INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

USE OF ONLINE PLATFORM FOR ILLEGAL SELLING AND GAMBLING BY - MS. ANANYA GOYAL & DR. JYOTI DHARM

Authors : MS. ANANYA GOYAL & DR. JYOTI DHARM

Registration ID : 106869 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6869 & IJLRA6870

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ananyaagrawalgoyal2008@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2024-66553598/USE OF ONLINE PLATFORM FOR ILLEGAL SELLING AND GAM

CONTRA PROFERENTEM: AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF IT’S HISTORICAL EVOLUTION, PRINCIPLES, AND IMPACT ON INDIAN CONTRACT LAW BY - GULNAR ARORA

Authors : GULNAR ARORA

Registration ID : 106868 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6868

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : gulnararora@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2024-42728243/CONTRA PROFERENTEM: AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF IT’S

ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY TO GUARANTEE ACCESS TO JUSTICE BY - PUSHPITA MITRA

Authors : PUSHPITA MITRA

Registration ID : 106867 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6867

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ul23ba018@stu.xim.edu.in

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2024-59592444/ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY TO GUARANTEE ACCESS TO JUSTICE

A COMPARATIVE DOCTRINAL STUDY OF TRADEMARK DILUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF SEMIOTIC DISOBEDIENCE BY - BARKHA SINGH

Authors : BARKHA SINGH

Registration ID : 106866 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6866

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : barkhasingh@nalsar.ac.in

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2024-26468884/A COMPARATIVE DOCTRINAL STUDY OF TRADEMARK DILUTIO

HARNESSING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR WOMEN EMPOWERMENT: A CATALYST FOR SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRESS BY: ADV. BHUMI TANDON

Authors : ADV. BHUMI TANDON

Registration ID : 106865 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6865

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : 10bhumitandon@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2024-65274768/HARNESSING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR WOMEN EMPOW

SILENCE SPEAKS VOLUMES: DO WE NEED TO INTRODUCE A GENERAL DUTY OF DISCLOSURE? BY - RUDRA SINSINWAR

Authors : RUDRA SINSINWAR

Registration ID : 106864 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6864

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : rudra.sinsinwar@nls.ac.in

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2024-97882757/SILENCE SPEAKS VOLUMES: DO WE NEED TO INTRODUCE A

TRACING ORIGINS OF DOCTRINE OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY BY - HARIHAR JAGANNATH

Authors : HARIHAR JAGANNATH

Registration ID : 106863 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6863

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : harihar2e@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2024-54969471/TRACING ORIGINS OF DOCTRINE OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY

IMPORTANCE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE IN ANCIENT AND MODERN TIMES CONCERNING MODERN TECHNIQUES IN CONDUCTING THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS BY: PROF.(DR.) S. JAMES & RENUBALA WAHENGBAM

Authors : PROF. DR. S. JAMES & RENUBALA WAHENGBAM

Registration ID : 106861 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6861 & IJLRA6862

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : drjames23miu.edu@gmail.com & renubalawajengbam08@gmail.com

Page No : 36 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

CYBER CRIMES IN WEST BENGAL AND THE CHALLENGES AHEAD CONCERNING & THE ROLE OF CYBER CRIMES INVESTIGATION CELL (CCLC) KOLKATA FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CYBER CRIME SUSPECTS BY - PRITHWISH GANGULI & PROF DR S. JAMES

Authors : PRITHWISH GANGULI & PROF DR S. JAMES

Registration ID : 106859 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6859 & IJLRA6860

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : prithwishganguli@gmail.com & drjames23miu.edu@gmail.com

Page No : 33 | No of times Downloads: 0065

BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTING, DIFFERENCE BETWEEN USA AND INDIAN PERSPECTIVE BY: MAYURI HANSDA

Authors : MAYURI HANSDA

Registration ID : 1068568Published Paper ID: IJLRA6858

Year : Feb-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : mayurihansda92@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011, Rule 3(2), (India).

[2] Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011, Rule 6, (India).

