Open Access Research Article
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF IPR IN DIGITAL AGE-SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PATENT BY: PREETI BHAGAT
Published Paper
Article Details
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF IPR IN DIGITAL
AGE-SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PATENT
AUTHORED
BY: PREETI BHAGAT
PRESIDENCY
UNIVERSITY BANGALORE
Acknowledgement
The guidance, assistance and
support received throughout the writing of this Research Paper have contributed
significantly to this work, to the extent that this paper would not have been
possible without it. I would like to thank my professor and supervisor
ASST-PROFESSOR- NEHA GUPTA, school of law, Presidency university, for her
guidance, patience, encouragement and useful criticism. I thank her for the
effort she took to help me throughout my research, particularly to organize my
thoughts in a logical manner. She helped me disintegrate ideas into the most
basic form and then rebuild them in an organized fashion. I also thank her for
all the encouragement and support which helped me through this pursuit.
ABSTRACT
In
the light of the quickly changing digital age, this research paper undertakes a
thorough analysis of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) framework, with an
emphasis on patent law. The article critically assesses whether current IPR
policies are adequate and flexible enough to handle the particular problems
presented by the digital landscape, as technological breakthroughs continue to
transform industries and redefine the frontiers of innovation. The study uses a
multifaceted methodology to evaluate how well patent laws support innovation,
encourage competition, and protect inventors' rights in the digital age. It
does this by integrating legal analysis, case studies, and empirical data. The
study examines the complex interactions that emerge between the current patent
system and cutting-edge technologies like biotechnology, blockchain, and
artificial intelligence both chances and challenges. Furthermore, the study
explores the international landscape of intellectual property rights (IPR),
looking at differences in patent laws between countries and how those
differences affect trade, technological transfer, and international
cooperation. The harmonisation attempts and the difficulties caused by the
disparities in legal norms receive particular focus.
The
study also examines how the digital era has affected conventional ideas of
intellectual property, raising concerns about whether the current legal
framework fairly balances the interests of innovators and the general public.
It looks into topics like collaborative innovation methods, open-source
movements, and how patents affect knowledge availability. Finally, this study
attempts to present insightful analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of
the current IPR system, along with suggestions for prospective changes that
could make patent rules more compatible with the needs of the digital era. This
study adds to the continuing discussion about how intellectual property rights
might best act as catalysts for innovation in a world that is becoming more and
more digitalized by critically examining the current legal framework.
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Intellectual
property rights (IPRs) are a group of legal safeguards that are bestowed upon
people or organisations in relation to their ideas or creations. These rights
allow the proprietors the sole authority to utilise, transfer, and profit from
these intellectual assets. Striking a careful balance between encouraging
innovation and making sure the results of intellectual labour contribute to the
public domain is the core goal of intellectual property rights (IPR)
regulations. Although the idea of intellectual property has been around for
centuries, the current legal system has developed to meet the demands of
globalisation, technological innovation, and shifting economic conditions. The
Statute of Monopolies, which was passed in England in 1624 and represents an
early attempt to control and restrict the grant of monopolies, is where the
idea of IPR originated. As time goes on, the range and character of
intellectual The scope of property protection has grown to encompass trade
secrets, patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Global agreements and
organisations were established to harmonise and enforce intellectual property
rights (IPR) regulations across countries as a result of the 20th century's
technological advancements and commerce internationalisation. One of the main
components of intellectual property rights (IPR) is the patent system, which
gives creators temporary exclusivity over their creations. This encourages the
publication of innovative concepts and gives inventors a way to recover their
costs. Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, the patent system saw
substantial changes that resulted in the creation of patent offices and the
harmonisation of patent laws across numerous nations. A significant step
towards the globalisation of intellectual property rights is the Agreement on
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which is housed
within the World Trade Organisation (WTO) IP rules. TRIPS, which came into
effect in 1995, established basic requirements for the protection of
intellectual property, including the establishment and enforcement of strong
legal frameworks for trade secrets, patents, trademarks, and copyrights by
member nations. IPR laws face significant difficulties in the digital age. The
effectiveness of conventional legal systems has come under scrutiny due to the
ease with which information may be shared, the rapidity of technological
advancement, and the global reach of the internet. IPR laws need to be
continuously reevaluated and adjusted in light of issues like software patents,
digital piracy, and the interaction of intellectual property with developing
technologies like biotechnology and artificial intelligence. As technology develops
and transforms sectors, the conversation over intellectual property rights must
go on. Finding the ideal balance between promoting wider societal benefits and
incentivizing innovation is a complicated process, and the development of IPR
laws is a reflection of the continuous work to handle these complexity in a
world that is changing and becoming more connected.
