INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

^{^[1]} Information Technology (Guidelines For Intermediaries And Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.

^{^[2]} The Information Technology (Intermediaries guidelines) Rules, 2011.

^{^[4]} Information Technology (Guidelines For Intermediaries And Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021, r 8(1).

^{^[5]} Information Technology (Guidelines For Intermediaries And Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021, r 8(3).

^{^[7]} The Cable Television Networks regulation) Act 1995, s 5.

^{^[9]} The Constitution of India 1950, art 19(1)(a).

^{^[10]} The Constitution of India 1950, art 19(1)(g).

[3]Dr. Ashok Jain, Intellectual Property Law- I (3^rd ed. 2011)

[5]Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH, C- 145/10 (the Court of Justice of European Union, 2011)

[6]LTC Harms, “Originality” and “Reproduction” in Copyright Law with Special Reference to Photographs, Vol 6 No 5 (2013)

[7]Temple Islands Collections v. New English Teas PCC 1 (2012)

[8]Andres Guadamuz, The monkey selfie:copyright lessons for originality in photographs and internet jurisdiction, Vol 5 No 1 (2016)

[9]Harper &Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985)

[10]Meg Dolan, Misusing Misuse: Why Copyright Misuse Is Unnecessary, Vol 17 No 2(2007)

[1] Jane P. Sheldon, Carla A. Pfeffer et.al. Beliefs about the Etiology of Homosexuality and about the Ramifications of Discovering Its Possible Genetic Origin, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545255/ (30th December 2021, 12:11 PM)

[3] The Offences against Persons Act, 1828 (9 Geo. 4 c. 31).

[1]Ram Ahuja, Criminology 215 (Rawat Publication 2020).

[2]Mamta Rao, Law relating to women and Children 213 (Eastern Book Company 2019).

[5]Prof. S.N. Misra, Indian Penal Code 702 (20^th ed. 2017).

[6] Vibha Arora, Women Laws 243 (Universal Law Publishing 2017).

[7] Walker v. Northumberland Country Council, 1995 ICR 702: 1995 IRLR 35.

[9] K. D. Gaur, Criminal Law 659 (Lexis Nexis, 2019).

[12] Shrestha Nandy, Increasing Sexual Harassment cases in India: An intimidating reality, iPleaders blog (May 2, 2022, 9:29 PM), https://blog.ipleaders.in/increasing-sexual-harassment-cases-in-india-an-intimidating-reality/

[17] Irene Mackay and Jill Earnshaw, Striking Around Sexual Harassment” (1995) 145 NEW LJ 340.

[20] Burlington Industries Inc v. Ellerth, 524 US 742 (1998): 141 L ED 2d 633.

[21] Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 US 775 (1998): US Lexis 4216.

[22]Linda Greenhouse, “Court Spells out of Rules for Finding Sex Harassment”, N.Y. Times, June 27, 1998 pg. 1.

[23] Davis v. Monroe Country Board of Education, 526 US 629 (1999).

[25]The IWI: International Women’s Initiative, (Last visited: May 9, 2022).

[32]Dr. S.C. Tripathi & Vibha Arora, Law relating to Women & Children 26(Central Law Publications, 2019).

[35] Dr. J.N. Pandey, Constitutional Law of India, 112 (Central Law Agency, 54^th Ed.).

[36] Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, (1993) 2 SCC 746: 1993 SCC (Cri) 527.

[37] Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, (1985) 2 SCC 556: 1985 SCC (Cri) 245.

[38]Supreme Court of India, https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/13856.pdf. (Last visited: May 24, 2022).

[39] Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K. Chopra, (1991) 1 SCC 759.

[40] Medha Kotwal Lele v. Union of India, (2013) 1 SCC 297: (2013) 1 SCC (Cri) 459.

[3] Dr. J.N. Pandey, Constitutional Law Of India, Fifty Third Edition

[4] Vaishali Bansal & Soumali Roy, All you need to know about marital rape, Blog. ipleader, 19. May.22, 9:45 pm, https://blog.ipleaders.in/need-know-marital-rape/

[5] Theresa Fus, Criminalizing Marital Rape: A Comparison of Judicial and Legislative Approaches, 39 Vanderbilt Law Review 481(2021), 8:25 pm

https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1484&context=vjtl

[6] Theresa Fus, Criminalizing Marital Rape: A Comparison of Judicial and Legislative Approaches, 39 Vanderbilt Law Review 481(2021), pg.483, 9:13 pm

https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1484&context=vjtl

[7] Adamo, Sonya A. Note, "The Injustice of the Marital Rape Exemption: A Survey of Common Law Countries." American University International Law Review 4, no. 3 (1989): 555-589, 9:59 pm https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1682&context=auilr