[3] Dr. Zaheer Ahmed v Union of India & Ors., Writ Petition no. 11711/2018, Delhi HC, 2019.

[5] Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887,§3 (4 of 1887) (India).

[6] M/s Gaussian networks Pvt. Ltd. v Monica Lakhanpal and State of NCT Delhi, C.R.P. 119/2012, Order dated 21.04.2016 (Delhi, April 21, 2016).

[7] All Kerala Online Lottery Dealers Associations v State of Kerala, [(2016) 2 SCC 161].

[1] Dr. O.N. Ravi, The Contractual Interpretation Rule- Contra Proferentem: It’s Relevance in Modern Law, 2, CMR Uni. J. Cont. Leg. Aff., 112, 113 (2022).

[3] Aparaijita Haripriya Mannava, The Legal Validity of Self-Prescribed Rules of Interpretation and Construction of Contracts, 5 Int. J. Law Man. & Hum., 859, 859-860 (2022).

[5] Vincet R. Martorana & Michael K. Zitelli, A Guide to Contract Interpretation, Reed Smith LLP, 1, 5 (2013).

[6] HEIN KOTZ, Contract Law TRANSLATED BY GILL MERTENS & TONY WEIR, CH.6 (Oxford, 2017).

[8] Peter Cserne, Policy Considerations in Contract Interpretation: The Contra Proferentem Rule from A Comparative Law and Economics Perspective, 5 Uni. Hull, 1, 114 (2007).

[10] David Horton, Flipping the Script: Contra Proferentem and Standard Form Contracts, 80, Uni. Col. Law Rev., 432, 473 (2009).

[11] SIR KIM LEWISON, The Interpretation of Contracts, 360 (South Asian Reprint 2016).

[13] See Article 1157 & 1158 of The French Code Civil, 1804; Article 1284 & 1286 of The Spanish Codigo Civil, 2016; Article 1367-1369 of The Italian Codice Civil, 1942; Article 4.4 & 4.5 of The UNIDROIT Principles.

[15] Characteristically, the rule was included in all the European codifications until the end of the 19^th century, but not in general contract law rules. These countries have codified the contra proferentem rule for standard form of contracts only. Later, mainly in accord with the European directive, every non-negotiated consumer contracts became subject to the rule too.

[19] Dr. REINHARD ZIMMERMANN, The Law of Obligations, Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, 639-640 (Juta & Co. Ltd, 1992).

[22] Jonna McCunn, The Contra Proferentem Rule: Contract Law’s Great Survivor, 39(3), Oxf. J. Leg. Stud., 483, 505 (2019).

[25] Justice Binnie, Co-operators Life Insurance Co. v. Gibbens, (2009) 3 SCR 605.

[26] Houghton v. Trafalgar Insurance Co. Ltd., (1954) 1 QB 247.

[27] Terson Ltd. v. Stevenage Development Corporation, (1963) EWCA Civ J1023-3.

[28] Johnson v. Edgware & Railway Co., 55 E.R. 982.

[29] Savil Brothers Ltd. v. Bethell, (1902) 2 Ch 253.

[31] CDV Software Entertainment AG v. Gamecock Media Europe Ltd., (2009) EWHC 2965 (Ch).

[32] Cornish v. Accident Insurance Co., Civil Action No. 3:06CV-344-DW.

[34] J.W CARTER, Carter’s Breach of Contract, 48 (Hart Publishing, 2018).

[35] MP Ram Mohan & Anmol Jain, Exclusion Clauses Under the Indian Contract Law: A Need to Account for Unreasonableness,13 NUJS L. Rev., 1, 2 (2020).

[36] EDWIN PEEL, Treital on the Law of Contract, 7-15 (Sweet & Maxwell,2020).

[39] Section 91 through Section 97, Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

[40] Abhishek Akshantaka, Analyzing the Jurisdictional Arbitrage Potency of Indian Contract Law: With the Distinct Application of the Parol Evidence Rule of Contract Interpretation, 8, Asian Law Public Policy Rev., 137, 142-143 (2023).

[42] Halbury’s Laws of England (5^th ed, 2016) 60, para 105.

