INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH BY - PRIYANSHI SINGH

Authors: PRIYANSHI SINGH

Registration ID: 108852 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8852

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: 21jgls-psingh@jgu.edu.in

Page No : 28 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-68522399/RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH

MARITAL RAPE LAWS COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDY AND THE WAY FORWARD BY - SHASHWAT VARDHAN

Authors: SHASHWAT VARDHAN

Registration ID: 108851 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8851

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shashwatvardhansingh2006@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-98899218/MARITAL RAPE LAWS COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDY AND THE

REFORMING JUSTICE: THE INTERSECTION OF REHABILITATION AND PUNISHMENT AND THE ETHICAL IMPERATIVE FOR REHABILITATION IN INDIAN CRIMINAL FRAMEWORK BY - NANDINI DEVULAPALLI

Authors: NANDINI DEVULAPALLI

Registration ID: 108850 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8850

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: nandinidevulapalli04@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-96628471/REFORMING JUSTICE: THE INTERSECTION OF REHABILITAT

TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM: REFLECTS THE NATION’S ASPIRATIONS A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON CONSTITUTIONALISM AND TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM IN INDIA BY - DR. KONERU ANURADHA

Authors: DR. KONERU ANURADHA

Registration ID: 108849 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8849

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: anuradhakoneru988@gmail.com

Page No : 23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-16818684/TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM: REFLECTS THE NAT

GASLIGHTING IN PARENTAL ALIENATION DURING DIVORCE: A FAMILY LAW PERSPECTIVE BY - RIYA BHATIA

Authors: RIYA BHATIA

Registration ID: 108848 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8848

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: bhatiaria15@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-18322169/GASLIGHTING IN PARENTAL ALIENATION DURING DIVORCE:

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY IN INDIAN COMPANIES BY: APARAJITA PATEL

Authors: APARAJITA PATEL

Registration ID: 108847 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8847

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aparajita.patel1404@gmail.com

Page No : 29 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-55992267/REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVA

BALANCING LIBERTY AND STATE POWER: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF ARTICLE 21 AND EMERGENCY RESTRICTIONS IN INDIA BY - SHAKTISINH V PARMAR

Authors: SHAKTISINH V PARMAR

Registration ID: 108846 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8846

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shaktisinhp0@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-12817957/BALANCING LIBERTY AND STATE POWER: A CRITICAL EXAM

ACCELERATING DIGITALIZATION FOR DISABILITY JUSTICE: ADDRESSING ACCESSIBILITY CHALLANGES IN THE MODERN ERA BY - PAREKH RIDDHI KANUBHAI & DR.MAYURI PANDYA

Authors: PAREKH RIDDHI KANUBHAI & DR.MAYURI PANDYA

Registration ID: 108844 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8844 & IJLRA8845

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: prof.riddhiparekh@gmail.com & mayuri.himanshu@gmail.con

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-46534812/ACCELERATING DIGITALIZATION FOR DISABILITY JUSTICE

THE CURIOUS CASE OF SARADHA: A TALE OF CHIT FUNDS AND PONZI SCHEMES IN INDIA BY - ANJALI BHATT

Authors: ANJALI BHATT

Registration ID: 108843 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8843

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: anjalibhatt46@gmail.com

Page No : 28 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-99885783/THE CURIOUS CASE OF SARADHA: A TALE OF CHIT FUNDS

EVOLVING STATE ACCOUNTABILITY: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF TORTIOUS LIABILITY IN ENGLAND AND THE IMPACT OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY BY: SWATI.V & NITHIYA SURIYA.M

Authors: SWATI.V & NITHIYA SURIYA.M

Registration ID: 108841 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8841 & IJLRA8842

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vswati.law@vistas.ac.in & nithiyasurya.law@vistas.ac.in

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-84931215/EVOLVING STATE ACCOUNTABILITY: A CRITICAL EXAMINAT

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] JOHANNES RAU, THE NAGORNO – KARABAKH CONFLICT BETWEEN ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN. A BRIEF HISTORICAL OUTLINE 9 (2008).

[3] RAFAL CZACHOR, ABCHAZJA, OSETIA PO?UDNIOWA, GÓRSKI KARABACH: GENEZA I FUNKCJONOWANIE SYSTEMÓW POLITYCZNYCH 298 (2014).

[8] Interpretation and Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Republic of Azerbaijan v. Republic of Armenia), Application Instituting Proceedings, paras. 14 15 (Sep. 23, 2021) https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/181/181-20210923-APP-01-00-EN.pdf.

[9] Statement by the Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (Oct. 11, 2021) https://www.osce.org/minsk group/504007.

[10] See Letter dated 23 March 2009 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. UN Doc A/63/781–S/2009/156 (Mar. 24, 2009).

[11] Badinter Arbitration Commission, European Community Conference on Yugoslavia, Opinion No 2 (Nov. 20, 1991), reprinted in 92 I.L.R 167.

[12] Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening), 1992 I.C.J. 351, 386–387.

[13] Anne Peters, The Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris. How Relevant is it for Issues of Secession?, in SELF-DETERMINATION AND SECESSION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW (C. Walter et al. eds., 2014).