STATEMENT
OF THE PROBLEM
As
technology becomes integral to everyday life, the question of how patents
impact access to knowledge and serve the broader public interest becomes
crucial. Striking a balance between rewarding inventors and ensuring the
dissemination of knowledge for societal benefit requires a careful examination
of the existing legal framework.
HISTORICAL
PERSPECTIVE
The
historical viewpoint offers a context for comprehending the development of
patent law. With a focus on patents in particular, the continuous critical
analysis of intellectual property rights laws in the digital age aims to assess
how the legal system has evolved over time and how effectively it meets the
demands of the complex modern technological environment. Technological,
societal, and economic developments have moulded the past iterative and dynamic
evolution of intellectual property rights (IPR) legislation, especially in the
context of patents. The origins of patent systems may be discovered in the
times of ancient civilizations, when innovators were given exclusive rights by
their governments to promote advancement. On the other hand, official legal
frameworks for the protection of intellectual property started to appear in the
early modern era. Origins of Patent Systems (17th Century): The English Statute
of Monopolies, passed in 1624, is sometimes cited as a turning point in the
development of patents. This law represented the first organised effort to
control and restrict the misuse of royal grants of monopolistic powers. The act
set the stage for the creation of a more organised patent system by exempting
some inventions from the monopoly restriction.
The
19th-century Industrial Revolution and Patent Offices: Technology advanced
rapidly in the 18th and 19th centuries with the start of the Industrial
Revolution. Developing nations have up official patent offices in recognition
of the need to safeguard innovators and promote disclosure. The United States
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was established as the first entity with
the capacity to grant patents when the country passed the Patent Act of 1790. Paris
Convention and Internationalisation (19th–20th Century): The Paris Convention
for the Protection of Industrial Property was established in in 1883 as a
result of the expansion of global trade and the need for standardised
protection. This was a significant development towards harmonising patent laws establishing
the framework for global collaboration in intellectual property issues amongst
member nations.
20th-century
TRIPS Agreement: The World Trade Organisation (WTO) enforced the Agreement on
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in 1995, further
internationalising and standardising intellectual property protection. TRIPS
requires member nations to establish strong legal frameworks and sets minimum
requirements for patent protection. Emerging Technologies in the Digital Age
(late 20th century onward): The conventional patent systems faced tremendous
challenges with the emergence of the digital age. The sufficiency of current
legal frameworks has been reevaluated in light of the proliferation of software
patents, worries about patent trolls, and the quick speed of invention in
industries like biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and information
technology. Collaborative Innovation and Open Source (21st century): The 21st
century saw a challenge to old proprietary methodologies with the rise of
open-source movements and collaborative innovation models. This change forced a
reevaluation of patents' role in an environment where joint development and
information exchange are becoming more and more common.
LEGAL
CHALLENGES
Topic
Content Eligibility:
Challenge:
With the emergence of software and business method patents, determining what is
eligible for patent protection has grown more difficult. Determining what
constitutes patentable subject matter is a challenge for courts and patent
offices, especially in areas where technology and business innovation coexist.
Norm
for Non-Obviousness:
Challenge:
It can be arbitrary and prone to disagreements for an invention to have to be
non-obvious to someone with ordinary experience in the relevant field. Judges
and patent examiners have a difficult time determining the degree of innovation
necessary for patentability, especially in quickly developing industries where
small steps forward may be hard to see.
