INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

WHITE-COLLAR CRIME AND REGULATORY GAPS: EXPLORING LEGAL CHALLENGES AND ENFORCEMENT ISSUES BY - MD. JEWEL ALI

Authors: CMD. JEWEL ALI

Registration ID: 108586 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8586

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: itsjewelali@gmail.com

Page No : 30 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-79883531/WHITE-COLLAR CRIME AND REGULATORY GAPS: EXPLORING

GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BASIC PRINCIPLES OF TRIPS AND THE ERA OF BTAS AND FTAS- A CASE FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. BY - SHIKHAR SINGH

Authors: SHIKHAR SINGH

Registration ID: 108585 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8585

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shikhars030@gmail.com

Page No : 08 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-28651412/GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BASIC PRINCIPLES OF TRIPS A

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: UNLOCKING LEGAL INTRICACIES BY - MADHAV GOSWAMI & MUGDHA GARG

Authors: MADHAV GOSWAMI & MUGDHA GARG

Registration ID: 108583 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8583 & IJLRA8584

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: madhavgoswami515@gmail.com & mugdhagarg08@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-77453461/CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS:

A STUDY ON COMPULSORY LICENSING OF PATENT: INDIAN PERSPECTIVE. BY - CHITRA C

Authors: CHITRA C

Registration ID: 108582 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8582

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: chitrac11898.cc@gmail.com

Page No : 30 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-74626486/A STUDY ON COMPULSORY LICENSING OF PATENT: INDIAN

EVOLUTION OF WOMENS PROPERTY RIGHTS: A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS UNDER HINDU SUCCESSION ACTS IN INDIA BY - ASHWANI KUMAR, NITESH KUMAR SINGH & ANUJA PIMPALAPURE

Authors: ASHWANI KUMAR, NITESH KUMAR SINGH & ANUJA PIMPALAPURE

Registration ID: 108579 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8579, IJLRA8580 & IJLRA8581

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aashwanikumar11431@gmail.com & niteshsinghbhu9@gmail.com

Page No : 46 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-24842335/EVOLUTION OF WOMENS PROPERTY RIGHTS: A HISTORICAL

DISNEY-RELIANCE MERGER: POWER, PROFIT, AND THE FUTURE OF INDIAN MEDIA BY - ANSHIKA SHAHI & AYANTIKA BHATTACHARYYA

Authors: ANSHIKA SHAHI & AYANTIKA BHATTACHARYYA

Registration ID: 108577 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8577 & IJLRA8578

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: anshika.shahi2002@gmail.com & ayantikabhattacharyya9@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-21996941/DISNEY-RELIANCE MERGER: POWER, PROFIT, AND THE FUT

BARRIERS TO LEGAL AID FOR WOMEN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND GLOBAL BEST PRACTICES BY: VEDANSHI VERMA & MS. ANUGYA RANI,

Authors: VEDANSHI VERMA & MS. ANUGYA RANI,

Registration ID: 108575 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8575 & IJLRA8576

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vedanshiverma5555@gmail.com & a.rani@dme.ac.in

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-24438361/BARRIERS TO LEGAL AID FOR WOMEN: A COMPARATIVE STU

STRENGTHENING ANTI-DEFECTION LAW IN INDIA: A FRAMEWORK FOR ELECTORAL INTEGRITY BY - SHUBHADA PATIL

Authors: SHUBHADA PATIL

Registration ID: 108574 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8574

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shubhadapatil25feb@gmail.com

Page No : 33 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-52618642/STRENGTHENING ANTI-DEFECTION LAW IN INDIA: A FRAME

A RECENT RESEARCH ON SOCIAL INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS CONVERSIONS AMONG TRIBES IN BIHAR BY - DR. RAMESH KUMAR SHUKLA & RUPA JHA

Authors: DR. RAMESH KUMAR SHUKLA & RUPA JHA

Registration ID: 108572 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8572 & IJLRA8573

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: advisorshukla@gmail.com & rupajha89@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-62938379/A RECENT RESEARCH ON SOCIAL INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS

RIGHTS OF TRANSFEREE UNDER SECTION 53-A OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 BY - ARUNAV BHATTACHARJYA

Authors : ARUNAV BHATTACHARJYA

Registration ID : 10134G | Published Paper ID: IJLRA134G

Year : June-2021 | Volume : 2 | Issue : 2

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : arunavb15@nluassam.ac.in

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-46923111/RIGHTS OF TRANSFEREE UNDER SECTION 53-A OF THE TRA

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] LL.M. Student at Department of Law, Aliah University, Kolkata.

