Open Access Research Article
GENETIC PRIVACY AND DNA REGULATIONS INDIAS LANDSCAPE
Published Paper
Article Details
GENETIC PRIVACY AND DNA REGULATIONS: INDIA'S
LANDSCAPE[1]
AUTHORED
BY - AMOL YADAV
Abstract
This
research paper conducts a thorough examination of the intricate relationship
between genetic privacy and DNA regulations, recognizing the substantial value
inherent in genetic information. Genetic data divulges essential insights into
an individual's health, ancestry, and susceptibility to specific diseases. With
the rapid advancement of genetic testing and sequencing technologies, the paper
underscores the escalating concerns surrounding the safeguarding of this
sensitive information.
The
research delves comprehensively into multiple facets of genetic privacy,
encompassing legal and ethical dimensions, potential perils associated with
unauthorized access or misuse of genetic data, and the broad-ranging
consequences for individuals, families, and society at large. It scrutinizes
the existing regulatory frameworks governing DNA data, ranging from national
legislations to institutional policies. Moreover, the study scrutinizes the dynamic
landscape of DNA regulations, encompassing issues like consent requisites, data
sharing, storage protocols, and the establishment of DNA Data Banks. The study
also examines the impact of genetic information in diverse domains, such as law
enforcement, healthcare, and employment.
By
drawing from interdisciplinary perspectives spanning law, ethics, genetics, and
technology, this research critically evaluates the effectiveness and
sufficiency of current DNA regulations in preserving genetic privacy. It
accentuates potential gaps and hurdles necessitating resolution to ensure
robust protection of individuals' genetic information, while concurrently
accommodating societal interests like research advancement and public safety.
Furthermore, the paper explores emerging technologies, including genome editing
and direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and their implications for genetic
privacy and regulation. It dissects the ethical quandaries posed by these
innovations and offers insights into potential policy responses and governance
models.
In
summation, this research paper furnishes an all-encompassing overview of
genetic privacy and DNA regulations, illuminating the intricate complexities
and challenges intertwined with the preservation of genetic information. It
underscores the imperative for comprehensive legal and ethical frameworks that
harmonize the progression of genetic research with the preservation of
individual privacy rights.
Background
In
India, genetic privacy and DNA regulations have gained prominence due to the
sensitive nature of genetic information and its impact on individual privacy
and rights. The DNA Technology (Use and Application) Bill is the key
legislation governing these concerns. The bill underscores the significance of
obtaining consent for DNA sample collection, except in severe offense cases. It
also proposes the formation of a DNA Regulatory Board to oversee accreditation
of DNA laboratories, ensure adherence to quality standards, and implement data
protection protocols. Provisions for the removal of DNA profiles, including
those of suspects and undertrials, based on police reports, court orders, or
written requests are included in the bill. The legislation aims to strike a
balance between harnessing DNA technology for criminal investigations and
safeguarding individual privacy and rights, offering clear guidelines, consent
requirements, and oversight mechanisms.[2]
Genetics
is a branch of biology devoted to the study of genes, heredity, and variations
in living organisms. It investigates genes' structure, function, and
transmission, the fundamental units of heredity that transfer traits from
parents to offspring. Genes are segments of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) that
carry instructions for an organism's construction and maintenance. DNA, present
in the cells of all living beings, holds genetic information crucial for
organism development, operation, and reproduction.
Genetic
data comprises information derived from gene and variation studies. It
encompasses DNA gene sequences, the presence or absence of specific genetic
markers, and other data collected from individuals or populations. Genetic data
aids in understanding inherited traits, genetic disorders, evolutionary
relationships, and the influence of genetics on health and disease.[3]
Advancements like DNA sequencing have enabled the collection of extensive
genetic data from individuals. This data facilitates the identification of
genetic variations linked to specific traits or conditions, population genetics
research, and personalized medical treatments based on an individual's genetic
makeup. Handling genetic data with care is vital to address privacy, security,
and ethical concerns, as it contains sensitive information about individuals'
biological attributes and potential health risks.
Genetic data privacy and
operation of consumer genetic tests
Genetic
data privacy aims to prevent unauthorized access and use of an individual's
genetic information, especially in light of advances in science and technology
that make it easy to obtain and extract personal data from DNA samples. This
conflicts with individuals' privacy rights. The confidentiality of genetic
information is vital because it contains the blueprint for an individual's
physical and biological makeup. A person's gene sequence can potentially reveal
intimate details about their private life, even providing insights into their
future. Therefore, it is essential to protect an individual's privacy whenever
their genetic information is utilized, whether for research, medical purposes,
or any other reason.