Patent
Abuse: Problem: Patent trolling is the act of claiming patents mainly in order
to demand settlements or licencing fees; instead of compared to creating or
applying the patented technology. This puts the integrity of the patent system
at jeopardy and could stifle innovation by putting lawful inventors and
businesses at the expense of litigation.
Globalisation
and Standards Divergence: Difficulty: As trade becomes more international,
different country patent laws present difficulties for international
businesses. Companies that operate in several jurisdictions may face legal
complexity and strategic challenges due to the lack of uniformity in patent
laws and enforcement methods.
Novel
Technologies: New and disruptive technologies like blockchain, biotechnology,
and artificial intelligence present special difficulties for patents. There are
many legal challenges in determining patentability, determining disclosure
requirements, and making sure that patent rules keep up with the fast evolving
nature of these technologies.
Previous
Work and Excessive Information: Challenge: The enormous quantity Finding
pertinent previous art is a difficult task for patent examiners due to the
abundance of prior art and information available online. This may lead to the
granting of unduly wide patents, which may cause future difficulties and
disputes.
Patent
Quality and Excessive Generalisations: Difficulty: There are concerns about the
issued patents' quality. Claims that are too general or ambiguous may lead to
litigation since rivals may contest the patents' validity. Patent law is
constantly faced with the difficulty of ensuring that patents are accurate,
unambiguous, and really inventive.
Unethical
Behaviour: Challenge: A patent may become unenforceable if it is claimed that
unfair behaviour occurred during the patent application procedure, such as
failing to provide the patent office with material information. figuring out
how much disclosure is required and Penalties for non-compliance are difficult
to enforce in the long run.
Delays
and Backlogs at the Patent Office: Problem: Backlogs at patent offices across
the globe frequently cause delays in the review and issuance of patents. This
can impede innovation, especially in sectors that move quickly and where prompt
protection is essential.
Regulatory
Concerns: When applied improperly, patents can be exploited as instruments for
anticompetitive activity. It can be difficult to strike a balance between the
exclusive rights that patents confer and the requirement to maintain market
competitiveness when antitrust laws and patent law collide.
It
is crucial to resolve these legal issues if the patent system is to remain
intact and continue to effectively foster innovation while preserving
fair competition.
HYPOTHESIS
The
existing patent framework may find it difficult to keep up with the rapid
breakthroughs in disciplines like biotechnology, blockchain, and artificial
intelligence that characterise the digital age. According to the theory,
existing systems for evaluating and safeguarding innovations might not be able
to keep up with the rapidly changing landscape of developing technology.
- The
traditional ideas of exclusive rights ingrained in patent regimes are being
challenged by the growth of open-source movements and collaborative innovation
approaches. It is proposed that a reassessment of the function and efficacy of
patents in encouraging and defending innovation may be necessary due to the
conflict between the need for open collaboration and the defence of
intellectual property.
REVIEW OF
LITERATURE
Impact
of Technological Developments on Patent Law: The literature has placed a lot of
emphasis on the quick speed at which technology is developing. The difficulties
of adapting established patent frameworks to new technologies are covered by
academics like Bessen and Meurer (2008) and Cohen et al. (2000). They draw
attention to problems with patent quality, non-obviousness, and the difficulty
of defining patentable subject matter in industries like software and
biotechnology.
Harmonisation
of Patents and Globalisation: The influence of globalisation on patent law and
the difficulties in standardising patent requirements between legal systems are
recurrent concerns. The effects of international trade agreements, such the
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), on
the harmonisation of patents worldwide are examined by Maskus (2000) and
Ginarte and Park (1997). The conflict between the steadfastness and the
requirement for harmonisation peculiarities unique to a given jurisdiction is
an important field of study.
Open
Source Initiatives and Teamwork in Innovation: The growth of collaborative
innovation models and open-source movements is covered in the literature.
