INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

REVISITING THE PROCEDURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIA AND USA BY - ANMOL TANWAR

Authors : ANMOL TANWAR

Registration ID : 107026 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7026

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : anmolt0107@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

A STUDY ON CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF PRISON VIOLENCE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TAMILNADU BY - S ASWATH & MS. M. MANONMANI

Authors : S ASWATH & MS. M. MANONMANI

Registration ID : 107024 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7024 & IJLRA7025

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : aswathssl17@gmail.com & manonmanim.ssl@saveetha.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

THE SUFFOCATION OF ACID ATTACKS: THE TALE OF SCAR BY - TUSHAR ARYAN

Authors : TUSHAR ARYAN

Registration ID : 107023 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7023

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : harshllba.786@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

AN ANALYSIS ON PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER VARIOUS CONVENTIONS BY *PROF. DR. ANJINA REDDY K.R.

Authors : PROF. DR. ANJINA REDDY K.R.

Registration ID : 107022 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7022

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : dr.anjinareddykr@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

ANALYSIS OF INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY BY - ANISHA KUMARI

Authors : ANISHA KUMARI

Registration ID : 107021 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7021

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : advoanisha.kumari@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

SOCIAL MEDIA TRIALS: A THREAT TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM BY - ANISHA KUMARI

Authors : ANISHA KUMARI

Registration ID : 107020 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7020

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : advoanisha.kumari@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: BETWEEN THE RELATION OF INTERNATIONAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW. BY - ANISHA KUMARI

Authors : ANISHA KUMARI

Registration ID : 107019 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7019

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : advoanisha.kumari@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 BY - ANISHA KUMARI

Authors : ANISHA KUMARI

Registration ID : 107018 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7018

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : advoanisha.kumari@gmail.com

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

CHANGING PARADIGM OF COAL BLOCK ALLOCATION: A STEP TOWARDS COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM BY - SHIVAM AGRAWAL

Authors : SHIVAM AGRAWAL

Registration ID : 107017 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7017

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : 22shivamagrawal@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BLACK RAPE VICTIMS IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE MARGINALIZED SECTION OF INDIA BY - DR. NAVIN KUMAR

Authors : DR. NAVIN KUMAR

Registration ID : 107016 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7016

Year : March-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : battan07@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Gregory A. Caldeira, Constitutional Change in America: Dynamics of Ratification under Article V, 15 Publius 29 (1985).

[2]“D. D. Basu, Commentary on the Constitution of India (2012).”

[3]“Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).”

[4] Hugh Evander, The Doctrine of Amendability of the United States Constitution, 7 Indiana L. Rev. 457 (1932),

[5] William Marbury, The Limitations upon the Amending Power, 33 Harvard L. Rev. 225 (1919).

[6]“Shankari Prasad v. Union of India, AIR 1951 SC 458.”

[7]“Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, (1967) SCR 762.”

[8]“Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461.”

[10]“Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SCC 2299.”

[11]“George D. Skinner, Intrinsic Limitations on the Power of Constitutional Amendment, 18 Michigan L. Rev. 213 (1920).”

[12]“National Prohibition Cases, (1920) 253 US 350.”

[14] Erwin Chemerinsky, Amending the Constitution, 96 Michigan L. Rev. 1564 (1998).

[1]Human Rights Commission, https://www.humanrightscommission.ky/human-rights-treaties (last visited on: October 15, 2023)

[2] OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-and-mechanisms/international-human-rights-law (last visited on: October 15, 2023)

[3] NHRC, https://nhrc.nic.in/sites/default/files/A_Handbook_on_International_HR_Conventions.pdf (last visited on: October 15, 2023)

[4] It reads: "The Government of India declares that for reference of any dispute to the International Court of Justice for decision in terms of Article 22 of the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination, the consent of all parties to the dispute is necessary in each individual case."

[5] India’s Declarations/Reservations on the CEDAW

Declarations: "i) With regard to articles 5 (a) and 16 (1) of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Government of the Republic of India declares that it shall abide by and ensure these provisions in conformity with its policy of non-interference in the personal affairs of any Community without its initiative and consent.

ii) With regard to article 16 (2) of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Government of the Republic of India declares that though in principle it fully supports the principle of compulsory registration of marriages, it is not practical in a vast country like India with its variety of customs, religions and level of literacy."

