INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

EXECUTION OF DECREE UNDER THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1908: ARREST, DETENTION, RELEASE AND SEIZURE BY - ALIND GUPTA

Authors : ALIND GUPTA

Registration ID : 106518 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6518

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : alindgpt@yahoo.co.in

Page No :16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND OVERREACH BY - YOGYA SHARMA

Authors : YOGYA SHARMA

Registration ID : 106517 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6517

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : yogya.s10@gmail.com

Page No :17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION: A BANE OR BOON TO THE WORLD ECONOMY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT BY - DR. UDAI PRATAP SINGH MS. ANUPRIYA R. PRASAD

Authors : DR. UDAI PRATAP SINGH MS. ANUPRIYA R. PRASAD

Registration ID : 106515 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6515 & IJLRA6516

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : judaip.singh@ddn.upes.ac.in

Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

THE NEED FOR AN UPGRADED EMPHASIS ON AN INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL LAWFARE STRATEGY BY INDIA: A NOD FOR/ AGAINST AN IMPACTFUL CHANGE? BY - JOHN MARIADAS

Authors : JOHN MARIADAS

Registration ID : 106514 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6514

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : john.mariadas@law.christuniversity.in

Page No :13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGES AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: A STUDY OF THE INDIAN SCENARIO BY - KALYANI RAVINDRA YADAV

Authors : KALYANI RAVINDRA YADAV

Registration ID : 106513 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6513

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : kalyaniyadav3748@gmail.com

Page No :16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

ETHICAL AND MORAL IMPLICATIONS OF GENETIC ENGINEERING: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS BY - KALYANI RAVINDRA YADAV

Authors : KALYANI RAVINDRA YADAV

Registration ID : 106512 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6512

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : kalyaniyadav3748@gmail.com

Page No :21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

ROLLING THE DICE ON LEGAL BOUNDARIES: A CASE COMMENATRY ON GHERULAL PAREKH V MAHADEODAS MAIYA BY - SUMEDHA PRADHAN & SANCHITA SINGH

Authors : SUMEDHA PRADHAN & SANCHITA SINGH

Registration ID : 106510 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6510 & IJLRA6511

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : psumedha825@gmail.com & sanchisingh785@gmail.com

Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAWS GOVERNING INDIA BY - RESHMA RT

Authors : RESHMA RT

Registration ID : 106509 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6509

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : reshmabluffy@gmail.com

Page No :14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

AGENCY COST THEORY BY - BHAVYA PATHANIA & SPARSH SAXENA

Authors : BHAVYA PATHANIA & SPARSH SAXENA

Registration ID : 106507 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6507 & IJLRA6508

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : 21jgls-ssaxena@jgu.edu.in & 21jgls-bpathania@jgu.edu.in

Page No :19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE BY - AKSHAT DEV & HIMANSHU SINGH

Authors : JAKSHAT DEV & HIMANSHU SINGH

Registration ID : 106505 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6505 & IJLRA6506

Year : Dec-2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : akshatdev1090@gmail.com & himanshu.singh23@nludelhi.ac.in

Page No :23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] CK Thakker, Civil Procedure (6^th edn, Eastern Book Company 2011) 587.

[2] Halsbury’s Laws of England (vol17, 4^th edn, 2009) 232.

[5] CK Thakker, Civil Procedure (8^th edn, Eastern Book Company 2017) 603.

[6] Halsbury’s Laws of England (4^th edn, 2009) vol17, 232.

[9] Punjab State Electricity Board v Ramesh Kumar Gupta (2009) 16 SCC 307.

[12] Law Commission of India, Reforms of Judicial Administration (14^th report, 1958) 431< http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/1-50/Report14Vol1.pdf> accessed on 20 November 2018.

[14] Law Commission of India, Civil Procedure Code 1908 (54^th report, 1973) 72-92 < http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/51-100/Report54.pdf> accessed on 20 November 2018; Law Commission of India, Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (27^th report, 1964) 174-210 < http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/1-50/Report27.pdf> accessed on 20 November 2018.

[17] Mahadeo Prasad Singh v Ram Lochan (1980) 4 SCC 354.

[25] Santanu Dey, ‘Legal Provisions of Section 51 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908, (C.P.C.), India – Procedure in Execution’ (Share Your Essays) <http://www.shareyouressays.com/knowledge/legal-provisions-of-section-51-of-code-of-civil-procedure-1908-c-p-c-india-procedure-in-execution/114388> accessed on 20 November 2018.

