INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND THE U.S CONSTITUTION BY - KALPANA

Authors: KALPANA
Registration ID: 109383 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9383
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: kalpanalamba248@gmail.com
Page No: 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-48955552/COMPARATIVE STUDY OF APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL REVIE

A STUDY OF VIKSIT BHARAT 2047 - ROADMAP THROUGH SMES BASED FINANCING SCHEMES AND SME-LED INDIAN ECONOMIC GROWTH. BY - DR. (MS.) ASHIMA NEGI & MR. SAHIL S.

Authors: DR. (MS.) ASHIMA NEGI & MR. SAHIL S.
Registration ID: 109381 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9381 & IJLRA9382
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: ashima.negi@yahoo.co.in & negi1983@yahoo.co.in
Page No: 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-77662865/A STUDY OF VIKSIT BHARAT 2047 - ROADMAP THROUGH SM

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK GOVERNING CROSS-BORDER MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN INDIA. BY - ANKITA ROY

Authors: ANKITA ROY
Registration ID: 109380 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9380
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: ankita.roy@law.christuniversity.in
Page No: 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2025-28427973/A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK G

ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING LAWS IN INDIA BY - SAHANA BALARAJ & DR. SIVANANDA KUMAR

Authors: SAHANA BALARAJ & DR. SIVANANDA KUMAR
Registration ID: 109378 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9378 & IJLRA9379
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: shreelbp@gmail.com
Page No: 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-14724166/ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING LAWS IN INDIA

RANDEEP SINGH @ RANA & ANR. V. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. BY - SHREELAKSHMI BHAT P

Authors: SHREELAKSHMI BHAT P
Registration ID: 109377 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9377
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: shreelbp@gmail.com
Page No: 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-75815959/RANDEEP SINGH @ RANA & ANR. V. STATE OF HARYANA &

CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POSITION OF WOMEN AT THEIR WORKPLACE BY - PRABHJOT KAUR

Authors: PRABHJOT KAUR
Registration ID: 109376 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9376
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: prbhjot46@gmail.com
Page No: 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-34761963/CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POSITION OF WOMEN AT THEI

A TRYST WITH DISSENT BY - JOSEPH JUDE JACOB

Authors: JOSEPH JUDE JACOB
Registration ID: 109375 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9375
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: josephjudenj@gmail.com
Page No: 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-86812826/A TRYST WITH DISSENT

RECONCILING RELATIONSHIPS: A SOCIAL SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE ON THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984 BY - DR RAJESH KUMAR VERMA & BANDANA SINGH

Authors: DR RAJESH KUMAR VERMA & BANDANA SINGH
Registration ID: 109373 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9373 & IJLRA9374
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: rajlw111@gmail.com & singhbandana2111@gmail.com
Page No: 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-19399474/RECONCILING RELATIONSHIPS: A SOCIAL SCIENCE PERSPE

REAFFIRMING THE RIGHT TO A SAFE WORKPLACE: A CASE COMMENTARY ON THE SUPREME COURT’S 2024 RULING IN THE KOLKATA DOCTOR’S MURDER CASE BY: ADONA MARIA JAMES

Authors: ADONA MARIA JAMES
Registration ID: 109372 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9372
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: adonajaimy@gmail.com
Page No: 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-89128753/REAFFIRMING THE RIGHT TO A SAFE WORKPLACE: A CASE

INDIAN JUDICIARY’S STANCE ON VIRTUAL HEARINGS AND SERVICE OF SUMMONS VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS UNDER THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 BY - GAUREEKA NATH

Authors: GAUREEKA NATH
Registration ID: 109371 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9371
Year: Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Email Id: Gaureekanath@gmail.com
Page No: 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065
DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-31595189/INDIAN JUDICIARY’S STANCE ON VIRTUAL HEARINGS AN

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803).

[2] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461.

[9] McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819).

[10] Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952).

[14] United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995).

[16] INDIA CONST. art. 32; Ramesh Thappar v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 124.

[17] INDIA CONST. art. 226; Daryao v. State of U.P., AIR 1961 SC 1457.

[19] Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, (1980) 3 SCC 625.

[20] I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2007) 2 SCC 1.

[21] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248.

[22] S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, (1994) 3 SCC 1.

[23] Golaknath v. State of Punjab, AIR 1967 SC 1643.

[24] M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1987) 1 SCC 395.