Reservation: "With regard to article 29 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Government of the Republic of India declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of this article."

[7] Section 12(f) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (PHRA).

[9] NHRC, https://nhrc.nic.in/faqs/what-functions-have-been-assigned-commission-under-act-0 (last visited on: October 15, 2023)

[1] By – Shivam Agrawal, B.A.LL.B. (Hons.), Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur; LL.M., The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata.

[2] COAL – INDIAN ENERGY CHOICE, available at https://coal.nic.in/en/major-statistics/coal-indian-energy-choice (Last visited on October 25, 2022).

[3] Chengappa, M. M. (2017). The Move from Preferential License/Lease Regime to Competitive Bidding through Auction: An Examination of Law Relating to Coal Block Allocation in India. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 8(2), 46-58, 46.

[4] Ministry of Coal, Office Memorandum, No. 13011/3/92-CA (July 14, 1992).

[5] The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), Report No. 7 of 2012-13 – Performance Audit of Allocation of Coal Blocks and Augmentation of Coal Production, Ministry of Coal, 22, available at https://cag.gov.in/en/audit-report/details/1837 (Last visited on October 25, 2022).

[6] Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary, (2014) 9 SCC 516.

[7] The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Schedule I, Part A, Item 1.

[8] Arpita Asha Khanna, Governance in Coal Mining: Issues and Challenges, August 2013, 8-9, available at https://www.teriin.org/projects/nfa/2008-2013/pdf/nfa-WkP9-coal-governance.pdf (Last visited on October 25, 2022).

[9] See The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; and The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

[10] The Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, The Long Title.

[11] Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 [Repealed], available at https://www.scconline.com/Members/BrowseResult.aspx (Last visited on October 25, 2022).

[12] Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary, (2014) 9 SCC 516.

[13] The Auction by Competitive Bidding of Coal Mines Rules, 2012.

[14] The Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015, The Long Title.

[15] The Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015, Schedule IV, Part B, Item 1.

[16] See The Mineral Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020; and The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation)

Amendment Act, 2021.

[17] The Coal Blocks Allocation Rules, 2017, The Long Title.

[18] The Coal Blocks Allocation Rules, 2017, Rule 2(1) (k).

[19] See The Coal Blocks Allocation (Amendment) Rules, 2020.

[20] Baijnath Kadio v. State of Bihar, (1969) 3 SCC 838. See also Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orrissa, (1961) 2 SCR 537; State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch and Co., (1964) 4 SCR 461.

[21] Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd. v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 13 SCC 1.

[22] Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. v. Union of India, (2012) 11 SCC 1.

[23] Orissa Cement Ltd. v. State of Orissa, 1991 Supp. (1) SCC 430.

[24] Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. State of Bihar, (1990) 4 SCC 557.

[25] Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. v. Union of India, (2012) 11 SCC 1.

[26] Amritlal Nathubhai Shah v. Union of India, (1976) 4 SCC 108.

[29] Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India, (2012) 3 SCC 1.

[30] In Re: Special Reference No. 1 of 2012, (2012) 10 SCC 1.

[31] E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1974) 4 SCC 3.

[32] State of Tamil Nadu v. L. Abu Kavur Bai, (1984) 1 SCC 515.

[33] See M/s Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State of Jammu and Kashmir, (1980) 4 SCC 1; M.P. Oil Extraction v. State of M.P., (1997) 7 SCC 592 inter alia.

[34] The Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, §3(ae). It reads: “mineral concession” means either a reconnaissance permit, prospecting licence, mining lease, composite licence or a combination of any of these and the expression “concession” shall be construed accordingly.

[35] The Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, §3(a). It reads: “composite licence” means the prospecting licence-cum-mining lease which is a two stage concession granted for the purpose of undertaking prospecting operations followed by mining operations in a seamless manner.

[36] The Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, §11A.

[37] The Coal Blocks Allocation Rules, 2017, Rule 2(1) (c).

