Open Access Research Article
CROSS-BORDER BANKING: LEGAL CHALLENGES AND REGULATORY HARMONIZATION EFFORTS
Published Paper
Article Details
CROSS-BORDER BANKING: LEGAL
CHALLENGES AND REGULATORY HARMONIZATION EFFORTS
AUTHORED BY - AISHY DEY & DR.
SANTOSH KUMAR
Abstract
Transnational banking transactions
have become an essential component of the globalised financial environment,
making it possible for international commerce and investment to proceed without
any interruptions. It is of the utmost importance to solve the legal problems
that are associated with cross-border banking rules in the context of India,
where economic links with the rest of the globe are quickly developing. The
purpose of this article is to investigate the present situation of cross-border
banking rules in India. It does so by investigating the legal difficulties,
jurisdictional concerns, and continuing attempts to promote efficient global
financial operations.
Introduction
In recent years, financial markets
have grown more interconnected, elevating global bank oversight and crisis
management. Financial system integration issues need legislation. This activity
involves careful consideration of various variables, including monitoring. A
separate organisation to monitor huge multinational banks would strengthen
European crisis preparation. International financial institutions would be
supervised. We'll name it the European Financial Supervision entity for this
study. Keep everything basic and straightforward.
India's economy changed drastically throughout the first three decades of this century. It became one of the fastest-growing nations and aimed to be an economic powerhouse after being isolated and underperforming. The situation changed drastically. Economic restructuring by the Indian government caused this change. The 1991 liberalisation wave prepared India for economic globalisation. Early nineties and beyond reforms connected India to global markets in numerous areas. Diverse areas integrated. Labour, trade, money, and information merged with these changes. This article will discuss the significant banking industry developments at this period. These changes occurred during this period. As India gets increasingly connected into the global financial system, its sensitivity to international economic issues grows. Crisis like the 2008 Great Recession has exposed global financial market integration vulnerabilities (Prasad, 2010). Under these situations, risk monitoring must be ongoing. This matters. Monitoring is recommended whenever feasible. Indian banks are vital to the economy. The RBI observes that banks dominate the Indian financial system, which is important.
India's economy changed drastically throughout the first three decades of this century. It became one of the fastest-growing nations and aimed to be an economic powerhouse after being isolated and underperforming. The situation changed drastically. Economic restructuring by the Indian government caused this change. The 1991 liberalisation wave prepared India for economic globalisation. Early nineties and beyond reforms connected India to global markets in numerous areas. Diverse areas integrated. Labour, trade, money, and information merged with these changes. This article will discuss the significant banking industry developments at this period. These changes occurred during this period. As India gets increasingly connected into the global financial system, its sensitivity to international economic issues grows. Crisis like the 2008 Great Recession has exposed global financial market integration vulnerabilities (Prasad, 2010). Under these situations, risk monitoring must be ongoing. This matters. Monitoring is recommended whenever feasible. Indian banks are vital to the economy. The RBI observes that banks dominate the Indian financial system, which is important.
Prakash et al. (2018) suggest banks steal the most household savings. The industry also handles most family financial duties countrywide. Over 46% of bilateral exposures were banking, according to the RBI in March 2018. Over three times more than other financial corporations' contributions. This shows that India's financial system relies on banks. Thus, India's banking industry is often considered a strong economic foundation. Any threat from this business might harm several economic areas. This is feasible. The 1934 Reserve Bank of India Act and 1949 Banking Regulation Act empower the RBI to regulate India's banks. Their years saw both legislation passed.
The Reserve Bank of India controls Indian banking overseas under the FEMA Act. Limitations constrain India's cross-border banking business. This will be elaborated shortly.
International banking may benefit both lenders and borrowers inside a country. Increased investment alternatives, asset returns, risk diversification, and competition-induced efficiency should provide these advantages. Financial investment is needed for these rewards. More interconnected financial networks may spread risks across countries. Cross-border financial networks. The recent global financial crisis and its aftermath threatened the global economy. Such risks were prevalent. This research examines foreign financial businesses in India. Foreign banking has prudential limits. India has opened its capital account somewhat and carefully. In other nations, no. We'll study Indian banks' data to assess their international exposure. International banking, including India's foreign assets and liabilities, geographical origin, and currency breakdown, will be covered.
Foreign business is considered a financial danger in India. A part of this study met research standards. The international banking sector's soundness will be assessed using Reserve Bank and BIS secondary data. An assessment will evaluate banking industry health. The Indian banking sector, its present state, recent advancements, and difficulties will be discussed next. Current industry issues will be addressed.