[25] Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 SCC 241.

[30] Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952).

[35] Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton Univ. Press 1997).

[38] United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974).

[1] Companies Act, 2013, No. 18, Acts of Parliament, 2013 (India).

[2] Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, No. 42, Acts of Parliament, 1999 (India).

[4] Securities and Exchange Board of India (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2021, SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2021/22 (India).

[5] Reserve Bank of India, Master Direction on External Commercial Borrowings, Trade Credits, and Structured Obligations, RBI/2018-19/1 (India).

[6] National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016, Notification No. G.S.R. 534(E) (India)

[8] CS Jyoti Kholi, Company Law – Articles, Tax Guru (July 11, 2020), https://www.taxguru.in.

[9] Competition Commission of India, Pre-Filing Consultation Guidance Note, https://www.cci.gov.in (last visited Oct. 10, 2023).

[10] Securities and Exchange Board of India, https://www.sebi.gov.in (last visited Oct. 10, 2023).

[11] Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, https://www.trai.gov.in (last visited Oct. 10, 2023).

[12] Lalit Mathur, Introduction to Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions, LinkedIn (Aug. 11, 2020), https://www.linkedin.com.

[13] SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011, SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2011-12/03/3730 (India).

[14] Foreign Exchange Management (Cross Border Merger) Regulations, 2018, Notification No. FEMA 389/2018-RB (India).

[15] Jesal Shethna, Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions, EduCBA, https://www.educba.com.

[1] What is Money Laundering?, Duhaime, Christine available at http://www.antimoneylaunderinglaw.com/

[2] The Anti-Money Laundering & Counter Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Australia), the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (New Zealand), and the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Financial Institutions) Ordinance (Cap 615) available at https://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2006A00169/

[5] What is Money Laundering, International Compliance Association available at http://www.int-comp.org/what-is-money-laundering/

[7] FAQ on Money Laundering, Financial Intelligence Unit- India, available at http://fiuindia.gov.in/faq-moneylaundering.htm/

[12] Overview(Prevention of Money Laundering), Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance available at http://dor.gov.in/overview_pml/

[14] Tax amnesties turn HMRC into ‘biggest money-laundering operation in history, Ian Cowie available at http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/

[16] Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, Press Information Bureau, Govt. of India available at http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=9941/

[1] Randeep Singh @ Rana and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Others. 2024 INSC 887 https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2023/51279/51279_2023_5_1502_57415_Judgement_22-Nov-2024.pdf

[2] Section 23(1) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

[3] Section 23(2) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

[4] Proviso to Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

[5] Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

[6] Subhash Chand vs State Of Rajasthan, 2002 (1) SCC 702

[1] First Year B.A. LL.B. (Hons) student at School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore.

[3] Russel Bova, ‘Democracy and Liberty: The Cultural Connection’ [1997] Journal of Democracy John Hopkins University Press 112

[4] EPW Engage, ‘Dissent in a Democracy: Political Imprisonment under the UAPA in India’ [2022] Economic and Political Weekly (Engage) <https://www.epw.in/engage/article/dissent-democracy-political-imprisonment-under> accessed 24 February 2025

[6] Mahendra Pal Singh, V.N. Shukla’s Constitution of India,

[7] Express Newspapers (P) Ltd v Union of India [1986] 1 SCC 133;

Bijoe Emmanuel v State of Kerala [1986] 3 SCC 615

[9] Murali Krishnan, ‘Criticism of government not sedition, Majoritarianism cannot be the law: Justice Deepak Gupta’ (Bar and Bench, 7 September 2019) <https://www.barandbench.com/news/criticism-of-government-not-sedition-majoritarianism-cannot-be-the-law-justice-deepak-gupta> accessed 24 February 2025

[15]Ritu Sarin, ‘IB report to PMO: Greenpeace is a threat to national economic security’ (The Indian Express, 11 June 2014) https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/ib-report-to-pmo-greenpeace-is-a-threat-to-national-economic-security/ accessed 14 March 2025.

[17] United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, ‘Umar Khalid’ (USCIRF, 12 March 2024) https://www.uscirf.gov/religious-prisoners-conscience/forb-victims-database/umar-khalid accessed 14 March 2025.

[18] Ishita Mishra, ‘Four years and counting, Umar Khalid languishes in jail without bail or trial’ (The Hindu, 14 September 2024) https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/four-years-and-counting-umar-khalid-languishes-in-jail-without-bail-or-trial/article68640212.ece accessed 14 March 2025.

