INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] “Artificial intelligence.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, (17 Dec. 2022, 11.47 A.M)

[2] US government use of AI is shoddy and failing citizens - The Register. ( 17 Dec. 2022, 1.03 P.M) https://www.theregister.com/2018/09/26/us_government_algorithms/

[3] MARYANNE NGUYEN, The Importance of Time Management in Legal Practise, (17 Dec. 2022, 1.12 P.M) https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/the-importance-of-time-management-in-legal-practise/

[4] ELONNAI HICKOK, SHWETA MOHANDAS & SWARAJ PAUL BAROOAH, The AI Task Force Report - The first steps towards India’s AI framework, THE CENTRE FOR INTERNET SOCIETY (9 Dec. 2022, 7.06 A.M), https://cisindia.org/internet-governance/files/ai-task-force-report.pdf.

[5] K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India and Ors, 2017 S.C.C. OnLine S.C. 996 (India).

[6] Universal Declaration of Human Rights, (20 Dec. 2022, 2.57 P.M) https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

[7] International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights

[8]Pegasus spyware and its impacts on human rights, Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/-/pegasus-spyware-and-its-impacts-on-human-rights (20 Dec. 2022, 4.17 P.M)

[10] Sakshi Goyal, Emerging Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trends in The Legal Profession, iPLEADERS (20 Dec. 2022, 5.34 P.M), https://blog.ipleaders.in/ai-in-legal-profession/.

[11] Zoya Hussain, Can Artificial Intelligence Boost the Pace of India's Judicial System? ( 23 Dec. 2022, 8.50 A.M),

https://www.indiatimes.com/explainers/news/artificial-intelligence-and-indias-judicial-system-565113.html

[12] PRITAM BORDOLOI, The Power & Pitfalls of AI in Indian Justice system (22 Dec. 2022, 8.53 AM), https://analyticsindiamag.com/the-power-pitfalls-of-ai-in-indian-justice-system/

[13]Godfrey & David, “Legal Services Are Under Stress, but Enduring.” Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, vol. 43, no. 4, 2019, pp. 67–72.

[14] ATANU BISWAS , A robot in a judge's chair - The Statesman. (22 Dec. 2022, 10.11 A.M),

https://www.thestatesman.com/opinion/robot-judges-chair-1503031697.html

[15] Richa Bhatia, Story of CaseMine, NCR based startup that’s disrupting Indian legal system using AI,

ANALYTICS INDIA (22 Dec. 2022, 12.18 P.M), https://www.analyticsindiamag.com/story-casemine-ncr-based-startup-thatsdisrupting-indian-legal-system-using-ai/.

[1] Ashish Kothari and Anuprita Patel, ‘Environment and Human Rights’, NHRC.

[2] Ashish Kothari and Anuprita Patel, supra note 1.

[3] ‘The Environmental Food Crisis: A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment’, http://www.grida.no/publications/rr/food -crisis/

[4] ‘Human Rights and the Environment’, http://www.unep.org/delc/HumanRightsandTheEnvironment/tabid/54409/D efault.aspx

[6] Timothy Egan, ‘Sustainability: Carrying Capacity & Ecological Footprints’, New York Times US California: Slumburbia (2010) http://www.overpopulation.org/consumption.html.

[7] Gurdip Singh, Environmental Law in India 100 (MacMillan Indian Ltd., New Delhi 2005).

[8] Y. K. Sabharwal, ‘Human Rights and the Environment’.

[10] A. Boyle and M. Anderson, Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection (Oxford 1996).

[11] Margaret DeMerieux, ‘Deriving Environmental Rights from the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, (2001) 21(3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 521.

[12] Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P., A.I.R. 1985 S.C. 652.

[13] Francis Coralie Mullin v. Union Territory of Delhi, A.I.R. 1981 S.C. 746.

[15] Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India, A.I.R. 1990 S.C. 1480.

[16] Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, A.I.R. 1991 S.C. 420.

