INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

ISSUES AND THE POSH ACT’S EFFECTIVENESS, WITH A FOCUS ON THE HEALTH FIELD By - Mohini Das

Authors: Mohini Das

Registration ID: 101659 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1659

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: mohinidas999@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-77639481/ISSUES AND THE POSH ACT’S EFFECTIVENESS, WITH A

Freedom Of Artistic Expression: A Critical Analysis By - Anindita C Bhaumik

Authors: Anindita C Bhaumik

Registration ID: 101658 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1658

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: anindita8991@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-48588618/Freedom Of Artistic Expression: A Critical Analysi

Critical Analysis Of Sec.138 Of Negotiable Instruments Act by - Rajeshree R. Jorwar

Authors: Rajeshree R. Jorwar

Registration ID: 101657 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1657

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: rajeshree4501@gmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-58887238/Critical Analysis Of Sec.138 Of Negotiable Instrum

LAW RELATING TO BAIL FOR UNDER-TRIAL PRISONERS IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM By - Harshit Dua & Shelly Dixit

Authors: Harshit Dua & Shelly Dixit

Registration ID: 101655 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1655 & IJLRA1656

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: ADVOCATEHARSHITDUA@GMAIL.COM & SHELLYDIXIT36@GMAIL.COM

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-78241767/LAW RELATING TO BAIL FOR UNDER-TRIAL PRISONERS IN

TERMINATION OF ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY, A SOCIETAL STIGMA By- Madhushree Sarkar & Purba Chakraborty

Authors: Madhushree Sarkar & Purba Chakraborty

Registration ID: 101653 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1653 IJLRA1654

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: Madhushreemom143ssarkar@gmail.com & purbachakraborty1080@gmail.com

Page No : 08 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-74285516/TERMINATION OF ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY, A SOCIETAL ST

THE RIGHT OF WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES TO CHILDCARE By - Akanksha

Authors: Akanksha

Registration ID: 101652 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1652

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: akankshamishra1706@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-56698772/THE RIGHT OF WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES TO CHILDCA

HONOUR KILLING IN INDIA by – Aarti Rawal

Authors: Aarti Rawal

Registration ID: 101651 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1651

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: rawalaarti1996@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-29557811/HONOUR KILLING IN INDIA

Tax Implications On Reconstituion Of Partnership Firm By: Avani Maheshwari

Authors: Avani Maheshwari

Registration ID: 101650 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1650

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: avani.maheshwari203@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-96611636/Tax Implications On Reconstituion Of Partnership F

Constitutional Provisions Regarding Transgender In India By - Pratibha Rai

Authors: Pratibha Rai

Registration ID: 101649 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1649

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: Pratibharai20@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-67857713/Constitutional Provisions Regarding Transgender In

A Critical Analysis Consumer Protection Act 2019: A Comparative Study With USA & UK by: Arathi Unnikrishnan

Authors: Arathi Unnikrishnan

Registration ID: 101648 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1648

Year : April -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: arathi.unnikrishnan@law.christuniversity.in

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-24797321/A Critical Analysis Consumer Protection Act 2019:

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Alfredo Casella, Otis Kincaid, What is Art?, 8, Oxford University Press, 1, 1, (1922).

[2] Mataichi Miya, What Is Art?, 217, The North America Review, , 829, 829, (1923).

[4] Dr. Derek Fincham, How Law Defines Art, 14 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 314, 314 (2015).

[5] A.J. Close, Commonplace Theories of Art and Nature in Classical Antiquity and in the Renaissance, 30 JHI, 467, 467, (1969).

[11] Jonathan Barrett, If Philosophers Can't Tell Us What Art Is, Can Officials?, 15 J. Australasian TAX Tchrs. Ass'n 13 (2020).

[12] Leonard D. DuBoff, What Is Art - Toward a Legal Definition, 12 Hastings COMM. & ENT.L.J. 303 (1989).

[13] Copyright Act, 1957, No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 1957 (India).

[14] Abhinav Chandrachud, Republic of Rhetoric: Free Speech and the Constitution of India, 1, Penguin Random House, (2017).

[18] Ayush Kumar, Reasonable Restriction regarding freedom of Speech and Expression, 2 LAW Essential J. 255, 255, 257, (2021).