Benkler (2002) and Von Hippel (2005) examine the ways in which these
developments subvert conventional patent notions of exclusivity. Scholarly
discussion continues on the mechanics of open collaboration, the function of
patents in such settings, and the effect on technological advancement.
Knowledge
Accessibility and Public Interest: Reichman and Franklin (2002) and Boldrin and
Levine (2008) address issues of public interest and access to knowledge. The
literature investigates the trade-off between the societal advantages of
universal access to inventions and the exclusive rights bestowed by patents.
This covers talks about patent pools, mandatory licencing, and techniques to
guarantee more widespread knowledge transmission.
New
Business Models and Monetization of Patents: Scholars like Shapiro (2001) and
Merges and Nelson (1990) have examined how business strategies are changing in
the digital age and how this is affecting patent law. There is interest in and
concern over the transition from conventional private methods to novel
monetization techniques including defensive patenting and patent assertion
entities.
Expecting
Legal Changes: Academics such as Cohen and Gurun (2012) and Rai and Eisenberg
(2003) have written about the necessity of legal reforms to meet the problems
presented by the digital age. A consensus that the current legal system may
need to be modified is reflected in the proposals for reforms, which vary from
modifications to patent inspection procedures to adjustments to the length and
breadth of patent protection adaptation.
Research methodology
This
study follows a doctrinal research approach, commonly referred to as
traditional research, which encompasses analytical and descriptive methods.
Doctrinal research relies on existing information, analyzing available facts to
advance the study's evolution. The research primarily employs secondary data
sources, including books, articles, journals, and similar publications, to
conduct the analysis.
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
The
complex landscape that arises from the junction of Intellectual Property Rights
(IPR) and the digital age calls for a critical examination of the current
frameworks, with a focus on patent law in particular. This analysis identifies
a number of opportunities and problems that need to be carefully considered in
order to guarantee that intellectual property protection is both effective and
flexible in the quickly changing digital world.
Rate
of Technological Advancement: The speed at which technology is developing in
the digital age has beyond the capacity of the conventional patent system to
keep up. The swift advancement of technologies like biotechnology, blockchain,
and artificial intelligence presents difficulties for examiners and patent
offices when determining whether an invention is original and not obvious.
Because of this changing environment, patents with unduly wide claims may be
issued, which could potentially rivalry and subsequent innovation.
Globalisation
and Standards Divergence: International cooperation and competitiveness have
increased as a result of globalisation, although regional differences in patent
laws still exist. Businesses that operate globally may face difficulties due to
legal complexity arising from a lack of standardisation in norms. A
sophisticated approach to global patent governance is necessary to resolve the
conflict between the requirement for uniform protection and the preservation of
jurisdiction-specific subtleties.
Open
Source Initiatives and Teamwork in Innovation: The conventional paradigm of
patents as exclusive rights is being challenged by the growth of open-source
movements and collaborative innovation. These initiatives raise concerns about
the efficacy of patents as an innovation incentive, even as they encourage
knowledge exchange and cooperative growth. A reevaluation of the position is
required due to the conflict between open collaboration and the preservation of
intellectual property of patents in promoting creativity in the era of
digitalization.
Knowledge
Accessibility and Public Interest: An important factor to take into account is
striking a balance between giving inventors exclusive rights and guaranteeing
that the general public has access to knowledge. The present patent system can
unintentionally make it more difficult to obtain necessary technologies and to
find answers to urgent global problems. To address this balance, reforms that
keep incentives for innovation high while giving the public interest first
priority are essential.
New
Business Models and Monetization of Patents: New economic models have emerged
in the digital age, such as defensive patenting and the growth of patent
assertion corporations. These methods facilitate revenue streams, but they also
raise issues related to patent trolling and impede innovation by introducing
ambiguities in the law and potential for legal action.In this regard, a
critical assessment of the patent system's effectiveness in balancing
inventors' interests with those of the larger market is necessary.
