• +91 7042148991
  • editor@ijlra.com
IJLRA Logo
  • Home
  • Ethics & Policy
    • Duties Of Authors
    • Editors Responsibilities
    • Reviewers Responsibilities
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright Policy
  • For Authors
    • About Us
    • Call for Paper
    • Verify Certificate
    • Track Paper
    • Copyright Form
    • How to Publish Paper
  • Issue
    • Past Issue
    • VOLUME 1
      • ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 7
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 5
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 6
    • VOLUME 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 5
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 6
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME II ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUIE 1
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 8
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 10
    • VOLUME 3
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 2
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 3
  • Editorial Board
  • Verify Certificate
  • Submit Paper
IJLRA Logo
  • Home
  • Ethics & Policy
    • Duties Of Authors
    • Editors Responsibilities
    • Reviewers Responsibilities
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright Policy
  • For Authors
    • About Us
    • Call for Paper
    • Verify Certificate
    • Track Paper
    • Copyright Form
    • How to Publish Paper
  • Issue
    • Past Issue
    • VOLUME 1
      • ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 7
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 5
      • VOLUME 1 ISSUIE 6
    • VOLUME 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 5
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 6
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME II ISSUE 7
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUIE 1
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 8
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 9
      • VOLUME 2 ISSUE 10
    • VOLUME 3
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 2
      • VOLUME 3 ISSUIE 3
  • Editorial Board
  • Verify Certificate
  • Submit Paper

AN OVERVIEW OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE IN INDIA BY - POORVA CHAWLA

Authors: POORVA CHAWLA
Registration ID: 101976 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1976
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: ankit.sh0990@gmail.com
Page No :12 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY V. CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY BY - TEJAS JOSHI

Authors: TEJAS JOSHI
Registration ID: 101975 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1975
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: tejas14402@gmail.com
Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF BANKING OMBUDSMAN IN CUSTOMER GRIEVANCE REDRESS - INDIAN SCENARIO BY - DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANE

Authors:  DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANE
Registration ID: 101974 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1974
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: drdprane@gmail.com
Page No :13 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 

  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS TO WIVES, CHILDREN, AND PARENTS IN INDIA: A STUDY THROUGH LANDMARK CASES BY - MEEMANSHA DAYAL

Authors: MEEMANSHA DAYAL
Registration ID: 101973 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1973
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: meemanshadayal@gmail.com
Page No :13 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

“HINDU ORIGIN AND PERSPECTIVE: INDIAN CONTEXT” BY - DR. PUSHPA MEHDOO

Authors: DR. PUSHPA MEHDOO
Registration ID: 101972 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1972
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: adv.rajendra1990@gmail.com
Page No :19 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

PLEA BARGAINING: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS FUNCTION, IMPACT, AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS. BY: - SAKSHI MISHRA

Authors: SAKSHI MISHRA 
Registration ID: 101971 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1971
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: sakshimishra527@gmail.com
Page No :23 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

LEGAL ASPECTS OF ANIMAL TESTING UNDER CLINICAL TRIALS BY - AISHWARYA PRABHU

Authors: AISHWARYA PRABHU
Registration ID: 101970 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1970
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: aishwaryaprabhu14@gmail.com
Page No :14 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

DWARKINS THEORY OF MORAL INTEGRITY OF LAW BY - PARASA TANMAYEE

Authors: PARASA TANMAYEE
Registration ID: 101969 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1969
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: tanmayee.parasa@dsnlu.ac.in
Page No :17 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

RULE OF LAW: A DETAILED ANALYSIS BY - HIMANSHU

Authors: HIMANSHU
Registration ID: 101968 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1968
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: HIMANSHU.SHARMA9519@GMAIL.COM
Page No :16 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google

PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE BY - DR. NAMRATA GUPTA

Authors: DR. NAMRATA GUPTA
Registration ID: 101967 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1967
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: namrata.allu@gmail.com
Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: 
  • Share on:
  • Citation
  • Download
  • Full Details
  • Search on Google
« Previous Next »

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

Ethics and Policy

  • Duties of Authors
  • Editors Responsibilities
  • Reviewrs Responsibilities
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Copyright Policy

For Authors

  • About us
  • Call for paper
  • Verify Certificate
  • Copyright Form
  • How to Publish Paper
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact us