Objectives
Ø Cross-border banking refers to the
provision of financial services by banks across different countries. It is of
significant importance in the realm of international finance due to its impact
on global economic integration, financial stability, and the facilitation of
international trade and investment.
Ø Identify and evaluate the legal,
regulatory, and enforcement challenges encountered by banks engaging in cross-border
commercial activities.
Ø Assess the effectiveness of
regulatory regimes governing cross-border banking activity in different
countries in safeguarding customers and ensuring financial stability.
Ø In order to minimise the probability
of legal conflicts and promote a more cohesive regulatory environment, it is
crucial to assess existing initiatives and efforts aimed at standardising
regulations and norms across different jurisdictions.
Ø Explore the impact of regulatory
harmonisation efforts on financial markets, cross-border banking activity, and
global economic stability. Additionally, propose strategies for enhancing
collaboration across regulatory organisations.
The Importance of Banking
across International Borders
It is essential to have banking services
that span international borders in order to facilitate international commerce,
investment, and financial collaboration. As a result of the tremendous
expansion of global interconnection of financial markets in India,
international transactions have become a vital component of the economic
development of the country.
Legal Complexities in
Cross-Border Transactions:
Banking transactions that take place
across international borders are complex because they include a number of
different countries, different legal systems, and different regulatory
frameworks. In order to guarantee the uninterrupted movement of money across
international boundaries, India, as a participant in global financial markets,
is required to handle these challenges.
Jurisdictional Challenges:
Jurisdictional Challenges:
It might be difficult to ascertain
whose jurisdiction is appropriate to transactions that take place across
international borders. As a result of the potential for disagreements to occur
over contractual duties and the possibility of regulatory bodies from several
nations asserting authority, legal complications may arise. When it comes to
addressing jurisdictional problems and harmonising legislation, Indian
regulators often work together with their colleagues from other countries.
Harmonization Efforts:
In order to promote uniformity and
reduce legal uncertainty, it is vital to harmonise the legislation that govern
banking across international borders. The Financial Stability Board (FSB) and
the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision are two of the international
organisations that India works with to set uniform norms and recommendations.
India is an active participant in international forums.
Current Regulatory
Landscape:
Regulations issue by
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
As India's official banking authority,
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) plays a crucial part in the process of
formulating global banking rules. Guidelines for the regulation of different
components are issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). These guidelines
include limits on foreign exchange, anti-money laundering (AML) procedures, and
prudential rules for Indian banks that are involved in overseas operations.
(FEMA) stands for the Foreign Exchange Management Act.
In India, the Foreign Exchange
Management Act (FEMA) is an important statutory framework that governs
transactions. With this, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is given the authority
to develop laws that would ensure orderly foreign currency markets and regulate
capital flows. To ensure that international standards are adhered to, the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) establishes the legal framework for
foreign transactions.
Regulations Regarding the Prevention of Money Laundering (AML) and the Countering of Terrorism Financing (CTF):
Regulations Regarding the Prevention of Money Laundering (AML) and the Countering of Terrorism Financing (CTF):
The possibility of money laundering
and funding terrorist organisations is significantly increased when
international banking is involved. In order to bring its anti-money laundering
and counterterrorism financing legislation in line with international
standards, India has reinforced them and implemented steps to improve due
diligence, customer identification, and the reporting of questionable
transactions.
Agreements that is both bilateral and multilateral:
For the purpose of easing the process
of banking across international borders, India engages into bilateral and
multilateral agreements with other nations. Among the topics that these
agreements address are taxes, information sharing, and collaboration in the
fight against financial crimes. These agreements contribute to the establishment
of a legal framework that is beneficial to certain activities.
Challenges and Mitigation
Strategies:
The fluctuation of currencies:
The parties involved in international
transactions are vulnerable to variations in the currency exchange rate. In
order to shield companies and financial institutions from the harmful effects
of currency movements, India has established risk mitigation measures. These
methods include the use of derivatives and products that hedge against currency
fluctuations.
The Arbitrage of Regulations:
The Arbitrage of Regulations:
Cross-border banking is fraught with
difficulties due to regulatory arbitrage, which occurs when companies take
advantage of regulatory gaps between different countries. India takes action to
solve this issue by working together with international regulatory authorities
to encourage the convergence of regulatory standards and prohibit actions that
harm financial stability.
Compliance Standards on a Global Scale:
Compliance Standards on a Global Scale:
It is very necessary for Indian banks
that are involved in operations that span international borders to adhere to
global compliance requirements, particularly the regulations of Basel III.
