INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] C. Perry Patterson, The Evolution of Constitutionalism, 32 Minnesota Law Review 427, 427 (1948)

[1] Johari, J. C. Comparative politics [by] J. C. Johari Sterling Publishers New Delhi 1972

[1] https://blog.ipleaders.in/constitutionalism-limited-government/

[1] https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-system/Constitutional-government

[1] https://www.wallstreetmojo.com/limited-government/

[1] Maru Bazezew, Constitutionalism, Mizan Law Review Vol. 3, 2009

[1] S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab, (2001) 7 SCC 126

[1] I.R. Coelho (Dead) By Lrs vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors, 2007

[1] Dr. Ashok Jain, Intellectual Property Law- I (3^rd ed. 2011)

[1] Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH, C- 145/10 (the Court of Justice of European Union, 2011)

[1] LTC Harms, “Originality” and “Reproduction” in Copyright Law with Special Reference to Photographs, Vol 6 No 5 (2013)

[1] Temple Islands Collections v. New English Teas PCC 1 (2012)

[1] Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985)

[1] Meg Dolan, Misusing Misuse: Why Copyright Misuse Is Unnecessary, Vol 17 No 2(2007)

[1] Tarunabh Khaitan, Jane Calderwood Norton, THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE RIGHT AGAINST RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION: THEORETICAL DISTINCTIONS, International Journal of Constitutional Law (2020).

[1] U.N. General Assembly, ARTICLE 18, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, 217 A (III), available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html [accessed 12 March 2022].

[1] INDIA CONST. preamble, amended by The Constitution (Forty Second Amendment) Act, 1976.

[1] Ratial v the State of Bombay AIR 1954 SC 388.

[1]The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Shri Lakshmindar Tirtha Swamiyar of Shri Shirur Mutt 1954 AIR 282, 1954 SCR 1005.

[1]Karnataka Education Act, 1983 § 145(1), No. 1, Acts of Karnataka State Legislature, 1995 (India).

[1] Ashok Kumar Thakur v the Union of India (2008)6 SCC 1 at p. 699.

[1] Keshavananda Bharti v. the State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225: AIR 1973 SC 1461.

[1] Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain, (1975) AIR 865, 1975 SCR (3) 333.

[1] S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, 1994 AIR 1918, 1994 SCC (3) 1.

[1] Lautsi v. Italy, Application no 30814/06: ECHR (Grand Chamber).

[1] The Conversation. 2022. Why do Muslim women wear a hijab? [online] Available at: https://theconversation.com/why-do-muslim-women-wear-a-hijab-109717 [Accessed 24 March 2022].

[1]Mark Juergensmeyer & W.C. Roof, ENCYCLOPAEDIA OF GLOBAL RELIGION, 515-516 (SAGE Publications 2012).

[1]State of T.N. v. K. Shyam Sunder, (2011) 8 SCC 737.

[1]Sri Sri Sri Lakshamana Yatendrulu & Others v State of A.P. & Another (1996)8 SCC 705 (para 14).

[1] The Gazette of India (PDF). 9 December 2019. Retrieved 12 December 2020

[1] The Right to information Act 2005 section 24(1): Act not to apply to certain organizations: Nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the intelligence and security organizations specified in the Second Schedule, being organizations established by the Central Government or any information furnished by such organizations to that Government:

[1] The Right to information Act 2005 section 8(1)(g): information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes;

[1] Rajinder Saini vs State of Punjab and Ors on 16 September, 2015

[1] Randeep Singh Surjewala vs Union of India and Others on 10 March, 2017

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

LIABILITY FOR PRIVATE SPACE ACTIVITIES: Analyzing The Trends In Shifting Of Liability From The States To Private Space Actors (BIPRO PRATIM DAS)

PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFTEY & CONVENIENCE OFFENCES UNDER IPC (By Atul Anand)

Constitutionalism Of Limited Government (By Vijay Kumar)

Analysis:- Anti-Defection Law ( By Tanishq J Dasari)

International Organizations and Settlement of the Conflict in Ukraine (By Dr. S. Krishnan)

"Going Bananas Over a Monkey Selfie : A Critical Analysis on a case of Copyright Infringement"(By Pritha Ghosh

The Right To Freedom Of Religion: The Hijab Controversy (By Divyanjali Nigam)

Paradigm Of Protection By Bestowed Regime (By Roopa P)

Zakir Hussain vs Union Territory of Ladakh (By Harshita Purohit)

A Comparative Analysis On Tribunalisation Of Justice In India With Special Reference To The Structure In Australia, France, Uk And Us. (By Jaisy Elza Joe)

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2