Citation

Citation


[1] Vice President Secretariat Press Release, Link- https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1890297
[2] The Hindu Daily, Feb. 3,2023, Link- https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parliament-is-the-north-star-of-democracy-vice-president/article66467335.ece
[3] United Kingdom Parliament, Official website.
[4]  A V Dicey, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (first published 1885), 10th ed., 1959, London: Macmillan, pp 39–40
[5] ibid. 4
[6] Sovereignty, Supremacy and the Origins of the English Civil War, D Alan Orr, Introduction.
[7] 1 Will & Marr Sess 2 c 2, Citation.
[8] The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution, Jutta Limbach, Pg. 1
[9] United States Constitution, created Sept. 17, 1787
[10] Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982
[11] Link- https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/text-31-40#s-lg-box-wrapper-25493387
[12] The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty by T.R.S. Allen, Oxford University Press.
[13] Act of Settlement of 1700, citation- 12 and 13 Will 3 c. 2
[14] Origins in various Indian, Greek, and Roman documents. Also propounded in Magna Carta
[15] 77 Eng. Rep. 638, Thomas Bonham v College of Physicians
[16] Pollard, David (2007) ISBN:978-0-19-928637-9.

[17] California Law Review, Courts and the Executive in Wartime: A Comparative Study of the American and British Approaches to the Internment of Citizens during World War II and Their Lessons for Today, Amanda L. Tyler, dated June 2019

[18] [1964] AC 40
[19] Judicial Review & Parliamentary Supremacy by David Collins, Duke University.
[20] 1998 c. 42, Passed as envisaged by EU Convention on Human Rights.
[21] Section 4 and 10 of Human Rights Act, 1998
[22] The Super The Supervisory Power of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court by Amy Coney Barrett, Notre Dame Law School.
[23] 5 U.S. 137, United States Supreme Court
[24] As incoming President Jefferson was his political rival.
[25] A practice that is used even today.
[26] A Preference for Deference? The Supreme Court and Judicial Review by Robert M. Howard and Jeffrey A. Segal, Political Research Quarterly Vol. 57
[27] 347 U.S. 483, United States Supreme Court.
[28] 576 U.S. 644, United States Supreme Court.
[29] Report, Department of Legal Affairs Of India, Link- https://legalaffairs.gov.in/sites/default/files/chapter%207.pdf
[30] PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY VS. JUDICIAL SUPREMACY IN INDIA by D. C. Chauhan, The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol.74
[31] First Phase from 1947 to 1967
[32] Ibid.,30
[33] Ibid.,30
[34] Ibid.,30
[35] Minerva Mills v UOI, AIR 1980 SC 1789, Supreme Court of India.
[36] Ibid.,30
[37] Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, 1967 AIR 1643, Supreme Court of India.
[38] Anti- Corruption Litigation In Supreme Court of India by Arghya Sengupta,2006
[39] 99th Constitutional Amendment Act,2014
[40] K.S. Puttaswamy v UOI, (2017) 10 SCC 1, Supreme Court of India

