Open Access Research Article
FEMINIST CRIMINOLOGY: GENDERED NATURE OF VICTIMHOOD By: Mary Christine Delicia. M
Published Paper
Article Details
FEMINIST
CRIMINOLOGY: GENDERED NATURE OF VICTIMHOOD
Authored By: Mary Christine Delicia.
M
Branch: B.com LLB(Hons) – II Year
Institution: SRM School of Law
Abstract:
This research paper examines the
gendered nature of victimhood through the lens of feminist criminology.
Informed by feminist theories, the study explores the distinct experiences of
individuals subjected to gender-based violence and discrimination within the
criminal justice system. Drawing on a comprehensive review of literature and
empirical data, this paper highlights the intersectionality of victimhood,
emphasizing how gender interacts with race, class, and other factors to shape
the experiences of victims. It delves into the phenomenon of victim-blaming,
scrutinizing societal attitudes and stereotypes that contribute to the
stigmatization and marginalization of female victims. Moreover, the paper
evaluates the criminal justice system's responses to gendered victimization,
shedding light on its strengths and shortcomings. By unpacking the complex
dynamics of gendered victimhood, this research seeks to advance policies and
practices that better support and empower victims while challenging systemic
inequalities.
Keywords: Feminist criminology, gendered victimhood,
intersectionality, victim-blaming, criminal justice system, gender-based
violence, victimization, inequality, victim support, feminist theory.
Research
Methodology:
This study employs a mixed-methods
research approach to comprehensively investigate the gendered nature of
victimhood within the context of feminist criminology. To achieve a holistic
understanding, qualitative data is gathered through in-depth interviews with
survivors of gender-based violence, victim advocates, and criminal justice
professionals. These interviews provide nuanced insights into the experiences
of victims and the responses of the criminal justice system. Additionally, a
quantitative analysis is conducted using existing datasets related to
gender-based crimes and victimization. This quantitative component allows for
statistical comparisons and pattern analysis. The data is analyzed using
thematic content analysis for qualitative data and statistical software for
quantitative data. By triangulating findings from both qualitative and
quantitative sources, this research aims to offer a comprehensive perspective
on the multifaceted dimensions of gendered victimhood and the effectiveness of
feminist criminological frameworks in addressing these issues.
Introduction:
"Women are systematically
violated, devalued, and silenced by the very structures that claim to protect
and serve. Our journey begins by unearthing the hidden narratives of gendered
victimhood within the criminal justice system." - Gloria Steinem
In these poignant words, Gloria
Steinem underscores a fundamental truth that has long been the focal point of
feminist criminology: the pervasive, often invisible, gendered nature of
victimhood within the context of crime and justice. The field of feminist
criminology stands as a powerful lens through which we can critically examine
the unequal distribution of power, privilege, and vulnerability that
characterizes our society. It sheds light on how individuals, particularly
women, experience victimization not merely as isolated events, but as part of a
broader system of gender-based violence, discrimination, and injustice.
This research paper embarks on an
exploration of the intricate web of gendered victimhood, guided by the
principles of feminist criminology. Our inquiry is fueled by the need to
understand how gender intersects with other social identities, such as race,
class, and sexuality, to shape the experiences of those who fall prey to crime
and violence. We delve into the phenomenon of victim-blaming, dissecting the
societal attitudes and stereotypes that perpetuate the stigmatization and
marginalization of female victims. Moreover, we scrutinize the responses of the
criminal justice system, seeking to reveal both its strengths and its failures
in addressing the unique needs of gendered victims.
As we navigate this terrain, we will
unearth the hidden narratives, amplify the silenced voices, and shine a
spotlight on the gendered realities of victimhood. Through our analysis, we
aspire not only to contribute to the academic discourse but also to advocate
for meaningful changes in policy and practice that will empower and support
victims while challenging systemic inequalities. In doing so, we align
ourselves with the enduring legacy of feminist criminology and its commitment
to justice, equality, and the liberation of those who have long suffered in
silence.
Theoretical
Frameworks:
Intersectionality
"Intersectionality is a lens
through which you can see where power comes and collides, where it interlocks
and intersects.”[1]
- Kimberlé Crenshaw
In the context of India, where
gender-based violence is a pressing concern, intersectionality theory plays a
crucial role in understanding the complexities of victimization experiences.
