Open Access Research Article

SPECIAL INTENSIVE REVISION (SIR) OF ELECTORAL ROLLS: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

Author(s):
ROHAN ARUN WAGHMARE
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 6
DOI https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-37542915/SPECIAL INTENSIVE REVISION (SIR) OF ELECTORAL ROLL

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Free and fair elections constitute one of the basic features of the Constitution of India[1]. The legitimacy of every election depends not only upon peaceful polling and accurate counting of votes but also upon the correctness of the electoral roll from which those votes are cast. Recognising this constitutional importance, Article 324[2] entrusts the Election Commission of India with the responsibility of preparing and maintaining electoral rolls.
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls undertaken by the Election Commission generated considerable constitutional debate. While the Commission justified the exercise as necessary for maintaining accurate electoral rolls by removing duplicate, erroneous and ineligible entries, concerns were raised that the process might unintentionally result in the exclusion of genuine electors because of documentary or procedural difficulties. These issues eventually came before the Supreme Court.
This paper examines the constitutional validity of the SIR by analysing the relevant constitutional provisions, the Representation of the People Act, 1950, the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960[3], important judicial precedents and the Supreme Court's decision upholding the exercise. It also examines whether the constitutional objective of maintaining accurate electoral rolls can be effectively balanced with the equally important democratic objective of ensuring that no eligible citizen is denied participation in the electoral process except in accordance with law.
The paper concludes that while the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of the SIR, its long-term success will depend upon transparent implementation, procedural fairness and continued public confidence in the electoral process.


[1] Constitution of India, art 324; Mohinder Singh Gill v Chief Election Commissioner (1978) 1 SCC 405.
[2] Constitution of India, art 324
[3] Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: ROHAN ARUN WAGHMARE
Registration ID: 1013180 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13180
Year: Sep-2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 6
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 1020-1037

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.