[43] United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S. Orient Treasures Pvt. Ltd., 2016 (3) SCC 49.

[44] M/S. I.P. & Investment Corpn. V. New India Assuance Co. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 1130 of 2007.

[45] Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, AIR 2012 SC 2829.

[46] General Assurance Society Ltd. v. Chandmull Jain and Anr., 1966 SCR (3) 500.

[47] United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S. Pushpalaya Printers, AIR 2004 SC 1700.

[48] Namrata Singh & Ors. V. Director, General Civil Aviation, AIR 2017 (NOC) 692 (DEL.).

[49] Bank of India v. K. Mohandas, & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 1942 of 2009.

[50] Sushilben Indravadan Gandhi v. The New Indian Assurance Company, (2021) 7 SCC 151.

[1] Marc Galanter & Jayanth K. Krishnan, Bread for the Poor: Access to Justice and the Rights of the Needy in India, (2005), https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=682324

[2] Estelle Hurter, Access to Justice: To Dream the Impossible Dream?, 44 Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 408 (2011), https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/CILSA/article/view/11532

[3] Increasing Access to Justice with Technology, Legal Management, https://www.alanet.org/legal-management/2021/january/departments/increasing-access-to-justice-with-technology

[4] Federico Ast, The Role of Technology to Guarantee Access to Justice, Astec (Jun. 22, 2020), https://medium.com/astec/the-role-of-technology-to-guarantee-access-to-justice-da3c0e508171

[5]Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra (2011) (2012) 2 SCC 666.

[6] Ecourtsservices, “ECourts”, https://services.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindia_v6/

[7] The Report of the Law Commission on the Reform of Judicial Administration, 1 Journal of the Indian Law Institute 331 (1959), https://www.jstor.org/stable/43953792

[11] PRACTICE DIRECTIONS FOR E-FILING (PHASE-II) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA https://main.sci.gov.in/php/FAQ/5_6246991526434439183.pdf.

[12] Norul Mohamed Rashid, Access to Justice and Rule of Law Institutions, United Nations and the Rule of Law, https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/thematic-areas/access-to-justice-and-rule-of-law-institutions/

[13] Law Commission of India, Reform of Judicial Administration Report No.14, (September 1958).

[14] UNITED NATIONS STANDARD MINIMUM RULES FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRISONERS RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY(2015).

[1] T.G.Agitha, Trademark Dilution: Indian Approach, Journal of the Indian Law Institute , JULY-SEPTEMBER 2008, Vol. 50, No. 3 (JULY-SEPTEMBER 2008), pp. 339-366.

[2] Gangjee, Dev S., The Polymorphism of Trademark Dilution in India (September 25, 2008). Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 17, 2008.

[3] Graeme W. Austin, Tolerating Confusion about Confusion: Trademark Policies and Fair Use, 50 ARIZ. L. REV. 157 (2008).

[4] Mark P. McKenna, Testing Modern Trademark Law's Theory of Harm, 95 IOWA L. REV. 63 (2009).

[5] Cheng-chi Chang, The Clash of Theories: Semiotic Democracy and Personality Theory in Intellectual Property Law, 26 LAW & WORLD 14 (2023).

[6] Barton Beebe, Search and Persuasion in Trademark Law, 103 MICH. L. REV. 2020 (2005).

[7] Sonia K. Katyal, Between Semiotic Democracy and Disobedience: Two views of Branding, Culture and Intellectual Property, 4 Wipo J. Intell. Prop. 50 (2012)

[8] S.U. Kucuk, Brand Hate, A Semiotic Analysis of Consumer-Generated Antibranding.” Marketing Theory, June 2015, Vol. 15, No. 2, SAGE, pages 243–264.

[9] Ann Bartow, Barbie in Bondage: What Orly Lobel’s Book “You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v. MGA

Entertainment Exposed Barbie’s Dark Side” Tells Us About the Commoditization of the Female Body, 29

Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 435 (2019).

[10] William McGeveran, The Imaginary Trademark Parody Crisis (and the Real One), 90 Wash. L. REV. 713 (2015).