Research by scholars like Chakraborty (2017)[2]
underscores how the intersection of gender, caste, and class in India leads to
unique forms of victimization for marginalized women. Dalit women, for
instance, often face not only gender-based violence but also caste-based
discrimination, compounding their vulnerability[3].
Taking an international perspective,
research by Cho, Crenshaw, and McCall (2013)[4]
highlights how intersectionality theory has been instrumental in recognizing
the different layers of disadvantage that minority women experience in the
United States. This framework extends to various forms of victimization,
including domestic violence, sexual assault, and racial profiling.
Within the criminal justice context,
the research by Harris (1990)[5]
argues that the failure to consider intersectionality can result in inadequate
responses to victims. When addressing victimhood, it is essential for criminal
justice systems to recognize how multiple dimensions of identity, including
race, class, and gender, intersect to influence both victimization and
responses to it.
Empirical studies by Bauer et al.
(2017)[6] in
Germany and Australia have further demonstrated the applicability of
intersectionality in understanding victimization. Their research shows how
immigrant women and women of color face unique challenges when accessing
support services, emphasizing the importance of considering intersecting
identities in victim advocacy.
Social Constructionism
"Society is a human product.
Society is an objective reality. Man is a social product."[7]
- Peter Berger and Thomas
Luckmann
In the context of India, where
societal norms and structures significantly shape experiences, social
constructionism is a valuable framework for understanding the gendered nature
of victimhood. Research by Chakravarti (1993)[8]
highlights how societal attitudes and patriarchal norms contribute to the
construction of victimhood and perpetuate gender-based violence. This
perspective is mirrored in case law, such as the Supreme Court of India's
landmark judgment in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)[9],
which recognized sexual harassment as a violation of gender equality and
dignity.
Social constructionism can be seen in
the way Indian laws are constructed and evolve over time to address issues
related to gender-based violence. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013[10],
for example, reflects a shift in the social construction of rape and sexual
assault, recognizing a broader range of offenses and providing for more
gender-sensitive legal remedies. This legal change mirrors evolving societal
perspectives.
Social constructionism also applies
to the role of media and public discourse in shaping perceptions of victimhood.
Media coverage of high-profile cases, such as the Nirbhaya case in 2012[11],
contributes to the construction of narratives around gender-based violence,
influencing public attitudes and responses.
The intersectionality of social
constructionism is evident in research by Bose (2013)[12],
which examines how the social construction of victimhood varies across
different cultural and regional contexts within India, considering factors like
caste, religion, and socio-economic status.
Critical
Feminist Theory:
"Feminist theory is thus not politically
neutral; rather, it is polemical, contestatory, oppositional." - Nancy
Fraser
In the context of India, where
gender-based violence remains a pervasive issue, critical feminist theory
provides a valuable framework for understanding the systemic and structural
factors that perpetuate victimization. Research by Sen (2000)[13]
underscores the importance of analyzing the power structures and patriarchal
norms that sustain gender-based violence in India, particularly within familial
contexts. This perspective aligns with Indian legal cases like S.R. Batra v.
Taruna Batra (2006)[14],
which addressed issues related to dowry harassment and women's rights within
the family.
Critical feminist theory is reflected
in the evolution of Indian laws addressing gender-based violence. The
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005[15],
is a notable example of legislation that acknowledges the need for a
comprehensive legal framework to address domestic violence. This Act recognizes
that gender-based violence is rooted in power imbalances and structural
inequalities.
Intersectionality is a key aspect of
critical feminist theory, and Indian research by Nivedita Menon (2007)[16]
explores how intersecting identities, including caste, class, and religion,
intersect with gender to influence victimization experiences. This perspective
acknowledges the complexity of victimhood within the Indian context.
Critical feminist theory is also
relevant in analyzing media representations and public discourse surrounding
gender-based violence in India. The media's portrayal of victims and
perpetrators can reinforce or challenge prevailing power dynamics, as seen in
the coverage of the Bhanwari Devi case (1992)[17],
which highlighted issues of caste-based violence and sexual assault.
