Open Access Research Article
AN INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE AND PRINCIPLES OF GLOBAL JUSTICE
Published Paper
Article Details
AN INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE AND
PRINCIPLES OF GLOBAL JUSTICE
AUTHORED BY - ANNIE WILSON,
Assistant Professor of Law, AALC, Kerala
Abstract
International
law jurisprudence represents the intricate framework through which legal
principles and precedents are interpreted and applied in the realm of global
governance. This study delves into the multifaceted dimensions of international
law jurisprudence, examining its role in shaping legal norms, resolving
disputes, and promoting justice within the international community. By
analyzing the methodologies employed by international courts and tribunals,
alongside the influence of legal scholars and the application of equitable
principles, this research paper shed light on the pivotal factors that
contribute to the evolution of international law jurisprudence. Through a
comprehensive exploration of the interpretive techniques utilized in
international legal instruments, and teleological approaches in deciphering the
intricate nuances of international legal provisions. It underscores the vital
role of stare decisis in establishing consistent legal precedents and fostering
a coherent jurisprudential framework that guides future interpretations and
applications of international law.
This paper
delves into the impact of scholarly contributions in shaping international law
jurisprudence, emphasizing the role of legal scholars in advancing the
discourse on complex legal issues and promoting the development of legal
theories that inform the interpretation and application of international law.
It explores the influence of equity and proportionality in guiding the
decision-making processes of international courts and tribunals, ensuring that
the application of international law remains grounded in principles of fairness
and justice, especially in contexts such as armed conflict and the use of
force.
By
illuminating the dynamic and evolving nature of international law
jurisprudence, this research paper emphasizes its critical role in fostering a
more just and equitable global legal system. The insights presented herein
contribute to a deeper understanding of the complexities inherent in the
interpretation and application of international law, highlighting the
significance of jurisprudential considerations in promoting peace, justice, and
the rule of law on the global stage.
1. Introduction
International
law, as a cornerstone of global governance, plays a pivotal role in promoting
peace, stability, and justice among nations. It serves as a framework that
regulates the conduct of states, international organizations, and individuals
in their interactions within the international community. Its primary objective
is to establish norms, principles, and standards that govern a wide array of
issues, including human rights, armed conflict, trade, the environment, and
diplomacy. Central to the concept of international law is the pursuit of global
justice, which seeks to ensure fairness, equity, and the protection of
fundamental human rights on a global scale.
The origins
of modern international law can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where
customary practices and treaties governed relations between states and empires.
However, it was not until the aftermath of the two world wars that the need for
a comprehensive legal framework to prevent future conflicts and uphold global
justice gained prominence. The establishment of the United Nations in 1945
marked a significant milestone in the development of international law,
providing a platform for states to collaborate on issues of mutual concern and
work towards the promotion of international peace and security.
One of the
fundamental principles that underpins international law is the concept of
sovereign equality among states. This principle recognizes the autonomy and
independence of each state, irrespective of its size, population, or economic
prowess. It serves as a cornerstone for the peaceful coexistence of nations and
underscores the importance of mutual respect and non-interference in the
internal affairs of sovereign states. By upholding the principle of sovereign
equality, international law aims to foster a global environment conducive to
cooperation, mutual understanding, and collective progress.
Moreover,
the promotion of human rights and the protection of vulnerable populations lie
at the heart of international law and global justice. International human
rights law sets forth a comprehensive framework that safeguards the inherent
dignity and worth of every individual, regardless of race, religion, gender, or
socioeconomic status. It enshrines fundamental rights such as the right to
life, liberty, and security, as well as the right to freedom of expression,
association, and a fair trial. Through various international conventions,
declarations, and judicial mechanisms, international law seeks to hold states
accountable for human rights violations and atrocities, thereby advocating for
a more just and equitable global society. The regulation of armed conflict and
the prevention of war form essential components of international law and global
justice. The principles of humanitarian law and the Geneva Conventions aim to
minimize the suffering of civilians and combatants during armed conflicts,
establishing guidelines for the humane treatment of prisoners of war, the
protection of civilians, and the prohibition of the use of certain weapons.
In the
realm of global trade and commerce, international economic law seeks to promote
fair and equitable economic relations among states, fostering mutual prosperity
and sustainable development. It encompasses a wide range of issues, including
trade agreements, intellectual property rights, investment protection, and the
regulation of multinational corporations. By establishing transparent and
predictable rules for international trade, international economic law aims to
create a level playing field for all states and facilitate the integration of
economies for the collective benefit of the global community.