Continuous compliance monitoring is carried out by regulatory bodies, notably
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), in order to guarantee the stability and
resilience of the Indian banking system.
Integration of Technological Systems:
Integration of Technological Systems:
The growing dependence on technology
in international banking necessitates the implementation of innovative
technical solutions and the implementation of stringent cybersecurity measures.
When it comes to protecting the integrity of international financial
transactions, India is making significant investments in the improvement of
technology infrastructure and cybersecurity regulations respectively.
Literature Review
The liberalisation of financial
services and the liberalisation of capital accounts are two economic modalities
that interact with one another in a number of different ways (Dobson and
Jacquet, 1998). It is of the utmost importance to take into consideration the
fact that these two modes of economic organisation overlap in fundamental ways.
It should not come as a surprise that the ability of international banks to
offer local financial services (mode 3) might be undermined if they do not have
the ability to manage their capital accounts independently. There is a
possibility that this may develop into a significant issue. Both the
liberalisation of capital accounts and the availability of financial services
made available by capital flows are the factors that influence the incentives
that are used to support the growth of local businesses. Additionally, it is
important to remember to take into account the interaction between the
liberalisation of financial services and the deregulation of local markets. The
incentives that financial service providers have to create and promote new
goods and services will differ depending on whether or not attempts to change
the domestic system are successful. One of the difficulties associated with
this interface is that it is not simple to ascertain which factors have an
effect on international financial transactions. It is necessary to give careful
thought to the extent of both the scope and the rationale of international
banking. Due to the fact that both of these elements have an impact on the
potential impact on competitiveness, this is the situation that exists. A
statement that there would be no effect in the absence of cross-border monetary
flows or entrance would be an oversimplification. The possible impact is
dependant on the wider set of reasons; to say that there will be no effect
would be an oversimplification. The reason that this is the case is due to the
fact that determinants are the elements that influence the potential effect.
According to Buch (2003), Buch and
DeLong (2004), and Focaselli and Pozzolo (2003), finance hubs seem to provide a
different purpose. This is the case despite the fact that these characteristics
are vulnerable to a smaller number of entries. They have a significant edge over
other sorts of businesses that are in competition with them. According to
Dooley (2000), capital movements are driven by irrational incentives, such as
the moral hazard that results from government safety nets. All of this material
was first obtained from scholarly journals, which were the original sources.
There are indirect hurdles that continue to have an influence on the admissions
process, such as restrictions on mergers and acquisitions (Berger, Buch,
DeLong, and DeYoung, 2004). These constraints are also in addition to the wide
limitations that have previously been highlighted. In addition to that, we have
already addressed the shortcomings that are more generic in nature.
According to both anecdotal evidence
and research carried out in 1997 by the Financial Leaders Group, these
challenges, which are posed by companies that have already established
themselves in the market, may be subtle. It is possible, for instance, that
these issues could become more complicated depending on the particulars of the
situation. For instance, in South Africa, incumbents are said to enjoy
preferential pricing or other laws that restrict their use of the payment
system. In France, interest payments on demand accounts were severely
restricted. This assertion is supported by the fact that incumbents are the
only individuals who are permitted to make use of the payment method in both
circumstances. In a nutshell, the most important thing to remember is that the
elements have an effect on the outcomes that might occur in international
banking. To restate, nations who are currently experiencing considerable
difficulties on both the political and financial fronts may be the ones to
experience the full impact of greater competition. The reason for this is
because the legal systems of these countries prohibit the provision of
financial services to nationals of other countries.
According to Agenor (2013), the use
of capital accounting was a significant contributor to the increasing
integration of emerging market economies. As Agenor (2013) demonstrates, there
are a number of different methods in which the benefits of international
financial integration may be fully exploited. Enhanced domestic investment and
growth, more stringent macroeconomic policymaking, a stronger and more
dependable local financial system, and demand smoothing via international risk
sharing are all examples of routes that fall into this category. There is a
relationship that exists between each of these avenues of communication. Having
said that, it is important to keep in mind that there are some expenses
associated with this relationship. There has been an increase in the likelihood
that a shock that occurs in one nation might spread to other nations that are
involved in the same sector as the globe becomes increasingly linked via
financial channels. Specifically, this is due to the fact that these two events
have been taking place concurrently.
According to Borio and Disyatat
(2011) and Borio (2014), these networks have the potential to amplify the effects
of financial booms and busts, which might ultimately result in crises. The fact
that they were involved in the issue's spread and that they were the primary
cause of the problem is indicated by this.
