Open Access Research Article
RESPONSIBLE AI IMPLEMENTATION: ETHICAL DILEMMAS DATA PRIVACY AND ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN TODAY S TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE
Published Paper
Article Details
RESPONSIBLE AI IMPLEMENTATION:
ETHICAL DILEMMAS, DATA PRIVACY, AND
ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN TODAY'S TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE
AUTHORED BY - JENNIFER GHOSHRAY *
ABSTRACT
Delving into the complex and dynamic
realm of artificial intelligence (AI) and technology, this article explores
three paramount challenges that demand careful consideration for the
responsible implementation of AI. Specifically, ethical dilemmas, data privacy
concerns, and algorithmic bias are examined, shedding light on their
significance, and proposing pathways towards a more equitable and ethically
grounded future. Emphasizing transparency, fairness, and accountability, the
article underscores the critical role of establishing robust frameworks for
responsible AI decision-making. By adhering to ethical principles,
practitioners can effectively navigate the intricate landscape of AI and
technology.
The importance of safeguarding data
privacy and security within the context of AI is further emphasized.
Comprehensive data protection regulations, transparent data collection
practices, and empowering individuals in controlling their personal data are
highlighted as essential measures. Such actions not only foster trust and
confidence in AI technologies but also mitigate the risks associated with data
misuse, while safeguarding individual privacy rights. Addressing algorithmic
bias emerges as another crucial aspect, stressing the significance of
recognizing and mitigating bias through comprehensive auditing, diverse
training data, and ongoing monitoring. By promoting fairness in AI systems,
equal opportunities can be ensured, particularly in areas like the legal field,
where biased AI algorithms have profound societal consequences.
The article concludes by providing
practitioners, policymakers, and researchers with actionable insights and
recommendations to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of AI and
technology. It offers practical guidance for the responsible implementation of
AI, placing emphasis on transparency, fairness, and accountability. By
considering the issues discussed, stakeholders can make informed decisions that
empower stakeholders in making responsible choices within the evolving landscape
of AI and accountability for the benefit of society.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI), Ethical dilemmas, Data
privacy, Algorithmic bias, Transparency
RESPONSIBLE IMPLEMENTATION OF
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, the advent of
AI has brought transformative advancements across various sectors. However,
with these advancements come a host of challenges that necessitate careful
consideration for the responsible implementation of AI. This article aims to
delve into the intricate realm of AI and shed light on three paramount
challenges that arise in this context: ethical dilemmas, data privacy
concerns, and algorithmic bias. By addressing these challenges, we
aim to pave the way towards a more equitable and ethically grounded future in
the realm of AI.
Pre-AI Era: Issues and
Problems
Before the emergence of AI, technological advancements already
presented their fair share of challenges. Issues surrounding data privacy and
the ethical implications of decision-making processes have long been subjects
of intense scrutiny. The increasing reliance on technology in various domains,
such as healthcare, finance, and transportation, raised concerns about the
security and privacy of individuals' personal information.
For instance, in the healthcare sector, the digitalization of
medical records and the exchange of sensitive patient data raised questions
about data security and unauthorized access.1F[2] Similarly, in the financial industry, the use of online banking and
mobile payment systems led to discussions about the protection of financial
information and the vulnerability of electronic transactions.2F[3] Moreover, the rapid automation of tasks and the potential
displacement of human workers prompted discussions on the societal impact of
technology-driven changes. The advent of automated systems in manufacturing
raised concerns about job losses and the need for upskilling the workforce to
adapt to the changing technological landscape.3F[4]
As technology continues to advance, the integration of AI
technologies marks a paradigm shift, introducing new dimensions and
complexities to the existing challenges. The emergence of AI brings forth
unique ethical dilemmas,4F[5] data privacy concerns,5F[6] and the potential for algorithmic bias,6F[7] necessitating fresh perspectives and approaches to ensure
responsible AI implementation.
