INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF PATENT PORTFOLIOS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS BY - AISHWARYA PANDEY

Authors: AISHWARYA PANDEY

Registration ID: 108966 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8966

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: reachaishwaryap@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-85197612/STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF PATENT PORTFOLIOS: CHALLEN

THE LAW OF COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING AND FREEDOM OF COMMERCIAL SPEECH: A LEGAL AND SOCIAL WORK PERSPECTIVE BY - ARYAN SINGH

Authors: ARYAN SINGH

Registration ID: 108965 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8965

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aryan.rlac@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-65256718/THE LAW OF COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING AND FREEDOM OF

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRE-PACKAGED INSOLVENCY FOR MSMES IN INDIA BY - NEETI GOYAL

Authors: NEETI GOYAL

Registration ID: 108964 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8964

Year : Nov-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: neetigoyal.30@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-94856856/CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRE-PACKAGED INSOLVENCY FOR M

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WRIT JURISDICTION IN THE UK AND INDIA VIS-À-VIS PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT BY - AVANISH KUMAR SONKAR & SAKSHI SINGH

Authors: AVANISH KUMAR SONKAR & SAKSHI SINGH

Registration ID: 108962 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8962 & IJLRA8963

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: as06051999@gmail.com & sakshi270699@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-45567227/A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WRIT JURISDICTION IN THE UK

LEGAL CHALLENGES OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS BY - AJIT RAJU KAMBLE & SHUBHAM BALASAHEB AUTE

Authors: AJIT RAJU KAMBLE & SHUBHAM BALASAHEB AUTE

Registration ID: 108960 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8960 & IJLRA8961

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: beingajitkamble@gmail.com & shubhamaute0712@gmail.com

Page No : 23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-73148537/LEGAL CHALLENGES OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOL

FEDERALISM UNDER SIEGE: ANALYZING THE ENDORSEMENT OF ARTICLE 370 ABROGATION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA BY - SIA SETHI

Authors: SIA SETHI

Registration ID: 108959 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8959

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: 22jgls-svsethi@jgu.edu.in

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-34793457/FEDERALISM UNDER SIEGE: ANALYZING THE ENDORSEMENT

ROLE OF NGOS AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN EXPANDING LEGAL AIDS BY - PRANSHUL JAISWAL

Authors: PRANSHUL JAISWAL

Registration ID: 108958 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8958

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: pranshuljaiswal2110@gmail.com

Page No : 08 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-57211966/ROLE OF NGOS AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN EXPANDING LEGAL

SURVEILLANCE OF CYBER SECURITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY - SOHAIR AHMED SHAIKH

Authors: SOHAIR AHMED SHAIKH

Registration ID: 108957 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8957

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shaikhsohair03@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-84763451/SURVEILLANCE OF CYBER SECURITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS

SAFEGUARDING MINORITY RIGHTS: CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS, JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS, AND THEIR SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT IN INDIA BY - AGREEMA DOODRAJ

Authors: AGREEMA DOODRAJ

Registration ID: 108956 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8956

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: agreemadoodraj@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-71466729/SAFEGUARDING MINORITY RIGHTS: CONSTITUTIONAL PROVI

THE EXPANSION AND REDEFINATION OF JUSTICE THROUGH ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - ANKITA KUMARI & PRIYANSHU LUCKY

Authors: ANKITA KUMARI & PRIYANSHU LUCKY

Registration ID: 108954 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8954 & IJLRA8955

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: 2716@cnlu.ac.in & 2755@cnlu.ac.in

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-18219739/THE EXPANSION AND REDEFINATION OF JUSTICE THROUGH

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Research Scholar, Faculty of Law, University of Lucknow

^{^[2]} Burdon J. IP Portfolio Management: Negotiating the Information Labyrinth. In Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices MIHR: Oxford, U.K., and PIPRA: Davis, U.S.A. (2007).

^{^[3]} Kevin G. Rivette & David Kline, Rembrandts In the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value Of Patents (2000).

^{^[4]}Stephen A. Merrill, Richard C. Levin & Mark B. Myers A Patent System for The 21st Century, 30 (2004).

^{^[5]}Mark A. Lemley, Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office, 95 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1495, 1507 (2001).

^{^[6]} Robert P. Merges & Richard R. Nelson, On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, 90 Colum. L. Rev. 839 (1990).

^{^[7]} Richard C. Levin, A New Look at the Patent System, 76 Am. Econ. Rev. at 199, 201(1986).

^{^[9]} Mark A. Lemley, Reconceiving Patents in the Age of Venture Capital, 4J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 137, 138 (2000).

^{^[10]} John Markoff, Advanced Micro Narrows Gap in Race for New Chip, N.Y. Times, at C5, (Aug. 17, 2004).

^{^[11]} All-in-One Pills for Heart Disease, Harv. Health Letter, 3(2004).

^{^[12]} John P. Sumner & Steven W. Lundberg, Software Patents: Are They Here to Stay? Computer Law. (1991).