[14] Heiko Krüger, Nagorno Karabakh, in SELF-DETERMINATION AND SECESSION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 95-137 (C. Walter et al. eds., 2014); Malcolm Shaw, Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries, 8 EUR. J. INT’L. L. 494ff (1997).

[15] Annex to the letter dated 21 July 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Report on the fundamental norm of the territorial integrity of States and the right to self-determination in the light of Armenia’s revisionist claims, UN Doc. A/74/961S/2020/729, at. 8-13 (Jul. 22, 2020).

[17] Malcolm Shaw, The Heritage of States: The Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris Today 67 BRIT. Y.B. INT’L. L. 154 (1996); Anne Peters, The Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris: How Relevant Is It for Issues of Secession? in SELF-DETERMINATION AND SECESSION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 99- 103, 137 (Christian Walter, et al eds., 2014).

[18] Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States, UNGA Res 2625 (XXV), UN Doc A/Res/25/2625 (Oct. 24, 1970).

[19] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights art. 1, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171 [hereinafter ICCPR]; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights art. 1, Dec. 12, 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3 [hereinafter ICESCR].

[20] East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, 1995 I.C.J. para. 29; Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory Opinion, 2019, I.C.J. para. 180.

[21] Milena Sterio, Self-Determination and Secession Under International Law: Nagorno-Karabakh, 59 GERMAN Y.B. INT’L. L. 81-114 (2016). Similarly, Tahmina Salayeva, Self-determination v. territorial Integrity over the Nagorno Karabakh Region, POLITICON (Feb. 24, 2021).

[22] https://armenpress.am/eng/news/1030905.html.

[24] Decrees of President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev on the recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia (Aug. 26, 2008) No 1260 and 1261.

[26] Kamal Makili-Aliyev, Will International Law Help Resolve the Karabakh Conflict? (Oct. 04, 2021) http://www.makili-aliyev.com/.

[27] Bernhard Knoll-Tudor & Daniel Mueller, At Daggers Drawn: International Legal Issues Surrounding the Conflict in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, EJIL:TALK! (Nov. 17, 2020), https://www.ejiltalk.org/at-daggers drawn-international-legal-issues-surrounding-the-conflict-in-and-around-nagorno-karabakh/.

[28] Nico Schrijver, Ban on the Use of Force in the UN Charter, in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF THE USE OF FORCE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 472-475 (M. Weller et al. eds., 2015).

[29] Dapo Akande & Antonios Tzanakopoulos, Use of Force in Self-Defence to Recover Occupied Territory: When Is It Permissible?, EJIL:TALK! (Nov. 18, 2020) < https://www.ejiltalk.org/use-of-force-in-self-defence-to-recover occupied-territory-when-is-it-permissible/>; YORAM DINSTEIN, WAR, AGGRESSION AND SELF-DEFENCE 61-64 (6th edn., 2017).

[30] International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention), 12 August 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 287.

[31] Self-Determination of the People of Nagorno-Karabakh, EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ARTSAKH (Sept. 20, 2016).

[32] The Goa Incident 56(3) AM. J. INT. L. 617-632 (1962).

[33] Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission - Partial Award: Jus Ad Bellum - Ethiopia's Claims 1-8, 19 December 2005, 26 RIAA 465, paras. 10-11.

[34] Statement of the Presidents of the Russian Federation, the United States of America and the French Republic on Nagorno-Karabakh, UN NEWS (Sept. 27, 2020) https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/09/1073992.

[36] UNGA Res 3314 (XXIX), UN Doc. A/RES/3314(XXIX) (Dec. 14, 1974).

[37] Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States, UNGA Res 2625 (XXV), UN Doc A/Res/25/2625 (Oct. 24, 1970).

[38] Chiragov and Others v. Armenia, App. No. 13216/05, ECtHR (Grand Chamber, Jun. 16, 2015).

[39] Marko Milanovi?, Arguing the Kosovo Case, in THE LAW AND POLITICS OF THE KOSOVO ADVISORY OPINION 27-38 (Marko Milanovi? & Michael Wood eds., 2015).

[40] UNGA Res 46/242, UN Doc A/RES/46/242 (Aug. 25 1992).

[41] PACE Res 1416 ‘The conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Conference’ (Jan. 25, 2005).

[42] Cf. Christopher Greenwood, The Relationship Between Ius Ad Bellum and Ius In Bello, 9(4) REV. INT’L STUD. 223, 227-229, 331-333 (1983).

[43] General comment No. 36 (2018) on Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/36.

[44] See Article 5 of the ECHR and Article 9 of the ICCPR, respectively.

[45] The joint trilateral statement issued in Moscow on 11 January 2021

https://en.armradio.am/2021/01/11/armenian-azerbaijani-russian-leaders-sign-statement-on-unblocking-of all-economic-and-transport-links-in-the-region/.

[47] See Anton Trojanovski & Carlotta Gall, In Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Deal, Putin Applied a Deft New Touch, N. Y. TIMES, Apr. 24, 2021.

[48] Cf. PACE Resolution 1047 (1994) Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, point. 5.

[49] Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (signed 26 December 1933, entered into force 26 December 1934) 165 LNTS 19.

[50] Amit K. Chhabra, Superpower Responsibility for State Recognition: Charting a Course for Nagorno-Karabakh, 31 B. U. INT'L L. J. 132.