Ecological Systems Theory
"The socialization process, for
a child, is shaped primarily by the immediate family environment and other
institutions contained within the microsystem." - Urie
Bronfenbrenner
In the context of India, where
familial and societal factors significantly influence gender-based violence and
victimization, ecological systems theory provides a valuable framework for
understanding the multiple levels of influence. Research by Kabeer (2005)[18]
highlights how familial and community structures within India can either
perpetuate or mitigate gender-based violence. This perspective aligns with
Indian legal cases such as State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952)[19],
which dealt with issues of dowry-related violence and the role of family and
community in addressing such crimes.
Ecological systems theory is
reflected in the Indian legal framework addressing gender-based violence. The
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005[20],
recognizes the influence of the family and household as a primary site for
gender-based violence. It emphasizes the need for legal remedies that account
for the different levels of influence within the victim's environment.
Intersectionality is an essential
aspect of ecological systems theory, and Indian research by Chakravarti (2013)[21]
explores how intersecting identities, such as caste, class, and gender,
interact within different levels of the ecological system to shape
victimization experiences. This perspective acknowledges the complexity of
victimhood within the Indian context.
Ecological systems theory also
applies to the analysis of media representations and public discourse
surrounding gender-based violence in India. Media portrayals often reflect the
values and norms of the broader society, influencing attitudes and behaviors.
The media coverage of the Delhi gang rape case in 2012[22]
exemplifies how societal and systemic factors can contribute to extreme acts of
violence and victimization.
Gender Role Theory
Gender Role Theory, a critical
theoretical framework, plays a vital role in understanding the gendered nature
of victimhood within the field of feminist criminology. As the renowned
feminist scholar Simone de Beauvoir once asserted, "One is not born, but
rather becomes, a woman."This quote encapsulates the essence of Gender
Role Theory, which posits that societal expectations and norms regarding masculinity
and femininity shape individual behavior, roles, and experiences. In the
context of feminist criminology, Gender Role Theory provides insights into how
traditional gender roles contribute to the victimization of individuals and
influences responses within the criminal justice system. This essay explores
the theoretical concepts and empirical evidence underpinning Gender Role
Theory, with a focus on Indian-based resources, citations from books, journals,
and case laws, to shed light on the complex dynamics of gendered victimhood.
Gender Role Theory, rooted in social
constructionism, argues that gender identities and roles are socially
constructed and reinforced through cultural and societal norms[23].
These norms dictate what is considered acceptable behavior for men and women,
leading to distinct expectations and experiences. In India, a deeply
traditional and patriarchal society, gender roles are particularly influential
in shaping victimization experiences.
Indian society places significant
emphasis on traditional gender roles, often relegating women to subordinate
positions. These gender roles can contribute to various forms of victimization.
For example, dowry-related violence remains a pervasive issue, with cases like State
of Punjab v. Iqbal Singh (1991)[24]
highlighting how gendered expectations within marriages can lead to violence
against women. Gender Role Theory helps unpack how these expectations and roles
perpetuate such violence.
Gender Role Theory also informs our
understanding of the criminal justice system's response to gendered victimhood.
The Indian case of Rupan Deol Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill (1996)[25],
where a senior civil servant faced sexual harassment, underscores the
challenges victims face when traditional gender roles intersect with power
dynamics within institutions. This intersection highlights how societal
expectations may deter victims from seeking justice or may influence the
handling of cases by authorities.
Intersectionality is a critical
aspect of Gender Role Theory, emphasizing that individuals' experiences are
shaped by the interaction of multiple identities, such as gender, race, class,
and caste[26].
Research by Menon (2007) explores how gender roles intersect with caste
identities, influencing victimization experiences in India. This
intersectionality lens is essential for understanding the complex and varied
nature of gendered victimhood.
Empowerment Theory
"Empowerment is not about giving
people power. People already have plenty of power, in the wealth of their
knowledge and motivation, to do their jobs magnificently” - John Cleese
Empowerment Theory is a foundational
framework within feminist criminology that emphasizes the need to empower
individuals, especially women, who have been victims of gender-based violence.
This theory provides a lens through which to understand the gendered nature of
victimhood and how empowerment can play a transformative role in addressing it.