Consumer
genetic tests, typically administered by healthcare professionals, involve DNA
sample collection, analysis, and result explanation. In contrast,
direct-to-consumer DNA tests (DTC) do not require consultation with healthcare
professionals. DTC companies offer genetic tests online, on television, or
through other channels. Customers provide a DNA sample, which the company
analyzes and sends results via email or regular mail. These tests assess the
risk of developing serious diseases based on an individual's genes or DNA.[4]
DTC genetic testing serves various purposes, including ancestry tracing and
identifying distant relatives. However, many individuals use DTC tests to check
for potential health issues.
How do companies handle genetic data obtained from consumers?
These
testing kit manufacturers should take effective precautions to protect the
database containing the genetic information because they are in possession of
their customers' highly confidential data. Because there is always a risk of a
hack or data breach, they should take the concerns about the security of the
genetic data of their customers extremely seriously. The majority of
customers who purchase direct-to-consumer DNA tests (DTC) consent to this
sharing of their personal information. These businesses only share data with
third parties with explicit permission. Companies always promise not to reveal
the identities of their users when information is given with their consent.
Privateer’s policies vary amongst businesses. To protect their privacy, the users
must read them before accepting them.[5]
Companies
that handle genetic data from consumers must prioritize stringent privacy and
security measures to safeguard the sensitive information they possess. This
entails addressing various aspects of data protection:
·
Informed Consent: Prior to
collecting genetic data, companies typically obtain informed consent from
consumers. This process ensures that consumers fully comprehend how their data
will be utilized, shared, and stored. It should offer clear information on
testing purposes, potential risks, benefits, and the implications of results.
·
Anonymization and De-identification:
To preserve privacy, genetic data is often anonymized or de-identified,
removing personally identifiable information (PII) like names and addresses.
This precaution prevents direct linkage of data to specific individuals.
·
Secure Data Storage:
Genetic data is securely stored in databases or servers with robust access
controls. Encryption, firewalls, and regular security audits are essential to
thwart unauthorized access, hacking, or data breaches.
·
Data Sharing and Consent Options:
Companies should provide consumers with choices regarding the sharing of their
genetic data. Some may opt for data use in research or sharing with third parties,
while others may demand strict limitations. Transparency in presenting these
options empowers consumers to make informed decisions.
·
Data Use and Sharing Policies:
Companies must maintain transparent policies detailing how genetic data is
employed and shared. These policies should clarify usage purposes (e.g.,
research, product development) and specify third-party recipients (e.g.,
research institutions, pharmaceutical firms). Furthermore, they should outline
procedures for consumers to opt out of data sharing if desired.
·
Regulatory Compliance:
Compliance with relevant privacy and data protection regulations is imperative.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union and the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United
States, among others, set forth guidelines governing the collection, storage,
and handling of personal and health-related data, including genetic
information.
Consumers
should diligently review a company's privacy policy and terms of service prior
to undergoing genetic testing to gain clarity on data handling practices. If
uncertainties persist, reaching out to the company directly to seek
clarification on data privacy and security practices is advisable. Companies
must be vigilant in upholding these measures to maintain trust and ensure the
confidentiality of consumers' genetic data.[6]
Effectiveness of
de-identification of genetic data
De-identification
stands as a pivotal process for safeguarding individual privacy, particularly
when it pertains to the use of genetic data in research. This method involves
removing certain identifiers, such as names and phone numbers, from the data to
protect the anonymity of participants in human trials. Genetic testing
companies routinely employ de-identification procedures to erase names, aiming
to ensure the confidentiality of genetic information. However, it's important
to acknowledge that complete de-identification may not provide an absolute
safeguard due to the distinct nature of each person's genetic data, which could
potentially be traced back to them, compromising their anonymity. Moreover,
when an individual's genetic information is utilized in research, there's often
a necessity to disclose some details about that individual, inadvertently
revealing their identity. Consequently, de-identification alone cannot
guarantee unwavering privacy protection.[7]
In
contrast to de-identification, the concept of re-identification poses a
significant threat to the privacy of genetic information. Researchers, through
specialized techniques, can re-identify individuals from data previously
assumed to be anonymised. This undermines the confidentiality of genetic data.