According to Borio and colleagues (2015), the global monetary and financial system increases the possibility of financial crises, which may have a big influence on the macroeconomy. These crises might have a negative impact when they occur. According to Dungey and Gajurel (2015), it is challenging for local governments to deal with crises that extend beyond the borders of their own countries. This is the situation due to the fact that natural catastrophes almost never end at national boundaries. In addition, previous study conducted by Cerutti et al. (2014) debunked the notion that the mechanisms of spillover transmission and international financial ties are less complicated than they really are.
According to Tonzer (2015),
international banking does have the potential to be beneficial while situations
are calm; nevertheless, it should be approached with care during times of
instability due to the possible damage that might be inflicted to the whole
network as a result of the ripple effects. For the simple reason that it is not
completely out of the question that unforeseen outcomes may come to pass. As a
result of the Great Recession and the aftermath of it in 2007 and 2008, these
problems have recently come back to the surface. According to Park and Shin
(2017), there is evidence to imply that during the financial crisis of 2007,
developing economies that had linkages to the banks of crisis-stricken nations
had larger transfers of money out of their country. This is because the
negative effects of the crisis were felt most strongly in these countries, which
explains why this was the situation. Based on our best assessment, we believe
that the integration of banks will have implications that will be felt across
the whole financial system.
Assessing the current degree of network and contagion dangers in various banking sectors across a variety of countries has been accomplished via the use of a number of different methodologies. Graph-theory based network analysis has been used in a number of studies that have been conducted on the global financial system (Minoiu and Reyes, 2013; Huser, 2015 for a more comprehensive overview). Our goal is to get a deeper comprehension of the monetary system via the use of these investigations. Between 1978 and 2010, Minoiu and Reyes (2013) discovered a positive association between economic cycles and the frequency of international financial networks. This correlation was determined to be significant. The information that they gathered throughout that period of time served as the basis for their results. Further, they discovered that nations had a greater degree of interdependence before to the onset of crises, but that when the crises occurred, they tended to diverge from one another. In addition, they discovered that the prior recessions had increased aggregate flows for the same reasons, which showed that the recession that occurred in 2007 was not any different from the previous recessions. Based on the findings of this research, it seems that the central placement of the shock within the network had a role in the severity of the crisis. In addition, Degryse et al. (2009), Degryse and Nguyen (2009), Upar and Worms (2004), Gabrieli et al. (2015), and Upper (2011) have used bank data to simulate the matrix of bilateral lending agreements between local and foreign banks in certain countries. These studies were conducted as part of the research conducted by Upper (2011). These examinations were carried out with the use of data obtained from both local and international financial institutions. Throughout the whole of our investigation, we have maintained the perspective of the bank in mind. A multinomial logit model, which is an econometric approach, was used by Gropss et al. (2009) in order to investigate a collection of European banks during the years 1994 to 2003 in order to determine whether or not there was any major cross-border contagion. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether or not there was a significant connection between the two.
Regulatory challenges in the finance industry
It is usually true that global
financial services organisation changes have improved results. This is usually
true. These consequences include an increase in financial service availability,
accessibility, and efficiency. Personal and business gains have been
considerable due to the economy. This applies to businesses and people.
However, these advances are forcing financial industry regulators and other
officials to face new issues. Many of these issues are regarding financial
system stability, which is caused by emerging threats that might destabilise
the system. The economy drives most of these concerns. Policymakers look for
more than just results that match their expectations when making decisions.
They also consider several additional things. There are also new challenges with
ensuring financial markets work properly. Concerns have been raised. This means
providing high-quality financial services at low prices to the most users with
the widest reach. These services are also available to the most customers.
In light of this, there has been a simultaneous movement towards rewriting rules and installing new laws in various sectors (called "re-regulation") to ensure financial institutions and markets operate effectively. This is done to ensure stability and efficacy. The design and implementation of these new limits have been debated. Both restriction characteristics are conflicting. The overall approach to financial sector regulation and supervision in light of changes in banks' special nature; competition policy in financial intermediation; consumer protection; regulation costs; and further harmonisation of rules and practises have been raised. These are some of the concerns raised. These are only a few issues raised. Some of the difficulties listed below have arisen. Many more difficulties have arisen. In the following part, I'll discuss the challenges facing developing nations. After resolving each problem, I will go on to the next.
