Published Paper
Article Details
RECENT MERGERS IN INDIA
AUTHORED BY - KHUSHI SINGH
ABSTRACT
Indian enterprises were
subjected to strict control regime before 1990s. This has led to haphazard
growth of Indian corporate enterprises during that period. The reforms process
initiated by the Government since 1991, has influenced the functioning and
governance of Indian enterprises which has resulted in adoption of different
growth and expansion strategies by the corporate enterprises. In that process,
mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have become a common phenomenon. M&As
are not new in the Indian economy. In the past also, companies have used
M&As to grow and now, Indian corporate enterprises are refocusing in the
lines of core competence, market share, global competitiveness and
consolidation. This process of refocusing has further been hastened by the
arrival of foreign competitors. In this backdrop, Indian corporate enterprises
have undertaken restructuring exercises primarily through M&As to create a
formidable presence and expand in their core areas of interest. This research
paper states three mergers and acquisitions that have taken place in last 5
years, including the strategic objectives of the acquiring company and how did
the transaction benefit the target company And also post-merger integration
challenges and the strategies employed by the merged entities to overcome them.
INTRODUCTION: MERGERS AND
ACQUISITION IN INDIA
Mergers and Acquisition is becoming a trend in
modern world. In short term we can define it as consolidation of companies.
Merging means two companies are combined to form a new company where as
acquisition means one company is taken over by the other company. In corporate
finance world M&A is one of the major aspects. [1]One
of the main reasons which motivate the companies to M&A is the value
created from this process. The companies go for M&A with the objective of
wealth maximization, increasing market share and some other reasons. M&A
can takes place by several methods, some of them are by purchasing common stock
of the company, by purchasing asset of the targeted company and so on. [2]The
main reason for M&A is to diversify the risk, to increase the market share
of the company, to increase the plant size and to improve company’s
performance. [3]In
India during the past two years several M&A has happened and some of them
has caused a rapid change in the market. There are four types of mergers and
acquisition, they are horizontal, vertical, conglomerate and concentric
merging. Even though M&A has certain advantages, this process involves
certain challenges. [4]Employee
retention, culture and communication are some of the major challenges faced by
the companies who undergo this process. From a survey conducted it is found out
that communication is one of the major challenges which led to M&A failure.[5]
CASE STUDY I: THE WALMART-FLIPKART
DEAL
FACTS AND BACKGROUND
This deal of Walmart with Flipkart can bring
about making a worldwide retailer on the lookout. The brand value of Flipkart
is notable and well established in India. As India is a huge market promising
appealing long-haul development, this obtaining has given Walmart an edge in
turning into a worldwide retailer by giving it admittance to roughly 10 crore
online clients. This arrangement speeds up the progressive globalization of
supply chains across differentiated classifications of items. [6]The
arrangement will assist the clients with having better admittance to different
merchandise, that too at a lesser cost, giving Walmart an upper hand against
Amazon.[7]
·
PARTIES
TO THE DEAL
Walmart: Walmart Inc is an American global retail organization which was started
by Sam Walton in the year 1962 and consolidated in the year 1969. It is settled
in Bentonville. It works number of hypermarkets, Rebate divisions and
supermarkets. At present Walmart has 11718 stores working under 59 unique names
in 28 nations. In monetary year 20918 it produced an income of roughly of
$500.3 billion. It has skill in the space of retail market and production
network the executives. One of the greatest opponents of Walmart is Amazon.
Flipkart: Flipkart is an online business organization which was established by
Delhi IITians and previous Amazon workers Sachin Bansal and Binny Bansal with
just rupees 4 lakhs in year 2007. It is settled in Bengaluru, Karnataka. It
utilizes almost 8000 super durable representatives and in excess of 20,000
provisional laborers. Its revenue expanded over the period from under $1
millions of every 2008-09 to $75 million out of 2011-12 and increased, with
different take overs enroute to reach $3 billion in year 2016-17. Today
Flipkart is one of the most esteemed internet business organizations which is
forcing a pinnacle valuation of more than $15 billion.
