancient as law, but only courts have recognized law. As a result of their
responsibility to uphold justice between the parties, they have a very prominent status in society. Every court must
be seen as having all the authority required
to carry out the right thing and correct the wrong in the course of administering justice since every court is
established to administer justice between the parties. Since the primary duty of the courts is to administer justice
rather than concentrating on the procedural
aspects of the parties, the Code of Civil Procedure is a procedural or
adjective law, and its rules must
be freely interpreted to advance the cause of justice and accomplish its purposes.[1]
The Law of Civil Procedure recognises the powers and restrictions placed on the
courts, however there are certain
inherent powers that belong to the courts but are not included in the code.
In addition to the particular authority granted to the court by the
statute, the court also has inherent
power. They work in addition to those abilities. The court is allowed to
utilize them to further the interests of justice or prevent misuse
of the legal system. The cause is clear. The court's rules are not all-inclusive for the simple reason that the legislature was unable to anticipate every scenario that may occur in a future court
case. In such unanticipated situations, inherent powers step in to save the day. Even in the lack of
provisions in the statute, they may be exercised
ex debito justitiae. However, they must be used responsibly and not arbitrarily.
OBJECTIVES:
1.
To study
the inherent powers of the
court.
2.
To analyze the inherent
powers and its exercise.
HYPOTHESIS:
H1:
The inherent powers of the courts under section 151 are a substantive provision.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS:
1.
What are the inherent
powers of the court?
2.
What is the procedure
of inherent powers and its exercise?
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
The methodology used in the research
is collection of secondary data from the various sites. The data has been taken
from the various internet sources and journals. The data was collected and then
was compiled to make this paper.
LITREATURE REVIEW:
The word "inherent" is a
rather wide one. Anything intrinsic or necessary, vested in or connected to a
person or position as a privilege right is referred to as something permanent
and inseparable from it, a permanent quality or feature, an important component,
or anything else (P Sirajuddin v. Government of Madras).
If the court judges that an
injunction order was breached while using its inherent powers, it may restore the parties to the same
position as if the injunction order had not been violated (Arjan Singh v. Punit Ahluwallia, 2008).
Inherent abilities cannot be used
contrary to the specific restrictions of the law. The concepts and methods pertaining to the assessment of expenses in administrative law proceedings cannot
be directly translated into the code-governed civil prosecution. It is
not permissible to use the inherent authority
of the courts to accomplish indirectly what is not lawful directly (Sarda, M. 2016).
The
inherent power may only be used in severe situations for which the Code provides
no way. It may not be used to invalidate a code provision. When the
code is unanimous on a particular subject,
the provision should not be regarded as extensive (National Institute of DTH 7 N Sciences v. C Parmeshwara).
When a party to a case undertakes
acts, such as collecting advantages by committing fraud against the court or another party, generating a multiplicity of
processes, etc., that party becomes the perpetrator of the abuse (takwani,
C. 2009)[2]
1.
INHERENT POWERS
OF COURT:
It is an ancient and well-established concept
that every court has the authority to act ex debito justitiae in order to administer the real
and substantive justice for which it alone exists. Additionally, the court has an inherent responsibility to
prevent the misuse of its established procedures.
The reason why the Code of Civil Procedure is not comprehensive is that the legislature is incapable of anticipating
all potential scenarios that may emerge in future litigation and, therefore, of creating procedures for all of
them. Therefore, the court has, in many
situations when the circumstances so necessitate, acted on the premise of
inherent authority. This
well-established concept is codified in Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which states: S. 151.
Preservation of the court's inherent powers. Nothing in this Code will be construed as limiting or
otherwise affecting the inherent authority of the Court to issue such orders as may be required for the interests
of justice or to avoid the abuse
of the Court's process.[3]
The provision in this section
is only suggestive of the court's authority
to issue such orders as may
be required to achieve justice's purposes and to avoid an abuse of the court's
process; it does not give
authority. As these authorities have a broad extent and reach, they enable the court to award
relief when justice
and equity so require. In the case of Raj Bahadur Ras Raja
v. Seth Hiralal, the Supreme Court said, "the inherent authority has not
been granted to the court; it is a
power the court has by virtue of its obligation to do justice amongst the
parties before it." This
judicial authority is restricted to the degree that it cannot be employed if
its exercise is inconsistent with or
in conflict with any of the powers explicitly or by necessary implication given by the Code on
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue. If there are explicit provisions that comprehensively cover
a certain issue,
then it follows that no
authority may be exercised on that topic in any way other than what is provided
by the relevant provision. In addition, the authority conferred by Section 151 cannot be employed
as an appellate power or to
issue administrative or ministerial
directives.
2. INHERENT POWERS BE EXERCISED:
In exercising its inherent powers,
the court must take into account two important considerations under Section 151. The first is that the powers are to be
utilized only for the sake of justice, and
the second is to avoid judicial process abuse. This authority must not be
employed when banned or excluded by the Code or other
legislation, or where
particular provisions of the Code are relevant to the pending dispute.
