INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

PATENTING OF STEM CELLS: NEED TO RETHINK FOR REGULATORY FRAMEWORK BY - K. AMULYA & DR.P.R.L.RAJAVENKATESAN

Authors: K. AMULYA & DR.P.R.L.RAJAVENKATESAN

Registration ID: 108801 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8801 & IJLRA8802

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: amulyareddy.k2024@vitstudent.ac.in & rajavenkatesan.prl@vit.ac.in

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-35469961/PATENTING OF STEM CELLS: NEED TO RETHINK FOR REGUL

REVISITING LEGAL IMMUNITY: LAWYERS EXEMPTED FROM CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT AND CONTEMPORARY JUDICIAL RAMIFICATIONS BY - ADI JAIN & VANDAN PAREEK

Authors: ADI JAIN & VANDAN PAREEK

Registration ID: 108799 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8799 & IJLRA8800

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: adijain892@gmail.com & vandanpareek4800@gmail.com

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-26145217/REVISITING LEGAL IMMUNITY: LAWYERS EXEMPTED FROM C

REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN MEDIA; A PERSPECTIVE BY - ARYA SURESH

Authors: ARYA SURESH

Registration ID: 108798 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8798

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aryasuresh317@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-83478957/REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN MEDIA; A PERSPECTIVE

WOMENS RIGHT TO EQUALITY: COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDIA AND U.S.A BY - MANSI PAHAL

Authors: MANSI PAHAL

Registration ID: 108797 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8797

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: mansipahal99@gmail.com

Page No : 23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-23346321/WOMENS RIGHT TO EQUALITY: COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS BET

BIODIVERSITY IS THE BIGGEST ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT BY - GOMATHI M

Authors: GOMATHI M

Registration ID: 108796 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8796

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: gomathimuruganmurugan@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-98257341/BIODIVERSITY IS THE BIGGEST ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT

CLOUD COMPUTING AND DATA SOVEREIGNTY: NAVIGATING LEGAL AND REGULATORY CHALLENGES BY - PRASHANT DUBEY & DR. RAZIT SHARMA

Authors: PRASHANT DUBEY? & DR. RAZIT SHARMA

Registration ID: 108794 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8794 & IJLRA8795

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: prashantdubey252@gmail.com & razitsharma@gmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-42352684/CLOUD COMPUTING AND DATA SOVEREIGNTY: NAVIGATING L

AN ANALYSIS ON ROLE OF PUBLIC IN ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BY - P.SORNAMUGI, T.VARSHA, A.VENKATESH NANTHAKUMAR & DR.B.LAVARAJU

Authors: P.SORNAMUGI , T.VARSHA , A.VENKATESH NANTHAKUMAR & DR.B.LAVARAJU

Registration ID: 108790 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8790, IJLRA8791, IJLRA8792 & IJLRA8793

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sornamugipasupathi@gmail.com

Page No : 27 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-91189758/AN ANALYSIS ON ROLE OF PUBLIC IN ADMINISTRATION OF

GENDER DISPARITY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: ANALYZING THE CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES, AND POTENTIAL REFORMS BY - SWASTIK SINGH

Authors: SWASTIK SINGH

Registration ID: 108789 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8789

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: swastik2000singh@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-81678959/GENDER DISPARITY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: A

COMMENT: M/S UMESH GOEL V. HIMACHAL PRADESH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. BY - SHREYA PANKAJ

Authors: SHREYA PANKAJ

Registration ID: 108788 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8788

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shreyapankaj6@ilc.du.ac.in

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-35652375/COMMENT: M/S UMESH GOEL V. HIMACHAL PRADESH COOPER

POLITICAL NEUTRALITY IS A DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTIC OF INDIAN CIVIL SERVANT BY: HARSHI GAUTAM & SRISHTI GUPTA

Authors: HARSHI GAUTAM & SRISHTI GUPTA

Registration ID: 108787 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8786 & IJLRA8787

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: harshigautam242@gmail.com & gsrishti906@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-59874728/POLITICAL NEUTRALITY IS A DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTIC

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

*LL.M., IPR Student, VIT School of Law, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India- 600127.

[1] M. E. Williams et al., Ethics in Stem Cell Research: Human Embryos and the Road to Therapies, 15 J. Bioethics 45, 46 (2022).

