INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

ROLE OF ITLOS IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON URGENT PROCEDURES BY - DR. M. BIRUNTHADEVI

Authors: DR. M. BIRUNTHADEVI

Registration ID: 108608 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8608

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: birunthadevi86.law@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-95612258/ROLE OF ITLOS IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT WITH SPECIAL E

COHABITATION WITHOUT MARRIAGE: ANALYSING LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIPS THROUGH THE LENS OF INDIAN PERSONAL LAWS BY - KANGAN CHAWLA & ISHIKA JAISWAL

Authors: KANGAN CHAWLA & ISHIKA JAISWAL

Registration ID: 108607 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8606 & IJLRA8607

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: kangan140@gmail.com & ishika.jaiswal2004@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-52719542/COHABITATION WITHOUT MARRIAGE: ANALYSING LIVE-IN R

RIGHT TO LIVE IN POLLUTION FREE ENVIRONMENT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS WITH REFERENCE TO ARTICLE 21 BY - DR. SHIKHA DHIMAN

Authors: DR. SHIKHA DHIMAN

Registration ID: 108605 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8605

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shikha.laws@gndu.ac.in

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-69743441/RIGHT TO LIVE IN POLLUTION FREE ENVIRONMENT: A CRI

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY BY - MS. BHUVANESHWARI.G & MR. GOWTHAM.M

Authors: MS. BHUVANESHWARI.G & MR. GOWTHAM.M

Registration ID: 108603 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8603 & IJLRA8604

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vmgowtham.murugesan@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-28448739/INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

AN ANALYSIS OF “THE IMPORTANCE OF BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE”: IN COMMEMORATION OF THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LANDMARK JUDGEMENT ‘KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA BY - YOGITA KHATRI

Authors: YOGITA KHATRI

Registration ID: 108602 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8602

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: yogitakhatri22276@rgnul.ac.in

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-81131351/AN ANALYSIS OF “THE IMPORTANCE OF BASIC STRUCTUR

PROBLEMATIC APPROACH TO PUBLIC EQUITY SHAREHOLDERS: SEBI V. IBC BY - HANAH VARGHESE

Authors: HANAH VARGHESE

Registration ID: 108601 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8601

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: hanah.varghese@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-29119896/PROBLEMATIC APPROACH TO PUBLIC EQUITY SHAREHOLDERS

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (A GOLDEN KEY TO SECURE JUSTICE FOR THE POOR) BY - VEDANTI GONGLE

Authors: VEDANTI GONGLE

Registration ID: 108600 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8600

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vedantigongle15@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-92182628/PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (A GOLDEN KEY TO SECURE

ENTANGLED ROOTS: UNRAVELING THE THREADS OF SAPINDA RELATIONSHIPS IN HINDU AND MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS BY - SOUMYA CHOPRA

Authors: SOUMYA CHOPRA

Registration ID: 108599 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8599

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: soumyachopra1112@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-95831378/ENTANGLED ROOTS: UNRAVELING THE THREADS OF SAPINDA

“BEYOND THE BOOKS: EMPOWERING YOUNG MINDS THROUGH LEGAL EDUCATION” BY - NAVREET KAMAL KAUR

Authors: NAVREET KAMAL KAUR

Registration ID: 108598 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8598

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: navreetkkaur9@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-94286799/BEYOND THE BOOKS: EMPOWERING YOUNG MINDS THROUGH L

CURRENT LEGISLATIVE STALEMATES AND THE NEED TO RETHINK GOVERNOR’S DISCRETION UNDER ARTICLE 200 BY – NAVYA & HARSHITA LORGRE

Authors: NAVYA & HARSHITA LORGRE

Registration ID: 108597 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8596 & IJLRA8597

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: navya@nlujodhpur.ac.in & harshita.logre@nlujodhpur.ac.in

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-59684739/CURRENT LEGISLATIVE STALEMATES AND THE NEED TO RET

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr 2010 (5) SCC 600

[2] Payal Sharma v. Superintendent Nari Niketan AIR 2001 All 254.

[3] S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr 2010 (5) SCC 600.