[54] Human Rights Watch, Azerbaijan: Seven Years of Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh (1994). THOMAS DE WAAL, BLACK GARDEN: ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN THROUGH PEACE AND WAR 210 (2013).

[55] See Sava Jankovic, Four Streams of Democracy and the Recognition of States: The EU Perspective, 22 SPANISH Y.B. INT’L. L. 55-76 (2018).

[56] Security Council resolutions 216 (1965) and 217 (1965), concerning Southern Rhodesia; Security Council resolution 541 (1983), concerning Northern Cyprus.

[57] UNSC Res 822, UN Doc. S/RES/822 (Apr. 30, 1993); UNSC Res 853, UN Doc. S/RES/853 (Jul 29, 1993); UNSC Res 874, UN Doc. S/RES/874 (Oct. 14, 1993); UNSC Res 884, UN Doc. S/RES/884 (Nov. 12, 1993).

[58] UNGA Res 62/243, UN Doc. A/RES 62/243 (Mar. 14, 2008).

[60] Press Release, Joint Statement by the Heads of Delegation of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair Countries (Dec. 3, 2020).

[61] Statement by the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair countries (Jul. 10, 2009).

[62] UN News, UN pledges humanitarian support as Armenia and Azerbaijan negotiate ‘lasting, peaceful settlement’ over Nagorno-Karabakh (Dec. 4, 2020) https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/12/1079302.

[63] UNSC Res 1244, UN Doc S/RES/1244 (Jun. 10, 1999).

[64] UNGA Res 181(II) (29 November 1947) UN Doc A/RES/181(II) (Future Government of Palestine); UNGA Res 1514(XV) (14 December 1960) UN Doc A/RES/1514(XV).

[65] Stefan Talmon, Germany Goes Back on Earlier Statements on the International Legal Status of Nagorno Karabakh, GERMAN PRACTICE IN INT’L L. (Oct. 12, 2020)

[66] András Rácz, In Russia's Hands Nagorno-Karabakh After the Ceasefire Agreement, INSTITUTE FOR SECURTY STUDIES (Apr. 8, 2021) https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/russias-hands#_introduction.

[67] Margarete Klein, Russlands Militärpolitik im postsowjetischen Raum STIFTUNG WISSENSCHAFT UND POLITIK (Sept. 29, 2019) https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/russlands-militaerpolitik-im-postsowjetischen-raum.

[68] United Nations Peacekeeping, ‘Principles of Peacekeeping’ (https:// peacekeeping.un.org/en/principles-of peacekeeping).

[70] See, inter alia, Human Rights Council, National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21, A/HRC/WG.6/16/AZE/1 (Feb. 7, 2013).

[71] Convention on Cluster Munitions (30 May 2008) 2688 UNTS 39.

[72] See UN News ‘UN rights chief warns of possible war crimes in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict’ https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/11/1076672.

[73] Armenia/Azerbaijan: Decapitation and War Crimes in Gruesome Videos Must be Urgently Investigated AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL (Dec. 10, 2020).

[74] Corfu Channel (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania) I.C.J. Rep. 1949, 22.

[75] Letter dated 31 October 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, UN Doc. A/75/566–S/2020/1073 (Nov.3, 2020).

[76] Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, Mercenaries in and Around the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Zone Must be Withdrawn – UN experts (Nov. 11, 2020) https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=26494&LangID=E.

[77] See Andrew Forte, Nagorno Karabakh – A Stark Reminder of the Council of Europe’s Operational ‘Grey Zones’ OPINIOJURIS (Feb. 11, 2021).

[1] Rehabilitate or punish?, https://www.apa.org, https://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug03/rehab (last visited Dec 15, 2024).

[2]Alexander Patterson, The Experiments of Sir Alexander Patterson (1844).

[3] Howard Zehr, Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice (1990).

[4] Joan Petersilia, When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Re-entry (2003).

[5] Joan Petersilia, The Influence of Criminal Justice Research (1987).

[6] Jeremy Bentham, Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789).

[7] Immanuel Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals (1797).

[9] Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishments (1764).

[10] History of Corrections—Punishment, Prevention, or Rehabilitation? | Encyclopedia.com, https://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/history-corrections-punishment-prevention-or-rehabilitation (last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[11] David Carter, 8.1. A Brief History of The Philosophies of Punishment (2019), https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/ccj230/chapter/9-1-a-brief-history-of-the-philosophies-of-punishment/ (last visited Oct 16, 2024).

[12] REHABILITATION | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rehabilitation (last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[13] Criminogenic Theories, Forensic Fundamentals, https://forensicfundamentals.com.au/articles/criminogenic-theories/ (last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[14] Interventions in rehabilitation - Rehabilitation Matters, (2022), https://rehabilitationmatters.com/what-is-rehabilitation-2/process-of-rehabilitation/interventions-in-rehabilitation/ (last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[15] Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for individuals involved in the justice system | County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, (2024), https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/strategies-and-solutions/what-works-for-health/strategies/cognitive-behavioral-therapy-cbt-for-individuals-involved-in-the-justice-system (last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[16] Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023, § 202, India.

[17] Francis T. Cullen, Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works, 42 Crime Justice 299 (2013).