(Chaudhri 1917).
3. POWER TO BE EXERCISED: END OF JUSTICE
Courts have inherent authority to issue interim orders for the purposes
of justice or to prevent justice from
failing. The Supreme Court has remarked that the interests of justice are the
first consideration in granting or
denying pleas in a petition under Section 151, and that no rule or process may limit this authority of the
court. Though the order of is in the interest of justice, the superior court may refuse to intervene
under section 115, even if the lower court lacks the authority to issue such an order. Revision
interference is discretionary and should only be used in
cases when it serves the interests of justice. The decision of the Patna High
Court serves as an illustration of
this idea. It was determined that the possibility that the dismissal might be reviewed or altered under order 47 should
not impede the exercise of authority under this section. Similarly, intervention was deemed essential to protect
the minor's rights, as required under
Section 31 of the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890. In the interest of justice,
the court may also intervene with an order,
particularly an ex parte order,
that it issued in error,
even suo moto. As in any other matter, the court
cannot award relief based on its inherent jurisdiction if the same remedy may be granted by
another court under an explicit provision of the Code. (2013) Potts and Murray Sections 148 through 153 of the Civil
Procedure Code address the inherent
powers of the courts.[4]
Article 148 of the CPC states: Extension
of time: Whenever
the Court sets or grants a time limit for the performance of any act required
or permitted by this Code, the Court may, in its discretion, extend
such time limit from time to time.
Section 149 of the Code of Criminal Procedure states: Power to make up shortage of Court-fees:
- Where the whole or any
part of any fee prescribed for any document by the current law relating to court-fees has not been paid,
the Court may, in its discretion, at any stage allow the person by whom such fee is payable
to pay the whole or part, as the case may be, of such court- fee; and upon such payment the document
in respect of which such fee is payable shall have the same force and effect as if such
fee had been paid in the
first instance.
Article 150 of the CPC states:
Unless otherwise provided, if the business of a court is transferred to another court, the
receiving court shall have the same rights and responsibilities as those bestowed and imposed by or under
this Code upon the court from which the business was transferred.
Section 151 of the CPC is titled
"Reservation of inherent powers of the code:
-
Nothing
in this code will be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the inherent
powers of the court to issue such orders as may be required for the objectives
of justice or to avoid the abuse of judicial procedure.
Section 152 of the Criminal Procedure
Code states: Amendment of judgments, decrees, or orders:
-
Clerical
or mathematical errors in judgments, decrees, or orders, or errors resulting
from any unintentional slip or omission, may be remedied at any time by the
Court, either on its own initiative or at the request of any party.
Section 153 of the CPC reads: General
powers to amend: - The Court may, at any time and on such terms as to costs or
otherwise as it may deem appropriate, amend any defect or error in any
proceeding in a suit, and all necessary amendments shall be made for the
purpose of determining the real question or issue raised by or arising from
such proceeding.
Article 153-A of the CPC states:
Ability to change a decision or order after a summary dismissal of an appeal: -
Where an Appellate Court dismisses an appeal pursuant to rule 11 of Order XLI,
the power of the Court to amend, under section 152, the decree or order
appealed against may be exercised by the Court which had passed the decree or
order in the first instance, notwithstanding that the dismissal of the appeal
has the effect of confirming the decree or order, as applicable, passed by the
Court of first instance.
4.
WHERE THE COURT HAS NO INHERENT POWERS:
Inherent powers can’t be practiced
in contradiction to the
particular provisions of the code. The principles and practices relating to the
levy of costs in administrative law matters can’t be imported
precisely in connection with the civil prosecution
governed by the code. Provisions of the inherent power of the courts can’t be conjured
to do indirectly what is not permitted
to be done directly.[5]
The inherent powers of the courts
cannot be exercised under the following: -
·
Transfer
of Suits;
·
Stay
of proceedings under the 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act;
·
Continue
to work on income tax matters;
·
Payment
of future interest after the decree's effective date;
·
No
authority to change the decree to grant greater statutory advantages;
·
The
courts cannot restart a matter under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution by
filing a Miscellaneous Application;
·
To
hear an appeal from an order that is not appealable;
·
Modify
its decision after it has been signed;
·
The
court cannot change the final decree by invoking Order XLVII Rule 1;
·
The
Court has no inherent po wer to entertain an application for correcting a final
decree;
·
The
courts cannot set aside ex parte decree under its inherent powers;
FINDINGS
AND SUGGESTIONS:
Instances where Inherent Power can be exercised
by the courts:
·
To
order a combined trial of suits;
·
To
postpone suit hearings;
·
To
"enable a defense in the form a pauperism;"
·
To
remain at cross-suits for the sake of convenience;
·
To
"ascertain whether the proper parties are present;"
·
To
consider the request of a third party to be included as a party;”
·
To
register the heirs, even if it is determined that Order 1 Rule 10 cannot be
used;
·
To
"restore a suit dismissed for default in a case not provided by Order IX
Rule 9;"
·
To
"correct its own mistake;"
·
To
"review an order passed in a petition under 226 of the Constitution;"
·
To
"put aside a sale resulting from deception in the Court;"
·
To
stay earlier litigation pending the outcome of later litigation;
CONCLUSION:
Section 151 CPC is not a substantive
provision, as shown by the doctrinal study and the analytical technique.
