INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

SEXUAL HARRASHMENT BY - SAMBRIDHI SRIVASTAVA

Authors: SAMBRIDHI SRIVASTAVA

Registration ID: 109213 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9213

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: sambridhisrivastava1119@gmail.com

Page No: 07 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/03.2025-51219452/SEXUAL HARRASHMENT

CHILD: A COMPETENT WITNESS BY - RITIKA SINGH

Authors: RITIKA SINGH

Registration ID: 109212 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9212

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: singhritika284@gmail.com

Page No: 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2025-15947391/CHILD: A COMPETENT WITNESS

PILOTING THE PERILS AND PROSPECTS OF AI INCORPORATION IN THE INDIAN JUDICIARY: A REALIST PERSPECTIVE BY - SAURABH DOBRIYAL

Authors: SAURABH DOBRIYAL

Registration ID: 109211 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9211

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: SAURABHDOBRIYAL50@GMAIL.COM

Page No: 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2025-44748461/PILOTING THE PERILS AND PROSPECTS OF AI INCORPORAT

DETECTION OF TOMATO DISEASES AND PESTS USING AN ENHANCED YOLOV3 CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK BY - PAWAN KUMAR & DR. SANJAY BANARJEE

Authors: PAWAN KUMAR & DR. SANJAY BANARJEE

Registration ID: 109209 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9209 & IJLRA9210

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: p.857@myyahoo.com & s2131950@gmail.com

Page No: 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2025-36581616/DETECTION OF TOMATO DISEASES AND PESTS USING AN EN

REGULATING ONLINE SALE OF MEDICINES BY - ANU MARIA

Authors: ANU MARIA

Registration ID: 109208 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9208

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: anumaria303@gmail.com

Page No: 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2025-18714418/REGULATING ONLINE SALE OF MEDICINES

FRANCHISEE AGREEMENT: AN ANALYSES AUTHORED BY - DEEP KAPADIA

Authors: DEEP KAPADIA

Registration ID: 109207 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9207

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: kapadia.deep@gmail.com

Page No: 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2025-93648433/FRANCHISEE AGREEMENT: AN ANALYSES AUTHORED

AN IN-DEPTH EXAMINATION OF STUDENT WELFARE SCHEMES: IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE, WELL-BEING, AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS BY - KARAN JETHVA

Authors: KARAN JETHVA

Registration ID: 109206 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9206

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: niteshsaini5977@gmail.com

Page No: 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2025-17882818/AN IN-DEPTH EXAMINATION OF STUDENT WELFARE SCHEMES

THE RISE OF AI JUDGES: AI AS A REPLACEMENT OF THE INDIAN JUDICIARY BY - NITESH SAINI

Authors: NITESH SAINI

Registration ID: 109205 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9205

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: niteshsaini5977@gmail.com

Page No: 07 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2025-18526365/THE RISE OF AI JUDGES: AI AS A REPLACEMENT OF THE

GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN IN INDIA BY - MS. ITY VERMA & DR. RAJ KUMAR

Authors: MS. ITY VERMA & DR. RAJ KUMAR

Registration ID: 109203 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9203 & IJLRA9204

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: premchandra1979@gmail.com & premchandra1979@gmail.com

Page No: 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2025-61294288/GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN IN INDIA

MAINTENANCE FOR WIVES UNDER SECTION 125 CRPC: JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVES ON ENTITLEMENT, PROCEDURAL NUANCES AND SOCIAL JUSTICE BY - PROF. (DR.) K. SITA MANIKYAM & K.BHARATH CHANDRA

Authors: PROF. (DR.) K. SITA MANIKYAM & K.BHARATH CHANDRA

Registration ID: 109201 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA9201 & IJLRA9202

Year: Feb-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: judgebharathchandra@gmail.com & bharathchandra2011@gmail.com

Page No: 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/02.2025-63583635/MAINTENANCE FOR WIVES UNDER SECTION 125 CRPC: JUDI

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] 3^rd semester student of LL.M. (Human Rights),School of Legal Studies, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University,Lucknow)

[2]The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023,India,available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/20062 (last visited on February 26,2025)

[3] The Juvenile Justice(Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015, India, available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2148 (last visited on February 26,2025)

[4] The Indian Evidence Act 1872,India,available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15351/1/iea_1872.pdf (last visited on February 26,2025)

[5] The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, India, available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/20063 (last visited on February 26,2025)

[13] Suryanarayana vs State of Karnataka,(2001) 9 SCC 129

[1] Bell, F., Bennett Moses, L., Legg, M., Silove, J., & Zalnieriute, M. (2023). AI decision-making and the courts: A guide for judges, tribunal members and court administrators. Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4162985