2. The Legal
Nature of International Law
The legal
nature of international law is a complex and multifaceted concept that has been
subject to significant debate among legal scholars and practitioners. At its
core, international law is a system of rules and principles that govern the
relations between states and other international actors, shaping the conduct of
nations in the global arena. Its unique characteristics, including its
decentralized enforcement mechanisms and the voluntary nature of its
application, have led to ongoing discussions about its status as a
fully-fledged legal system.
International
law operates within a decentralized framework where there is no centralized
authority with the power to enforce its provisions. Unlike domestic legal
systems, there is no global legislature or judiciary with comprehensive
jurisdiction over all states. Instead, international law relies heavily on the
consent and compliance of states, making it a predominantly voluntary system[1].
This feature has led some skeptics to question its true legal nature, arguing
that it lacks the essential elements of a traditional legal system, such as a
centralized enforcement mechanism and a supreme law-making authority.
However,
proponents of international law contend that despite its unique
characteristics, it does possess certain legal attributes. First and foremost,
international law is founded upon the consent of states, which is often
expressed through treaties, custom, and general principles recognized by
civilized nations. Treaties serve as the primary source of international law,
with states willingly entering into agreements that bind them to specific
obligations and responsibilities[2].
Additionally, customary international law emerges from consistent state
practices that are accepted as legally binding, even in the absence of an
explicit treaty. These sources, along with general principles of law recognized
by nations, contribute to the development of a cohesive legal framework that
governs state behavior[3].
Moreover,
the existence of international tribunals and judicial bodies, such as the
International Court of Justice (ICJ) and various international criminal
tribunals, further supports the legal nature of international law[4].
These institutions play a crucial role in interpreting and applying
international legal norms, resolving disputes between states, and holding
individuals accountable for serious international crimes. While their
jurisdiction is not universal and relies on the consent of states, their
existence underscores the growing recognition of international law as a
legitimate and binding legal system. Furthermore, the principle of pacta sunt
servanda, which requires states to fulfill their treaty obligations in good
faith, reinforces the legal character of international agreements[5].
Violations of these obligations can lead to diplomatic repercussions or the
imposition of sanctions by the international community, highlighting the
significance of compliance with international legal norms. States are expected
to adhere to the terms of treaties they have ratified, and failure to do so may
result in diplomatic repercussions or the imposition of sanctions by the
international community[6].
This principle highlights the importance of respecting and upholding the
commitments made under international law, thereby reinforcing its binding
character.
While the
decentralized and consensual nature of international law has led some to
question its legal status, the existence of recognized sources, international
judicial institutions, and the principle of pacta sunt servanda provide strong
evidence for its legal nature[7].
International law continues to evolve and adapt to the complexities of an
increasingly interconnected global community, playing a vital role in promoting
cooperation, resolving disputes, and upholding fundamental principles of
justice and human rights on the international stage[8].
3. Fundamental
aspect of Customary International Law
Customary
international law is a fundamental aspect of the global legal system, playing a
crucial role in governing the behavior of states and international actors. It emerges
from consistent state practices undertaken out of a sense of legal obligation,
known as opinio juris, and represents a critical source of international law
alongside treaties and general principles. Understanding the nature and
elements of customary international law is essential in comprehending the norms
that guide state conduct and interactions in the international arena[9].
The
formation of customary international law is a gradual process that requires
widespread and consistent state practice over time[10].
It arises from the general acceptance and recognition of certain practices as
legally binding among states, even in the absence of a formal treaty. These
practices may encompass a wide range of activities, including diplomatic
protocols, territorial boundaries, and the treatment of prisoners of war, among
others. Over time, these customary practices become legally binding, forming an
integral part of the international legal framework. The two central elements
necessary for the establishment of customary international law are state
practice and opinio juris. State practice refers to the consistent and
widespread behavior of states, indicating their acceptance of a certain norm as
legally obligatory. This practice must be both extensive and representative of
a general state consensus, demonstrating that the behavior in question is not
merely an isolated incident but rather a customary practice recognized by the
international community.
Opinio
juris, on the other hand, refers to the belief or sense of legal obligation
that accompanies state practice. It signifies that states engage in certain
actions not merely out of habit or convenience but because they consider these
actions to be legally binding. Opinio juris is crucial in distinguishing
customary practices from ordinary habits or political preferences[11].
It reflects the conviction that the practice in question is obligatory under
international law, thereby contributing to the formation of a customary norm.
Additionally, the persistent objector rule serves as an exception to the
formation of customary international law[12].