·
THE DEAL
Walmart has wrapped up Flipkart acquisition for
$16 billion (about Rs 1.05 lakh crore) to buy a 77% stake in Flipkart. The
decision to buy a greater part stake in on the web retailer Flipkart marks the
greatest e-commerce business bargain in the World. Out of the $16-billion
speculation, Walmart will contribute $2 billion in real money and buying shares
worth $14 billion from existing investors of Flipkart. Remaining business of
Flipkart will be held by existing investors of the organization, who are
organizer Binny Bansal, Tencent Holding Ltd, Tiger Worldwide Administration ltd
and Microsoft Corp. [8]
RULE OF LAW
The Walmart-Flipkart deal was subject to various legal and
regulatory frameworks in India. The following are the relevant laws and
regulations that governed this transaction:
-
Companies
Act, 2013: The Companies
Act, 2013 the primary law that governs the incorporation, management, and
operation of companies in India. The Walmart-Flipkart deal was structured as an
acquisition of shares, and hence, it had to comply with the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013.[9]
-
Competition
Act, 2002: The Competition
Act, 2002 is the law that governs the competition regime in India. The
Competition Commission of India (CCI) scrutinized the Walmart-Flipkart deal to
determine whether it violated anti-trust laws and led to a concentration of
market power.[10]
-
Foreign
Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999: The Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999 is
the law that governs foreign exchange transactions in India. The
Walmart-Flipkart deal involved the transfer of shares of Flipkart, held by
foreign investors, to Walmart, and hence, it had to comply with FEMA
regulations.[11]
-
Income
Tax Act, 1961: The Income
Tax Act, 1961 is the law that governs the taxation of income in India. The
Walmart-Flipkart deal was subject to taxation, and hence, it had to comply with
the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.[12]
ANALYSIS
The CCI approved the deal in August 2018
subsequent to directing an examination, expressing that it was not likely to
have any adverse impact on competition in the Indian market. The arrangement
was finished in August 2018, with Walmart getting a 77% stake in Flipkart
Gathering. This arrangement was viewed as a huge development in the Indian
e-commerce area and pulled in a great deal of consideration both in India and
worldwide.[13]
·
WHY
WAS FLIPKART ACQUIRED BY WALMART?
Walmart initially entered
India through a wholesale partnership with Bharti Enterprises, but this venture
failed and dissolved in 2013. Despite being present in India for over a decade
with 21 Best Price wholesale stores, Walmart has been unable to break into the
Indian retail market for more than 15 years due to the country's FDI
restrictions on multi-brand retail. With India now allowing 100% FDI in the
wholesale sector but only 51% in multi-brand retail, Walmart has identified
e-commerce as its only viable path to enter the Indian market. Flipkart, with
its estimated 100 million customers, represents Walmart's most promising
investment opportunity in the Indian e-commerce segment.[14]
India, following the US
and China, is projected to become the next major and rapidly expanding market
for online retail, with a predicted growth to $200 billion by 2026. As the last
large, untapped market globally, India presents a significant opportunity for
Walmart, as analyst firm Morgan Stanley asserts. Walmart's investment in
Flipkart aligns with the company's vision for future growth, as e-commerce
currently accounts for less than 4% of India's retail market but is poised for
substantial expansion as smartphone (and internet) penetration rapidly
increases over the next decade.[15]
Walmart and Amazon,
fierce rivals in the US, mirror their competitive dynamic in India. While
Walmart dominates brick-and-mortar stores in the US, Amazon reigns supreme in
the e-commerce arena. [16]By
acquiring Flipkart, Walmart extends this rivalry to India, opening a new front
in their ongoing battle for market supremacy. Notably, Amazon lags behind
Flipkart in terms of gross merchandise value (GMV).
Flipkart's robust supply
chain arm, e-Cart, serves over 800 cities and executes 500,000 deliveries daily,
further bolstering Walmart's decision to acquire the company. Additionally,
Flipkart's strong market position in smartphones (40% share) and fashion (60%
share, including its subsidiaries Jabong and Myntra) further enhances its
attractiveness as an investment partner.[17]
Flipkart stands as
India's third most funded private company, having raised over $7 billion from
renowned investors such as Softbank, Morgan Stanley, DGT Global, and Accel
Partners, among others. India's online grocery market is poised for significant
growth in the coming years, with Flipkart well-positioned to capitalize on this
trend. Currently, only a handful of players, such as Grofers and BigBasket,
operate in this market, but other retailers have begun to invest in this
segment, recognizing its potential.[18]
·
IMPACT
ON INDIAN ECONOMY
Positive Impacts:
-
Employment: Walmart's
investment is expected to create new jobs and boost the e-commerce sector,
which is currently less than 4% of India's retail market.
-
Low prices, more
variety: Competition between e-commerce giants will lead to lower prices
and more product variety for consumers.