Cases:
Danske Bank Money Laundering Scandal (2018–present):
Danske Bank is Denmark's biggest bank
and operates in sixteen countries. Since its founding, it has operated
consistently for about 150 years. After years of denials and willful delay by
its senior leadership, Danske confessed its participation in the largest
European money laundering scandal in September 2018. The scandal included
large-scale money laundering. The incident included questionable transactions
from Danske's small Estonian branch between 2007 and 2016. These deals exceeded
€200 billion. By October 5, 2018, Danske shares had plummeted to a record low.
This was due to the US Department of Justice's criminal investigation. Danske's
share price has plunged over 45% since their unethical behaviour was revealed.
This drop began once the corporation admitted its wrongdoing. Danske shares cost
250 DKK in February 2018. On November 16, 2018, the share price dropped to
136.80 DKK. Danish, French, British, American, and Estonian authorities are
investigating Danske for criminal and regulatory violations. These
investigations continue.
Denmark's biggest bank, Danske Bank, pleaded guilty to money laundering and agreed to pay a $400 million punishment. This happened recently. This plea, the outcome of an inquiry into the bank's large-scale money laundering programme, has major implications for financial crime risk management.
Denmark's biggest bank, Danske Bank, pleaded guilty to money laundering and agreed to pay a $400 million punishment. This happened recently. This plea, the outcome of an inquiry into the bank's large-scale money laundering programme, has major implications for financial crime risk management.
Between 2007 and 2018, the Estonian unit of the bank laundered billions of dollars.The monies were thought to have been acquired illegally, but they were cleaned up by a network of shell companies and placed in various banks throughout the globe. The scheme was detected in 2013, but the bank did not reveal the full scope of the misbehaviour until 2018.
Danske Estonia and its Danish headquarters failed to fix major risk management, customer onboarding, and transaction monitoring issues. Both failures happened simultaneously. Despite warnings from authorities, internal auditors, and whistleblowers. Due to this, the global banking system may have conducted 200 billion US dollars in dubious transactions. Official papers recently released to the public have illuminated key facets of the Danske case and its effect on correspondent banks.
Deutsche Bank Compliance
Issues (2019):
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, or
the Company, has paid over 130 million dollars to terminate the government's
FCPA and commodities fraud investigations. A coordinated resolution asks
$85,186,206 in criminal penalties, $681,480 in criminal disgorgement,
$1,223,738 in victim compensation, and $43,329,622 to the SEC.
Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank provides financial services worldwide. Deutsche Bank is worldwide. Deutsche Bank hid third-party middleman payments and bribery. Scheme-related internal accounting control breaches are charged. A second plot included manipulating publicly traded precious metals futures contracts for illegal commodities trading. This proposition prompted charges.
Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank provides financial services worldwide. Deutsche Bank is worldwide. Deutsche Bank hid third-party middleman payments and bribery. Scheme-related internal accounting control breaches are charged. A second plot included manipulating publicly traded precious metals futures contracts for illegal commodities trading. This proposition prompted charges.
Deutsche Bank executed a DPA with the US Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, Criminal Division's Fraud Section, and MLARS. The deal delays some criminal proceedings. This DPA lasts three years. Deutsche Bank was charged with commodities-related wire fraud and conspiracy to violate the FCPA relating books and records and internal accounting systems. Both claims were against the business. The Eastern District of New York received the criminal filing today.
Deutsche Bank participated in a seven-year pattern, according to Justice Department Criminal Division Deputy Assistant Attorney General Robert Zink. Deutsche Bank mishandled corporate funds and disguised illegal and unethical payments. Deutsche Bank dealers on three continents defrauded public financial markets for five years. The department's acceptance of this resolution reflects its commitment to assisting publicly listed corporations create strong internal financial controls and honest corporate documentation. It reflects the department's commitment to monitoring US public markets to maintain public financial institution trust and reliability. Deutsche Bank conducted a criminal plot to hide payments to consultants who facilitated bribery to foreign politicians and others for profitable commercial initiatives to maintain public market surveillance, according to Acting United States Attorney Seth D. DuCharme of the Eastern District of New York. "The scheme was designed to conceal payments to consultants who were considered to be consultants." "The goal of this scheme was to allow Deutsche Bank to retain lucrative business projects." In the news release, "This office will continue to hold accountable responsible financial institutions that operate within the United States and engage in practices that facilitate criminal activity in order to increase their bottom line."
"The USPS is proud to investigate complex fraud and corruption cases that affect American investors," said Criminal Investigations Group Inspector in Charge Delany De Léon-Colón. "These cases have an impact on American investors." Dishonesty might cost global competitive markets unfathomable financial losses. Our FBI and DOJ colleagues worked together to make today's historic action, which symbolises our efforts to defend the US and global economy, possible. Their teamwork caused this.