[4] A. Dinohamy v. W.L. Blahamy, AIR 1927 P.C. 185.

[6] D.Velusamy v s D.Patchaiammal AIR 2011 Supreme Court 479.

[9] Wazida Rahman, Live-In-Relationship And Personal Laws: A Contemporary Study, Vol. 3, Issues 3-4, NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies, 29, 2018, https://www.nujs.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/File-54.pdf .

[10] Rashida Khatoon v S K Islam AIR 2005 Ori 57.

[11] Chanmuniya v Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha and Anr (2011) 1 SCC, 141.

[12] D.Velusamy v s D.Patchaiammal AIR 2011 Supreme Court 479.

[13] Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, 2005, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 2005 (India).

[14] Narayan Jagluji Thool and Ors v. Mala Chandan Wani AIR 2015 Bombay 36.

[15] Payal Sharma v. Superintendent Nari Niketan AIR 2001 All 254.

[16] Indra Sarma vs. V.K.V. Sarma, (2013) 15 SCC 775.

[18] Vidyadhari v. Sukhrana Bai AIR 2008 SC 1420 (India).

[19] Madan Mohan Singh v. Rajni Kant 2010 (9) SCC 209.

[20] Bharata Matha v. R. Vijaya Renganathan 2010 AIR SCW 3503.

[21] SPS Balasubramanyam v. Sruttayan 1994 AIR 133.

[22]Bharata Matha & Ors. v R. Vijaya Renganathan & Ors. 2010 AIR SCW 3503.

[24] Jinia Keotin & Ors. v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi & Ors AIR Online 2002 SC 635.

[25] Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ,§ 16, No. 25, Acts of Parliament, 1955 (India).

[26] Tulsa & Ors v. Durghatiya & Ors 2008 AIR SCW 1148.

[27] Revanasiddappa & Anr. vs Mallikarjun & Ors Civil Appeal No. of 2011.

[28] Dimple Gupta v. Rajiv Gupta 2007 AIR SCW 6651.

[29] Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India 1999 AIR SCW 811.

[1] Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Anr. (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[2] Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1965 SC 845.

[3] Noorani, A. G., Ninth Schedule and the Supreme Court, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY (Mar. 3-9, 2007) http://www.jstor.org/stable/4419299.

[5] Sri Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India, AIR 1951 SC 458.

[6] Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1965 SC 845.

[7] Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, (1967) SCR (2) 762.

[8] The Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971.

[9] The Constitution (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act, 1971.

[10] The Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971.

[11] The Constitution (Twenty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1972.

[12] Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, (1967) SCR (2) 762.

[13] Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union Of India, AIR 1970 SC 564.

[14] Kesavananda Bharti v. Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461; Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SC 2299; Minerva

Mills v.Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 1789; S.P. Sampat Kumar v. India, AIR 1987 SC 386; Sambamurthy v.

A.P, AIR 1987 SC 663.

[15] Sikri, J. Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Anr. (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[20] All India Judges Association v. Union of India & Ors., 2023 SCC OnLine SC 673.

[21] Madras Bar Association v. Union of India, (2021) 7 SCC 369.

[23] Navtej Singh Johar and Ors. v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 4321.

[24] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors., (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[26] Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 3.

[27] Indian Young Lawyers Association and Ors. v. The State of Kerala and Ors., (2019) 11 SCC 1.

[29] Anuradha Bhasin v. Union Of India, AIR 2020 SC 1308.

[1] Dewan Housing Finance Corporation v. Union of India W.P. 3157 of 2021 (Ind)

[3] DBS Bank Ltd Singapore v. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd and another, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9133 OF 2019 (Ind)

[5] Securities and Exchange Board of India, Recalibration of threshold for Minimum Public Shareholding norms, enhanced disclosures in Companies which undergo Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) ( https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/meetingfiles/dec-2020/1608621922552_1.pdf

[7] Binani Industries Limited Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr (2018) SCC Online NCLAT 521 (Ind)

[8] K. N Rajakumar v. V. Nagarajan & Ors CIVIL APPEAL NO.2901 OF 2021 (Ind)

[9] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, No. 31 of 2016, § 53 (Ind).