The Shifting Paradigm:
Challenges in the Age of AI
With the rapid advancement of AI technology, the challenges confronting
both technology and society have reached a new level of significance. Ethical
dilemmas have become increasingly pronounced as AI systems gain the ability to
make autonomous decisions, prompting concerns about the biases and privacy
infringements that may be inherent in these systems.7F[8] The growing reliance on AI systems, which rely on vast amounts of
personal data, has intensified the need for robust regulations and transparent
practices to safeguard individuals' privacy rights.8F[9] The potential for algorithmic bias further compounds these
challenges, as biased AI algorithms can perpetuate discrimination and impede
equal opportunities across various domains.9F[10]
Consider a specific challenge of bias in AI algorithms used in the
employment hiring processes. Research has revealed that these algorithms can
lead to unfair outcomes and hinder equal opportunities for job applicants. For
example, a study found that an AI algorithm used in a hiring process exhibited
a bias against certain demographic groups, resulting in discriminatory outcomes
and perpetuating existing inequalities.10F[11] This highlights the importance of addressing algorithmic bias to
ensure fair and equitable hiring practices.
Another concern revolves around the privacy of personal data used by
AI systems. AI relies heavily on collecting and analyzing vast amounts of data,
including sensitive personal information. This raises significant data privacy
concerns, as the mishandling or unauthorized access to such data can lead to
breaches of privacy and potential harm to individuals.11F[12] Robust regulations and transparent data collection practices are
essential to mitigate these risks and protect individuals' privacy rights in
the age of AI.
Furthermore, the complex ethical implications of autonomous
decision-making by AI systems cannot be ignored. As AI algorithms become more
sophisticated, they increasingly make decisions that impact individuals' lives,
from credit scoring12F[13] to healthcare diagnosis,13F[14] to even criminal matters.14F[15] Ensuring transparency, fairness, and accountability in AI
decision-making processes is crucial to address ethical dilemmas and uphold
societal values. The forthcoming sections of this article will discuss these
challenges in a more comprehensive manner, exploring the intricacies of ethical
dilemmas, data privacy concerns, and algorithmic bias in the context of AI
implementation. By tackling these challenges and establishing robust
frameworks, we can harness the potential of AI while safeguarding individuals'
rights, promoting fairness, and fostering a more equitable and transparent
usage of AI technology.
ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN AI
DECISION-MAKING
The ethical application of AI has become a pressing concern
considering rapid technological advancements. It is imperative to ensure that
AI systems are designed and implemented in an ethical manner, taking into
account the potential biases, privacy infringements, and broader societal
implications they may entail. Ethical considerations hold particular
significance when AI systems autonomously make decisions that directly impact
individuals' lives, such as in healthcare, finance, and criminal justice.
In the realm of healthcare, the use of AI algorithms for diagnostic
and treatment decisions poses significant ethical questions.15F[16] While AI has the potential to enhance medical decision-making and
improve patient outcomes, careful implementation is necessary to address risks.
Notably, author Topol16F[17] demonstrated the superior diagnostic performance of an AI algorithm
compared to human cardiologists in certain heart conditions. However, concerns
arise regarding the transparency and explainability of AI-driven diagnoses.
Ensuring that patients and healthcare providers have confidence in AI system
decisions, along with the ability to understand and contest them when needed,
is crucial.
Similarly, in the financial industry, the application of AI
algorithms for credit scoring and lending decisions raises ethical concerns
with societal implications. While AI algorithms may offer efficiency and
accuracy in assessments, the fairness and potential for discrimination must be
carefully addressed. Research by Fuster17F[18] revealed biases in certain AI credit scoring models, resulting in
unequal access to credit for marginalized communities. These biases perpetuate
existing social inequalities and hinder equal opportunities for individuals.
AI bias in criminal justice applications is a critical ethical
concern that demands immediate attention. One alarming example is the risk
assessment algorithms used in sentencing decisions, which have demonstrated a
propensity for racial bias. A study by Dressel and Farid analyzed the COMPAS
algorithm,18F[19] a widely used tool in the United States for predicting recidivism
risk. The research revealed that the algorithm exhibited racial disparities, as
it falsely flagged black defendants as future criminals at almost twice the
rate of white defendants.19F[20] Conversely, white defendants were more likely to be mislabeled as
low risk compared to their black counterparts.20F[21] This kind of bias perpetuates systemic inequalities and undermines
the principles of fairness and equal treatment in the criminal justice system.