Expectations
Regarding Legal Reforms: Legal reforms are advocated by scholars and policymakers
as a means of addressing the issues that the digital age presents. Reassessing
the standards for patentability, cutting the length of patents for quickly
developing technologies, and putting in place measures to stop patent trolling
are some of the recommendations. To make sure that any modifications to the
legal framework are in line with the objectives of encouraging innovation and
advancing the public interest, a critical evaluation of these suggested reforms
is necessary.
Finally,
a critical examination of intellectual property rights (IPR) in the digital
era, with a particular emphasis on patent law, highlights the necessity of a
flexible and nuanced strategy. Keeping the exclusive rights in check To
guarantee that intellectual property protection continues to be a driving force
behind innovation in the digital age, careful modifications may be required to
balance the needs of inventors with the quickly evolving
technical landscape.
IMPLICATION FOR FINDING ON INDIA'S LEGAL
SYSTEM OF IPR IN DIGITAL AGE
It
might be necessary to modify the legal structure in order to meet the
challenges brought about by quickening technical breakthroughs and shifting
global dynamics.
Technology-Informed
Patent Examination Is Necessary:
India's
patent examination procedures desperately need to be updated to reflect the new
and sophisticated technology of the digital age. This suggests that the legal
system and patent examiners ought to possess the knowledge necessary to
evaluate the originality and non-obviousness of discoveries in cutting-edge
industries like blockchain, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence.
Maintaining a thorough examination process could need ongoing training and
working with technology experts.
Standardisation
of International Cooperation: In the digital age, international cooperation is
essential, and India's legal system ought to work towards more uniformity in
patent requirements. This suggests that To promote easier international
cooperation, technology transfer, and adherence to international trade
agreements, efforts should be undertaken to bring Indian patent rules into line
with international norms. On the international scene, this harmonisation may
facilitate a more fluid flow of inventions and knowledge.
Open
Collaboration and Patent Protection in Balance: A careful balance between
encouraging open cooperation and offering sufficient patent protection is
required in light of th the growth of open-source movements and
collaborative innovation methods. The legal system in India will need to
reconsider how patents encourage innovation while also appreciating the
advantages of information exchange. Investigating strategies that promote
teamwork without jeopardising inventors' rights may be one way to do this.
Ensuring
Public Interest and Knowledge Accessibility: India's legal system ought to take
into account the results that emphasise the the significance of striking a
balance between guaranteeing the public's access to knowledge and the exclusive
rights bestowed by patents. This suggests that in order to secure greater
availability and affordability, legal reforms that put the public interest
first must be implemented. Possible mechanisms to consider include compulsory
licencing or special provisions for technologies that are deemed vital.
Overcoming
Patent Monetization Obstacles: India's legal system ought to foresee possible
problems with defensive patenting and patent trolling in light of the rise of
new business models and difficulties in the monetization of patents. This suggests
that actions that deter abusive practises are required. These actions could
include improving the quality of patents granted, encouraging patent ownership
transparency, and opposing strategies that stifle competition and innovation.
Expecting
and Adjusting to Legislative Changes:The critical study recommends that
legislative changes could be required to handle the particular difficulties
brought up by the digital era. The legal system in India should be ready to
adjust its structure in light of these prospective adjustments. This
flexibility may entail proactive approaches to solve new problems in
intellectual property protection, stakeholder participation, and regular
assessments of current legislation. Essentially, the implications of
intellectual property rights (IPR) in the digital age for India's legal system
highlight the need to adapt to technological changes, promote international
cooperation, and strike a careful balance between upholding intellectual
property rights and furthering societal interests. A flexible and progressive
legal framework is essential to capitalise on innovation and tackle the issues
brought about by the quickly changing digital environment.
CONCLUSION
A
complex environment full of possibilities and obstacles that call for careful
analysis and adjustment. Some important ideas become apparent when we traverse
the dynamic junction of innovation, technology, and legal frameworks:
Technological
Change Requires Adjustment: Unprecedented technological developments brought
forth by the digital age are changing businesses and testing the limits of
intellectual property protection. The analysis emphasises how important it is
for legal frameworks—especially those pertaining to patents—to keep up with the
quick speed at which technology is developing. To promote innovation and
preserve the integrity of the intellectual property regime, it is critical to
make sure that patent assessment procedures and legal standards are informed by
technological advancements.
