INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE IMPACT OF ANTI-DEFECTION LAWS ON THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE OF INDIA BY - VIPIN KUMAR & DR. ACHARYA RISHI RANJAN

Authors: VIPIN KUMAR & DR. ACHARYA RISHI RANJAN

Registration ID: 108478 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8478 & IJLRA8479

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: bipinten@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-93566791/THE IMPACT OF ANTI-DEFECTION LAWS ON THE POLITICAL

NAVIGATING LEGISLATIVE OVERRIDES: NON OBSTANTE CLAUSES AND THE INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE BY: HRIDAY GANDHI

Authors: HRIDAY GANDHI

Registration ID: 108476 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8476

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: hridaygandhi2@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-38669461/NAVIGATING LEGISLATIVE OVERRIDES: NON OBSTANTE CLA

ANALYSIS OF RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN COMMERCIAL BANKS BY - ADV. LIDIA MERIN P JOSE, NAFIA FARZANA T A & RESHMA RAMESH

Authors: ADV. LIDIA MERIN P JOSE, NAFIA FARZANA T A & RESHMA RAMESH

Registration ID: 108473 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8473, IJLRA8474 & IJLRA8475

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: chinnuprasanna1996@gmail.com, thecookbook304@gmail.com & malayalipwoliyada0@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-96658121/ANALYSIS OF RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN COMMERCI

THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE AGE OF STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM BY - GAUTHAM A B, TIMNA BRIJIT TENNISON, RESHMA R & PRIYAMOL C P

Authors: GAUTHAM A B, TIMNA BRIJIT TENNISON, RESHMA R & PRIYAMOL C P

Registration ID: 108469 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8469, IJLRA8470, IJLRA8471 & IJLRA8472

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: chinnuprasanna1996@gmail.com, thecookbook304@gmail.com, malayalipwoliyada0@gmail.com & seenaps866@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-86684186/THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE AGE OF S

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOCTRINE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS IN INDIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM BY - MAUSAM KUMAR

Authors: MAUSAM KUMAR

Registration ID: 108468 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8468

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: mausamk21@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-84288466/COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOCTRINE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN

REFUGEE RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: CHALLENGES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD BY - AAYAT MOHD RAISH KHAN & KULDEEP B MALUSARE

Authors: AAYAT MOHD RAISH KHAN & KULDEEP B MALUSARE

Registration ID: 108467 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8467 & IJLRA8477

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aayatkhan05022@gmail.com & kuldeep0315@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-44715632/REFUGEE RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW:

"SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: THE TUG OF WAR IN INDIAN JURISPRUDENCE" BY - ARPITA JAIN

Authors: ARPITA JAIN

Registration ID: 108466 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8466

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: jainarpita260@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-38728279/SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: TH

DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICABILITY AND CHALLENGES UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 BY - HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

Authors: HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

Registration ID: 108464 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8464 & IJLRA8465

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: hitenlakhani.work@gmail.com & adityasharmaclc@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-88139599/DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICAB

ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FOURTH BRANCH INSTITUTIONS BY - KUMAIL FATIMA

Authors: KUMAIL FATIMA

Registration ID: 108463 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8463

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: fatima19kumail@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-22256679/ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION

HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA BY - ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

Authors: ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

Registration ID: 108461 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8461 & IJLRA8462

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: advsimranveer@gmail.com & manjusinghveer66@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-58292387/HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/defection

^{^[1]} Union of India v. G.M. Kokil, AIR 1984 SC 1022.

^{^[2]} South India Corporation (P) Ltd. v. Secy., Board of Revenue, Trivandrum, AIR 1964 SC 207.

^{^[3]} G.P. Singh, Principles of Statutory Interpretation, p. no. 368-9 (LexisNexis, India, 13th Edition)

^{^[4]} supra Note 2: South India Corporation (P) Ltd. v. Secy., Board of Revenue, Trivandrum, AIR 1964 SC 207.