[10] Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee, Report of the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee, Volume I: Rationale and Design (Nov. 4, 2015), https://ibbi.gov.in/BLRCReportVol1_04112015.pdf.

[12] Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association & Ors. V. NBCC (India) Ltd. & Ors (Ind)

[13] India Resurgence ARC Private Limited v. Amit Metaliks Limited & Another, 2021 SCC Online SC 409 (Ind)

[14] DBS Bank Ltd Singapore v. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd and another, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9133 OF 2019 (Ind)

[15] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, No. 31 of 2016, § 30 (2) (e) (Ind)

[16] Dewan Housing Finance Corporation v. Union of India W.P. 3157 of 2021 (Ind)

[18] Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited (through authorized signatory) v. Satish Kumar Gupta and Others (2020) 8 SCC 531 (Ind)

[19] Rajat Sethi and Aditi Agarwal, Case Note: Judgement of the Supreme Court in the Essar Steel Case, SR Insights, SNRLaw.

[20] Bank of India v. Pradeep Kumar Goenka (RP) Comp.App.(AT)(Ins) 342/2022 (Ind)

[22] Kishorebhai Khamanchonil Goyal vs State of Gujarat (2003) L2 SCC 274 (Ind)

[24] Bhanu Ram v. HDN Diaries and Allied Limited CP No. IB 547 (PB)/2018 (Ind)

[26] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, No. 31 of 2016, § 53 (Ind).

[27] The report of the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee Volume 1: Rationale and Design (November 2015) https://ibbi.gov.in/BLRCReportVol1_04112015.pdf

[28] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, No. 31 of 2016, § 29A (Ind).

[29] Arcelor Mittal India Private Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2019) 2 SCC 1 (Ind)

[31] Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [2019] 3 S.C.R. 535 (Ind).

[5] Pavement Dwellers Report no. 138 available at https://www.advocatekhoj.com, last seen on 17/10/24.

[6] Miss Olga Tellis Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay AIR 1985 SC 805-1985 (3) SCC 545

[8] The State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Parents of student of medical college AIR 1985 SC 910, 1985 (3) SCC 169.

[5] AM Khayat, Consanguineous Marriage and Its Association With Genetic Disorders in Saudi Arabia: A Review,

National Library of Medicine, found at https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10924896/

[6] Gareth Baynam, Stigma associated with genetic testing for rare diseases—causes and recommendations,

National Library of Medicine, found at https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11024281/

[1] Gupta, Madhu Kumari; Mohapatra, Subrajeet; Mahanta, Prakash Kumar, Juvenile’s Delinquent Behavior, Risk Factors, and Quantitative Assessment Approach: A Systematic Review, 47(4) IJCM (2021)

[2] Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, No. 32, Acts of Parliament, 2012 (India).

[3] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[4] Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 2005 (India).

[5] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, No. 2, Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).

[6] Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 2013 (India).

[7] Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, GOI, https://doj.gov.in/legal-literacy-and-legal-awareness-programme-lllp/ (last visited October 25, 2024).

[8] Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, GOI, https://doj.gov.in/legal-literacy-legal-awareness/ (last visited October 25, 2024).

[15] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[16] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 67, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[17] Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 § 15, No. 32, Acts of Parliament, 2012 (India).

[19] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 69A, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[20] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 66E, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[21] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 70, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[22] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 43, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[23] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 72, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[24] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 66, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[25] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 75, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[28] Indian Contract Act, 1872 § 10, No. 9, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

[29] Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 § 7, No. 8, Acts of Parliament, 1890 (India).

[30] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 66, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[31] Information Technology Act, 2000 § 75, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[1] J. P. Suda, The Role of the Governor, 29 IJPS 62, 63 (1968).

[2] N. R. Deshpande, The Role of the Governor in the Parliamentary Government in the States, 20 IJPS 15, 17 (1959).

[3] India Const. art. 155.

[4] India Const. art. 153.

[5] Governor's Role, 40 Economic and Political Weekly 4488, 4488 (2005).