[8] Theresa Fus, Criminalizing Marital Rape: A Comparison of Judicial and Legislative Approaches, 39 Vanderbilt Law Review 481(2021), 11:11, pg.483

[9] A comparison of Judicial and Legislative Approaches, supra note 8, 481 at 483

[10] Theresa Fus, Criminalizing Marital Rape: A Comparison of Judicial and Legislative Approaches, 39 Vanderbilt Law Review 481(2021), 11:11, pg.483

[11] Pallavi Prasad, Why it’s still legal for Indian men to rape their wives, 11:43, https://theswaddle.com/marital-rape-inda-decriminalized-crime/

[12] A comparison of Judicial and Legislative Approaches, supra note 10, 481 at 483

[13] Rothman Lily, when spousal rape first became a crime in the U.S., 28. July.2015,https://time.com/3975175/spousal-rape-case-history/

[14] Deborah C. England, The History of marital rape laws, Criminal Defense Lawyer,https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/crime-penalties/marital-rape.htm (last visited on May. 24, 2022)

[16] Deborah C. England, supra note 14

[18] When spousal rape first became a crime in the U.S., supra note 13

[20] When spousal rape first became a crime in the USA, supra note 13

[22] The Texas Penal code is the principal criminal code of the U.S. state of Texas.

[24] Marital rape laws and penalties, supra note. 23

[25] Marital rape laws and penalties, supra note. 23

[26] Supra note 23

[27] California Penal Code, 1872, section 262, United State of America

[28] California Penal Code,1872, section 261, United State of America

[29] Sakshi Mehta, Criminalizing Marital Rape: A Comparative Analysis of Indian and US Laws, 13 PA, 1 ( Dec. 2020), http://www.penacclaims.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Sakshi-Mehta.pdf

[30] South Carolina Code, 1976, section 16-3-615, United State of America

[31] South Carolina Code of 1976, section 16-3-651 (h), United State of America

[32] South Carolina Code of 1976, United State of America

[33] Indian Penal Code,1860 , No.45, Act of Parliament, 1860 (India)

[35] Independent thought v. Union Of India, (2017) 10 SCC 800

[36] Sakshi Mehta, Criminalizing Marital Rape: A Comparative Analysis of Indian and US Laws, 13 PA, at 4 ( Dec. 2020), (25.May.2022, 9 pm)http://www.penacclaims.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Sakshi-Mehta.pdf

[38] Criminalizing marital rape: a comparative analysis of Indian and US laws, supra note 36 at 4

[39] The Constitution(One Hundred and First Amendment)Act,2016

[40] Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012

[41] The Juvenile Justice(Care and Protection of Children) Act,2015

[42] State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar, (1952) 75 SCR 284

[43] Criminalised marital rape : a comparative analysis of Indian and US Laws, supra note 36 at 6.

[48] Marital Rape and Violation of Constitution Provisions, supra note. 47

[50] Marital rape and violation of constitutional provision, supra note. 47.

[51] Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration, (2009) 9 SCC 1.

[52] Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2018) SC 1676

[53] Sakshi Mehta, Criminalizing Marital Rape: A Comparative Analysis of Indian and US Laws, 13 PA, at 4 Dec. 2020, (27.May.2022, 10 pm)http://www.penacclaims.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Sakshi-Mehta.pdf

[1]https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/criminal-law-amendment/

[2]https://blog.ipleaders.in/criminal-law-amendment-act-2018-2/#Criminal_Law_Amendment_Act_2018

[3]Id.; Rafiq v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1980) 4 SCC 262.

[5]http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s244535.htm.

[6]Martin S. Fiebert, References Examining Men as Victims of Women’s Sexual Coercion, 4 Sexuality and Culture 81-88 (2000).

[7]National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, AIR 2014 SC 1863.

[8]KesavanandaBharati v. State of Kerela, AIR 1973 SC 1461.

[10]R. Sreekumar, Access to Justice for Under Trial Prisoners: Problems and Solutions, Human Rights Initiative (1992).

[11]3 Neena S. Sawant, Suicide in Indian Prisoners, 2 Annals of Indian Psychiatry 1-3 (2018).