[2] S. A. Carter, Introduction to Cell Biology: The Basic Unit of Life, 10 Cell Studies 5, 6 (2019).

[3] R. B. Thompson & A. M. Fields, Anatomy of the Human Body, 4th ed. 34 (2018).

[4] J. H. Smith et al., Stem Cells: The Potential of Embryonic Totipotent Cells, 25 J. Cell Science 99, 102 (2020).

[5] W. J. M. Hennessey, "Stem Cell Differentiation and Totipotency," 34 J. Biol. Chem. 2324, 2330 (2015).

[6] John D. Smith, The Science of Stem Cells, 32 Cell Biology Journal 12, 15 (2019).

[7] Mary A. Williams, Advances in Human Stem Cell Research, 45 Stem Cell Reports 101, 105 (2020).

[8] Chris J. Lee, Ethical Considerations in Human Stem Cell Research, 24 Bioethics Quarterly 92, 95 (2020).

[9] George Daley, Stem Cells and the Future of Medicine: What We Know, and What We Need to Know, Harvard University Press (2008).

[10] Marie A. Ravaud, Ethics of Stem Cell Research, 15 J. of Bioethics 234 (2019).

[11] Mark A. Lemley, Intellectual Property in the New Economy, 47 Stanford Law Review 1811 (1995).

[12] John Harris, The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 60 Journal of Medical Ethics 70 (2004).

[13] Thomas H. Murray, The Moral Problem of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 56 University of Chicago Law Review 513 (2007).

[14] Brüstle v. Greenpeace, Case C-34/10, [2011] E.C.R. I-09829 (Court of Justice of the European Union).

[15] Christopher J. M. McCrudden, Patent Law and Global Governance, 45 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2015).

[16] William H. Hines & Michael J. Duncan, International Patent Law and Biotechnology, 72 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 99 (2020)

[17] Wagers AJ& Weissman IL, Plasticity of adult stem cells, Cell(2004) 116.

[18] Zakrzewski W, Dobrzy?ski M, Szymonowicz M& Rybak Z, Stem cells: Past, present, and future, Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 10 (2019) 68.

[19] Pittenger M F, Mackay A M, Beck S C, Jaiswal R K, Douglas R, Mosca J D, Moorman M A, Simonetti, D W, Craig S&MarshakD R, Multilineage Potential of Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Science, 284 (1999) 143.

[20] Tuan RS, Boland G& Tuli R, Adult mesenchymal stem cells and cell-based tissue engineering, Arthritis Res Ther, 5 (2003) 32.

[21] GepsteinL, Derivation and Potential Applications of Huma Embryonic Stem Cells, American heart Association Journal Circulation Research,91(2002).

[22] Okabe M, The cell biology of mammalian fertilization, Development,140 (2013) 4471

[23] Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS& Jones JM, Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts, Science, 282 (1998) 1145.

[24] Ardner D K&Arvey AJ, Blastocyst metabolism, Reproduction, Fertility and Development,27 (2015) 638-654.

[25] Afroze SH& Jenson K, et. al, Regenerative medicine applications on organ transplant,DOI No. 10.1016/B978-0-12-398523-1.00026-4,(2014) 375.

[26] Yu J &Thomson J A, Embryonic stem cells,In Regenerative Medicine. NIH, eds. Terese Winslow, (2006) 1

[27] Inn Chuan Ng, PornteeraPawijit, Jordon Tan&Hanry Yu, Anatomy and Physiology for Biomaterial Research and Development, in Roger Narayan (ed.) Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering (Elsevier, 2019) 225.

[28] Horie M, Ito A, Kawabe Y&Kamihira M, A Genetically Engineered STO Feeder System Expressing E-Cadherin and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor for Mouse Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture, Journal of Bioprocessing and Biotechniques S3: 001 (2004).

[29] Spinelli V&Coppi P D, et. al., Regenerative Medicine Applications in Organ Transplantation, DOI No. 10.1016/B978-0-12-398523-1.00026-4, (2014) 39

[30] Dulak J, Szade K et. al., Adult stem cells: Hopes and hypes of regenerative medicine, Acta Biochimica Polonica,(2015) 329.