[11] Rita Heimes, Trademarks, Identity, and Justice, 11 J. Marshall REV. INTELL. PROP. L. [i] (2011).

[12] Stacey L. Dogan & Mark A. Lemley, Parody as Brand, 47 U.C.D. L. REV. 473 (2013).

[13] Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Haute Diggity Dog, LLC, 507 F.3d 252, 261 (4th Cir. 2007).

[14] Irina D. Manta, Hedonic Trademarks, 74 OHIO St. L.J. 241 (2013).

[15] David Tan, The Semiotics of Alpha Brands: Encoding/Decoding/Recoding/Transcoding of

Louis Vuitton and Implications for Trademark Laws, 32 CARDOZO Arts & ENT. L.J. 225

(2013).

[16] Mark Bartholomew, Advertising and Social Identity, 58 BUFF. L. REV. 931 (2010).

[17] Tan, David, Cultural (Re)Codings: Copyright, Trademarks and the Right of Publicity (April 1, 2018). NUS Law Working Paper No. 2018/010.

[18] Kucuk, S.U. Exploring the Legality of Consumer Anti-branding Activities in the Digital Age. J Bus Ethics 139, 77–93 (2016).

[19] Kucuk, S. U. (2015). A semiotic analysis of consumer-generated antibranding. Marketing Theory, 15(2), 243-264.

[20] Sonia K. Katyal, Stealth Marketing and Antibranding: The Love that Dare Not Speak Its Name, 58 BUFF. L. REV. 795 (2010).

[21] Matthew Rimmer, The Black Label: Trade Mark Dilution, Culture Jamming and the No Logo Movement, 5 SCRIPTed 70 (2008).

[22] Mattel Inc v Walking Mountain Productions, 353 F.3d 792, 802 (9th Cir. 2003)

[23] Mattel Inc v Walking Mountain Productions, 353 F.3d 792 (9th Cir. 2003).

[24] Mattel Inc v MCA Records Inc, 296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002).

[25] Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Haute Diggity Dog LLC, 507 F.3d 252 (4th Cir. 2007).

[26] Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v My Other Bag Inc., 674 Fed. Appx. 16, No. 16-241-cv (22 Dec 2016).

[27] Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International (Case CCT 42/04) [2005] (27 May 2005), the Constitutional Court of South Africa, [109].

[28] Dustin Marlan, Is the Word "Consumer" Biasing Trademark Law?, 8 TEX. A&M L. REV. 367

(2021)

[29] Laura R. Bradford, Emotion, Dilution, and the Trademark Consumer, 23 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1227 (2008

[30] Mark Bartholomew, Trademark Morality, 55 WM. & MARY L. REV. 85 (2013).

[31] Sonia K. Katyal, Trademark Cosmopolitanism, 47 U.C.D. L. REV. 875 (2014).

[32] Louis Vuitton v My Other Bag (MOB) 156 F. Supp. 3d 425 (2016).

[33] Jeremy N. Sheff, The (Boundedly) Rational Basis of Trademark Liability, 15 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 331 (2007).

[36] ITC LIMITED VS. PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS SA & ORS., 2010 (42) PTC 572 (Del.).

[38] Ford Motor Company & Anr. vs Mrs. C.R.Borman & Anr., 2008 SCC. Online Del 1211

[39] Section 2(1)(zg), The Trade Marks Act, 1999.

[41] Mark D. Janis & Peter K. Yu, International and Comparative Aspects of Trademark Dilution, 17 Transnat'l L.

& Contemp. Probs. 603 (2008

[42] William G. Barber, Barton Beebe, Christine Haight Farley, and Michael Heltzer, Panel II: Trademark Dilution

Revision Act Implications, 16 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1093 (2006).

[43] Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited v. Eros International Media Limited, 2021 SCC OnLine Del 1298 24.

[44] Tata Sons Limited vs Greenpeace International & Anr, I.A. No.9089/2010 in CS (OS) 1407/2010.

[45] Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994, 999 (2d Cir. 1989).