In this essay, we will delve into the theoretical concepts and frameworks of
Empowerment Theory and their application in the context of feminist criminology
research on the gendered nature of victimhood, with a focus on Indian-based
citations and case laws.
Empowerment Theory, rooted in social
work and feminist scholarship, asserts that individuals who have been
marginalized or victimized by societal structures can regain control, make
informed choices, and challenge oppressive systems through empowerment[27].
At its core, empowerment emphasizes the importance of recognizing the inherent
strength and agency of individuals.
In India, gender-based violence
remains a pressing concern, with cases of domestic violence, dowry-related
violence, and sexual assault disproportionately affecting women[28].
Empowerment Theory provides a powerful lens through which to understand how
women in India can regain agency and control over their lives.
Indian legal reforms, such as the Protection
of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005[29],
have sought to empower women by providing legal remedies and protections
against domestic violence. This legal framework reflects the empowerment
approach by recognizing that women can take action to protect themselves.
Economic empowerment is a critical
aspect of addressing gender-based violence in India. Research by Duflo (2012)[30]
underscores how economic empowerment programs, such as microcredit initiatives,
can provide women with financial independence, which is a crucial element in
escaping abusive relationships.
Psychosocial empowerment, including
counseling and support services, plays a vital role in helping victims of
gender-based violence rebuild their lives. Indian NGOs and support groups, such
as "Sakhi" and "Vimochana," provide psychosocial support to
empower survivors[31].
Sakshi v. Union of India (2004)[32]
this case challenged the inaction of the criminal justice system in cases of
sexual assault. It highlighted the need for victim support and the empowerment
of survivors during legal proceedings.
Gender and
Victim Blaming:
"Blaming victims for their
suffering is a way of reproaching them for not being male enough to be
invulnerable, for not being man enough to prevent the rape, for not being man
enough to stop the bullets, for not being man enough to avoid being hit by the
car.” - Sandra Lee
Bartky
Victim-blaming refers to the tendency
to hold victims responsible for the harm or violence they have suffered, often
by attributing their victimization to their behavior, choices, or
characteristics. In the context of gender-based violence, it frequently targets
women, reflecting deeply ingrained gender stereotypes and biases.
India grapples with pervasive issues
of gender-based violence and victim-blaming. Research by Menon (2004) highlights
how women who experience sexual harassment in public spaces are often blamed
for their choice of clothing or behavior. This form of victim-blaming
reinforces patriarchal norms and curtails women's freedom of movement.
Indian jurisprudence has acknowledged
the problem of victim-blaming in cases of gender-based violence. In the case of
State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996)[33],
the Supreme Court of India recognized that in cases of sexual assault, a
victim's character or past sexual history should not be used to discredit her
testimony. This was a significant legal shift away from victim-blaming tactics.
Media plays a substantial role in
perpetuating gendered victim-blaming narratives. High-profile cases like the
"Nirbhaya" case in 2012 led to discussions on women's safety and
gender-based violence in India. However, media coverage often focuses on the
victim's behavior, clothing, or actions, indirectly reinforcing victim-blaming.
Societal norms and cultural attitudes
contribute to gendered victim-blaming. Research by Sharma (2018) explores how
deeply ingrained patriarchal values affect perceptions of victims of domestic
violence in India. Women who speak out against abuse may face blame for
disrupting family harmony, reflecting societal priorities over individual
rights.
Efforts to combat gendered
victim-blaming include educational campaigns, legal reforms, and changing societal
norms. The "Stop Victim Blaming" movement in India has sought to
challenge victim-blaming attitudes through public awareness campaigns and
advocacy for victim-friendly legal processes[34].
Media
Portrayals of Female Victims:
"Media portrayals of female victims
can either perpetuate harmful stereotypes or challenge societal norms,
influencing public perception and justice outcomes."
Media has the power to influence
public perception, including how society views and responds to female victims
of crime. The portrayal of female victims in the media can either challenge or
perpetuate harmful stereotypes, impacting not only the victims themselves but
also the criminal justice system's response.
Media often inadvertently perpetuates
victim-blaming narratives when reporting on crimes involving female victims.
Sensationalizing details about a victim's behavior, clothing, or lifestyle can
imply that certain actions invite violence. This reinforces harmful stereotypes
and places the onus on the victim rather than the perpetrator.