Hence, the responsible implementation of AI systems also necessitates
safeguarding data privacy and security, ensuring the protection of individuals'
privacy rights and mitigating the risks associated with data misuse and
unauthorized access.
SAFEGUARDING DATA PRIVACY AND
SECURITY
The Cambridge Analytica
Scandal: A Cautionary Tale
The protection of data privacy and security has become a matter of
utmost importance within the context of AI systems. As AI technologies rely
heavily on vast amounts of data, ensuring the safeguarding of personal
information has emerged as a pressing concern. The notorious Cambridge
Analytica scandal serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the risks
associated with data misuse and the erosion of individual control over personal
information.21F[22] In this scandal, it was revealed that personal data of millions of
Facebook users had been harvested without their consent and subsequently used
for targeted political advertising.22F[23] This incident raised significant concerns about the lack of control
individuals have over their personal information and highlighted the need for
robust measures to protect user privacy in the digital age.
To address these concerns, there is a growing recognition of the
importance of data protection regulations and transparency in data collection
practices. Scholars have extensively studied the implications of the Cambridge
Analytica scandal and its impact on data privacy. For example, Stanford
University23F[24] reported the legal and ethical implications of data misuse in the
context of social media platforms, highlighting the need for stronger
regulations and user control over personal data. Vössing et al.24F[25] examined the role of transparency in data collection and emphasized
the importance of informing individuals about how their data is collected,
used, and shared by AI systems. These scholarly works shed light on the
significance of regulatory frameworks and transparent practices in safeguarding
data privacy and security.
Empowering individuals with control and understanding of their data
is a crucial step in fostering trust and confidence in AI technologies. The
implementation of measures that provide individuals with greater control over
their personal information can contribute to a more privacy-centric approach to
AI. For instance, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR) has introduced strict guidelines for data protection and privacy, giving
individuals more control over their data and requiring transparency in data
collection and usage.25F[26] By adopting similar approaches and best practices, organizations
and policymakers can effectively safeguard data privacy and security in the age
of AI. Turning now to addressing the challenges posed by algorithmic bias in AI
systems and discussing strategies to promote fairness and mitigate bias in
decision-making processes.
ALGORITHMIC BIAS AND FOSTERING
FAIRNESS
Promoting Ethical AI
Practices
This section critically examines the issue of algorithmic bias in AI
systems,26F[27] focusing on its potential to generate unfair outcomes and hinder
equal opportunities in various domains, including criminal and civil law.
Research has revealed instances where these algorithms exhibit biases that
perpetuate discrimination and reinforce existing inequalities. These biases
pose significant challenges, causing harm and injury to individuals who are
disproportionately affected by biased AI systems.
For instance, in the field of criminal justice, a study highlighted
the case of an AI risk assessment algorithm used in sentencing that exhibited
racial bias.27F[28] The algorithm assigned higher risk scores to black defendants
compared to white defendants, potentially leading to harsher sentences for
individuals from marginalized communities.28F[29] This biased algorithmic decision-making undermines the principle of
equal justice under the law and perpetuates the systemic discrimination faced
by minority groups.
Consider other studies, such as "Predictive Policing and
Reasonable Suspicion" by Ferguson (2012).29F[30] This study examined the use of predictive policing algorithms,
which aim to identify areas with a higher likelihood of criminal activity. The
researchers found that these algorithms tend to concentrate enforcement efforts
on low-income communities and communities of color, resulting in
disproportionate surveillance and a heightened police presence in these areas.
This biased allocation of resources can contribute to the over-policing and
targeting of marginalized communities, perpetuating systemic biases, and
eroding trust between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve.
Similarly, the study "Discrimination in Online Ad
Delivery" by Ali et al., (2019)30F[31] explored the presence of algorithmic bias in online ad delivery
systems. The researchers discovered that these systems could exhibit
discriminatory behavior by selectively displaying ads to users based on their
gender or race. For instance, the study revealed that online job ads promoting
high-paying positions were more likely to be shown to male users than female
users, perpetuating gender-based disparities in employment opportunities. Such
biases in ad delivery systems reinforce existing inequalities and limit access
to resources and opportunities for certain groups.