Sections 148-153A provide the courts broad and comprehensive authority to limit
litigation, eliminate duplication of actions, and administer full and complete
justice to the parties before them. Section 151 preserves the court's inherent
powers, which are to be utilized ex debito justitae, or in the interest of
justice.
It is evident that the court's
fundamental powers are basically expansive and temporary. There are
restrictions on inherent powers, not because they are bound by the principles
of the Code, but because it is anticipated that the legislative process is
guided by the interests of justice.
Regardless of any restrictions that
may be imposed by the implementation of the provisions of Section 151 of the
Code, the unquestionable jurisdiction granted to that court by Section 151 of
the Code does not restrict the court's authority to issue an effective order to
prevent the misuse of its proceedings.
REFERENCES:
Ø
https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/constitutional-law/inherent- powers-ofthe-court-constitutional-law-essay.php?vref=1> accessed 31 May 2018
Ø
http://www.legalindia.in/inherent-power-of-civil-court-a-hand-maid-of- justice , lastly visited on 30/05/2018.
Ø
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1736/The-Inherent-Powers-of- theCourt.html , lastly visited on 27/05/2018.
Ø
Civil
Procedure Code with Limitations act,1963 by C.K.Takwani Pg. No:758
Ø
K.N.
CandrasekharanPillai (rev.), R.V. Kelkar, Lectures on Criminal Procedure, 4th
ed. 2006, Eastern Book Company, Lucknow.
Ø
P.
Sarkar and P.M. Bakshi (rev.), S.C. Sarkar, The Law of Criminal Procedure, 7th
ed. 1996, rep. 2001, India Law House, New Delhi.
Ø
Y.V.Chandrachud
(rev.), Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 16th ed. 2002,
rep. 2003, Wadhwa& Co. Nagpur, New Delhi.
Ø
PralhadJagannathJawale
and others Vs. SitabaiChanderNikam and others reported in 2011 (4) Mh.L.J. 137,
Ø
Dalpat
Kumar Vrs. Pralhad Singh reported in A.I.R. 1993 Supreme Court 276,
Ø
Zenit
Mata Plast Pvt. Ltd. Vrs. The State of Maharashtra reported in A.I.R. 2009
Supreme Court (Supplementary) 2364,
Ø
Morgan
Stanley Mutual Fund Vrs. Kartik Das reported in (1994) 4 Supreme Court Cases
225,
Ø
Dr.Lakshmi
T and Rajeshkumar S “In Vitro Evaluation of Anticariogenic Activity of Acacia
Catechu against Selected Microbes”, International Research Journal of
Multidisciplinary Science & Technology, Volume No. 3 , Issue No. 3, P.No
20-25, March 2018.
Ø
Trishala
A , Lakshmi T and Rajeshkumar S,“ Physicochemical profile of Acacia catechu
bark extract –An In vitro study”, International Research Journal of
Multidisciplinary Science & Technology, Volume No. 3 , Issue No. 4, P.No
26-30, April 2018.
Ø
iPleaders.
2022. Inherent Powers Of The Court Under Civil Procedure Code, 1908. [online]
Available at: https://blog.ipleaders.in/inherent-powers-of-the- court/ [Accessed 29 September 2022].
[1]India, l. (2022). The Inherent Powers of the Court. Legalservicesindia.com. Retrieved
30 September 2022, from
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1736/The-Inherent-Powers-of-theCourt.html.
[2]Civil Procedure Code with Limitations act,1963
by C.K.Takwani Pg. No:758 1) K.N. CandrasekharanPillai (rev.),
R.V. Kelkar, Lectures
on Criminal Procedure, 4th ed. 2006, Eastern
Book Company, Lucknow.
[3] India, l. (2022). The Inherent Powers of the Court.
Legalservicesindia.com. Retrieved 30 September 2022, from http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1736/The-Inherent-Powers-of-theCourt.html.
[4] The inherent
powers of Court. (2015). Retrieved 30
September 2022, from https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/constitutional-law/inherent-powers-ofthe-court- constitutional-law-essay.php?vref=1.
[5] Inherent Powers Of The Court Under Civil
Procedure Code, 1908. iPleaders. (2020).
Retrieved 30 September
2022, from https://blog.ipleaders.in/inherent-powers-of-the-court/.
Article Information
THE INHERENT POWER OF THE COURT: A DISCUSSION UNDER CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
Authors: ABHIRAJ VAIDYA, SUHANI SHARMA
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2023/09/07
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.