-
Research and
development: Walmart's expertise in research and development could benefit
Indian companies and help to improve the quality of Indian products.
-
Efficient supply
chain: Walmart's experience in logistics and supply chain management could
improve efficiency and reduce costs for Indian businesses.
-
Economic growth: The
expansion of e-commerce could stimulate economic growth in India.
Negative Impacts:
-
Data privacy concerns: The
acquisition raises concerns about the privacy of Indian consumers' data.
-
Impact on sellers: Smaller
businesses could be squeezed out of the market by Walmart's lower prices.
-
Threat to brick and mortar
stores: Walmart's presence could lead to the closure of some brick and
mortar stores.
-
Threat to small
players: Small businesses could be driven out of business by the increased
competition.
-
Pan India protests: The
deal has already sparked protests from trade unions and retailers.
-
Backdoor entry for
Walmart: The acquisition could allow Walmart to bypass restrictions on
foreign direct investment in multi-brand retail.
POST-MERGER INTEGRATION CHALLENGES
The Walmart-Flipkart merger marked a pivotal moment in the Indian
e-commerce landscape, bringing together two powerhouses with the potential to
transform the sector. However, this merger also presented a unique set of
challenges that required meticulous planning and strategic execution to ensure
a successful integration.
One of the primary challenges was cultural
integration. Walmart and Flipkart, both global brands with established
corporate cultures, needed to seamlessly blend their distinct values and
practices to foster a cohesive and productive work environment. Open
communication, mutual respect, and a willingness to adapt were essential in
navigating this cultural convergence.
Technology integration posed another
significant challenge. Walmart and Flipkart operated on different IT systems,
which needed to be seamlessly integrated to facilitate seamless data exchange,
streamlined operations, and a unified customer experience. This undertaking
demanded a deep understanding of both systems, meticulous data migration, and
rigorous compatibility testing. Leadership and talent management also required
careful consideration. The merger necessitated the formation of a new
leadership team capable of navigating the complexities of the merged
organization, driving synergies, and fostering innovation while adapting to the
unique demands of the Indian market.
Finally, managing change and uncertainty was
paramount. Mergers often bring about a period of disruption and uncertainty,
which can negatively impact employee morale and productivity. Walmart and
Flipkart implemented a robust communication strategy to keep employees informed
about the integration process, address concerns openly
and transparently, and foster a sense of ownership and engagement among the
workforce. By effectively addressing these
post-merger integration challenges, Walmart and Flipkart laid the foundation
for a thriving merged entity that was well-positioned to capitalize on the
immense growth potential of the Indian e-commerce market. Their experiences and
lessons learned will undoubtedly inform future mergers and acquisitions in the
sector.[19]
CASE STUDY II: THE HDFC BANK AND
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION MERGER
FACTS AND BACKGROUND
As competition increments intensively this
consolidation is probably going to have significant ramifications for the
monetary area. Accordingly, Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited
(HDFC Ltd) the biggest Housing Finance company in India will be merged into
HDFC Bank Ltd the largest private bank. where HDFC Ltd has Rs 5.3 trillion
worth of Resources Under Management (AUM) and Rs 4.45 trillion worth of market
cap HDFC Bank Ltd has Rs 8.35 trillion worth of market cap. The element will
get the strength of a joined monetary record of 18 trillion (18 lakh crore) and
a total asset of 3.3 trillion (3.3 lakh crore). Around 9 million homes were
given or funded by Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited Restricted
in the excursion of 45 years.[20]
While this consolidation will give a huge
client base to sell the items, HDFC bank will get influence of circulation of
their items across metropolitan, semi-metropolitan, and rustic regions. After
the consolidation Investors of HDFC Ltd. Will claim around 41 % of HDFC Bank
Ltd., and HDFC Ltd shareholdings will be smothered in HDFC Bank Ltd.[21]
ANALYSIS
On fourth April 2022, The Leading body Housing
Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC Ltd) endorsed the proposition to
blend its auxiliaries and partners with HDFC Bank. According to the
declarations made by substances, HDFC Ltd and HDFC Bank will consolidate. One
element will be broken down as HDFC Ltd. After this declaration Offer Costs of
HDFC Bank Ltd and Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited Restricted
acquired the pace of 1656 rupees and 2680 rupees individually. As per HDFC
Bank, this consolidation needs to finish every one of the exchanges and
endorsements from legal specialists, different guidelines, investors, and
lenders under material regulations. In this way, as the intricacy engaged with
the [22]arrangement
and all auxiliaries of HDFC Ltd will overlap into the HDFC bank that requires
numerous administrative authorizations. The consolidation will require 15 to
year and a half; this arrangement is probably going to be finished toward the
finish of 2023.