^{^[13]} John R. Allison & Mark A. Lemley, The Growing Complexity of the United States Patent System, 82 B.U. L. REV. 77, 96-97 (2002).

^{^[14]} Gideon Parchomovsky; R. Polk Wagner, Patent Portfolios, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1 (2005).

^{^[18]} Peter C. Grindley & David J. Teece, Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics, 39 Cal. Mgmt. Rev., Winter, 8, 9, (1997).

^{^[19]} Donna J. Kelley & Mark P. Rice, Leveraging the Value of Proprietary Technologies, J. Small Bus. Mgmt. at 1, 9-10 (2002).

^{^[20]} Benjamin Pimentel, Inventors Patent Ideas to Pre-Empt Their Rivals; Companies Then Must Buy Rights to the Devices, S.F. Chron. (2003).

^{^[21]} George L. Priest & Benjamin Klein, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation,13J. Legal Stud. 1, 15-16 & fig.6 (1984).

^{^[23]} Rajiv P. Patel, Patent Portfolio Strategy for Start-Up Companies: A Primer, Pat. Strategy & Mgmt., 1 (2002).

^{^[25]} Robert P. Merges, As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform, 14 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 577, 58990 (1999).

^{^[26]} The U. S. Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. Sec 112 (2000).

^{^[27]} Thomas A. Stewart, 3M Fights Back, FORTUNE, (Feb. 1996) http://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1996/02/05/207343/index.html.

^{^[28]} Craig Allen Nard, Process Considerations in the Age of Markman and Mantras, U. ILL. L. REV. 355, 357 (2001).

^{^[29]} R. Polk Wagner & Lee Petherbridge, Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Performance, 152 U. PA. L. REV. 1105, 1163-70 (2004).

^{^[30]} Harris A. Pitlick, The Mutation on the Description Requirement Gene, 80 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 209, 222 (1998).

^{^[32]} Eric W. Pfeiffer, Mine Games: Companies Are Coining Intellectual Property, FORBES (24 Jun. 2002),

^{^[36]} Carl Shapiro, Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, in 1 Innovation Policy and The Economy 119 (2001).

^{^[37]} Clarisa Long, Information Costs in Patent and Copyright, 90 VA. L. REV. 465, 474-82 (2004).

^{^[39]} Michael A. Heller & Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research, 280 SC. 698, 699 (1998); see also: Arti K Rai, Fostering Cumulative Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry: The Role of Patents and Antitrust, 16 Berkeley Tech. LJ. 813, 831-38 (2001).

^{^[40]} Manny D. Pokotilow, Why Alternative Dispute Resolution Should Be Used for Intellectual Property Disputes, Intell. Prop. & Tech. L.J., (July 2004).

^{^[41]} Clayton M. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, 130 (1997).

^{^[42]}Jonathan M. Barnett, Private Protection of Patentable Goods, 25 CARDOZO L. REV. 1285, 1288 (2004); see also: Richard J. Rosen, Research and Development with Asymmetric Firm Sizes, 22 Rand J. Econ. 411, 419-21 (1991).

^{^[1]} Choudhry S., Khosla M., & Mehta P.B., ‘Locating Indian Constitutionalism’, in Sujit Choudhry et el, (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford: 2016), pp. 1-13.: With regards to the inclusion of writ jurisdiction in a constitution, it anticipates the need to address violations of fundamental rights that may arise in the future. It acknowledges that societal circumstances can change, and the legal system must have mechanisms in place to respond effectively to new challenges and evolving values.

^{^[2]} Manohar Sujata V., ‘Right to Constitutional Remedy’, in T.K. Tope’s Constitutional Law of India (Eastern Book Company: 2010) pp. 376-378.

^{^[3]} Ibid.: this power is now vested in the High Court of Justice, under the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925.

^{^[4]} Ibid.: Sir Alladi Krishnaswamy Aiyar remarked: Our Constitution has gone further than any known Constitution in the direction of securing the effective and speedy enforcement of the rights guaranteed under it.

^{^[5]} Ibid.: Supreme Court exercises power of writs under Article 32 and High Courts exercise under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

^{^[6]} Mehta Bhanu, ‘The Rise of Judicial Sovereignty’ (2007) 18 Journal of Democracy pp. 70-83: In PIL cases, the Court relaxes the normal legal requirements of “standing” and “pleading,” which require that litigation be pressed by a directly affected party or parties, and instead allows anyone to approach it seeking correction of an alleged evil or injustice.

^{^[7]} Jackson Vicki C., ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies, in Michel Rosenfeld & Andras Sajo, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (2012), pp. 67-83.: There may be both ‘genetic’ forms of connections between systems, based on the influence one has on the development of another and ‘genealogical’ forms of connection, where one or more constitutional system(s) grew out of another, typically in countries emerging out of colonial relationships.

^{^[8]} Ibid.: Contextual Method seeks more elicit understanding of how particular paradigmatic social and political concerns shape or are reflected in the constitutional law.