^{^[1]}Abhyudaya Agarwal & Prithwijit Gangopadhyay, use of modern scientific tests in investigation and evidence: mere desperation or justifiable in public interest? Vol.2 NUJS LAW REVIEW , 31-54 (2009)

^{^[3]}Suresh Bada Math, Supreme Court judgment on polygraph, narco-analysis & brain-mapping: A boon or a bane,

INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH (May29,2020,1PM)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171915/

^{^[4]}Dinesh Dalmia v. State. Dinesh Dalmia v. State, CriLJ 2006 2401

^{^[6]}Suresh Bada Math, Supreme Court judgment on polygraph, narco-analysis & brain-mapping: A boon or a bane,

INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH (May29,2020,1PM)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171915/

^{^[7]}Jajodia(Mozika), Jyoti. Emerging right to privacy an Indian perspective, SHODHGANGA@INFLIBNET (May 13, 2020 2PM) https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/137097

^{^[8]}In Francis Coralie vs. Union Territory of Delhi.^, AIR 1981 746

^{^[10]}Jajodia(Mozika), Jyoti. Emerging right to privacy an Indian perspective, SHODHGANGA@INFLIBNET (May 13, 2020 2PM) https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/137097

^{^[12]} Jajodia(Mozika), Jyoti. Emerging right to privacy an Indian perspective, SHODHGANGA@INFLIBNET (May 13, 2020 2PM) https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/137097

^{^[13]}⁸ Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881 Sec.131

^{^[14]}The Prevention of Money Laundering ACT, 2002 Sec. 71

[5] AIR 1957 Raj. 305, confirmed by the supreme court in State of Rajasthan v. Vidyawati, AIR 1962 SC 933

[10] All the decisions cited by the Chief Justice in present case have followed the P&O case. See also Ram Gulam v.UP Government AIR 1950 All206, Union of India v. Harbans Singh, AIR 1959 Punj.39; K.Krishnamurthy v. State of A.P A.I.R 1961 A.P. 283.

[13] Friedmann, Law in a Changing Society 383-391(1959)

[14] Friedmann, Law and Social Change 273 quoted in Law Commission’s First Report: Liability of State in Tort32 (1956)

[15] In Secretary of State v Cockcraft,(1914) I.L.R.39.Mad. 351, 357, “benefit” was derived an exception to state immunity. Union of India v. Ayed Ram, A.I.R 1958 Pat 439.

[16] https://ir.nbu.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/2776/12/12_chapter%205.pdf

[17] V.Edwin M. Borchard, “Government Responsibility in Tort”,Y.L.J,757(1926)

[18] Quoted by G.P Verma, State Liability in India, 25,(1993)..

[19] https://ir.nbu.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/2776/12/12_chapter%205.pdf

[22] 1 Section 2 of the Crown Proceeding Act 1947

[24] See Gregory C. Sisk, Official Wrongdoing and the Civil Liability of the Federal Government and Officers, 8 U. St. Thomas L.J. 295, 322 (2011), David W. Fuller, Intentional Torts and Other Exceptions to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 8 U. St. Thomas L.J. 375, 377 (2011)

[27] In re KBR, Inc., Burn Pit Litig., 744 F.3d 326, 331 (4^th Cir. 2014)

[28] 28 U.S.C. § 2671; U.S. Tobacco, 899 F.3d at 248

[29] 487 U.S. 500, 507 (1988) , United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc., 440 U.S. 715, 728 (1979)

[30] Boyle, 487 U.S. at 512 , Saleh v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1, 8 (D.C. Cir. 2009), Koohi v. United States, 976 F.2d 1328, 1336–37 (9^th Cir. 1992)

[31]Cabalce v. Thomas E. Blanchard & Assocs., Inc., 797 F.3d 720, 731 (9^th Cir. 2015)

[32] Durga Das Basu, Administrative law, Kamal Law House Kolkata, 2004. P 378

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

Understanding the Impact of the IT Intermediary Guidelines on Digital News Agencies (By: Shourya Pratap Singh Tomar)

Decriminalisation of Sec. 377 and it’s Impact on the Society (By- SHERLY.J & Renuga. C)

GOING BANANAS OVER A “MONKEY SELFIE”: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON A CASE OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT (By- Pritha Ghosh)

“CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HIJAB JUDGEMENT 2022” (By- Aanchal Agarwal)

Decriminalization of section 377 of IPC: Securing Rights of LGBTQ+ Community (By- Sujoy Paul)

SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACES WITH REGARDS TO CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS (By – Rashmi Singha)

MARITAL RAPE: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS (By- Nending Sonia)

SHIFTING PERSPECTIVES: THE EXIGENCY OF GENDER- NEUTRALITY IN INDIAN RAPE LAWS (By-Kriti Gera & Adv. Arun Pratap Singh Rajawat)

EXPANDING CONTOURS OF PRIVACY RIGHTS (By- Shubharth Shukla & Arima Pankaj)

VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF STATE IN INDIA AND ABROAD (By-Deepansha Vij)

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2