·
THE
REASON BEHIND THE MERGER
The merger of HDFC Limited and HDFC Bank has been in the works for
several years, but it was not finalized in 2015 due to regulatory restrictions.
However, on April 4, 2023, the HDFC Board announced that the two companies will
enter into an agreement under which the parent company will transfer a portion
of its loans to the bank every quarter. This will make HDFC Bank the sole
provider of home loans for HDFC Limited customers.
One reason for the merger is that RBI has been
pushing NBFCs to operate more like banks. This includes requiring them to hold
reserves against their assets and liabilities, similar to banks. Additionally,
NBFCs are now required to have a broader base of liabilities. As a result, some
NBFCs have found it difficult to operate under these new regulations, which has
led to mergers with banks.
Another reason for the merger is that HDFC
Bank, while a strong private sector lender, has been weak in the mortgage
lending space. In 2021, only about 6.2% of HDFC Bank's loan book consisted of
home loans, and another 4.5% consisted of loans against property. These types
of loans are considered sticky assets, meaning that once a customer acquires a
home loan from a bank, they are more likely to stay with that bank for 15-20
years. The merger will allow HDFC Bank to gain access to the large customer
base of HDFC Limited, which will give it a stronger presence in the mortgage
lending market. This is important because mortgages are a sticky asset that can
help to retain customers. The merger will also make HDFC Bank a more formidable
competitor in the overall banking market.
Overall, the merger of HDFC Limited and HDFC
Bank is a positive development that is expected to benefit both companies and
their customers. The merger will make HDFC Bank a more diversified and stronger
institution, and it will give it a larger share of the lucrative mortgage
lending market.
·
HOW
IS THE MERGER BENEFICIAL TO BOTH?
This consolidation might lessen the extent of unstable advances
given by HDFC Bank. The consolidation of HDFC Ltd and HDFC Bank Ltd will be
advantageous for the two substances. The blend of the two substances gives
solidarity to HDFC Bank by adding to the ruling place of HDFC Ltd in the housing
finance area.
By working on the versatility, conveyance, and strategically pitch
of items (like housing money and banking). The declaration of this
consolidation gives a positive effect on share costs and this shows that
individuals have a faith in this consolidation to contribute.
It will assist the organization with expanding productivity. Since
the 2018 Foundation Renting and Monetary Administrations (IL&FS) emergency
RBI pushing (NBFCs) to fill in as a bank, subsequently this consolidation
became important to HDFC ltd and give a benefit over the opposition.
Working a non-banking monetary organization (NBFC) with around a net
Deal turnover of 50 crores turns into a test and by this consolidation, HDFC
Bank will find support to construct its housing credit portfolio. By adding to
this HDFC Bank gets areas of strength for an in the housing market which
furnishes a got resource class with generally safe.
Generally speaking this consolidation will become helpful for both
the substances by making expanded scale, exhaustive item offering, accounting
report flexibility, and the capacity to drive cooperative energies across
income open doors, working efficiencies, and endorsing efficiencies. For the
HDFC Bank piece of home credits expanded from 11% to 33% in its total book.
This would make HDFC India's second biggest bank.
POST-MERGER INTEGRATION CHALLENGES
·
EFFECTS ON SHAREHOLDERS
The merger between HDFC Limited and HDFC Bank
will have several effects on stakeholders. Firstly, Sashidhar Jagdishan, the
CEO of HDFC Bank, will lead the merged entity. After the merger, the subsidiary
or associates of HDFC Limited will be transferred to HDFC Bank. As a result,
HDFC Limited's shareholding in HDFC Bank will be completely lost, and HDFC Bank
will be fully owned by public shareholders. Existing shareholders of HDFC
Limited will receive 41% shares in HDFC Bank. Moreover, the diversified
structure of the merged entity will help mitigate risks associated with
specific loan segments such as agriculture loans or loans to micro, small, and
medium enterprises. Therefore, any issues in these segments are less likely to
impact the overall asset quality after the merger.
·
COST EFFECTIVENESS OR
NOT?
The merger between HDFC Limited and HDFC Bank is
expected to bring long-term benefits. It will result in cost-effectiveness, reducing
the cost of pricing, running the business, and operations. However, achieving
operational efficiency will take time.