[6] Amal Chandra, Governor Vs Government : Constitutional quandary in Kerala, Deccan Herald (February 03, 2024). See at: “https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/governor-vs-government-constitutional-quandary-in-kerala-2878190”

[7] M R Madhavan, Governor versus state: Why tensions are rising again, The Times of India (March 11, 2023). See at: “https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/governor-versus-state-why-tensions-are-rising-again/”

[8] Rahul Unnikrishnan, Governors in Indian States: A Colonial Imprint, LiveMint (March 25, 2017). See at: “http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/VCnOT1WVlTs4STlW7Z9cuN/Governors-in-Indian-states-A-colonial-imprint.html” (Last visited on May 2, 2017).

[9] Yadul Krishna, Abolishing Governor's Post Isn't a Good Idea. What's Needed is a Rethink, The Wire (November 17, 2023). See at: “https://thewire.in/government/abolishing-governors-post-isnt-a-good-idea-whats-needed-is-a-rethink”

[10] H. M. Rajashekara, The Nature of Indian Federalism: A Critique, 37 Asian Survey 245, 247 (1997). See at: “https://doi.org/10.2307/2645661”

[11] Vinod Rai, Governors Cannot Delay Bills Indefinitely: Landmark Judgement by India’s Supreme Court, ISAS Insights, 739 (November 29, 2023). See at: “https://www.isas.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ISAS-Insight-739.pdf”)

[12] Singh, Dalip. The Role of the Governor Under the Constitution and the Working of Coalition Governments, 29 IJPS 51, 54 (1968).

[13] India Const. art. 163, § 1.

[14] Alice Jacob, Centre-State Governmental Relations in the Indian Federal System, 10 JILI 583, 592 (1968).

[15] India Const. art. 200.

[16] India Const. art. 201.

[17] Shreeram Chandra Dash, The Power of Assent and President’s Role in India, 22 IJPS 319, 319 ( 1961).

[18] S. A. H. Haqqi, The Role of the Governor, 22 IJPS 337, 339 (1961).

[19] Rajni Goyal, The Governor: Constitutional Position and Political Reality, 53 IJPS 505, 510 (1992).

[20] Kanchan Vasdev, Amid row, Punjab Governor Reserves Three Bills for President’s Consideration, The Indian Express (December 7, 2023). See at: “https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chandigarh/amid-row-punjab-gov-reserves-three-bills-for-presidents-consideration-9057603/”

[22] State of Punjab v. Governor of Punjab, (2024) 1 SCC 407.

[24] Abraham Thomas, Punjab Government Moves SC Against Governor Over Delay in Nod to Bills, Hindustan Times (November 01, 2023). See at: “https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/others/punjab-government-moves-sc-against-governor-over-delay-in-nod-to-bills-101698778886187.html”

[26] Utkarsh Anand, SC pulls up Punjab Governor, Doesn’t Spare Government Either, Hindustan Times (November 11, 2023). See at: “https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sc-pulls-up-punjab-guv-doesn-t-spare-govt-either-101699640516569.html”

[27] Ashmita Saha, ‘Can’t keep bill pending indefinitely’: Supreme Court to Punjab Governor, India Today (November 24, 2023). See at: “https://www.indiatoday.in/law/story/supreme-court-punjab-governor-banwarilal-purohit-cji-punjab-government-2466882-2023-11-24”

[28] State of Punjab v. Governor of Punjab, (2024) 1 SCC 384, 395.

[29] Supra note 28, 396.

[30] Supra note 28, 396.

[31] Supra note 28, 397.

[32] Supra note 28, 397.

[33] Gargi Bindal, State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab & Another: Case Comment, CALJ, (2024). See at: “https://www.calj.in/post/state-of-punjab-v-principal-secretary-to-the-governor-of-punjab-another-case-comment”

[36] Padmakshi Sharma, ‘Matter Of Serious Concern’: Supreme Court On Tamil Nadu Governor Not Clearing Bills & Files, LiveLaw (November 10, 2023). See at: “https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/matter-of-serious-concern-supreme-court-on-tamil-nadu-governor-not-clearing-bills-files-242060”

[38] SC Questions Tamil Nadu Governor's Three-Year Delay in Disposing of Bills Sent for Assent, The Wire (November 21, 2023). See at: “https://thewire.in/law/sc-questions-tamil-nadu-governors-three-year-delay-in-disposing-of-bills-sent-for-assent”