^{^[9]} Scheppele K.L., ‘Aspirational and Aversive Constitutionalism: The Case for Studying Cross-Constitutional Influence Through Negative Models’, (2003) 1 (2) I•CON pp. 296-324: Aversive constitutionalism calls attention to the negative models that are prominent in constitution builders’ minds. Constitution builders may have only the vaguest sense of where they are going and how they should get there; more often, they have a clearer sense of what it is that they want to avoid. In this regard, the constitution makers of India had in their mind that they have to protect and enforce the fundamental rights effectively so for that they have to provide a wider ambit of writ jurisdiction unlike in the UK.

^{^[10]} Tushnet Mark, ‘Some reflections on method in comparative constitutional law’, in Sujit Choudhry, The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge University Press; 2012) pp 67-83: Expressivism is a different, perhaps even more comprehensive, version of contextualism. For an expressivist scholar, constitutional law – doctrines and institutional arrangements – are ways in which a nation goes about defining itself.

^{^[11]} Oza Prachi, ‘Comparative Study on Writ Jurisdiction in India and the UK’, (2022) 5 International Journal of Law Management & Humanities 839-850.

^{^[12]} Forsyth Christopher & Upadhayay Nitish, ‘The development of the Prerogative Remedies in England and India: The Student becomes the Master?’(2011) 23 National Review School of India Review 77-85.

^{^[13]} Hansaria, B.L., ‘Public Interest Litigation’ in Justice B L Hansaria’s Writ Jurisdiction (3rd) (Universal Law

Publishing Co.: 2004).

^{^[14]} Jenks Edward, ‘The Prerogative Writs in English Law’ (1923) 32 Yale Law Journal 523-534.

^{^[15]} Aggarwal, Adish, ‘Right to Constitutional Remedies’, in Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala’s Constitution of India (4 th) (Amish Publications: 2014) pp. 129-146.

^{^[17]} Wade H.W.R.& Forsyth C.F., ‘Prerogative Remedies’, in Administrative Law (Oxford Claredon Press: 1994) pp. 591-615.

^{^[18]} Ibid.: They are ‘prerogative’ because they were originally available only to the Crown and to the subject These writs were granted to ensure whether public authorities carried out their duties or not and whether the lower tribunals were functioning within their jurisdiction or not. These were essentially remedies for ensuring efficiency and maintaining order in the hierarchy of courts, commissions and authorities of all kinds

^{^[19]} Smith S.A. de., ‘The Prerogative Writs: Historical Origins’, in de Smith’s Judicial Review of Administrative Action (4th) (London Steven & Sons Limited: 1980) pp. 584- 595.: SA de Smith writes, that writs cannot be simply understood as they were originally issued only at the suit of the king, but which were later made available to the subject. He said this view cannot be accepted without a number of reservations. Prohibition and habeas corpus appear to have been issued on the application of subjects from the very first; and although writs of certiorari and mandamus were initially royal mandates issued for diverse purposes of government, the result of applications made by subjects. It is nevertheless true to say that when, ‘prerogative’ it was because they were conceived as being intimately connected with rights of the Crown.

^{^[21]} This shows the origin of writs as a tool of royal authority, used by the monarch to exercise discretionary powers and issue commands. It was the tool through which the king’s will was manifested.

^{^[22]} They further write that after 1938 their name was changed to prerogative orders again except for habeas corpus. The modern use of writ is yet another instance of conversion of the Crown’s legal armoury into remedies beneficial to the subject.

^{^[23]} Seervai H.M., ‘Right to Judicial Remedies’ in Constitutional Law of India (4th) Volume 2 (Universal Law Publishing Company: 1993) pp. 1449-1467.: Later on, this power of writs had been inherited by their successor High Courts. Continuing with these remedial mechanisms to provide remedy in case of violation of fundamental rights, the Constituent Assembly adopted the writ provision in the Constitution.

^{^[24]} Hansaria, B.L., ‘Historical Bacground: Article 226 and 227’ in Justice B L Hansaria’s Writ Jurisdiction (3rd) (Universal Law Publishing Co.: 2004) pp. 1-12.: as they were established by issue of Charter they were called as “Chartered High Courts”.

^{^[27]} Ibid.: Since “general declarations had not much unless there exited the will and means to enforce them, the Constituent Assembly showed the will, and provided the means, to enforce the fundamental rights conferred by the part III.

^{^[28]} So, it was not merely the imposition and intervention of British rule and their law that was the reason why India has these writs and writ jurisdiction today. The crucial and strong reason was the protection and enforcement of fundamental rights. It was the ideology and aim of the drafters of the Indian Constitution that made them include the concept of writs and give special powers to the Supreme Court and High Courts of India.

^{^[29]} Sinha, Govind Narayan, ‘Judiciary and Environment’in A comparative study of the environmental laws of India and the UK with special reference to their enforcement (University of Birmingham Research Archive: 2003) pp 160-203.

^{^[30]} Ibid.: The High Court has several remedies available to it to overturn a decision made unlawfully. These include quashing order (to quash the public authority’s decision), mandatory order (or a mandatory injunction, requiring the public authority to carry out its duties), prohibiting order (or a prohibitory injunction, restraining a public authority from. Continuing to act unlawfully) and a declaration (stating what the law is).