Nonetheless,
achieving complete de-identification of genetic data is a formidable challenge,
and the risk of re-identification or privacy breaches remains. Several
considerations shed light on the effectiveness of de-identification:
·
Genetic Identifiability:
Genetic data inherently contains unique information that may still be traceable
to an individual or their relatives even with personally identifiable
information (PII) removed. Various means, like cross-referencing with publicly
available databases or matching with familial genetic data, can facilitate
re-identification.
·
Auxiliary Data: De-identified
genetic data can potentially be re-identified when combined with other
auxiliary data sources. Access to datasets containing genetic or biographical
information enables adversaries to correlate and re-identify individuals.
·
Data Aggregation: Combining
de-identified data from multiple sources increases the risk of
re-identification. As more data accumulates, the potential for patterns or
overlaps in the data rises, aiding attackers in linking de-identified records
to specific individuals.
·
Evolving Re-identification Techniques:
Re-identification methods continually evolve, with advances in data analysis
and genetics research potentially simplifying re-identification from
de-identified genetic data in the future.
·
Insider Threats and Data Breaches:
Despite robust de-identification practices, there's an enduring risk of insider
threats or data breaches that can compromise data privacy and security. This
underscores the necessity of stringent security measures and ongoing monitoring
to thwart unauthorized access.
While
de-identification serves as a valuable privacy measure, it is not foolproof.
Consequently, there's a growing recognition of the need for additional
safeguards, including stringent data access controls, encryption, and
comprehensive data sharing policies, to ensure the protection of individuals'
genetic data. Such multifaceted approaches are essential to mitigate the
evolving risks associated with genetic data privacy.
Concept of genetic privacy
Genetic
privacy encompasses an individual's right to maintain strict control over the
confidentiality and security of their genetic information. This ensures
protection from unauthorized access, usage, or disclosure without explicit
consent. The significance of genetic privacy arises from genetic data's
potential to reveal intimate health details, ancestry, disease susceptibility,
and even familial genetic traits. Genetic data's inherent identifiability, due
to unique genetic markers, poses re-identification risks despite
de-identification efforts, like removing personally identifiable information
(PII) to protect privacy.[8]
Establishing
robust safeguards and legal frameworks is essential to ensure genetic privacy.
This involves implementing informed consent procedures, transparent data
collection, storage, sharing guidelines, and fortified security measures
against unauthorized access and breaches. Existing regulatory frameworks, like
the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act (HIPAA), provide crucial directives for safeguarding
genetic privacy.[9]
Balancing
the benefits of genetic research and personalized healthcare with genetic
privacy preservation requires ongoing dialogue among individuals, researchers,
healthcare providers, and policymakers. Ethical considerations, informed
consent, data sharing practices, and transparency must be addressed. Upholding
genetic privacy safeguards individuals' rights and fosters trust in responsibly
using genetic data for scientific and healthcare advancements.
Genetic
privacy is a multifaceted concept that manifests differently in various
contexts:
·
Privacy in Research: Genomic research must navigate a delicate balance
between the need for extensive data sharing to advance scientific knowledge and
the imperative to safeguard the privacy of research participants, particularly
in identifiable populations or groups facing unique privacy challenges.
·
Privacy in the Clinic:
The widespread adoption of genomic testing in clinical settings has brought
about significant clinical benefits for patients but also introduced new
privacy concerns related to the misuse of genetic information.
·
Genetic Privacy in Society:
Genetic and genomic information plays a pivotal role in law enforcement, the
legal system, and forensic contexts, raising crucial questions about privacy
and security. Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) genetic testing has gained popularity,
resulting in vast databases of consumer genetic data with inadequate
regulation, thus heightening privacy concerns. Additionally, surreptitious DNA
testing poses privacy threats, and certain companies offer genetic analyses
from various biological samples without proper consent, further complicating
the landscape of genetic privacy.