[2] Brandon L. Garrett, Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations 35 (2014).

[3] United States v. Wise, 550 F.2d 1180 (9th Cir. 1977).

[5] Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (2006).

[7] United States v. Skilling, 561 U.S. 358 (2010).

[8] United States v. Stewart, 433 F.3d 273 (2d Cir. 2006).

[9] Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1.

[10] Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. § 1030.

[11] Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, Pub. L. No. 116-283.

[12] Michael Lewis, The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine (2010).

[13] John Braithwaite, Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry 17 (1984).

[14] Gary S. Becker, Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach, 76 J. Pol. Econ. 169-217 (1968).

[15] Robert F. Meier & Weldon T. Johnson, Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of

Conformity, 42 Am. Sociological Rev. 292 (1977).

[16] Robert K. Merton, Social Structure and Anomie, 3 Am. Sociological Rev. 672-82 (1938).

[17] James William Coleman, The Criminal Elite: The Sociology of White-Collar Crime 47-51 (2002).

[18] See United States v. Lay and Skilling, 561 U.S. 358 (2010).

[19] Edwin H. Sutherland, White Collar Crime (1949).

[20] William S. Laufer, Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds: The Failure of Corporate Criminal Liability (2006).

[21] United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 544 U.S. 696 (2005).

[22] Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (1986).

[24] Orin S. Kerr, The Problem of Perspective in Internet Law, 91 Geo.L.J. 357 (2003).

[25] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Apr. 27, 2016, 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[26] Sarah Jane Hughes & Stephen T. Middlebrook, Advancing a Framework for Regulating Cryptocurrency

Payments Intermediaries, 32 Yale J. on Reg. 495 (2015).

[27] Financial Action Task Force, Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers: FATF Guidance, 2019.

[28] Aaron Wright & Primavera De Filippi, Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex

Cryptographia, 58 Hastings L.J. 1387 (2017).

[29] U.S. Dep’t of the Treasury, The American Families Plan Tax Compliance Agenda (2021).

[30] Financial Action Task Force, International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of

Terrorism & Proliferation, 2021.

[31] Andrew Burt, AI’s Potential to Expose – and Perpetuate – Corporate Crime, Harv. Bus. Rev. (Feb. 14, 2019).

[32] Tom C.W. Lin, Artificial Intelligence, Finance, and the Law, 88 Fordham L. Rev. 531 (2019).

[33] Ryan Calo, Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer and Roadmap, 51 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 399 (2017).

[34] Mary Kreiner Ramirez, The Science of White-Collar Crime: Where Have We Been and Where Should We

Go? 6 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 671 (2016).

[35] William S. Laufer, The Missing Account of Progressive Corporate Criminal Law, 14 N.Y.U. J. L. & Bus.

71 (2017).

[36] Mark A. Cohen, The Costs of Crime and Justice, 211 (2005).

[37] U.S. Gov’t Accountability Off., GAO-18-188, Securities and Exchange Commission: Improvements Needed

in Internal Controls and Performance Measures for Investigation, at 10 (2018).

[39] Samuel W. Buell, Capital Offenses: Business Crime and Punishment in America’s Corporate Age 39-44

(2016).

[40] Geoffrey Christopher Rapp, Beyond Protection: Invigorating Incentives for Sarbanes-Oxley Corporate and

Securities Fraud Whistleblowers, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 91 (2007).

[41] Kevin R. Reitz, Sentencing White-Collar Criminals, 75 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1243 (2002).

[42] U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, Federal Sentencing Guidelines Manual, ch. 8 (2021).

[43] U.S. Gov’t Accountability Off., GAO-09-358, SEC: Opportunities Exist to Improve Oversight of Self-

Regulatory Organizations (2009).

[44] Stuart P. Green, Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime 37-39 (2007).

[50] State v. Ramalinga Raju, Crim. Case No. 202 of 2015 (Special Court for Economic Offenses, Hyderabad).

[51] Nirav Modi Extradition Case, UK Extradition Hearing 2019-2021.

[52] India v. Vijay Mallya, UK Extradition Case No. 2017/0006 (Westminster Magistrates Court, 2017).

[53] National Company Law Tribunal, Union of India v. IL&FS Financial Services Ltd., NCLT Order,

Mumbai Bench (2018).

[54] Tarun Jain, Indian Legal System and the Problem of Delayed Justice, 27 Int'l J. Soc. Sci. & Human. Res.

54 (2018).