[28] Anoop Koneeri, ‘Supreme Court rejects Subrata Roy’s plea against his detention’ (Live Law, May 2014) < https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court-rejects-subrata-roys-plea-detention/> accessed on 20 November 2018.

[30] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Art 11.

[31] Harpreet Kaur, ‘Arrest and detention under civil law’ < https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/arrest-and-detention-under-civil-law/> accessed on 20 November 2018.

[32] Bhagwandas Agrawal v Shriram Govinda 1979 SCCOnLine Bom 94.

[34] PG Rangnatha v Mayavaram Financial Corporation AIR 1974 Mad 1.

[36] MP Jain, The Code of Civil Procedure (3^rd edn, 2011) 232.

[37] Doraswamy Reddy v. Kodananda Naidu (1997) 2 AP LJ 107 (SN).

[41] S Mohan v Rani Ammal 2010 SCC OnLine Mad 2129.

[42] Black’s Law Dictionary (2^nd edn) < https://dictionary.thelaw.com/seizure/> accessed 20 November 2018.

[46] Shyam Singh v Collector, Hamirpur 1993 Supp (1) SCC 693.

[47] Rahul Shah v Jinendra Kumar Gandhi 2021 SCC OnLine SC 341.

[48] Jolly George v Bank of Cochin AIR 1980 SC 470.

[1] Khosla, S. (2013). Human Rights and Judicial Activism in India. GUIDELINES TO CONTRIBUTORS, 154.

[2] Shukla, S. (2018). Judicial Overreach: The Role of the Judiciary in Contemporary India. Anish Kumar Verma, 25.

[3] Gauri, V. (2009). Public interest litigation in India: overreaching or underachieving? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (5109).

[6] Jain, A. G., & Rosencranz, A. (2014). The Indian Supreme Court Promotes Interlinking of India's Rivers: Judicial Overreach. Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis, 44, 10348.

[7] Avishek Goenka vs. Union of India, (2012) 5 SCC 321

[8] In Re: Ramlila Maidan Incident (2012) 5 SCC 1, 2012 AIR SCW 3660

[9] Ahmed, H. (2016). ‘The concept of Public Interest Litigation lies at the root of judicial activism in India. ‘Elaborate with suitable examples.

[10] Satapathy, A., & Satapathy, S. Judicial Overreach Under The Garb Of Judicial Activism: Where Did We Go Wrong?.

[11] Upendra Baxi, ?The Avatars of Indian Judicial Activism: Explorations in the Geographies of (in) Justice in S.K.Verma and Kusum, Fifty Years of Supreme Court of India – Its Grasp and Reach 173 (2000).

[14] Keshavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461

[18] Rahman, M. M., & Badhon, R. Z. (2018). A Critical Analysis on Judicial Activism and Overreach.

[19] Jain, N. (2010). Judicial Power: From Judicial Review to Judicial Overreach. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 56(2), 331-342.

[20] Speaking at the Conference of Chief Ministers and Chief Justices held in New Delhi in Apr 08, 2007.

[21] Bhasin, K. (2018). Environmental Governance in India: An inefficient outcome due to lack of “specialized” and strong institution?.

[22] Shyam Narayan Chouksey v. Union of India (2017) 1 SCC 42

[23] S. P. Sathe, Judicial Activism: The Indian Experience (2001) 6 Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 29.

[1] Assistant Professor (Senior Scale), School of Law, UPES, Dehradun.

[2] Student, LLM, School of Law, UPES, Dehradun.

[1] Akhil Oka, ‘India acts tough amid LAC faceoff, to ban 54 Chinese apps over threat to national security’, Republic World (New Delhi, 14 Feb 2020) A1.

[2] Kiritka Suneja, ‘China accuses India of discriminatory trade measures during a meeting at the WTO’, Economic Times (New Delhi, 04 Oct 2020) C3.

[3] Ryan Sean, ‘Under-Mining Public Trust: The Rhetoric of Lawfare’ (2017) 4(88) Australian Quarterly 43.

[4] Arindrajit Basu, Gurshabad Grover, ‘India needs a digital lawfare strategy to counter China’, The Diplomat (Beijing, 08 October 2020) C2.

[5] Luban David, ‘Lawfare and legal ethics in Guantanamo’, (2008) 6(60) Stanford Law Review 1986.

[6] Arindrajit Basu, ‘Extraterritorial algorithmic surveillance and the incapacitation of international human rights law’ (2019) 12(189) NUJS Law Review 190.