In
essence, the multifaceted nature of genetic privacy underscores the need for
comprehensive safeguards, ethical considerations, and regulatory frameworks to
ensure the responsible use and protection of genetic data across various
domains.[10]
Genetic databases
Genetic
databases serve as vital repositories housing genetic information derived from
various sources like research studies, clinical genetic testing, and direct-to-consumer
genetic testing services. Their primary objective is to bolster genetics
research, foster the discovery of novel genetic variations, and offer insights
into genetic underpinnings of diverse traits, diseases, and conditions. These
databases are instrumental in advancing genetics research, personalized
medicine, and comprehending the genetic foundations of ailments. They empower
scientists and researchers to scrutinize extensive datasets, discern genetic
trends, and investigate correlations between genetic variants and particular
traits or maladies. Moreover, they contribute to the development of fresh
diagnostic tools, precise therapies, and targeted interventions.[11]
Nevertheless,
the utilization of genetic databases gives rise to pivotal ethical and privacy
concerns. Upholding individual consent, safeguarding data privacy, and
instituting secure data storage and sharing protocols are imperative for
maintaining public trust and thwarting unauthorized access or misappropriation
of genetic data. Regulatory frameworks, such as the GDPR and HIPAA, offer
directives for responsible genetic data collection, storage, and usage to
ensure privacy and safeguard individuals' rights.[12]
Uses of genetic
information
Genetic
information serves crucial roles in diverse fields, including healthcare,
research, forensics, and personalized services, with key applications including[13]:
·
Disease Diagnosis and Treatment:
Genetic information aids in diagnosing genetic disorders and tailoring
treatment plans. By identifying specific gene mutations or variations,
healthcare providers can make precise diagnoses, select optimal therapies, and
predict disease progression.
·
Precision Medicine: Precision medicine
customizes medical treatments based on genetic profiles. Analyzing genetic data
enables healthcare professionals to understand individuals' disease
susceptibilities, forecast treatment outcomes, and prescribe more effective,
less side-effect-prone treatments.
·
Genetic Counselling:
Genetic information guides genetic counselling, where experts advise
individuals and families on hereditary diseases and associated risks. Genetic
test results assist in risk assessment, family planning decisions, and emotional
support.
·
Research and Scientific Discoveries:
Genetic information fuels scientific research by uncovering genetic foundations
of traits, diseases, and population dynamics. Researchers analyze genetic data
to identify variations, explore gene-environment interactions, comprehend
disease origins, and develop potential treatments.
·
Ancestry and Genealogy:
Genetic testing and analysis reveal individuals' genetic lineage and ancestry.
Ancestry tests compare genetic markers to reference populations, unveiling ancestral
geographic origins and cultural ties.
·
Forensics and Identification:
Genetic data, especially DNA profiling, plays a vital role in forensics and
criminal justice. DNA samples are matched with databases to identify
individuals, establish connections in criminal cases, locate missing persons,
resolve paternity disputes, and identify disaster victims.
However,
the utilization of genetic information raises ethical and privacy concerns.
Preserving individuals' privacy, obtaining informed consent, and implementing
robust security measures are imperative to ensure responsible and ethical use
of genetic data.
Status of Genetic Privacy in India
The
Delhi High Court issued a landmark decision in 2018 against United India
Insurance Company's discrimination in health insurance based on the presumption
that a person's heart illness is caused by a hereditary disorder. Due to the
lack of appropriate genetic testing and reasonable differentiation, the court
ruled that this type of discrimination was illegal and violated the concept of
fair treatment under the law. The order was later partially overturned by the
Supreme Court. This demonstrates how urgently India needs legislation to outlaw
genetic discrimination. In a time when genetic testing is common, it is essential
to stop discrimination and guarantee "fair justice under the law".
Article
14 of the Constitution, which ensures equal treatment under the law, forbids
genetic discrimination. In the Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. v.
Union of India[14]
case, the Supreme Court of India unanimously declared the Right to Privacy to
be a Fundamental Right protected by Article 21. Genetic discrimination ought to
be viewed as an infringement on privacy rights since everyone's genome is a
subject of personal privacy. The Delhi High Court's decision has established a
precedent, and it is now up to the legislature to enact legislation that
fulfils the pledge to outlaw genetic discrimination. The majority of nations
currently have anti-genetic discrimination laws. For instance, the Genetic
Information Non-discrimination Act (GINA), passed in 2008 in the United States,
safeguards people from genetic discrimination in employment and healthcare.
GINA has some restrictions, though, as it doesn't cover things like housing,
mortgage financing, education, or other insurances like life, long-term care,
and disability. Guidelines for the use of genetic information for insurance
reasons have been adopted by the Council of Europe.[15]
The
recently passed "Genetic
Non-discrimination Act" in Canada forbids employers and insurers from
seeking DNA testing or results. Until 2019, insurers in the United Kingdom
voluntarily abide by a moratorium that was decided upon by the government and
the Association of British Insurers. Given the current state of the world,
India should not fall behind but rather develop its own legislation to enforce
the ban of genetic discrimination, using the best elements from around the
globe.