[55] Ashish Nanda, The Challenges of White-Collar Crime Enforcement in India, 15 Corp. L. Stud. 67 (2020).

[56] Neha Bhat, Political Influence and the Challenge of Prosecuting Financial Crime in India, 43 Asia-Pacific

L. Rev. 123 (2020).

[57] Aditi Verma, White-Collar Crime in India: Legal Challenges and the Role of Regulators, 9 Bus. L. Rev. 39

(2019).

[58] Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745; Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376.

[59] Sarbanes-Oxley Act § 302, 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (2002)

[60] Sarbanes-Oxley Act § 101, 15 U.S.C. § 7211 (2002).

[61] Lawrence A. Cunningham, The Sarbanes-Oxley Yawn: Heavy Rhetoric, Light Reform and It Just Might Work, 35 Conn. L. Rev. 915 (2003).

[62] Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1 (1977).

[63] Amy Deen Westbrook, Double Trouble: Collateral Shareholder Litigation Following Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Investigations, 73 Ohio St. L.J. 1217 (2012).

[64] Financial Action Task Force, International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of

Terrorism & Proliferation, 2021.

[65] Frederik Obermaier & Bastian Obermayer, The Panama Papers: Breaking the Story of How the Rich and

Powerful Hide Their Money (2016).

[66] United Nations Convention Against Corruption, Oct. 31, 2003, 2349 U.N.T.S. 41.

[67] Sally Engle Merry, Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice 132

(2006).

[68] OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions,

Dec. 17, 1997, 37 I.L.M. 1.

[69] Ethan A. Nadelmann, Cops Across Borders: The Internationalization of U.S. Criminal Law Enforcement 251-

55 (1993).

[70] McIntosh, Global Financial Integrity: Estimating Illicit Financial Flows Resulting from Corporate Tax Evasion

and Corruption, 25 Econ. & Pol’y Rev. 45 (2019).

[71] Mark Pieth & Radha Ivory, The OECD Convention on Bribery: A Commentary (2014).

[72] Ethan A. Nadelmann, Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society, 44 Int’l

Org. 479 (1990).

[73] Jan Wouters et al., International Law: A European Perspective 217-19 (2018).

[74] United States v. Lay and Skilling, 561 U.S. 358 (2010).

[75] William W. Bratton, Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value, 76 Tul. L. Rev. 1275 (2002).

[76] United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 544 U.S. 696 (2005).

[78] Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745.

[79] John C. Coffee Jr., Gatekeeper Failure and Reform: The Challenge of Fashioning Relevant Reforms, 84 B.U.

L. Rev. 301 (2004).

[80] United States v. Madoff, No. 09-cr-213, 2009 WL 1876997 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).

[81] SEC Office of Inspector General, Investigation of Failure of the SEC to Uncover Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi

Scheme, Case No. OIG-509 (Aug. 31, 2009).

[82] Dodd-Frank Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).

[83] Joel Seligman, Rethinking Securities Markets and Their Regulation: Dodd-Frank in Historical Perspective, 7

Harv. Bus. L. Rev. 1 (2017).

[84] United States v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 17-cv-04117, 2018 WL 1352515 (C.D. Cal. 2018).

[85] Jesse Eisinger, The Chickenshit Club: Why the Justice Department Fails to Prosecute Executives (2017).

[86] Patricia A. McCoy, Inside Job: The Assault on the Enforcement of Financial Regulation, 103 Iowa L. Rev.

545 (2018).

[87] Panama Papers: The Aftermath, BBC News (Apr. 2018).

[88] See United States v. Siemens AG, No. 08-cr-367 (D.D.C. 2008).

[89] John Coffee, Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Crisis of Underenforcement 142-45 (2020).

[91] Geoffrey Christopher Rapp, Mutiny by the Bounties? The Attempt to Reform Wall Street by the New

Whistleblower Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, 2012 BYU L. Rev. 73 (2012).

[92] Jennifer Arlen, Corporate Criminal Liability: Theory and Evidence, in Research Handbook on Corporate

Crime and Financial Misdeeds 144 (Jennifer Arlen ed., 2017).

[93] U.S. Gov’t Accountability Off., GAO-19-250, Securities and Exchange Commission: Actions Needed to

Strengthen Policies and Procedures for Managing Employee Misconduct (2019).

[95] Posner, The Concept of Regulatory Capture: A Short, Inglorious History, in Preventing Regulatory Capture:

Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It 49 (Daniel Carpenter & David A. Moss eds., 2013).

[96] Sarah Jane Hughes, Cryptocurrency Regulation and Enforcement, 73 Bus. Law. 1437 (2018).