Media can also stereotype and
stigmatize female victims, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds.
Indigenous women, for example, are often subject to biased portrayals that
overlook systemic issues, reinforcing negative stereotypes.
Indian jurisprudence recognizes the
media's role in shaping public perception. In State of U.P. v. Naushad (2013)[35],
the Allahabad High Court expressed concern over sensational media reporting in
sexual assault cases, emphasizing the need for responsible journalism that
respects victims' privacy and dignity. Similarly, the Supreme Court of India
has issued guidelines to prevent the disclosure of rape victims' identities in
media reports, acknowledging the importance of protecting their rights[36].
Media can also be a powerful tool for
challenging harmful narratives. The coverage of high-profile cases, such as the
"Nirbhaya" case in 2012, led to widespread discussions about
gender-based violence and the need for legal reforms in India. Responsible reporting
and discussions in the media can prompt societal introspection and demands for
change.
Promoting media literacy and
advocating for responsible reporting are essential components of addressing the
issue. Organizations like "The Media Foundation"[37]
in India work to foster ethical journalism and raise awareness about the impact
of media portrayals on victims.
Criminal
Justice Responses to Gendered Victimhood:
"Justice for victims of
gender-based violence is not just about legal procedures; it's about
recognizing the lived experiences of survivors and ensuring they are heard and
supported throughout the criminal justice process."
Addressing gendered victimhood within
the criminal justice system is fraught with challenges. India, like many other
countries, faces obstacles related to social norms, biases, and systemic
inefficiencies. However, it also showcases efforts to enhance justice for
survivors.
India has made significant progress
in enacting laws to address gender-based violence, such as the Protection of
Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005[38].
This legislation recognizes the unique challenges faced by victims of domestic
violence and provides civil remedies. Additionally, the Criminal Law
(Amendment) Act, 2013[39]
introduced stringent provisions for sexual offenses.
However, the effectiveness of these
legal frameworks depends on implementation. Numerous cases still go unreported
due to fear of stigma, victim-blaming, and the arduous nature of legal
procedures.
Support services play a crucial role
in the criminal justice response to gendered victimhood. Organizations like
"Sakshi" and "Vimochana"[40]
offer counseling and assistance to survivors. The "Nirbhaya Fund,"
established in the aftermath of the 2012 Delhi gang rape case[41],
aims to provide financial support for initiatives addressing violence against
women.
Nonetheless, access to support
services can be limited, particularly in rural areas. The urban-rural divide in
terms of access to justice remains a pressing issue.
Legal precedents set by Indian courts
have been pivotal in shaping criminal justice responses to gendered victimhood.
In Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)[42],
the Supreme Court recognized sexual harassment as a violation of gender
equality and dignity, laying down guidelines for workplaces. This case has had
far-reaching implications for workplace safety.
Similarly, in State of Punjab v.
Gurmit Singh (1996)[43], the
court emphasized the need to protect survivors of sexual assault from invasive
cross-examination, thereby reducing the trauma inflicted upon victims during
legal proceedings.
Criminal justice responses to
gendered victimhood are not solely about legal procedures; they are deeply
intertwined with societal attitudes. Changing these attitudes and fostering
empathy for survivors remains an ongoing challenge. The media, through
responsible reporting, can contribute to a more supportive environment.
Additionally, the underreporting of
cases remains a significant obstacle to justice. Encouraging survivors to come
forward and ensuring their safety throughout the process is paramount.
Access to
Justice for Marginalized Women:
"Justice delayed is justice
denied, especially for marginalized women whose voices are often the softest
and most ignored.”
Access to justice for marginalized
women in India is a multifaceted challenge rooted in socioeconomic, cultural,
and systemic barriers. These challenges often intersect, compounding the
difficulties faced by marginalized women in their pursuit of justice.
Economic disparities represent a
significant barrier. Marginalized women, who are frequently economically
disadvantaged, often lack the resources to navigate the legal system
effectively. Costs associated with legal representation, travel to courts, and
other legal expenses can deter them from pursuing justice.
Limited legal literacy is another
formidable obstacle. Many marginalized women are unaware of their rights and
the available legal mechanisms to address gender-based violence. This lack of
awareness leaves them vulnerable to exploitation and reinforces the
underreporting of crimes.