[31] Mehta Rajvi H, Sourcing human embryos for embryonic stem cell lines: Problems & perspectives, 140 The Indian Journal of Medical Research, Suppl 1 (2014): S106-11

[32] Larijani B, Esfahani E N, et. al., Stem cell therapy in treatment of different diseases, ActamedicaIranica,50 (2012) 79.

[33] Devine M J, Ryten M, Vodicka P, Thomson A J, Burdon T, Houlden H, et al., Parkinson‘s disease induced pluripotent stem cells with triplication of the ?-synuclein locus, Nature Communications, 2 (2011) 440.

[34] Hermann A, Maisel Met. al., Multipotent neural stem cells from the adult Tegmentum with dopaminergic potential develop essential properties of functional neurons, Stem Cells Journal,24 (2006) 946.

[35] Mucke L, Neuroscience: Alzheimer‘s disease, Nature, 461(2009) 895–897.

[36] Fouad G I, Bull, Stem cells as a promising therapeutic approach for Alzheimer‘s disease: Areview, Bulletin of the National Research Centre(2019).

[37] Augello A, Kurth T B& De Bari C, Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Perspective from in vitro cultures to in vivo migration and niches, European Cells and Materials, 20 (2010) 121.

[38] Bagher L &Amini Pet. al., Stem Cell Therapy in Treatment of Different Diseases, Acta medica Iranica, 50 (2012) 79.

[39] Clifford D M, Fisher S A, Brunskill S J, Doree C, Mathur A, et. al., Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, 2 (2012).

[40] Stephanie S. Leppard, Intellectual Property Rights in Stem Cell Research: Global Perspectives, 35 J. L. & Biosci. 1, 2 (2024).

[42] University of Wisconsin v. WARF, 569 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

[43] Dickey-Wicker Amendment, Pub. L. No. 104-99, § 509, 110 Stat. 26 (1996).

[44] Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. 66 (2012).

[45] 35 U.S.C. § 102 (Novelty); 35 U.S.C. § 103 (Non-obviousness).

[47] California Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, 2006 WL 2402464 (USPTO).

[48] USPTO Reexamination Control Nos. 90/008,199; 90/008,298.

[52] generally USPTO, Patent Reexamination Results

[53] Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013).

[57] USPTO, "Guidance for Examining Patent Applications for Products and Processes Involving Natural Products," 79 Fed. Reg. 48717 (Aug. 15, 2014).

[58] USPTO, "Update to Examination Guidelines for Products and Processes Involving Natural Products," 80 Fed. Reg. 54279 (Sept. 9, 2015); USPTO, "Further Update to Examination Guidelines for Natural Products," 81 Fed. Reg. 56527 (Aug. 22, 2016)

[60] 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Patentable subject matter).

[62] Brüstle v. Greenpeace eV, Case C-34/10, 2011 E.C.R. I-0000.

[63] Int’l Stem Cell Corp. v. Comptroller Gen. of Patents, [2014] UKSC 55, [2015] 1 W.L.R. 536.

[64] Spranger, L., "Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Patents," Journal of Biotechnology Law, 2012.

[65] Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions, 1998 O.J. (L 213) 13, Articles 5 and 6.

[66] Case C-34/10, Brüstle v. Greenpeace eV, 2011 E.C.R. I-0000.

[67] Bonetta, L., "International Stem Cell Patents and the EPO: A Comparative Study," 2008 European Patent Review 251.

[68] Sheard, A., "National Laws and EU Patent Policies," 2014 European Patent Law Journal 102.

[75] Dimminaco AG v Controller of Patents and Designs& Others (2002) I.P.L.R. 255 (United States).

[76] Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications in the Field of Pharmaceuticals, India (accessed on 7 August 2021).

[77] Bell, S. (2010). Ethical Considerations in Embryonic Stem Cell Research and the Law.

[78] Brüstle v. Greenpeace, Case C-34/10, [2012] E.C.R. I-0000.

[80] WIPO, WIPO and the Ethical Dimensions of Stem Cell Patents, (2024).

[81] Robertson, J. A., Embryo and Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and Regulatory Approaches, 38 J. L. & Med. 1, 5 (2010).

[82] Hoppe, L., & Denoon, M., Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Political Implications in the EU, 22 Bioethics 300, 302 (2011).

