Open Access Research Article
BERNE CONVENTION AND RELATED AGREEMENTS
Published Paper
Article Details
BERNE
CONVENTION AND RELATED AGREEMENTS
AUTHORED BY
- ASHISH SHUKLA
Introduction:
In British
legal parlance “Copyright” is the term used to describe the area of Intellectual
property law that regulates the creation and use that is made of a range of
cultural goods such as books, songs, films, and computer programs[1].
The intangible property protected by copyright law is distinctive in that it
arises automatically for the benefit of author[2].
Various rights are conferred upon on the owner of copyright, including the
right to copy the work and the right to perform the work in public. The primary
rights that are currently granted to copyright
owners are set out in sections 16-21 of the 1988 Act. Anyone who carries out any of these activities, or authorizes
someone else to carry out these activities is liable for primary infringement. The rights
vested in the owner are limited,
notably in that they are not infringed when a person copies or
performs a work that they have created themselves. The rights given to a
copyright owner last for a considerable time: in many cases for Seventy years
after the death of the author of the work. The Basic framework of British copyright law is largely
to be found in the copyright,
Designs and Patents Act 1988, as amended, as amended, most significantly to
implement European Community directives. While aspects of copyright law have a long history,
copyright law did not take on its modern meaning
as a discrete area of law
that grants rights in work of literature and art until at least the
mid-nineteenth century. Moreover, it was not until the passage of the 1911
copyright Act that copyright law was rationalised and codified into the type of
modern, abstract, and forward-looking statute. The 1911 Act was also important
insofar as it abolished common law copyright in unpublished works and also
repealed the plethora of subject-specifics statutes that existed at the time.
In their place the 1911 Act established a single code which conferred copyright
protection at number of works whether published or not, and including many
unprotectable works such as architecture , sound recordings, and films[3]. In most cases,
protection lasted for fifty years after
the death of the author of the work[4]. At the same time, 1911 Act abandoned all requirements concerning formalities. Infringement was also expanded to include translations and adaptation as well
as reproductions ‘in a material form’. Following a review by the Gregory
Committee in 1952, the 1911 copyright Act
was replaced by the 1956 copyright Act.
This extended the scope of the copyright to encompass sound
and television broadcasts, as well as
typographical formats of published editions. Along with sound recordings
and films which were now recognized as having copyright in their own right,
these new rights were placed in a special category in Part II of the 1956 Act.
Author’s rights
and Neighbouring Rights:
While British
copyright law abandoned the formal distinction between different categories of
works with the passage of the 1988 Act, nonetheless an informal distinction is
still drawn between two general categories of subject matter. More especially a
distinction is drawn between what are known as ‘authorial work’ and ‘entrepreneurial works’. Authors work refer to work created by ‘author’ such as books,
plays, music, art, and films. In contrast
neighbouring rights which are sometimes called
‘related rights’ or ‘droit voisins’
refer to ‘works’
created by ‘entrepreneurs’ such as sound
recordings, broadcast, cable programmes, and the typographical format of published editions. The rationale for differentiating
between these two categories of
subject matter lies in the fact that neighbouring or entrepreneurial rights are
typically derivative, in the sense that they use or develop
existing authorial works;
that they are product
of technical and organizational skill
rather than authorial
skill; and that rights are initially given not to human creator, but to the
body or person that was financially and organizationally responsible for
production of the material. The history of copyright is a complex, subtle, and
rich subject. Depending on one’s interest it is possible
to highlight many different themes
and trend. Most of histories of copyright law tend to focus on the
origin of copyright, which are usually traced back to the 1710 Statute of Anne, or occasionally to the practices
developed in sixteenth century to regulate the book of trade. The 1911 Act was also amended on a number of
occasion, primarily to take account of new technologies such as cable
television and computer software. A further periodic review by the Whitford Committee in 1977 proposed a
general revision of 1956 Act[5].