^{^[6]} P. Virudhuchalam v. Management of Lotus Mills, AIR 1998 SC 554

^{^[7]} Sharda Devi v. State of Bihar, AIR 2002 SC 1357

^{^[8]} State of Bihar v. Bihar Rajya M.S.E.S.K.K. Mahasangh, (2005) 9 SCC 129

^{^[9]} R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka, (1992) 1 SCC 335

^{^[10]} JIK Industries v. Amarlal V. Jumani, (2012) 3 SCC 255

^{^[11]} Aswini Kumar Ghosh v. Arabinda Bose, AIR 1952 SC 369

^{^[12]} Dominion of India v. Shrinbai A. Irani, AIR 1954 SC 596

^{^[13]} JIK Industries v. Amarlal V. Jumani, (2012) 3 SCC 255

^{^[14]} A.G. Varadarajulu v. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 1998 SC 1388

^{^[15]} G.P. Singh, Principles of Statutory Interpretation, p. no. 368-9 (LexisNexis, India, 13th Edition). See also Iridium India Telecom Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola Inc., (2005) 2 SCC 145

^{^[16]} KSL & Industries Ltd. v. Arihant Threads Ltd., (2008) 9 SCC 763

^{^[17]} Bank of India v. Ketan Parekh, (2008) 8 SCC 148

^{^[18]} Discussion on the motion for consideration of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (As Reported by Joint Committee). Available at: https://loksabha.nic.in/Members/result16.aspx?dbsl=6901

^{^[19]} Innovative Industries v. ICCI Bank Ltd., (2018) 1 SCC 407

^{^[21]} Duncans Industries Ltd. v. AJ Agrochem, (2019) 9 SCC 725.

^{^[22]} Section 238, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016)

^{^[23]} Section 3(8) of IBC, 2016 - “corporate debtor” means a corporate person who owes a debt to any person.

^{^[24]} P. Mohanraj v. Shah Bros. Ispat (P) Ltd., (2021) 6 SCC 258

^{^[25]} Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, indicates that proceedings under the Companies Act relating to arbitration, compromise, arrangements and reconstruction and winding up of companies, that were pending before the District Court or the High Court, may now be transferred to the Tribunal.

^{^[26]} Employees Organization v. Jaipur Metals & Electricals Ltd., (2019) 4 SCC 227

^{^[27]} CIT v. Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd., (2018) 18 SCC 786

^{^[28]} supra Note 25 - P. Mohanraj v. Shah Bros. Ispat (P) Ltd., (2021) 6 SCC 258

^{^[29]} SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd. v. Sterling SEZ and Infrastructure Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine NCLT 6878

^{^[30]} Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Abhilash Lal, (2020) 13 SCC 234

^{^[31]} B. K. Educational Services Pvt Ltd v. Parag Gupta And Associates, (2019) 11 SCC 633

^{^[32]} Embassy Property Development Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka, C.A. No. 9170 of 2019

[1] Abiola, I., & Olausi, A. S. (2014). The impact of credit risk management on the commercial banks performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(5), 295-306.

[2] Wijewardana, W. P., & Wimalasiri, P. D. (2017). Impact of risk management on the performance of commercial banks. in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Advanced Research., 5(11), 1441- 1449.https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5919

[1]Klemash, S., Smith, J. C., & Doyle, R. (2019, June 13). Stakeholder capitalism for long-term value creation (Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance). Retrieved from https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/06/13/stakeholder-capitalism-for-long-term-value-creation/

[2]Alexander, F., Ensign-Barstow, H., & Palladino, L. (2020, October 26). From shareholder primacy to stakeholder capitalism (Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance). Retrieved from https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/10/26/from-shareholder-primacy-to-stakeholder-capitalism/

[3] KKS Advisors, & TCP. (2020, October 24). COVID-19 and inequality: A test of corporate purpose. KKS Advisors. Retrieved from https://www.kksadvisors.com/tcp-test-of-corporate-purpose-september2020

[1] A.S.Akoto., ‘Public policy: An amorphous concept in the enforcement of arbitral awards’ (2020) (7) (1) Journal of Liberty and International Affairs p.56 available at https://heinonline-org.eresources.nls.ac.in/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jlia7&i=51. accessed 16 September 2023.

[2] Y. Dubey, ‘Analysis of Public Policy and Enforcement of Domestic and Foreign Arbitral Awards in India’ (2018) (7) (2) Christ University Law Journal available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/chulj7&i=195 accessed 17 September 2023.

[3] Anirudh Hariani, ‘Indian arbitration and the shifting sands of public policy’ (2020) (16) (2) Asian International Arbitration Journal p.171 available at https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Asian+International+Arbitration+Journal/16.2/AIAJ2020020. accessed 16 September 2023.

[4] Tariq Khan, 'Whether to Invest or not: Comparative Analysis of the Public Policy Doctrine in India and England' (2021) 8 (1) RGNUL Financial & Mercantile Law Review pp. 39 available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/rlfladme8&i=47 accessed 15 September 2023.

[5]Tariq Khan, 'Whether to Invest or not: Comparative Analysis of the Public Policy Doctrine in India and England' (2021) 8 (1) RGNUL Financial & Mercantile Law Review pp. 39 available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/rlfladme8&i=47 accessed 15 September 2023.

