[19] Article on informed consent by Late Lt. Gen. NR Krishnan
Citation
[1] Howard R. Bowen, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, 3 (Iowa City: University Of Iowa Press, University of Iowa Faculty Connections), 2013.
[3] Nitin Kumar, A Study of CSR Rules under Companies Act, 2013, Vol. 2 Issue 5, AJMS, 142, 143-144 (2014).
[4] Gorasiya and Chudasama, White Collar Crime in Indian Context, Vol. 4 Issue 2, NJCSL, 1, 2-3 (2021).
[5]Sally S. Simpson, Making Sense of White-Collar Crime: Theory and Research, 8 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 481 (Spring 2011).
[6] H. Manchiraju and S. Rajgopal, Does Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Create Shareholder Value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013, Vol. 55 No. 5, JAR, 1257, 1259 (2017).
[8] Nihal Gulammahiyuddin Shaikh and Dhaval Chudasama. Research on Cyber Offenses under Information Technology Act, 2000. Recent Trends in Parallel Computing, Vol 8 Issue 1, pp. 14–20, 2021, ISSN: 2393-8749 UGC Approved (S. No 47081).
[9] Himmelberg, Hubbard, and Palia, Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and Link Between Ownership and Performance, 53 JAF 353, 356-357 (1999).
[10] Dunn, Craig P. and Burton, Brian K., Friedman’s “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”: A Critique for the Classroom (2006). Management. 7.
[12] Tim V. Eaton & Sam Korach, A Criminilogical Profile of White-Collar Crime, Vol. 32 No. 1 JABR 129, 131-138 (2016).
[13] Rachel E. Severson, Zachery H. Kodatt, and George W. Buruss, Explaining White-Collar Crime: Individual-Level Theories, (Melissa L. Rorie, The Handbook of White-Collar Crime, 1st Edition).
[14] Geoffrey Heal, Corporate Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework, 30 The Geneva Papers 387, 389-390 (2005).
[16] Khurram Sultan Langraw & Adil Zaman, Corporate Social Responsibility and White Collar Crimes: Exploring how companies can promote ethical behaviour and prevent white collar crime within their organisation, Vol 3 Issue 2. IJSSE 349, 353-361 (2023).
[21] McGurrin, Danielle, Melissa Jarrell, Amber Jahn and Brandy Cochrane. 2013. White Collar Crime Representation in the Criminological Literature Revisited, 2001-2010. Western Criminology Review 14(2):3-19.
Citation
Citation
[1]Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
[2]Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
[3] Pierre N. Leval, Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105 (1990).
[4] Jeffrey P. Cunard, Parody as Fair Use in Copyright Law: Economic Disincentives and Reasonable Access to Copyrighted Works, 54 Fordham L. Rev. 419 (1986).
[5] Seth Grahame-Smith, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, Quirk Books (2009).
[6] Geoffrey Baym, The Daily Show and the Reinvention of Political Journalism, Political Communication, Vol. 22, No. 3 (2005).
[7] Lawrence Lessig, Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy, Penguin Press (2008).
[8] Directive (EU) 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market.
[10] Neil Netanel, Copyright’s Paradox, Oxford University Press (2008).
[11]17 U.S.C. § 107 – The four-factor test for fair use under the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976.
[12]Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) – The case that established commercial parody as fair use and emphasized transformative use.
[13] Pierre N. Leval, Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105 (1990).
[14]Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1998) – Ruled that a parody of a Vanity Fair cover photograph was transformative fair use.
[15]Mattel, Inc. v. Walking Mountain Productions, 353 F.3d 792 (9th Cir. 2003) – Held that parodic photographs of Barbie dolls were protected under fair use.
[16]Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc., 109 F.3d 1394 (9th Cir. 1997) – Ruled against a satirical book for failing to directly critique Dr. Seuss’s work.
[17] R. Tushnet, Copy This Book: Why Making Media Means Making Trouble, University of Minnesota Press (2020).
[18]Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001) – Addressed fair use in the context of parody and transformative literary works.
[19]Directive (EU) 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – European regulations that recognize exceptions for parody and caricature.
[20]Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 815 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2016) – A case discussing fair use in digital content and automated copyright takedowns.