[97] Paul B. Stephan, Cyberspace, Sovereignty, and Transnational Security: The Evolving International Law of

Cyberspace, 42 Geo. J. Int’l L. 585 (2011).

[1] Elizebeth Verky & Jithin Saji Isaac, Intellectual Property, Eastern Book Company (EBC), Second Edition, 2021.

[2] Feroz Ali Khader, The Law of Patents with special focus on Pharmaceuticals in India, Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2007.

[3] Rajeshkumar Acharya and Girishchandra Tanna, Compulsory Licensing Of Patents In India, SSRN, 2019.

[4] LOWIA PAUL, COMPULSORY LICENSING OF PATENTS IN INDIA, JETIR, Volume 6 Issue 3, March 2019.

[5] SHAMNAD BASHEER, The Compulsory License Regime in India, SSRN Publications, December 2020.

[6] Deepak Kumar Dash, A Review on the Indian Patent System and Its Implication on the Pharmaceutical Industry, JHSMR, 2023.

[7] Kaur A, Chaturvedi R. Compulsory Licensing of Drugs and Pharmaceuticals: Issues and Dilemma. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2015; 20): 279-287.

[8] Gupta R., Compulsory Licensing under TRIPS: How afar it Addresses Public Health Concerns in Developing Nations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2010; 15: 357-363.

[9] P. Narayanan, Patent law, (Eastern Law House, Fourth edition, 2017) pp 1-4.

[10] Dr. G.B. Reddy’s, “Intellectual Property Rights And The Law”, (Gogia Law Agency 2012)

[11] V.K.Ahuja, “Law Relating To Intellectual Property Rights” (LexisNexis Third edition 2017); pg, 577, Annex7

[12] Agreement on Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994) [hereinafter TRIPS Agreement] Article 31.

[13] TRIPS Agreement, Apr 15, 1994, Art 30 & Art 31.

[17] Prabhat Kumar Saha, Aditi Mukherjee, Compulsory Licensing of Patent: Issues & Challenges, academic journal, 2019.

[19] SUSAN VASTANO VAUGHAN, Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals Under TRIPS: What Standard of Compensation, Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev., Vol. 25:87, 2001.

[22] Jerry Stanton, Comment, Lesson for the United States from Foreign Price Controls on Pharmaceuticals, 16 CONN. J. INT'L L. 149, 156 (2000).

[23] Gerald J. Mossinghof & Thomas Bombelles, The Importance of Intellectual Property Protection to the American Research-Intensive Pharmaceutical Industry, COLuM. J. WORLD Bus., Spring 1996, at 39.

^{^[1]} Tapanjana Rudra, India Business Merger Deal With Reliance Is ‘Best Of Both Worlds’: Disney CEO , Inc 42. 08 Mar'24 Avaliable at nc42.com/buzz/india-business-merger-deal-with-reliance-is-best-of-both-worlds-disney-ceo/ (last visited 14 th April 2024)

^{^[2]} Nimitt Dixit, Disney-Reliance Media Mega-Merger Faces Antitrust Scrutiny. Asian Legal Business – India E-Magazine, February 2024

^[3] Rupin Chopra and Shantam Sharma, India: Jio And Disney Merger: From The Lens Of Competition Due Diligence, 27 February 2024 Avaliable at: https://www.mondaq.com/india/antitrust-eu-competition-/1429176/jio-and-disney-merger-from-the-lens-of-competition-due-diligence (last visited 14th April, 2024)

^{^[6]} THE COMPETITION ACT, 2002, NO. 12, ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, 2003 (INDIA).

^{^[7]} THE COMPETITION ACT, 2002, § 5, NO. 12, ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, 2003 (INDIA).

^{^[8]} THE COMPETITION ACT, 2002, § 20(4), NO. 12, ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, 2003 (INDIA).

^{^[9]} LIVEMINT, https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/reliance-disney-india-merge-streaming-tv-assets-to-create-rs-70-352-crore-media-powerhouse-5-key-highlights-11709129039923.html, (LAST VISITED ON 13TH APRIL, 2024)

[1] DR. POONAM PRADHAN SAXENA, PROPERTY LAW, (3ed. Lexis Nexis 2019).

[4] Aman Mehta, S.53A, Transfer of Property Act- A Sword to its own Shield? SUPREMO AMICUS (Vol.19) https://supremoamicus.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/A1-10.pdf

[7] Nigamananda Patra v. Sarat Chandra Patra, AIR 1998 Ori 19.