[17] V. Mathur v. Union of India, (1996) 1 S.C.C. 119.

[18] M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1996) 4 S.C.C. 351.

[19] Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P., supra note 11.

[20] Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (Coastal Protection Case), (1996) 5 S.C.C. 281.

[21] M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1996) 4 S.C.C. 750.

[22] M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (Ganga Water Pollution Case), A.I.R. 1988 S.C. 1037.

[23] Weeramantry, J. (Separate Opinion) 91-92, http://www.icj-cji.org/docket/files/92/7383.pdf.

[24] U.N. Doc. A/CONF.151/26/Rev.1 (93.I.8) (1993).

[2] Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961

[3] Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961

[4] Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961

[5] The Tribune, “Indian staffer in Pak kidnapped, released”, April 19.

[6] Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961

[7] Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961

[8] Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961

[9] Dr H.O Agarwal, International Law and Human Rights.

[1] Indus Biotech v. Kotak India Ventures Ltd., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 268 (hereinafter ‘Indus Biotech’).

[2] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 11, No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1996 (India).

[3] Ajar Rab, Defining the Contours of The Public Policy Exception – A New Test for Arbitrability in India, 7 IND. JOUR. OF ARB. L. 161, 161 (2019).

[4] N. BLACKABY ET AL., REDFERN AND HUNTER ON INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ¶ 2.126 (6th ed. 2015).

[5] Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd., (2011) 5 SCC 532.

[6] Vidya Drolia v Durga Trading Corporation, (2021) 2 SCC 1.

[8] Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 3(12), No. 31, Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).

[9] Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 3(11), No. 31, Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).

[10] Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 3(6), No. 31, Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).

[11] Innoventive Industries Limited v. ICICI Bank, (2018) 1 SCC 407 30.

[12] Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 9(3)(b), No. 31, Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).

[13] Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Lmt. v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 73

[14] AnAn (Singapore) Pte Ltd v. VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) [2020] SGCA 33.

[15] Salford Estates (No 2) Ltd v. Altomart Ltd (No 2) [2015] Ch 589.

[16] Ivo Welch, Arturo Welch & Ning Zhu, The Costs of Bankruptcy: Chapter 7 Liquidation Versus Chapter 11 Reorganization, 61 JOURN. OF FIN. 1253, 1275 (2006).

[17] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 29B, No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1996 (India).

[18] National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016, GSR 716(E) 57.

[1] ^{1 Maslow , Abraham . ( 1954 ) , Motivation and Personality . New York : Harper and Brothers , 89191 .}

[2]^{Trussell , Robert . ' The Children's Streets : An Ethnographic Study of Street Children in Ciudad Juarez , Mexico International Social Work . 42 , 2. ( 190 )}

^{3 Human Rights Watch , 1- Human Rights Watch Report : ' Promises Broken . ' Human Rights Watch . http://www.hrw.org/ children / street.htm}

^{4 Lugalla and Mbwambo , 335-337- Lugalla . Joe and Mbwambo . Jessie Kazeni . ' Street Children and Street Life in Urban Tanzania : The Culture of Surviving and its Implications for Children's Health . ' 1999. Blackwell Publishers .}

^{5 Better Care Network, available at: UN CRC General Comment No. 21 (2017) on children in street situations | Better Care Network}

[1] The Constitution of India, art. 21.

[2] General Christian View, “Religious Perspective on Euthanasia”, Institute of Clinical Bioethics, March 14, 2011. Available at <https://sites.sju.edu/icb/religious-perspectives-on-euthanasia/ > (last visited on May 10, 2021).

[3] Kiarash Aramesh and Heydar Shadi, “Euthanasia, An Islamic Ethical Perspective”, 6 Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 35-38, (2007).

[4] Religions, “Euthanasia, assisted dying, and suicide”, BBC, Aug 25, 2009. Available at <https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/hinduism/hinduethics/euthanasia.shtml > (Last visited on May 10, 2021)

[5] Toyomasa Fuse, “Suicide and culture in Japan: A study of Seppuku as an institutionalized form of suicide”, 15 Soc Psychiatry 57-63 (1980).