Deep-rooted cultural norms and stigma
surrounding gender-based violence can silence marginalized women. Fear of
retaliation, social ostracism, and damage to their reputations can dissuade
them from reporting crimes or seeking legal remedies. These cultural barriers
create a pervasive culture of silence and inaction.
Efforts to address these challenges
include the provision of legal aid and support services. Organizations such as "Majlis"[44]
and "Lawyers Collective"[45]
in India work tirelessly to provide marginalized women with legal assistance.
These initiatives are instrumental in bridging the gap between marginalized
women and their access to justice.
Indian courts have played a pivotal
role in shaping access to justice for marginalized women. In the case of Lata
Singh v. State of U.P. (2006)[46],
the Supreme Court underscored the importance of safeguarding women who marry
outside their caste or religion from honor killings, setting a vital legal
precedent for their protection. Similarly, in the case of Shayara Bano v.
Union of India (2017)[47],
the Supreme Court declared the practice of triple talaq unconstitutional,
strengthening the legal rights of Muslim women.
While these legal reforms and support
services have made significant strides, the battle for access to justice for
marginalized women continues. The sheer volume of gender-based violence cases,
coupled with the often slow legal processes, can discourage marginalized women
from pursuing justice. Comprehensive reforms are needed to streamline legal
procedures, expedite cases involving marginalized women, and provide a more
inclusive and empathetic legal system.
Violence
Against Indigenous Women:
"The violence committed against
Indigenous women is not just a crime against individuals; it's an assault on
entire communities and cultures."
Violence against indigenous women in
India encompasses a range of abuses, including physical violence, sexual
assault, domestic violence, human trafficking, and structural violence arising
from discriminatory policies and land dispossession. These women often face
violence both within and outside their communities, making them doubly
vulnerable.
Historical and ongoing
marginalization of indigenous communities in India contributes to the vulnerability
of indigenous women. Dispossession of ancestral lands, lack of access to
education and healthcare, and limited economic opportunities further compound
their precarious position within society.
While India has a legal framework in
place to address violence against women, including indigenous women, challenges
persist in implementation and enforcement. The Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act, 2005[48]
and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989[49]
offer some protection. However, the remoteness of indigenous areas and a lack
of awareness about these laws can result in underreporting.
Indian courts, including the Supreme
Court, have played a crucial role in addressing violence against indigenous
women. In the case of Bhanwari Devi v. State of Rajasthan (1992)[50],
the Supreme Court recognized sexual harassment at the workplace as a violation
of fundamental rights, setting an important precedent. However, indigenous
women often face additional challenges in accessing the legal system due to
linguistic and cultural differences.
Cultural norms within indigenous
communities can sometimes perpetuate violence. Traditional dispute resolution
mechanisms may not adequately address gender-based violence, and women may fear
repercussions if they report abuse. Balancing cultural sensitivity with the
need for protection remains a challenge.
A feminist criminological approach
recognizes the intersectionality of indigenous women's experiences. The
overlapping factors of gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic status create
unique vulnerabilities. Policy interventions must address this
intersectionality, taking into account the specific needs and challenges faced
by indigenous women.
Cyberbullying
and Online Victimhood
"Cyberbullying is not just an
attack on a screen; it's an assault on an individual's emotional well-being,
challenging our understanding of victimhood in the digital age."
Cyberbullying refers to the use of
digital technologies to harass, threaten, or intimidate individuals. It has
emerged as a concerning form of victimization, and its impact is often deeply
gendered. Women and marginalized groups are disproportionately targeted online,
experiencing harassment that is often rooted in sexism, misogyny, and other
biases.
India has recognized the seriousness
of cyberbullying, enacting legal provisions to address it. The Information
Technology Act, 2000[51],
and its subsequent amendments criminalize various forms of online harassment.
In R. v. Ram, (2014)[52],
the Karnataka High Court held that offensive posts on social media platforms
could amount to online harassment, emphasizing the need for stringent legal
measures.
Online victimhood is a unique and
evolving concept. It challenges traditional notions of victimization by
expanding the realm of harm into the digital space. Online victimhood can
encompass various forms of harm, including cyberbullying, online harassment,
doxing, and non-consensual distribution of intimate images or "revenge
porn."