Evolution of Copyright Act in India;
Over a period of more than 150 years,
India saw a slow development of modern copyright law. In 1841, the British India Company enacted a law that
brought copyright to India . The 1847 enactment stated that the copyright was in effect
for the author's lifetime plus seven years after
death. The government might issue a forced licence to publish a work if the
copyright owner refused to permit its publication upon the author's death, but
in no instance could the entire term of copyright exceed 42 years.
The Indian
Copyright Act, which
was largely modelled
after the British
Copyright Act of 1912,
was introduced by the British government in 1914 with the goal of strengthening
copyright rules in India. The Indian government enacted the Copyright Act, 1957
following independence, superseding the earlier legislation and providing a
more extensive framework. The international copyright agreement known
as the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic
Works had a significant influence on this measure.
The Copyright Act, 2012
has undergone five updates between 1983 and 1999. The most recent revolutionary amendment was
approved by the president of India
on June 7, 2012, and was
notified on June 8, 2012, following the parliament's ratification on May 22, 2012. The copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 was published in the official
gazette and went into effect
on June 21, 2012. The Act
has 79 sections spread across 15 chapters. The WIPO Performances and Phonograms
Treaty ("WPPT") and the WIPO Copyright Treaty ("WCT"), two
WIPO internet treaties signed in 1996, have been brought into compliance with
the Act primarily for the following reasons: to protect and address the concerns of the music and
film industry; to address the concerns of the
physically disabled and to protect the interests of the author of any work; to
make incidental changes; to remove operational facilities; and to enforce rights.
Because the British
Copyright Act of 1842, which did not adequately address the rights of
Indian authors, had a significant influence on the first copyright act in
India, which was passed in 1847, the UK copyright act and the Indian copyright
laws are extremely relevant.
Need for Berne Convention:
·
The copyright of literary
and creative works was covered
by national laws passed by a
number of nations before the Berne Convention was established. There
were conceptual variances in
these national laws that resulted in disparities between the copyright regimes of various nations.
All national copyright laws, despite their
diversity, had one fundamental characteristic in common:
they were exclusive to the countries in which they were implemented. Thus, copyright protection for domestic works was
limited to their home nations. These pieces were, nevertheless, also exported
to other nations.
·
Numerous nations signed
bilateral agreements requiring the signatories to acknowledge
and uphold the copyrights granted by the contracting states. The fact that
these agreements were neither consistent nor thorough, however, was a
significant disadvantage.
·
An international copyright framework that could
promote international cooperation was therefore thought to be necessary. The Berne Convention was subsequently signed
as a result, promoting global
cooperation for copyright protection.
·
BERNE CONVENTION (1886 – 1971);
The most
important international influence on the development of UK copyright has been
the Berne Convention on the protection of Literary and Artistic Works. The Berne Convention was drawn up in 1886 as a small treaty
allowing for mutual recognition of rights amongst a few largely European
countries. Since then, the treaty has been revised on a number of occasion[6],
and the membership expanded to 151 states[7].
In its
earliest form, there were two key provisions of the Berne Convention. The first
was the adoption of the principle of national treatment. This meant that with
certain exceptions a country of the Union should not discriminate between its own nationals and those of others countries of the Union. For, example, under the principle of
national treatment, French law was obliged to confer the same rights on a British author as it conferred on French authors. In addition to principle of
national treatment, the Berne Convention has long required that the ‘enjoyment
and exercise’ of copyright in the works of the Convention should not be
‘subject to any formality’. This means that registration or notices cannot be
made prerequisites for protection.[8]
Because international protection is to be automatic, there is no need for
international bureaucratic regimes to simplify registration process.
Over time the
Berne Convention has come to demand that members of the Union provide certain
minimum standards of protection to copyright owners and authors. These includes
the Right to reproduce the work,[9] to perform the work publicly,[10] to translate the works , to adapt the work, and to broadcast the work, Members
of unions are also to give author
the moral rights of attribution and integrity. In
recognition of the need for the public to be able to utilize work without payment,
there is limited
scope for members
of union to create exceptions. In relation to the
reproduction right, this exception must satisfy the so-called three-steps.