According to this rule, if a state consistently objects to a particular
practice on the basis that it is not bound by it, despite widespread state
practice and opinio juris, that state may not be bound by the emerging
customary norm[13].
This exception recognizes the importance of respecting the sovereignty and
autonomy of individual states, especially in cases where a state expressly
rejects a developing customary norm. Also, the International Court of Justice
(ICJ) and other international tribunals play a significant role in determining
the existence and content of customary international law. They often consider
state practice and opinio juris when interpreting and applying customary norms,
thereby contributing to the development and clarification of customary
international law in various areas, including human rights, the law of the sea,
and the laws of armed conflict.
Customary
international law serves as a vital component of the global legal system,
reflecting the shared practices and beliefs of states regarding their
international legal obligations. It is essential in addressing issues not
covered by treaties and contributes to the development of consistent and
universally recognized standards of conduct in the international community.
Understanding its formation and elements is crucial for comprehending the
dynamics and complexities of international law and global governance.
4. Binding
Nature of International Law and Justice
The binding
nature of international law is a central aspect of the global legal system,
serving as the foundation for regulating the conduct of states, international
organizations, and other actors in the international arena. While international
law operates within a decentralized framework, it is characterized by various
mechanisms that establish its binding nature and ensure compliance with its
provisions[14].
Understanding these mechanisms is essential to appreciate the role of
international law in promoting global order, stability, and cooperation.
International
law derives its binding nature from the consent of states, which is often
expressed through treaties, customary practices, and general principles
recognized by the international community[15].
Treaties serve as formal agreements between states and international
organizations, creating legally binding obligations that parties must adhere to
in good faith. These agreements can encompass a wide range of issues, including
human rights, trade, environmental protection, and the laws of war, among
others. States voluntarily enter into treaties, thereby demonstrating their
commitment to upholding the rights and responsibilities outlined within these
legal instruments.
Additionally,
customary international law, which emerges from consistent state practices and
a shared belief in their legal obligation, serves as another source of binding
norms. States engage in certain practices out of a sense of legal duty,
contributing to the development of customary norms that are considered binding
within the international community. This demonstrates the voluntary acceptance
of legal obligations by states, even in the absence of explicit treaty
provisions.
Moreover,
the role of international courts and tribunals, such as the International Court
of Justice (ICJ) and various specialized international criminal tribunals,
contributes to the enforcement and interpretation of international legal norms[16].
These judicial bodies play a crucial role in resolving disputes between states,
adjudicating on matters of international law, and holding individuals and
entities accountable for violations of international norms. Their decisions and
rulings serve as authoritative interpretations of international law, guiding
states in their adherence to binding legal obligations.
In cases of
non-compliance, the international community may resort to diplomatic measures,
economic sanctions, or collective actions to enforce compliance with
international law[17].
The United Nations Security Council, for instance, can authorize coercive
measures, including sanctions and the use of force, to address threats to
international peace and security. These measures underscore the commitment of
the international community to uphold the binding nature of international law
and promote the peaceful resolution of conflicts.
The binding
nature of international law is upheld through the voluntary consent of states,
the principles of treaty obligations, the development of customary norms, and
the role of international judicial institutions. While the enforcement of
international law may face challenges due to the decentralized nature of the
international system, the commitment of states to adhere to their legal
obligations and the enforcement mechanisms established by the international
community serve to reinforce the binding character of international law. By
upholding these principles, states can contribute to the promotion of global
peace, security, and cooperation within the international community.
5. Light on Jurisprudence
of International law: The Way Forward
The
jurisprudence of international law sheds light on the interpretive and
analytical framework that governs the application and development of legal
principles within the realm of global governance. As a dynamic and evolving
field, it encompasses the study of legal precedents, judicial decisions, and
scholarly interpretations that shape the evolution of international legal norms
and standards. By examining the methodologies employed by international courts
and tribunals, the role of legal scholars, and the influence of equitable
principles, the jurisprudence of international law provides a comprehensive
understanding of the complexities and nuances inherent in the interpretation
and application of global legal norms. International law jurisprudence refers
to the principles, theories, and practices that govern the interpretation and
application of international law. It encompasses the study of legal precedents,
judicial decisions, and scholarly writings that shape the evolution and
understanding of international legal norms. Given the diverse and complex
nature of international law, its jurisprudence plays a critical role in
clarifying ambiguities, resolving disputes, and establishing consistent
standards of behavior in the global arena.