[18] Seven Arguments Against Rehabilitation - An Assessment of Their Validity | Office of Justice Programs, https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/seven-arguments-against-rehabilitation-assessment-their-validity(last visited Dec 16, 2024)

[19] Against rehabilitation: for reparative justice | Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/publications/cjm/article/against-rehabilitation-reparative-justice(last visited Dec 16, 2024)

[20] Recidivism | National Institute of Justice, https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/corrections/recidivism (last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[21] Shaun Dixon, The New Paradigm of Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Incarceration-Based Rehabilitation in Regards to Recidivism Reduction., 2013, http://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd/357(last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[23] State of Tamil Nadu v. Nalini, (1999) 5 SCC 253 (India).

[24] Bachchan Singh v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 684, ¶ 8, at 688 (India).

[25] K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra, (1962) AIR 605, 1962 SCR Supl. (1) 567, ¶ 13, at 570 (India).

[26] Shyam Prakash Pandey, Kinds of Punishment under Indian Penal Code: A Critical Evaluation and Need for Reform, 4.

[27] State of Gujarat v. Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, (1998) 7 SCC 392, ¶ 10, at 396 (India).

[28] Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, The Indian Penal Code 34th ed. 2014, at 123 (LexisNexis 2014).

[29] Mohammad Giasuddin v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1977) 3 SCC 287, ¶ 3 (India).

[30] RECOGNIZING AND BALANCING THE RIGHTS OF THE VICTIMS WITHIN THE INDIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM., (Oct. 30, 2019), https://lexinsight.wordpress.com/2019/10/30/recognizing-and-balancing-the-rights-of-the-victims-within-the-indian-justice-system/ (last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[31] Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-basic-principles-justice-victims-crime-and-abuse (last visited Dec 16, 2024).

[1] Navtej Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1

[2] Patterson, C.Perry, "The Evolution of Constitutionalism" (1948). Minnesota Law Review. 934. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/934

[4] 540 Henry Schwarz and Sangeeta Ray (EDS), A Companion of 3 Postcolonial Studies (Blackwell Publishing, 2000).

[5] Michel Rosenfeld (EDS), Constitutionalism, identity, 4 Difference and Legitimacy- Theoretical Perspective, 41-42 (Duke University Press, 1994).

[6] D.D. BASU, SHORTER CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 115-16 (Justice A.R. 6 Lakshamanan, Justice Bhagabati Prosad Banerjee & V.R. Manohar, 14th ed., 2009).

[7] D.D. BASU, SHORTER CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 115-16 (Justice A.R. 6 Lakshamanan, Justice Bhagabati Prosad Banerjee & V.R. Manohar, 14th ed., 2009).

[8] C.H. McIlwain, Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern, 21-22 (1987).

[9] Polybins was imprisoned in Italy for sixteen years, and during this time wrote a history of the Roman Republic in which he made the first exposition of the principle of checks and balances known to political theory.

[10] Cicero was the greatest lawyer of the ancient world and was an exponent of the doctrine of Natural Law. "True Law," he said, in his De Republica, "is right reason in agreement with nature; it is of universal application, unchanging and ever lasting . . . we cannot be freed from its obligations by Senate or people . . . and there will not be different laws at Rome and at Athens, or different laws now and in the future, but one eternal and unchangeable law will be valid for all nations and all times, and there will be one master and ruler, that is God, over us all, for He is the author of this law, its promulgator, and its enforcing judge."

[11] William A. Dunning, Political Theories, Ancient and Modern 64-65 (1913).

[12] Prof.(Dr.) Mahendra Pal Singh, Vice Chancellor, “Constitutionalism in India in Comparative Perspective”, the lecture delivered in the memory of Dr.D.D. Basu at National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata in February 2018. Pgs 645-646.

https://nujslawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/11.4-MP-Singh-CONSTITUTIONALISM-IN-INDIA-IN-COMPARATIVE-PERSPECTIVE.pdf

[13] Bracton, Henry of Bratton (d. 1268), a judge of the King's Bench in the reign of Henry III in his De Legibus et Consultudinibus Angliae (written before 1256), a collectioft of about 2,000 common law decisions, says "The King himself ought not be subject to man, but subject to God and the law, for the law makes the King. Let the King then attribute to the law what the law attributes to him, namely, dominion and power, for there is nw King where the will and not the law has dominion. " (De Legibus et Consuetudenibus Angiae (Swiss ed. 1854) 5 b.)

[14] Sir Edward Coke, and his De Legi us had a tremendous influence in the development of the supremacy of law. He contended that all authority was derived from law and was, therefore, limited by law. He said natural law was immutable because it could not be repealed. His doctrine of the supremacy of law is the essence of constitutionalism. (De Laudibus Legum Angliae (Amos ed. 1825), c.c. 9, 13, 18, 34 at 26-27.)

In the Dr. Bonham's case, decided in the Common Pleas in 1610, Coke said: "And it appears in our books, that in many cases, the common law will control acts of Parliament, and sometimes adjudge them to be utterly void; for when an act of Parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it and adjudge such an act to be void." "Common right and reason" is something permanent and fundamental, and, therefore, higher law.