[2] Kumar Singh, A., & Kushwaha, A. (2024). Unmasking the transformative impact: Artificial intelligence in India's judiciary system. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22821.31205/1

[3] Leiter, B. (2008). American legal realism. In The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia (Vol. 1, pp. 34-43). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690116.ch3

[4] Angelosanto, M. (2023). Legal realism and the predictability of judicial decisions. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 2(3), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.2.3.2

[5] Lopes, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making: Evaluating the role of AI in debiasing. TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis, 33, 28-33. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.33.1.28

[6] Ejjami, R. (2024). AI-driven justice: Evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence on legal systems. International Journal of Future Management Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.23969

[7] N., S. (2023). Artificial intelligences effects on the legal sector transforming legal practice. II, 1-20.

[8] Lopes, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making: Evaluating the role of AI in debiasing. TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis, 33, 28-33. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.33.1.28

[9] Kolade-Faseyi, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the Nigerian legal profession. Achievers University Law Journal, 1, 161-175. Retrieved from https://www.aulawjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/9.-AULJ-full-Text-PRINT-READY-161-175.pdf

[10] Bell, F., Bennett Moses, L., Legg, M., Silove, J., & Zalnieriute, M. (2023). AI decision-making and the courts: A guide for judges, tribunal members and court administrators. Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4162985

[11] Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Wang, V., & Floridi, L. (2021). The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: An analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI & Society, 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2.

[12] Kaur, N., & Kaur, M. (2024). Role of artificial intelligence in the Indian courts. International Journal of Law, Policy and Social Review, 6(1), 17-20. Retrieved from https://www.lawjournals.net.

[13] Over 3.5 crore cases pending across courts in India, little change in numbers since 2014. (2019, November 27). The Wire. Retrieved from https://thewire.in/law/pending-court-cases

[14] Mercan, G., & Selçuk, Z. V. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) activities in legal practices. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 9, 131-145.

[15] Vinay, S., & Pub, Iaeme. (2024). Natural language processing for legal documentation in Indian languages. International Journal of Scientific Research, 1(1), 1-11.

[16] Tamanaha, B. Z. (2008). Understanding legal realism. St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-0133. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1127178 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1127178

[17] Capurso, T. J. (1998). How judges judge: Theories on judicial decision making. University of Baltimore Law Forum, 29(1), Article 2. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol29/iss1/2

[18] Re, R. M., & Solow-Niederman, A. (2019). Developing artificially intelligent justice. Stanford Technology Law Review, 22, 242-265.

[19] Benneh Mensah, G. (2023). Artificial intelligence and ethics: A comprehensive review of bias mitigation, transparency, and accountability in AI systems. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23381.19685/1

[20] Sourdin, T., & Cornes, R. (2018). Do judges need to be human? The implications of technology for responsive judging. In Artificial Intelligence and the Law: Towards Responsible AI (pp. 61-76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1023-2_4

[21] Krishnan, J. K., et al. (2014). Grappling at the grassroots: Access to justice in India’s lower tier. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 27, 151.

[22] Zafar, A. (2024). Balancing the scale: Navigating ethical and practical challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) integration in legal practices. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4, 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00121-8

[23] Legal Futures. (2022, June 16). Using artificial intelligence in the legal profession. Legal Futures. Retrieved from https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/using-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-profession

[24] Min, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and bias: Challenges, implications, and remedies. Journal of Social Research, 3808, Retrieved from http://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr

[25] Ferrer, X., van Nuenen, T., Such, J. M., Coté, M., & Criado, N. (2021). Bias and discrimination in AI: A cross-disciplinary perspective. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 40(2), 72–80

[26] Oluwaseyi, J., & Olaoye, G. (2024). Addressing biases and implications in privacy-preserving AI for industrial IoT, ensuring fairness and accountability.

[27] Ferrara, E. (2023). Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: A brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies

[28] Kumar, S., et al. (2024). Opportunities and challenges in data-centric AI. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3369417

[29] Winter, C. K. (2022). The challenges of artificial judicial decision-making for liberal democracy. In P. Bystranowski, B. Janik, & M. Próchnicki (Eds.), Judicial decision-making: Economic analysis of law in European legal scholarship (Vol. 14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11744-2_9

[31] Felzmann, H., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., & et al. (2020). Towards transparency by design for artificial intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3333–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4

[32] Osasona, F., Amoo, O., Atadoga, A., Abrahams, T., Farayola, O., & Ayinla, B. (2024). Reviewing the ethical implications of AI in decision making processes. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(2), 322-335. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.773

[33] Greenstein, S. (2022). Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(3), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4

[34] Kabir, M. S., & Nazmul Alam, M. (2023). The role of AI technology for legal research and decision making. Journal Title, Volume(Issue), 2395-0056. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372790308_The_Role_of_AI_Technology_for_Legal_Research_and_Decision_Making

[35] Oñati Socio-Legal Series. (2022). The ethics of Artificial Intelligence: An analysis of ethical frameworks disciplining AI in justice and other contexts of application. Volume 12(3), 614–653.