One of the
key elements of international law jurisprudence is the interpretation of
international legal instruments, including treaties, conventions, and customary
law. International courts and tribunals, such as the International Court of
Justice (ICJ), the International Criminal Court (ICC), and various specialized
international tribunals, employ various methods of interpretation, including
textual, contextual, and teleological approaches, to ascertain the meaning and
scope of international legal provisions. These interpretations serve as
precedents that guide the application of international law in subsequent cases,
contributing to the development of a coherent and consistent body of
jurisprudence. Furthermore, the principle of stare decisis, though not strictly
binding in the international legal system, holds significant influence in the
development of international law jurisprudence[18].
The decisions and opinions rendered by international courts and tribunals often
serve as persuasive authorities for future cases, shaping the understanding of
legal principles and norms within the international community. As a result, the
establishment of consistent precedents and the clarification of legal
ambiguities contribute to the progressive development of international law
jurisprudence. In addition to judicial decisions, the writings of legal
scholars and practitioners play a crucial role in shaping international law
jurisprudence. Moreover, the works of prominent scholars often influence the
decision-making processes of international courts and tribunals, thus
contributing to the evolution of international law jurisprudence.
The concept
of equity is another important aspect of international law jurisprudence. In
cases where there is a gap or ambiguity in the application of legal norms,
principles of equity and fairness often guide the decision-making process. The
principle of equity allows international courts and tribunals to consider the
broader context and underlying principles of justice in their deliberations,
ensuring that the application of international law remains just and equitable
in addressing complex international disputes and legal controversies[19].
Moreover,
the principle of proportionality plays a significant role in international law
jurisprudence, especially in the context of armed conflict and the use of
force. International courts and tribunals often assess the proportionality of
actions taken by states in relation to the objectives pursued, ensuring that
the use of force remains within the limits prescribed by international law[20].
The application of the principle of proportionality serves to safeguard
fundamental human rights and prevent unnecessary harm and suffering during
armed conflicts, thereby contributing to the development of a more humane and
just international legal framework. International law jurisprudence serves as a
dynamic and evolving field that shapes the interpretation, application, and
development of international legal norms.
6. Global
Justice and Role of International Law in Fostering Equitable International
Relations
In an
increasingly interconnected world, the concept of global justice has emerged as
a crucial paradigm for promoting fairness, equality, and human rights across
national boundaries. Central to the realization of global justice is the
indispensable role played by international law, serving as a guiding framework
for the conduct of states and fostering a more equitable international order.
This research paper delves into the multifaceted dimensions of global justice
and elucidates the pivotal role of international law in shaping and
safeguarding the principles of justice on a global scale.
7. Understanding
Global Justice
Global
justice, at its core, embodies the pursuit of fairness and the protection of
human dignity on a global scale. It transcends national boundaries and
emphasizes the inherent rights and equality of all individuals, irrespective of
their nationality, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. The principles of global
justice encompass the promotion of human rights, the eradication of poverty and
inequality, the pursuit of environmental sustainability, and the establishment
of a more inclusive and just international economic order[21].
It acknowledges the interconnectedness of diverse global challenges,
recognizing that issues such as climate change, armed conflicts, and
socio-economic disparities require comprehensive, cooperative solutions at the
international level.
8. The Role of
International Law in Promoting Global Justice
International
law serves as the cornerstone for regulating state conduct, promoting peaceful
relations, and safeguarding human rights and fundamental freedoms on a global
scale. It provides a comprehensive legal framework that governs the behavior of
states and establishes norms and principles that guide interactions between
nations. Through international treaties, conventions, and customary
international law, it addresses critical issues such as the protection of human
rights, the prevention of armed conflicts, the regulation of international
trade, and the preservation of the global environment[22].
By providing a common ground for states to engage in diplomacy, negotiations,
and dispute resolution, international law plays a pivotal role in fostering a
more just and equitable international order.
9. Enforcing
Global Justice through International Law
One of the
critical challenges in realizing global justice lies in the effective
enforcement of international legal norms and standards. Despite the existence
of international legal mechanisms, the enforcement of international law often
faces obstacles due to the sovereignty of states and the limitations of
international institutions. However, the establishment of international courts
and tribunals, such as the International Court of Justice and the International
Criminal Court, has significantly contributed to the enforcement of
international law and the promotion of global justice[23].
These institutions play a crucial role in adjudicating disputes between states,
addressing human rights violations, and holding perpetrators of international
crimes accountable, thereby fostering a culture of accountability and justice
on the global stage.
10.
