INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE CASE OF ‘BOROLINE’ VS ‘BOROBEAUTY’: A LEGAL EXAMINATION OF TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT BY - PRANJAL SRIVASTAV & SHREYA SRIVASTAVA

Authors: PRANJAL SRIVASTAV & SHREYA SRIVASTAVA

Registration ID: 108312 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8312 & IJLRA8313

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: PRANJALSRIVASTAV25@GMAIL.COM & PRANJALSRIVASTAVXYZ@GMAIL.COM

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-88196244/THE CASE OF ‘BOROLINE’ VS ‘BOROBEAUTY’: A

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LABOUR LAWS IN INDIA BY: MOHAMMED MUTHAR MYDEEN.D

Authors: MOHAMMED MUTHAR MYDEEN.D

Registration ID: 108311 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8311

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: Mutharmydeen26@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-15739932/AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LA

A STUDY ON LEGAL CHALLENGES FACED IN CYBER INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION, ACCESS TO JUSTICE BY - SHREYANK KUMAR.B

Authors: SHREYANK KUMAR.B

Registration ID: 108310 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8310

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: SHREYANK KUMAR.B

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-29588852/A STUDY ON LEGAL CHALLENGES FACED IN CYBER INVESTI

A STUDY ON THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ON THE PLANT VARIETIES PROTECTION IN INDIA BY - DR PAULINE PRIYA

Authors: DR PAULINE PRIYA

Registration ID: 108309 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8309

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: paulipriya@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-24542781/A STUDY ON THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ON THE PLANT

THE RISE OF WOMEN IN POLICING: SHATTERING GLASS CEILING AND STEREOTYPES BY - HEMA SUDANTHIRA GNANASEKARAN & VIGNESHWARI GNANASEKARAN

Authors: HEMA SUDANTHIRA GNANASEKARAN & VIGNESHWARI GNANASEKARAN

Registration ID: 108307 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8307 & IJLRA8308

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: hemavicky1528@gmail.com & g.vigneshwari2006@gmail.com

Page No : 27 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-61363646/THE RISE OF WOMEN IN POLICING: SHATTERING GLASS CE

ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY BY - DHOBALE SANKET NARAYAN

Authors: DHOBALE SANKET NARAYAN

Registration ID: 108306 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8306

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sanket.dhobale123@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-72354158/ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

UNDERSTANDING OF DIGITAL ARREST: DEFINITION, METHODS AND IMPLICATIONS BY - ASMITA MALLICK & PRITHWISH GANGULI

Authors: ASMITA MALLICK & PRITHWISH GANGULI

Registration ID: 108304 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8304 & IJLRA8305

Year : Aug -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: asmita.mallick.04@gmail.com & prithwishganguli@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-39146355/UNDERSTANDING OF DIGITAL ARREST: DEFINITION, METHO

SOCIAL BOYCOTT OF TRANSGENDER AND INDIAN CONSTITUTION - AN ANALYSIS BY – DR. M. A. THAMIZH SELVI

Authors: DR. M. A. THAMIZH SELVI

Registration ID: 108303 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8303

Year : Aug -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: prof.thamizh@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-92332466/SOCIAL BOYCOTT OF TRANSGENDER AND INDIAN CONSTITUT

UNVEILING INDIA’S OTT ODYSSEY: DECODING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR PLATFORMS AND APPS BY - JASJIT SINGH

Authors: JASJIT SINGH

Registration ID: 108302 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8302

Year : Aug -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: jasjitsinghsindhu@gmail.com

Page No : 41 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-69953433/UNVEILING INDIA’S OTT ODYSSEY: DECODING THE LEGA

CONTEMPORARY OVERVIEW ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC HISTORY DEVELOPMENT AND STATUS QUO OF PROSTITUTION IN INDIA BY - NOHITHA ANIL & LAKSHMI PRIYA P

Authors: NOHITHA ANIL & LAKSHMI PRIYA P

Registration ID: 108300 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8300 & IJLRA8301

Year : Aug -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: nohithaanil@gmail.com & plakshmipriya36@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/08.2024-79143377/CONTEMPORARY OVERVIEW ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC HISTORY DE

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[2]Lence, Sergio & Hayes, Dermot & Alston, Julian & Smith, J.. “Intellectual property in plant breeding: Comparing different levels and forms of protection”, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2015.