[38] Goa Foundation v. Union of India, (2014) 6 SCC 590.

[39] State of Orrisa v. Union of India, (2001) 1 SCC 429. See also Amritlal Nathubhai Shah v. Union of India, (1976) 4 SCC 108.

[40] Srikrishna, B. N. (2011). Beyond Federalism. India International Centre Quarterly, 38(3/4), 386–407, 407.

[1]Kelly, Liz & Radford, Jill, Sexual Violence Against Women and Girls, An Approach to an International Overview, in Rethinking Violence against Women, Dobash and Dobash eds., Sage Publications, London, (1998), p. 53.

[2]Preliminary Report Submitted by the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its Causes and Consequences, Ms. Rhadika Coomaraswamy, in Accordance with Commission on Human Rights Resolution 1994/95, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1995/42, 22 November 1994, para. 20.

[3]Schulhofer, Stephen, Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law, p. 24.

[5]Dr. Justice V.S. Malimath, S. Varadachary, IAS, (Retd.), Amitabh Gupta, IPS, (Retd.), Prof. (Dr.) N.R. Madhava

Menon, D.V. Subba Rao “Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System” Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, 2003.

[6]Tina P. Lapsia, “Impact of the “Nirbhaya” Rape Case: Isolated Phenomenon or Social Change” UCONN Library,

Spring 5-1-2015.

[7]Deliege, R “The World of Untouchables”, New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1997.

[8]Massey, J “History and Dalit Identity”, New Delhi, Indian Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge (ISPCK), 1995.

[9]Aloysius Irudayam s.j. Aloysius Irudayam s.j. Jayshree P. Mangubhai Jayshree P. Mangubhai Joel G. Lee “Dalit Women Speak Out Dalit Women Speak Out Violence against Dalit Women in India “, Overview Report Overview Report of Study in Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Study in Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Study in Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Tamil Nadu/Pondicherry and Uttar Pradesh, 2006.

[10]Justice Denied: Sexual Violence & Intersectional Discrimination-Barriers to Accessing Justice for Dalit Women and Girls in Haryana, India, 2020.

[11]Palmer, Colin A, “Passageways- interpretative History of Black America” Publisher, Wadsworth, 1998.

[12]Report of the New York State Judicial Commission on Minorities, Vol.4, 1991.

[13] Richie, “More Slavery at the South,” New York Independent, pp. 196–200. 1912.

[14] Elizabeth Hinton “An Unjust Burden: The Disparate Treatment of Black Americans in the Criminal Justice System”

Vera Institutte of Justice, 2018.

[15] Danielle L. McGuire, “It Was like All of Us Had Been Raped": Sexual Violence, Community Mobilization, and the African American Freedom Struggle, The Journal of American History, Vol. 91, No. 3 (Dec., 2004), pp. 906-931.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

REVISITING THE PROCEDURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIA AND USA BY - ANMOL TANWAR

A STUDY ON CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF PRISON VIOLENCE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TAMILNADU BY - S ASWATH & MS. M. MANONMANI

THE SUFFOCATION OF ACID ATTACKS: THE TALE OF SCAR BY - TUSHAR ARYAN

AN ANALYSIS ON PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER VARIOUS CONVENTIONS BY *PROF. DR. ANJINA REDDY K.R.

ANALYSIS OF INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY BY - ANISHA KUMARI

SOCIAL MEDIA TRIALS: A THREAT TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM BY - ANISHA KUMARI

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: BETWEEN THE RELATION OF INTERNATIONAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW. BY - ANISHA KUMARI

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 BY - ANISHA KUMARI

CHANGING PARADIGM OF COAL BLOCK ALLOCATION: A STEP TOWARDS COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM BY - SHIVAM AGRAWAL

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BLACK RAPE VICTIMS IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE MARGINALIZED SECTION OF INDIA BY - DR. NAVIN KUMAR

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

[12]“National Prohibition Cases, (1920) 253 US 350.”

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[11]Palmer, Colin A, “Passageways- interpretative History of Black America” Publisher, Wadsworth, 1998.

Citation 2