[15] AV Dicey was one of the prominent British Whig jurist and constitutional theorist. In his work ‘Introduction to the study of the law of the Constitution (1885) explained three major elements of constitutionalism with the help of ‘the doctrine of rule of law’. They are 1. Supremacy of the law, 2. Equality before the law and 3. Predominance of legal spirit.

[16] Patterson, C.Perry, "The Evolution of Constitutionalism" (1948). Minnesota Law Review. 934. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/934

[17] Krati Garg, ‘Development of Constitutionalism during the English Period’, published in online page LexForti Legal : Legal Outsourcing Platform on the date January 15, 2021.

https://lexforti.com/legal-news/development-of-constitutionalism-during-the-english-period/#_ftn2

[18] Ramashroy Roy, Beyond Ego's Domain: Being and Order in the Vedas (Delhi: Shipra Publications, 1999), p. 8. https://www.mids.ac.in/assets/doc/WP_165.pdf

[19] Rohit De, Constitutional Antecedents in The Oxford Handbook of The Indian Constitution 20-23 (S. Choudhry, M. Khosla & P.B. Mehta ed., 2016).

https://nujslawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/11.4-MP-Singh-CONSTITUTIONALISM-IN-INDIA-IN-COMPARATIVE-PERSPECTIVE.pdf

[20] Rohit De, Constitutional Antecedents in The Oxford Handbook of The Indian Constitution 23-26 (S. Choudhry, M. Khosla & P.B. Mehta ed., 2016).

https://nujslawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/11.4-MP-Singh-CONSTITUTIONALISM-IN-INDIA-IN-COMPARATIVE-PERSPECTIVE.pdf

[21] J. Tully, Strange Multiplicity Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (2007). Chapter 6 (in general and its conclusion in particular).

[22] Ms. Nivedita Ghos, Transformative Constitutionalism and rights of Homosexuals in India and South Africa: A comparative Study, CMR University Journal for Contemporary Legal Affairs, Vol.3, Issue2, August, 2021, MNLU, Nagapur. Pgs 4 and 5.

https://www.cmr.edu.in/school-of-legal-studies/journal/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/08-Transformative-Constitutionalism-and-Rights-of-Homosexuals-in-India-and-South-Africa-A-Comparative-Study.pdf

[23] Klare, E. Karl., Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism, 14 SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS, (1998) p. 146. Cited in Alisha Dhingra, Indian Constitutionalism: A Case of Transformative Constitutionalism, ASIAN JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDIES, 2(7), (2014) p. 136

[24] Pius Langa, Transformative Constitutionalism, 17 STELLENBOSCH L. REV. p. 351-352 (2006). Cited in Vrinda Narain, Postcolonial Constitutionalism in India: Complexities & Contradictions, 25 S. CAL. INTERDISC. L.J. 109 (2016)

[25] The words socialism and secular concepts introduced in our constitution by 42^nd amendment in the year 1976.

[27] Livelaw News Network, “Constitution intends to transform society”:Justice Chandrachud, posted on 10^th Sept 2018.

https://www.livelaw.in/constitution-intends-to-transform-society-justice-chandrachud-video/

[28] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[29] Minerva Mills Ltd v. Union of India, (1980) 3 SCC 625, 642.

[30] Granville Austin, The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation, Oxford University Press, 1999.

[31] K.S. Puttaswamy and Anr. vs. Union of India ((2017) 10 SCC 1)

[32] National Legal Service Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India (2014 INSC 275)

[33] Navtej Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1

[34] Indian Young Lawyers Assn. v. State of Kerala, (2019) 11 SCC 1

[35] Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India, (2018) 8 SCC 501

[36] Shrimanth Balasaheb Patil v. Karnataka Legislative Assembly, (2020) 2 SCC 595.

[1] Holly Smith, 'Parental Alienation Syndrome: Fact or Fiction? The Problem with Its Use in Child Custody Cases' (2016) 11(1) UMass L Rev

[4] Col. Ramneesh Pal Singh v Sugandhi Aggarwal [2024] 6 S.C.R. 259; 2024 INSC 397 (Civil Appeal No 6137 of 2024) (08 May 2024)

[6]Griffiths Law PC, 'What is Parental Alienation & How to Fight Back' (2024) https://www.griffithslawpc.com/blog-articles/parental-alienation/

[7] Sullivan, M., & Kelly, J. 'Assessing for Alienation in Child Custody and Access Evaluations' (2023) 296 Family Court Review 201

[1] “Viktor Mayer-Schönberger & Kenneth Cukier, Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think 6 (2013).”

[2] “Ira S. Rubinstein, Big Data: The End of Privacy or a New Beginning?, 3 Int'l Data Privacy L. 74, 74-76 (2013).”

[3] “danah boyd & Nicole B. Ellison, Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship, 13 J. Computer-Mediated Comm. 210, 210-230 (2008).”

[4] “Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 8/2014 on the Recent Developments on the Internet of Things, 14/EN WP 223 (2014).”

[5] “W. Kuan Hon et al., The Problem of 'Personal Data' in Cloud Computing: What Information is Regulated?—The Cloud of Unknowing, 1 Int'l Data Privacy L. 211, 211-228 (2011).”

[6] “Margot E. Kaminski, The Right to Explanation, Explained, 34 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 189, 189-218 (2019).”