[6] A J van den Berg, ‘The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation’, (1981) p. 360.

[7] Harpreet Kaur, ‘The 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act: A Step Toward Improving Arbitration in India’, (2010) (6) (1) Hastings Business Law Journal pp. 262-263 available at https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1146&context=hastings_business_law_journal accessed on 17 September 2023

[8] Travaux pre?paratoires, ‘Report of the Committee on the Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards’, (2016) pp. 20-21 & 23 available at https://newyorkconvention1958.org/pdf/guide/2016_Guide_on_the_NY_Convention.pdf#page=251 accessed 17 September 2023.

[9] J. Gillis Wetter, ‘Present Status of the International Court of Arbitration of the ICC: An Appraisal’, (1990) (1) (1) The American Review of International Arbitration pp. 91-93.

[10] Tariq Khan, 'Whether to Invest or not: Comparative Analysis of the Public Policy Doctrine in India and England' (2021) 8 RGNUL Fin & Mercantile L Rev 35 (SCC ONLINE)

[12] Soinco SACI & Anr. v. Novokuznetsk Aluminium Plant & Ors., [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 337, Court of Appeal, England and Wales [1998] CLC 730.

[13] Sonatrach (Algeria) v. Distrigas Corp, (United States District Court) Massachusetts (1995) XX Y.B. Comm Arb at 795.

[14] The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 92 S. Ct. 1907 (1972).

[15] Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 US 506 (1974).

[16] Mitsubishi v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, 473 U.S. 614 (1985).

[17] Dutch Seller v. German Buyer, (1987) XII Y.B. Comm. Arb.at 489.

[18] SA Laboratories Eurosilicone v. Societe Bez Medizintechnik GmbH (2004) Revue deI’Arbitrage 133.

[19] Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co., 1994 Supp (1) SCC 644.

[20] Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd., (2003) 5 SCC 705.

[21] Phulchand Exports Ltd. v. OOO Patriot, (2011) 10 SCC 300.

[22] Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa, (2014) 2 SCC 433.

[23] Law Commission of India, Report No. 246 on Amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Aug. 2014)

[24] Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority, 2014 SCC OnLine SC 937.

[25] Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 677.

[26] Vijay Karia & Ors. v. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL & Ors., 2020 SCC Online SC 177.

[27] National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India v. Alimenta S.A., 2020 SCC OnLine SC 381.

[29] Westacre Investment Inc. v. Jugoimport SDPR Holding Company Ltd and ors. [2000] QB 288

[32] RBRG Trading (UK) Limited v. Sinocore International Co. Ltd. [2018] EWCA Civ 838.

[1] Chetan Kumar**. (2018). “The Role of the Supreme Court in the Protection of Refugee Rights in India: A Critical Assessment.” *Indian Journal of Constitutional Law*, 10(1), 25-56.

[2] National Human Rights Commission v. State of Arunachal Pradesh**. (1996). AIR 1996 SC 1234.

[3] Lauterpacht, E., C Bethlehem, D.** (2003). “The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non- Refoulement: Opinion.” *International Journal of Refugee Law*, 15(2), 235-249.

[4] United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)**. (2011). “Handbook and Guidelines on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status.” UNHCR.

[5] Feller, E.** (2008). “Refugees and the Rule of Law.” *International Journal of Refugee Law*, 20(2), 171- 195.

[6] Zetter, R.** (2018). “More than Protection: A Development Perspective on Refugee Rights.” *International Journal of Refugee Law*, 30(1), 1-20.

[7] Hussain v. Union of India**. (2015). W.P.(C) No. 167/2015.

Mohammed Salimullah v. Union of India**. (2017). W.P.(C) No. 1099/2017.

[8] Amnesty International India v. Union of India**. (2020). W.P.(C) No. 1311/2020.

[9] Buchanan, A., C Keohane, R. O. (Eds.) (2006). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations.

[10] Bhabha, J.** (2014). “The Challenge of Refugee Protection in a Globalized World.” *Harvard International Law Journal*, 55(2), 451-487.

^{^[2]} Smt. Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani & ... vs Union Of India & Ors 995 AIR 1531

^{^[3]} Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum And Ors 1985 AIR 945

^{^[4]} Danial Latifi & Anr vs Union Of India AIR 2001 SC 3958

^{^[6]} Mary Roy V. The State Of Kerala 1986 AIR 1011, 1986 Scr (1) 371

^{^[8]} Smt. Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani & ... vs Union Of India & Ors 995 AIR 1531

[1] Subodh Asthana, All You Want to Know about Digital & Electronic Signature - iPleaders, Key Highlights (June 21, 2019), https://blog.ipleaders.in/digital-electronic-signature/.