[21] Hashneet Kaur & Kritika, Freedom of Speech and Expression: An Overview, 3 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 1072 (2020).

[22] Soli J. Sorabjee, Freedom of Expression and Censorship: Some Aspects of the Indian Experience, 45 N. IR LEGAL Q. 327, 327, (1994).

[23] Madhavi Goradia Divan, Facets of Media Law, 597, 2^nd Edition, Reprinted 2018, (2006).

[27] Indian Express Newspaper vs. Union of India 1986 AIR 515.

[28] Life Insurance Corporation & Ors. vs. Prof. Manubhai D Shah & Cinemark Foundation, AIR 1993 SC 171.

[31] Hashneet Kaur & Kritika, Freedom of Speech and Expression: An Overview, 3 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 1072, 1075-1076, (2020).

[32] Adrita Ghosh, Freedom of Speech and Expression: Relevance in Democracy, 2 Jus Corpus L.J. 752, 753 (2022).

[33] Association for Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India, AIR 2001 Delhi 126.

[35] Taruna Nayyar, Cyber Bullying and Online Freedom of Speech and Expression in India, 4 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 2639 (2021).

[36] John Hospers, The Concept of Artistic Expression, 55 OUP on behalf of Aristotelian Society, 313, 315 (1954-1955).

[38] United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) 23^rd Session Report of Special Rapporteur in the field of Cultural Rights, Fareeda Shaheed (14 March 2013), UN Doc A/HRC/23/34, 9.

[40] S.P Gupta vs. Union of India, 1981 Supp SCC 87.

[41] United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, Artistic Freedom: Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights, UN Doc A/HRC/23/34, A/HRC/37/55.

[42] United Nations (General Assembly), 1966, “International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”. Treaty Series 999 (December): 171.

[43] United Nations (General Assembly), 1966, “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”. Treaty Series 999 (December): 171.

[44] UN General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, 217 A (III).

[45] United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) 23^rd Session Report of Special Rapporteur in the field of Cultural Rights Fareeda Shaheed (14 March 2013), UN Doc A/HRC/23/34.

[48] United Nations Human Rights Council, 22^nd Session Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, (11 January 2013), UN Doc A/HRC/22/17/Add.4.

[50] UN General Assembly, International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, 21 December 1965, United Nations, Treaty Series 660.

[52] Maqbool Fida Husain v/s Raj Kumar Pandey, 2008 SCC OnLine Del 562.

[55] Kedar Nath vs. Union of India, 1995 (1) SCALE 521.

[56] Indian Penal Code, 1860, Act No. 45 of 1860, Acts of Parliament, 6^th October (1860).

[57] Brij Bhushan v/s The State of Delhi, 1950 AIR 129.

[58] K.A. Abbas v/s Union of India & Anr., 1971 AIR 481.

[4] As per RBI Notification No. RBI/2011-12/251, DBOD.AML BC. No. 47/14.01.001/2011-12, dated 4th November 2011 (with effect from 01-04-2012) the validity period of Cheques, Demand Drafts, Pay Orders and Banker's Cheques will be reduced from six (6) months to three (3) months, from the date of mentioned in the instrument.

[12] Criminal Misc. Application No. 13062 of 2011

[15] Rohan Tiwari, Decriminalization of Dishonor of Cheques -A step Backwards, BAR AND BENCH (https://www.barandbench.com/columns/decriminalization-of-dishonor-of-cheques-a-step-backwards)

[24] Dayawati v. Yogesh Kumar Gosain 2017 SCC Online Del 11032.

[25] Settlement of disputes outside the Court: (1) Where it appears to the court that there exist elements of a settlement which may be acceptable to the parties, the court shall formulate the terms of settlement and give them to the parties for their observations and after receiving the observation of the parties, the court may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for-

a) arbitration;

b) Conciliation

c) judicial settlement including settlement through Lok Adalat; or

d) mediation.