What type of copyright protection does it offer:
·
For all tangible
works, the Berne Convention stipulates a minimum 50-year
protection period following the author's death. The photographic and
cinematographic works are the only ones that are exempt from the protection term. Here, a photograph's minimum protection time is 25 years from
the year it was taken, while a cinematographer's minimum protection period is
50 years from the date of production or publishing.
·
The agreement guarantees that these artists' rights
will always be with them. Additionally, the Berne Convention guarantees authors and artists
the right to exercise
control over how their masterpieces are reproduced, altered, and distributed. In addition to
providing a framework for a uniform and impartial method of acknowledging the
copyright of works created in other nations,
the international agreement
requires member nations to provide a minimum level of performance and pursue specific provisions for the enforcement of
copyright laws.
Fundamental principles of Berne Convention:
1. The Berne
Convention's first and fundamental principle addresses the equal status of
creative works that originate in a contracting state with regard to protection.
2. The
automatic protection of all works, independent of any legal requirements for
protection, is upheld by the second principle of the Berne Convention. This
indicates that publishers and authors are free to use the copyright sign without any restrictions or qualifications. To be safe, ensure
that it is enforced, and stop worrying about infringement, it is advisable
to register a copyright. Naturally, this would also offer you a number of unique benefits.
3. With a few exceptions, the treaty's ultimate
principle protects literary
and artistic works regardless of the protection
provisions in the nation where the work was first created.
Rights of the authors
under Berne Convention:
o According to Article 5, the authors
of works covered
by the Convention are entitled
to all the rights granted to their nationalities by the laws of the
member nations of the Union. As a result, the writers are protected by
copyright in all Union member states under the national laws that apply in each
of those states. There will be no formalities associated with the protection.
o As a
result, the Convention requires its parties to grant both domestic and foreign
authors the same level of copyright protection. Nonetheless, the Union's
member states have the autonomy
to decide on the level of
protection to be granted to the
writers and the kind of
recourse that they can access.
o The right
of the writers to translate their works is stipulated in Article 8. They might
even give someone else permission to translate or copy their writings.
o The right
of authors to give permission for their theatrical and musical works to be
performed in public exists. They might also give their permission for their works to be televised for public consumption or to
be adapted for the big screen.
TRIPS Agreement:
An
international legal agreement between all of the World Trade Organization's
member nations is known as the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights, or TRIPS (WTO). It sets baseline requirements for how national
governments regulate various types of intellectual property
(IP) in relation to citizens
of other WTO members. TRIPS, which
is overseen by the WTO, was negotiated at the Uruguay Round of the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1989 and 1990.
TRIPS
specifically mandates that WTO members provide copyright rights for writers,
other copyright holders, and holders of related rights, such as broadcasting
organisations, sound recording producers, and performers; additionally, members must provide
copyright rights for geographical indications, industrial
designs, integrated circuit layout designs, patents, new plant varieties,
trademarks, trade names, and proprietary or undisclosed information. TRIPS
delineates protocols for enforcement, remedies, and dispute settlement. All
intellectual property rights must be protected and upheld in a way that balances
rights and responsibilities, fosters technological innovation, transfers and disseminates technology for the benefit
of both technology producers
and users, and promotes social and economic welfare.
The most
extensive multilateral agreement on intellectual property to date is the TRIPS
agreement, which brought intellectual property law into the multilateral trade
system for the first time. Worried that affluent nations were interpreting
TRIPS too narrowly, developing nations started a series of negotiations in 2001 that produced the Doha Declaration. The WTO specifies the scope of TRIPS in the Doha Declaration, which states, among other things,
that the objective "to promote access
to medicines for all" can and should
be taken into consideration when interpreting
TRIPS.