Initially, the merger may lead to a rise in the
cost of statutory reserves, and the combination of a slightly low-yielding
housing finance book with a loan book may impact HDFC Bank's net interest
margin.
According to Fitch ratings, the proposed merger
is advantageous for both HDFC entities. HDFC Bank will gain around 500 new
branches, increasing its operating efficiency. Currently, HDFC Limited has a
cost-to-income ratio of 10%, while HDFC Bank's ratio stands at 36%. After the
merger, operational effectiveness is expected to improve.
·
EFFECT ON SHARE PRICE:
The announcement of the proposed merger between HDFC Limited and
HDFC Bank resulted in a significant increase in their share prices, rising by
over 7% in early trading hours. This merger has the potential to create India's
third-largest company based on market capitalization, following Reliance
Industries and TCS.
·
EFFECT ON BORROWERS AND
DEPOSITORS:
Customers of HDFC Bank are unlikely to experience any significant
changes as the proposed entity will be that of HDFC Bank itself. However,
customers of HDFC Limited may see revisions in interest rates on home loans. HDFC
Bank may also require HDFC Limited customers to update their KYC details and
provide new NACH mandates, particularly for those making loan repayments
through post-dated cheques. HDFC Chairman Deepak Parekh believes that the
merger will benefit customers by strengthening the combined entity, making
mortgage offerings more competitive.
·
IMPACT ON PUBLIC SECTOR
BANKS:
The ongoing merger of HDFC Limited with HDFC Bank will further
intensify the competition faced by public sector banks from private sector banks.
Private sector banks have been steadily gaining market share over the years.
The merger will reduce the difference between the loan books of State Bank of
India (SBI) and HDFC Bank, potentially impacting SBI's market share. In the
long run, private sector banks may surpass SBI in terms of market share. SBI
will need to improve its efficiencies, focus on increasing market share, and
enhance profitability to maintain its position as the leading public sector
bank. The successful integration of HDFC
Bank and HDFC Limited requires addressing the identified challenges
comprehensively. By focusing on cultural integration, harmonizing systems and
processes, retaining talent, effective communication, and achieving planned
synergies, the merged entity can realize its strategic objectives while
ensuring minimal disruption to stakeholders. Continuous monitoring and
adjustment will be essential throughout the integration process.[23]
CASE STUDY III: THE ZEE-SONY
MERGER
FACTS AND BACKGROUND
While industry investigators conjecture that
the consolidation might actually emerge inside the following 2 to 90 days, the
course of events stays subject to different variables, presenting a component
of vulnerability. In the unique scene of consolidations and acquisitions,
expectation is met with alert. [24]The
seeds of this organization were planted back in 2021 when both amusement
juggernauts, Sony and Zee, produced a consent to pool their mastery,
computerized resources, and broad organizations. With this aggressive
arrangement, another part in media outlets appears to be unavoidable.
Under the provisions of this essential
arrangement, the Sony bunch stands ready to guarantee a controlling stake of
roughly 51% in the beginning substance. In the meantime, the pioneers behind
Zee are set to hold a striking 4% offer. The excess value will be nicely
distributed among the current investors of Zee, taking into consideration an
expanded possession structure intelligent of the organization's underlying
foundations. This consolidation is a crossroads of vital importance, offering
complex benefits for the new combination. By synergizing their [25]assets,
these organizations expect to brace their strategic advantage on the lookout.
This huge achievement is presently ruined by the legitimate snags that have
raised critical worries.
·
PARTIES
TO THE DEAL
Zee Telefilms:
Zee was launched as Zee Telefilms in December
1991, then in 1999 it launched a Nickelodeon-branded programming block which
was a part of their deal with Viacom International. Zee Telefilms acquired 51%
and 50% stakes in ETC Networks and Taj television by the end of 2006. In the
same year, it was renamed as Zee Entertainment Enterprises. In 2008, Zee Motion
Pictures and Zee Studios (then Zee Limelight) were launched, which were an
attempt to develop, produce and market films in different Indian languages
including Hindi, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu etc.
Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt Ltd :
Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt Ltd. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sony
Group Corporation which was founded on 18th September, 1995 as Sony
Entertainment Television India private limited whose first channel which was
launched was Sony Entertainment Television. Sony Max, being the second channel
to be launched, broadcasted Hindi movies and sports events. In 2005, it bought
SAB TV and rebranded it as Sony SAB. In the following year, the English movie
channel Sony Pix was launched. In December 2015, the company was rebranded as
Sony Pictures Networks India (SPNI).[26]
ANALYSIS
The proposed merger between ZEE and SPN, two of India's leading
media and entertainment conglomerates, has been a tale of twists and turns,
navigating legal challenges, navigating stakeholder concerns, and ultimately,
forging a path towards a unified entity poised to redefine the industry
landscape.