^{^[32]} R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Business Limited [1982] AC 617 as mentioned in Sinha, Govind Narayan, ‘Judiciary and Environment’ in A comparative study of the environmental laws of India and the UK with special reference to their enforcement (the University of Birmingham Research Archive: 2003) pp 160-203.: in which Lord Diplock said: “It would, in view be a grave lacuna in. our system of public law if a pressure group, like the federation, or even a single public spirited taxpayer, were prevented by the outdated technical rules of locus standi from bringing the matter to the attention to the court to vindicate the rule of law get the unlawful stopped.”

^{^[33]} R v Inspectorate of Pollution, ex parte Greenpeace Limited [1994] 4 AII ER 329 and R v Secretary OF State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte World Development. Movement Limited [1995] 1 WLR 386 as mentioned in Sinha, Govind Narayan, ‘Judiciary and Environment’ in A comparative study of the environmental laws of India and the UK with special reference to their enforcement (University of Birmingham Research Archive: 2003) pp. 160-203.

^{^[34]} Human Rights Act, 1998: The Bill of Rights was introduced in the UK Parliament in 2022 to replace the Human Rights Act, 1998 but it was scrapped in 2023 (see: https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3227 ). It would have changed or removed provisions of the HRA and introduced a large number of new measures including new permission stage. Requiring claimants to prove they have suffered significant disadvantage as a result of a breach of their rights before they can take their claim to court.

^{^[35]} R v N Somerset District Council, ex parte Garnett and R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Dixon as mentioned in Sinha, Govind Narayan, ‘Judiciary and Environment’ in A comparative study of the environmental laws of India and the UK with special reference to their enforcement (University of Birmingham Research Archive: 2003) pp 160-203

^{^[37]} R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Rose Theatre Co [1990] 1QB 504 (as mentioned in the work) as mentioned in Sinha, Govind Narayan, ‘Judiciary and Environment’ in A comparative study of the environmental laws of India and the UK with special reference to their enforcement (University of Birmingham Research Archive: 2003) pp 160-203.

^{^[38]} Singh, Sukhwinder, ‘Sentry Approach of Judiciary for the protection of Environmental Pollution in India: A Bird’s Eye View’ (2019) 11 Dehradun Law Review 13-21.

^{^[39]} Hansaria, B.L., ‘Public Interest Litigation’ in Justice B L Hansaria’s Writ Jurisdiction (3rd) (Universal Law Publishing Co.: 2004) pp 528-556.

^{^[41]} (2000) 6 SCC 213 as referred in Rao Mamta, ‘Dynamics and Trend of PIL in India’, in Public Interest Litigation Legal Aid and Lok Adalats (5th) (Eastern Book Company: 2018) pp163-191.: A person, therefore guilty of causing pollution has to pay damages for the restoration of the environment and ecology

^{^[42]} (1996) 5 SCC 647 as referred in Rao Mamta, ‘Dynamics and Trend of PIL in India’, in Public Interest Litigation Legal Aid and Lok Adalats (5th) (Eastern Book Company: 2018) pp163-191.

^{^[43]} Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P (1985) 2 SCC 431: “There was mining operation going in certain limestone quarries which causing environmental and ecological imbalance to the detriment of the welfare of the people Mussoorie hill ranges. SC considered balanced and resolved competing policies, priorities and issues of resources including the need for development, environmental conservation, preserving hills and protecting substantial business investments.

^{^[44]} (1986) 2 SCC 176 as referred in Rao Mamta, ‘Dynamics and Trend of PIL in India’, in Public Interest Litigation Legal Aid and Lok Adalats (5th) (Eastern Book Company: 2018) pp163-191.

^{^[45]} M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1988) 1 SCC 471 as referred in Rao Mamta, ‘Dynamics and Trend of PIL in India’, in Public Interest Litigation Legal Aid and Lok Adalats (5th) (Eastern Book Company: 2018) pp163-191: related to water pollution in the Ganga River, a writ petition was filed to draw the attention of the court towards the nuisance caused to the people by the pollution of the river Ganga. Even though there was government legislation imposing a duty on Central and State Boards under the Water (Prevention and Control) of Pollution Act, 1974, they were unable to take proper measures.

^{^[46]} Immediate action is to be taken by the Municipality to construct sufficient latrines and urinals for the poor. Directed that High Courts should grant stay under section 482 CrPC only in extraordinary circumstances as it stalled the proceeding taken to prosecute industrialists or other persons who pollute rivers. To take measures so that dead or half-burnt bodies are not thrown into the river

^{^[47]}Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (1996) 3 SCC 212: “The untreated industrial waste through chemical waste posing threat to the environment. The untreated water was allowed to flow out freely causing supply of water turning streams dark and dirty rendering it unfit for human consumption.” As referred in Rao Mamta, ‘Dynamics and Trend of PIL in India’, in Public Interest Litigation Legal Aid and Lok Adalats (5th) (Eastern Book Company: 2018) pp163-191.