Recent Developments
In
a recent ruling of Aparna Ajinkya Firodia v. Ajinkya Arun Firodia[16],
the Supreme Court recognized the right of children to protect their genetic
information in DNA tests, stating that such tests should not be conducted
without their consent.
This
judgment was made in response to a petition filed by a man who questioned the
paternity of his second child, alleging his wife's involvement in an adulterous
relationship. Based on the specific circumstances of the case, the apex court
concluded that no negative assumptions could be made due to the mother's
refusal to subject the child to a paternity test.
"Children
have the right not to have their legitimacy questioned frivolously before a
Court of Law. This is an essential attribute of the right to privacy",
the bench of Justices V Ramasubramanian and B V Nagarathna observed.
The
court held that Genetic information holds deep personal significance, providing
valuable insights into an individual's core being. It empowers individuals to
make informed decisions regarding their health, privacy, and identity. In the context
of divorce proceedings, children possess the right to safeguard their genetic
information from DNA testing as an integral aspect of their fundamental right
to privacy. This right is explicitly protected under Article 21 of the Indian
Constitution.
It
is crucial that children are not made the focal point of disputes between
spouses. The recognition of privacy, autonomy, and identity rights is not
limited to the domestic sphere but also extends globally through the United
Nations' Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Convention acknowledges
individuals' ability, including children, to exercise control over their
personal boundaries and determine their identity in relation to others. It
emphasizes that children should not be deprived of this entitlement to shape
and comprehend their sense of self solely due to their status as children.
While
setting aside the order, the Apex Court bench made the following observations:
- In
divorce disputes, a small child's DNA test should not be routinely
ordered. Only in cases where there are no other ways to substantiate the
charges of adultery in a marriage dispute may DNA profiling be used as
proof.
- Only
where there is enough prima facie evidence to overcome the presumption
under Section 112 of the Evidence Act may DNA tests of children born
during the continuation of a legitimate marriage be ordered. A DNA test
cannot be ordered to refute the presumption under Section 112 of the
Evidence Act if no claim of non-access has been made.
- In a
case where the paternity of a kid is not directly in dispute but is purely
incidental to the action, a court would not be justified in mandating a
DNA test of a child.
- The
Court should not order a DNA test or another type of test to settle a
paternity dispute just because one or both of the parties has contested
the fact. The Court should order the parties to present evidence to
support or refute the paternity claim, and it should only order a DNA test
if it is impossible to make an inference from the information presented or
if there is no other way to settle the dispute. In other words, the Court
can only order such a test in rare and worthy circumstances where it
becomes necessary to do so in order to settle the dispute.
- When
ordering DNA tests to establish adultery, the court must take into account
the possible effects on the offspring, such as inheritance-related
repercussions, social stigma, etc.
DNA testing regulations
The
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashok Kumar v. Raj Gupta & Ors.[17]
laid in the judgment that, compelling an unwilling person to undergo a DNA test
would be a violation of his/her personal liberty and right to privacy.
17.
“……The appellant (plaintiff) as noted earlier, has brought on record the
evidence in his support which in his assessment adequately establishes his
case. His suit will succeed or fall with those evidence, subject of course to
the evidence adduced by the other side. When the plaintiff is unwilling to
subject himself to the DNA test, forcing him to undergo one would impinge on
his personal liberty and his right to privacy. Seen from this perspective, the
impugned judgment merits interference and is set aside.”
·
DNA Technology (Use and
Application) Regulation Bill
Union Minister of Science and Technology then, Dr.
Harsh Vardhan introduced “The DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation
Bill, 2019” in the Lok Sabha stating that this Bill was for the
regulation of use and application of DNA technology for the purpose
of establishing identity of missing persons, victims, offenders, under trials
and unknown deceased persons.