Mitigating Challenges through Collective Action
The
complexity of global justice issues, including transnational crimes,
environmental degradation, and socio-economic inequalities, requires concerted
efforts and collective action from the international community. Strengthening
international cooperation, promoting dialogue, and fostering partnerships among
states, international organizations, and non-state actors are essential for
addressing these challenges effectively. The role of international law in
facilitating diplomatic negotiations, conflict resolution, and the formulation
of international agreements is instrumental in fostering a culture of
cooperation and consensus-building, thereby paving the way for the promotion of
global justice and the realization of a more equitable and sustainable world.
11.
Embracing a Holistic Approach
To ensure
the effective implementation of global justice principles, it is imperative to
adopt a holistic approach that integrates legal, political, economic, and
social dimensions. This entails incorporating the perspectives and voices of
marginalized communities, prioritizing the protection of vulnerable
populations, and integrating sustainable development goals into international
legal frameworks. Furthermore, reinforcing the rule of law, promoting
transparency, and strengthening the accountability of states and international
institutions are essential for fostering a culture of trust and integrity
within the global community.
Global
justice serves as a fundamental principle for promoting equality, protecting
human rights, and fostering a more just and inclusive international order.
International law, as a vital instrument, plays a pivotal role in guiding the
behavior of states, enforcing legal norms, and fostering cooperation among
nations. By prioritizing the enforcement of international legal standards,
promoting collective action, and embracing a holistic approach, the
international community can work towards realizing a more just, equitable, and
sustainable world for present and future generations.
12.
Conclusion
The
intricate web of international law jurisprudence is a dynamic arena that
continuously shapes the principles of global justice. As the world grapples
with unprecedented challenges, the need for a comprehensive understanding of
these legal frameworks has become increasingly imperative. This research paper delves
into the multifaceted landscape of international law jurisprudence, elucidating
the evolving principles of global justice, and concludes by emphasizing the
pivotal role of equitable enforcement and collective cooperation in fostering a
more just and harmonious global community. International law jurisprudence is a
tapestry woven by the collective endeavors of states, international
organizations, and the jurisprudential institutions. It serves as the
cornerstone for regulating state conduct, facilitating peaceful relations, and
addressing transnational issues. The doctrines of sovereignty, state
responsibility, and the enforcement of international agreements form the
bedrock upon which the fabric of international law is built. However, the
evolving nature of global dynamics has led to the emergence of nuanced legal
interpretations that adapt to the changing needs and challenges of the
international community.
The
principles of global justice, while deeply rooted in international law, have
transcended the traditional constraints of state-centric perspectives. The
evolution of global justice principles has witnessed a shift towards a more
holistic and inclusive approach, acknowledging the interconnectedness of human
rights, sustainable development, and environmental protection. The recognition
of the inherent dignity and rights of all individuals, irrespective of
nationality, ethnicity, or socio-economic status, lies at the heart of
contemporary global justice discourse. Moreover, the pursuit of distributive
justice, through initiatives aimed at reducing global inequalities and
promoting socio-economic inclusivity, has gained prominence as a fundamental
tenet of modern international law jurisprudence.
Despite the
progressive developments in international law and global justice, significant
challenges and dilemmas persist. The issue of enforcement remains a critical
impediment, as the efficacy of international law is often hindered by the lack
of a robust enforcement mechanism. The prevalence of power differentials among
states further complicates the equitable application of legal principles,
leading to instances of selective adherence and non-compliance. Moreover, the
growing threat of transnational crimes, terrorism, and the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction poses formidable challenges to the maintenance of
global peace and security. Such complexities underscore the imperative need for
enhanced multilateral cooperation and the reinforcement of international
institutions to address these pressing issues.
Amidst the
complex landscape of international law jurisprudence and the pursuit of global
justice, a collaborative and holistic approach is indispensable. Strengthening
the role of international institutions, such as the International Court of
Justice and the International Criminal Court, is essential for upholding the
rule of law and ensuring accountability for violations of international norms.
Additionally, fostering a culture of compliance through diplomatic dialogues,
mediation, and arbitration mechanisms can facilitate the resolution of disputes
and mitigate conflicts. Emphasizing the significance of inclusive and
participatory decision-making processes, particularly in matters concerning
global environmental sustainability and human rights, is paramount for
achieving a more equitable and just world.
In conclusion,
the intricate tapestry of international law jurisprudence intertwines with the
evolving principles of global justice, reflecting the ever-changing dynamics of
the international landscape. While challenges persist, the collective
commitment to fostering equitable enforcement, promoting multilateral
cooperation, and upholding the rule of law remains paramount. By embracing a
comprehensive and inclusive approach, the global community can strive towards a
more just, peaceful, and sustainable world for generations to come.