Turning to civil law, biased AI algorithms used for predictive
analytics in insurance claims have also raised concerns. These algorithms have
been shown to discriminate against specific demographic groups, resulting in
unequal treatment and denial of coverage for individuals belonging to these
groups.31F[32] As such, an algorithm used to assess insurance claims may
disproportionately deny coverage to individuals from lower socioeconomic
backgrounds or specific geographic areas, perpetuating socioeconomic
disparities and limiting access resources.
These studies shed light on the challenges posed by algorithmic bias
in criminal and civil law, highlighting the potential for discriminatory
outcomes. They emphasize the need for robust measures to mitigate bias and
ensure fairness in AI systems. Algorithmic bias has real-world consequences for
individuals and communities, raising important ethical and legal concerns that
must be addressed to uphold principles of equality, justice, and non-discrimination
in the age of AI. The challenges presented by algorithmic bias in these domains
underscore the urgency of implementing strategies that promote fairness, equal
treatment, and justice.
MITIGATING ALGORITHMIC BIAS:
RECOMMENDATIONS
Comprehensive Auditing and
Bias Identification
To address algorithmic bias in the legal field, organizations should
prioritize conducting thorough audits of their AI systems.32F[33] These audits serve as essential tools for identifying and
rectifying biases that may be embedded within the algorithms. By examining the
data inputs, algorithms, and decision outputs, organizations can gain insights
into the potential biases or discriminatory patterns present in their AI
systems. For example, in the hiring process, audits can assess whether AI
algorithms exhibit biases based on gender, race, or other protected
characteristics.33F[34] These comprehensive audits allow organizations to uncover biases
that may perpetuate discrimination and take corrective actions to promote
fairness and equal opportunities for all applicants.
In the era of AI technology, where criminal and civil matters are
increasingly being processed through automated systems, the importance of
audits and oversight cannot be overstated. The use of AI algorithms in decision-making
processes, such as sentencing, case prediction, and legal analytics,
necessitates regular audits to evaluate their performance and impact.34F[35] Audits provide transparency and accountability, enabling the
identification and rectification of biases that may be embedded within AI
algorithms. Audits ensure that the outcomes of AI-powered legal processes
uphold the principles of justice, equality, and due process. Oversight can be
carried out by regulatory bodies, legislative committees, and judicial review
mechanisms.35F[36] This oversight helps prevent the misuse or abuse of AI technology,
safeguarding against unjust outcomes or violations of individuals' rights. By
implementing robust oversight measures, stakeholders can ensure that AI systems
are used responsibly, ethically, and in compliance with legal and
constitutional principles.
CONCLUSION
This article has addressed three key issues in the responsible
implementation of AI in diverse domains. The specific issues of ethical
dilemmas in AI decision-making, safeguarding data privacy and security, and
algorithmic bias were explored. This article has provided valuable insights and
recommendations to policymakers, organizations, and stakeholders. In terms of
ethical dilemmas, the article emphasizes the importance of establishing robust
frameworks for responsible AI implementation, upholding principles such as
transparency, fairness, and accountability. Regarding data privacy and
security, comprehensive data protection regulations, transparent data
collection practices, and empowering individuals in controlling their personal
data are highlighted as crucial measures to foster trust and confidence in AI
technologies. The article also delves into the significant challenge of
algorithmic bias, stressing the need for comprehensive audits and ongoing
monitoring to ensure equal opportunities, particularly in criminal and civil
law contexts where biased AI algorithms can have far-reaching societal
consequences.