^{^[49]} Pal Samaraditya, ‘Article 32’ in India’s Constitution Origins and Evolution Volume 3 (Lexis Nexis: 2015) 459- 498.

^{^[51]} Ibid.: With the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty in England, in general no executive action sanctioned by an Act of Parliament can be void by a Court. In addition, Parliament may also be able to jurisdiction of the Courts over certain matters. In India, however, t itself enshrines in Articles 32 and 226 the jurisdiction to issue writ of the prerogative remedies in the Supreme Court and the High Courts.

^{^[52]} Supra note 12: In England, this had not been the case, until the reforms of Order 53 were introduced, highlighting the ability of the drafters to take the English idea and mould it to the India constitution.

^{^[54]} Hirschl, Ran, ‘The Rise of Comparative Constitutional Law: Thoughts on Substance and Method’ (2008) 2 Indian Journal of Constitutional Law pp. 11-37.

^{^[55]} Watson, Alan, ‘Comparative Law and Legal Change’, (1978) 37 The Cambridge Law Journal pp. 33-336.

^{^[56]} Legrand P., ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, (1997) 4 Maastricht J. Euro. & Comp. L. pp. 111-124.

[1] Law of insolvency and bankruptcy – S. R. Myneni

[5] Insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016/liquidator/

[10] INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016/ INSOLVENCY PROCEEDING/

[11] INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016/INSOLVENCY PROCEEDING/

[14] INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016/ INSOVENCY PROCEEDING OF CORPORATE

[1] Press Information Bureau (2021) Impact of Abrogation of Article 370 On J&K, Ministry of Home Affairs. Available at: https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1694784 (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[2] Instrument of Accession of Jammu and Kashmir State, Oct. 26, 1947, available at https://cjp.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/instrument_of_accession_of_jammu_and_kashmir_state.pdf (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[3] Phull, R. (2020) Instruments of accession, Times of India Blog. Available at: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/insideoutside/instruments-of-accession-23183/ (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[5] Sein, A. and Judge, A. (no date) C.L. Agrawal Memorial Lecture Accession of Kashmir— Historical & Legal Perspective, Eastern Book Company - Practical Lawyer. Available at: https://www.ebc-india.com/lawyer/articles/96v4a2.htm (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[8] Setalvad, T. (2019) Understanding article 370, CJP. Available at: https://cjp.org.in/article-370-and-the-hindu-right/ (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[11] Deva, Z. (2019) The constitutional siege on Article 370, Verfassungsblog. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/the-constitutional-siege-on-article-370/ (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[12] Supreme Court of India, (Dec. 11, 2023) In re Article 370 of the Constitution, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1099 of 2019 (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[13] The Jammu & Kashmir Constituent Assembly: A brief history (2023) Constitution of India. Available at: https://www.constitutionofindia.net/blog/the-jammu-kashmir-constituent-assembly/ (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[14] Preston, C. (2024) Jammu and Kashmir National Conference, Encyclopædia Britannica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Jammu-and-Kashmir-National-Conference (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[18] A.G. Noorani (2011) Negotiating the Delhi Agreement: 1952, Academic.oup.com. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/book/26414/chapter-abstract/194791852?redirectedFrom=fulltext (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[20] From the archives: The Hindu’s report on the president’s order in J&K, 1954 (2019) The Hindu. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/from-the-archives-the-hindus-report-on-the-presidents-order-in-jk-1954/article61587383.ece (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[21] Tewari , M., Bhushan, P. and Yadav, B. (2018) Should Article 35A be scrapped?, The Hindu. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/should-article-35a-be-scrapped/article24763536.ece (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[24] Ashiq, P. (2023) Article 370 Verdict: A changed political landscape in J&K, The Hindu. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/a-changed-political-landscape-in-jk/article67655552.ece (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[26] Abrogation of Article 370: Day 4: J&K Constituent Assembly made art. 370 permanent in the state’s Constitution (2023) Supreme Court Observer. Available at: https://www.scobserver.in/reports/abrogation-of-article-370-day-4-jk-constituent-assembly-made-art-370-permanent-in-the-states-constitution/ (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[27] India. Constituent Assembly Debates, Vol. VII (Nov. 4, 1948), available at https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/762996/1/cad_04-11-1948.pdf (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[29] Press Release, Cabinet Approves Extension of President’s Rule in Jammu & Kashmir for Six Months with Effect from 3rd July, 2019, (June 12, 2019), Press Information Bureau, Gov't of India. https://www.pmindia.gov.in/en/news_updates/cabinet-approves-extension-of-presidents-rule-in-jk-for-six-months-with-effect-from-3rd-july-2019/ (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[30] Nirala, S. (2018) Jammu & Kashmir under governor’s rule for Eighth Time, India Today. Available at: https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/jammu-kashmir-under-governor-s-rule-for-eighth-time-1265259-2018-06-20 (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[33] Maqbool Damnoo vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir 1972 AIR 963, 1972 SCR (2)1014