Where a dispute had been referred-

a) for arbitration or conciliation, the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 shall apply as if the proceedings for arbitration or conciliation were referred for settlement under the provisions of that Act.

b) to Lok Adalat, the court shall refer the same to the Lok Adalat in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 20 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 and all other provisions of that Act shall apply in respect of the dispute so referred to the Lok Adalat;

c) for judicial settlement, the court shall refer the same to a suitable institution or person and such institution or person shall be deemed to be a Lok Adalat and all the provisions of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 shall apply as if the dispute were referred to a Lok Adalat under the provisions of that Act;

d) for mediation, the court shall affect a compromise between the parties and shall follow such procedure as may be prescribed.

[26] Meters and Instruments (P) Ltd. v. Kanchan Mehta (2018) 1 SCC 560.

[27] Power to stop proceedings in certain cases: In any summons- case instituted otherwise than upon complaint, a Magistrate of the first class or, with the previous sanction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, any other Judicial Magistrate, may, for reasons to be recorded by him, stop the proceedings at any stage without pronouncing any judgment and where such stoppage of proceedings is made after the evidence of the principal witnesses has been recorded, pronounce a judgment of acquittal, and in any other case, release the accused, and such release shall have the effect of discharge.

[28] Order to pay compensation: (1) When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied-

a) in defraying the expenses properly incurred in the prosecution;

b) in the payment to any person of compensation for any loss or injury caused by the offence, when compensation is, in the opinion of the Court, recoverable by such person in a Civil Court;

c) when any person is convicted of any offence for having caused the death of another person or of having abetted the commission of such an offence, in paying compensation to the persons who are, under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (13 of 1855 ), entitled to recover damages from the person sentenced for the loss resulting to them from such death;

d) when any person is convicted of any offence which includes theft, criminal misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, or of having dishonestly received or retained, or of having voluntarily assisted in disposing of, stolen property knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen, in compensating any bona fide purchaser of such property for the loss of the same if such property is restored to the possession of the person entitled thereto,

(2) If the fine is imposed in a case which is subject to appeal, no such payment shall be made before the period allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed, or, if an appeal be presented, before the decision of the appeal,

(3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced,

(4) An order under this section may also be made by an Appellate Court or by the High Court or Court of Session when exercising its powers of revision,

(5) At the time of awarding compensation in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter, the Court shall take into account any sum paid or recovered as compensation under this section.

[29] Money ordered to be paid recoverable as a fine: Any money (other than a fine) payable by virtue of any order made under this Code, and the method of recovery of which is not otherwise expressly provided for, shall be recoverable as if it were a fine:

Provided that Section 421 shall, in its application to an order under Section 359, by virtue of this section, be construed as if in the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 421, after the words and figures 'under Section 357', the words and figures 'or an order for payment of costs under Section 359' had been inserted.

[30] Judgment in cases tried summarily: In every case tried summarily in which the accused does not plead guilty, the Magistrate shall record the substance of the evidence and a judgment containing a brief statement of the reasons for the finding.

[31] Presumption in favour of holder: It shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the holder of a cheque received the cheque of the nature referred to in section 138 for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability.

[5] BARE ACT, THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (2 OF 1974) , AMBITION PUBLICATIONS, NEW DELHI

[6] BARE ACT, THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (2 OF 1974) , AMBITION PUBLICATIONS, NEW DELHI

[2] The Constitution of India (44 OF 2019); page 11

[3] X versus The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr2022(SC)809

[2] Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

ISSUES AND THE POSH ACT’S EFFECTIVENESS, WITH A FOCUS ON THE HEALTH FIELD By - Mohini Das

Freedom Of Artistic Expression: A Critical Analysis By - Anindita C Bhaumik

Critical Analysis Of Sec.138 Of Negotiable Instruments Act by - Rajeshree R. Jorwar

LAW RELATING TO BAIL FOR UNDER-TRIAL PRISONERS IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM By - Harshit Dua & Shelly Dixit

TERMINATION OF ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY, A SOCIETAL STIGMA By- Madhushree Sarkar & Purba Chakraborty

THE RIGHT OF WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES TO CHILDCARE By - Akanksha

HONOUR KILLING IN INDIA by – Aarti Rawal

Tax Implications On Reconstituion Of Partnership Firm By: Avani Maheshwari

Constitutional Provisions Regarding Transgender In India By - Pratibha Rai

A Critical Analysis Consumer Protection Act 2019: A Comparative Study With USA & UK by: Arathi Unnikrishnan

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2