[1] 9 Das, K. (2018). Geographical Indications and its Socio-economic Impact on Regional Development: A Study of Darjeeling Tea. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(3), 45-57.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2018). Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge: Cultural Expression, Genetic Resources and Traditional Cultural Expressions. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/indigenous/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_19/wipo_grtkf_ic_19_www_619850.pdf
[3] UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2013). Creative Economy Report 2013: Widening Local Development Pathways. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/creative-economy/sites/creative-economy/files/creativeeconomy-report-2013.pdf 21 Hutter, M., & Richards, G
[4] Singhal, A., & Goyal, V. (2020). Intellectual Property Rights in Geographical Indications: The Case of Darjeeling Tea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(3), 425-444.
[5] Sudha, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2013). Geographic Indications and Its Impact on Rural Economy - A Case Study of Kanchipuram Silk Sarees. Indian Journal of Regional Science, 45(1), 93-105.
[6] Raje, P., & Barua, S. (2018). Branding Agricultural Products: Role of Geographical Indications - A Case of Alphonso Mango. Journal of Agricultural Development and Policy, 28(1), 40-62.
[7] Bhale, U., Choudhary, N., & Patil, D. (2018). Geographical Indication of Nagpur Orange: Branding and Opportunities. Journal of Global Communication, 11(1), 66-74.
[8] Singh, N., & Mandal, S. (2017). Banarasi Silk Sarees: A Geographical Indication for Economic Development of Varanasi. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(3), 399-412
[9] Sharma, S., & Patra, P. (2018). Protecting Basmati Rice: An Intellectual Property Perspective. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 565-582.
[10] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2013). Geographical Indications: A Guide to the International Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications.
[11] Chatterjee, S. (2017). Legal Protection of Geographical Indications in India: An Appraisal. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22(4), 220-235.
[12] Ali, A. (2015). The Economic Impact of Geographical Indications: A Review of Literature. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 18(3-4), 160-173.
[13] 5 De Medeiros, D. G., & De Carvalho, F. M. (2018). Geographic Indications: A Tool for Sustainable Rural Development. Journal of Rural Studies, 57, 135-145.
[14] Janssens, E., & Huysmans, M. (2015). Territoriality and Globalization in European Geographical Indications for Food and Agricultural Products. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 22(3), 347-363.
Citation
[1]In 1960, the internet was first created as a tool for interconnection of computer as amongst military personnel known as ARPANER (Advanced Research Projects Agency Network) to communicate and share data.
[2]N S Nappinai, Technology law Decoded, 36 (LexisNexis, New Delhi 1st edn., 2024)
[3]Justice Gavai said, “Law is not static, but it is dynamic. Available at https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/law-changes-as-per-needs-of-society-sc-justice-gavai-6017386/#:~:text=During%20his%20speech%2C%20Justice%20Gavai,to%20the%20needs%20of%20society%E2%80%A6
[9]Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed.) defines crime as “An act that the law makes punishable, the beach of a legal duty treated as the subject matter of a criminal proceeding Also termed criminal wrong.
(i) follows a woman and contacts, or attempts to contact such woman to foster personal interaction repeatedly despite a clear indication of disinterest by such woman; or
(ii) monitors the use by a woman of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication,
commits the offence of stalking;
[17] Section 67 of the act attracted only when person publishes or sends salacious material through electronic or communication device or Internet.
[23] Section 67 of the Information Technology Act 2000, Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in Electonic form.
[24] Section 67A of Information Technology Act 2000, Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act, etc.
[25]Section 67B of Information Technology Act 2000, Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material depicting children in sexually explicit act.
[26]In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the right to live is not merely a physical right but includes within its ambit the right to live with human dignity.
[27]Protection of life and personal liberty No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.
·Refer to Order XXI, Rules 35-57 of the CPC for detailed provisions on attachment of property and the procedure for securing the decree amount through attachment.
·See Order XXI, Rules 64-100 of the CPC for the process of sale of attached property by public auction and the distribution of sale proceeds to satisfy the decree.
·Consult Order XXI, Rules 37-46 of the CPC for the circumstances under which a judgment debtor may be arrested and detained for non-compliance with the decree.
·See Order XXI, Rules 32-34 of the CPC for provisions regarding the court's power to order the delivery of specific movable property to the decree holder.
·Consult other relevant provisions of the CPC for additional miscellaneous provisions related to execution proceedings, such as interest on the decretal amount during execution.
Citation
Citation
[1]Dr.S.R.Myneni’s Contract-I General Principles, 115 (1st ed., 2010-11)
[2]Avtar Singh’s , Contract and Specific Relief, 69 (12th ed.,2017)
[3] Robert Whitman, Incorporation by Reference in Commercial Contracts, 21 Md. L. Rev. 1 (1961)
[4]Avtar Singh’s , Contract and Specific Relief, 70-78 (12th ed.,2017)
[5]AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011)