[35] Jammu & Kashmir: Issues Around State, Civilsdaily, https://www.civilsdaily.com/story/jk-issues-around-state/ (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[36] Mahajan, K. The abrogation of Article 370 and bifurcation of Jammu. Available at: https://ijcl.nalsar.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/9IndianJConstL106_Mahajan.pdf (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[38] The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019, PRS India, https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-jammu-and-kashmir-reorganisation-bill-2019 (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[40] Rajagopal, K. (2021) Explained: President’s order scraps its predecessor and amends Article 370, The Hindu. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/explained-presidents-order-scraps-its-predecessor-and-amends-article-370/article61587647.ece (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[44] Sebastian, M. and Hrishikesh, S. (2023) Article 370: India Supreme Court upholds repeal of Kashmir’s special status, BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-67634689 (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[46] Tikkanen, A. (2024) Federalism, Encyclopædia Britannica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/federalism (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[47] Outline of American Government: Chapter 3. The Constitution, W.W. Norton & Company, https://wwnorton.com/college/polisci/american-government12/brief/ch/03/outline.aspx (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[50] Levinson , J., Wilson, C. and Haas, R. (2020) 50 days of protest in Portland. A violent police response. this is how we got here., opb. Available at: https://www.opb.org/news/article/police-violence-portland-protest-federal-officers/ (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[51] Tebor, C. (2021) Was Trump’s deployment of federal officers to Portland ... Available at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1083&context=honors_theses (Accessed: 01 November 2024).

[52] U.S. Senate, Visit the Capitol, https://www.visitthecapitol.gov/education-resource/us-senate (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[53] Pack the Union: A Proposal to Admit New States for the Purpose of Amending the Constitution to Ensure Equal Representation, 133 Harv. L. Rev. 1234 (2020), https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-133/pack-the-union-a-proposal-to-admit-new-states-for-the-purpose-of-amending-the-constitution-to-ensure-equal-representation/ (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[54] GAHATRAJ, D. (2022) Quasi federal. Available at: https://www.iilsindia.com/study-material/810726_1618671525.pdf (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[57] Constitution of India, Supreme Court of India, https://www.sci.gov.in/constitution/ (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[58] Concurrent Power of Legislation under List III of the Indian Constitution, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, https://legalaffairs.gov.in/sites/default/files/Concurrent%20Power%20of%20Legislation%20under%20List%20III%20of%20the%20Indian%20Constitution.pdf (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[59] Malik, A. (2019) Changing dimensions of federalism in India. Available at: https://ili.ac.in/pdf/mam.pdf (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[61] Kumar, B.A. (2023) Does a ‘union territory’ fall under word ‘state’ of Article 131 for invoking original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court: A legal analysis, SCC Times. Available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/01/28/does-a-union-territory-fall-under-word-state-of-article-131-for-invoking-original-jurisdiction-of-the-supreme-court-a-legal-analysis/ (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[62] Muralidharan, V. (2024) Article 370 Judgment: A betrayal of federal values, The India Forum. Available at: https://www.theindiaforum.in/politics/article-370-judgment-betrayal-federal-values (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[63] Khaund, A.K. (2021) National emergency: A comparative analysis of emergency laws in India, U.S.A. and Germany, Aequitas Victoria. Available at: https://www.aequivic.in/post/aijacla-national-emergency-a-comparative-analysis-of-emergency-laws-in-india-u-s-a-and-germany-3 (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[64] S.R. Bommai vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir 1994 AIR 1918, 1994 SCC (3) 1

[65] Ghosh, A. (2023) The paradox of ‘centralised federalism’: An analysis of the challenges to India’s Federal Design, orfonline.org. Available at: https://www.orfonline.org/research/the-paradox-of-centralised-federalism-an-analysis-of-the-challenges-to-india-s-federal-design (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[66] Kesavananda Bharathi vs. State of Kerala AIR 1973 SUPREME COURT 1461

[68] Aney, S. and Anturkar, A. (2021) Recasting of Federal Structure of the Indian constitution, SCC Times. Available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/04/02/indian-constitution/ (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[71] Goel, D. (2019) Federalism in India and USA: A comparative analysis. Available at: https://ijirl.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/FEDERALISM-IN-INDIA-AND-USA-A-COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS.pdf (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[72] Sahoo, N. (2023) Statehood or autonomy: Rethinking governance in India’s capital, orfonline.org. Available at: https://www.orfonline.org/research/statehood-or-autonomy-rethinking-governance-in-india-s-capital (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[73] Constituent Assembly Debates: Volume 10, December 12, 1948, Lok Sabha Secretariat, https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/762994/1/cad_10-12-1948.pdf (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[74] State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Union of India AIRONLINE 2018 SC 1029

[77] Heslop, A. (2024) Encyclopædia Britannica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-system/Federal-systems (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[78] Iwanek, K. (2020) Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir Are India’s Newest Union Territories. What Does That Mean in Practice?, – The Diplomat. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/what-exactly-does-union-territory-status-in-the-republic-of-india-mean/ (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[82] Bhattacharjee, G. (2016) Other northeastern states: Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram, and Arunachal Pradesh, OUP Academic. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/book/10382/chapter-abstract/158184136?redirectedFrom=fulltext (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[89] Sengupta, A. (2023) How the bilingual Bombay State was split into Gujarat and Maharashtra, The Indian Express. Available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-history/bilingual-bombay-state-split-gujarat-maharashtra-8585690/ (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[97] Article 370: What happened with kashmir and why it matters (2019) BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-49234708 (Accessed: 02 November 2024).