[36]ROSS Intelligence. (2017). ROSS Intelligence & Artificial Intelligence in Legal Research (Report No. A0280). Published: January 2017.

[37] Casey, A. J., & Niblett, A. (2020). Will Robot Judges Change Litigation and Settlement Outcomes? MIT Computational Law Report. Retrieved from https://law.mit.edu/pub/willrobotjudgeschangelitigationandsettlementoutcomes

[38] Xu, Z. (2021). Human judges in the era of artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 36(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.2013652.

[40] UNESCO. (2023). Global toolkit on AI and the rule of law for the judiciary (Document code: CI/DIT/2023/AIRoL/01). Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377742

[41] Balasubramaniam, N., Kauppinen, M., Rannisto, A., Hiekkanen, K., & Kujala, S. (2023). Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements. Information and Software Technology, 159, 107197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107197

[42] Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L., & Janowski, T. (2020). Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37, 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493

[43] Alvarez, J. M., Colmenarejo, A. B., Elobaid, A., et al. (2024). Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09746-w

[44] Gorny, P., Groos, E., & Strobel, C. (2024). Do personalized AI predictions change subsequent decision-outcomes? The impact of human oversight. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381116895_Do_Personalized_AI_Predictions_Change_Subsequent_Decision-Outcomes_The_Impact_of_Human_Oversight

[45] yan, M., & Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: Clarifying their content and normative implications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 19(1), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-12-2019-0138

[46] Machado, H., Silva, S., & Neiva, L. (2023). Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: A scoping review. AI Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00387-1

^{^[3]} Desai, C. (2016). Online pharmacies: a boon or bane?. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 48(6), 615. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.194865

^{^[4]} Para 5, The Tamil Nadu Chemists and Druggists Association v Union of India, 2018 SCC OnLine Mad 3515 : (2019) 1 CTC 548

^{^[5]} Power of Central Government to make rules (1) The Central Government may after consultation with or on the recommendation of the Board and after previous publication by notification in the official gazette, make rules for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of this chapter:

Provided that consultation with the Board may be dispensed with if the Central Government is of opinion that circumstances have arisen which render it necessary to make rules without such consultation, but in such a case the Board shall be consulted within six months of the making of the rules and the Central Government shall take into consideration any suggestions which the Board may make in relation to the amendment of the said rules.

^{^[8]} Condition of licences, Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945

^{^[9]} Labelling of medicines, Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945

^{^[13]} Documents or Information to be enclosed by the applicant: (i) A copy of identity and address proof of the applicant, any one of the followings: valid passport, voter ID card, valid permanent driving license, adhaar card; (ii) Constitution details of the applicant; whether proprietorship or partnership or limited liability partnership or company; Details of mode of helpline facility for counselling the patient or his representative with respect to drug usage, its method of administration, warnings, contra-indications and any other information relating to the drugs sold through e-pharmacy; (iii) any other relevant information which may be required for the purpose of verifying the correctness of the statements made by the applicant, if any;” (Form 18AA, Draft E-Pharmacy Rules 2018)

[1] Research Scholar, School of Law, IEC University, HP.

[2] Assistant Professor, School of Law, IEC University, HP.

[3] Rajvala, Roll of cultural factors in women empowerment, International Journal in Management and Social Science Volume 11 Issue 03, 2023 I https://ijmr.net.in/current/2023/March%2C-2023/5QWzIk7Lq8Nva49.pdf

[4] Olayat Tabasum Niroo, Helen Crompton, Women’s Empowerment Through Learning Using Technology, Asian Journal of Distance Education (AsianJDE), Vol.17, Issue, 2, 2022. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1373932.pdf

[1] Principal, Dr. B.R. AMBEDKAR COLLEGE OF LAW ANDHRA UNIVERSITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

[2] Research Scholar, Dr. B.R. AMBEDKAR COLLEGE OF LAW ANDHRA UNIVERSITY & Judicial Magistrate I Class, Kanigiri, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh.

[5] Chaturbhuj v. Sita Bai AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 530

[7] Sunita Kachwaha and others Vs Anil Kachwaha AIR 2015 SC 554 : (2014) 16 SCC 715

[10] Dr B. Vishnu Janardhan Vs B. Supraja (minor represented by her mother Smt Vijayasree and another) 1996 SCC online AP 1304

[11] Vijaya Kumar Prasad Vs State of Bihar and others AIR 2004 SC 2123.