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation


[1] Introduction to Clinical Trials – What are they? What Happens? Who is Involved? https://genesisresearchservices.com/introduction-to-clinical-trials-what-are-they-what-happens-who-is-involved/, last seen on 02/12/2022.
[2] About Animal testing, Humane Society International, https://www.hsi.org/news-media/about/.
[3] Pikee Saxena and Rohit Saxena, Clinical trials: Changing Regulations in India, National Library of Medicine, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215498/, last seen on 02/12/2022.
[4] S. Bhambri & Associates, https://www.sbhambriadvocates.com/post/a-critical-study-on-clinical-trials-and-rights-of-animals, last seen 02/12/2022.
[5] Safety Testing, Science, Medicine, and Animals, National Academic Press, Washington, DC, https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/10733/chapter/10.
[6]By Beonchip, Animal-free testig, History of animal experimentation and animal rights, Jun 8, 2021, https://beonchip.com/animal-rights-history, last seen on 03/12/2022.
[7] Experimentation of cosmetics and household products, Animals Ethics, https://www.animal-ethics.org/experimentation-cosmetics-household-products/, last seen on 03/12/2022.
[8] Draft Prevention of Cruelty to Animal (Amendment) Bill-2022, 24 Nov 2022, https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/draft-prevention-of-cruelty-to-animal-amendment-bill 2022#:~:text=Recently%2C%20the%20Government%20has%20introduced,Fisheries%2C%20Animal%20Husbandry%20and%20Dairying. last seen on 03/12/2022.
[9] Draft for amendment to Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act ready, public comments sought: 3-year jail for gruesome cruelty, 5 for killing, Updated on November 24, 2022, The Free Press Journal, https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/draft-for-amendment-to-prevention-of-cruelty-to-animal-act-ready-public-comments-sought-3-year-jail-for-gruesome-cruelty-5-for-killing , last seen on 03/12/2022.
[10]Animals are not ours, Peta, https://www.peta.org/about-peta/learn-about-peta/, last seen on 03/12/2022.
[11] Cosmetics Testing Ban on Animals Now Permanent, May 24,2014, Peta, https://www.petaindia.com/blog/cosmetics-testing-banned-on-animals/.
[12] Regarding CPCSEA Guidelines, Chapter on Animal Welfare, https://www.pci.nic.in/pdf/15.pdf.
[13]Ambika Hiranandani,  Animal rights: Legislation is not enough, September 3, 2019, idr, https://idronline.org/animal-rights-legislation-is-not-enough/.
[14] History of Animal Testing in new PETA Exhibit, ‘Without Consent’, PETA, https://withoutconsent.peta.org/, last seen on 03/12/2022.
[15] https://indiankanoon.org/doc/159107874/.
[16] Kakoli8 Nath, Landmark Cases and Laws, Finology Blog, https://blog.finology.in/Legal-news/animal-rights-india, last seen on 03/12/2022.
[17] https://indiankanoon.org/doc/39696860/
[18] Jis John Sebastian, Protection of Animals: Important Laws in India, last updated on September 24, 2022, ClearIAS, https://www.clearias.com/protection-of-animals/.
[19] https://indiankanoon.org/doc/295123/.

Citation


[1] Jonathan Crowe, Dworkin on the value of integrity, 96 31 (2004).
[2] Id.
[3] Albert Calsamiglia, Dworkin and the Focus on Integrity, 80 Arch. Philos. Law Soc. Philos. 52 (1994).
[4] Crowe, supra note 1.
[5] John Elkington, Integrity and universality?:A comment on Ronald Dworkin’s Freedom Laws, 65 Fordham Law Rev. (1997).
[6] Andrei Marmor, Integrity in Law’s empire, 422 (2019).
[7] Raymond Wacks, Dworkin and moral integrity of law , in Understanding jurisprudence An introduction to legal theory  118 (3 ed. 2012).
[8] Id.
[9] Id.
[10] John D. Inazu, The limits of integrity, 75 law Contemp. 181 (2012).
[11] Raymond Wacks, supra note 7.

Citation

[1] 5 US (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
[2] (1973) 4 SCC 225
[3] 1975 AIR 865
[4] 1961 AIR 221
[5] AIR 1980 SC 89 
[6] 61990 AIR 11 
[7] 1976 AIR 1207
[8] AIR 1983 SC 339
[9] 1989 AIR 1933
[10] 1969 AIR 33
[11] 1967 AIR 1427
[12] AIR 1994 SC 268
[13] AIR 2006 SC 18 

Citation

[1] David Takacs, ‘THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE, ENVIRONMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS, AND THE FUTURE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY’ [2008].
[2] Mark Dowie, In Law We Trust [2005].
[3] Arnold v. Mundy  [1821], 6 N.J.L. 1.
[4] Illinois Central Railroad vs. Illinois [1892], 146 US 387.
[5] Joseph L. Sax, ‘The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention’ [1970].
[6]  M.S. Vani, Community Engagement in Water Governance in Water And The Laws In India,
167, 188 (2009).
[7] Id.,209.
[8]  T.N. Narasimhan, Water Law for India: Science and Philosophy Perspectives in Water And
The Laws In India 535, 555 (1st ed., 2009).
[9] Kamala Sankaran, Water in India: Constitutional Perspectives in Water And The Laws In
India, 17, 24.
[10] Id., 24
[11] David Takacs, The Public Trust Doctrine, Environmental Human Rights and the Future of Private Property,717 New York University Environmental Law Journal(2008)
[12] Joseph L. Sax, The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention,68 Michigan Law Rev. 477 (1970).
[13] Indian Constitution 1950, Article 48A.
[14] Rural Litig. & Entitlement Kendra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, A.I.R. 1985 S.C. 652, 656.
[15] Attakoya Thangal vs Union of India, A.I.R. 1990 K.L.T. 580.
[16] M.C Mehta vs Kamalnath [1997], 1 S.C.C. 388.
 