"The DNA
Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2019" was primarily
designed to increase the use of DNA-based forensic technologies to support and
strengthen the nation's justice delivery system. It is well acknowledged that
DNA-based technologies are useful for identifying missing people and solving
crimes and cases. The Bill aimed to ensure that with the proposed increased use
of this technology in this country, there is also the assurance that the DNA
test results are reliable and that the data remain protected from misuse or
abuse in terms of our citizens' privacy rights by requiring the mandatory
accreditation and regulation of DNA laboratories.[18]
The application of DNA evidence, which is regarded
as the gold standard in criminal investigations, will be made possible by the
proposed legislation, which will strengthen the criminal justice delivery
system. Forensic investigations will be aided by the creation of the National
and Regional DNA Data Banks as envisioned in the Bill. The proposed Bill will
encourage the creation of a consistent code of practises across all national
DNA testing laboratories. With the proper input from the DNA Regulatory Board,
which will be established for the purpose, this will help in the scientific
upgrading and streamlining of the nation's DNA testing activities. It is
anticipated that increased usage of this technological advancement led by
science will strengthen the current justice delivery system.[19]
·
Important Factors of the Bill
The Bill governs the use of DNA
technology to establish a person's identity for matters outlined in a Schedule.
This includes both civil (e.g., parentage issues, immigration, organ
transplantation) and criminal (e.g., Indian Penal Code, 1860 offenses) cases.
It also establishes national and regional DNA data banks, each maintaining
specific indices:
Ø Crime scene index
Ø Suspects' or undertrials' index
Ø Offenders' index
Ø Missing people' index
Ø Unknown deceased individuals' index
The Bill forms a DNA Regulatory Board, mandating
accreditation for DNA facilities conducting individual identification analysis.
It stipulates written consent for DNA collection, except for offenses with sentences
exceeding seven years or the death penalty. Provisions for undertrials, erasing
suspects' DNA profiles post-police report or court order, and profile deletion
upon written request are included.
The Bill sets regulations for DNA testing in
various specified matters, encompassing Indian Penal Code, 1860 offenses and
other laws like the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, Medical Termination
of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, and Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988. It allows DNA testing for civil matters such as parentage
disputes, pedigree matters, immigration or emigration cases, assisted
reproductive technologies, transplantation of human organs, and individual
identity establishment.
·
Key Issues
The Schedule in the Bill enumerates the types of
civil matters where DNA profiling can be utilized, specifically for
establishing individual identity. However, it remains uncertain whether the
Bill intends to regulate medical or research laboratories that conduct DNA
testing for identification purposes. In criminal investigations and cases
involving missing persons, the Bill mandates the consent of the individual for
DNA profiling. However, the requirements for obtaining consent in civil matters
are not explicitly stated.
DNA laboratories are obligated to share DNA data
with the DNA Data Banks. Yet, it remains unclear whether DNA profiles for civil
matters will also be stored in these Data Banks, raising concerns about
potential privacy violations. Under the Bill, DNA laboratories generate DNA
profiles, which are then shared with the DNA Data Banks. The process for
removing DNA profiles from the Data Banks is specified, but the Bill does not
impose an obligation on DNA laboratories to delete DNA profiles. It could be
argued that such provisions should be included in the Bill itself rather than
being left to regulations.
·
Consent for collecting bodily
substances
When
a person is detained for a crime that carries a potential sentence of seven
years, the government must get their written permission before taking their
bodily fluids. However, if the subject declines to comply, the authorities may
ask a magistrate for approval. If the Magistrate is confident that the DNA
analysis will support or refute the person's involvement in the alleged crime,
they may then order the collection of body materials. Contrarily, agreement is
not necessary if the crime involves a sentence of more than seven years in jail
or death.
Before
collecting body substances from a victim or a relative of a missing person, the
authorities must have their written agreement. The parent or legal guardian
must provide their written approval if the person is a minor or disabled. If
the person refuses, the authorities may go before a Magistrate, who has the power
to order the collection of the person's bodily fluids.
·
Removal of DNA profiles
On the basis of a written request by the person,
DNA profiles in the crime scene index or missing persons' index will be taken
out of the DNA Data Banks. After a police report has been filed or in
accordance with a court order, the DNA profile of a suspect will be
deleted. A court order will be used to delete the DNA profile in the
event of an undertrial.
·
DNA Regulatory Board
The Bill institutes a DNA Regulatory Board to
oversee DNA Data Banks and laboratories, chaired by the Department of
Biotechnology's Secretary as an ex-officio member. The Board comprises 12
additional members, including biological sciences experts, the Director General
of the National Investigation Agency, Directors of the Central Bureau of
Investigation, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, and Central
Forensic Science Laboratory, along with a member of the National Human Rights
Commission. The Board's primary functions encompass supervising DNA
laboratories and Data Banks, ensuring quality control, accrediting DNA
facilities, and creating training modules for DNA-related personnel.
