REVERSING CLIMATE CHANGE THROUGH POLICY INTERVENTIONS (By- Niraj Kumar Seth)
REVERSING
CLIMATE CHANGE THROUGH POLICY INTERVENTIONS
Authored By- Niraj Kumar Seth
“Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal”
- Intergovernmental Penal on Climate
Change(‘IPCC’)
Abstract
The
phenomenon of climate change and its most significant contributors are
explained with credible evidences and statistics in this essay. Policy interventions,
both technological and natural, have been suggested to curtail the impact of
climate change. Policymakers with responsibilities to implement those policies
and steps required to implement them have been identified. The impact of
climate change can be curtailed with appropriate policies, well-funded
research, technological solutions and community participation. A well-designed
policy, implemented in a timely manner and at affordable cost can bring the
required change.
Keywords:
Climate, Change, Policy, Technology, Intervention
Introduction
Climate
change is a global environmental phenomenon that is mainly caused by greenhouse
effect. Some gases, called Green House Gases (‘GHGs) when released in the
Earth’s atmosphere, trap sun’s incoming heat by not allowing it to be reflected
back into space, almost like a greenhouse. The results are global warming,
rising sea levels, shrinking ice sheets, ocean acidification, and extreme
weather events. GHGs include carbon dioxide (‘CO2’),
methane, nitrous oxide, water vapor, etc. The Earth’s average surface
temperature has risen by about 1.18 degrees Celsius since the late 19th
Century.[1] Though natural systems like volcanoes,
permafrost, oceans, etc. also contribute to climate change, research findings
show that human activities are responsible for likely contribution of 55% of
all GHG emissions.[2]
Contributors
To Climate Change
1.
Manufacturing
GHG
emissions from manufacturing industries primarily originate from burning of
fossil fuels in the form of coal, natural gas, oil, etc. Coal is alone
responsible for 44% of the world’s CO2 emissions.[3] Some manufacturing processes also involve
chemical reactions that release GHGs as by-products or wastes. Energy
consumption based on burning of fossil fuel contributes around 73% of worldwide
human induced GHG emissions. Manufacturing and construction contribute about
12% of total GHG emissions.[4] Critics say that industrial development should
be prioritized above all other goals. But such an attitude has proven
disastrous as ecological balance is a precondition to sustainable development.
2.
Transportation
Transportation
may include public as well as private transportation. Around 12% of global GHG
emissions are contributed by transportation alone.[5] Transportation sector is a major consumer of
energy, particularly in the form of petroleum. It contributes to emissions of
harmful GHGs like CO2 and Nitrous oxide. It also causes air
pollution by releasing toxic gases like Sulphur oxides and particulates. Road
transportation is the major contributor within transportation. Today, every
individual either owns or aspires to own a private vehicle. Public
transportation systems like metros, buses, etc. are less polluting and gaining
popularity but only gradually. Air and marine transportation are other modes
within transportation that contribute toes GHG emissions.
3.
Food
Production
World
population is expected to increase to 9.7 billion in 2050.[6] To sustain this huge population, food can
either be grown through the processes of agriculture or animal husbandry.
Global food system is responsible for approximately 21-37% of annual GHG
emissions.[7] Industrialized farming practices are
responsible for soil erosion and soil pollution due to use of chemical
fertilizers and pesticides. This adds nitrous oxide, a powerful GHG to the
atmosphere. Conversion of forests into farmlands and ranches cause
deforestation. Ruminant animals like cow and sheep emit methane as they digest
plants. Feeding huge quantities of grain and water to farmed animals requires
deforested land and resources and is extremely energy-intensive. A contrarian
view is that organically grown food too contribute to environmental degradation
and are unaffordable for masses. Though the argument has substance, with scientific
progress, organically grown food shall become affordable and accessible to the
masses. GHG emissions of organic produce is much lesser than chemically grown
food.
Policy
Interventions
1.