Harmonised
Standards Are Necessary for Global Collaboration: Global market interdependence
necessitates a unified approach to patent standards. Results highlight the
necessity of conformity with international standards to enable smooth
international cooperation. In addition to promoting information sharing,
harmonisation can help ensure that patent rules are applied consistently and
openly in all relevant jurisdictions.
Striking
a Balance between Patent Protection and Open Collaboration-Conventional p atent ideas
are under threat from the emergence of collaborative innovation approaches and
open-source initiatives. It is difficult to strike a balance between promoting
free and open collaboration and preserving the benefits of patent protection.
The report urges a reassessment of how patents promote innovation, taking into
account the advantages of knowledge sharing while guaranteeing the protection
of inventors' rights.
Public
Interest and Knowledge Accessibility: The critical analysis emphasises how
crucial it is to give the public interest in intellectual property protection
top priority. India's legal system, like all others, should actively look for
systems that strike a balance between limited access and exclusive rights. This
entails foreseeing and resolving concerns about accessibility, necessary
technologies, and the effects of patent awards on society.
Innovative
Business Strategies for Preventing Abuse: Concerns over possible misuse are
raised by the introduction of new business models, such as defensive patenting
and patent monetization. Legal systems need to take the initiative to prevent
actions like patent trolling that stifle innovation. The report recommends
actions to guarantee the calibre of patents, advance patent ownership
transparency, and deter actions that go against the spirit of encouraging
innovation.
Expectations
Regarding Legal Reforms: The critical study highlights the necessity of a
forward-looking legal framework in order to tackle the aforementioned
difficulties. Recognising the need for legislative changes and being ready to
is One important lesson is how the digital age is changing. Changes to patent
examination procedures, the length of patent protection, and the implementation
of mechanisms that bring patent laws into line with modern technological and
societal requirements are some examples of reforms.
Finally,
the critical examination of intellectual property rights in the digital era
issues a global call to action for legal systems to advance in step with
technical advancement. The results highlight the need for a strategy to
intellectual property protection that is fair, flexible, and international in
order to ensure that innovation keeps thriving and benefits both inventors and
society as a whole.
Roche v. Cipla (2008):
Nature:
Delhi High Court case
Significance:
The case centered on patent infringement allegations related to Erlotinib, a
cancer drug. The court held that Cipla's generic version did not infringe
Roche's patent, highlighting the importance of carefully assessing patent
claims and the scope of protection.
Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company
Ltd. (2009):
Nature:
Supreme Court of India case
Significance:
While not directly related to patents, this case dealt with design infringement
in the context of two-wheeler designs. The Supreme Court's decision provided
insights into the protection of design elements under intellectual property
laws in India.
Wockhardt Ltd. v. Torrent
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2009):
Nature:
Bombay High Court case
Significance:
The case involved patent infringement allegations related to a drug used for
the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The court addressed issues of patent
validity and infringement, providing insights into the assessment of patent
claims and the determination of infringement.
AREAS FOR FUTURE
STUDIES-
Innovations in Algorithms and Their
Patentability:
Examine
the requirements and obstacles related to patentability for algorithmic
advances in data analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
Examine how patent rules can be modified to account for the special qualities
of algorithms and their influence on the development of the digital world.
Blockchain Technology and Copyright:
Analyse
the relationship between intellectual property and blockchain technology.
Examine the ways in which blockchain technology can improve the licencing,
registration, and enforcement of patents. Examine how blockchain technology
might be used to solve problems with previous art, patent ownership, and
cooperative innovation.