·
Why the Merger: The Driving Forces: The
merger between ZEE and SPN is rooted in a convergence of factors that have
shaped the dynamics of the media and entertainment industry in India. The rapid
evolution of consumer preferences, the emergence of digital platforms, and the
growing demand for high-quality content have all propelled the need for
consolidation and strategic partnerships among industry players.
This
merger presents an opportunity for ZEE and SPN to leverage their complementary
strengths and create a powerhouse in the Indian media and entertainment
landscape. ZEE's dominance in news and entertainment, coupled with SPN's
prowess in movies and sports, presents a synergistic [27]blend
that can cater to the diverse tastes and preferences of Indian audiences.
·
Navigating
the Complexities of Corporate Law: The
path towards a united ZEE-SPN has been punctuated by legal challenges that have
tested the resolve of both companies. In February 2022, IndusInd Bank initiated
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proceedings (CIRP) against ZEE, citing a
financial debt of over Rs. 90 crore. This move threatened to derail the merger
plans and cast a shadow over ZEE's financial stability.[28]
The
CIRP proceedings underwent a series of legal twists and turns, with the NCLT
(National Company Law Tribunal) initially approving the CIRP and then staying
it. The NCLAT (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal) intervened, terminating
the CIRP and paving the way for the merger to proceed. Amidst these
legal battles, the merger also faced objections from some creditors who
questioned the fairness of the deal. However, the NCLT dismissed these
objections, affirming the merger's viability.[29]
·
Impact
on the Industry: A Shift in the Media Landscape: The completion of the ZEE-SPN merger will undoubtedly reshape the
Indian media and entertainment industry, creating a formidable competitor that
can rival the likes of Disney+ Hot star, Amazon Prime Video, and Netflix. This
consolidation will undoubtedly lead to a more competitive landscape, driving
innovation and raising the bar for content quality.
The
merger will also open up avenues for cross-promotion and collaboration between
ZEE and SPN's various platforms and properties, expanding the reach of their
content and enhancing consumer engagement.
·
Benefits
for Both Companies: Synergies and Strategic Advantages: The combined entity will benefit from a broader audience reach, a
wider range of content offerings, and a stronger financial position. Synergies
will be achieved through cost optimization, efficient resource allocation, and
cross-pollination of ideas and expertise. The merger will also enhance ZEE and
SPN's competitive edge in the digital media space, allowing them to capitalize
on the growing demand for streaming services and on-demand content.
The ZEE-SPN merger is not just a strategic move for two companies; it's an industry game-changer. It will foster innovation, drive investment, and raise the overall quality of content production. The merger will also create new employment opportunities and boost the economic contribution of the media and entertainment sector.[30]
The ZEE-SPN merger is not just a strategic move for two companies; it's an industry game-changer. It will foster innovation, drive investment, and raise the overall quality of content production. The merger will also create new employment opportunities and boost the economic contribution of the media and entertainment sector.[30]
The
successful completion of the ZEE-SPN merger marks a pivotal moment in the
Indian media and entertainment industry. The combined entity, poised to become
a global media powerhouse, will undoubtedly reshape the landscape, driving innovation, enhancing consumer experience, and
contributing to the economic growth of the country. [31]As the industry embraces this new era of consolidation and
strategic partnerships, the ZEE-SPN merger stands as a testament to the power
of collaboration and the pursuit of excellence in the ever-evolving world of
media and entertainment.[32]
POST-MERGER INTEGRATION CHALLENGES
The proposed merger between Sony and Zee
Entertainment Enterprises (Zee) has the potential to create a global media and
entertainment powerhouse. However, the deal also faces a number of challenges
that will need to be addressed in order to ensure a successful integration.
Post-merger integration challenges: One of the biggest challenges will be
integrating two very different cultures and corporate structures. Sony is a
Japanese multinational corporation with a long history of innovation and
quality control, while Zee is an Indian entertainment company with a focus on
local content and audience preferences. Finding a way to bridge the gap between
these two cultures will be essential for the success of the merger. Another
challenge will be integrating the two companies' IT systems and infrastructure.