[98] Daly, T. (2019) Constitutional redesign of the federal balance: India and Article 370 - IACL-IADC Blog, IACL. Available at: https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/2019-posts/2019/11/28/constitutional-redesign-of-the-federal-balance-india-and-article-370 (Accessed: 03 November 2024).

[1] Human Rights and the Digital Age:
U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Report on the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/27/37 (June 30, 2014), https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/opinion/pages/opinionindex.aspx.

[2] General Cybercrime Threats and Legal Frameworks:
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Cybersecurity Framework, NIST (last visited Dec. 26, 2024), https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework.

[3] Cybercrime Definition:
Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, Cybersecurity: What is Cybersecurity? CISA (last visited Dec. 26, 2024), https://www.cisa.gov

[5] Section 66 (Hacking and Unauthorized Access):
Indian Penal Code (IPC), No. 45 of 1860, § 66, (India), https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2267?view_type=advanced&sam_handle=123456789/1362.

[6] Section 469 (Forgery of Digital Documents):
Indian Penal Code (IPC), No. 45 of 1860, § 469, (India), https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2267?view_type=advanced&sam_handle=123456789/1362.

[8] Personal Data Protection Bill (Proposed):
India, Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, Bill No. 373 of 2019, § 1, 2019, https://www.prsindia.org/billtrack/personal-data-protection-bill-2019.

[9] Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR):
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217 A (III), U.N. GAOR, 3rd Sess., U.N. Doc. A/810, at 71 (Dec. 10, 1948), https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

[10] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), U.N. GAOR, 21st Sess., U.N. Doc. A/6316 (Dec. 16, 1966), https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.

[1]Faizan Mustafa, The Constitution on Minority Rights, The Hindu (Dec. 31, 2024)

[3] D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (27th ed. 2024).

[4] Dr. Iqtidar Karamat Cheema, Constitutional and Legal Challenges Faced by Religious Minorities in India, U.S. COMM'N ON INT'L RELIGIOUS FREEDOM (Feb. 2017)

[5] Rangnath Mishra Commission Report. Report of the National Commission for Religious and Linguistic Minorities, Government of India, 2007

[6] Sushil Kumar Singh, Constitutional Protection of Minority Rights in India: Legal and Social Perspectives (Dec. 2024)

[7] D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (27th ed. 2024).

[13] Sushil Kumar Singh, Constitutional Protection of Minority Rights in India: Legal and Social Perspectives (Dec. 2024)

[15] S.P. Sathe, Judicial Activism: The Indian Experience, 6 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol’y 29 (2001).

[16] Sushil Kumar Singh, Constitutional Protection of Minority Rights in India: Legal and Social Perspectives (Dec. 2024)

[18] S.P. Sathe, Judicial Activism: The Indian Experience, 6 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol’y 29 (2001).

[21] The State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar, AIR 1952 SC 75

[23] The State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar, AIR 1952 SC 75

[25] Indra Sawhney v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 1993 SC 477.

[27] Indra Sawhney v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 1993 SC 477.

[30] Dr. Iqtidar Karamat Cheema, Constitutional and Legal Challenges Faced by Religious Minorities in India, U.S. COMM'N ON INT'L RELIGIOUS FREEDOM (Feb. 2017).

[33] D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (27th ed. 2024)..

[35] The Ahmedabad St. Xavier's College v. State of Gujarat, (1974) 1 SCC 717

[36] P.A. Inamdar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., (2005) 6 SCC 537.

[38] P.A. Inamdar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., (2005) 6 SCC 537.

[40] Alekhya Reddy, "Literally Interpreting the Law: An Appraisal of the Literal Rule of Interpretation in India," Manupatra

[41] Bal Patil & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 3172.

[42] Bal Patil & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 3172.

[44] Rajat Agarwal, "Interpretation of Statutes - The Purposive Approach," Legal Services India

[45] T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors., (2002) 8 SCC 481.

[46] T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors., (2002) 8 SCC 481.

[48]"Doctrine of Harmonious Construction in the Interpretation of Statutes," Legal Service India, https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-6955-doctrine-of-harmonious-construction-in-the-interpretation-of-statutes.html

[49] The Ahmedabad St. Xavier's College v. State of Gujarat, (1974) 1 SCC 717

[51] The Ahmedabad St. Xavier's College v. State of Gujarat, (1974) 1 SCC 717

[52] T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors., (2002) 8 SCC 481.

[54] TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 8 SCC 481 (Supreme Court of India).

[55] P.A. Inamdar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., (2005) 6 SCC 537.