[7] “Ponemon Institute, Cost of a Data Breach Report 2021 (2021).”

[8] “Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power 8 (2019).”

[9] “Christopher Kuner, Regulation of Transborder Data Flows under Data Protection and Privacy Law: Past, Present and Future 10-15 (OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 187, 2011).”

[10] “Edward Lee, The Right to Be Forgotten v. Free Speech, 12 J.L. & Pol'y for Info. Soc'y 85, 85-112 (2015).”

[11] “Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 3/2012 on Developments in Biometric Technologies, 00720/12/EN WP193 (2012).”

[12] “Avi Goldfarb & Catherine E. Tucker, Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising, 57 Mgmt. Sci. 57, 57-71 (2011).”

[13] “Anupam Chander & Uyên P. Lê, Data Nationalism, 64 Emory L.J. 677, 677-739 (2015).”

[14] “Ann Cavoukian, Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles, Info. & Privacy Comm'r of Ont. (2011).”

[15] “Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 1295; M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra, AIR 1954 SC 300.”

[16] “Gobind v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (1975) 2 SCC 148.”

[17] “R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 6 SCC 632.”

[18] “Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.”

[22] “Bhatia, Gautam. “The Supreme Court's Right to Privacy Judgment – I: Foundations.” Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy, 27 Aug. 2017.”

[23] “The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India), § 43A.”

[25] “Apar Gupta, Commentary on Information Technology Act 123 (2011).”

[26] “Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011, Gazette of India, pt. II sec. 3(i) (Apr. 11, 2011).”

[27] “Vakul Sharma, Information Technology Law and Practice 312 (4th ed. 2015).”

[28] “Nandan Kamath, Law Relating to Computers, Internet and E-Commerce 201 (5th ed. 2012).”

[29] “Talat Fatima, Cyber Crimes 156 (2011).”

[30] “Farooq Ahmad, Cyber Law in India 89 (4th ed. 2013).”

[31] “Pavan Duggal, Textbook on Cyber Law 178 (2014).”

[32] “Biswanath Prasad Samal v. Union of India, AIR 2019 Cal 287.”

[33] “The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India), § 72A.”

[34] “Rodney D. Ryder, Guide to Cyber Laws 234 (2nd ed. 2016).”

[35] “Karnika Seth, Computers, Internet and New Technology Laws 167 (2013).”

[36] “Vijay Pal Dalmia, Indian Cyber Law 201 (2017).”

[37] “R.K. Chaubey, An Introduction to Cyber Crime and Cyber Law 289 (2nd ed. 2012).”

[38] “The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India), § 72A.”

[39] “Yatindra Singh, Cyber Laws 145 (6th ed. 2016).”

[40] “Nishith Desai Associates, Indian Legal and Tax Considerations 78 (2018).”

[41] “Anuj Agarwal v. Union of India, WP(C) 7123/2018 (Del. HC, Mar. 1, 2019).”

[42] “Vakul Sharma, Information Technology Law and Practice 356 (5th ed. 2019).”

[43] “Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011, Rule 3.”

[58] “Reserve Bank of India, Storage of Payment System Data, RBI/2017-18/153 (Apr. 6, 2018).”

[60] “Reserve Bank of India, Storage of Payment System Data – Clarification, RBI/2018-19/216 (June 26, 2019).”

[61] “Anirudh Burman & Bhargavi Zaveri, Regulatory Governance Under the PDP Bill: A Powerful Ship with an Unchecked Captain?, 54 Econ. & Pol. Wkly. 45, 45-52 (2019).”

[62] “Arindrajit Basu et al., The Localisation Gambit: Unpacking Policy Measures for Sovereign Control of Data in India, Centre for Internet & Society (Mar. 19, 2019).”

[63] “Basu, Hickok & Chawla, The Localisation Gambit: Unpacking Policy Measures for Sovereign Control of Data in India, The Centre for Internet and Society (2019).”

[64] “Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Recommendations on Privacy, Security and Ownership of the Data in the Telecom Sector (July 16, 2018).”

[73] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, Bill No. 373 of 2019 (India).”

[84] “KPMG, Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019: Impact Analysis, Feb. 2020.”

[85] “Deloitte, India's Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019: Key Requirements and Impact Analysis, Mar. 2020.”

[86] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 34.”

[89] “Anirudh Burman, Will India's Proposed Data Protection Law Protect Privacy and Promote Growth?, Carnegie India (Mar. 9, 2020).”

[90] “Ernst & Young, Data Protection in India: All You Need to Know About Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, Jan. 2020.”

[91] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 57.”

[96] “Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation) [2016] OJ L119/1.”

[97] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 20; GDPR, art. 17.”

[98] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 11, 30; GDPR, art. 7, 37.”

[99] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 33, 34; GDPR, ch. V.”

[100] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 57; GDPR, art. 83.”

[101] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 35.”

[104] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 27; GDPR, art. 35.”

[105] “Deloitte, Data Privacy and Protection: Challenges for Indian Companies, 14 (2019).”

[106] “KPMG, Personal Data Protection in India: Challenges and Opportunities, 22 (2020).”

[107] “PwC India, Cost of Data Protection Compliance for Indian Businesses, 8 (2021).”

