|
Aspect
|
Distance Learning
|
Traditional Learning
|
|
Flexibility
|
Flexibility in scheduling,
providing
a variety of lifestyle options.
|
It follows
strict schedules and
requires a physical presence.
|
|
Interaction
|
Lack of face-to-face interaction,
which may have an impact
on the
ability to interact with
each other.
|
Fosters the
development of interpersonal skills through
direct
and in person communication.
|
|
Accessibility
|
Overcomes geographical barriers
|
Specifies
that, due to location constraints, persons who
cannot be present in person shall not be
accommodated.
|
|
Technology Integration
|
It
promotes the development of
communication skills
by means of verbal and in person contact.
|
Compared to distance learning, it
includes technology but at a lesser level.
|
|
Cost
|
It
would be more
cost effective to
eliminate commuting and accommodation costs.
|
Traditional costs
consist of
commuting, accommodation and possibly higher tuition.
|
|
Social
Environment
|
Lack of a physical social
environment, which can
lead to feelings of
isolation.
|
Through face-to-face interaction and campus activities, they provide a stimulating
social
environment.
|
|
Learning
Environment
|
It offers a virtual learning
environment that is accessible from
anywhere via the Internet.
|
Provides a
physical learning environment within the limits of
the classroom or the campus.
|
|
Evaluation
Method
|
The use of online
assessments and remote
evaluations is often used.
|
In most
cases, it involves in
person examinations and evaluations.
|
|
Self-Discipline
|
To
manage time and comply with
schedule, it requires a high degree of discipline.
|
External discipline can be
provided by structured schedules in the traditional setting.
|
Authors: MS. SHREYA SAHU, MS. SHIVANGI SINHA
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.