[21] Lawrence Lessig, Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy, Penguin Press (2008).
[22]The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 4545.
[23] Pierre N. Leval, Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105 (1990).
[24]Constitution of India, Article 19(1)(a) – Right to freedom of speech and expression.
[25]Blackwood and Sons Ltd. v. Parasuraman, AIR 1959 Mad 410.
[26]Civic Chandran v. Ammini Amma, AIR 1996 Ker 67.
[28]17 U.S.C. § 107 – U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, outlining fair use principles.
[29]Directive (EU) 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Establishes copyright exceptions for parody, caricature, and pastiche.
[30]UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, as amended by The Copyright and Rights in Performances (Quotation and Parody) Regulations 2014.
[31]Australian Copyright Act 1968, amended in 2006 to include parody and satire under fair dealing exceptions.
[32]Japanese Copyright Law – No explicit exception for parody, making its legal status uncertain.
[33]Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) – Established that commercial parody can qualify as fair use.
[34] Pierre N. Leval, Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105 (1990).
[35]Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562 (1977) – Defined Right to Publicity and its relation to artistic works.
[36]Shri Ashwani Dhir v. The State of Bihar, Patna High Court, 2010 – Recognized political parody as protected artistic expression.
[37]Ashutosh Dubey v. Netflix, Delhi High Court, 2020 – Held that satire in stand-up comedy is protected under artistic freedom.
[38]Tata Sons Ltd. v. Greenpeace International & Anr., (2011) 178 DLT 705 – Corporate satire was held as protected free speech.
[39] Pierre N. Leval, Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105 (1990).
[40]Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
[41] R. Tushnet, Copy This Book: Why Making Media Means Making Trouble, University of Minnesota Press (2020).
[42] S. Ricketson & J. Ginsburg, International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond, Oxford University Press (2019).
[43]Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984) – Emphasizing the importance of transformative use in copyright cases.
[44] Neil Netanel, Copyright’s Paradox, Oxford University Press (2008).
[45] L. Lessig, Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy, Penguin Press (2008).
[46]Dr. Seuss Enterprises v. Penguin Books, 109 F.3d 1394 (9th Cir. 1997) – Highlighting the limits of fair use for satire.
[47]Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 815 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2016) – Addressing digital copyright takedowns and fair use.
[48]YouTube v. Viacom, 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012) – Discussing challenges in automated copyright enforcement.
[49]Australian Copyright Act 1968, amended in 2006 to recognize parody and satire
[50] J. Phillips, Parody and Copyright: Comparative Legal Approaches, Oxford Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2017.
[51] R. Burrell & A. Coleman, Copyright Exceptions: The Digital Impact, Cambridge University Press (2005).
Citation
[1] 2024, 27 June (2024) FAQs: Types of violence against women and girls, UN Women – Headquarters. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/faqs/faqs-types-of-violence-against-women-and-girls (Accessed: 08 March 2025).
[4]Violence against women (no date) World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women (Accessed: 18 March 2025).
[5] Mollan, C. (2025) Kerala: Dalit woman in India alleges rape by 64 men over five years, BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cedn031d563o (Accessed: 18 March 2025).
[6] Section 498A, Indian Penal Code, 1860: Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty. —Whoever,being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation.—For the purpose of this section, “cruelty” means— (a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or (b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.
[7] Yadav, H. (no date) UNVEILING THE DARK SIDE OF CYBERSPACE: A STUDY OF CYBER CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA. , IJFANS ITERNATIONAL JOURNAL of FOOD and NUTRITIONAL SCIENCES. Available at: https://ijfans.org/uploads/paper/bb1038ebab972d9fa24b1706e43755bc.pdf (Accessed: 18 March 2025).
[8] Kgs (2024) Crime against women rises, UPSC Current Affairs 2025. Available at: https://currentaffairs.khanglobalstudies.com/crime-against-women-rises/ (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
[9] 2022, 18 November (2022) Push forward: 10 ways to end violence against women, UN Women – Headquarters. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/feature-story/2022/11/push-forward-10-ways-to-end-violence-against-women (Accessed: 08 March 2025).