[46] David Tan, The Lost Language of the First Amendment in Copyright Fair Use: A Semiotic Perspective of the Transformative Use Doctrine Twenty-Five Years On, 26 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 311 (2016).

[47] Goyal, Narendra and Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Doctrine of Dilution Under Law of Trademarks - A Comparative Analysis of Law in United Kingdom and United States of America (January 5, 2011).

[48] Michelin & Cie v. CAW, [1997] 2 F.C. 306, 112 (Can. Van.).

[50]Section 30(2)(a), The Trade Marks Act, 1999.

[51] William McGeveran, Rethinking Trademark Fair Use, 94 IOWA L. REV. 49 (2008).

[52] Section 30(2)(d), The Trade Marks Act, 1999.

[53] Consim Info Pvt Ltd v. Google India Private Limited & Ors. [2013 (54) PTC 578 (Mad)]

[54] Article 19, The Constitution of India, 1950.

[1] Harnessing the Power of AI With Women available at: https://onpassive.com/blog/harnessing-the-power-of- ai-with-women/ (Last visited on February 11, 2024)

[2] Harnessing the Digital Age to Empower Women and Girls available at: https://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/guest- articles/harnessing-the-digital-age-to-empower-women-and-girls/ ( Last visited on February 11, 2024)

[3] Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Gender: Bridging the gap available at : http://southernvoice.org/artificial- intelligence-ai-gender-bridging-the-gap/ ( Last visited on February 11, 2024)

[4] Sagar Dnyandev Patil, “Empowerment of Women Through Education and Training in Artificial Intelligence”

IGI Global 1-18 (2022)

[5] Artificial Intelligence: Offering ways to empower women available at: https://aischoolofindia.com/indian- mamas-code/artificial-intelligence-offering-ways-to-empower-women/ (Last visited on February 11, 2024)

[6] AI and Gender Equality available at : https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-editorials/ai-and- gender- equality#:~:text=AI%20systems%20that%20are%20designed,their%20gendered%20names%20and%20voices. ( Last visited on February 11, 2024)

[9] In the eye of the beholder: AI optimism and female empowerment available at : https://mbzuai.ac.ae/news/in- the-eye-of-the-beholder-ai-optimism-and-female-empowerment/ ( Last visited on February 11, 2024)

[11] Artificial Intelligence Supporting The Cause of Gender Equality available at : https://www.smilefoundationindia.org/blog/artificial-intelligence-supporting-the-cause-of-gender-equality/ (Last visited on February 11, 2024)

[1] Sir Jack Beatson and Andrew Burrows and John Cartwright, Anson's Law of Contract (31st edn, Oxford University Press 2010) 299.

[5] R Yashod Vardhan, Chitra Narayan, Pollock & Mulla, The Indian Contract and Specific Relief Acts: Sections 1 to 72 (16th edn, Vol. 1, LexisNexis 2019) 412-457.

[7] TVS Row, D Gupta and PN Kumar, Sanjiva Row’s Commentary on Law Relating to Contract Act, 1872 and Tenders (Act No. IX of 1872): Section 1 to 30 (11^th edn., Delhi Law House 2011) 556-559.

[23] Robert B. Seidman, ‘Contract Law, the Free Market, and State Intervention: A Jurisprudential Perspective,’ (1973) 4(7) Journal of Economic Issues 553-575.

[27] Bix, Brian H., ‘Theories of contract law’ [2017] 7 Edward Elgar Publishing 11-12.

[29] Lewis Klar, ‘Duty of Care for Negligent Misrepresentation - and beyond,’ (2018) Advocates' Quarterly 48, no. 3: 235-252.

[1] Body of law created by judges and quasi-judicial authorities, creating precedents

[2] Conveys that he who does an act through another is considered to have done that act by himself

[1] Saha, Mitrajit & Banerjee, Sayantani & Chakraborty, Sayak & Biswas, Debasmita. (2023). ROLE OF THE ‘DIGITAL INDIA’ PROGRAMME IN THE RURAL CONTEXT: A STUDY AT MAUTALA VILLAGE IN WEST BENGAL, INDIA. International Journal of Current Research. 15. 24299-24303. 10.24941/ijcr.45021.04.2023.