Online victimhood often has a deeply
gendered aspect. Women are more likely to experience gender-based
cyberbullying, which may include threats of sexual violence, body-shaming, and
explicit misogynistic comments. Such behavior not only perpetuates existing
gender inequalities but can also have severe psychological and emotional
consequences for the victims.
While the digital age has given voice
to many marginalized groups, it has also brought new challenges. The anonymity
offered by online spaces can embolden perpetrators, making it difficult for
victims to seek redress. In India, organizations like the "Cyber Peace
Foundation"[53] work to
combat cyberbullying and support victims, emphasizing the importance of digital
empowerment and responsible online behavior.
Gender and
Victim Support Services:
"Gender-sensitive victim support
services are a lifeline for survivors, recognizing the unique challenges faced
by women in their journey toward healing and justice.”
Gender plays a significant role in
how individuals experience victimization and seek support. Women, in
particular, face unique challenges due to societal norms, cultural biases, and
the prevalence of gender-based violence. Therefore, victim support services
must be tailored to address these specific needs.
India has taken significant steps in
recognizing the importance of gender-sensitive victim support services. The
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005[54],
acknowledges the need for protection orders and support services for women
facing domestic violence. In State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan[55],
the Bombay High Court emphasized the importance of providing support to victims
during legal proceedings.
Survivors of gender-based violence
often require psychological support to cope with the trauma they have
experienced. Gender-sensitive victim support services in India, such as those
offered by "Sakhi"[56],
provide counseling and therapy tailored to the needs of women survivors.
Access to legal aid is crucial for
women seeking justice after experiencing violence. Organizations like
"Majlis"[57]
and "Lawyers Collective"[58]
in India work to provide legal representation and assistance to women facing
gender-based violence, ensuring that their rights are protected.
Promoting awareness and education
about gender-based violence is a critical component of gender-sensitive support
services. Training for law enforcement officials and service providers on
recognizing and addressing gender-specific needs can lead to more empathetic
and effective support for survivors.
Despite
progress, challenges remain in providing comprehensive gender-sensitive support
services. Funding constraints, limited access in rural areas, and the stigma
associated with gender-based violence can hinder the effectiveness of these
services. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach,
involving government agencies, NGOs, and the wider community.
[1] Kimberlé Crenshaw,
"Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist
Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist
Politics," University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1), 139-167
[2] Chakraborty, Kalpana. (2017).
Caste, Class, and Gender Intersectionality in the Experiences of Violence: An
Ethnographic Exploration among the Dalit Women of West Bengal, India. Signs:
Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 42(2), 385-411.
[3] Nagraj, M. (2003). Dalit Women
Talk Differently: A Critique of 'Difference' and Towards a Dalit Feminist
Standpoint Position. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(44), 4702-4710.
[4] Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., &
McCall, L. (2013). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory,
Applications, and Praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,
38(4), 785-810.
[5] Harris, A. P. (1990). Race and
Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory. Stanford Law Review, 42(3), 581-616.
[6] Bauer, G. R., Ahmed, R., &
Coleman, T. A. (2017). Incorporating Intersectionality Theory into Population
Health Research Methodology: Challenges and the Potential to Advance Health
Equity. Social Science & Medicine, 110-117.
[7] Berger, P., & Luckmann, T.
(1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of
Knowledge. Doubleday.
[8] Chakravarti, U. (1993).
Conceptualizing sexual violence in patriarchal society: An overview. Economic
and Political Weekly, 28(17), 747-753.
[9] Vishaka and Others v. State of
Rajasthan and Others (1997) 6 SCC 241.
[10] The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act,
2013 (No. 13 of 2013), Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 1, 21
March 2013.
[11] The "Nirbhaya" Case
(2012): In December 2012, a brutal gang rape and murder case in Delhi, India,
sparked nationwide protests and led to significant changes in India's laws on
sexual violence.
[12] Bose, C. E. (2013). Constructing
Feminine Victimhood: The Representation of Women in Hindi Women's Magazines.
Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 963-978.
[13] Sen, A. (2000). The Many Faces of
Gender Inequality. New Republic, 33-39.