[1] Cecil J. B. Hurst. “The Nature of International Law
and the Reason Why It Is Binding on States.” Transactions of the Grotius
Society, vol. 30, 1944, pp. 119–27. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/743203. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
[2] Scott, James Brown. “The Legal Nature of
International Law.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 1, no.
4, 1907, pp. 831–66. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2186495. Accessed 27
Oct. 2023.
[3] W. W. Willoughby. “The Legal Nature of
International Law.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 2, no.
2, 1908, pp. 357–65. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2186596. Accessed 27
Oct. 2023.
[4] Foulke, Roland R. “Definition and Nature of
International Law.” Columbia Law Review, vol. 19, no. 6, 1919, pp.
429–66. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1111587. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
[5] Sherman, Gordon E. “The Nature and Sources of
International Law.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 15,
no. 3, 1921, pp. 349–60. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2187996. Accessed
27 Oct. 2023.
[6] Nardin, Terry. “Theorising the International Rule
of Law.” Review of International Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, 2008, pp.
385–401. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40212481. Accessed 7
Nov. 2023.
[7] Green, L. C. “The Nature of International
Law.” The University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, 1962, pp.
176–93. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/825321. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
[8] “The Classics of International Law.” The
American Journal of International Law, vol. 3, no. 3, 1909, pp.
701–07. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2186697. Accessed 7 Nov.
2023.
[9] Kunz, Josef L. “The Nature of Customary
International Law.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 47,
no. 4, 1953, pp. 662–69. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2194914. Accessed
27 Oct. 2023.
[10] Andrew T. Guzman. “Rethinking International Law as
Law.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International
Law), vol. 103, 2009, pp. 155–57. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/procannmeetasil.103.1.0155. Accessed 27
Oct. 2023.
[11] Elias, Olufemi. “The Nature of the Subjective
Element in Customary International Law.” The International and Comparative
Law Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 3, 1995, pp. 501–20. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/761200. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
[12] Grant, John P. “NATURE AND HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL
LAW.” International Law Essentials, Edinburgh University Press, 2010, pp.
1–10. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1g0b3rw.6. Accessed
27 Oct. 2023.
[13] Mc Whinney, Edward. “Contemporary International Law
and Law-Making.” International Journal, vol. 40, no. 3, 1985, pp.
397–422. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/40202244. Accessed 7 Nov.
2023.
[14] Hall, Stephen. “Researching International
Law.” Research Methods for Law, edited by Mike McConville and Wing Hong
Chui, Edinburgh University Press, 2017, pp. 253–79. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1g0b16n.16. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
[15] JACKSON, JOHN H. “Changing Fundamentals of
International Law and International Economic Law.” Archiv Des
Völkerrechts, vol. 41, no. 4, 2003, pp. 435–48. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40800071. Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
[16] Jennings, R. Y. “The Judiciary, International and
National, and the Development of International Law.” The International
and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 1, 1996, pp. 1–12. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/761066. Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
[17] Wilk, Kurt. “International Law and Global
Ideological Conflict: Reflections on the Universality of International
Law.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 45, no. 4,
1951, pp. 648–70. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2194247. Accessed
7 Nov. 2023.
[18] Ibid
[19] Sohn, Louis B. “Equity in International Law.” Proceedings
of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), vol. 82,
1988, pp. 277–91. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25658429.
Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
[20] Boisen, Camilla. “Subjecting International
Relations to the Law of Nature: A Neglected Aspect of the Early Modern Jurists
and Edmund Burke.” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory,
vol. 60, no. 134, 2013, pp. 69–90. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42705249. Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
[21] Falk, Richard. “THE ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE.” Journal of International Affairs, vol. 37, no. 2,
1984, pp. 253–68. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24356929.
Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
[22] Ratner, Steven R. “International Law: The Trials of
Global Norms.” Foreign Policy, no. 110, 1998, pp. 65–80. JSTOR,
https://doi.org/10.2307/1149277. Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
[23] Kaye, David A. “Global Support for International
Justice.” Justice Beyond The Hague: Supporting the Prosecution of
International Crimes in National Courts, Council on Foreign Relations,
2011, pp. 17–21. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05756.8.
Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
Article Information
AN INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE AND PRINCIPLES OF GLOBAL JUSTICE
Authors: ANNIE WILSON
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/01/04
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.