[40] Bhadra Sinha, Can’t withhold assent & then refer to President — SC asks TN governor to resolve impasse over bills, The Print (December 01, 2023). See at: “https://theprint.in/judiciary/cant-withhold-assent-then-refer-to-president-sc-asks-tn-governor-to-resolve-impasse-over-bills/1867039/”

[42] SC Says ‘No Question’ of TN Governor Referring 10 Bills to President After Withholding Assent, The Wire (December 01, 2023). See at: “https://thewire.in/law/sc-tn-governor-10-bills-impasse”

[44] Supra note 28, 397.

[47] Amid legal challenge over pending Bills, Kerala Governor approves one, sends 7 for President’s approval, The Indian Express (November 29, 2023). See at: “https://indianexpress.com/article/india/kerala/pending-bills-kerala-governor-approves-one-7-for-president-approval-9046142/”

[50] S. L. Verma, Installation of Federal Authority in the Indian Political System: Quest for a Real Federation, 47 IJPS 247, 250 (1986).

[51] Supra note 17, at 324.

[52] India Const. art. 245, § 1.

[55] Supra note 28, 398.

[56] Supra note 1, at 64.

[57] Supra note 2, at 18.

[58] Justice R S Sarkaria Commission (n 23) Chapter IV.

[59] Agnidipto Tarafder & Avantik Tamta, Reassessing the Role of the Rajpramukh: An Analysis of the Continuing Relevance of the Governor’s Position, 10 NUJS Law Review (2017).

[61] Justice M. M. Punchhi Commission (n 61) Chapter IV.

[62] Supra note 2, at 16.

[63] M V Pylee, The Governor and the Constitution, 2 Economic and Political Weekly 1367, 1371 (1967).

[64] Granville Austin, The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation 207, (Clarendon Press 1966).

[65] K. H. Cheluva Raju, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and Making of the Constitution: A Case Study of Indian Federalism, 52 IJPS 153, 161 (1991).”

[66] A. K. Ghosal, State Governor in the Constitution and Before, 12 IJPS 20, 29 (1951).

[67] Anmol Jain & Sayantani Bagchi, Marking the Imprecise Territory of Gubernatorial Discretion to Call for a Trust Vote, 6:3 Indian Law Review 217, 218 (2022). (at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24730580.2021.1967655)

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

ROLE OF ITLOS IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON URGENT PROCEDURES BY - DR. M. BIRUNTHADEVI

COHABITATION WITHOUT MARRIAGE: ANALYSING LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIPS THROUGH THE LENS OF INDIAN PERSONAL LAWS BY - KANGAN CHAWLA & ISHIKA JAISWAL

RIGHT TO LIVE IN POLLUTION FREE ENVIRONMENT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS WITH REFERENCE TO ARTICLE 21 BY - DR. SHIKHA DHIMAN

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY BY - MS. BHUVANESHWARI.G & MR. GOWTHAM.M

AN ANALYSIS OF “THE IMPORTANCE OF BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE”: IN COMMEMORATION OF THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LANDMARK JUDGEMENT ‘KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA BY - YOGITA KHATRI

PROBLEMATIC APPROACH TO PUBLIC EQUITY SHAREHOLDERS: SEBI V. IBC BY - HANAH VARGHESE

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (A GOLDEN KEY TO SECURE JUSTICE FOR THE POOR) BY - VEDANTI GONGLE

ENTANGLED ROOTS: UNRAVELING THE THREADS OF SAPINDA RELATIONSHIPS IN HINDU AND MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS BY - SOUMYA CHOPRA

“BEYOND THE BOOKS: EMPOWERING YOUNG MINDS THROUGH LEGAL EDUCATION” BY - NAVREET KAMAL KAUR

CURRENT LEGISLATIVE STALEMATES AND THE NEED TO RETHINK GOVERNOR’S DISCRETION UNDER ARTICLE 200 BY – NAVYA & HARSHITA LORGRE

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[21] Madras Bar Association v. Union of India, (2021) 7 SCC 369.

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2