[2] Archana Balasubramanian, Digital Signature And Electronic Signature - Legal Framework, IT and Internet (June 24, 2021), https://www.mondaq.com/india/it-and-internet/1083500/digital-signature-and-electronic-signature-legal- framework.

[4] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 2(1)(ta)

[5] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 2(1)(p)

[7] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 3

[8] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 5

[9] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 35

[12] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 24(1)

[17] Subodh Asthana, All You Want to Know about Digital & Electronic Signature - iPleaders, Key highlights (June 21, 2019), https://blog.ipleaders.in/digital-electronic-signature/.

[18] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 35

[19] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 23

[22] Trimex International Fze Ltd. v. Vedanta Aluminum Ltd. (2010)

[23] State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003)

^{^[1]}Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws (Edited by Anne M. Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller, and Harold Samuel Stone) (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

^{^[2]}Christoph Möllers, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (OUP 2015) 16-49, 110-126.

^{^[3]} John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (Edited by Peter Laslett) (Broadview Press, 2003).

^{^[4]} Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract (Edited by Maurice Cranston) (Penguin Classics, 1987).

^{^[5]} Ram Jawaya v State of Punjab [1955] 2 SCR 225, AIR 1955 SC 549.

^{^[6]} Keshavananda Bharti v Union of India [1973] 4 SCC 225, AIR 1973 SC 1461.

^{^[7]} Indira Gandhi Nehru v. Raj Narain [1975] 2 SCC 159 AIR 1975.

^{^[8]} N Kannadasan v Ajoy Khose & Ors [2009] AIR 2009 SC 178

^{^[9]} Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association & Anr v Union of India (2016) 5 SCC 1, (2016) 2 SCC (LS) 253.

^{^[10]} Peter Gerangelos, The Separation of Powers and Legislative Interference in Judicial Process: Constitutional Principles and Limitations (Hart Publishing, 2006).

^{^[11]} Tarunabh Khaitan, 'Guarantor Institutions' (2021) Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

^{^[12]} Mark Tushnet, ‘Institutions Supporting Constitutional Democracy: Some Conceptual Issues’ (2016) 49(3) Constitutional Commentary 689

^{^[13]} Cheryl Saunders, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch (1993) 72 Colum. L. Rev. 573.

^{^[14]} Cheryl Saunders, The Paradox of Independence: Separation of Powers and the Judiciary’s Review of Agency Action (1985) 34 Buff. L. Rev. 683.

^{^[15]} Gisela Sin, Separation of Powers and Legislative Organization: The President, the Senate, and Political Parties in the Making of House Rules (Cambridge University Press, 1998).

^{^[16]} Hayek, F A, The Constitution of Liberty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960) ch 12.

[1] Vishaka and Ors v State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011.

[3] The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 (39 of 2005).

[4] The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (25 of 1986).

[6] The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (26 of 1937).

[7] The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).

[8] The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005).

[9] Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (14 of 2013).

[10] Aditya Mukherjee, ‘Empire: How Colonial India Made Modern Britain’ (2010) 45(50) Economic and Political Weekly 11-17 accessed 7 April 2024.

[11] The Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 (3 of 1936).

[12] The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 (15 of 1872).

[15] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 5.

[16] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 7.

[17] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 12.

[18] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 24.

[19] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 25.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE IMPACT OF ANTI-DEFECTION LAWS ON THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE OF INDIA BY - VIPIN KUMAR & DR. ACHARYA RISHI RANJAN

NAVIGATING LEGISLATIVE OVERRIDES: NON OBSTANTE CLAUSES AND THE INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE BY: HRIDAY GANDHI

ANALYSIS OF RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN COMMERCIAL BANKS BY - ADV. LIDIA MERIN P JOSE, NAFIA FARZANA T A & RESHMA RAMESH

THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE AGE OF STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM BY - GAUTHAM A B, TIMNA BRIJIT TENNISON, RESHMA R & PRIYAMOL C P

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOCTRINE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS IN INDIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM BY - MAUSAM KUMAR

REFUGEE RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: CHALLENGES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD BY - AAYAT MOHD RAISH KHAN & KULDEEP B MALUSARE

"SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: THE TUG OF WAR IN INDIAN JURISPRUDENCE" BY - ARPITA JAIN

DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICABILITY AND CHALLENGES UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 BY - HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FOURTH BRANCH INSTITUTIONS BY - KUMAIL FATIMA

HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA BY - ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2