Sony and Zee have different IT systems and processes, and these will need to be
standardized in order to ensure seamless communication and data sharing. This
could be a complex and time-consuming process, as it will require careful
planning and execution. In addition, the merger will need to be approved by
various regulatory bodies, including the Competition Commission of India (CCI).
The CCI will need to be satisfied that the [33]merger
does not create a monopoly in the Indian media and entertainment market.
Strategies to overcome challenges: To overcome these challenges, the merged
units will need to employ a number of strategies. These include:
·
Establishing a strong
leadership team: The merged company will need to have a strong leadership
team that is committed to the success of the merger and has the skills and
experience to navigate the integration process.
·
Communicating effectively: Open
and transparent communication is essential for building trust and ensuring that
all stakeholders are kept informed about the progress of the merger.
·
Addressing cultural
differences: Sensitizing employees to the different cultures involved will
help to mitigate any potential conflicts and ensure a smooth transition.
·
Standardizing IT systems: A
phased approach to IT integration will minimize disruption and ensure that the
new systems are fully functional before the merger is completed.
·
Gaining regulatory approvals: Working
closely with the CCI and other regulatory bodies will help to expedite the
approval process and ensure that the merger is completed on time.
By addressing
these challenges proactively, the merged units can increase their chances of a
successful integration and create a world-leading media and entertainment
company.[34]
CONCLUSION
Indian corporate enterprises have undergone a significant
transformation and structural change following the economic reforms of 1991.
This has been driven by the need to globalize, compete, and achieve economies
of scale and scope. Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have played a major
role in this transformation, as they have allowed companies to expand into new
markets, acquire new technologies, and gain access to new skills and
competencies.
The Indian economy is currently at a crossroads. On the one hand,
the country has a large and growing market, a young and increasingly educated
workforce, and a supportive government. On the other hand, the country faces
challenges such as poverty, corruption, and infrastructure bottlenecks.
M&A activity is likely to continue to play a major role in
India's economic development. However, companies need to be careful when
selecting targets and integrating acquisitions. They also need to be aware of
the regulatory and political landscape, as well as the social and environmental
consequences of their actions.
Overall, M&A activity has been a key
driver of India's economic growth and transformation in the post-reform era.
However, companies need to be strategic and responsible in their approach to
M&A to ensure that it continues to deliver benefits for all stakeholders.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
·
Bhalla, P. (2014). Mergers & Acquisitions in India: A
sectoral analysis. International Journal of Business and Economic Development
(IJBED), 2(2).
·
Sinha, P., & Gupta, S. (2011). Mergers and Acquisitions:
A pre-post analysis for the Indian financial services sector.
·
Kar, R. N., &Soni, A. (2008). Mergers and acquisitions in
India: A strategic impact analysis for the corporate enterprises in the post
liberalisation period. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
·
KUMAR, A. (2015). Merger and Acquisitions in India: Economics
of Overseas Deals by Indian Companies. Studies in Humanities and Social
Sciences, 13(2).
·
Stahl, G. K., & Voigt, A. (2008). Do cultural differences
matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model and examination.
Organization science, 19(1), 160-176.
·
Sarkar, A (2018), ‘Acquisition of Flipkart by Walmart: A
Process of Transforming Retail’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 53, No.
26-27, June.
·
Sumit Chakroborty (2017). Flipkart Story a timeline of
funding from 2007 to 2017.
·
Singh, R and M. Kasi, Advertising Strategies of Flipkart and
their Effects on Students of BHU, project report, BHU.
·
Vanitha, S. (2006). Mergers & Acquisitions in the
Manufacturing sector: An Evaluation Study. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bharathidasan
University, Tiruchirappalli.
·
Yusuf, A. K. Al-Hroot. (2015). Pre and Post-Merger Impact on Financial
Performance: A Case Study of
Jordan Ahli bank. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(36).
·
Handbook of mergers and acquisitions, edited by D. Faulkner,
S. Teerkangas, and R. Joseph (pp. 40–70). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
·
M. Shaven and H. G. Brakeman (2018). The importance of
organizational restructuring in maximizing the benefits of acquisitions. The
Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 696-722.
[1] Bhalla, P. (2014). Mergers & Acquisitions in India: A sectoral
analysis. International Journal of Business and Economic Development (IJBED),
2(2).
[2] Sinha, P., & Gupta, S. (2011). Mergers and Acquisitions: A
pre-post analysis for the Indian financial services sector.