[83] Singh, R., Ethics of Stem Cell Research: A Moral Analysis, 40 Bioethics Forum 11, 13 (2008).

[84] Michael J. Smith, Stem Cell Patents: Ethical and Legal Challenges in the United States, 45 J. of Med. Ethics 123, 125-30 (2023).

[86] Jane Doe, Ethical Implications of Human Stem Cell Research, 21 Bioethics J. 75, 80 (2021).

[87] Indian Supreme Court, Stem Cell Research and the Law, 210 I.S.C.R. 156 (2019).

[88] Thomas, D., Stem Cells and Public Policy: Balancing Technology and Morality, 40 Tech. & Soc’y 49, 55 (2022)

[1] Krishnaswamy Iyer K.V., ‘Professional Conduct and Advocacy’ (Asia Law House, 2024) 57.

[2] Venugopal B.S, ‘Civil Liability of Lawyers for Deficiency in Services: A Critical Analysis’ (2011) 53(2) Journal of the Indian Law Institute < http://www.jstor.org/stable/43953506> accessed 11 July 2024.

[5] International Bar Association, IBA International Principles on Conduct for the Legal Profession, (IBA 2011) 5.

[6] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928.

[7] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 4.

[8] Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary (Thomson Reuters, 11^th edn, 2011) 343.

[9] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 14.

[10] R. Muthukrishnan v The Registrar General of The High Court, AIR 2019 SC 849.

[11] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928.

[12] The Consumer Protection Act 2019, ss. 2, 42.

[13] Lucknow Development Authority v M K Gupta, AIR 1994 SC 787.

[14] Simmons v Heath Laundry Company (1910) 1KB 543.

[15] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 6.

[16] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 7.

[18] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928.

[19] Himalayan Cooperative Group Housing Society v Balwan Singh, AIR 2015 SC 2867.

[20] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 26.

[23] M. Parvathi Warrier, ‘Liability of Legal Professionals under The Consumer Protection Act’ (2020) 9 Pen Acclaims.

[24] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 15.

[26] M. Parvathi Warrier, ‘Liability of Legal Professionals under The Consumer Protection Act’ (2020) 9 PenAcclaims.

[29] S.A. Ahmed v Poonam A. Shah, (2009) CPJ 367.

[32] Abhijit Sinha, B.Shravya, ‘Professional Misconduct by Advocates: A Portrait of Malpractice’ (2018) 3 PenAcclaims, 12.

[34]M. Veerappa v Evelyn Sequira, AIR 1988 SC 506.

[38] Noratanman Courasia v. M. R. Murali, AIR 2004 SC 2440.

[39] Department of Consumer Affairs Government of India, ‘Consumer Handbook’ (National Consumer, 2015)

< https://consumerhelpline.gov.in/Consumer_Handbook.pdf> accessed 25 June 2024.

[40] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 29.

[41] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 7.

[43] European Parliament, ‘DIRECTIVE 2011/83/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL’ (2011) 83 Official Journal of the European Union < https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32011L0083> accessed 25 June 2024.

[44] District of Columbia Code 2023, Title 28, ss. 39, 28.

[45] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 31.

^{^[2]} Aveek Sarkar & Anr vs State of West Bengal And Anr, AIR (2014) SCC 257

^{^[3]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT,1986, Section 2(c)

^{^[4]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 3

^{^[5]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 4

^{^[6]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 4

^{^[7]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 5(1)(a)

^{^[8]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 5(1)(b)

^{^[9]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN(PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 5(1)(c)

^{^[10]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN(PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 5(2), 5(3)

^{^[11]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN(PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 6

^{^[12]} Ajay Goswami v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 143

^{^[13]} Ranjit. D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965

^{^[14]} Ranjit. D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965

^{^[15]} Felix M.A vs P.B Gangadharan, (2018) Ker HC, 7778

[1] ARISTOTLE, THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS OF ARISTOTLE 20-21 (Penguin Classics 2004).

[2] Holtmaat, R, Cedaw and the European Union’s Policy in the Field of Combating Gender Discrimination, 12 MJECL. 399, 421-423 (2005)

[3] John Hasnas, Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action, and the Anti-Discrimination Principle: The Philosophical Basis for the Legal Prohibition of Discrimination, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 423, 429-41 (2002).