Technological
Policy Interventions
Carbon
capture, sequestration and storage technologies need to be harnessed at global
scale to suck carbon from atmosphere and store it underground or recycle it
sustainably. Electric and hybrid vehicles which run on clean fuel should be
promoted. Switch to renewable sources of energy for human and industrial
consumption by wide scale use of solar, wind and tide energy at affordable cost
is the requirement. Plant based meat alternatives, as championed by the likes
of Impossible Foods, can reduce food based GHG emissions. Ministry of Science
& Technology in consultation with NITI Aayog should formulate policies
conducive for such technological adoptions. Major scientific bodies like CSIR,
universities, and IITs shall foster research and incubate disruptive ideas with
lucrative financial support to researchers. Ministry of Road Transport and
Highway should in partnership with the private sector, particularly the auto
sector, lay down a roadmap to promote manufacturing and adoption of electric
vehicles. Incentivizing consumers to buy electric vehicles with subsidies and
financial support could make a difference. Awareness among general public about
harmful effects of fossil fuel burning and the impact of climate change is of
utmost importance. A policy for roof-top solar energy generation with direct
bank transfers to consumers for surplus electricity generated can popularize
the idea among Indians. Carbon credit system and policies on trading of surplus
carbon credits on exchanges should be designed with participation of industry
leaders. Critics argue that technology is not the panacea for all ills. They
bat for fundamental changes in economic system and lifestyle. Such a utopian
worldview is counterproductive in a world where more than 9% live in extreme
poverty with less than $1.9 a day of income.[8] A scientific approach is
better than a radical knee-jerk response to climate change.
2.
Natural
Policy Interventions
Deforestation
should be immediately curbed. Degraded forests need to be rejuvenated.
Afforestation needs to be promoted on a mission scale. Trees and plants are
sites of natural carbon capture and storage. Education curriculum, right from
primary school level, should incorporate lessons on climate change, its impact
and role of forests and trees in curtailing it. Vegan food as an alternative to
meat needs promotion. Soil erosion and soil pollution need to be checked. Land
use planning and management needs more focus. Industries and Tourism must
respect nature and stay away from protected forests. Population control and
family planning need more attention through education and awareness. Ministry
of Environment, forests and climate change should along with major agricultural
and research institutions, formulate appropriate policies to protect our
forests and increase forest cover. Active involvement of people, especially the
forest dwelling communities and hill tribes is imperative. Industries can fund
afforestation drives by harnessing their Corporate Social Responsibilities
funds. A contrary view relies disproportionately on technological remediation.
While technology can reverse some of the impacts of climate change, we cannot
completely rely on it. At present all such technologies are at a nascent stage
and are mostly uneconomical. We need a holistic policy that taps all possible
resources and solutions to deal with climate change.
Conclusion
An
IPCC 5th Assessment report on global warming projects Earth’s surface
temperature to rise further by as much as 5 degrees Celsius by 2100 in 21st
century, in extreme scenario.[9] We need to wake up and acknowledge the threat
posed by climate change. Right policies, timely implementation through
technological interventions and community participation is the way forward.
References
3.
Quirin
Schiermeier, Eat less meat: UN climate-change
report calls for change to human diet, Nature
(May 31, 2021, 11:23PM), https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02409-7.
4.
Richard
Waite, Tim Searchinger & Janet Ranganathan, 6 Pressing Questions About
Beef and Climate Change, Answered, World Resources Institute (May 31, 2021,
11:45PM),
https://www.wri.org/insights/6-pressing-questions-about-beef-and-climate-change-answered.
5.
How
livestock farming affects the environment, Down to Earth (May 31, 2021, 11:55PM), https://www.downtoearth.org.in/factsheet/how-livestock-farming-affects-the-environment-64218.
6.
Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5
Degree C, IPCC (Jun 1, 2021, 10:30AM),
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf.
7.
Causes
of climate change, European Commission (Jun 1, 2021, 11:10AM),
https://ec.europa.eu/clima/change/causes_en.
8.
Christina
Nunez, What is Global Warming, National Geographic (Jun 1, 2021, 11:30
AM),
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/global-warming-overview.
9.
Fight
Climate Change by Going Vegan,
PETA (Jun 1, 2021, 1:00PM), https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/global-warming/.
10.
Impossible
Foods: Creating Plant-Based Alternatives to Meat | Singapore, Hong Kong, USA,
Macau, UNFCC (Jun1, 2021,
1:23PM),
https://unfccc.int/climate-action/momentum-for-change/planetary-health/impossible-foods.
11.
Kelly Levin, 8 Things You Need To Know
About the IPCC 1.5 Degrees Celsius Report, World Resources Institute (Jun
1, 2021, 1:12PM),
https://www.wri.org/insights/8-things-you-need-know-about-ipcc-15c-report.
Nathaniel Scharping, How Hot Will Climate Change
Make The Earth By The Year 2100?, Discover (Jun 1, 2021, 1:55PM), https://www.discovermagazine.com/environment/how-hot-will-climate-change-make-the-earth-by-the-year-2100