Global Harmonisation of Patents:
Examine
methods to improve the harmonisation of patent laws worldwide. Analyse the
difficulties multinational corporations encounter while conducting business in
several jurisdictions and suggest solutions to simplify the patent application process,
lessen legal ambiguity, and promote more seamless cross-border cooperation.
Moral Determinationsin Emerging
Technology Patents:
Examine
the moral ramifications of patenting cutting-edge technologies like genetic
engineering, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence. Examine how ethical
considerations, responsible innovation, and striking a balance between
proprietary rights and social objectives can be incorporated into patent laws.
Patenting Strategies and Open Source
Models:
Examine
how open-source methods and collaborative innovation are changing in the
market. Examine how businesses handle patenting tactics in open-source settings
and look into the legal frameworks that support innovation and knowledge
exchange in the digital era.
Patents and Digital Twin
Technologies:
Examine
the state of patents for digital twin technologies, which create virtual
equivalents of real-world systems or items. Examine the difficulties and
possibilities associated with patenting discoveries pertaining to digital twins
and their uses in several sectors, including manufacturing, healthcare, and
urban planning.
Metrics for Quality Patents in the
digital age: Provide measures and procedures to evaluate the
calibre of patents awarded in the digital era. Examine how well patent
examination procedures assess the originality, nonobviousness, and usefulness
of inventions, especially in quickly developing technological domains.
Open innovation platforms' legal
implications: Analyse the open innovation ecosystems and platforms'
legal ramifications. Examine the ways that patent laws can assist with
collaborative innovation projects, safeguard the rights of participants, and
make it easier for intellectual property to be shared in open innovation
frameworks.
Data Security and Patent
Applications: Examine the relationship between patent
applications and data privacy rules, particularly in sectors of the economy
that mostly depend on data-driven technologies. Examine the difficulties and
remedies associated with safeguarding inventions including private or
confidential information.
Enforcing Patent Rights in Virtual
Environments: Examine the difficulties related to Enforcing
patents in virtual and augmented reality settings. Examine the ways in which
patent rules can be modified to deal with infringements, issues with prior art,
and the particular characteristics of advances in immersive technology.
REFERENCE
Cornell
University, INSEAD & WIPO (2013). Global Innovation Index (GII): the local
dynamics of innovation. Author. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/econ_stat/en/economics/gii
Cornell
University, INSEAD & WIPO (2013). Global Innovation Index (GII): the local
dynamics of innovation. Author. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/econ_stat/
en/economics/gii
Cornell
University, INSEAD & WIPO (2013). Global Innovation Index (GII): the local
dynamics of innovation. Author. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/econ_stat/
en/economics/gii
EPO (2009). India’s
Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL): A powerful tool for patent examiners.
European Patent Office. Author. Retrieved
fromhttp://www.tkdl.res.in/tkdl/TKDL_CSIR/pressrelease/press%20images/www.epo.org_topics_issues_traditional.html.pd
WIPO
(2013). 2013 World Intellectual Property Indicators. WIPO Economics &
Statistics Series. (Publication No. 941E/2013). Geneva: WIPO Publication. WIPO.
Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/wipi/index.html
World
Intellectual Property Organisation, (2008). The oncept of Intellectual
property. In W.I.P Organization, WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy,
Law and Use (2ND edition ed,pp3-6) Geneva : WIPO Publication.
Govt. of
India Annual Report of Controller General of patents, Designs & Trade Marks
(CGPDTM) Author. Retrieved from http://www.ipindia.nic.in/
Jishnu,
Latha (2014 March 16-28). Patently absurd: patently hollow claims of the US
Down to Earth,51.
Lucchi,
Nicola (2005). Intellectual Property rights in digital media: a comparartive
analysis of legal protection, technological measures, and new business models
under EU and US law Buffalo Law Revuew, 53(4), 102-183.
European
patent office (EPO). Author. Retrieved from
http://www.epo.org/searching/asian/trends.html
Article Information
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF IPR IN DIGITAL AGE-SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PATENT BY: PREETI BHAGAT
Authors: PREETI BHAGAT
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2023/11/18
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.