[108] “Ernst & Young, Technical Challenges in Implementing Data Protection Measures in India, 17 (2020).”

[109] “Nishith Desai Associates, Data Localization: Impact on Indian Businesses, 9 (2019).”

[110] “NASSCOM, Skill Gap Analysis in Data Protection and Privacy Sector in India, 12 (2021).”

[111] “McKinsey & Company, Balancing Data Protection and Innovation in Indian Companies, 25 (2020).”

[112] “AZB & Partners, Cross-Border Data Transfers: Challenges for Indian Companies, 7 (2021).”

[113] “Trilegal, Implementing Data Subject Rights: Practical Challenges for Indian Businesses, 19 (2020).”

[114] “Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Consent Management in the Indian Data Protection Landscape, 11 (2021).”

[115] “J. Sagar Associates, Data Breach Notification: Compliance Challenges for Indian Companies, 15 (2020).”

[116] “S&R Associates, Impact of Data Protection Penalties on Indian Businesses, 8 (2021).”

[117] “Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co., Reconciling Sector-Specific and General Data Protection Laws in India, 13 (2020).”

[118] “Khaitan & Co, Interpreting Ambiguities in Indian Data Protection Laws: A Business Perspective, 9 (2021).”

[119] “Boston Consulting Group, Cultural Challenges in Implementing Data Protection in Indian Organizations, 21 (2020).”

[120] “Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Gov't of India, Report of the Joint Committee on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (2021).”

[121] “NITI Aayog, Data Empowerment and Protection Architecture: Draft for Discussion, 28 (2020).”

[122] “Rishab Bailey & Smriti Parsheera, Data Localisation in India: Questioning the Means and Ends, NIPFP Working Paper No. 242 (2018).”

[123] “Smriti Parsheera, Protecting Privacy in India: The Roles of Consent and Fairness in Data Protection, Carnegie India (2020).”

[124] “Reserve Bank of India, Report of the Working Group on Digital Lending including Lending through Online Platforms and Mobile Apps (2021).”

[125] “NITI Aayog, National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence #AIforAll, 84 (2018).”

[126] “Data Security Council of India, Cyber Incident Response Trends in India, 17 (2021).”

[127] “Internet and Mobile Association of India, Social Media in India 2021, 42 (2021).”

[128] “Information Commissioner's Office (UK), Data Protection Impact Assessments under the GDPR, 9 (2018).”

[129] “Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Recommendations on Privacy, Security and Ownership of the Data in the Telecom Sector, 56 (2018).”

[130] “Rahul Matthan, Beyond Consent: A New Paradigm for Data Protection, Takshashila Discussion Document, 2017-03 (2017).”

[131] “Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 03/2013 on Purpose Limitation, 00569/13/EN WP 203 (2013).”

[132] “Cynthia Dwork, Differential Privacy: A Survey of Results, in Theory and Applications of Models of Computation 1-19 (Springer, 2008).”

[133] “OECD, The Path to Global Cooperation in Data Protection Enforcement, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 287 (2019).”

[134] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, Bill No. 373 of 2019 (India).”

[135] “Anirudh Burman, Will India's Proposed Data Protection Law Protect Privacy and Promote Growth?, Carnegie India (Mar. 9, 2020).”

[136] “KPMG, Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019: Impact Analysis, Feb. 2020.”

[137] “Deloitte, India's Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019: Key Requirements and Impact Analysis, Mar. 2020.”

[138] “Reserve Bank of India, Storage of Payment System Data, RBI/2017-18/153 (Apr. 6, 2018).”

[139] “Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.”

[140] “Ernst & Young, Data Protection in India: All You Need to Know About Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, Jan. 2020.”

[141] “Data Security Council of India, Cyber Incident Response Trends in India, 17 (2021).”

[142] “Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 03/2013 on Purpose Limitation, 00569/13/EN WP 203 (2013).”

[143] “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, § 57.”

[144] “Cynthia Dwork, Differential Privacy: A Survey of Results, in Theory and Applications of Models of Computation 1-19 (Springer, 2008).”

[145] “Int'l Labour Org., Protection of Workers' Personal Data: An ILO Code of Practice (1997).”

[1] Lazar, J. Managing digital accessibility at universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Univ Access Inf Soc 21, 749–765 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00792-5

[2] P. Acosta-Vargas, S. Luján-Mora and L. Salvador-Ullauri, "Evaluation of the web accessibility of higher-education websites," 2016 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Istanbul, Turkey, 2016, pp. 1-6

[3] AlMeraj, Z., Alhuwail, D., Qadri, R. et al. Understanding mindsets, skills, current practices, and barriers of adoption of digital accessibility in Kuwait’s software development landscape. Univ Access Inf Soc 23, 1427–1446 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00980-5

[4] Sophie, Mitra., Qin, Gao. (2023). 3. Disability and social policy: Global evidence and perspectives. Global Social Policy, doi: 10.1177/14680181221146030

[5] Alina, Engelman., Leyla, Craig., Alastair, Iles. (2022). 1. Global Disability Justice In Climate Disasters: Mobilizing People With Disabilities As Change Agents.. Health Affairs, doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00474

[6] Anastasia, Liasidou. (2013). 5. Intersectional understandings of disability and implications for a social justice reform agenda in education policy and practice. Disability & Society, doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.710012