By offering insights, examples, and recommendations, this article
contributes to scholarly literature on the ethical, privacy, and bias
challenges associated with AI implementation. Moving forward, policymakers and
stakeholders must carefully consider the issues raised in this article and take
proactive steps to address them. Prioritizing the development and
implementation of ethical frameworks, robust data protection measures, and
strategies to mitigate algorithmic bias are crucial. Collaboration among academia,
legal practitioners, policymakers, and technology experts is essential to
advance research, refine practices, and ensure that AI systems promote
fairness, transparency, and accountability. Responsible implementation of AI
requires a multifaceted approach that addresses ethical dilemmas, safeguards
data privacy and security, and mitigates algorithmic bias. It is through these
collective efforts that we can navigate the complex landscape of AI and
technology, ultimately contributing to a more equitable and ethically grounded
future for all.
*
Jennifer Ghoshray is a legal researcher and cognitive psychologist, who studied
law, psychology, and economic theory at the prestigious Rutgers University and
Florida International University in USA. She utilizes a multi-dimensional lens
through which to view mergers and acquisition and anti-trust issues, while
placing common citizens’ rights in the context. She has developed a unique
expertise in the conflict between development of artificial intelligence
fuelled Metaverse and existing laws, areas on which she has lectured at various
National Law Schools, such as the NUJS, Kolkata, NLIU, Bhopal, and Symbiosis
Law. Her presentation at the 2022 National Conference on Fintech, Data
Protection and Cybersecurity held at National Law University, Delhi traced the
emergence of digital capitalism at the praxis of technology’s ambition and
law’s inadequacy. The author can be reached at Jennifer.Ghoshray@gmail.com.
[1] Tegmark, M. AI and Physics, Lex
Fridman Podcast (Jan. 18, 2021), episode #155, at 2:217 (Paraphrased from the
podcast).
https://www.happyscribe.com/public/lex-fridman-podcast-artificial-intelligence-ai/155-max-tegmark-ai-and-physics.
[2] Murdoch, B. Privacy and Artificial
Intelligence: Challenges For Protecting Health Information In A New Era. BMC
Med Ethics 22, 122 (2021). [doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3].
[3] Moon, I., Shamsuzzaman, M.,
Mridha, M., & Rahaman, A. (2022). Towards the Advancement of Cashless
Transaction: A Security Analysis of Electronic Payment Systems. Journal of
Computer and Communications, 10, 103-129. doi: 10.4236/jcc.2022.107007.
[4] Vermeulen, B., Kesselhut, J.,
Pyka, A., & Saviotti, P. P. (2018). The Impact of Automation on Employment:
Just the Usual Structural Change? Sustainability, 10(5), 1661. doi:
10.3390/su10051661.
[5] Bankins, S., & Formosa, P.
(2023). The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Meaningful
Work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185, 725–740. doi:
10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7.
[6] Bartneck, C., Lütge, C., Wagner,
A., & Welsh, S. (2021). Privacy Issues of AI. In An Introduction to Ethics
in Robotics and AI. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51110-4_8.
[7] Jackson, M. C. (2021). Artificial
Intelligence & Algorithmic Bias: The Issues With Technology Reflecting
History & Humans, 16 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 299.
https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl/vol16/iss2/5.
[8] Thiebes, S., Lins, S., &
Sunyaev, A. (2021). Trustworthy artificial intelligence. Electron Markets,
31(3), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4.
[9] Rodrigues, R. (2020). Legal And
Human Rights Issues Of AI: Gaps, Challenges And Vulnerabilities. Journal of
Responsible Technology, 4, 100005. ISSN 2666-6596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005.
[10] Zajko, M. (2022). Artificial
Intelligence, Algorithms, And Social Inequality: Sociological Contributions To
Contemporary Debates. Sociology Compass, 16(3), e12962.
https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12962.
[11] Dastin, J. (2018, October 11).
Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women.
Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G.
[12] Pearce, Guy. "Beware the
Privacy Violations in Artificial Intelligence Applications." ISACA Now
Blog. May 28, 2021.
https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2021/beware-the-privacy-violations-in-artificial-intelligence-applications.
[13] Garcia, A.C.B., Garcia, M.G.P.
& Rigobon, R. "Algorithmic Discrimination in the Credit Domain: What
Do We Know About It?" AI & Soc (2023), DOI:
10.1007/s00146-023-01676-3.
[14] Murdoch B. Privacy And Artificial
Intelligence: Challenges For Protecting Health Information In A New Era. BMC
Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 15;22(1):122. Doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3. PMID:
34525993; PMCID: PMC8442400.