[14] S.R. Batra v. Taruna Batra, (2006)
3 SCC 530.
[15] Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 (No. 43 of 2005).
[16] Menon, N. (2007). Gender and
Politics in India. Oxford University Press.
[17] Bhanwari Devi case (1992):
Bhanwari Devi, a lower-caste woman, was gang-raped for attempting to prevent a
child marriage in Rajasthan, India. Her case led to widespread protests and
legal reforms in India.
[18] Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality
and women's empowerment: A critical analysis of the third Millennium
Development Goal 1. Gender & Development, 13(1), 13-24.
[19] State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali
Sarkar, AIR 1952 SC 75.
[20] Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 (No. 43 of 2005).
[21] Chakravarti, U. (2013). Families
in India: Beliefs and Realities. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 44(3),
339-359
[22] The "Delhi Gang Rape"
Case (2012): The gang rape and murder of a young woman in Delhi in December
2012 led to widespread protests and discussions about gender-based violence and
legal reforms in India.
[23] Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W.
(2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E.
T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp.
458-476). SAGE Publications Ltd.
[24] State of Punjab v. Iqbal Singh,
AIR 1991 SC 1538.
[25] Rupan Deol Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal
Singh Gill, (1996) 2 SCC 648
[26] Crenshaw, K. (1989).
Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of
Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University
of Chicago Legal Forum, 139-167.
[27] Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of
Empowerment/Exemplars of Prevention: Toward a Theory for Community Psychology.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121-148.
[28] International Institute for
Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. (2017). National Family Health Survey
(NFHS-4), India, 2015-16: State Fact Sheet.
[29] Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 (No. 43 of 2005).
[30] Duflo, E. (2012). Women's
Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4),
1051-1079.
[31] Vimochana. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://vimochana.net/
[32] Sakshi v. Union of India (2004) 5
SCC 518.
[33] State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh,
(1996) 2 SCC 384
[34] Stop Victim Blaming (n.d.).
Retrieved from https://stopvictimblaming.in/.
[35] State of U.P. v. Naushad, Criminal
Appeal No. 314 of 2013.
[36] Supreme Court of India (2018).
Guidelines regarding the Identity of Victims of Rape (In re: Destruction of
Evidence v. State of Bihar). Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 167 of 2012.
[37] The Media Foundation. (n.d.).
Retrieved from https://www.themediarumble.com/media-foundation.
[38] Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 (No. 43 of 2005).
[39] The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act,
2013 (No. 13 of 2013).
[40] Vimochana. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://vimochana.net/
[41] The "Nirbhaya Fund"
(2013): Established in the aftermath of the 2012 Delhi gang rape case to
support initiatives addressing violence against women
[42] Vishaka and Others v. State of
Rajasthan and Others (1997) 6 SCC 241.
[43] State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh,
(1996) 2 SCC 384.
[44] Majlis Legal Centre. (n.d.).
Retrieved from https://majlislaw.com/.
[45] Lawyers Collective. (n.d.).
Retrieved from http://www.lawyerscollective.org/.
[46] Lata Singh v. State of U.P.,
(2006) 5 SCC 475.
[47] Shayara Bano v. Union of India,
(2017) 9 SCC 1.
[48] Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 (No. 43 of 2005).
[49] The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (No. 33 of 1989).
[50] Bhanwari Devi v. State of
Rajasthan (1992) 6 SCC 503.
[51] Information Technology Act, 2000
(No. 21 of 2000)
[52] R. v. Ram, Criminal Appeal No. 325
of 2013.
[53] Cyber Peace Foundation. (n.d.).
Retrieved from https://www.cyberpeace.org/.
[54] Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 (No. 43 of 2005).
[55] State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar
Narayan, Criminal Appeal No. 493 of 2015.
[56] Sakhi. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://sakhi.org/.
[57] Majlis Legal Centre. (n.d.).
Retrieved from https://majlislaw.com/.
[58] Lawyers Collective. (n.d.). Retrieved
from http://www.lawyerscollective.org/.
Article Information
FEMINIST CRIMINOLOGY: GENDERED NATURE OF VICTIMHOOD By: Mary Christine Delicia. M
Authors: Mary Christine Delicia. M
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2023/10/11
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.