[7] Winckler, H., Godement, F., & Kratz, A., ‘China: Waging ‘lawfare’ on NGOs’ (2015) 1(22) European Council on Foreign Relations 33.

[8] Ryan Sean, ‘Under-Mining Public Trust: The Rhetoric of Lawfare’ (2017) 4(88) Australian Quarterly 43.

[9] The Steering Committee, GoI, ‘Making India 5G ready’ (Report of 5G High Level Forum 23 August 2018) <https://dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/5G%20Steering%20Committee%20report%20v%2026_0.pdf?download=1> accessed on 15 Aug 2022.

[10] Frederick, Kara, ‘The New War of Ideas: Counterterrorism Lessons for the Digital Disinformation Fight’ (2019) 8 (19) Center for a New American Security 33.

[11] Burwell F G, Propp K, ‘The European Union and the Search for Digital Sovereignty: Building ‘Fortress Europe’ or Preparing for a New World?’ (2020) 5(19) Atlantic Council 89.

[12] Brandão, C., ‘Lawfare (or, simply, War)’ (2018) 9(32) CLACSO 35.

[13] Maxwell, Neville, ‘Sino-India Dispute: A variant view’ (2000) 2(4) The Journal of International Issues 150.

[14] Amit Bhandari, Blaise Fernandez, Aashna Agarwal, ‘Chinese Investments in India’ (Gateway House Report No. 3 07 Feb 2020) <https://www.gatewayhouse.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Chinese-Investments-in-India-Report_2020_Final.pdf> accessed on 15 Aug 2022.

[15] Wallace, D., & Visger, M, ‘Responding to the Call for a Digital Geneva Convention: An Open Letter to Brad Smith and the Technology Community’ (2018) 6(2) Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare 54.

[16] Ünver, H. Ak?n, ‘Politics of Digital Surveillance, National Security and Privacy’ (2018) 1(1) Centre for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies 32.

[17]The Transatlantic Digital Dialogue, ‘Extraterritorial Access to Data’ (2015) 3(56) German Marshall Fund of the United States 12.

[1] https://www.studyiq.com/articles/parliamentary-privileges/

[2] https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/the-privileges-of-members-of-parliament ³ n Analysis of the Interplay between Parliamentary Privileges and Fundamental Rights" by Kishlay Pandey, published in the NALSAR Student Law Review in 2017.

[3] "The Constitution of India: A Contextual Analysis" by Arun K. Thiruvengadam and "Parliamentary Privileges in India" by M.P. Jain and S.N. Jain

[4] n Analysis of the Interplay between Parliamentary Privileges and Fundamental Rights" by Kishlay Pandey, published in the NALSAR Student Law Review in 2017.

[5] Parliamentary Privileges and the Fundamental Rights of Citizens: A Delicate Balance" by Nishtha Chopra, published in the Indian Law Journal in 2019

[6] "The Constitution of India: A Contextual Analysis" by Arun K. Thiruvengadam and "Parliamentary Privileges in India" by M.P. Jain and S.N. Jain

[7] Supreme Court and High Court judgments and orders on conflicts between parliamentary privileges and fundamental rights in India, Keshav Singh's case (1965), Raja Ram Pal's case (2007), and Subramanian Swamy's case (2016)

[8] udicial Review and Parliamentary Privileges: The Case of India" by Philip A. Thomas, published in the Journal of Legislative Studies in 2010

[9] The Balancing Act: Parliamentary Privileges and Fundamental Rights in India" by J. Sai Deepak, published in the Economic and Political Weekly in 2018

[10] "The Constitution of India: A Contextual Analysis" by Arun K. Thiruvengadam and "Parliamentary Privileges in India" by M.P. Jain and S.N. Jain

[1] Bioethics: An Introduction" by Marianne Talbot

[2] "The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future" by Sheila Jasanoff

[3] "Genetics: Ethics, Law, and Policy" by Lori B. Andrews

[4] "Genetics: Ethics, Law, and Policy" by Lori B. Andrews

[5] "Genetics: Ethics, Law, and Policy" by Lori B. Andrews

[6] "The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future" by Sheila Jasanoff

[7] Bioethics: An Introduction" by Marianne Talbot

[8] "The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future" by Sheila Jasanoff

[9] "Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases" by Lewis Vaughn

[10] "The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future" by Sheila Jasanoff

[11] Bioethics: An Introduction" by Marianne Talbot

[12] "The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future" by Sheila Jasanoff