[19] Suhasini Raj, ‘Four Years in Jail Without Trial: The Price of Dissent in Modi’s India’ (The New York Times, 22 October 2024) https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/22/world/asia/india-muslim-dissent.html accessed 14 March 2025.

[20] Shariq Us Sabah, ‘Sedition Law: Crushing Dissent in India since 1833’ (Citizens for Justice and Peace, 7 September 2018) https://cjp.org.in/sedition-law-crushing-dissent-in-india-since-1833/ accessed 14 March 2025.

[21] Prasun Sonwalkar, ‘Sedition law in UK abolished in 2009, continues in India’ (Hindustan Times, 16 February 2016) https://www.hindustantimes.com/world/sedition-law-in-uk-abolished-in-2009-continues-in-india/story-Pkrvylv6J0T3ddY8uqvKsO.html accessed 14 March 2025.

[22] Amnesty International, ‘India: Supreme Court’s Temporary Suspension of Sedition Law a Welcome Step’ (Amnesty International, 11 May 2022) https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/05/india-supreme-courts-temporary-suspension-of-sedition-law-a-welcome-step/ accessed 14 March 2025.

[23] Apurva Vishwanath, ‘Sedition law repealed or strengthened in a new form? What the new IPC Bill says’ (The Indian Express, 13 August 2023) https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/sedition-law-repealed-or-strengthened-in-a-new-form-ipc-bill-8887864/ accessed 14 March 2025.

[25] Abdul Haseeb and Kimi Pandey, ‘Breaking Down the Fallacies in UAPA’ (LiveLaw, 13 June 2023) https://www.livelaw.in/articles/uapa-breaking-down-the-fallacies-unlawful-activities-230540#_ftnref8 accessed 14 March 2025.

[26] Vivan Eyben, ‘UAPA: Vague Definitions and Sweeping Powers’ (NewsClick, 29 August 2018) https://www.newsclick.in/uapa-vague-definitions-and-sweeping-powers accessed 14 March 2025.

[28] Manupatra, ‘A Bird’s Eye View of the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression in India’ (Manupatra) https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/A-Bird-s-Eye-View-of-the-Right-to-Freedom-of-Speech-and-Expression-in-India accessed 14 March 2025.

[30] Terminiello v City of Chicago 337 US 1 (1949)

[31] J T Garner and J P Ragland, ‘Tabling, Discussing, and Giving In: Dissent in Workgroups’ (2019) 23(1) Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000098 accessed 14 March 2025.

[33] Ojudubabafemi, ‘Dissent in Democracy: The Crucial Role of Free Expression’ (Medium, 7 June 2024) https://medium.com/@ojudubabafemi/dissent-in-democracy-the-crucial-role-of-free-expression-57f8983340bb accessed 14 March 2025.

[1] Associate Professor, School of Legal Studies, Babu Banarasi Das University, Lucknow U.P.

[2] Advocate, High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench & Guest Faculty.

^{^[7]} Aritra Ghosh, Workplace Safety in Indian Public Hospitals: Legal Framework and Challenges, 10 Indian J. Clinical & Anatomical Pathology (2024)

^{^[8]} In re Alleged Rape & Murder Incident of a Trainee Doctor in R.G. Kar Med. Coll. & Hosp., Kolkata & Related Issues, Suo Motu Writ (Crl.) No. 2 of 2024 (India)

[1] Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order V Rule 10A (India).

[2] Supreme Court of India (2020). In Re: Guidelines for Court Functioning Through Video Conferencing

[3] Sharma, P. (2020). E-Summons and the Future of Legal Notices. Indian Law Review.

[4] Desai, M. (2022). Cybersecurity Risks in Virtual Courtrooms. Technology & Law Review.

[5] Supreme Court of India (2020). Guidelines on Virtual Court Functioning.

[6] Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India (2020). Report on Virtual Courts and E-Courts.

[7] Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order V Rule 10A (India)

[8] Patel, R. (2021). Virtual Courts: A Step Towards Digital Justice. Indian Legal Journal.

[9] Supreme Court of India (2020). In Re: Guidelines for Court Functioning Through Video Conferencing.

[10] Sharma, P. (2020). E-Summons and the Future of Legal Notices. Indian Law Review.