[17] 18 M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, (1997) 1 SCC 388.
 19 Id.
 20 Id.
 21 Id
[18] M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu [1999], S.C.C. 464.
[19] Shailesh R. Shah v. State of Gujarat, 2002 SCC OnLine Guj 164 : (2002) 43 (3) GLR 2295.
[20] 22 M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, (1999) 6 SCC 464.
 23 Fomento Resorts & Hotels Ltd. v. Minguel Martins, (2009) 3 SCC 571.
 24 Id.,32.
25 Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. v. Reliance Industries Ltd., (2010) 7 SCC 1. 26 The Constitution of India, Art. 297 (‘Things of value within territorial waters or continental shelf and resources of the exclusive economic zone to vest in the Union’. In the given case Art. 297 (1) was interpreted which states that. “(1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive economic zone, of India shall vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.” Here ‘vest in the Union’ was interpreted to mean that the Central Government held the natural resources as a trustee on behalf of the people at large and the right and responsibilities of such trusteeship could not be abdicated in favour of private corporate interests)
 
[21] 27 Shailesh R. Shah v. State of Gujarat, 2002 SCC OnLine Guj 164 : (2002) 43 (3) GLR 2295.
28 B.M.Gandhi, Equity, Trusts And Specific Relief13, 208-209 (2001).
29 Ramaswamy R. Iyer, Why a National Water Framework Law, The Hindu (Chennai) January 7, 2013.
30 Id. 31 Planning Commission, The Draft National Water Framework Act, available at http://www. planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp12/wr/wg_wtr_frame.pdf (Last visited on August 15, 2015). 32 Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, Report of the Committee for the Drafting of National Water Framework Law, 2013, available at http://www.indiaenvironmentportal. org.in/files/file/national%20water%20framework%20law.pdf (Last visited on August 15, 2015). 33 The Constitution of India, Schedule VII, List II, Entry 17. 34 The Constitution of India, Schedule VII, List I, Entry 5. 35 The Constitution of India, Art. 252(1) (‘Power of Parliament to legislate for two or more States by consent and adoption of such legislation by any other State’ states that ‘(1) I it appears to the Legislatures of two or more States to be desirable that any of the matters with respect to which Parliament has no power to make laws or the States except as provided in Articles 249 and 250 should be regulated in such States by Parliament by law, and if resolutions to that effect are passed by all the House of the Legislatures of those States, it shall be lawful for Parliament to pass an Act for regulating that matter accordingly, and any Act so passed shall apply to such States and to any other State by which it is adopted afterwards by resolution passed in that behalf by the House or, where there are two Houses by each of the Houses o the Legislature of that State). 36 The Alagh Bill, 2016, §1(2); The Iyer Bill, 2013, Part 2.
[22] David Takacs, The Public Trust Doctrine, Environmental Human Rights and the Future of
Private Property,717 New York University Environmental Law Journal(2008)
39 The Iyer Bill, 2013, Part 2 (“Common property resource” means a resource owned in common by a village or group or community, as distinguished from private ownership or ownership by the state). 40 The Alagh Bill, 2016, §2(xxiv); The Iyer Bill, 2013, Part 2
The Iyer Bill, 2013, Part 5

Citation 2

65876451 adaskdjlkh lkhlkhasd

IJLRA N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)
  • +91-7042148991
  • editor@ijlra.com

LAW JOURNAL

  • About Us
  • Verify certificate
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us

IMPORTANT LINKS

  • Call for paper
  • How to Publish Paper
  • Submit Paper
  • Track your Paper Status
  • Search Issue

ETHICS & POLICY

  • Duties Of Authors
  • Editors Responsibilities
  • Reviewrs Responsibilities

© 2022 International Journal For Legal Research and Analysis

Designed by 1Web Experts