Implementation in Developing Country:
While all member states
are subject to the same requirements under TRIPS, developing nations have been given an extension to amend their national
legislation in two stages based on their level of development. For developing
nations, the transitional period ended in 2005. For pharmaceutical patents,
the transition period
to apply TRIPS
for least developed countries was
extended to January 1, 2016, and it may be further extended until 2013.
Therefore, it has been claimed that the TRIPS standard, which mandates
that all nations have stringent intellectual property
laws, will harm the development of less developed nations. There has
been a claim made that most developing countries, if not all of them, would
benefit strategically from using TRIPS's flexibility to enact the weakest IP
rules possible.
For the most part,
this has not occurred. Many developing nations
have not fully
implemented Doha-authorized TRIPS flexibilities, such as mandatory
licencing, parallel importation, data protection limits, broad research use and
other patentability exceptions, into their legal frameworks, according to a WHO
report from 2005. This is probably because developing nations frequently either
directly copy the intellectual property laws of developed nations or rely on technical assistance from the World Intellectual Property
Organisation (WIPO), which critics like Cory Doctorow claim
encourages them to impose stronger intellectual property monopolies, due to a
lack of legal and technical expertise required to draft legislation that
implements flexibilities.
Post TRIPS Expansion:
Many countries
have entered into bilateral agreements to adopt a higher degree of protection
in addition to the baseline intellectual property requirements established
under the TRIPS agreement. These standards, sometimes referred to as TRIPS+ or
TRIPS-Plus, come in a variety of formats. The following are some of these
agreements' general goals:
·
The enactment of anti-circumvention legislation to
safeguard DRM systems. The WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty and the 1996
World Intellectual Property Organisation Copyright Treaty (WIPO Treaty) made
this possible.
·
More stringent restrictions on patent forced licences.
·
A more vigorous approach to patent enforcement. More
widely, this endeavour has been noted in draft WIPO and EU regulations on the
protection of intellectual property. The WIPO Copyright Treaty of 1996 was put
into effect by the EU Copyright Directive of 2001.
·
The effort to draft a WIPO Broadcasting Treaty, which
would grant broadcasters (and maybe webcasters) the only right to disseminate
copies of works they have produced.
WIPO Copyright
Treaty:
The WCT was viewed
in the early phases of discussions as an update to the Berne Convention, which had been in effect
since the Stockholm Conference in 1971. The WCT was conceived of as an extra
treaty that complemented the Berne Convention, but, because any modification to
the Berne Convention required the unanimous agreement of all parties.[8] The
TRIPS Agreement was the outcome of the forum being moved to the GATT following
the breakdown of negotiations over the extension of the Berne Convention in the 1980.As a result, the World Intellectual Property Organization's copyright treaties became
far more focused
on addressing the issues
brought up by digital technology.
The WCT
asserts the value of copyright protection for creative activities and
highlights its incentive-based character. It guarantees that databases' content
structure and selection are protected (Article 5), and
computer programmes are protected
as literary works (Article 4). In contrast to what may otherwise be the case under the Berne Convention alone, it grants
authors of works authority over its rental and distribution in Articles
6 to 8. Additionally, it forbids altering rights management data included in works in an unauthorised manner (Article 12) and
evading technological safeguards for the preservation of works (Article 11).
Critics point out that the treaty is too broad,
for example, prohibiting circumvention of technical protection measures
even when done so to pursue legal and fair use rights,
and that it applies a "one size fits all" standard
to all signatory nations, even though their levels of economic development and
knowledge industries are very different.
Implementation of WIPO Treaty:
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) incorporates the WIPO Copyright Treaty into US law.
The European Community's representative, the Council of the European Union,
adopted the treaty on March 16, 2000, with Decision 2000/278/EC. The European
Union has several directives that address copyright protection in software,
databases, and devices that circumvent "technical protection
measures" like digital rights management (DRM). These directives, together
with Directive 91/250/EC, provide a substantial body of law covering the
subject matter of the treaty.