[10] 2022, 18 November (2022) Push forward: 10 ways to end violence against women, UN Women – Headquarters. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/feature-story/2022/11/push-forward-10-ways-to-end-violence-against-women (Accessed: 08 March 2025).
[11] National commission for women; available at https://www.ncw.gov.in/(Accessed on: 18march2025)
[12] Admin (2024) Empowering women: Understanding laws for women in India, LexisNexis Blogs. Available at: https://www.lexisnexis.in/blogs/laws-for-women-in-india/ (Accessed: 15 March 2025).
[13] Parliament. (1971). THE MEDICAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY ACT, 1971 [Legal]. In THE MEDICAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY ACT, 1971. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1593/1/A1971-34.pdf (Accessed on: 15 march 2025)
[14] Parliament. (1961). THE MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961. In THE MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/17115/1/maternity_benefit.pdf (Accessed on 17 march 2025)
[15]Equal Remuneration Acts and Rules, 1976 Ministry of Labour & Employment|Government of India. (n.d.). https://labour.gov.in/womenlabour/equal-remuneration-acts-and-rules-1976(Accessed on: 17 march 2025)
[16] Parliament of India. (2007). THE PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT, 2006. In THE PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT 2006, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15943/1/the_prohibition_of_child_marriage_act%2C_2006.pdf(accessed on 17th march 2025)
[17] Parliament of India. (1986). THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986. In THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15350/1/indecent_representation_of_women_%28prohibition%29_act%2C_1986.pdf(accessed on 17th march 2025)
[18] Parliament of India. (1990). THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN ACT, 1990. In THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN ACT, 1990. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1944/1/199020.pdf(accessed on 17th march 2025)
Citation
[1] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Traditional Knowledge,https://www.wipo.int/tk/en/ (last visited Mar. 18, 2025).
[2] Vandana Shiva, Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge 45 (1997).
[3] United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), A/RES/61/295 (2007).
[10] Christine M. Hodge et al., The Importance of Indigenous Knowledge in Biodiversity Conservation, 14 Biodiversity & Conservation 1234 (2005).
[11] Convention on Biological Diversity art. 8(j), June 5, 1992, 1760 U.N.T.S. 79.
[12] Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization art. 7, Oct. 29, 2010, U.N.T.S. 30619.
[13] Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994).
[14] Aileen Moreton-Robinson, The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty 28–32 (2015).
[19] Anusree Bhowmick et al., A Brief Review on the Turmeric Patent Case with Its Implications on the Documentation of Traditional Knowledge, 1 NDC E-BIOs 83, 87 (2021). https://www.ndcebios.in/v1n1/2021010110.pdf
[31] Cynthia M. Ho, Biopiracy and Beyond: A Consideration of Socio-Cultural Conflicts with Global Patent Policies, 39 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 433, 433 (2006),https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/232706572.pdf.
[40] Brendan Tobin, The Fundamental Role of Customary Law in Protection of Indigenous Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge, 9 LAW, ENV'T & DEV. J. 142, 142 (2013),https://lead-journal.org/content/13142.pdf.
[1] Vanessa A. B. Oliveira & Joana L. Machado, Community Intervention Programs for Sex Offenders: A Systematic Review, 15 Aggression & Violent Behavior 355 (2022)
[2] Robert E. Freeman-Longo, Juvenile Sex Offender Treatment at State-Operated Correctional Facilities, 34 Int'l J. Offender Therapy & Comp. Criminology 131 (1990)
[3] Michael F. Caldwell, The Effective Treatment of Juveniles Who Sexually Offend: An Ethical Imperative, 4 Ethics & Behavior 291 (2010)
[4] X (Juvenile) v. State of U.P., 2023:AHC:153753 (India)
[5] Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana, (2013) 7 SCC 263 (India)
[6] Vinay Sharma v. Union of India, (2012) 6 SCC 1 (India)
[8] Jennifer A. Vaught, Treatment Approaches When Working with Juvenile Sex Offenders (May 2019) (M.S.W. thesis, California State University, San Bernardino)
Citation
[1]Indian Law Institute, "Legal Framework for Health Care in India", Butterworths(2002), p.p. 27
[2]Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee,1 WLR 582,1957