[12] Badri Prasad Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation 1978 (3) SCC 527: AIR 1978 SC 1557

[13] Badshah Vs Sou Urmila Badshah Godse and Another 2014 (1) SCC 188: AIR 2014 SC 869.

[14] A.Dinohamy Vs W. L.Balahamy AIR 1927 PC 185.

[15] Mohabbat Ali Khan Vs Muhammad Ibrahim Khan and others AIR 1929 PC 135

[16] Tulsa and others Vs Durghatiya and others 2008(4) SCC 520 : AIR 2008 SC 1193

[18] Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs Bidyut Prava Dixit and another 1999(7) SCC 675: AIR 1999 SC 3348.

[19] Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs Bidyut Prava Dixit and another 1999(7) SCC 675: AIR 1999 SC 3348.

[20] Jitendranath Das Vs Minati Das 2004 SCC online Calcutta 112.

[21] Kamala Vs M.R. Mohan Kumar AIR 2019 SC (Criminal) 61.

[22] Pyla Mutylamma @ Satyavathi Vs Pyla Suri Demudu and Another 2011 (12) SCC 189.

[23] A.A.Balasundaram Vs A. Vijaya Kumari and another 1990 SCC online AP 155

[24] Jitendranath Das Vs Minati Das 2004 SCC online Calcutta 112.

[27] Gurmit Kaur Vs Surjit Singh @ Jeet Singh (1996) 1 SCC 39: AIR online 1995 SC 598.

[28] Dr. Swapan Kumar Banerjee v. State of WB AIR 2020 SC (CRIMINAL) 316

[29] Vinita Devangan Vs Rakesh Kumar Devangan AIR 2010(NOC) 117(CHH).

[30] Nand Lal Misra Vs Kanhaiya Lal Misra AIR 1960 SC 882.

[31] Vijaya Kumar Prasad Vs State of Bihar and others AIR 2004 SC 2123

[32] Chitti Prasadarao Vs Chitti Asiri Polamma 1993 SCC OnLine AP 327: 1993 (1) ALT (Cri.) 421.

[33] Balram Argidda Vs A. Chandramma and Another 1997 Cri.L.J. 1305 (AP).

[34] Balram Argidda Vs A. Chandramma and Another 1997 Cri.L.J. 1305 (AP).

[35] Bhuwan Mohan Singh Vs Meena AIR 2014 SC 2875.

[36] Reema Sulkan Vs Sumar Singh Sulkan AIR 2018 SC (Crl) 1384.

[37] Shamima Farooqui Vs Shahid Khan AIR 2015 SC 2025.

[40] AIR 2021 SC 569 : 2020 SCC OnLine SC 903 39

[42] Gangabai Vs Shriram @ Shrikishan 1991 Cri.L.J., 2018.

[43] Sk Khaja Mohideen v. Sk Parveen 2020 CRI.L.J. 3454: AIRONLINE 2019 AP 85

[44] Saygobai Vs Chueeru Bajrangi AIR 2011 SC 1557: (2010) 13 SCC 762.

[45] Siraj mohmedkhan Janmohamadkhan v. Hafizunnisa Yasinkhan AIR 1981 SC 1972

SEXUAL HARRASHMENT BY - SAMBRIDHI SRIVASTAVA

CHILD: A COMPETENT WITNESS BY - RITIKA SINGH

PILOTING THE PERILS AND PROSPECTS OF AI INCORPORATION IN THE INDIAN JUDICIARY: A REALIST PERSPECTIVE BY - SAURABH DOBRIYAL

DETECTION OF TOMATO DISEASES AND PESTS USING AN ENHANCED YOLOV3 CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK BY - PAWAN KUMAR & DR. SANJAY BANARJEE

REGULATING ONLINE SALE OF MEDICINES BY - ANU MARIA

FRANCHISEE AGREEMENT: AN ANALYSES AUTHORED BY - DEEP KAPADIA

AN IN-DEPTH EXAMINATION OF STUDENT WELFARE SCHEMES: IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE, WELL-BEING, AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS BY - KARAN JETHVA

THE RISE OF AI JUDGES: AI AS A REPLACEMENT OF THE INDIAN JUDICIARY BY - NITESH SAINI

GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN IN INDIA BY - MS. ITY VERMA & DR. RAJ KUMAR

MAINTENANCE FOR WIVES UNDER SECTION 125 CRPC: JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVES ON ENTITLEMENT, PROCEDURAL NUANCES AND SOCIAL JUSTICE BY - PROF. (DR.) K. SITA MANIKYAM & K.BHARATH CHANDRA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2