[13] "Genetics: Ethics, Law, and Policy" by Lori B. Andrews

[14] Bioethics: An Introduction" by Marianne Talbot

[15] "Genetics: Ethics, Law, and Policy" by Lori B. Andrews

[16] "The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future" by Sheila Jasanoff

[17] "The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future" by Sheila Jasanoff

[18] "Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases" by Lewis Vaughn

[19] "Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases" by Lewis Vaughn

[20] "The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future" by Sheila Jasanoff

[22] Bioethics: An Introduction" by Marianne Talbot

[23] Bioethics: An Introduction" by Marianne Talbot

[1] The authors are first-year students at National Law University, Odisha

[4] “Gherulal Parekh v Mahadeodas Maiya AIR 1959 SC 781” (One stop destination for DULLB students), available at https://dullbonline.wordpress.com/2020/11/02/gherulal-parakh-v-mahadeodas-maiya-air-1959-sc-781-2/ (last visited on 12 September 2023)

^{^[3]} Ktaer Abbas Habib Al Qutaifi vs. Union of India 1999 CriLJ 1919

^{^[4]} Malavika Karelkar vs. Union of India Writ Petition (Criminal No) 583 of 1992.

^{^[5]} P. Nedumaran vs. UOI, 1993(2) ALT 291, 1993 (2) ALT Cri 188.

^{^[6]} Mohammad Salimullah and others vs. Union of India and Ors. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 793/2017.

[1] Avtar Singh, Law of Contract and Specific Relief 733.

[2] Syed Abdul Khader v. Rami Reddy, 2 SCC 601 (1979).

[4] Avtar Singh, Law of Contract and Specific Relief 739.

[5] Performing Right Society Ltd v. Mitchell & Booker (Palais de Donse) Ltd, 1 KB 762 (1924).

[7] Chairman, L.I.C. Of India And Ors v. Rajeev Kumar Bhaskar, ACJ 86 (2003).

[8] Harshad J. Shah and Anr v. L.I.C. of India and Ors, 5 SCC 64 (1997).

[9] Narandas Morardas Gaziwala & Ors v. S. P. Am. Papammal& Anr, SCR 38 (1966).

[12] Krishna Chandra Ganpati v. K. Hanumantha Rao, 241 AIR (Ori 1950).

[15] JJayabharathi Corporation v. Sv. P.N. Sn. Rajesekara Nadar, AIR 596 (SC 1992).

[1] She is an American children’s right activist. She influenced Martin Luther King Jr.. She founded Children’s Defence Fund in Washington, D.C. She was also held the directorship of Harvard University’s Centre for Law and Education.

[2] Neil Hibbert, 'Human Rights and Social Justice' (2017) 6 Laws 1.

[3] Marcus Einfeld, 'Human Rights and Social Justice in Australian Society' (2003) 2003 Austl Int'l LJ 10.

[4] Michael Goodhart, Human Rights: Politics and Practice (3rd edn Oxford University Press 2016).

[5] John T. Jost and Aaron C. Kay ‘Social justice: History, theory, and research’ in S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 1122.

[9] John Rawls, A theory of Justice (Belknap Press 1971).

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

EXECUTION OF DECREE UNDER THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1908: ARREST, DETENTION, RELEASE AND SEIZURE BY - ALIND GUPTA

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND OVERREACH BY - YOGYA SHARMA

INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION: A BANE OR BOON TO THE WORLD ECONOMY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT BY - DR. UDAI PRATAP SINGH MS. ANUPRIYA R. PRASAD

THE NEED FOR AN UPGRADED EMPHASIS ON AN INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL LAWFARE STRATEGY BY INDIA: A NOD FOR/ AGAINST AN IMPACTFUL CHANGE? BY - JOHN MARIADAS

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGES AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: A STUDY OF THE INDIAN SCENARIO BY - KALYANI RAVINDRA YADAV

ETHICAL AND MORAL IMPLICATIONS OF GENETIC ENGINEERING: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS BY - KALYANI RAVINDRA YADAV

ROLLING THE DICE ON LEGAL BOUNDARIES: A CASE COMMENATRY ON GHERULAL PAREKH V MAHADEODAS MAIYA BY - SUMEDHA PRADHAN & SANCHITA SINGH

INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAWS GOVERNING INDIA BY - RESHMA RT

AGENCY COST THEORY BY - BHAVYA PATHANIA & SPARSH SAXENA

HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE BY - AKSHAT DEV & HIMANSHU SINGH

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2