[15] Nicol Turner Lee, Paul Resnick,
and Genie Barton, "Algorithmic Bias Detection and Mitigation: Best
Practices and Policies to Reduce Consumer Harms," Brookings (May 22,
2019), https://www.brookings.edu/articles/algorithmic-bias-detection-and-mitigation-best-practices-and-policies-to-reduce-consumer-harms/.
[16] Bak, M., Madai, V. I., Fritzsche,
M. C., Mayrhofer, M. Th., & McLennan, S. (2022). You Can't Have AI Both
Ways: Balancing Health Data Privacy and Access Fairly. Frontiers in Genetics,
13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.929453. doi:
10.3389/fgene.2022.929453. ISSN 1664-8021.
[17] Topol, E.J. High-Performance
Medicine: The Convergence Of Human And Artificial Intelligence, Nat Med 25,
44–56 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7.
[18] Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P.,
Ramadorai, T., & Walther, A. (2022). Predictably Unequal? The Effects of
Machine Learning on Credit Markets. Journal of Finance, 77: 5–47.
[19] Dressel, J., & Farid, H.
(2018). The Accuracy, Fairness, And Limits Of Predicting Recidivism. Sci.
Adv., 4, eaao5580. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5580.
[20] Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S.,
Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to
predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica.
https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing.
[21] Ibid.
[22] Boldyreva, E. (2018). Cambridge
Analytica: Ethics and Online Manipulation With Decision-Making Process.
Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Contemporary
Issues in Business, Management and Education" (Vol. 12, pp. 91-102). doi:
10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.02.10.
[23] Rehman, I. u. (2019).
Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data harvesting: What you need to know. Library
Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2497.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2497.
[24] Maslej, N., Fattorini, L.,
Brynjolfsson, E., et al. (2023). The AI Index 2023 Annual Report. AI Index
Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA, April 2023.
[25] Vössing, M., Kühl, N., Lind, M. et
al. Designing Transparency for Effective Human-AI Collaboration. Inf Syst
Front 24, 877–895 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10284-3
[26] General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation).
https://gdpr-info.eu/.
[27] Shin, D., Hameleers, M., Park, Y.
J., et al. (2022). Countering Algorithmic Bias and Disinformation and
Effectively Harnessing the Power of AI in Media. Journalism & Mass
Communication Quarterly, 99(4), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221129245.
[28] Gravett, W. (2021). Sentenced by
an algorithm--Bias and lack of accuracy in risk-assessment software in the
United States criminal justice system. South African Journal of Criminal
Justice, 34(1), 31+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A688856609/AONE?u=anon~7f6f2f9&sid=googleScholar&xid=f24028e5.
[29] Ibid.
[30] Ferguson, A. G. (2012). Predictive
Policing and Reasonable Suspicion. 62 Emory Law Journal, 259.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2050001.
[31] Sweeney, L. (2013). Discrimination
in Online Ad Delivery. Communications of the ACM, 56. DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.2208240.
[32] National Association of Insurance
Commissioners. (2021). AI-Enabled Underwriting Brings New Challenges for Life
Insurance: Policy and Regulatory Considerations. Journal of Insurance
Regulation, 40(8), JIR-ZA-40-08.
[33] Simbeck, K. They Shall Be Fair,
Transparent, And Robust: Auditing Learning Analytics Systems. AI Ethics (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00292-7.
[34] Chowdhury, R., & Mulani, N.
(2018). Auditing Algorithms for Bias. Harvard Business Review.
https://hbr.org/2018/10/auditing-algorithms-for-bias
[35] Rigano, C. (2019). Using
Artificial Intelligence to Address Criminal Justice Needs. NIJ Journal, (Issue
No. 280), January. National Institute of Justice.
[36] Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.-C., &
Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public
governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government
Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577
Article Information
RESPONSIBLE AI IMPLEMENTATION: ETHICAL DILEMMAS DATA PRIVACY AND ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN TODAY S TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE
Authors: JENNIFER GHOSHRAY
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2023/07/17
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.