[6] AIR 1997 SC 411

[7] Attempt to commit suicide.

[8] (1877) 94 US 133

[9] 1963 AIR 1295.

[10] 1988 Cr. LJ 549

[11] 1994 AIR 1844.

[12] Ibid., para 88

[13] ibid

[14] (1962) 2 SCC 648

[15] Euthanasia, Defined by Britannica. Available at < https://www.britannica.com/topic/euthanasia > (Last visited on May 12, 2021).

[16] Brassington, I, “What passive euthanasia is”, 21 BMC Med Ethics 41 (2020). Available at <https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-020-00481-7 >

[17] Voluntary Euthanasia, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Available at <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/euthanasia-voluntary/ >

[18] Sarah Mroz, Sigrid Dierickx, luc Deliens, et.al., “Assisted dying around the world: a status questionis”, 10 Annals of Palliative Medicine (2021).

[19] AIR 2011 SC 1290.

[20] The doctrine implies that the king is the father of the State and is under the obligation to look after the interest of those who are unable to look after themselves, it means if a citizen is in need of someone who can act as parents and make decisions, sometimes it is the State who is best suited for that role.

[21] AIR 2018 SC 1665.

[22] Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab, (1996) 2 SCC 648

[23] Faizan Mustafa, “Is the right to Die an Issue for the Poor?”, The Wire, March 23, 2018. Available at <https://thewire.in/law/is-the-right-to-die-an-issue-for-the-poor > (Last visited on May 15, 2021).

[1] Ram Gulam And Anr. vs Government Of U.P. on 22 August, 1949 AIR 1950 All 206

[2] Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 29 September, 1964 ; 1965 AIR 1039, 1965 SCR (1) 375

[3] The Lasalgaon Merchants vs Prabhudas Hathibhai And Ors. on 16 March, 1965 AIR 1966 Bom 134, (1965) 67 BOMLR 823, ILR 1966 Bom 526

[4] State Of Bombay (Now Gujarat) vs Memon Mahomed Haji Hasam on 5 May, 1967, 1967 AIR 1885, 1967 SCR (3) 938

[5] Basavva Kom Dyamangouda Patil v. State of Mysore ((1977) 4 SCC 358)

[1] 3 Issue 4 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 2431 (2020) Marriages under Different Laws

[2] 5 Allahabad L.J. 103 (1908) The Mitakshara Theory of Sapindaship in Hindu Law

[3] Provided that none of the above shall invalidate disposition or alienation in her property which had taken place before the 20^th day of December, 2004

[4] Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma,(2020) 9 SCC 1

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

The Consortium Of Artificial Intelligence In Legal System By - R.A.Aswin Krishna

Nature, Hazards And Rights: Exploring National And International Perspectives Of Environment Exploitation By - Dr. Hardik Daga

The Privileges And Immunities Of A Diplomatic Agent Under The Vienna Convention Are Not Absolute By - Eesha Parande

FAILURE ATTEMPT OF ARBITRATION IN INDUS BIOTECH v KOTAK INDIA by - Neil J Shah

LAW, AND SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION IN INDIA By: Awale Jayashree Lalasaheb

ANALYSIS OF LOK ADALAT IN INDIA By - Priyanka Sahebrao Gade

CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF RIGHT TO DIE IN INDIA: A LEGAL STUDY By: Srishti Sori

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STATE FOR CONFISCATED PROPERTY UNDER BAILMENT By - Siddharth Bansal & Yuvraj D Mitra

Analytic Examination On Right To Fair Trial Under Indian laws By – Tanveer Sethi & Sarthak Pant

UNDERSTANDING THE SCOPE OF A HINDU DAUGHTER’S RIGHT IN COPARCENARY PROPERTY THROUGH THE LENSE OF VINEETA SHARMA V. RAKESH SHARMA. By - Mihika Suryavanshi

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2