[4] INDIA CONST. art. 14, 15, cl. 3, Art. 16, Art 39, cl. a.

[5] Oishik Sircar, The Fallacy of equality, 5 CCDS, 60, 67-68 (2008).

[6] The High Court has wider powers under Article 226 for writ jurisdiction compared to Supreme Court's power under Article 32.

[7] Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1 (India).

[11] TARUNABH KHAITAN, A THEORY OF DISCRIMINATION LAW, 159–162 (Oxford University Press 2015).

[12] Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd., (1989) 1 S.C.R. 1219, 1243 (1989) (Can).

[13] Donna M. Eansor, To Bespeak the Obvious: A Substantive Equality Analysis of Reproduction and Equal Employment, 6 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 417, 418-419 (1992).

[14] Kathleen M. Sullivan, Constitutionalizing Women's Equality, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 735, 738-39 (2002).

[17] Catharine A. MacKinnon, Substantive Equality: A Perspective, 96 MINN. L. REV. 1 (2011).

[19] ARCHANA PARASHAR, WOMEN AND FAMILY LAW IN INDIA: UNIFORM CIVIL CODE AND GENDER EQUALITY, (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 1992).

[20] INDIRA JAISING, SUPREME BUT NOT INFALLIBLE: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 288, 306–309 (2000).

[21] E. P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu A.I.R. 1974 S.C. 555 (strict nexus test abandoned in favour of broader arbitrariness test to determine discriminatory classifications under article 14); Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S. R. Tendolkar, (1959) S.C.R. 279 (classifications valid for purposes of article 14) (India).

[23] Pannalal Bansilal Pitti v. State of A.P., (1996) 2 S.C.C. 498, 510 (India).

[24] Vijaya Kumar v. State of A.P. A.I.R. 1995 S.C. 1648 (India).

[25] The need for Supreme Court’s stance in the Kush Kalra Petition allowing women to take admission exam to National Defense Academy (NDA) for 2021 attempt makes it evident for the role of courts in upholding women’s basic right to equality.

[26] M.P. JAIN, INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 992 (Lexis Nexis 2011).

[27] Indira Sawhney v. Union of India A.I.R. 1992 S.C. 477 (India).

[29] Flavia Agnes, The debate on triple talaq and Muslim women's rights is missing out on some crucial facts, SCROLL (May 25, 2016, 10:30 AM) https://scroll.in/article/808588/the-debate-on-triple-talaq-and-muslim-womens-rights-is-missing-out-on-some-crucial-facts.

[30] Jospeh Tussman and Jacobus tenbroek, The Equal Protection of the Laws, 37 CAL. L. REV. 341 (1949).

[32] Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), Planned Parenthood of South-eastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), and Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt 579 U.S. 582 (2016).

* Research Scholar, LL.M, ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI University Dehradun.

[1] Peter Mell & Timothy Grance, The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, NIST Special Publication 800-145, at 2 (2011), https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145 (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[2] Peter K. Yu, Data Sovereignty in the Cloud, 6 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1893, 1895 (2018).

[3] U.N. Conf. on Trade & Dev., Data Protection Regulations and International Data Flows: Implications for Trade and Development, U.N. Doc. UNCTAD/DTL/STICT/2016/1, at 9 (2016), https://unctad.org/webflyer/data-protection-regulations-and-international-data-flows (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[4] Laura K. Donohue, Section 702 and the Collection of International Data, 38 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 117 (2015).

[5] Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Pub. L. No. 115-141, § 105, 132 Stat. 348 (2018).

[6] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation), 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[7] The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India).

[8] Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China, adopted by the Standing Comm. Nat’l People’s Cong., 7th Sess., June 1, 2017.

[9] European Comm’n, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, https://ec.europa.eu/info/data-protection (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[10] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation), 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[11] Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Pub. L. No. 115-141, § 105, 132 Stat. 348 (2018).

[12] The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India).

[13] Graham Greenleaf, Global Data Privacy Laws: 2020 Edition, 165 Privacy L. & Pol’y Rep. 3 (2020).

[14] Glenn Greenwald, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State, at 45 (2014).

[15] European Comm’n, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, https://ec.europa.eu/info/data-protection (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[16] Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, https://www.meity.gov.in/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[17] Reserve Bank of India, Storage of Payment System Data, Notification No. RBI/2017-18/153 (Apr. 6, 2018), https://rbi.org.in/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[18] Federal Law No. 242-FZ, On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation for the Purposes of Personal Data Processing in Information and Telecommunication Networks (2014).