[7] Alina, Engelman., Leyla, Craig., Alastair, Iles. (2022). 1. Global Disability Justice In Climate Disasters: Mobilizing People With Disabilities As Change Agents.. Health Affairs, doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00474

[8] Kate, Ching-Ching, Chan. (2023). 2. Disability Through the Lens of Justice. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198875611.001.0001

[9] Madhavi, Sripathi., T., S., Leelavati., Ramarao, Mopidevi., Susmitha, Kunchaparthi. (2024). Innovations in Closing the Digital Gap. Advances in computer and electrical engineering book series, 336-357.

doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-4111-7.ch014

[10] (2022). The Use of Inclusive Digital Technologies. 141-150. doi: 10.1201/9781003215998-12

[11] Georgia, van, Toorn. (2024). 3. Inclusion interrupted: Lessons from the making of a digital assistant by and for people with disability. Government Information Quarterly, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101900

[12] Oksana, Tymoshchuk., A.M., Pisco, Almeida. (2022). 5. Digital technologies as a promotor of well-being and inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: what is the current situation?. doi: 10.1145/3563137.3563161

[14] William, J., Triplett. (2023). 2. The Role of Technology in Promoting Diversity and Inclusion. Cybersecurity and Innovative Technology Journal, doi: 10.53889/citj.v1i1.306

[1] Wade, E.C.S. and Bradley, A. W. Constitutional and Administrative law 10th Ed. (Longman, London, 1985) P.678; Hood Philips, O. and Paul Jackson, Constitutional and Administrative law, 7th Ed. (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1987) P.702.

[2] Herbert Broom, A Selection of Legal Maxims, 10th Ed. (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1939), pp. 21

[3] The society was not complex and the civil law was redimentary. The subject of Anglo-Sexon Justice did not cover offences except violent ones and theft. In such a society when the law could not compel an accused or a suspect to submit himself to Justice and pay fines, it could not be imagined that a tenant or an individual might sue his Lord, or the over Lord-the King, for damages; Pollock and Maitland, The History of English Law, Vol. 1 (1968) P.P. 37-38

[4] Street, H. Governmental Liability: A comparative study, (Cambridge University Press, 1953) P.1

[5] somervell, "The State as Defendant." 33 A.L.J., (1959), P.149

[6] Holdsworth, W.S. A History of English Law, IX 2nd Ed. Matheuven and Co., Ltd., London, (1944), P.12 Pollock and Milland supra note 6 at P515.

[9] Viscount Canterbury v. Attorney General (1842):1 Ph.306

[10] Attorney General v. De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd., (1920) A.C.P.508 at P.P. 530-531

[11]Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Company v. Lords Commissioner of Admiralty, (1947) K.B. 794 at pp. 801

[14] This device was adopted by statute and still operates for criminal liability for traffic offences; Road Traffic Act, 1972 S.188(8), Barnett v. French (1981) 1 W.L.R. 848

[15] Glanville Williams, Crown Proceedings (1948) pp.17-18

[18] Crown Proceedings Committee Report, emd.2842 (1927)

[19] Section 2(1) of the Crown Proceedings Act, 1947, There is no liability in tort outside the Act, Tranik v. Lennox (1985) IWLR 532

[25] (1952)2 All.E.R.149; Delvin J. expressed his dissatisfaction thus: "before I leave this case, I must express my uneasy feeling that Justice may not have been done because the material evidence before me was not complete and something more than an uneasy feeling that whether Justice has been done or not, it certainly will not appear to have been done' at p. 155.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH BY - PRIYANSHI SINGH

MARITAL RAPE LAWS COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDY AND THE WAY FORWARD BY - SHASHWAT VARDHAN

REFORMING JUSTICE: THE INTERSECTION OF REHABILITATION AND PUNISHMENT AND THE ETHICAL IMPERATIVE FOR REHABILITATION IN INDIAN CRIMINAL FRAMEWORK BY - NANDINI DEVULAPALLI

TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM: REFLECTS THE NATION’S ASPIRATIONS A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON CONSTITUTIONALISM AND TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM IN INDIA BY - DR. KONERU ANURADHA

GASLIGHTING IN PARENTAL ALIENATION DURING DIVORCE: A FAMILY LAW PERSPECTIVE BY - RIYA BHATIA

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY IN INDIAN COMPANIES BY: APARAJITA PATEL

BALANCING LIBERTY AND STATE POWER: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF ARTICLE 21 AND EMERGENCY RESTRICTIONS IN INDIA BY - SHAKTISINH V PARMAR

ACCELERATING DIGITALIZATION FOR DISABILITY JUSTICE: ADDRESSING ACCESSIBILITY CHALLANGES IN THE MODERN ERA BY - PAREKH RIDDHI KANUBHAI & DR.MAYURI PANDYA

THE CURIOUS CASE OF SARADHA: A TALE OF CHIT FUNDS AND PONZI SCHEMES IN INDIA BY - ANJALI BHATT

EVOLVING STATE ACCOUNTABILITY: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF TORTIOUS LIABILITY IN ENGLAND AND THE IMPACT OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY BY: SWATI.V & NITHIYA SURIYA.M

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2