Additionally, it offers recommendations to the central government on privacy
protection related to DNA sample use and analysis. Maintaining the
confidentiality of DNA profile information is of utmost importance to the
Board, mandating that all data held by Data Banks, laboratories, and relevant
entities remains confidential, with DNA data strictly limited to individual
identification.
Conclusion
In
conclusion, this research paper has explored the crucial and evolving topic of
genetic privacy and DNA regulations. The study has delved into the various
aspects surrounding the protection of genetic information, including the
potential risks, ethical considerations, and legal frameworks involved.
The
analysis has highlighted the importance of robust regulations to safeguard
genetic privacy, considering the sensitive nature of DNA data and its potential
implications for individuals and society. It has become evident that a balance
must be struck between the advancements in genetic research, which hold immense
potential for scientific and medical progress, and the protection of
individuals' privacy rights.
Through
an examination of existing DNA regulations and privacy frameworks, the research
has identified areas for improvement and suggested recommendations. These
include the need for comprehensive legislation addressing genetic privacy,
clear guidelines on consent and data sharing, stringent security measures for
DNA databases, and the establishment of independent regulatory bodies to
oversee genetic research and data handling.
Furthermore,
the study has emphasized the significance of public awareness and education
regarding genetic privacy, aiming to empower individuals to make informed
decisions about the use and sharing of their DNA information. Overall, the
research paper emphasizes the critical importance of genetic privacy in the era
of advancing genetic technologies. By addressing the regulatory gaps and
raising awareness, we can create a framework that protects individuals' privacy
rights, fosters trust in genetic research, and facilitates responsible and
ethical use of DNA data for the betterment of society.
[1] Authored by Amol Yadav, Jamia
Millia Islamia.
[2] Srivastava, Ankit, et al.
"Impact of DNA evidence in criminal justice system: Indian legislative
perspectives." Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 12.1
(2022): 51.
[3] Jana, Achin, and Kavita Singh.
"Forensic DNA Profiling In India: An Emerging Human Rights Hazard." Indian Journal 1.1 (2022): 22.
[4] Bondre, Ameya, Soumitra Pathare,
and John A. Naslund. "Protecting mental health data privacy in India: The
case of data linkage with Aadhaar." Global Health: Science and
Practice 9.3 (2021): 467-480.
[5] Graeme Laurie. Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal
Norms. 1st Ed. Cambridge University Press. 2002.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Garfinkel, Simson. De-identification
of Personal Information:. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, 2015.
[8] Supra note 2, at 2.
[9] Siddhant Gupta, Bagmisikha Puhan. Genetic privacy and the DNA regulation bill,
Lexology, 1st Mar. 2021, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a0ba5f39-930f-45a5-b02c-ebd1b72f3aa9.
Accessed on 21st Sept. 2023.
[10] Heather Widdows, Caroline Mullen. The Governance of Genetic Information: Who
Decides?. 1st Ed. Cambridge University Press. 2009.
[11] Bishop, Martin J. Genetic
databases. Academic Press, 1999.
[12] Clayton EW, Evans BJ, Hazel JW,
Rothstein MA. The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and
limitations. Journal Law Biosci. 14;6(1) (2019):1-36
[13] Hall, Mark A., and Stephen S.
Rich. "Laws restricting health insurers' use of genetic information:
impact on genetic discrimination." The American Journal of Human
Genetics 66.1 (2000): 293-307.
[14] (2017) 10 SCC 1
[15] Bondre, Ameya, Soumitra Pathare,
and John A. Naslund. "Protecting mental health data privacy in India: The
case of data linkage with Aadhaar." Global Health: Science and
Practice 9.3 (2021): 467-480.
[17] 2021 SCC OnLine SC 848
[18] Kansra, Deepa, et al. "The
DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2019: A Critical
Analysis." Indian Law Institute Law
Review (2021).
[19] Joh, Elizabeth E. "DNA theft:
recognizing the crime on nonconsensual genetic collection and
testing." BuL Rev. 91 (2011): 665.
Article Information
GENETIC PRIVACY AND DNA REGULATIONS INDIAS LANDSCAPE
Authors: AMOL YADAV
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2023/10/07
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.