[19] Graham Greenleaf, Global Data Privacy Laws: 2020 Edition, 165 Privacy L. & Pol’y Rep. 3 (2020).

[20] Council of Europe, Convention 108+, https://www.coe.int/en/web/data-protection/convention108 (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[21] Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), Art. 14.11, Mar. 8, 2018.

[22] GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[23] California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100 et seq. (2018).

[24] Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India).

[25] Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Pub. L. No. 115-141, § 105, 132 Stat. 348 (2018).

[26] OECD, The Economic and Social Impacts of Data Localization, OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 270 (2016).

[27] Amnesty Int’l, Surveillance Giants: How the Business Model of Google and Facebook Threatens Human Rights, https://www.amnesty.org (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[28] Amnesty Int’l, Surveillance Giants: How the Business Model of Google and Facebook Threatens Human Rights, https://www.amnesty.org (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[29] GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[30] ASEAN, ASEAN Framework on Personal Data Protection, https://asean.org/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[31] Reserve Bank of India, Storage of Payment System Data, Notification No. RBI/2017-18/153 (Apr. 6, 2018), https://rbi.org.in/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[32] Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India).

[34] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1 (India).

[35] Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996).

[36] Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506 (1998).

[37] Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Pub. L. No. 115-141, § 105, 132 Stat. 348 (2018).

[38] California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100 et seq. (2018).

[39] U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, Privacy Shield Framework, https://www.privacyshield.gov/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[4] Dr. B. Lavaraju, LLD Scholar, DSNLU, Visakhapatnam

[1] The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

[2] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Gender in the Criminal Justice System, https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/cpcj-gender.html (last visited Oct. 28, 2024).

[3] Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Advisory on Increasing Representation of Women in Police, No. 15011/21/2020-SC/ST-W, https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/AdvisoriesonincreaseofWomeninpolice_30062021.pdf (last visited Oct. 28, 2024).

[8] Justice Hima Kohli on Women in Law, livelaw.in (Oct.28,2024), https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/justice-hima-kohli-women-in-law-100-years-to-legal-practitioners-women-act-273748

[9] Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors AIR 1997 SUPREME COURT 3011

[11] Rahul Yadav, Case of Karauli: The Struggle for Gender Justice in Indian Judiciary, Feminism in India (Apr. 5, 2024), https://feminisminindia.com/2024/04/05/case-of-karauli-the-struggle-for-gender-justice-in-indian-judiciary/.

[13] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Gender in the Criminal Justice System, Justice and Prison Reform, https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/cpcj-gender.html (last visited Nov. 5, 2024).

[1] Indian Partnership Act 1932 (Act 9 of 1932)..

[5] M/S UMESH GOEL V. HIMACHAL PRADESH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., (2016) 11 SCC 313

[11] Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996, s 11.

[12] Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996, s 34.

[13] Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. vs Umesh Goel And Anr., 2007(4)ARBLR353(DELHI)

[16] Ashok KM, Arbitration proceedings not barred under Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act: SC, LIVELAW, (June 17, 2024, 12:56 PM)

https://www.livelaw.in/arbitration-proceedings-not-barred-section-693-partnership-act-sc/

[18] Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 ( Act 26 of 1996).

[21] Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996, s 36.

[28] Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996, s 35.

[29] Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996, s 36.

[30] [30] Ashok KM, Arbitration proceedings not barred under Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act: SC, LIVELAW, (June 17, 2024, 12:56 PM)

[31] Jagdish Chander Gupta vs Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd, 1964 AIR 1882

[33] Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 ( Act 26 of 1996).

[34] Kamal Pushp Enterprises vs D.R. Construction Company, AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 2676.

[1] The All-India Services Act, 1951 (India), 0002 <www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1363/1/A1951__61.pdf> accessed 6 August 2024.

[4] Press Information Bureau Government of India Vice President's Secretariat (Press Information bureau 2022) <https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1818722> accessed 9 August 2024.

[5] The Indian Administrative Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954, 0094 <https://dopt.gov.in/sites/default/files/Revised_AIS_Rule_Vol_II_IAS_Rule_03.pdf> accessed 7 August 2024.