[8] Ram Kumar Agarwal v. Thawar Das, (1999) 7 SCC 303.

[9] Shivram Kisan Gunjal v. Ramesh Vishwanath Gunjal, (2010) 5 Mah LJ 623.

[11] Sardar Govindrao Mahadik & Anr v. Devi Sahai & Ors, 1982 AIR 989.

[13] Mohammad Musa v. Aghore Kumar Ganguli, (1914) 42 Cal. 801.

[17] AMA Sultan v Seyda Zohra Bibi, AIR 1990 Ker 186.

[19] Kashinath Mehrotra v Roop Narayan Choudhary, AIR 2008 (NOC) 301 (All).

[21] Ramchandrappa v. Satyanarayana, AIR 1964 SC 877.

[25] Kamalabai Laxman Pathak v. Onkar Parsharam Patil, AIR 1995 Bom 113.

[26] V.R Sudhakara Rao v. T.V Kameswari, (2007) 6 SCC 650.

[29] DR. R.K SINHA, THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, (Dr. Shreedutta Arvind Pandey ed. Central Law Agency 2019).

[30] Devinder Singh v. Fateh Jung Singh and Ors, AIR 2018 P&H 70.

[32] Thakurmal v. Chakradhar Rao Bhosle, AIR 2009 Chh. 27.

[33] Shyam Narayan Prasad v. Krishna Prasad and Ors, AIR 2018 SC 3152.

[34] M Jaya Rao v. M Krishna Rao, AIR 2012 AP 34.

[37] Fgp Ltd v Saleh Hooseini Doctor, (2009) 10 SCC 223.

[38] M Ponnuswamy v M Thamaraikannan, AIR 2008 (NOC) 506 (Kant).

[40] AKK Adalakha v Amrish Sehgal, AIR 2010 (NOC) 1118 (P&H).

[41] Andhra Graphite Pvt Ltd v Jobing Syndicate, AIR 2011 (NOC) 245 (AP).

[42] Sitaram Rao v. Bibhisana Pradhan, AIR 1978 Ori. 222.

[45] State of UP v. District Judge, AIR 1997 SC 53.

[47] Prabodh Kumar Das v. Dantamara Tea Co. Ltd, AIR 1940 PC 1.

[48] Ram Chandra v. Maharaj Kumar, AIR 1939 All. 611; Achayya v. Venkata Subbarao, AIR 1957 AP 854; Dharmaji v. Jagannath Shankar Jadhav, AIR 1994 Bom. 254.

[49] Motilal v. Jaswant Singh, AIR 1964 Raj. 11; Padmalabha v. Appala Narsamma, AIR 1952 Ori. 143; also AIR 1981 Mad. 310.

[50] A.K Srivastava, Bal Krishna, Nature of Right under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act 1882, INDIAN LAW INSTITUTE (1973).

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

WHITE-COLLAR CRIME AND REGULATORY GAPS: EXPLORING LEGAL CHALLENGES AND ENFORCEMENT ISSUES BY - MD. JEWEL ALI

GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BASIC PRINCIPLES OF TRIPS AND THE ERA OF BTAS AND FTAS- A CASE FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. BY - SHIKHAR SINGH

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: UNLOCKING LEGAL INTRICACIES BY - MADHAV GOSWAMI & MUGDHA GARG

A STUDY ON COMPULSORY LICENSING OF PATENT: INDIAN PERSPECTIVE. BY - CHITRA C

EVOLUTION OF WOMENS PROPERTY RIGHTS: A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS UNDER HINDU SUCCESSION ACTS IN INDIA BY - ASHWANI KUMAR, NITESH KUMAR SINGH & ANUJA PIMPALAPURE

DISNEY-RELIANCE MERGER: POWER, PROFIT, AND THE FUTURE OF INDIAN MEDIA BY - ANSHIKA SHAHI & AYANTIKA BHATTACHARYYA

BARRIERS TO LEGAL AID FOR WOMEN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND GLOBAL BEST PRACTICES BY: VEDANSHI VERMA & MS. ANUGYA RANI,

STRENGTHENING ANTI-DEFECTION LAW IN INDIA: A FRAMEWORK FOR ELECTORAL INTEGRITY BY - SHUBHADA PATIL

A RECENT RESEARCH ON SOCIAL INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS CONVERSIONS AMONG TRIBES IN BIHAR BY - DR. RAMESH KUMAR SHUKLA & RUPA JHA

RIGHTS OF TRANSFEREE UNDER SECTION 53-A OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 BY - ARUNAV BHATTACHARJYA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2