WIPO Performance and Phonograms Treaty:
The World
Intellectual Property Organization's member nations have signed the WIPO
Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), which was ratified in Geneva on
December 20, 1996. It became operative on May 20, 2002. August
2023 saw 112 contracting parties
sign the pact.
The goal of
WPPT's adoption was to create and uphold the most efficient and standardised
approach to the protection of phonogram artists'
and producers' rights.
The Rome Convention, which was signed on October
26, 1961, and established an international convention for the protection of performers, phonogram producers, and broadcasting organisations, would not be
affected by this treaty. Similar
duties to contracting nations are imposed
on phonogram makers and performers by Articles
18 and 19 of the WPPT, as they are under Articles
11 and 12 of the WCT.
Implementation of WIPO Performance and phonograms Duties:
The Digital
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a 1998 U.S. statute, includes the WIPO
Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties Implementation Act. It is
divided into two main sections: Section 102, which carries out the WIPO
Copyright Treaty's requirements, and Section 103, which, with certain
exceptions, arguably offers more protection against copy prevention system
circumvention and forbids the removal of copyright management data.
Case laws :
o In the Union of India v. Amarnath Sehgal case (2005). In
this instance, the plaintiff had sold the Indian government a mural that was to
be seen in the Vigyan Bhawan. After that, the mural was removed by the government from Vigyan Bhawan
and placed in a store. The
mistreatment by the authorities has also caused harm to the mural. The
petitioner argued that his moral rights had been violated by the mural's
mistreatment. Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, which requires the member nations
to uphold the moral
rights of copyright holders, was cited by the Court. As a result,
the Court decided that the petitioner was qualified
to get the mural back in exchange for some compensation.
o The
question on the table in Raj Rewal v.
Union of India (2019) was whether an architect with copyright over a
building might prevent the person who owns the land the structure is built
on from tearing
it down. The Court decided
that an architect's moral rights are subordinated to the demands of urban planning.
The moral rights of the architect are subordinated to the technical and
financial requirements that demand alterations to a building. The Court came to
the conclusion that the landowner is fully entitled to remove or demolish any
construction that has been erected on the property. The landowner's rights are
not superseded by the architect's moral rights.
Conclusion:
The Berne
Convention's goal is to provide a standardised, efficient system for defending
writers' rights to their literary and creative creations.
The goal of the Berne Convention's revision process was to ensure that it was always up to date
with the latest developments and demands. But since 1971, the Convention has not undergone any significant modifications. Therefore, given the quick
expansion of digital
publications, the Convention
does not sufficiently address the concerns of the copyright holders.
[1] For an analysis of various other
perspectives on copyright, see P.Goldstein, ‘Copyright’ (1990-91) 38 Journal of
the copyright society of the USA 109
[2] The author of a work is defined in the 1988 Act, “As
the person who creates the work.”
[3] Films were protected as
‘photographs’, without prejudice to copyright in the dramatic works embodied in
films. Sound recordings were deemed to musical works: CA 1911 s.19.
[4] Literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works other
than photographs, which received a term of fifty years from making.
[5] Report of the committee on Copyright and Design Law
(cmnd.6732 ,1977).
[6] The last revision was at Paris on 24 Jul.1971, and
amended on 28 Sept.1979.
[7] As of 15 Oct. 2003. The convention applies to all
works in which copyright has not expired at the time of accession to the
convention : Berne Art.18
[8] Berne Art. 5(2). For consideration
as to whether the requirement of assertion of the right of attribution complies
with this.
[9] Berne Art. 9. (countries to
recognize the exclusive right of authorizing the reproduction of works ‘in any
manner or form’; Art. 9(3). Specifically states that a sound or visual
recording is considered a reproduction.
[10] Berne Art.11 (For Dramatic, dramatico-musical, and
musical works); Art.11 ter (public recitation and communication of literary
work.)
Article Information
BERNE CONVENTION AND RELATED AGREEMENTS
Authors: ASHISH SHUKLA
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/04/01
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.