Conclusion:
India's engagement in the global economy is significantly influenced by the rules that govern financial transactions that take place across international borders. In spite of the fact that legal obstacles continue to exist, regulatory authorities, particularly the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), have taken a proactive approach, which demonstrates their dedication to creating an atmosphere that promotes international financial transactions.
India's engagement in the global economy is significantly influenced by the rules that govern financial transactions that take place across international borders. In spite of the fact that legal obstacles continue to exist, regulatory authorities, particularly the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), have taken a proactive approach, which demonstrates their dedication to creating an atmosphere that promotes international financial transactions.
Collaboration
with foreign counterparts, adherence to global norms, and the creation of solid
regulatory frameworks will be essential as India continues to integrate into
the global financial system. Also essential will be the application of global
standards. India is in a position to successfully manage the problems of
cross-border banking and to contribute to the stability and expansion of the
global financial ecosystem as a result of the continuous efforts to resolve the
intricacies of the law, to increase regulatory harmonisation, and to embrace
technology advances.
References
Legal Challenges in
Cross Border Transactions Involving Indian Companies | Into Legal World, Home | Into Legal World : Connecting Legal
Fraternity, https://www.intolegalworld.com/article?title=legal-challenges-in-cross-border-transactions-involving-indian-companies (last
visited Jan. 21, 2024).
Anta Pattabiraman, What Are the Different Challenges and Issues With Cross-Border Payment?, All-in-one payment platform for global
businesses | inai (July 12, 2023), https://inai.io/blog/different-challenges-and-issues-with-cross-border-payment.
Beck, Thorsten, 2006, Creating and
Efficient Financial System: Challenges in a Global Economy, World Bank Working
Research Paper 3856, February, Washington, D.C.
Berglöf, Erik and Stijn Claessens,
2006, Enforcement and Corporate Governance, World Bank Research Observer, 21:1,
123–150.
Boot, Arnoud W.A., and Anjolein
Schmeits. 2005. The Competitive Challenge in Banking. Amsterdam Center for Law
& Economics (ACLE), Working Paper No. 2005- 08.
Caprio, Gerard, Jr., Douglas Darrell
Evanoff, George G. Kaufman (eds.), Cross-Border Banking: Regulatory Challenges,
The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the World Bank, World Scientific
Studies in International Economics.
Calomiris, Charles, and Charles M.
Kahn. 1991. The Role of Demandable Debt in Structuring Optimal Banking
Arrangements. American Economic Review, June, 497- 513.
Claessens, Stijn, 2006, Competitive
Implications of Cross-Border Banking, in Gerard Caprio, Douglas Darrell
Evanoff, George G. Kaufman (eds.), Cross-Border Banking: Regulatory Challenges,
The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the World Bank, World Scientific
Studies in International Economics.
Claessens, Stijn, Gergely Dobos,
Daniela Klingebiel, and Luc Laeven, 2003. The Growing Importance of Networks in
Finance and Its Effects on Competition, in Anna Nagurney (Ed.), Innovations in
Financial and Economic Networks, Edward Elgar Publishers, Northampton, MA, USA,
110-135.
Claessens, Stijn, and Enrico Perotti,
2005, Finance and inequality: channels and evidence. Background paper for the
World Development Report, 2006, mimeo World Bank and University of Amsterdam.
Claessens, Stijn and Geoffrey
Underhill, 2005. The Need for Institutional Changes in the Global Financial
System: An Analytical Framework, in Joost Teunissen and Age Akkerman (eds),
Protecting the Poor: Global Financial Institutions and the Vulnerability of
Low-Income Countries, J, Fondad Conference Series, The Hague, the Netherlands,
79- 114
European Commission, White Paper on
Financial Services Policy 2005-2010, Brussels, December.
G-10, 2001, Report of the Group of Ten
on Consolidation in the Financial Sector (so called Roger Ferguson Report), http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/52/1896113.pdf
Gkoutzinis, Apostolos. Undated “How
far is Basel from Geneva? International Regulatory Convergence and the
Elimination of Barriers to International Financial Integration.” Mimeo. Harvard
University
Article Information
CROSS-BORDER BANKING: LEGAL CHALLENGES AND REGULATORY HARMONIZATION EFFORTS
Authors: AISHY DEY, DR. SANTOSH KUMAR
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/05/01
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.