[3] Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 1883

[5][5] International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, 1961

[8] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations , 2001

[9] The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 2004

[10] The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2014

[11] The Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1999 (1869 UNTS 299)

[12] Articles 22-24 of The Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1999 (1869 UNTS 299)

[13] Articles 70.8 and 70.9 of The Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1999 (1869 UNTS 299)

[14] Article 27.3 (b) of The Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1999 (1869 UNTS 299)

[17] The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, Act No. 48 of 1999

[18] The Biological Diversity Act, Act No. 18 of 2003

[23] The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 53 of 2001

[25] Section 29(2),The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[28] Section 13, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[30] Section 27, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[31] Section 38, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[32] Section 30 , The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[33] Section 39, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[34] Section 41, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[35] Section 26, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[36] Section 47, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[37] Section 26, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[38] Section 45 , The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[39] Section 41, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[40] Section 46 , The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[41] Section 41,45, The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001

[1] A. Damodaran: Implications of Competition Policy on Biotechnology Industry in India', in P.S. Mehta ed., Towards a Functional Competition Policy for India 239, 246 (New Delhi Academic Foundation, 2005).

[3] 9. Food and Agricultural Organization, Regulating GMOs in Developing and Transition Countries, Background Document to Conference 9, Electronic Forum on Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture (2003), available at http://www.fao.org/biotech/C9doc.htm.

[4] Opponents of bio-technology are skeptical about the role of bio-technology in increasing the food security; they point to the threats that it poses to sustainable development to agricultural and environmental bio-diversity and to public health, they counsel caution about the not yet well known risks of gene technology. Floma Macmillan, WTO and Environment, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 2007 quoted from 36 Nalsar Law Review

[vol. 3: no. 1].

[5] A definition of 'Technology' proposed by Donald Schon reads as: 'Any tool or technique, any product or process, any physical equipment or method of doing or making, by which human capability is extended'.

[6] Gregory N. Mandel, 'History Lessons for a General Theory of Law and Technology', 8 Minnesota Journals of Law, Science and Technology, 551-570 (2007).

[7] https://www.lonestar.edu/history-of-biotechnology.htm

[8] Dr. Lily Srivastava, Law Relating to Science & Technology (First Edition).

[9] Dr. Lily Srivastava, Law Relating to Science & Technology (First Edition).

[10] Dr. Lily Srivastava, Law Relating to Science & Technology (First Edition).

[11] Dr. Lily Srivastava, Law Relating to Science & Technology (First Edition).

[1] Juan José Ganuza & María Fernanda Viecens, Over-the-top (OTT) content: Implications and best response strategies of traditional telecom operators. evidence from Latin America, 16 info 59–69 (2014).

[2] Emergence and future of over-the-top (OTT) video services in India: An ..., News18, (2019).

[3] The Information Technology (intermediary guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) rules, 2021, PRS Legislative Research (2023).

[4] Thankachan Jose Kaitharath & Shruti Nirmal, Contemporary relevance of OTT platforms in the entertainment world with special reference to Indian cinema industry, 9 Journal of Management Research and Analysis 187– 190 (2022).

[5] Debarun Chakraborty et al., Watching is valuable: Consumer views – content consumption on OTT platforms, 70 Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 103148 (2023).

[6] Faheema Shirin R.K. vs State of Kerala and Others (2019) SCC (WP (C) No. 19716 of 2019 (L).

[7] Justice for Rights Foundation v. Union of India, (2018) SCC.

[8] Article 19(1) in The Constitution Of India, (1949)

[9] Odyssey Communications (P) Ltd. V. Lokvidayan Sanghatana (1988) 3 SCC 410.

[10] Directorate General of Doordarshan v Anand Patwardhan (2006) 8 SCC 433

[11] Nikhil Bhalla v. Union of India, W.P. (C) No. 7123/2018

[12] Golwalkar & Mishra, The Information Technology (intermediary guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) rules, 2021, PRS Legislative Research (2023).

[13] Anil Sharma & Hiren Harsora, A study on preferences of consumers towards international OTT platforms and Sustainability Strategy in Indian market, 2 International Journal of Management, Public Policy and Research 32–40 (2023).

[14] Thankachan Jose Kaitharath & Shruti Nirmal, Contemporary relevance of OTT platforms in the entertainment world with special reference to Indian cinema industry, 9 Journal of Management Research and Analysis 187– 190 (2022).

[15] Anil Sharma & Hiren Harsora, A study on preferences of consumers towards international OTT platforms and Sustainability Strategy in Indian market, 2 International Journal of Management, Public Policy and Research 32–40 (2023).

[16] Natalya Buzova & Marina Karelina, Judicial protection of intellectual property rights in a Digital Economy: is there a need for change?, 2 Legal Issues in the Digital Age 114–126 (2021).

[17] Natalya Buzova & Marina Karelina, Judicial protection of intellectual property rights in a Digital Economy: is there a need for change?, 2 Legal Issues in the Digital Age 114–126 (2021).

[19] Taj Television & Anr v. Rajan Mandal & Ors.,(2003) SCC. F.S.R. 22.

[20] Natalya Buzova & Marina Karelina, Judicial protection of intellectual property rights in a Digital Economy: is there a need for change?, 2 Legal Issues in the Digital Age 114–126 (2021).