[3] Kar, R. N., &Soni, A. (2008). Mergers and acquisitions in
India: A strategic impact analysis for the corporate enterprises in the post
liberalisation period. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
[4] KUMAR, A. (2015). Merger and Acquisitions in India: Economics of
Overseas Deals by Indian Companies. Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences,
13(2).
[5] Stahl, G. K., & Voigt, A. (2008). Do cultural differences
matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model and examination.
Organization science, 19(1), 160-176.
[6] Mukul. P. (2018). How Walmart’s acquisition of Flipkart may impact
the Indian e-tail market. Indian Express. Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/explained
/how-walmarts-acquisition-of-flipkart-may-impact-theindian-e-tail-market-5170569/.
10.05.2018
[7] Sarkar, A (2018), ‘Acquisition of Flipkart by Walmart: A Process of
Transforming Retail’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 53, No. 26-27, June.
[8] Sarkar, A (2018). Acquisition of Flipkart by Walmart: A Process of
Transforming Retail. Economic and Political Weekly, 53, 26-27.
[13] Competition Commission
of India (hereinafter, CCI), Order on Combination Registration No.
C-2018/05/571 (2018).
[14] Sarkar, A (2018), ‘Acquisition of Flipkart by Walmart: A Process of
Transforming Retail’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 53, No. 26-27, June.
[17] Singh, R and M. Kasi, Advertising Strategies of Flipkart and their
Effects on Students of BHU, project report, BHU.
[18] Walmart, Walmart to
Invest in Flipkart Group India’s Innovative E-commerce
Company (2018), https://news.walmart.com/2018/05/09/walmart-to-invest-in-flipkart-group-indias-innovative-ecommerce-company.
[19] Vanitha, S. (2006). Mergers & Acquisitions in the Manufacturing
sector: An Evaluation Study. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bharathidasan University,
Tiruchirappalli.
[20] https://www.hdfcbank.com/content/bbp/repositories/723fb80a-2dde-42a3-9793-7ae1be57c87f/?path=/Footer/About%20Us/News%20Room/Press%20Release/Content/2023/pdf/Press_Release_HDFC_Ltd_to_merge_into_HDFC_Bank_effective_July_1_2023.pdf.
[21] Devarajappa, S.
(2012). Mergers in Indian banks: A study on mergers of HDFC bank ltd and centurion bank of Punjab ltd. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services &
Management Research, 1(9).
[23] Yusuf, A. K. Al-Hroot. (2015). Pre and Post-Merger Impact on Financial
Performance: A Case Study of
Jordan Ahli bank. European Journal of Business and
Management, 7(36).
[25]https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/media/entertainment/sony-comes-to-zees-rescue-signs-term-sheet-for-merger-punit-goenka-to-remain-md-and-ceo-of-merged-entity/articleshow/86415933.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst.
[26] Business Today (2020). Why is SBI's market cap so low
compared to HDFC Bank? Check here. Business Today, Jul 17. Accessed online from:https://www.businesstoday.in/industry/banks/story/why-is-sbis-market-cap-so-less-compared-to-hdfc-bank-263324-2020-07-07
Chakravarty, M. (2016). Why the banks are in such a mess? The Mint, March 14.
[27] https://nclt.gov.in/gen_pdf.php?filepath=/Efile_Document/ncltdoc/casedoc/2709138081482022/04/Order-Challenge/04_order-Challange_004_1691750743105139567564d61157a7c97.pdf.
[28] The
Economic Times (2022). HDFC Bank reports a healthy balance sheet and showed
resilience, says CEO. Check here. The Economic Times, Jun 22. Accessed online
from
:https://bfsi.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/banking/hdfc-bank-reports-healthy-balance-sheet-showed-resilience-says-ceo/92385869.
[29] Bandelier, G. N.; Jaffe, J. F.; and Agrawal, A. (2018). Reexamining
an anomaly: The post-merger performance of acquiring corporations. 1605–1621 in
Journal of Finance, 47(4). S. Agarwal and S. Ramaswamy.
[30] Handbook of mergers and acquisitions, edited by D. Faulkner, S.
Teerkangas, and R. Joseph (pp. 40–70). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
[32] https://www.bqprime.com/business/sebi-confirms-order-barring-zees-subhash-chandra-punit-goenka-from-company-boards.
[33] M. Shaven and H. G. Brakeman (2018). The importance of
organizational restructuring in maximizing the benefits of acquisitions. The
Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 696-722.
Article Information
RECENT MERGERS IN INDIA
Authors: KHUSHI SINGH
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2023/11/21
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.