[57] P.A. Inamdar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., (2005) 6 SCC 537 .

[58] Bal Patil & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 3172.

[59] Bal Patil & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 3172.

[60] Ministry of Minority Affairs, Government of India, "Prime Minister’s 15-Point Programme," Government of India.

[61] Ministry of Minority Affairs, Government of India, "Prime Minister’s 15-Point Programme," Government of India.

[1] Amy J. Schmitz, Expanding Access to Remedies, Voice, and Possibly Justice in United States Court Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), Oxford University Press.

[2] Amy J. Schmitz, Lola Akin Ojelabi, and John Zeleznikow, Researching Online Dispute Resolution to Expand Access to Justice, Giustizia Consensuale, 2021?.

[3] Ethan Katsh and Colin Rule, What We Know and Need to Know About Online Dispute Resolution, 67 S.C. L. Rev. 329, 2016?.

[4] Richard Susskind, Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future, Oxford University Press, 2013?.

[5] Rebecca L. Sandefur, The Fulcrum Point of Equal Access to Justice: Legal and Nonlegal Institutions of Remedy, 42 Loy. L.A. Law Rev. 949, 2009??.

[6] Susskind, R. (2019). Online Dispute Resolution: The Future of Justice. Oxford University Press.

[7] McCarthy, J. (2021). "The Digital Divide and Access to Justice." Journal of Law and Technology, 23(2), 123-145.

[8] Hensler, D. R., & Kessler, J. B. (2017). "Fairness in Online Dispute Resolution: Algorithms and the Future of Justice." International Journal of Dispute Resolution, 39(4), 567-589.

[9] Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2019). "Actionable Auditing: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Available Algorithmic Bias." Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13.

[10] McQuiston, E. (2020). Leveraging technology in the courts: Lessons from Florida’s ODR pilot. Harvard Law Review, 133, 2101–2110.

[11] Johnson, S. (2021). Designing justice: Utah’s innovative approach to small claims ODR. Stanford Journal of Law, Technology, and Policy.

[12] Levin, S. (2018). Michigan’s traffic ODR program: A case study in scalability. University of Michigan Law Review, 116(4), 215–230.

[13] McFarlane, S. (2020). Beyond commerce: Expanding the scope of the Singapore Convention. International Mediation Journal, 5(1), 45–60.

[14] Rule, C. (2020). The new handshake: Online dispute resolution and the future of consumer protection. American Bar Association.

[15] European Commission. (2021). The EU’s Online Dispute Resolution platform: Annual Report.

[16] Bingham, L. (2018). ODR and consumer protection: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 16(2), 89–102.

[17] Susskind, Richard. "Online Courts and the Future of Justice." Oxford University Press, 2019.=

[18] De Filippi, Primavera, and Samuel Bourgeois. "Blockchain and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative to Enforcement." Journal of Dispute Resolution, vol. 2018.

[19] Cortés, Pablo. "Access to Justice through Online Dispute Resolution." International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, vol. 1, 2014.

[20] Larson, David Allen. "The Future of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Definitions, Standards, Disability Accessibility, and Legislation." City University of Hong Kong Law Review, vol. 8, 2020-2022.

[21] Yadav, Pitamber. "Harnessing Technology for Dispute Resolution: A Critical Assessment of India's ODR Policy 2021." SSRN, 2023.

[22] Carr, Adrian. Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice: A Treatise on Technology and Dispute Resolution. Eleven International Publishing, 2012.

[23] Bhatia, Gautam, and Rishabh Dara. "Online Dispute Resolution in India: A Comparative Analysis." Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, vol. 3, no. 1, 2014.

[24] Wang, Guiguo. "Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice." Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law, 2015.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF PATENT PORTFOLIOS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS BY - AISHWARYA PANDEY

THE LAW OF COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING AND FREEDOM OF COMMERCIAL SPEECH: A LEGAL AND SOCIAL WORK PERSPECTIVE BY - ARYAN SINGH

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRE-PACKAGED INSOLVENCY FOR MSMES IN INDIA BY - NEETI GOYAL

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WRIT JURISDICTION IN THE UK AND INDIA VIS-À-VIS PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT BY - AVANISH KUMAR SONKAR & SAKSHI SINGH

LEGAL CHALLENGES OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS BY - AJIT RAJU KAMBLE & SHUBHAM BALASAHEB AUTE

FEDERALISM UNDER SIEGE: ANALYZING THE ENDORSEMENT OF ARTICLE 370 ABROGATION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA BY - SIA SETHI

ROLE OF NGOS AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN EXPANDING LEGAL AIDS BY - PRANSHUL JAISWAL

SURVEILLANCE OF CYBER SECURITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY - SOHAIR AHMED SHAIKH

SAFEGUARDING MINORITY RIGHTS: CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS, JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS, AND THEIR SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT IN INDIA BY - AGREEMA DOODRAJ

THE EXPANSION AND REDEFINATION OF JUSTICE THROUGH ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - ANKITA KUMARI & PRIYANSHU LUCKY

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2