[21] Fengqiao Electronic Age: Research on Online Mediation of Intellectual Property Infringement in Guangzhou 2021

[22] EH Ikpe & SS Ibekwe, The print media and the consumer in the Cyber Age, 3 Lwati: A Journal of Contemporary Research (2007).

[23] Amy K Saenger et al., The power of social media in medicine and medical education: Opportunities, risks, and rewards, 64 Clinical Chemistry 1284–1290 (2018).

[24] K. A. Abbas b. Union of Indian (1970) 2 SCC 780.

[25] Bobby Art International v. Om Pal Singh Hoon (1996) 4 SCC 1.

[26] Anand Patwardhan v. Union of India (2006) 8 SCC 433

[27] Mahesh Bhatt v. Union of India (2009) 156 DLT 725

[28] Vivek Dsouza et al., How does Indian News Media Report Smokeless Tobacco Control? A content analysis of the Gutka Ban Enforcement, 3 PLOS Global Public Health (2023).

[29] Uta Kohl, Platform regulation of hate speech – A transatlantic speech compromise?, 14 Journal of Media Law 25–49 (2022).

[30] Yash Vekaria et al., Differential tracking across topical webpages of Indian News Media, 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021 (2021).

[31] Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidance) Rules, 2011

[32] Uta Kohl, Platform regulation of hate speech – A transatlantic speech compromise?, 14 Journal of Media Law 25–49 (2022).

[33] Yash Vekaria et al., Differential tracking across topical webpages of Indian News Media, 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021 (2021).

[34] Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (IT Rules) The Constitution of India, 1950

[35] Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (IT Rules)

[36] LIC v. Manubhai D. Shah (1992) 3 SCC 637: AIR 1991 SC 171.

[38] Hrishikesh Kumar, A study on consumers’ preference towards OTT platforms during the post covid-19 lockdown periods, 10 Journal of Development Economics and Management Research Studies 65–70 (2023).

[40] Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, (AIR 2014) SC (1493).

[41] Shradha Murthy et al., The effects of OTT platforms on the Indian Film Industry, 2 REST Journal on Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence, 40–52 (2023)

[1] Authors are students at school of Legal Studies, CUSAT

[2] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956).

[3] Shoaib Shafi, ”Indian sex worker in GB Road, New Delhi’s main red light district, tells her story of pain and loss

‘(2019)

[4] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248.

[5] Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal (MANU/WB/0194/2007).

[6] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956).

[7] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956).

[8] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956), s. 2(a).

[9] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956), s. 2(f).

[10] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956), s. 2(b).

[11] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956).

[12] Kajal Mukesh Singh and Ors v. The State of Maharashtra Criminal Writ Petition No. 6065/2020 dated 24/09/2020.

[17] Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal (MANU/WB/0194/2007).

[19] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956).

[21] The Suppression of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956).

[22] The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (Act 104 of 1956), s. 3.

[24] HIV Prevention Among Sex Workers in India, available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2826108/ (last visited on April 14, 2024).

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE CASE OF ‘BOROLINE’ VS ‘BOROBEAUTY’: A LEGAL EXAMINATION OF TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT BY - PRANJAL SRIVASTAV & SHREYA SRIVASTAVA

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LABOUR LAWS IN INDIA BY: MOHAMMED MUTHAR MYDEEN.D

A STUDY ON LEGAL CHALLENGES FACED IN CYBER INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION, ACCESS TO JUSTICE BY - SHREYANK KUMAR.B

A STUDY ON THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ON THE PLANT VARIETIES PROTECTION IN INDIA BY - DR PAULINE PRIYA

THE RISE OF WOMEN IN POLICING: SHATTERING GLASS CEILING AND STEREOTYPES BY - HEMA SUDANTHIRA GNANASEKARAN & VIGNESHWARI GNANASEKARAN

ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY BY - DHOBALE SANKET NARAYAN

UNDERSTANDING OF DIGITAL ARREST: DEFINITION, METHODS AND IMPLICATIONS BY - ASMITA MALLICK & PRITHWISH GANGULI

SOCIAL BOYCOTT OF TRANSGENDER AND INDIAN CONSTITUTION - AN ANALYSIS BY – DR. M. A. THAMIZH SELVI

UNVEILING INDIA’S OTT ODYSSEY: DECODING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR PLATFORMS AND APPS BY - JASJIT SINGH

CONTEMPORARY OVERVIEW ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC HISTORY DEVELOPMENT AND STATUS QUO OF PROSTITUTION IN INDIA BY - NOHITHA ANIL & LAKSHMI PRIYA P

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[3] Shoaib Shafi, ”Indian sex worker in GB Road, New Delhi’s main red light district, tells her story of pain and loss

‘(2019)

Citation 2