[2] https://www.ccdriver-h2020.com/post/a-cybercrime-typology

[3] https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/security/what-is-social-engineering.html

[4] https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2020/11/03/cyberattacks-just-how-sophisticated-have-they-become/?sh=1c3c4cfd4c3e

[5] https://www.mediadefence.org/ereader/publications/advanced-modules-on-digital-rights-and-freedom-of-expression-online/module-4-privacy-and-security-online/encryption-and-anonymity-on-the-internet/#:~:text=Over%20time%2C%20vulnerabilities%20may%20be,the%20lifetime%20of%20the%20data.

[6] https://www.fortinet.com/blog/industry-trends/combating-cybercrime-collaboration

[7] https://projects.itforchange.net/e-vaw/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Molly_Ghosh.pdf

[8] https://chandannagarpolice.wb.gov.in/index.php/Cpc/cyber_cell

[9] https://www.forbes.com/sites/glebtsipursky/2023/04/08/10-steps-for-strategic-planning-to-defend-your-future/?sh=19bf47c413c8

[10] https://cybertalents.com/blog/cyber-crime-investigation

[11] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/3-1-cybercrime-conviction-in-west-bengal-in-2019-21-report/articleshow/100059470.cms

[12] https://financesonline.com/cybercrime-trends/#:~:text=With%20the%20advent%20of%20IoT,the%20risk%20of%20getting%20hacked.

[4] Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), Ninth Edition, Revision 07.2022, Published February 2023, available at https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/index.html

[5] “Guidelines for Examination of Biotechnology Applications for Patent”, Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, March 2013

[7] Monsanto Technology LLC v. Controller of Patents and Designs (2022)

[8] Dimminaco A.G. v. Controller of Patents and Designs, (2002) I.P.L.R. 255 (Cal)

[9] Assoc. for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013)

[10] Debashish Banerjee and Pankaj Musyuni, “Biotechnological inventions in India: law, practice and challenges”, Published on 23 October 2015, IAM, available at https://www.iam-media.com/global-guide/iam-yearbook/2016/article/biotechnological-inventions-in-india-law-practice-and-challenges

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

USE OF ONLINE PLATFORM FOR ILLEGAL SELLING AND GAMBLING BY - MS. ANANYA GOYAL & DR. JYOTI DHARM

CONTRA PROFERENTEM: AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF IT’S HISTORICAL EVOLUTION, PRINCIPLES, AND IMPACT ON INDIAN CONTRACT LAW BY - GULNAR ARORA

ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY TO GUARANTEE ACCESS TO JUSTICE BY - PUSHPITA MITRA

A COMPARATIVE DOCTRINAL STUDY OF TRADEMARK DILUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF SEMIOTIC DISOBEDIENCE BY - BARKHA SINGH

HARNESSING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR WOMEN EMPOWERMENT: A CATALYST FOR SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRESS BY: ADV. BHUMI TANDON

SILENCE SPEAKS VOLUMES: DO WE NEED TO INTRODUCE A GENERAL DUTY OF DISCLOSURE? BY - RUDRA SINSINWAR

TRACING ORIGINS OF DOCTRINE OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY BY - HARIHAR JAGANNATH

IMPORTANCE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE IN ANCIENT AND MODERN TIMES CONCERNING MODERN TECHNIQUES IN CONDUCTING THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS BY: PROF.(DR.) S. JAMES & RENUBALA WAHENGBAM

CYBER CRIMES IN WEST BENGAL AND THE CHALLENGES AHEAD CONCERNING & THE ROLE OF CYBER CRIMES INVESTIGATION CELL (CCLC) KOLKATA FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CYBER CRIME SUSPECTS BY - PRITHWISH GANGULI & PROF DR S. JAMES

BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTING, DIFFERENCE BETWEEN USA AND INDIAN PERSPECTIVE BY: MAYURI HANSDA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2