[11] Supreme Court of India (2020). Guidelines on Virtual Court Functioning

[12] Swapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India, (2018) 13 SCC 574

[13] Supreme Court of India (2020). In Re: Guidelines for Court Functioning Through Video Conferencing

[14] Iyer, N. (2021). Digital Justice: Bridging the Gap in Indian Courts. Legal Perspectives Journal

[15] Sharma, P. (2020). E-Summons and the Future of Legal Notices. Indian Law Review.

[16] Desai, M. (2022). Cybersecurity Risks in Virtual Courtrooms. Technology & Law Review.

[17] Singh, A. (2015). Technology and Judicial Efficiency in India. Journal of Law & Policy.

[18] Kumar, R. (2021). COVID-19 and the Indian Judiciary: Adaptation to Virtual Hearings. Indian Law Review.

[19] Sharma, P. (2020). Digital Transformation in Judicial Procedures: An Analysis of CPC and IT Act. National Law Journal.

[20] Gupta, S. (2019). Open Justice and Virtual Courts: The Supreme Court’s Evolving Stance. Supreme Court Review

[21] Reddy, V. (2022). Natural Justice in the Age of Digital Courts. Journal of Legal Studies.

[22] Iyer, N. (2021). Bridging the Digital Divide: Access to Justice in Virtual Courts. Legal Perspectives Journal.

[23] Desai, M. (2022). Cybersecurity Risks in Virtual Courtrooms. Technology & Law Review.

[24] Patel, J. (2020). Efficiency vs. Fairness in Virtual Hearings: A Judicial Dilemma. Journal of Procedural Law.

^{^[25]} The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, No. 5, Acts of Parliament, 1908 (India).

^{^[26]} General Clauses Act, 1897, No. 10, Acts of Parliament, 1897 (India).

^{^[27]} Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

^{^[28]} Indian Evidence Act, 1872, No. 1, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

^{^[29]} KSL & Indus. Ltd. v. Mannalal Khandelwal, (2005) 13 SCC 24 (India).

^{^[30]} Tata Sons Ltd. v. John Doe, (2013) SCC OnLine Del 482 (India).

^{^[31]} Cent. Elec. Regulatory Comm’n v. Nat’l Hydroelectric Power Corp., (2010) 10 SCC 280 (India).

^{^[32]} SBI Cards & Payment Servs. Pvt. Ltd. v. Rohidas Jadhav, (2021) SCC OnLine SC 456 (India).

^{^[33]} Indian Bank v. Satyam Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd., (2022) SCC OnLine SC 987 (India).

^{^[35]} Code of Civil Procedure, No. 5 of 1908, INDIA CODE (1908).

^{^[38]}Supreme Court of Singapore, Integrated Case Management System (ICMS).

^{^[39]} Information Technology Act, No. 21 of 2000, INDIA CODE (2000).

^{^[40]} Code of Civil Procedure, No. 5 of 1908, § 27, INDIA CODE (1908).

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND THE U.S CONSTITUTION BY - KALPANA

A STUDY OF VIKSIT BHARAT 2047 - ROADMAP THROUGH SMES BASED FINANCING SCHEMES AND SME-LED INDIAN ECONOMIC GROWTH. BY - DR. (MS.) ASHIMA NEGI & MR. SAHIL S.

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK GOVERNING CROSS-BORDER MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN INDIA. BY - ANKITA ROY

ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING LAWS IN INDIA BY - SAHANA BALARAJ & DR. SIVANANDA KUMAR

RANDEEP SINGH @ RANA & ANR. V. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. BY - SHREELAKSHMI BHAT P

CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POSITION OF WOMEN AT THEIR WORKPLACE BY - PRABHJOT KAUR

A TRYST WITH DISSENT BY - JOSEPH JUDE JACOB

RECONCILING RELATIONSHIPS: A SOCIAL SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE ON THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984 BY - DR RAJESH KUMAR VERMA & BANDANA SINGH

REAFFIRMING THE RIGHT TO A SAFE WORKPLACE: A CASE COMMENTARY ON THE SUPREME COURT’S 2024 RULING IN THE KOLKATA DOCTOR’S MURDER CASE BY: ADONA MARIA JAMES

INDIAN JUDICIARY’S STANCE ON VIRTUAL HEARINGS AND SERVICE OF SUMMONS VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS UNDER THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 BY - GAUREEKA NATH

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2