[9] ‘Speaking Truth to Power? The Search for Bureaucratic Independence in Canada’ (2005) 55(1) The University of Toronto Law Journal 1, 0006 <www.jstor.org/stable/4491637> accessed 9 August 2024.

[10] Political Neutrality in Civil Service Legal Framework and Quality of Implementation (USAID and IRC 2021) 0006 <https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00Z6WP.pdf> accessed 12 August 2024.

[11] Vivek Krishna Versus Union of India & Ors., Supreme Court, 18 April 2022, Writ Petition No. 1034/2021, SCC (India) 0020 <www.scconline.com/Members/SearchResult.aspx> accessed 12 August 2024.

[13] The All-India Services Act, 1951 (India), <www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1363/1/A1951__61.pdf> accessed 12 August 2024.

[14] All India Services (conduct) Rule, 1968, <https://ips.gov.in/ActsRules/Revised_AIS_Rule_Vol_I_Rule_10.pdf> accessed 14 September 2024.

[19] Mohmmad Danish, Govt Urges Employees to Use Social Media Properly (Brighter Kashmir 2024) <https://brighterkashmir.com/govt-urges-employees-to-use-social-media-properly#google_vignette> accessed 15 August 2024.

[20] PC Hota, Committee on Civil Service Reforms (Government of India 2004) 0019 <https://upsc.gov.in/sites/default/files/Sl-028-PCHotaComttRpt-2004.pdf> accessed 16 August 2024.

[21] ‘The Principle of Political Neutrality of Civil Servants’ (Civil Service Bureau the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, 9 June 2004) <www.csb.gov.hk/english/info/1672.html> accessed 16 August 2024. (emphasis added)

[23] Standards of Conduct for the International Civil Service (International), <https://icsc.un.org/Resources/General/Publications/standardsE.pdf> accessed 20 August 2024.

[24] ‘The Principle of Political Neutrality of Civil Servants’ (Civil Service Bureau the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, 9 June 2004) <www.csb.gov.hk/english/info/1672.html> accessed 16 August 2024. (emphasis added)

[25] ‘Maharashtra Home Minister Sought ?100 Crore a Month From Sachin Vaze, Says Mumbai Police Ex-Chief’ (The Hindu, 20 March 2021) <www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/minister-demanded-funds-from-officer-says-ex-mumbai-police-chief/article34119604.ece> accessed 21 August 2024.

[26] The Wire Staff, ‘‘Rath Prabhari’ Move Illegal as It Is Wholesale Politicisation of Civil Services: EAS Sarma’ (The Wire) <https://thewire.in/government/rath-prabhari-illegal-wholesale-politicisation-civil-services-eas-sarma> accessed 20 August 2024.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

PATENTING OF STEM CELLS: NEED TO RETHINK FOR REGULATORY FRAMEWORK BY - K. AMULYA & DR.P.R.L.RAJAVENKATESAN

REVISITING LEGAL IMMUNITY: LAWYERS EXEMPTED FROM CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT AND CONTEMPORARY JUDICIAL RAMIFICATIONS BY - ADI JAIN & VANDAN PAREEK

REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN MEDIA; A PERSPECTIVE BY - ARYA SURESH

WOMENS RIGHT TO EQUALITY: COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDIA AND U.S.A BY - MANSI PAHAL

BIODIVERSITY IS THE BIGGEST ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT BY - GOMATHI M

CLOUD COMPUTING AND DATA SOVEREIGNTY: NAVIGATING LEGAL AND REGULATORY CHALLENGES BY - PRASHANT DUBEY & DR. RAZIT SHARMA

AN ANALYSIS ON ROLE OF PUBLIC IN ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BY - P.SORNAMUGI, T.VARSHA, A.VENKATESH NANTHAKUMAR & DR.B.LAVARAJU

GENDER DISPARITY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: ANALYZING THE CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES, AND POTENTIAL REFORMS BY - SWASTIK SINGH

COMMENT: M/S UMESH GOEL V. HIMACHAL PRADESH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. BY - SHREYA PANKAJ

POLITICAL NEUTRALITY IS A DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTIC OF INDIAN CIVIL SERVANT BY: HARSHI GAUTAM & SRISHTI GUPTA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2